Contentsquare's tag is live on 34,664 websites in our October 2026 crawl, and we matched 19,587 of them to a company record. Those are the companies that use Contentsquare in the table below, from Toyota, Equifax and National Australia Bank to Accor's careers site and NVIDIA's documentation hub. Contentsquare's own company page says its insights are used on more than 1.3 million websites. Our number is narrower because it only counts sites loading the Contentsquare tag, not Hotjar's or Heap's, which we track as separate products.

That ownership matters if you're comparing tools. Contentsquare acquired Hotjar in 2021 and Heap in 2023, according to its company timeline, and about a third of Contentsquare sites (11,491 domains) also run Hotjar. In our Heatmaps & Session Recording table Contentsquare ranks 4th of 34 tools with 1.98% of tracked domains, behind Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar and Crazy Egg.

Published Aug 24, 2026 · Updated Oct 10, 2026 · Data analysed on October 10, 2026.

Share:

Contentsquare Usage Statistics

Contentsquare's tag is on 34,664 websites in October 2026, against 22,471 in June, 29,761 in July, 31,126 in August and 33,934 in September. That isn't a like-for-like series. The set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly found ones added, and the signals we detect Contentsquare with widen over time, so the climb since June mixes our coverage changing with real installs, and we can't separate the two. The base also churns underneath the headline: 9,447 domains have dropped the tag since our tracking of it began on 16 March 2026.

List of Companies Using Contentsquare

Our list of companies using Contentsquare on TechnologyChecker.io holds 19,587 matched records, and the table shows 50 brands that use Contentsquare. Many of the websites using Contentsquare here are a careers, docs or regional site rather than the main domain (careers.accor.com, docs.nvidia.com, careers.merckgroup.com, jobs.ssmhealth.com), which usually means one team bought it. Before naming anyone we opened 72 of the pages behind this list in a browser: 16 blocked us, 4 didn't load, and the Contentsquare tag fired on 43 of the 52 that opened.

Download all 34,664 Contentsquare customers with full company data, or create a signal to track when companies start or stop using Contentsquare.

