
Companies Using Crazy Egg
We detect Crazy Egg on 122,407 domains, which makes it the third-largest technology in Heatmaps & Session Recording with a 7.2% share of a category of 34 tracked tools spanning roughly 1.70 million domains. Below is the breakdown of the companies using Crazy Egg - country, company size, industry, founding decade and the rest of their stack - drawn from 32,366 enriched company profiles.
This page used to report 28,857 domains. That number and the one above are not comparable. Crazy Egg was previously tracked under a legacy technology id that our current detection cluster does not carry at all. The profile has been re-pointed to the live id, re-measured from scratch, and moved out of Web Analytics into Heatmaps & Session Recording - the category the vendor's detection rule actually sits in, and a fairer description of what the product does. The 4.2x difference is a change of measurement, not a change in adoption. Figures on this page were read in September 2026.
Published Apr 11, 2026 · Updated Sep 13, 2026 · Data analysed on September 13, 2026.
Crazy Egg Usage Statistics
Crazy Egg's detection history on this page is short by design: the current cluster holds four monthly readings, from 71,801 active domains in June 2026 to 122,407 in September 2026. That rise is not growth. Our crawled corpus expanded from roughly 201 million to 379 million active domains across the same window, so very nearly every technology we track gained detections in that period whether or not it gained a single customer. The honest reading is that our coverage of Crazy Egg widened, and the September figure is the first taken at full corpus width. Separately, 10,258 domains that carried Crazy Egg earlier in the window no longer do - roughly 8% of the current base, which is a low churn ratio for a JavaScript tag and consistent with a snippet that stays on a page until somebody deliberately removes it.
List of Companies Using Crazy Egg
Download all 122,407 Crazy Egg customers with full company data, or create a signal to track when companies start or stop using Crazy Egg.
| Company | Detection URL | Domain | Country | Industry | Employees | Type | Founded | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| uceap.universityofcalifornia.edu | universityofcalifornia.edu | United States | Higher Education | 10001+ | Educational | — | https://linkedin.com/company/university-of-california | |
| wholesale.orange.com | orange.com | France | Telecommunications | 10001+ | Public Company | 1988 | https://linkedin.com/company/orange | |
| axisbank.com | axisbank.com | India | Banking | 10001+ | Public Company | 1994 | https://linkedin.com/company/axis-bank | |
| jobs.rbc.com | rbc.com | Canada | Banking | 10001+ | Public Company | 1864 | https://linkedin.com/company/rbc | |
| live.novartis.com | novartis.com | Switzerland | Pharmaceutical Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1996 | https://linkedin.com/company/novartis | |
| careers.astrazeneca.com | astrazeneca.com | United Kingdom | Pharmaceutical Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1999 | https://linkedin.com/company/astrazeneca | |
| www.careers.philips.com | philips.com | Netherlands | Hospitals and Health Care | 10001+ | Public Company | 1891 | https://linkedin.com/company/philips | |
| sutherlandglobal.com | sutherlandglobal.com | United States | IT Services and IT Consulting | 10001-10001 | Privately Held | 1986 | https://linkedin.com/company/sutherland-global | |
| remax.com | remax.com | United States | Real Estate | 201-500 | Public Company | 1973 | https://linkedin.com/company/remax | |
| etisalat.ae | etisalat.ae | United Arab Emirates | Telecommunications | 10001-10001 | Public Company | — | https://linkedin.com/company/eanduae |
Show 40 more Crazy Egg using companies as demo data
| Company | Detection URL | Country | Industry | Employees | Type | Founded | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| grupobimbo.com | grupobimbo.com | Central African Republic | Food and Beverage Services | 10001-10001 | Privately Held | — | https://linkedin.com/company/grupobimbo | |
| blogs.worldbank.org | worldbank.org | United States | International Trade and Development | 10001+ | Nonprofit | 1944 | https://linkedin.com/company/the-world-bank | |
| www.worley.com | worley.com | Australia | Professional Services | 10001+ | Public Company | 1971 | https://linkedin.com/company/worley | |
