Companies Using PushPushGo

I expected PushPushGo to look like the other web push tools in our data: lots of small sites, a long global tail. It doesn't. Our October 2026 crawl counts a domain when its pages load a script from pushpushgo.com or link to one of its hosts. That finds 524 live domains, 217 of them matched to a company, 13th of 39 in Push Notifications. Poland alone holds 111 of those 217 companies, and the names at the top of the list are national news sites, banks and telecoms.

Domains, sites and projects

PushPushGo puts a project ID in its script address, so I could count accounts as well as domains. We read 336 project IDs on the live set. The biggest covers 9 domains, all Onet properties: onet.pl plus campaign and festival addresses that redirect to it. No agency or reseller runs one project across unrelated sites; the only platform account we found is Pakamera's, the Polish design marketplace, on three of its sellers' shop domains. The fleets that matter belong to publishers. 41 domains run the same page code as Onet, Ringier Axel Springer Polska's portal: Onet's sections, Medonet, Komputer Świat, Noizz, Forbes, Newsweek, Business Insider, Plejada and Przegląd Sportowy among them. They resolve to about a dozen publications, most with their own PushPushGo project. The dziennik.pl, gazetaprawna.pl, infor.pl and forsal.pl sites add 19 domains, and Net.hr with the local portals on net.hr addresses adds 16.

Merge www twins, redirecting aliases and domains that share a project, and the list comes down to about 360 separate sites. Two loan brokers account for 8 of the domains, each brand on four near-identical landing pages.

Sales signal: dedupe by project and by publisher group before you count accounts. One publisher group accounts for 41 rows.

Is it still running?

Before trusting the count I wanted to know whether the script still does anything. Of the 336 project IDs, 333 still serve a live project file; three return 404, so three domains carry a dead snippet. We then opened 50 random domains in a headless browser that accepted no cookies. 34 loaded a live project file, and 13 of those rendered PushPushGo's sign-up container. Nine more had the script in their HTML but didn't run it during the visit, which is what consent-gated tags do. Three blocked us, one didn't answer, and three showed no trace. That's 43 of the 46 reachable sites. Most projects name a service worker file, and of the 398 domains whose project does, 279 serve it at that path.

Sales signal: the install base works. A seller can assume the script is live on nearly every site in the list, and that someone there owns the subscriber list.

Growth trajectory

The chart reads 448 domains in June, 511 in July, 509 in August, 507 in September and 524 in October. The June to July step is ours: the set of domains we crawl turns over every month, dead sites out and new ones in, and the signals we detect PushPushGo with have widened. Since July the line has moved within 17 domains. Churn is low. 53 domains have dropped it since we began tracking on 16 March 2026, and 9 of those still run it on another hostname, so 44 left entirely.

"PushPushGo's customers aren't small sites trying web push for free. Almost a quarter employ more than 200 people, and media publishers make up the biggest group." - Elif Arslan, CMO & Co-founder at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales signal: about 360 sites, changing slowly. Work it as a named account list; nothing in the chart supports selling it internally as a growth segment.

Who the customers are

30.19% of matched companies with a known size have 1 to 10 employees. That's the lowest share among the 11 profiles in our Push Notifications category, where the rest run from iZooto's 34.81% to PushOwl's 66.62%, with OneSignal at 58.67%. At the other end, 23.12% have more than 200 staff; iZooto, at 22.56%, is the only other push tool we profile above 12%. The large names are real: Tía and Olímpica, with 5,001 to 10,000 staff each, VeloBank, DPD Polska, A1 Hrvatska and Slovenia's Merkur. They're also old. Only 6.87% of matched companies date from the 2020s, and Merkur (1896), Dnevnik (1951) and Olímpica (1953) are among the 7.63% founded before 1960.

Sales signal: the buyer is a digital or audience team inside an established company, often with its own ad sales. Start with the head of audience development.

Poland, the Balkans and a Latin American tail

Poland has 111 matched companies, Croatia 17, Serbia 12 and Slovenia 10. Slovakia's Zoznam, Montenegro's Vijesti and Latvia's Tele2 take it further. The United States has 7. Then comes a second cluster that surprised me: Colombia (4), Peru (3) and Ecuador (3), where Olímpica, Tía and Freeport are the retail names, plus Costa Rica's Teletica and Chile's Mora Pavic dental clinics. The industry mix matches that map: media labels add up to 28.72% of matched companies, and retail leads the single labels at 9.41%.

Sales signal: for anyone selling to Central European publishers, this list is a ready-made map of the audience teams that already buy third-party engagement tools. Outside Europe, the Latin American retailers are the segment to watch.

One push vendor per site

PushPushGo sites rarely mix vendors. Only 4 of the 529 domains in our stack sample also run OneSignal, and none runs any of the other 16 push tools we checked against it, including iZooto, Gravitec, Webpushr and Pushly. Our switching tests found no domain moving to or from PushPushGo since March. With so little overlap there's no corridor to measure, and I won't invent one from four rows.

"Web push on these sites is a single-vendor slot. Four domains out of 529 run a second push tool, so a rival has to replace PushPushGo rather than sit beside it." - Elif Arslan, CMO & Co-founder at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales signal: a rival's opening comes at contract renewal, and the subscriber list is the switching cost. PushPushGo's price list charges 500 EUR to export it.

The stack around it

Across the 529 domains in our stack sample, Google Publisher Tag runs on 43.1% and Prebid on 32.51%, so a large share sell display advertising; DoubleClick Floodlight, an advertiser's conversion tag, is on 56.71%. Gemius audience measurement is on 31.19%, DotMetrics on 8.13% and Marfeel on 14.74%. Consent tools are common: Funding Choices on 19.85%, Cookiebot and Cookie Control on 10.59% each, OneTrust on 9.26%, Didomi on 8.32%. WordPress is on only 19.47%, low for a publisher list, which suggests many run their own platforms. The shops split across WooCommerce (5.1%), Magento (4.73%), VTEX (3.59%) and Shoper (2.08%), a Polish store builder that PushPushGo lists as an integration.

Sales signal: consent decides whether the script runs at all. Consent-management and ad-tech vendors will find these sites already spending on both.

What it costs

PushPushGo's pricing page (15 October 2026) lists Basic at 59 EUR a month for on-site notifications and Pro at 149 EUR a month with 35,000 push subscribers, 3 automations and 3 projects; new users pay 49 EUR and 109 EUR for six months. Business (100,000 subscribers) and Enterprise (unlimited) are quoted, and mobile push adds a 549 EUR setup fee. There's no free plan, only a 14-day trial. The company was founded in 2017 and is registered in Kraków.

Sales signal: Pro's 35,000-subscriber cap is small for a national news site, so the big publishers here are probably on quoted plans, which makes them larger contracts than the domain count suggests.

Key takeaways

1. 524 live domains, about 360 separate sites, 13th of 39 in Push Notifications.

2. 333 of 336 project IDs are live, and 43 of 46 reachable sampled sites carry the script.

3. The biggest customers of the 11 push tools we profile: 23.12% have more than 200 staff.

4. Poland (111 of 217) and the former Yugoslav markets (39) dominate, with a Latin American retail tail.

5. Single-vendor sites: only 4 domains also run OneSignal.

How to use this list

Filter by country and company size, then group rows by publisher before you count accounts. For the full list of 524 PushPushGo domains with company, size and stack data, explore TechnologyChecker.io.