Our October 2026 crawl finds 2,642 domains with an AbuseIPDB verification record. AbuseIPDB is a shared database where sysadmins report and check abusive IP addresses, and a user who proves they run a domain becomes a verified webmaster, with 3,000 API requests a day instead of 1,000. So the count is organisations and individuals who verified a domain with AbuseIPDB at least once. Below is the list of companies that use AbuseIPDB, from Ulta Beauty, Eurostar and PizzaExpress to universities such as Rutgers and Lund.

AbuseIPDB ranks 7th of 17 in Security Testing & Compliance with a 2.06% share. This is a sysadmin's tool, and the list shows it: IT services lead the industries at 18.62%, 42.57% of matched companies have 10 or fewer staff, and 834 of the 2,642 domains don't match a company at all, many of them personal servers and hobby sites.

Published Oct 11, 2026 · Updated Oct 15, 2026 · Data analysed on October 11, 2026.

Share:

AbuseIPDB Usage Statistics

The chart rises from 1,942 domains in June 2026 to 2,642 in October. That change belongs mostly to our crawl, not to AbuseIPDB: the domains we cover turn over every month as dead sites drop out and new ones are added, and our DNS detection widened during those months. Removals are rare. 37 domains have dropped the record since we began tracking removals on 16 March 2026, and 5 of them still carry it on another hostname.

List of Companies Using AbuseIPDB

This list of companies that use AbuseIPDB names 50 of the 1,808 matched companies, ordered by LinkedIn following. Every row carried an abuseipdb-verification record when we read its DNS on 15 October 2026. We replaced nine rows where our company match was wrong, such as a student racing team matched to a university's domain, and corrected several names to the domain's real owner.

Download all 2,642 AbuseIPDB customers with full company data, or create a signal to track when companies start or stop using AbuseIPDB.