| news.umich.edu | umich.edu | United States | Higher Education | 10001+ | Educational | 1817 | https://linkedin.com/company/university-of-michigan | |
| help.ea.com | ea.com | United States | Entertainment Providers | 10001+ | Public Company | 1982 | https://linkedin.com/company/electronic-arts | |
| centene.com | centene.com | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 10001+ | Public Company | 1984 | https://linkedin.com/company/centene-corporation | |
| uw.edu | uw.edu | United States | Higher Education | 10001+ | Educational | — | https://linkedin.com/company/university-of-washington | |
| gradschool.psu.edu | psu.edu | United States | Higher Education | 10001+ | Educational | 1855 | https://linkedin.com/company/penn-state-university | |
| nih.gov | nih.gov | United States | Biotechnology Research | 10001+ | Government Agency | 1887 | https://linkedin.com/company/national-institutes-of-health | |
| roberthalf.com | roberthalf.com | United States | Staffing and Recruiting | 10001+ | Public Company | 1948 | https://linkedin.com/company/robert-half-international | |
| www.tevapharm.com | tevapharm.com | Israel | Pharmaceutical Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1901 | https://linkedin.com/company/teva-pharmaceuticals | |
| osu.edu | osu.edu | United States | Higher Education | 10001+ | Educational | 1870 | https://linkedin.com/company/the-ohio-state-university | |
| www.dce.harvard.edu | harvard.edu | United States | Higher Education | 10001+ | Educational | — | https://linkedin.com/company/harvard-university | |
| news.synopsys.com | synopsys.com | United States | Software Development | 10001+ | Public Company | 1986 | https://linkedin.com/company/synopsys | |
| globant.link | globant.link | United States | IT Services and IT Consulting | 10001+ | Public Company | 2003 | https://linkedin.com/company/globant | |
| goodyear.com | goodyear.com | United States | Motor Vehicle Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1898 | https://linkedin.com/company/goodyear | |
| maestriasydiplomados.tec.mx | tec.mx | Mexico | Higher Education | 10001-10001 | Educational | 1943 | https://linkedin.com/company/tecdemonterrey | |
| persistent.com | persistent.com | India | IT Services and IT Consulting | 10001+ | Public Company | 1990 | https://linkedin.com/company/persistent-systems | |
| buenosaires.gob.ar | buenosaires.gob.ar | Argentina | Government Administration | 10001+ | Government Agency | — | https://linkedin.com/company/gobierno-de-la-ciudad-de-buenos-aires | |
| business.purdue.edu | purdue.edu | United States | Higher Education | 10001+ | Educational | 1869 | https://linkedin.com/company/purdue-university | |
| events.ubc.ca | ubc.ca | Canada | Higher Education | 10001+ | Educational | 1915 | https://linkedin.com/company/universityofbc | |
| www.hackensackmeridianhealth.org | hackensackmeridianhealth.org | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 10001+ | Nonprofit | 2016 | https://linkedin.com/company/hackensackmeridianhealth | |
| buffettinstitute.nebraska.edu | nebraska.edu | United States | Higher Education | 10001+ | Educational | 1892 | https://linkedin.com/company/university-of-nebraska | |
| www.ibex.co | ibex.co | United States | Outsourcing/Offshoring | 10001+ | Public Company | 2002 | https://linkedin.com/company/ibex-global | |
| jobs.mdanderson.org | mdanderson.org | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 10001+ | Educational | 1944 | https://linkedin.com/company/mdandersoncancercenter | |
| penntoday.upenn.edu | upenn.edu | United States | Higher Education | 10001+ | Educational | — | https://linkedin.com/company/university-of-pennsylvania | |
| sedgwick.com | sedgwick.com | United States | Insurance | 10001+ | Privately Held | 1969 | https://linkedin.com/company/sedgwick | |
| compre.seara.com.br | seara.com.br | Brazil | Food and Beverage Manufacturing | 10001-10001 | Privately Held | — | https://linkedin.com/company/-seara | |
| centennial.ncsu.edu | ncsu.edu | United States | Higher Education | 5001-10000 | Educational | 1887 | https://linkedin.com/company/north-carolina-state-university | |
| research.arizona.edu | arizona.edu | United States | Higher Education | 10001+ | Educational | 1890 | https://linkedin.com/company/uarizona | |
