Mailchimp vs MailerLite
We Measured 321 Switches to MailerLite in 90 Days: Pricing, Features & Adoption Data (2026)
Compared on our own monthly crawl of 29.9M live business domains, both vendors' pricing pages read on Aug 25, 2026 and 6,541 G2 reviews.
Published Aug 30, 2026Updated Aug 30, 2026August 2026 crawl
Mailchimp
82
domains gained from MailerLite in 90 days
MailerLite
321
domains gained from Mailchimp in 90 days
Choose Mailchimp if…
- You need the 300+ integration catalogue, including Salesforce, Square and LinkedIn Lead Gen Forms
- You run several distinct audiences and want them separated by default
- You want phone support and a partner-led migration, which only the Premium plan includes
Choose MailerLite if…
- Your list is under 500 contacts and the free plan has to carry automations, a landing page and a website
- Price per send decides: unlimited emails on Power for $25 a month, 10% less on annual billing
- You publish a newsletter, sell digital products or run paid subscriptions from the same tool
How we collect this data
Every number names its source and the date it was read.
MailerLite is winning the switchers between these two email platforms: 321 domains moved from Mailchimp to MailerLite in the 90 days to August 25, 2026, against 82 the other way, a 3.9 : 1 flow in MailerLite's favour. Mailchimp still runs on 4.3x more websites (526,676 detected domains to MailerLite's 122,973) and holds the #1 position in email marketing, so it remains the default for teams that need its 300+ integrations, several separate audiences and a Premium tier with phone support. MailerLite is the pick when the list is small, the budget is tight and the free plan has to do real work: 250 subscribers, 2,500 emails a month, automations, a landing page and a website for $0. At 500 contacts the paid entry points are $12 (MailerLite Comfort) and $13 (Mailchimp Essentials), so the price gap is narrow at the bottom and widens with volume, where Mailchimp's send caps and per-audience contact counting add up.
At a glance
August 2026 crawlWho is switching between Mailchimp and MailerLite?
Analysed Aug 25, 2026321domains moved from Mailchimp to MailerLite in the 90 days to Aug 25, 2026 · 82 went the other way · every switch we have recorded falls inside this window
Switched = dropped Mailchimp on every host we track since May 29, 2026 and currently runs MailerLite. A drop is a tag disappearing from our crawl, not a confirmed cancellation. 4,021 domains run both today. Counts are domains, not accounts.
“321 domains switched from Mailchimp to MailerLite in the 90 days to Aug 25, 2026 (TechnologyChecker, https://technologychecker.io/compare/mailchimp-vs-mailerlite)”
321 domains switched from Mailchimp to MailerLite in the last 90 days → See the list
31,680 domains have dropped Mailchimp since we began tracking it in March 2026. Most go to Klaviyo.
At 500 contacts, MailerLite Comfort is $12 a month ($10.80 on annual billing) and Power $25; Mailchimp Essentials starts at $13 and Standard at $20. Both are free up to 250 contacts. (checked Aug 25, 2026)
Mailchimp plans
| Plan | Monthly | Annual (per mo) | Includes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Not published | Up to 250 contacts, 500 sends a month (250 a day)1 seat · 1 audience · Email support for the first 30 days |
| Essentials | $13/mo | Not published | 500 contacts included; send limit 10x the contact count3 seats · 3 audiences · Automation flows up to 4 steps · $11.05 a month for 12 months on the introductory offer |
| Standard | $20/mo | Not published | 500 contacts included; send limit 12x the contact count5 seats · 5 audiences · Automation flows up to 200 steps with branching · $17 a month for 12 months on the introductory offer |
| Premium | $350/mo | Not published | 10,000 contacts included; send limit 15x the contact countPhone and priority support · Multivariate testing · Partner-led migration · $297.50 a month for 12 months on the 15% offer |
MailerLite plans
| Plan | Monthly | Annual (per mo) | Includes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free | Up to 250 subscribers, 2,500 emails a month2 seats · 1 website, 1 landing page, 3 active forms · 3 active automations of 5 steps · Community support |
| Comfort | $12/mo | $10.8/mo | Up to 500 subscribers, 5,000 emails a month (10x the tier)3 seats · 10 websites and landing pages · 50 active automations of 100 steps · 24/7 email support |
| Power | $25/mo | $22.5/mo | Up to 500 subscribers, unlimited emailsUnlimited seats, automations, forms and landing pages · Multiple automation triggers · 24/7 live chat and email support |
| Enterprise | Not published | Not published | 200K+ subscribers, custom pricingDedicated success manager · Dedicated IP as an add-on · Deliverability support |