Verified list of companies and domains where we detect Contentsquare — sorted by company size. Companies matched to domains where we detect Contentsquare; a detection may be one storefront rather than a company-wide deployment.
CompanyDetection URLDomainCountryIndustryEmployeesTypeFoundedLinkedIn
Ford logoFord
ford.comford.comUnited StatesMotor Vehicle Manufacturing10001+Public Company1903https://linkedin.com/company/ford-motor-company
General Motors logoGeneral Motors
experience.gm.comgm.comUnited StatesMotor Vehicle Manufacturing10001+Public Company—https://linkedin.com/company/general-motors
AccorHotels logoAccorHotels
careers.accor.comaccor.comFranceHospitality10001+Public Company1967https://linkedin.com/company/accor
Scotia logoScotia
bs.scotiabank.comscotiabank.comCanadaBanking10001+Public Company1832https://linkedin.com/company/scotiabank
Cisco Systems logoCisco Systems
www.cisco.comcisco.comUnited StatesSoftware Development10001+Public Company1984https://linkedin.com/company/cisco
Spectrum logoSpectrum
spectrum.comspectrum.comUnited StatesTelecommunications10001+Public Company1993https://linkedin.com/company/spectrum
Salesforce, Inc. logoSalesforce, Inc.
www.salesforce.comsalesforce.comUnited StatesSoftware Development10001+Public Company1999https://linkedin.com/company/salesforce
Fidelity Investments logoFidelity Investments
www.fidelity.comfidelity.comUnited StatesFinancial Services10001+Privately Held1946https://linkedin.com/company/fidelity-investments
Philips logoPhilips
www.careers.philips.comphilips.comNetherlandsHospitals and Health Care10001+Public Company1891https://linkedin.com/company/philips
Lloyds Banking Group PLC logoLloyds Banking Group PLC
lloydsbankinggroup.comlloydsbankinggroup.comUnited KingdomFinancial Services10001+Public Company—https://linkedin.com/company/lloyds-banking-group
Show 40 more Contentsquare using companies as demo data
CompanyDetection URLCountryIndustryEmployeesTypeFounded
Kohl’s Corp. logoKohl’s Corp.
cs.kohls.comkohls.comUnited StatesRetail10001+Public Company1962https://linkedin.com/company/kohls-department-stores
Siemens Healthineers AG logoSiemens Healthineers AG
cancercare.siemens-healthineers.comsiemens-healthineers.comGermanyHospitals and Health Care10001+Public Company—https://linkedin.com/company/siemens-healthineers
Edward Jones logoEdward Jones
www.edwardjones.comedwardjones.comUnited StatesFinancial Services10001+Privately Held1922https://linkedin.com/company/edward-jones
NVIDIA Corporation logoNVIDIA Corporation
docs.nvidia.comnvidia.comUnited StatesComputer Hardware Manufacturing10001+Public Company1993https://linkedin.com/company/nvidia
Almarai Co logoAlmarai Co
www.almarai.comalmarai.comSaudi ArabiaFood and Beverage Services10001+Public Company1977https://linkedin.com/company/almarai
National Australia Bank Ltd. logoNational Australia Bank Ltd.
www.nab.com.aunab.com.auAustraliaBanking10001+Public Company1858https://linkedin.com/company/nab
Vivo logoVivo
store.vivo.com.brvivo.com.brBrazilTelecommunications10001+Public Company1998https://linkedin.com/company/vivo-telefonicabr
Amdocs Group logoAmdocs Group
www.amdocs.comamdocs.comUnited StatesSoftware Development10001+Public Company1982https://linkedin.com/company/amdocs
MSC logoMSC
www.msc.commsc.comSwitzerlandTransportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage10001+Privately Held1970https://linkedin.com/company/msc-mediterranean-shipping-co--s-a-
Merck KGaA logoMerck KGaA
careers.merckgroup.commerckgroup.comGermanyPharmaceutical Manufacturing10001+Public Company1668https://linkedin.com/company/merck-group
Compass logoCompass
compass.comcompass.comUnited StatesReal Estate1001-5000Public Company2012https://linkedin.com/company/compassinc
Japan Tobacco International logoJapan Tobacco International
www.jti.comjti.comSwitzerlandTobacco Manufacturing10001+Public Company1999https://linkedin.com/company/jti
Chanel Inc. logoChanel Inc.
chanel.comchanel.comUnited KingdomRetail Luxury Goods and Jewelry10001+Privately Held—https://linkedin.com/company/chanel
Workday, Inc. logoWorkday, Inc.
blog.workday.comworkday.comUnited StatesSoftware Development10001+Public Company2005https://linkedin.com/company/workday
Motorola, Inc. logoMotorola, Inc.
en-us.support.motorola.commotorola.comUnited StatesComputers and Electronics Manufacturing1001-5000Public Company1928https://linkedin.com/company/motorola-mobility
Principal Financial Services, Inc. logoPrincipal Financial Services, Inc.
principal.comprincipal.comUnited StatesFinancial Services10001+Public Company1879https://linkedin.com/company/principalfinancialgroup
Unisys logoUnisys
japan.unisys.comunisys.comUnited StatesIT Services and IT Consulting10001+Public Company—https://linkedin.com/company/unisys
NXP Semiconductors NV logoNXP Semiconductors NV
media.nxp.comnxp.comNetherlandsSemiconductor Manufacturing10001+Public Company2006https://linkedin.com/company/nxp-semiconductors
Carrier Corp logoCarrier Corp
productregistration.carrier.comcarrier.comUnited StatesWholesale Building Materials10001+Public Company—https://linkedin.com/company/carrier
Discover Financial Services logoDiscover Financial Services
www.discover.comdiscover.comUnited StatesFinancial Services10001+Public Company1985https://linkedin.com/company/discover
Toyota Motor logoToyota Motor
www.toyota.comtoyota.comUnited StatesMotor Vehicle Manufacturing10001+Public Company1957https://linkedin.com/company/toyota-north-america
Republic Services Inc logoRepublic Services Inc
www.republicservices.comrepublicservices.comUnited StatesEnvironmental Services10001+Public Company1998https://linkedin.com/company/republic-services-inc
MSK logoMSK
library.mskcc.orgmskcc.orgUnited StatesHospitals and Health Care10001+Nonprofit1884https://linkedin.com/company/memorial-sloan-kettering-cancer-center
SSM Health logoSSM Health
jobs.ssmhealth.comssmhealth.comUnited StatesHospitals and Health Care10001+Nonprofit1872https://linkedin.com/company/ssm-health-care
Rodan & Fields, LLC logoRodan & Fields, LLC
rodanandfields.comrodanandfields.comUnited StatesManufacturing201-500Privately Held2000https://linkedin.com/company/rodan-fields
Atlassian Corp. logoAtlassian Corp.
marketplace.atlassian.comatlassian.comAustraliaSoftware Development10001+Public Company2002https://linkedin.com/company/atlassian
American Family Insurance Company logoAmerican Family Insurance Company
www.amfam.comamfam.comUnited StatesInsurance10001+Privately Held1927https://linkedin.com/company/american-family-insurance
Equifax Inc. logoEquifax Inc.
www.equifax.comequifax.comUnited StatesFinancial Services10001+Public Company1899https://linkedin.com/company/equifax
Ace Hardware Corporation logoAce Hardware Corporation
acehardware.comacehardware.comUnited StatesRetail5001-10000Privately Held1924https://linkedin.com/company/acehardwarecorp
MSC Cruises logoMSC Cruises
msccruises.commsccruises.comSwitzerlandTravel Arrangements10001+Privately Held1987https://linkedin.com/company/msc-cruises
Hallmark logoHallmark
www.hallmark.comhallmark.comUnited StatesRetail10001+Privately Held1910https://linkedin.com/company/hallmark-cards
Washingtonuniversity logoWashingtonuniversity
physicians.washu.eduwashu.eduUnited StatesHigher Education10001+Educational1853https://linkedin.com/company/washington-university-in-st-louis
Myntra Designs Private Limited logoMyntra Designs Private Limited
www.myntra.commyntra.comIndiaTechnology, Information and Internet1001-5000Privately Held2007https://linkedin.com/company/myntra
Duke logoDuke
admissions.duke.eduduke.eduUnited StatesHigher Education10001+Educational1924https://linkedin.com/company/duke-university
Kerzner International logoKerzner International
kerzner.comkerzner.comUnited Arab EmiratesHospitality10001+Privately Held1993https://linkedin.com/company/kerzner-international
First American logoFirst American
homewarranty.firstam.comfirstam.comUnited StatesFinancial Services10001+Public Company1889https://linkedin.com/company/first-american
Onsemi logoOnsemi
my.onsemi.comonsemi.comUnited StatesSemiconductor Manufacturing10001+Public Company1999https://linkedin.com/company/onsemi
Cimbniaga logoCimbniaga
www.cimbniaga.co.idcimbniaga.co.idIndonesiaBanking10001+Public Company1955https://linkedin.com/company/pt--bank-cimb-niaga-tbk
Lenskart Solutions Pvt logoLenskart Solutions Pvt
lenskart.comlenskart.comIndiaTechnology, Information and Internet10001+Privately Held2008https://linkedin.com/company/lenskart-com
Unibo logoUnibo
www.unibo.itunibo.itItalyHigher Education5001-10000Educational1088https://linkedin.com/company/unibo

