Companies Using Foxit

Foxit Usage Statistics

Foxit reads 7,315 domains on our June 2026 rollup, 8,534 in July and 8,700 in August. Three points cannot carry a growth rate, and this movement is coverage rather than adoption. The crawled domain set turns over every month, with dead domains dropping out and newly discovered ones coming in, and detection widens at the same time: the total number of domains seen carrying the Foxit record moved from 7,315 to 8,766 across the same three months, faster than the active line. Read the three points as three sightings of a population we can see progressively more of, not as a trend in sales. One caution belongs here more than on most profiles. The signal is a DNS record that outlives the account which created it, so a domain that enters this series has very little mechanism for leaving it, and a series that can only really move one way should never be read as momentum. The August figure, 8,700, is the one quoted at the top of this page.

Which Countries Use Foxit the Most?

Which countries use Foxit the most? The United States holds 4,021 of the 8,351 companies we could place, 48.15%, ahead of the United Kingdom on 693 (8.30%), Canada on 673 (8.06%), Australia on 480 (5.75%) and Germany on 474 (5.68%). Then the Netherlands 311 (3.72%), Switzerland 254 (3.04%), France 184 (2.20%), New Zealand 164 (1.96%), Belgium 106 (1.27%), Spain 97 (1.16%), Norway 73 (0.87%), Thailand 65 (0.78%), Italy 56 (0.67%) and Denmark 52 (0.62%). The shape worth naming is the English-speaking block: the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand together are 6,031 companies, 72.22% of the 8,351. Continental Europe sits behind that, led by Germany and the Netherlands, with Switzerland at 254 ahead of France at 184 despite a far smaller economy, which is what a base of banks, insurers and engineering firms tends to look like. Two caveats before reading the table. Country here is the headquarters on the company record, not where the software is installed. And because a verification record is published once at a group apex, a multinational that buys centrally appears once under its head office rather than once per subsidiary, which pushes weight toward the countries where head offices sit.

Foxit Market Share Among Documentation Platforms

What is Foxit's market share? Foxit holds 5.00% of Documentation Platforms and ranks 2nd of 70 in that category, on 8,700 domains. Second place needs handling, because it sounds like more than it is. Zendesk leads the category on 111,482 domains and 64.05%, close to thirteen times Foxit's count and thirteen times its share. The rows nearest Foxit are MediaWiki on 6,097 domains (3.50%), Postman API Documentation on 6,068 (3.49%) and Docusaurus on 5,507 (3.16%). Those three, and Zendesk above them, publish documentation onto the web: a help centre, a wiki, an API reference, a static docs site. Foxit is PDF software installed on desktops and servers. Being second in this table means Foxit is the second most-detected technology filed on that shelf; it does not mean Foxit and Zendesk are shortlisted against each other. The two are not even measured on the same surface. Zendesk is found on a help centre served to a browser, Foxit in a DNS record on the apex. A share computed across two kinds of evidence is a position in a taxonomy, not a measure of spend, seats or documents processed.

Foxit Customers by Company Size & Age

What size companies use Foxit? This is a mid-market base and the distribution says so without much ambiguity. 2,304 of the 8,356 companies with a size band, 27.57%, employ 51 to 200 people, the largest band in the table, with 11-50 second on 1,965 (23.52%) and 1-10 third on 1,380 (16.52%). Widen it one step and 51 to 500 employees is 3,530 companies, 42.24% of the 8,356, against 3,345 (40.03%) at fifty or fewer and only 861 companies, 10.30%, above a thousand. The tail is thin at the top: 620 companies at 501-1,000 (7.42%), 619 at 1,001-5,000 (7.41%), 113 at 5,001-10,000 (1.35%) and 129 at 10,001+ (1.54%). Now set that against the named table, where every organisation shown sits in the two largest bands, because that list is ordered by LinkedIn following. It shows the top of the base rather than its centre. The centre is a firm of a hundred or so people that produces enough contracts, drawings, reports and signed documents to want paid PDF editing deployed across the office, and that is a different buyer, on a different budget, from the ones in the logo table.