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Visual automation builder | Essentials: 4 steps per flow; Standard and up: 200 steps with branching | Free: 3 automations of 5 steps; Comfort: 50 of 100 steps; Power: unlimited |
| Dynamic segmentation | Included; predictive segmentation on Standard and up | Included |
| Email templates | 100+ templates; the Free plan gets a subset | Limited on Free; full library on paid plans |
| Landing pages and websites | Forms and landing pages on every plan | 1 site and 1 landing page on Free, 10 on Comfort, unlimited on Power |
| A/B and multivariate testing | A/B testing on paid plans; multivariate on Premium | Email A/B testing on paid plans; multivariate on Comfort and up |
| Transactional email | Separate product (Mailchimp Transactional) | Transactional emails feature, via API |
| Integrations | 300+ | 100+ |
| Free plan | 250 contacts, 500 sends a month, 1 seat | 250 subscribers, 2,500 emails a month, 2 seats |
| Support | Email for 30 days on Free; 24/7 email and chat on Essentials and Standard; phone and priority on Premium | Community on Free; 24/7 email on Comfort; 24/7 live chat on Power |
| List hygiene and deliverability tools | Domain authentication; Intuit Assist content and send tools on paid plans | Email verifier for list cleaning; smart sending |
Adoption since Jun 2011
Monthly active domains from each technology's profile, starting Jun 2011, the first month both were tracked. The shaded band is a hole in our crawl (Jul 2025 to Jun 2026 has no monthly points); the lines break across it rather than being interpolated, and the months either side of the band are not directly comparable.
- DHL ExpressTransportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage
- University of CaliforniaHigher Education
- Upwork EnterpriseSoftware Development
- Honeywell International, Inc.Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing
- Burger King Company LLCRestaurants
- University of MichiganHigher Education
- UW groupHigher Education
- Arizona State UniversityHigher Education
- SapientBusiness Consulting and Services
- The University of MelbourneHigher Education
Share of each vendor's enriched companies in the segment. A gap is a lean, not a verdict; rows under 30 companies a side or under 5 pp are marked.
By company size
By industry
How buyers rate Mailchimp and MailerLite
G2, read Aug 29, 2026- Largest segment
- Small-Business, 72.1% of reviews
- Entry price on G2
- $0.00
- Free trial
- Available
- Plans listed
- 4 on G2
- Largest segment
- Small-Business, 91.8% of reviews
- Entry price on G2
- Free
- Free trial
- Available
- Plans listed
- 3 on G2
What else G2 puts on this comparison
| Product | Rating | Reviews | Largest segment |
|---|---|---|---|
| ActiveCampaign | 4.4 / 5 | 14,780 | Small-Business |
| Brevo Marketing Platform | 4.5 / 5 | 2,621 | Small-Business |
| SendPulse | 4.6 / 5 | 717 | Small-Business |
1 of 3 shortlisted alternatives is where domains actually go. G2 puts ActiveCampaign, Brevo Marketing Platform and SendPulse beside this pair. Of those, Brevo Marketing Platform also appears among the technologies Mailchimp leavers move to. The destinations we measure — Klaviyo, Mailgun, Sendgrid, Amazon SES and Brevo — lead with Klaviyo, which G2 does not shortlist here.
G2 scores features by category only when both products are rated on a shared feature set, and it publishes none for Mailchimp and MailerLite. The feature table above is ours, read off each vendor's own pages.
G2 also publishes an AI-generated summary and a set of generated FAQs for this pair. We link rather than reproduce them — they are machine-written, we cannot verify the claims in them, and the verdict and FAQs on this page are the editor's. Read G2's own comparison →
Mailchimp
What people like about Mailchimp. Ease of use is the most-cited strength on G2 (159 mentions), followed by email marketing itself (129), on the larger panel of the two: 5,428 reviews against MailerLite's 1,113. 72.1% of those reviews come from small businesses, which matches the profile data where 61% of its enriched base are companies of 1 to 10 people.
What people do not like. Price leads the complaints (56 mentions of Expensive), specifically the jump once a list grows past the free tier, followed by limited features (41). That second theme sits oddly beside the ease-of-use praise because the two describe different readers: beginners on the free plan who find the campaign editor simple, and teams that hit the 4-step automation limit on Essentials or the per-audience contact counting above it.
G2's own summary of the g2.com/products/intuit-mailchimp-all-in-one-marketing-platform listing, with each topic's mention count.