Verified list of companies and domains where we detect AbuseIPDB — sorted by company size. Companies matched to domains where we detect AbuseIPDB; a detection may be one storefront rather than a company-wide deployment.
CompanyDetection URLDomainCountryIndustryEmployeesTypeFoundedLinkedIn
Ulta Beauty, Inc. logoUlta Beauty, Inc.
ulta.comulta.comUnited StatesRetail10001+Public Company1990https://linkedin.com/company/ulta
NTPC logoNTPC
ntpc.co.inntpc.co.inIndiaUtilities10001+Public Company1975https://linkedin.com/company/ntpc
Metro Inc. logoMetro Inc.
metro.cametro.caCanadaRetail10001+Public Company1947https://linkedin.com/company/metro-inc.
FAO logoFAO
fao.orgfao.orgItalyNon-profit Organizations10001+Government Agency1945https://linkedin.com/company/fao
Rutgers University logoRutgers University
rutgers.edurutgers.eduUnited StatesHigher Education10001+Educational1766https://linkedin.com/company/rutgersu
Department of Defence (Australia) logoDepartment of Defence (Australia)
defence.gov.audefence.gov.auAustraliaDefense and Space Manufacturing10001+Government Agency1901https://linkedin.com/company/defenceaustralia
Anglo-Eastern group logoAnglo-Eastern group
angloeastern.comangloeastern.comHong KongMaritime Transportation10001+Privately Held1974https://linkedin.com/company/anglo-eastern
Lund University logoLund University
lu.selu.seSwedenHigher Education5001-10000Educational1666https://linkedin.com/company/fslu
Bob Evans Farms, LLC logoBob Evans Farms, LLC
www.bobevansgrocery.combobevansgrocery.comUnited StatesFood and Beverage Manufacturing1001-5000Privately Held1948https://linkedin.com/company/bob-evans
Northern Arizona University logoNorthern Arizona University
nau.edunau.eduUnited StatesHigher Education1001-5000Educational1899https://linkedin.com/company/northern-arizona-university
Show 40 more AbuseIPDB using companies as demo data
CompanyDetection URLCountryIndustryEmployeesTypeFounded
Aptar logoAptar
aptar.comaptar.comUnited StatesPackaging and Containers Manufacturing10001+Public Company1964https://linkedin.com/company/aptar
Seattle Public Schools logoSeattle Public Schools
seattleschools.orgseattleschools.orgUnited StatesEducation Administration Programs5001-10000Educational—https://linkedin.com/company/seattle-public-schools
Instituto Nacional de Estatística logoInstituto Nacional de Estatística
ine.ptine.ptPortugalGovernment Administration501-1000Government Agency1935https://linkedin.com/company/ine
Nnamdi Azikiwe University logoNnamdi Azikiwe University
unizik.edu.ngunizik.edu.ngNigeriaEducation Management5001-10000Educational1980https://linkedin.com/company/nnamdi-azikiwe-university-awka
Tilly's Inc logoTilly's Inc
tillys.comtillys.comUnited StatesRetail5001-10000Public Company1982https://linkedin.com/company/tillys
Steel Dynamics, Inc. logoSteel Dynamics, Inc.
steeldynamics.comsteeldynamics.comUnited StatesManufacturing10001+Public Company1993https://linkedin.com/company/steel-dynamics-inc
Telkom University logoTelkom University
telkomuniversity.ac.idtelkomuniversity.ac.idIndonesiaEducation Administration Programs1001-5000Educational2013https://linkedin.com/company/telkom-university
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute logoRensselaer Polytechnic Institute
rpi.edurpi.eduUnited StatesHigher Education1001-5000Educational1824https://linkedin.com/company/rensselaer-polytechnic-institute
School District U-46 logoSchool District U-46
u-46.orgu-46.orgUnited StatesPrimary and Secondary Education5001-10000Educational1875https://linkedin.com/company/school-district-u-46
Chickasaw Nation logoChickasaw Nation
chickasaw.netchickasaw.netUnited StatesGovernment Administration10001+Government Agency—https://linkedin.com/company/chickasaw-nation
Singapore Management University logoSingapore Management University
smu.edu.sgsmu.edu.sgSingaporeHigher Education501-1000Educational2000https://linkedin.com/company/singapore-management-university
International Air Transport Association logoInternational Air Transport Association
iata.orgiata.orgSwitzerlandAirlines and Aviation1001-5000Nonprofit1945https://linkedin.com/company/international-air-transport-association-iata
Weber State University logoWeber State University
weber.eduweber.eduUnited StatesHigher Education1001-5000Educational1889https://linkedin.com/company/weberstate
CQUniversity logoCQUniversity
cqu.edu.aucqu.edu.auAustraliaHigher Education1001-5000Educational1967https://linkedin.com/company/cquniversityaustralia
DIGI Group logoDIGI Group
digi.rodigi.roRomaniaTelecommunications5001-10000Privately Held—https://linkedin.com/company/digiromania
Wipfli LLP logoWipfli LLP
wipfli.comwipfli.comUnited StatesBusiness Consulting and Services1001-5000Partnership2004https://linkedin.com/company/wipfli
PizzaExpress Ltd logoPizzaExpress Ltd
pizzaexpress.compizzaexpress.comUnited KingdomFood and Beverage Services5001-10000Privately Held1965https://linkedin.com/company/pizzaexpress
Marshall University logoMarshall University
marshall.edumarshall.eduUnited StatesHigher Education1001-5000Educational1837https://linkedin.com/company/marshall-university
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande logoUniversidade Federal de Campina Grande
ufcg.edu.brufcg.edu.brBrazilHigher Education1001-5000Educational2002https://linkedin.com/company/universidade-federal-de-campina-grande
Tempus Unlimited, Inc. logoTempus Unlimited, Inc.
tempusunlimited.orgtempusunlimited.orgUnited StatesConsumer Services201-500Nonprofit1950https://linkedin.com/company/tempus-unlimited-inc
Unicaen logoUnicaen
unicaen.frunicaen.frFranceHigher Education1001-5000Educational1432https://linkedin.com/company/universite-de-caen-normandie
Emblem Health logoEmblem Health
emblemhealth.comemblemhealth.comUnited StatesInsurance1001-5000Nonprofit—https://linkedin.com/company/emblemhealth
BNDES logoBNDES
bndes.gov.brbndes.gov.brBrazilBanking1001-5000Government Agency1952https://linkedin.com/company/bndes
Stephen F. Austin State University logoStephen F. Austin State University
sfasu.edusfasu.eduUnited StatesHigher Education1001-5000Educational1923https://linkedin.com/company/sfasu
North American Lighting, Inc. logoNorth American Lighting, Inc.
nal.comnal.comUnited StatesMotor Vehicle Manufacturing1001-5000Privately Held1983https://linkedin.com/company/north-american-lighting
Eurostar logoEurostar
eurostar.comeurostar.comUnited KingdomTravel Arrangements1001-5000Privately Held1994https://linkedin.com/company/eurostar
University of Siena logoUniversity of Siena
unisi.itunisi.itItalyResearch Services1001-5000Educational1240https://linkedin.com/company/universita-di-siena
University of Fribourg logoUniversity of Fribourg
unifr.chunifr.chSwitzerlandHigher Education1001-5000Educational1889https://linkedin.com/company/university-of-fribourg
CIRAD logoCIRAD
cirad.frcirad.frFranceResearch Services1001-5000Government Agency1984https://linkedin.com/company/cirad
Bouvet logoBouvet
bouvet.nobouvet.noNorwayIT Services and IT Consulting1001-5000Public Company2002https://linkedin.com/company/bouvet-asa
Sports Information Services Limited logoSports Information Services Limited
sis.tvsis.tvUnited KingdomSpectator Sports201-500Privately Held1986https://linkedin.com/company/sports-information-services-ltd-sis
Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3 logoUniversité Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3
univ-montp3.fruniv-montp3.frFranceHigher Education1001-5000Educational—https://linkedin.com/company/universit%c3%a9-de-montpellier-paul-val%c3%a9ry
IT Solutions logoIT Solutions
it-solutions.com.mxit-solutions.com.mxMexicoIT Services and IT Consulting51-200Privately Held2002https://linkedin.com/company/it-solutions
University of Deusto logoUniversity of Deusto
deusto.esdeusto.esSpainHigher Education1001-5000Educational1886https://linkedin.com/company/deusto
GPV Group logoGPV Group
gpv-group.comgpv-group.comDenmarkAppliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing5001-10000Privately Held1961https://linkedin.com/company/gpv
Sinarmas MSIG Life logoSinarmas MSIG Life
msiglife.co.idmsiglife.co.idIndonesiaInsurance501-1000Public Company1985https://linkedin.com/company/pt-asuransi-jiwa-sinarmas-msig-sinarmas-msig-life-
Convera Holdings, LLC. logoConvera Holdings, LLC.
convera.comconvera.comUnited StatesFinancial Services1001-5000Privately Held2021https://linkedin.com/company/converaholdings
Noorderpoort logoNoorderpoort
noorderpoort.nlnoorderpoort.nlNetherlandsEducation Management1001-5000Educational1998https://linkedin.com/company/noorderpoort
Belmond logoBelmond
belmond.combelmond.comUnited KingdomHospitality5001-10000Public Company1976https://linkedin.com/company/belmond
Forcepoint logoForcepoint
forcepoint.comforcepoint.comUnited StatesSoftware Development1001-5000Privately Held1994https://linkedin.com/company/forcepoint