There are 34,664 companies and domains where we detect Contentsquare, sign up to download the entire Contentsquare dataset.

Recognisable companies using Contentsquare and brands using Contentsquare in 2026, each checked in a browser in October:

  • Toyota: Contentsquare loads on toyota.com, Toyota's US consumer site
  • Accor: the hotel group runs Contentsquare on careers.accor.com
  • NVIDIA: Contentsquare measures the docs.nvidia.com documentation hub
  • Equifax: Contentsquare runs on www.equifax.com
  • National Australia Bank: Contentsquare on nab.com.au
  • Scotiabank: Contentsquare on its Bahamas personal banking site
  • Atlassian: Contentsquare on the Atlassian Marketplace
  • Philips: Contentsquare on the Philips careers site
  • Lenskart: Contentsquare on lenskart.com
  • Kerzner International: the resort operator runs Contentsquare on kerzner.com

Which Countries Use Contentsquare the Most?

Which countries use Contentsquare the most? The United States, with 6,119 of the 19,587 companies we matched (31.24%), then the United Kingdom (2,062) and Australia (1,185). France, where Contentsquare was founded in 2012, is 4th with 812, ahead of Canada (724), Brazil (715) and the Netherlands (695). Add up the European countries in our top 15 (the UK, France, the Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Spain, Italy, Belgium and Switzerland) and you get 5,713 companies, not far short of the US total.

🇺🇸United States6,11931.2%
🇬🇧United Kingdom2,06210.5%
🇦🇺Australia1,1856.0%
🇫🇷France8124.1%
🇨🇦Canada7243.7%
🇧🇷Brazil7153.7%
🇳🇱Netherlands6953.5%
🇩🇪Germany6063.1%
🇮🇳India5752.9%
🏳️Poland4072.1%
🇪🇸Spain4022.1%
🇮🇹Italy3001.5%
🇧🇪Belgium2251.1%
🇲🇽Mexico2231.1%
🇨🇭Switzerland2041.0%

Share of the 19,587 Contentsquare domains we matched to a company record — 56.5% of the 34,664 we detect. Top 15 countries shown, so these do not sum to 100%. Domains with no matching company record are not represented here and skew small and independent.

Contentsquare Market Share Among Heatmaps & Session Recording

What is Contentsquare's market share? 1.98% of the Heatmaps & Session Recording category, 4th of the 34 tools we track there, based on our crawl at TechnologyChecker.io. Share here counts websites, not contract value, which is why two tools that cost nothing to start sit far ahead: Microsoft Clarity, free, on 955,921 domains (54.69%) and Hotjar, which has a free plan, on 443,151 (25.35%). Crazy Egg is 3rd with 123,670, but its count still includes parked for-sale pages we haven't removed yet, so treat that gap as approximate.