| bajajauto.com | bajajauto.com | India | Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1945 | https://linkedin.com/company/bajaj-auto-ltd | |
| www.sanlam.co.za | sanlam.co.za | South Africa | Financial Services | 10001+ | Privately Held | 1918 | https://linkedin.com/company/sanlam | |
| appen.com | appen.com | United States | IT Services and IT Consulting | 501-1000 | Public Company | 1996 | https://linkedin.com/company/appen | |
| www.worldfinancialgroup.com | worldfinancialgroup.com | United States | Financial Services | 201-500 | Public Company | 2001 | https://linkedin.com/company/world-financial-group-wfg | |
| raisingcanes.com | raisingcanes.com | United States | Restaurants | 10001+ | Privately Held | 1996 | https://linkedin.com/company/raising-cane's | |
| pe.gatech.edu | gatech.edu | United States | Higher Education | 5001-10000 | Educational | 1888 | https://linkedin.com/company/georgia-institute-of-technology | |
| www.stpetersburg.usf.edu | usf.edu | United States | Higher Education | 10001+ | Educational | 1956 | https://linkedin.com/company/usouthflorida | |
| www.sas.com | sas.com | United States | Software Development | 10001+ | Privately Held | 1976 | https://linkedin.com/company/sas | |
| firstcitizens.com | firstcitizens.com | United States | Banking | 10001+ | Public Company | 1898 | https://linkedin.com/company/first-citizens-bank | |
| jeffersonhealth.org | jeffersonhealth.org | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 5001-10000 | Nonprofit | — | https://linkedin.com/company/jefferson-health |
There are 122,407 companies and domains where we detect Crazy Egg, sign up to download the entire Crazy Egg dataset.
Recognisable brands using Crazy Egg in our September 2026 detection set, with the host the tag was actually found on:
- AstraZeneca - detected on careers.astrazeneca.com
- RBC - detected on jobs.rbc.com
- Philips - detected on www.careers.philips.com
- Electronic Arts - detected on help.ea.com
- The World Bank - detected on blogs.worldbank.org
- Orange - detected on wholesale.orange.com
- Novartis - detected on live.novartis.com
- University of Michigan - detected on news.umich.edu
- SAS - detected on www.sas.com
- Axis Bank - detected on axisbank.com
- Re/Max - detected on remax.com
The pattern is consistent: with a handful of exceptions the tag sits on a careers site, a newsroom, a help centre or a campus property rather than the corporate homepage. Universities are conspicuous - Michigan, Penn State, Purdue, Ohio State, UBC, Georgia Tech and others all appear, usually on a departmental, admissions or events subdomain. A detection is evidence the snippet was served on that host, nothing more; it is not a statement about the size or status of the account behind it.
Which Countries Use Crazy Egg the Most?
Which countries use Crazy Egg the most? The United States, by a distance: 20,681 of the 32,366 enriched companies are US-based, a little under two thirds of the enriched set. The United Kingdom (1,944), Canada (1,657) and Australia (1,466) follow, so four English-speaking markets account for 25,748 enriched profiles between them. Outside that group the tail is thin and unusually spread: India (582), Brazil (424), Spain (420) and New Zealand (386) all sit ahead of Germany (248) and France (224). For a product sold in English on a self-serve motion, that is the expected shape - adoption follows the marketing language rather than market size.
Share of the 32,366 Crazy Egg domains we matched to a company record — 26.4% of the 122,407 we detect. Top 15 countries shown, so these do not sum to 100%. Domains with no matching company record are not represented here and skew small and independent.
Crazy Egg Market Share Among Heatmaps & Session Recording
Crazy Egg holds a 7.2% share of Heatmaps & Session Recording and ranks third of 34 tracked technologies in a category covering roughly 1.70 million domains. The shape of the category matters more than the rank. Microsoft Clarity (54.3%, 923,836 domains) and Hotjar (25.87%, 440,057 domains) hold over 80% of it between them, and Crazy Egg's 122,407 domains are the entire remainder of the top tier - 3.6x the next tool down, Contentsquare at 33,934. This is a two-giant market with a clear third place and a long, thin tail, not a five-way race. The ranking itself is new: until this refresh the profile was filed under Web Analytics, where a heatmap tool was always going to read as a rounding error.