There are 2,642 companies and domains where we detect AbuseIPDB, sign up to download the entire AbuseIPDB dataset.

Recognisable companies that use AbuseIPDB in 2026. Each still carried the verification record when we checked its DNS on 15 October 2026:

  • Ulta Beauty: ulta.com
  • Eurostar: eurostar.com
  • PizzaExpress: pizzaexpress.com
  • NTPC: ntpc.co.in, India's state power producer
  • Steel Dynamics: steeldynamics.com
  • Forcepoint: forcepoint.com, itself a security vendor
  • Convera: convera.com, the payments company
  • FAO: fao.org, the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization
  • IATA: iata.org
  • Rutgers University: rutgers.edu

Which Countries Use AbuseIPDB the Most?

Which countries use AbuseIPDB the most? The United States leads with 449 matched companies, then Germany (165) and the United Kingdom (136). France (73), the Netherlands (67), Australia (63) and Spain (61) follow. The European countries in the table add up to 680, well ahead of the US, and Germany, Austria and Switzerland together reach 229. These counts cover the 1,808 domains we matched to a company.

🇺🇸United States44924.8%
🇩🇪Germany1659.1%
🇬🇧United Kingdom1367.5%
🇫🇷France734.0%
🇳🇱Netherlands673.7%
🇦🇺Australia633.5%
🇪🇸Spain613.4%
🇮🇹Italy573.2%
🇨🇦Canada563.1%
🇧🇷Brazil553.0%
🇨🇭Switzerland372.0%
🏳️Poland341.9%
🇦🇹Austria271.5%
🇧🇪Belgium231.3%
🏳️Indonesia221.2%

Share of the 1,808 AbuseIPDB domains we matched to a company record — 68.4% of the 2,642 we detect. Top 15 countries shown, so these do not sum to 100%. Domains with no matching company record are not represented here and skew small and independent.