Customers34.7KCompanies using Contentsquare
Companies Analyzed19.6KWith LinkedIn company data
Market Share1.98%Of the category market
Category Ranking#4In its category

Top Competitors by Market Share

Contentsquare Customers by Company Size & Age

Is Contentsquare only for enterprises? Not when you count websites. Of the 18,834 matched companies with a known headcount, 8,881 (47.15%) have 1 to 10 staff and 5,186 (27.54%) have 11 to 50. Only 2,103 (11.17%) employ more than 200, and 146 more than 10,000. Contentsquare's pricing page lists a free plan with 200k monthly sessions, so a small site carrying the tag isn't necessarily a paying enterprise account.

Company Size Distribution

Company Age (Founded Decade)

Most matched companies are young. Of the 12,563 matched companies with a founding year, 4,379 (34.86%) started in the 2010s and 2,991 (23.81%) in the 2020s; add the 2000s (16.5%) and 75.17% were founded since 2000. The older end is small but familiar: 711 companies (5.66%) predate 1960, among them Philips, Scotiabank and Merck KGaA.

What Industries Use Contentsquare the Most?

Which industries use Contentsquare for digital experience monitoring? No single one dominates. Software Development leads at 5.48% (998 companies), then Retail at 5.28%, IT Services and IT Consulting at 4.18%, Technology, Information and Internet at 3.24% and Financial Services at 3.22%. The ten industries in the chart together cover 33.68% of matched companies in our enriched company data, so this is a horizontal purchase rather than a vertical one.

Software Development998 (5.48%)
Retail962 (5.28%)
IT Services and IT Consulting761 (4.18%)
Technology, Information and Internet591 (3.24%)
Financial Services587 (3.22%)
Real Estate552 (3.03%)

Retail brands using Contentsquare are 5.28% of matched companies, and 7.45% (1,358) once Retail Apparel and Fashion (2.17%) is added; Lenskart, the Indian eyewear chain, is one. Financial services companies on Contentsquare include Equifax and Edward Jones, with Scotiabank, National Australia Bank and CIMB Niaga counted under Banking. Healthcare and university sites using Contentsquare form a cluster of their own in the named list: Siemens Healthineers, SSM Health, Duke's admissions site and WashU Medicine's physician pages all load the tag.

Contentsquare Alternatives & Competitors

Who are Contentsquare's main competitors? On this table the tools above it are usually a second tag on the same sites, not a replacement. 8,199 domains run Contentsquare and Microsoft Clarity together right now, and Hotjar, a Contentsquare product since 2021, shares 11,491. Heap, bought in 2023, appears on 1,358 Contentsquare domains. Below Contentsquare the paid recorders are smaller: FullStory with 26,974 domains (1.54%) and Lucky Orange with 26,443 (1.51%). The one rival whose corridor passes our switching test is Decibel, which Medallia bought in 2021.

TechnologyDomainsMarket Share
A favicon of Microsoft Clarity
Microsoft Clarity
955,92154.69%
A favicon of Hotjar
Hotjar
443,15125.35%
A favicon of Crazy Egg
Crazy Egg
123,6707.07%
A favicon of FullStory
FullStory
26,9741.54%
A favicon of Lucky Orange
Lucky Orange
26,4431.51%

Contentsquare Customer Migration

Which tools do sites switch to from Contentsquare? Only one pair passes our switching test, and it's small. Since tracking began in March 2026, 31 domains dropped Contentsquare and now run Decibel (8 in the last 30 days, 26 in the last 90), while 11 went the other way (2 and 9). Bigger flows don't qualify. 1,505 domains that dropped Contentsquare still run Microsoft Clarity, but 8,199 of the 11,718 domains ever seen with both still run both, so we read Clarity as a tag that sits beside Contentsquare rather than one that replaces it.

Switched to Contentsquare
Left Contentsquare
CompetitorGainedLostNet
A favicon of Decibel
Decibel
+2
-8
-6

Tech Stack of Contentsquare-Powered Websites

Google Tag Manager runs on 88.22% of the 35,025 live Contentsquare domains in our stack analysis, and Google Analytics on 86.44%, so the tag usually goes in through a container the marketing team already controls. Consent tools are common: OneTrust 7.02%, CookieYes 5.38%, Cookie Control 4.81% and Cookiebot 4.57%. Testing tools are thin by comparison, with Optimizely on 3.38%, VWO on 2.36% and Adobe Target on 1.98%. On the commerce side Shopify shows up on 18.14% and WooCommerce on 6.2%.