Generated from real user reviews on G2
- Users love the ease of use of Mailchimp, appreciating its flexibility and intuitive design for beginners.(223 reviews)
- Users appreciate the intuitive email marketing features of Mailchimp, which make campaign creation and customer engagement easier.(173 reviews)
- Users appreciate the easy-to-use email design features of Mailchimp, which help them run more effective marketing campaigns.(114 reviews)
- Users appreciate the intuitive and full-featured design of Mailchimp, which makes campaign management and creative work effortless.(114 reviews)
- Users love the easy creation process of Mailchimp, finding it intuitive for building campaigns and designs effortlessly.(109 reviews)
- Users find Mailchimp's pricing steep for larger subscriber lists, though the free plan is generous for small businesses.(69 reviews)
- Users find the limited features of Mailchimp frustrating, particularly with complicated navigation and insufficient customization options.(50 reviews)
- Users find missing features like direct resending and color-coded clickmaps hinder efficiency and add to costs.(50 reviews)
- Users find the learning curve steep, making it challenging to navigate and customize Mailchimp effectively.(42 reviews)
- Users find the limited customization in Mailchimp restricts their creativity and hampers effective email design.(36 reviews)
MailerLite
What people like about MailerLite. Ease of use leads again (43 mentions), but the second theme is customer support (37), which does not appear in Mailchimp's top four at all. Authors and creators show up by name in the reviews, matching the profile data where Professional Training and Coaching is a top-two industry. The panel is much thinner: 1,113 reviews to Mailchimp's 5,428.
What people do not like. The complaints are about depth rather than price: a learning curve (14 mentions) and missing features (13). Neither approaches the volume of Mailchimp's price complaint (56), and price does not appear in MailerLite's top four at all. The free tier carries community support only, so the support praise above sits on the paid plans.
G2's own summary of the g2.com/products/mailerlite listing, with each topic's mention count.
Generated from real user reviews on G2
- Users appreciate the ease of use of MailerLite, which makes it simple to communicate with their audience and get support when needed.(64 reviews)
- Users value the friendly and responsive customer support of MailerLite, noting that help is always available when needed.(62 reviews)
- Users value the user-friendly features of MailerLite, which allow authors to easily connect with their readers.(31 reviews)
- Users value the exceptional customer support of MailerLite, saying help is always available when needed.(31 reviews)
- Users love that MailerLite is affordable, making it accessible for small businesses and individual authors alike.(29 reviews)
- Users find the learning curve challenging with MailerLite, especially when setting up advanced automations and transitions.(19 reviews)
- Users find missing features like advanced automation flexibility and automatic logo addition to newsletters limiting MailerLite's potential.(17 reviews)
- Users struggle with email deliverability issues, often finding their messages landing in spam and experiencing subscriber management challenges.(15 reviews)
- Users experience poor customer support with MailerLite, particularly finding it hard to get help on the free plan.(14 reviews)
- Users find difficulty in moving elements within MailerLite, alongside challenges in setting up complex automations and account approval delays.(13 reviews)
The reviews and the switching data point the same way. Mailchimp's first complaint is price (56 mentions of Expensive), and 321 domains left it for the cheaper platform in 90 days. MailerLite's own complaints are about depth rather than cost, a learning curve (14) and missing features (13), and 82 domains went back to Mailchimp in the same window: a 3.9 : 1 balance, not a rout. The satisfaction scores agree, with MailerLite ahead on all 7 criteria and the widest gap on quality of support (9.3 to 8.3).

The switching number is the part of this page only TechnologyChecker can publish, so it deserves the most scrutiny. 321 domains dropping Mailchimp and now running MailerLite in 90 days is real movement, but it is small next to Mailchimp's 526,676 detected domains: about 0.06% of the base in a quarter. Read it as a direction, not a stampede. The 82 moving the other way show that MailerLite is not a one-way door either.
What the data does not say is why. The G2 complaints give the most likely answer (price once a list grows) and the company-size tables agree: MailerLite's enriched base skews even smaller than Mailchimp's, with 76% of companies at 1 to 10 people against 61%. Teams that switch are, on this evidence, small and cost-sensitive.
Where the crowd may be wrong: the reviews rate Mailchimp harder to learn than MailerLite, yet Mailchimp keeps the larger integration catalogue and the only Premium tier with phone support and a funded migration. A business that already runs Square, Salesforce or LinkedIn lead forms should weigh those integrations above the sticker price.
Who should pick neither: senders with transactional volume, who should look at Amazon SES, SendGrid or Mailgun (all three appear in both vendors' leaver tables), and ecommerce brands, where Klaviyo is the destination Mailchimp loses the most domains to.
How we compared · TechnologyChecker sells access to the switching lists behind this page; the numbers do not change with that.
Where this data comes from
August 2026 crawlOur detection dataFirst-party
The switching corridor, adoption curves, market shares and customer lists come from our own monthly crawl of 29.9M live business domains, detected across the full signal stack: HTTP headers, rendered DOM, JS globals, DNS, TLS and certificate transparency.