AbuseIPDB Market Share Among Security Testing & Compliance

What is AbuseIPDB's market share? 2.06% of Security Testing & Compliance, 7th of 17 technologies, on 2,642 of the category's 128,054 domains, per our crawl at TechnologyChecker.io. Wiz is one place higher with 2,717 and SpyCloud one lower with 2,355. Every one of those neighbours is counted from a DNS verification record, but they sell to very different buyers, so the ranking says more about who bothers to verify than about market size.

Customers2.6KCompanies using AbuseIPDB
Companies Analyzed1.8KWith LinkedIn company data
Market Share2.06%Of the category market
Category Ranking#7In its category

Top Competitors by Market Share

AbuseIPDB Customers by Company Size & Age

What size companies use AbuseIPDB? Very small ones, mostly. 42.57% of matched companies with a known size have 1 to 10 staff (754 of 1,771) and 25.64% have 11 to 50, so 68.21% have 50 or fewer. 115 have more than 1,000, a group led by universities and a few companies such as Ulta Beauty, NTPC and Steel Dynamics.

Company Size Distribution

Company Age (Founded Decade)

The largest group was founded in the 2010s (31.78%), then the 2000s (25.6%) and the 1990s (13.89%). 9.89% started in the 2020s. The oldest rows are universities: Siena (1240), Caen (1432), Lund (1666) and Rutgers (1766). Only 6.55% of matched companies predate 1960.

What Industries Use AbuseIPDB the Most?

IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 18.62%, then Technology, Information and Internet (10.47%) and Software Development (8.44%), based on our enriched company data. Add Information Technology & Services (4.89%) and Computer and Network Security (3.2%) and IT-related industries reach 45.62%. Higher Education (3.55%) and Telecommunications (2.73%) are the next clusters, both places that run their own servers.

IT Services and IT Consulting320 (18.62%)
Technology, Information and Internet180 (10.47%)
Software Development145 (8.44%)
Information Technology & Services84 (4.89%)
Higher Education61 (3.55%)
Computer and Network Security55 (3.2%)

Hosting and IT service firms using AbuseIPDB are the core: IT-related industries make up 45.62% of matched companies, and 7 of 50 randomly sampled domains were hosting, VoIP or IT-security businesses. Universities using AbuseIPDB are the most visible names, Rutgers, Lund, Northern Arizona, Rensselaer and the University of Fribourg among them. Retailers on AbuseIPDB are rarer but present: Ulta Beauty, Tilly's and Metro.

AbuseIPDB Alternatives & Competitors

AbuseIPDB's table neighbours share its signal, a DNS verification record, but not its job. Have I Been Pwned (14.38%) searches breached email addresses, Detectify (4.09%) scans websites, Wiz (2.12%) secures cloud accounts and SpyCloud (1.84%) monitors stolen credentials. AbuseIPDB's real alternatives are other IP-reputation services, such as isMalicious, which publishes a comparison with it, and none of them is in our category table.

TechnologyDomainsMarket Share
A favicon of Have I Been Pwned
Have I Been Pwned
18,41114.38%
A favicon of Detectify
Detectify
5,2344.09%
Wiz
2,7172.12%
A favicon of SpyCloud
SpyCloud
2,3551.84%

AbuseIPDB Customer Migration

Tech Stack of AbuseIPDB-Powered Websites

Across the 2,649 domains in our clean set, Cloudflare runs on 49.3% and its Browser Insights on 20.42%, the highest of the six DNS-verified security pages in this category (KnowBe4 6.87%, Wiz 10.79%, Have I Been Pwned 11.65%, Detectify 15.48%, SpyCloud 6.3%). Google Analytics is on only 51.38%, and Matomo (5.81%) and Plausible (2.23%) show a self-hosting, privacy-minded minority. WordPress runs on 36.47%.