Top Competitors by Market Share
Crazy Egg Customers by Company Size & Age
44.25% of Crazy Egg's enriched customers have 1-10 employees, and 74.34% have fewer than 50. Only 0.75% have 10,001 or more. That is the single clearest fact about this install base: Crazy Egg is bought by small teams that want a visual answer about one page without commissioning an analysis. Hold that number against the company table further down, where almost every recognisable name sits in the 10,001+ bracket. Those companies are the 0.75%, not the norm; the typical Crazy Egg domain belongs to a business with a handful of staff.
Company Size Distribution
Company Age (Founded Decade)
What Industries Use Crazy Egg the Most?
Real Estate leads at 5.51%, followed by Retail (4.53%), Construction (3.71%), Software Development (3.42%) and Advertising Services (3.19%). What stands out is how flat that is: no industry clears 6%, and the tenth-placed vertical (IT Services and IT Consulting, 2.64%) is within three points of the first. Crazy Egg is horizontal in the strict sense - nothing about the product or its pricing selects for a sector.
Real estate businesses using Crazy Egg are the largest single vertical at 5.51% (1,564 companies), which fits a market where the product page is the listing and small agencies compete on presentation. Retail follows at 4.53% (1,284) and Construction at 3.71% (1,053). Construction is a genuinely unusual entry for a behavioural analytics tool and reads as local contractors optimising a quote form rather than a checkout. Healthcare appears twice in the top ten - Medical Practices (3.01%) and Hospitals and Health Care (2.90%) - which is 5.91% combined if you treat the two as one sector, enough to lead the table.
Crazy Egg Alternatives & Competitors
Crazy Egg sits third in a category with two very large incumbents. Microsoft Clarity holds 54.3% (923,836 domains) and is free, which is the most important single fact about this market. Hotjar holds 25.87% (440,057 domains). Crazy Egg's 122,407 domains put it clearly behind both and clearly ahead of everything else: Contentsquare (33,934), FullStory (26,519) and Lucky Orange (26,413) are each about a quarter of its size or less. One number complicates the usual framing, though. Hotjar is detected alongside Crazy Egg on 64.31% of Crazy Egg's domains. The closest competitor is mostly not displacing it; it is mostly sitting next to it. Heatmap tools are cheap enough and narrow enough that running two is a normal outcome rather than an anomaly.
| Technology | Domains | Market Share |
|---|---|---|
| 923,836 | 54.3% | |
| 440,057 | 25.87% | |
| 33,934 | 1.99% | |
| 26,519 | 1.56% | |
| 26,413 | 1.55% |
Tech Stack of Crazy Egg-Powered Websites
The most distinctive fact in Crazy Egg's stack data is mechanical rather than strategic. Google Tag Manager appears on 98.36% of its domains and Google Analytics on 97.77%. Both are far above a normal pairing rate - typical co-occurrence for these two sits somewhere in the 45-60% band - and the explanation is the install path. Crazy Egg is most often deployed as a Google Tag Manager tag rather than hard-coded into the page template, so a site running Crazy Egg almost always runs GTM, and a site running GTM almost always has Google Analytics in it too. Read that as a property of how the snippet reaches the page, not as evidence of a shared platform or a single agency's client fleet. Beyond those two, HubSpot (66.21%) is the most common marketing platform, which is the conversion-focused stack you would expect, and the front-end mix skews modern: Tailwind CSS at 66.58% against Bootstrap at 13.65%.
Heatmaps & Session Recording
Web Analytics
Tag Management
Marketing Automation
UI & CSS Frameworks
Crazy Egg Customer Reviews with Pros and Cons
The G2 feedback summarised below clusters on two themes. The praise is about approachability: ease of use is the most-mentioned strength (12 mentions), ahead of quick setup of heatmaps and A/B tests (8) and the clarity of the click and heatmap reports (6). The criticism is almost entirely about ceilings rather than quality - session recording limits, filtering limitations on dynamic content and restricted data export each draw 4 mentions, and annual-only billing draws 2. That is a coherent picture of a tool people like and occasionally outgrow, and it is consistent with the install base above, where three quarters of customers have fewer than 50 employees.