What Industries Use Foxit the Most?

Construction leads at 7.40% of the 8,066 companies with a recorded industry, 597 companies, ahead of Financial Services on 429 (5.32%), Hospitals and Health Care on 400 (4.96%), IT Services and IT Consulting on 378 (4.69%) and Insurance on 340 (4.22%). Then Law Practice 291 (3.61%), Real Estate 263 (3.26%), Non-profit Organizations 168 (2.08%), Government Administration 165 (2.05%) and Oil and Gas 153 (1.90%). Group the labels that describe the same problem and the base gets easier to read. Financial Services, Insurance, Law Practice, Hospitals and Health Care and Government Administration come to 1,625 companies, 20.15% of the 8,066: a document-heavy regulated block where a PDF is the file that gets signed, redacted, retained and audited. Construction belongs beside it for a related reason. It runs on drawings, submittals, requests for information and executed contracts, so the industry at the top of this table is the one whose daily work product is a document. No label passes 8%, which is itself worth saying: Foxit is not a vertical product. The ten labels shown account for 3,184 companies and the rest of the table carries the remaining 4,882 of the 8,066, 60.52%, spread thinly across everything else.

Regulated document work is the block that defines this page: 1,625 of the 8,066 companies with a recorded industry, 20.15%. The named table shows what that looks like at the top of the list. Standard Bank Group and Rabobank sit in banking and financial services, Travelers and WTW in insurance and risk, Ascension in hospitals and health care, and Takeda and Boehringer Ingelheim in pharmaceutical manufacturing, where a regulatory submission is a stack of PDFs with an agency at the other end. Construction at 597 companies, 7.40%, brings AtkinsRéalis and Schlumberger's subsea business, both engineering estates whose deliverable is a drawing set with revisions and sign-off attached. Two things this table hides are worth stating. Foxit sells server and SDK products as well as desktop editors, so a claims system, a case management tool or a permit portal that generates and stamps documents can be the whole reason a domain carries the record, with nobody at a desk clicking through an editor at all. And industry sits on the company record rather than on the workload, so Schlumberger is filed under Technology, Information and Internet and Concentrix under IT Services and IT Consulting, labels that describe the parent group rather than the documents its people handle. A bare-apex signal also collapses a group to one row: Hilton is one domain here whether the record covers one brand or all of them.

Foxit Alternatives & Competitors

This table lists the largest technologies filed in the same category, not the products a Foxit buyer shortlists. Zendesk on 111,482 domains and 64.05%, MediaWiki on 6,097 (3.50%), Postman API Documentation on 6,068 (3.49%) and Docusaurus on 5,507 (3.16%) are all tools for publishing documentation onto the web. Foxit is PDF software installed on desktops and servers. Second place in Documentation Platforms means Foxit is the second most-detected technology filed there, and nothing more than that, because the four rows around it answer a different buying question and are found on a different surface: a served help centre or docs site in their case, a DNS record on the apex in Foxit's.

There is no switching table on this page, and that is a decision rather than a gap. Two reasons, and the second is the stronger one. The first is the evidence in front of us: 105 domains have stopped showing the Foxit record, and running the destination query against all 69 other technologies in the category returned exactly two rows, of one domain each. Nothing there clears its own base rate and nothing there is a trend, so we publish nothing rather than dress up noise. The second reason is structural and would still apply at ten times the volume. A verification record survives the account that created it. DNS does not get pruned when a contract ends, so a company that moves off Foxit usually keeps the TXT record, keeps appearing in this data, and never registers as a departure at all. This rule measures arrival well and departure badly, and a switching table built on it would be reporting the wrong end of the relationship.

Technology	Domains	Market Share
Zendesk	111,482	64.05%
MediaWiki	6,097	3.5%
Postman API Documentation	6,068	3.49%
Docusaurus	5,507	3.16%
Open Journal Systems	5,253	3.02%

Tech Stack of Foxit-Powered Websites

Every percentage in this table divides by the 9,177 domains our live crawl currently answers for Foxit, a different base from the 8,700 in the August rollup at the top of the page. No row here is a share of the headline count.