Tag Management

A favicon of Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager
30,899 (88.22%)
A favicon of Adobe DTM
Adobe DTM
995 (2.84%)
A favicon of Tealium
Tealium
382 (1.09%)
Adobe Experience Cloud
138 (0.39%)

Web Analytics

A favicon of Google Analytics
Google Analytics
30,274 (86.44%)
A favicon of Cloudflare Browser Insights
Cloudflare Browser Insights
3,662 (10.46%)
A favicon of Adobe Analytics
Adobe Analytics
1,110 (3.17%)
A favicon of Site Kit
Site Kit
1,021 (2.92%)
A favicon of Snowplow Analytics
Snowplow Analytics
743 (2.12%)

Consent & Privacy Management

A favicon of OneTrust
OneTrust
2,460 (7.02%)
A favicon of CookieYes
CookieYes
1,883 (5.38%)
A favicon of Cookie Control
Cookie Control
1,686 (4.81%)
A favicon of Cookiebot
Cookiebot
1,601 (4.57%)
A favicon of Complianz
Complianz
823 (2.35%)
A favicon of TrustArc
TrustArc
471 (1.34%)

A/B Testing & Experimentation

A favicon of Optimizely
Optimizely
1,183 (3.38%)
A favicon of Trident AB
Trident AB
967 (2.76%)
A favicon of VWO
VWO
825 (2.36%)
A favicon of Adobe Target
Adobe Target
695 (1.98%)
A favicon of AB Tasty
AB Tasty
305 (0.87%)
A favicon of Statsig
Statsig
262 (0.75%)

Ecommerce Platforms

A favicon of Shopify
Shopify
6,352 (18.14%)
A favicon of WooCommerce
WooCommerce
2,171 (6.2%)
A favicon of Instafeed
Instafeed
1,053 (3.01%)
A favicon of Cart Functionality
Cart Functionality
586 (1.67%)
A favicon of Squarespace Commerce
Squarespace Commerce
565 (1.61%)
A favicon of Magento
Magento
501 (1.43%)

Contentsquare Customer Reviews with Pros and Cons

G2 reviewers praise how readable Contentsquare's output is, with easy-to-understand insights (40 mentions) and intuitive analytics (32) at the top, then name its depth as the problem: complex features (11) and the learning curve (10) are among the most-cited complaints, next to missing comparison views (11). None of the top five complaints is about price, so the objection to plan for is time to value rather than budget.

Generated from real user reviews on G2

Pros
  • Reviewers most often praise easy-to-understand insights. The output lands in a form non-analysts can act on, which is what makes it shareable across a team.(40 reviews)
  • The intuitive analytics interface draws steady praise. Reviewers describe following a behaviour question through the product without needing an analyst to build the report first.(32 reviews)
  • Ease of use comes up repeatedly given how deep the platform goes. Reviewers contrast it with enterprise tools that demand a specialist to operate.(32 reviews)
  • Reviewers value the intuitive customer understanding the platform produces, and ecommerce teams in particular tie it to decisions they went on to make about specific pages.(22 reviews)
  • In-depth journey analysis is the capability reviewers name when they explain why they chose Contentsquare over a lighter tool: seeing the whole path, not one page in isolation.(20 reviews)
Cons
  • Complex features are the most common complaint. The depth that reviewers praise elsewhere is the same depth that slows down anyone learning the product.(11 reviews)
  • Reviewers point to missing features, most often around comparison views, where they want to hold two segments or periods side by side and cannot.(11 reviews)
  • Some reviewers find the complexity overwhelming without formal training, particularly on the technical setup rather than day-to-day analysis.(10 reviews)
  • Frustrating interactions with engagement maps come up, along with requests for clearer notice when dashboards change underneath them.(10 reviews)
  • The learning curve is called out as genuinely demanding. Reviewers describe needing real time with the advanced modules before the platform pays off.(10 reviews)

Expert Analysis: Contentsquare Growth Trends & Key Signals for Sales Teams in 2026

David Thomson
David ThomsonCTO, TechnologyChecker

I've spent a decade building web crawlers, and with a tag like Contentsquare's the first job is to say exactly what we're counting. A domain counts here when its pages load a script from contentsquare.net or set up Contentsquare's configuration object. As of our October 2026 crawl that gives 34,664 live domains, of which we matched 19,587 to a company record. Before naming anyone below, we opened the pages in a browser: the tag fired on 43 of the 52 listed pages that loaded, and most of the pages that didn't load sat behind bot walls.