Generated from real user reviews on G2
- Users find Crazy Egg to be extremely user-friendly, facilitating effortless analysis of user behavior and site optimization.(12 reviews)
- Users appreciate the quick and easy setup of heatmaps and A/B tests, with no complex configuration or coding required.(8 reviews)
- Users value Crazy Egg for its clear insights from heatmaps and click tracking, enhancing user experience and optimization.(6 reviews)
- Users enjoy the affordable pricing compared to competitors, with plans that work for small businesses and agencies.(6 reviews)
- Users praise the built-in A/B testing feature, which eliminates the need for a separate experimentation tool.(4 reviews)
- Users find the session recording limits restrictive, especially for high-traffic websites that need more data.(4 reviews)
- Users report filtering limitations when analyzing dynamic content, making it harder to gain specific insights.(4 reviews)
- Users find data export options limited, making it difficult to integrate Crazy Egg data with other analysis tools.(4 reviews)
- Users note that customer support response times can be slow, especially for non-enterprise plans.(3 reviews)
- Users find the annual billing requirement inconvenient, with no month-to-month payment option available.(2 reviews)
Expert Analysis: Crazy Egg Growth Trends & Key Signals for Sales Teams in 2026

This profile was rebuilt from scratch in September 2026. The first thing to explain is why its headline number moved, because if you saw this page earlier in the year it said something very different.
1. What changed on this page
Crazy Egg was previously tracked here under a legacy technology id that our current detection cluster does not contain at all. The profile has been re-pointed to the live id, re-measured and re-filed: the count moved from 28,857 to 122,407 domains, and the category moved from Web Analytics to Heatmaps & Session Recording.
The 4.2x difference is not adoption. The two figures come from different detection systems measuring different things, with no growth event between them, and nobody should build an argument on the gap. The category change is the more meaningful of the two corrections. Filed under Web Analytics, Crazy Egg was ranked against several hundred general analytics tools and looked like a rounding error at a fraction of a percent. Filed where the vendor's detection rule actually sits, it is third of 34 with a 7.2% share. Same product, same install base, different denominator - which is a useful reminder that a market share percentage is a statement about the category boundary at least as much as about the product.
2. How Crazy Egg is detected
Two signals identify it. The first is the JavaScript global CE2, which the Crazy Egg snippet defines. The second is a script source matching script\.crazyegg\.com/pages/scripts/\d+/\d+\.js. The second signal is the stronger of the pair: it is a vendor-owned host with a structured path, so a false match is hard to produce by accident. Both are page-surface signals, which sets the limits of everything below. A detection means the snippet was served on the page we fetched. It does not tell us whether the account behind it is paid, active, or being looked at by anyone, and no figure on this page should be read as a customer list.
3. The install base is small businesses, and old ones
44.25% of enriched customers have 1-10 employees and 74.34% have fewer than 50. Only 0.75% have 10,001 or more. Geographically it is an English-language product: 20,681 of 32,366 enriched companies are in the United States, and the UK, Canada and Australia take the next three places.
The founding-decade split is the part worth pausing on. The 2010s dominate at 32.44% and the 2000s add 20.73%, but the 2020s contribute only 7.65% - while businesses founded before 1960 account for 10.45%, more than the newest cohort. Crazy Egg is not what a company founded last year reaches for; it is what an established small business installs once it has enough traffic to argue about a page. That is a retention story and an acquisition problem at the same time.
4. Almost every Crazy Egg site runs Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager is present on 98.36% of Crazy Egg's domains and Google Analytics on 97.77%. Those numbers are far outside the normal band for either pairing, which usually lands somewhere between 45% and 60%, and a co-occurrence that extreme is worth interrogating before it is narrated, because the usual cause is a shared host, a template or a single agency's client fleet rather than anything about the product.
It is not that here. A random sample of detected domains was checked for a common platform: it returned independent small American businesses in unrelated trades - a church, car dealerships, a container supplier, estate agents, a staffing firm, a trucking company, retailers - on unrelated hosts, with no shared subdomain pattern between them. The base is genuinely independent.