Start with the first group, because it is the only like-for-like comparison on the page. Verified SaaS accounts on the same domains are found exactly the way Foxit is, as a vendor verification record published in DNS at the apex. Same surface, same kind of evidence, same undercount, so the ratios between these rows and Foxit's own number mean something. Atlassian is on 1,486 of the 9,177 live domains (16.19%), DocuSign on 1,065 (11.61%), Zoom on 858 (9.35%), Smartsheet on 481 (5.24%), Webex on 405 (4.41%), Miro on 287 (3.13%), LogMeIn on 226 (2.46%) and Jamf on 183 (1.99%). DocuSign is the row to stop on. 1,065 domains, 11.61% of the 9,177, verified to both Foxit and DocuSign, which is a document pipeline written into one zone file: the file is produced and edited in one system and executed in another, and both vendors take a verification record out of it. Jamf at 1.99% is smaller but sharper, since those 183 organisations are running a managed Apple fleet alongside their Foxit account.

The content management group is ordinary, and saying so is the honest reading. WordPress is on 4,992 of the 9,177 (54.40%), then Drupal 356 (3.88%), Webflow 244 (2.66%), Squarespace 238 (2.59%), Wix 209 (2.28%), TYPO3 CMS 172 (1.87%) and Craft CMS 127 (1.38%). A WordPress share above half is what a broad cross-section of business domains looks like rather than anything specific to this buyer. Where a page-level profile can use its CMS block as a second, independent line of evidence about who the customer is, this one cannot: the Foxit record says nothing about how a company builds its website, and a flat CMS distribution is the result you should expect.

CRM reads better. Salesforce is on 784 of the 9,177 (8.54%), Zoho on 322 (3.51%), Amazon Business on 189 (2.06%), Microsoft Dynamics 365 on 156 (1.70%) and Q4 on 41 (0.45%). Zoho at 3.51% is the row that agrees with the size table: it is bought by companies in the 51-200 band that dominates this base, and its ratio to Salesforce here is higher than an enterprise-weighted base would produce.

Consent and privacy: CookieYes 703 (7.66%), Cookie Control 539 (5.87%), Cookiebot 485 (5.28%), OneTrust 414 (4.51%), Complianz 256 (2.79%) and Usercentrics 146 (1.59%). The mid-market and WordPress-first tools sitting above the enterprise platform match the size distribution again. The point that matters for this page, though, is that none of these can touch Foxit's detection. A DNS record is answered by a resolver, not served by a web server, so no consent banner, bot rule or login wall stands between us and it. That is a real advantage this rule has over the page-level signals behind most profiles on TechnologyChecker.io: the record either resolves or it does not.

Verified SaaS Accounts on the Same Domains

Atlassian

1,486 (16.19%)

DocuSign

1,065 (11.61%)

Zoom

858 (9.35%)

Smartsheet

481 (5.24%)

Webex

405 (4.41%)

Miro

287 (3.13%)

LogMeIn

226 (2.46%)

Jamf

183 (1.99%)

Content Management

WordPress

4,992 (54.4%)

Drupal

356 (3.88%)

Webflow

244 (2.66%)

Squarespace

238 (2.59%)

Wix

209 (2.28%)

TYPO3 CMS

172 (1.87%)

Craft CMS

127 (1.38%)

CRM

Salesforce

784 (8.54%)

Zoho

322 (3.51%)

Amazon Business

189 (2.06%)

Microsoft Dynamics 365

156 (1.7%)

Q4

41 (0.45%)

Consent & Privacy

CookieYes

703 (7.66%)

Cookie Control

539 (5.87%)

Cookiebot

485 (5.28%)

OneTrust

414 (4.51%)

Complianz

256 (2.79%)

Usercentrics

146 (1.59%)

Expert Analysis: Foxit Growth Trends & Key Signals for Sales Teams in 2026

David ThomsonCTO, TechnologyChecker

Frequently Asked Questions