CMS & Website Builders

A favicon of WordPress
WordPress
966 (36.47%)
A favicon of Elementor
Elementor
315 (11.89%)
A favicon of Drupal
Drupal
66 (2.49%)
A favicon of wpBakery
wpBakery
55 (2.08%)
A favicon of Webflow
Webflow
41 (1.55%)

Web Analytics

A favicon of Google Analytics
Google Analytics
1,361 (51.38%)
A favicon of Cloudflare Browser Insights
Cloudflare Browser Insights
541 (20.42%)
A favicon of Matomo Analytics
Matomo Analytics
154 (5.81%)
A favicon of Site Kit
Site Kit
79 (2.98%)
WordPress.com Stats
60 (2.27%)
A favicon of Plausible
Plausible
59 (2.23%)

Consent & Privacy Management

A favicon of CookieYes
CookieYes
100 (3.78%)
A favicon of Complianz
Complianz
79 (2.98%)
A favicon of Cookie Control
Cookie Control
73 (2.76%)
A favicon of Cookiebot
Cookiebot
70 (2.64%)
A favicon of Funding Choices
Funding Choices
54 (2.04%)
A favicon of OneTrust
OneTrust
53 (2%)

Identity & Access (SSO/CIAM)

A favicon of Facebook Login
Facebook Login
79 (2.98%)
A favicon of Google Sign-in
Google Sign-in
60 (2.27%)
A favicon of 1Password
1Password
52 (1.96%)
A favicon of Duo Security
Duo Security
44 (1.66%)

CDN

A favicon of Cloudflare
Cloudflare
1,306 (49.3%)
A favicon of jsDelivr
jsDelivr
394 (14.87%)
A favicon of cdnjs
cdnjs
373 (14.08%)
A favicon of jQuery CDN
jQuery CDN
130 (4.91%)
A favicon of Unpkg
Unpkg
125 (4.72%)

AbuseIPDB Customer Reviews with Pros and Cons

Across all 11 Trustpilot reviews we read in October 2026, sysadmins value AbuseIPDB as a free, shared place to check and report abusive IP addresses. The main complaint, mostly from people whose own IPs were listed, is false reports that are hard to dispute.

Generated from real user reviews on Trustpilot

Pros
  • Sysadmins value a shared database of abusive IPs where they can check an address's history and report attacks.(5 reviews)
  • Reviewers like that a free tier remains available, letting admins open an account at no cost.(3 reviews)
  • One webmaster praises the easy-to-implement API for server scripts and firewalls.(1 review)
Cons
  • Most complaints concern false or careless reports that get IP addresses listed without real evidence of abuse.(4 reviews)
  • Listed users say disputing reports is hard, with limited contact options and no replies from the team.(3 reviews)
  • One long-time user objects to charging for paid plans built on community-submitted data.(1 review)

Expert Analysis: AbuseIPDB Growth Trends & Key Signals for Sales Teams in 2026

David Thomson
David ThomsonCTO, TechnologyChecker

Our crawler reads the TXT records of every domain it visits, and AbuseIPDB's record is about as close to a sysadmin's signature as DNS gets. A domain counts when a TXT record contains abuseipdb-verification. Our October 2026 crawl puts that at 2,642 domains, 1,808 matched to a company, 7th of 17 in Security Testing & Compliance. When I re-read the 2,649 domains in our clean set on 15 October, 2,628 still had it.

What the record proves

AbuseIPDB's FAQ gives the reason to verify: regular users get 1,000 API requests a day, verified webmasters 3,000. Webmaster status also gives a user's reports slightly more weight in the confidence score. So the record marks someone who reports or checks IP addresses in volume, usually from a firewall, a mail server or Fail2Ban, and who wanted the higher limit. It says nothing about buying anything, and a paid Basic or Premium plan leaves no separate trace in DNS.

Sales signal: a domain with this record has a person who reads server logs and automates blocking. That's the buyer for hosting, firewall and log tools, and rarely a procurement department.

One verifier per domain

AbuseIPDB's code is per account, and it barely repeats: the 2,628 domains carry 2,552 different codes, and 2,503 codes sit on a single domain. The biggest shared code covers 16 unrelated Italian and other sites, probably one developer's clients, and another covers 10 small Australian and American businesses. The Portuguese publisher of Correio da Manhã and Record verified 12 of its titles under one code. Eleven more domains carry the record with an empty value, which looks like a DNS template copied without its code; they still count in the 2,642, though they prove nothing. Codes held for other people's domains come to about 1% of the count.

"Almost every AbuseIPDB domain has its own code. That's what a tool used by individual sysadmins looks like in DNS." - David Thomson, CTO at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales signal: you can treat rows as separate decision-makers here, unlike on Wiz or Detectify, where one code can cover dozens of domains.

Steady, not growing

The chart goes from 1,942 domains in June to 2,642 in October. That's our crawl, not AbuseIPDB: the domains we cover turn over each month as dead sites leave and new ones are found, and our DNS detection widened over the same months. 37 domains dropped the record since 16 March 2026, 5 still carry it on another hostname, and 32 of the 38 dropped hostnames had really removed it when I checked.