The real explanation is the install path. Crazy Egg is most commonly deployed through Google Tag Manager rather than hard-coded into the page. The vendor documents a one-click GTM integration, it is the route that does not require a developer, and it is therefore the route a marketing team takes. A site running Crazy Egg nearly always runs GTM because GTM is usually how Crazy Egg got there; a site running GTM nearly always has Google Analytics in the same container. This says something about who buys the product - a marketer with container access, not an engineering team - and nothing at all about a shared platform.
5. Hotjar is a neighbour more often than a replacement
Hotjar is Crazy Egg's closest competitor by product and by size, at 440,057 domains to Crazy Egg's 122,407. It is also detected on 64.31% of Crazy Egg's own domains. Nearly two thirds of the sites running Crazy Egg are running its nearest rival alongside it.
This is why the profile carries no migration table. A switching corridor is only publishable when the data shows one product displacing another, and displacement cannot be inferred between two products that so plainly coexist - a count of sites that "moved" between them would mostly be counting sites that kept both, or sites where one tag was added for a single experiment and never removed. Across this refresh programme the only corridors to survive testing have been ones where two products cannot physically coexist, such as competing SEO plugins on a single WordPress install. Behavioural analytics is the opposite shape: the tools are cheap, narrow, and each answers a slightly different question, so stacking them is rational.
The competitive pressure in this category is real, but it comes from price and defaults rather than from head-to-head replacement. Microsoft Clarity holds 54.3% of the category on 923,836 domains and costs nothing.
6. Churn
10,258 domains have dropped Crazy Egg since coverage of it began in March 2026, roughly 8% of the current base. For a JavaScript tag that is a low figure, and it is worth being explicit about what it does and does not mean. A tag disappears when somebody removes it, when a site is rebuilt, when a container is cleaned out, or when the site itself goes away - a drop is not a cancellation, and we do not claim to know where any of those 10,258 went. The useful comparison is against tools whose detection depends on something fragile, such as a consent-gated tag or a rule that matches a version string; those can churn several times harder without a single customer changing their mind. Crazy Egg's signal is stable, so its churn number is closer to a real behaviour than an instrument artefact.
7. Reading the company table correctly
The named companies on this page - AstraZeneca, RBC, Philips, Electronic Arts, the World Bank, Novartis, a long list of universities - are all in the 10,001+ employee bracket, which is 0.75% of this install base. They are the exception the enrichment surfaces, not the customer. Look at the hosts rather than the names and a second pattern appears: careers.astrazeneca.com, jobs.rbc.com, help.ea.com, blogs.worldbank.org, news.umich.edu. Roughly half of the large-organisation detections are on a subdomain - a careers portal, a newsroom, a help centre, a campus or events property - not the corporate homepage. Heatmap tooling enters a large organisation the same way it enters a small one: one team, one property, one card. It does not imply an enterprise agreement, and it should not be quoted as one.
8. Key takeaways
1. The headline moved for measurement reasons. 28,857 and 122,407 come from different detection systems and different categories. Neither is evidence about adoption.
2. Third of 34, in a two-giant category. 7.2% behind Clarity at 54.3% and Hotjar at 25.87%, and 3.6x the fourth-placed tool.
3. The GTM number is an install-path artefact, not a platform. 98.36% GTM and 97.77% Google Analytics describe how the snippet gets on the page; the underlying domains are independent businesses.
4. Coexistence, not competition, with Hotjar. 64.31% overlap is why no migration corridor is published here.
5. Small, established, English-speaking. 74.34% under 50 employees, 20,681 of 32,366 enriched companies in the US, and a founding profile that skews to the 2010s and earlier rather than to new companies.
9. Sales applications
Who to approach. The 98.36% Google Tag Manager overlap is the most actionable line in this dataset, because it identifies the buyer rather than the company. A Crazy Egg detection effectively marks a marketing team with container access and a habit of adding measurement tools without an engineering ticket. Layer HubSpot (66.21%) on top and you have a conversion-focused marketing stack with a demonstrated willingness to buy small tools quickly.