1. Growth trajectory

The chart reads 22,471 in June 2026, 29,761 in July, 31,126 in August, 33,934 in September and 34,664 in October. I wouldn't pitch that to anyone as a growth curve. The domains we crawl turn over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly found ones added, and the signals we detect Contentsquare with widen over time, so part of the rise is our coverage changing. The churn is easier to read: 9,447 domains have dropped the tag since we started tracking it on 16 March 2026, which is about 27% of today's base. That's a lot of movement under a headline that only goes up.

"A rising line and 9,447 departures can both be true. For a seller, the departures are the more useful number." - David Thomson, CTO at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales Signal: Treat the Contentsquare base as a pool that refills rather than one that compounds. Timing matters more than market growth, so watch for domains that add or drop the tag and work those first.

2. Customer profile

Contentsquare's best-known accounts are enterprises, and the named ones here bear that out: Toyota on toyota.com, Equifax, National Australia Bank, Accor's careers site, Merck KGaA's careers site and NVIDIA's documentation hub all loaded the tag when we checked. Contentsquare's own customer stories feature Bloom & Wild, OLLY and Olaplex, and the tag loads on all three of those sites too. But headcount tells a different story at scale. Of the 18,834 matched companies with a known size, 47.15% have 1 to 10 staff and 27.54% have 11 to 50. Only 2,103 (11.17%) employ more than 200.

Part of the explanation is on Contentsquare's pricing page, which lists a Free plan with 200k monthly sessions, a self-serve Growth plan and two sales-led tiers. A small site with the tag may never have signed a contract. Age points the same way: 75.17% of matched companies with a founding year started in 2000 or later (34.86% in the 2010s, 23.81% in the 2020s, 16.5% in the 2000s), while 711 predate 1960.

Sales Signal: Split the list before you work it. Filter to 201+ employees and you have 2,103 companies that look like Contentsquare's enterprise buyers; the rest are better approached as self-serve users who may outgrow the free tier.

3. Industry and geographic concentration

Software Development leads at 5.48%, Retail follows at 5.28%, and nothing else clears 4.2%. The top ten industries add up to only 33.68% of matched companies. That's a tool bought for a type of website, one with journeys worth measuring, and not for a type of business. Geography is more concentrated. The United States has 6,119 of the 19,587 matched companies (31.24%), the United Kingdom 2,062 and Australia 1,185. France, Contentsquare's home since 2012, is 4th with 812. European countries in our top 15 come to 5,713 companies once the UK is included, close to the US figure.

Sales Signal: Brazil (715 companies, with Vivo's online store among them) and India (575, including Lenskart) are each about a third the size of the UK cohort and big enough to prospect on their own. Localised implementation help is the likely opening there.

4. Migration patterns

This is where I'd be most careful with the numbers. Analytics tags stack, so a site that drops one tool while running another hasn't necessarily switched. We only publish a corridor when most of the domains ever seen with both tools no longer run both. One pair passes: 31 domains dropped Contentsquare and now run Decibel (8 in the last 30 days, 26 in the last 90), and 11 went the other way. Decibel has been part of Medallia since 2021, according to CX Today, so that small corridor is a contest with Medallia's experience analytics.

The big flows fail the test. 1,505 domains that dropped Contentsquare still run Microsoft Clarity, and 559 went the other way, but 8,199 of the 11,718 domains ever seen with both still run both. With Hotjar the overlap is heavier still: 11,491 of 14,814 still run both. Both pairs are stacked tools, and the Hotjar pair sits inside one company's portfolio. Neither is a departure.

"When a third of your sites also run your other product, the overlap tells you how the portfolio is used. It isn't churn." - David Thomson, CTO at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales Signal: For a competing vendor, the Clarity overlap is the opening: 8,199 domains already run a free recorder beside Contentsquare and may be asking whether they need both. For a Contentsquare partner, the Hotjar overlap marks accounts that could be consolidated onto one platform.

5. Technology ecosystem

Across the 35,025 live domains in our stack analysis, Google Tag Manager is on 88.22% and Google Analytics on 86.44%. The tag mostly arrives through a container marketing already owns. Consent tools are well represented: OneTrust 7.02%, CookieYes 5.38%, Cookie Control 4.81%, Cookiebot 4.57%. Session replay records real behaviour, so consent tooling in the same stack is no surprise.

Testing is the gap. Optimizely appears on 3.38%, VWO on 2.36%, Adobe Target on 1.98% and AB Tasty on 0.87%. The vendors Contentsquare integrates with show up less than you'd guess too: Qualtrics runs on 519 Contentsquare domains (1.48%) and Dynatrace on 379 (1.08%), even though Contentsquare's partner pages for Qualtrics XM and Dynatrace describe working integrations with both. Shopify sits on 18.14% of the base, the biggest commerce platform in it.

Sales Signal: Experimentation and feedback tools are the upsell. Contentsquare shows where a journey breaks; on most of these sites nothing in the stack tests the fix or asks the visitor why.