A switch is an observed change, not a survey answer: a domain dropped Mailchimp on every host we track and now runs MailerLite. Counts are domains, not accounts. Company attributes (industry, employee band, country) come from the enriched samples named in each caption (328,239 companies for Mailchimp, 80,110 for MailerLite).
Full detection methodology →The vendors' own pages
Pricing tables and the feature matrix are read from mailchimp.com and mailerlite.com, entered by hand and checked cell by cell by an editor. Every table names its source URL and the date it was verified.
A verification older than 90 days withdraws the page from search until an editor re-checks it, so a stale price cannot outrank a current one.
G2's published numbers
Star ratings, review counts, the seven satisfaction scores with respondent counts, segment shares and topic mention counts, as read on Aug 29, 2026. Numbers only: no review prose is reproduced, and every figure links back to G2's own comparison.
G2's comparison of this pair →Only the first column is ours alone: no other tracker publishes who is switching between Mailchimp and MailerLite. Where the sources disagree, the page says so next to the numbers rather than averaging them.
How many companies switched from Mailchimp to MailerLite?
321 domains dropped Mailchimp and now run MailerLite in the 90 days to August 25, 2026, against 82 that moved from MailerLite to Mailchimp. Counts are domains, not companies or contracts, and a drop means the Mailchimp tag disappeared from our crawl.
Why are people leaving Mailchimp?
The most common G2 complaint is price once a list grows past the free tier. Since March 2026 we have watched more than 31,000 domains drop Mailchimp; of those that adopted a rival, most went to Klaviyo (3,113), then Mailgun (814) and SendGrid (530). MailerLite took 321 in the last quarter.
Is MailerLite cheaper than Mailchimp?
At 500 contacts, MailerLite Comfort is $12 a month ($10.80 on annual billing) against Mailchimp Essentials at $13 and Standard at $20. Both have a free plan up to 250 contacts: MailerLite's allows 2,500 emails a month and automations, Mailchimp's 500 sends. MailerLite Power at $25 removes the send cap; Mailchimp's send caps scale with the contact count (10x to 15x).
Which is better for ecommerce, Mailchimp or MailerLite?
Neither leads on our data: Klaviyo is the destination both lose the most ecommerce-heavy domains to. Between the two, Mailchimp lists Shopify, WooCommerce, Square and Stripe among its 300+ integrations; MailerLite covers Shopify and WooCommerce among 100+ and adds selling digital products and paid newsletters without a commission.
Which is more widely used, Mailchimp or MailerLite?
Mailchimp, by 4.3x: 526,676 detected domains and 21.2% of the email marketing category against MailerLite's 122,973 and 5.0%, as of the August 2026 crawl.
Which is better, MailerLite or Mailchimp?
It depends on list size and budget, and the movement between them is one-sided: 321 domains dropped Mailchimp for MailerLite in the 90 days to August 25, 2026, against 82 going the other way. G2 reviewers agree, putting MailerLite ahead on all 7 satisfaction criteria, with the widest gap on quality of support (9.3 to 8.3). Mailchimp is still the larger platform by a distance, running on 526,676 detected domains to MailerLite's 122,973, and it keeps the deeper integration catalogue and the only tier with phone support.
Do companies still use Mailchimp?
Yes, and it remains the most detected email marketing platform we track: 526,676 domains in the August 2026 crawl, which is 21.24% of the category and the number 1 position. 31,680 domains have dropped it since we began tracking, so there is real churn underneath, but the base is more than four times MailerLite's.
Is there a better option than Mailchimp?
That depends what you are optimising for, and the domains that leave do not all go to MailerLite. Of the domains that dropped Mailchimp, the largest destination we measure is Klaviyo with 3,113, followed by Mailgun with 814, Sendgrid with 530, Amazon SES with 428 and Brevo with 390. Klaviyo tends to win ecommerce senders and the transactional services win senders whose volume is API-driven rather than campaign-driven.
How much does MailerLite cost?
MailerLite publishes a free plan for up to 250 subscribers with 2,500 emails a month, then Comfort at $12 a month for 500 subscribers ($10.80 on annual billing) and Power at $25 ($22.50 annual). Enterprise pricing above 200,000 subscribers is quoted rather than listed. Mailchimp's cheapest paid tier is Essentials at $13. Prices were read from each vendor's own pricing page on August 25, 2026.
What are the pros and cons of MailerLite?
In G2's own topic counts, reviewers most often name ease of use (43 mentions) and customer support (37) as strengths, and learning curve (14) and missing features (13) as complaints. That matches the ratings, where MailerLite leads Mailchimp on every criterion but rests on a much thinner panel: 1,113 reviews against 5,428.
Includes questions people also ask on Google for this comparison, quoted as Google shows them; the answers are ours, from the data on this page.