Where the volume is. Filter on the industry mix rather than the logo wall: real estate (5.51%), retail (4.53%) and construction (3.71%) are the three largest verticals, all of them populated by businesses with fewer than 50 staff and a single page that matters commercially. The recognisable enterprise names are a thin tail and a slow sale.
What not to claim. Do not pitch against a migration story on this page - there isn't one, and two thirds of these sites are running Hotjar too. Do not read a subdomain detection at a large organisation as an enterprise relationship. And do not quote the June-to-September rise as growth: our corpus went from roughly 201 million to 379 million active domains over that window, so the curve is mostly our own coverage catching up.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who uses Crazy Egg?
We detect Crazy Egg on 122,407 domains, including University of California, Orange Group, Axis Bank. A detection means the technology is present on that domain, which for large organisations is often a single storefront or subdomain rather than a company-wide deployment. Among domains we matched to a company with a resolved industry, the most common is Real Estate (5.51%).
How many customers does Crazy Egg have?
We detect 122,407 domains running Crazy Egg across our monthly crawl of live business domains. Company data could be matched for 32,366 of them (26.4%), and every company-size, industry and country breakdown on this page describes that matched subset rather than the full detected base. A further 10,258 domains carried a Crazy Egg detection previously and no longer do.
What is Crazy Egg's market share?
Crazy Egg holds 7.2% of the Heatmaps & Session Recording category, ranking #3. This is a share of the domains we detect running a platform in this category — not a share of all websites, and not a share of spending — so it is not directly comparable to figures published on other denominators.
What are the best alternatives to Crazy Egg?
The top alternatives to Crazy Egg include Microsoft Clarity (54.3% market share), Hotjar (25.87% market share), Contentsquare (1.99% market share), FullStory (1.56% market share) — measured as a share of the domains we detect running a platform in this category.
Which countries use Crazy Egg the most?
United States leads with 20,681 matched Crazy Egg domains, followed by United Kingdom (1,944), Canada (1,657), Australia (1,466), India (582). These are counts within the 32,366 domains we could match to a company record, not the full detected base.
What size companies use Crazy Egg?
Small ones. Of the 32,366 enriched companies in our dataset, 44.25% have 1-10 employees and 74.34% have fewer than 50. Only 0.75% have 10,001 or more employees. The large, recognisable names listed on this page belong to that 0.75%, and are usually detected on a single subdomain such as a careers portal or newsroom rather than across the corporate estate.
How old are companies that use Crazy Egg?
Among the Crazy Egg domains we could match to a company with a known founding date, the largest group was founded in the 2010s (32.44%), followed by the 2000s (20.73%). That matched subset is drawn from 32,366 companies and is not representative of all 122,407 detected domains. This suggests Crazy Egg is most popular among relatively young companies.
What is the ideal customer profile for Crazy Egg?
The ideal Crazy Egg customer is: Company Size: 1-10 employees (44.25%), Location: United States, UK, Canada or Australia, Industry: Real estate, retail or construction, Founded: 2010-2019, Company Age: About 7-16 years old — based on our analysis of 32,366 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.
How many websites use Crazy Egg?
We detect Crazy Egg on 122,407 domains as of September 2026. That gives it a 7.2% share of the heatmaps and session recording category and third place out of 34 tracked technologies, behind Microsoft Clarity (923,836 domains) and Hotjar (440,057 domains). A detection means the Crazy Egg snippet was served on a page we crawled; it is a count of domains, not of accounts or paying customers.
Why did this page's Crazy Egg figure change from 28,857 to 122,407 domains?
Because the measurement changed, not the adoption. Crazy Egg was previously tracked under a legacy technology id that our current detection cluster does not contain at all, so the profile has been re-pointed to the live id and re-measured from scratch. The page also moved from Web Analytics to Heatmaps and Session Recording, the category the vendor's detection rule actually belongs to. The two figures come from different detection systems and should not be compared or presented as growth.
What does Crazy Egg do?
Crazy Egg provides heatmaps (click, scroll, confetti, overlay and list reports), session recordings, A/B testing, surveys, error tracking and popup CTAs, plus basic traffic analytics. The product is aimed at visualising how visitors behave on a page so that layout, copy and calls to action can be changed without writing code (source: crazyegg.com/overview).