6. G2 review signals

The G2 reviews in the panel above split in two. The pros are about clarity: easy-to-understand insights (40 mentions), intuitive analytics (32) and ease of use (32). The cons are about depth: complex features (11), missing comparison views (11), complexity without training (10) and the learning curve (10). Not one top complaint is about price. Set that against our size data, where 74.69% of matched companies with a known headcount have 50 or fewer staff, and the risk is plain: many of these sites have no analyst to climb that learning curve.

Sales Signal: Lead with time to value. Training, managed analysis and implementation help answer the objection reviewers raise, and they fit the small teams that make up most of this list.

7. Key takeaways

1. Position: 4th of 34 in Heatmaps & Session Recording at 1.98%, behind Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar and Crazy Egg and ahead of FullStory (1.54%) and Lucky Orange (1.51%).
2. Phase: a large, churning base. 9,447 domains dropped the tag since March 2026 even as the total rose.
3. Archetype: two populations, enterprise accounts on careers, docs and regional sites, and a long tail of small sites on lighter plans.
4. Portfolio: Hotjar shares 11,491 domains and Heap 1,358, so the company is bigger in this market than its own row.
5. Vulnerability: Microsoft Clarity, which Microsoft markets as free forever, sits beside it on 8,199 domains.

8. Sales applications

Outreach angle: "Your site runs Contentsquare through Google Tag Manager, but we don't see a testing tool. Contentsquare can show where visitors drop off; without a way to test the fix, the insight stalls." That message fits most of the base: the six testing tools in our stack table (Optimizely, Trident AB, VWO, Adobe Target, AB Tasty and Statsig) add up to 12.1% even if no site ran two of them, so at least 87.9% of Contentsquare domains run none of them.

Targeting strategy: Filter this list to 201+ employees, then to the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlands, where Contentsquare already has 2,062, 812 and 695 matched companies.

Competitive angle: The 8,199 domains running both Contentsquare and Clarity have two recorders on the same site. That's either a consolidation pitch or a retention risk, depending on which side you sell for.

Everything here comes from TechnologyChecker.io's October 2026 crawl: 34,664 live Contentsquare domains and 19,587 matched companies, measured against the full set of technologies we track across the web.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who uses Contentsquare?

34,664 websites load Contentsquare's tag in our October 2026 crawl, and we matched 19,587 of them to companies. Named users we checked in a browser include Toyota, Equifax, National Australia Bank, Accor's careers site, NVIDIA's docs and the Atlassian Marketplace. By headcount the base is mostly small: 47.15% of matched companies with a known size have 1 to 10 staff.

How many customers does Contentsquare have?

Contentsquare's own AI info page lists 1,700+ clients and 1.3M+ SMB clients. Our crawl measures something narrower: 34,664 websites loading the Contentsquare tag itself in October 2026, with 19,587 matched to a company record. Hotjar and Heap, both Contentsquare products, are tracked separately, and 9,447 domains have dropped the Contentsquare tag since our tracking began in March 2026.

What is Contentsquare's market share?

Contentsquare holds 1.98% of the Heatmaps & Session Recording category in our October 2026 data, 4th of the 34 tools we track there. The share counts websites, so tools that are free to start lead: Microsoft Clarity has 54.69% and Hotjar 25.35%. Hotjar has been a Contentsquare product since 2021, so the company's real footprint in this category is far larger than its own row.

What are the best alternatives to Contentsquare?

Inside its category the usual shortlist is Microsoft Clarity, which is free, plus FullStory, Lucky Orange, Crazy Egg, Quantum Metric and Glassbox. Hotjar and Heap are alternatives only on paper, because Contentsquare owns both. In our data the one switching corridor that holds up runs to Decibel: 31 domains since March 2026, with 11 moving back.

Which countries use Contentsquare the most?

The United States leads with 6,119 of the 19,587 companies we matched to Contentsquare (31.24%), then the United Kingdom with 2,062 and Australia with 1,185. France, where Contentsquare was founded in 2012, is 4th with 812, ahead of Canada (724), Brazil (715) and the Netherlands (695). European countries in our top 15 add up to 5,713 companies.

What size companies use Contentsquare?

Mostly small ones, by count. Of 18,834 matched companies with a known headcount, 47.15% have 1 to 10 employees and 27.54% have 11 to 50. Only 2,103, or 11.17%, have more than 200 staff, and 146 have more than 10,000. Contentsquare also sells a free plan with 200k monthly sessions, so a small site can carry the tag without an enterprise contract.

How old are companies that use Contentsquare?