Sales signal: a pool of about 2,600 domains that changes slowly. Don't build a forecast on the chart.

Who verifies

Small technical businesses. 42.57% of matched companies have 1 to 10 staff and 68.21% have 50 or fewer; IT Services and IT Consulting is the top industry at 18.62%, and IT-related rows add up to 45.62%. 834 domains, 31.57% of the count, match no company. In a random sample of 50 domains I opened, 7 were hosting, VoIP or security firms and 6 were personal sites: a developer's portfolio, a radio hobbyist's blog, self-hosted servers. The big names are universities, Rutgers, Lund and Northern Arizona, plus Ulta Beauty, Eurostar, PizzaExpress and NTPC.

Sales signal: for hosting, VPS and managed-firewall vendors this is a good list. For enterprise security it isn't; filter to the 115 companies above 1,000 staff first.

A European user base

The United States has 449 matched companies, but Germany has 165 and the United Kingdom 136. The European countries in our table add up to 680. Germany, Austria and Switzerland reach 229, about half the American figure. On Wiz's page, Germany and Switzerland together come to 139 against 1,246 American companies.

Sales signal: German-speaking hosting and IT firms are over-represented here. A DACH campaign for server tooling has a usable list.

No switching to report

We publish no migration table for AbuseIPDB, and our checks found no overlap with another tracked tool large enough to quote. That fits the product: it's a free shared database that people use alongside firewalls and other feeds, not instead of them.

"Nobody leaves AbuseIPDB for a competitor. They stop running the server that reported to it, and the DNS record stays where it was." - David Thomson, CTO at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales signal: there's no displacement play here. Sell what sits next to it: blocklists, WAF rules and log analysis.

The stack around it

On the 2,649 clean domains, Cloudflare runs on 49.3% and Cloudflare Browser Insights on 20.42%, against 10.79% on Wiz's page. Google Analytics is on 51.38%, lower than on the other security pages, and Matomo (5.81%) and Plausible (2.23%) take up some of the rest. Consent banners are scarce: CookieYes leads on only 3.78%.

Sales signal: self-hosted, privacy-minded and technical. Developer-first products with self-hosted options will land better than enterprise suites.

What it costs

The pricing page keeps an Individual plan free, with 1,000 checks and reports a day. Basic costs $25 a month ($228 a year) for 10,000, Premium $99 a month ($1,068 a year) for 50,000, and Enterprise is quoted. Marathon Studios Inc. in Pennsylvania has run the service since March 2016, per its FAQ.

Sales signal: most verifiers stay free. The few who need more than 3,000 calls a day are running security products or large networks, and they're the paying minority.

Key takeaways

1. 2,642 domains in October 2026, 7th of 17; nearly all verified a domain for webmaster status at least once.

2. Nearly one code per domain: 2,552 codes on 2,628 domains.

3. 42.57% of matched companies have 1 to 10 staff, and 31.57% of domains match no company.

4. Europe outnumbers the US, 680 matched companies to 449.

5. No switching or overlap large enough to report.

How to use this list

Filter by company size and industry, and keep the domains with no company match for technical products only. Our DNS statistics report explains why we read TXT records as history. The full list of 2,642 domains, with 1,808 matched companies and their size, country and industry, is on TechnologyChecker.io.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who uses AbuseIPDB?

System administrators, hosting firms and IT service companies above all, plus universities and a handful of large businesses. Our October 2026 crawl finds the verification record on 2,642 domains; 1,808 match a company, and 42.57% of those have 1 to 10 staff. Named users include Ulta Beauty, Eurostar, PizzaExpress, NTPC, Forcepoint and Rutgers, Lund and Northern Arizona universities.

How many customers does AbuseIPDB have?

AbuseIPDB is free for most users, so customers is the wrong word. We count 2,642 domains in October 2026 whose owner verified them with AbuseIPDB, most likely to become a verified webmaster. Its codes are per account: on 15 October, 2,628 domains carried 2,552 different codes, so almost every domain is a separate user. Paid plans aren't visible in DNS.

What is AbuseIPDB's market share?

AbuseIPDB holds 2.06% of Security Testing & Compliance at TechnologyChecker.io, 7th of the 17 technologies we track, on 2,642 domains. Wiz (2,717) is just above and SpyCloud (2,355) just below. Those tools are counted the same way, from DNS verification records, but they're bought by different people, so the share compares verifiers rather than competitors.