How is Crazy Egg detected, and how is it usually installed?
We identify Crazy Egg from two signals: the JavaScript global CE2, which its snippet defines, and a script source matching script\.crazyegg\.com/pages/scripts/\d+/\d+\.js. On how it gets there, the data is unusually clear: Google Tag Manager is present on 98.36% of Crazy Egg's domains, far above the normal pairing rate, because Crazy Egg is most commonly deployed as a GTM tag rather than hard-coded into the page template.
Is Crazy Egg free?
No. Crazy Egg has no permanent free tier. Pricing starts at $29/month for Starter and runs to $599/month for Enterprise, billed annually, with plans separated by tracked pageviews and recording limits; all plans include unlimited domains and team members, and a 30-day trial is available (source: crazyegg.com/pricing). Its largest competitor, Microsoft Clarity, is free, which is the central commercial fact of this category.
Is Crazy Egg better than Hotjar?
Our data suggests that is often the wrong question. Hotjar is detected alongside Crazy Egg on 64.31% of Crazy Egg's domains, so nearly two thirds of Crazy Egg sites run both rather than choosing between them. On footprint, Hotjar is roughly 3.6x larger (440,057 domains against 122,407). On features, Crazy Egg bundles A/B testing and the Confetti report, which segments clicks by visitor type; Hotjar offers a free tier and automatic heatmaps. Many teams evidently find the two complementary enough to keep both.
How does Crazy Egg compare to Microsoft Clarity?
Microsoft Clarity is free and much larger: 923,836 domains against Crazy Egg's 122,407, roughly 7.5x, and 54.3% of the category to Crazy Egg's 7.2%. Crazy Egg charges from $29/month and bundles A/B testing, surveys, error tracking and popup CTAs, which Clarity does not offer (source: crazyegg.com/pricing). We publish no switching figures between the two, because heatmap tools coexist readily and a switching count between coexisting products cannot be measured honestly.
What are the best Crazy Egg alternatives?
By footprint in the same category: Microsoft Clarity (923,836 domains, 54.3%), Hotjar (440,057 domains, 25.87%), Contentsquare (33,934 domains, 1.99%), FullStory (26,519 domains, 1.56%) and Lucky Orange (26,413 domains, 1.55%). Clarity and Hotjar are the closest substitutes on features as well as the largest on footprint.
Can Crazy Egg replace Google Analytics?
In practice almost nobody treats it that way. Google Analytics is detected on 97.77% of the domains where we find Crazy Egg, so the two run side by side essentially everywhere. Crazy Egg does include traffic, referral and UTM reporting, which can cover simple reporting needs, but for funnels, cohorts or ecommerce tracking a dedicated analytics platform is still required.
What industries use Crazy Egg the most?
Real Estate leads at 5.51%, followed by Retail (4.53%), Construction (3.71%), Software Development (3.42%) and Advertising Services (3.19%). No industry clears 6%, and the tenth-placed vertical is within three points of the first, which makes Crazy Egg one of the more genuinely horizontal tools we track.
Do companies stop using Crazy Egg?
Some do. 10,258 domains that carried Crazy Egg have dropped it since our coverage of the technology began in March 2026, roughly 8% of the current base. That is a low churn ratio for a JavaScript tag. We deliberately do not publish where those domains went: a tag can disappear because it was removed, because the site was rebuilt, or because the site went away, and with Hotjar present on 64.31% of Crazy Egg domains any "switched to" figure would mostly be counting sites that kept both.
Who founded Crazy Egg?
Crazy Egg was co-founded in 2005 by Neil Patel, Hiten Shah and Rohan Thambrahalli. A coming-soon page collected roughly 23,000 email signups before launch (source: growthramp.io/articles/hiten-shah), and the product grew without outside funding. Neil Patel also co-founded KISSmetrics, Hello Bar and NeilPatel.com; Hiten Shah co-founded KISSmetrics, FYI and Nira.
Based on 32,366 company data
These insights include all TechnologyChecker.io detections of Crazy Egg (free & paid plans).