Among the Contentsquare domains we could match to a company with a known founding date, the largest group was founded in the 2010s (34.86%), followed by the 2020s (23.81%). That matched subset is drawn from 19,587 companies and is not representative of all 34,664 detected domains. This suggests Contentsquare is most popular among relatively young companies.

What is the ideal customer profile for Contentsquare?

The ideal Contentsquare customer is: Company Size: 1-10 employees (47.15%), Location: US, UK, Australia, France, Founded: 2010-2019 (34.86%), Industry: Software, retail, IT services, Deployed Via: Google Tag Manager (88.22%) — based on our analysis of 19,587 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.

Which industries use Contentsquare for digital experience monitoring?

No single industry dominates. Software Development is largest at 5.48% of matched companies, followed by Retail at 5.28%, IT Services and IT Consulting at 4.18%, Technology, Information and Internet at 3.24% and Financial Services at 3.22%. The top ten industries add up to only 33.68%, so you find the tag at banks like Scotiabank and retailers like Lenskart alike.

Who owns Contentsquare?

Contentsquare was founded in Paris in 2012 by Jonathan Cherki, who is listed as Founder and CEO on its company page. It's venture-funded, reporting $1.4B raised since 2017, and the investors it lists include Sixth Street Growth, Highland Europe, BlackRock, Eurazeo, Canaan and SoftBank. It is an owner itself too: Hotjar was acquired in 2021 and Heap in 2023.

Is Hotjar part of Contentsquare?

Yes. Contentsquare's company timeline lists the acquisition of Hotjar in 2021, and its Hotjar page says Hotjar is now part of Contentsquare. We still detect them separately because each loads its own tag. In our October 2026 data Hotjar runs on 443,151 domains and Contentsquare on 34,664, and 11,491 live Contentsquare domains carry both tags at once.

What is the difference between Contentsquare and Qualtrics?

Qualtrics is built around customer feedback, while Contentsquare shows what visitors do on a page. Contentsquare's partner directory describes a two-way Qualtrics XM integration that embeds session replay inside Qualtrics. In our crawl 519 of the 35,025 live Contentsquare domains, about 1.48%, also run Qualtrics, so most Contentsquare sites don't pair the two on the same website.

What is the difference between Contentsquare and Dynatrace?

Dynatrace watches technical performance and Contentsquare watches visitor behaviour, and the vendors sell them as a pair. Contentsquare's partner page says Dynatrace alerts you when issues occur, while Contentsquare shows what the user was doing before and during the error. In our crawl 379 of 35,025 live Contentsquare domains (1.08%) also run Dynatrace's tag, and 290 run Dynatrace RUM.

How much does Contentsquare cost?

Contentsquare's pricing page lists four plans. Free includes 200k monthly sessions, Growth is self-serve and starts from 7k monthly sessions, and Pro and Enterprise are sold through a demo. Cost depends on sessions and on which products you add, so the page offers a cost slider rather than one list price. A tag on a small site therefore doesn't prove a paid contract.

What type of company is Contentsquare?

Contentsquare calls itself an all-in-one experience intelligence platform covering session replay, heatmaps, journey analysis, Voice of Customer and product analytics. Its company page says the Contentsquare, Heap and Hotjar products were brought together in one platform in 2024. It was founded in Paris in 2012, reports 1,800+ employees, and ranks 4th of 34 tools in our session recording category.

Who are Contentsquare's technology partners?

Contentsquare runs a partner directory at partners.contentsquare.com, and its technology partners include Qualtrics XM and Dynatrace, each with a documented integration. Our crawl shows what its customers run beside it: Google Tag Manager on 88.22% of live Contentsquare domains, Google Analytics on 86.44%, OneTrust on 7.02% and Optimizely on 3.38%, out of 35,025 domains in our stack analysis.

What are companies switching to from Contentsquare?

Very few make a clean switch. The only corridor passing our test runs to Decibel, Medallia's product: 31 domains dropped Contentsquare for it since March 2026, against 11 moving the other way. 1,505 domains that dropped Contentsquare still run Microsoft Clarity, but 8,199 of the 11,718 domains ever seen with both still run both, so Clarity usually sits beside it.

Contentsquare Overview
Customers
34,664
Companies Analyzed
19,587
Market Share
1.98%
Category Rank
#4
Top Country
United States
Top Industry
Software Development
Contentsquare Customer ICP

Based on 19,587 company data

Company Size
1-10 employees (47.15%)
Location
US, UK, Australia, France
Founded
2010-2019 (34.86%)
Industry
Software, retail, IT services
Deployed Via
Google Tag Manager (88.22%)
About Our Data

These insights include all TechnologyChecker.io detections of Contentsquare (free & paid plans).

Total Detections2.08B
Detection History+20 Years
Domains Crawled29.9M
Technologies44K+
Company Match Rate56.5%