What are the best alternatives to AbuseIPDB?

Other IP-reputation and threat-intelligence services: isMalicious publishes a direct comparison, and IPVoid turns up in the same searches. Our category table doesn't track them, because they leave no DNS record we detect. The tools ranked beside AbuseIPDB in our table, Have I Been Pwned, Detectify, Wiz and SpyCloud, do other jobs, from breach search to cloud security.

Which countries use AbuseIPDB the most?

The United States, with 449 matched companies, then Germany (165) and the United Kingdom (136). France (73), the Netherlands (67), Australia (63), Spain (61) and Italy (57) follow. The European countries in our table add up to 680, against 449 American companies, so AbuseIPDB is more European than most security tools in this category.

What size companies use AbuseIPDB?

Very small ones. Of matched companies with a known size, 42.57% have 1 to 10 employees and 25.64% have 11 to 50, so 68.21% have 50 or fewer. Only 115 have more than 1,000 staff, mostly universities plus companies such as Ulta Beauty, NTPC and Steel Dynamics. Another 834 domains match no company, many of them personal servers.

How old are companies that use AbuseIPDB?

Fairly young. The largest group was founded in the 2010s (31.78%), then the 2000s (25.6%) and 1990s (13.89%); 9.89% started in the 2020s and only 6.55% before 1960. The oldest rows are universities such as Siena (1240), Lund (1666) and Rutgers (1766). Typical users are IT and hosting firms from the last 25 years.

What is the ideal customer profile for AbuseIPDB?

On our data: an IT services, hosting or software business with 1 to 10 staff, founded in the 2010s, in the US, Germany or the UK, running its own servers, often behind Cloudflare (49.3%). Universities and public bodies are a second group. A third of domains don't match a company in our data, and in a sample many were individual sysadmins' and hobby servers.

What is the purpose of AbuseIPDB?

AbuseIPDB collects reports of IP addresses involved in spam, hacking attempts, DDoS attacks and other abuse, and lets anyone check an address against those reports. Its FAQ calls it a project to help system administrators and webmasters, with a free API for both reporting and checking. Firewalls and tools such as Fail2Ban can report attacking addresses to it automatically.

Is AbuseIPDB free?

Yes, for most users. The free Individual plan allows 1,000 checks and reports a day through the API, and verified webmasters get 3,000. Paid plans, per AbuseIPDB's pricing page, are Basic at $25 a month ($228 a year) for 10,000 a day and Premium at $99 a month ($1,068 a year) for 50,000; Enterprise is custom. Checked 15 October 2026.

Is AbuseIPDB trustworthy?

It's an established service: its FAQ says Marathon Studios Inc., based in Pennsylvania, has maintained it since March 2016. Its scores come from user reports, weighted by how many distinct users reported an address and how recently, with a small extra weight for verified webmasters. Reports can be wrong, so treat a score as evidence to check, not a verdict.

Does AbuseIPDB have an API?

Yes. AbuseIPDB's free API handles both checking and reporting IP addresses. Regular accounts get 1,000 requests a day, verified webmasters 3,000 and supporters 5,000, according to its FAQ, and the limits reset at midnight UTC. Paid plans raise it to 10,000 (Basic) or 50,000 (Premium) checks a day. The webmaster tier is what the DNS record on these domains unlocks.

Why do websites have an abuseipdb-verification TXT record?

Because the owner verified the domain with AbuseIPDB, usually to become a verified webmaster: 3,000 API requests a day instead of 1,000, and slightly more weight for their reports. The record stays in DNS after it has done its job. On 15 October 2026, 2,628 of the 2,649 domains in our clean set still carried it.

AbuseIPDB Overview
Customers
2,642
Companies Analyzed
1,808
Market Share
2.06%
Category Rank
#7
Top Country
United States
Top Industry
IT Services and IT Consulting
AbuseIPDB Customer ICP

Based on 1,808 company data

Company Size
1-10 employees (42.57%)
Location
United States, then Germany and UK
Industry
IT services, hosting, software
Founded
2010-2019 (31.78%)
Signal
Sysadmin running and reporting from own servers
About Our Data

These insights include all TechnologyChecker.io detections of AbuseIPDB (free & paid plans).

Total Detections2.08B
Detection History+20 Years
Domains Crawled29.9M
Technologies44K+
Company Match Rate68.4%