A favicon of Joomla

Companies Using Joomla

Companies using Joomla include some of the world's most prominent institutions. NATO, the Government of Canada, Fujitsu, and the United States Courts all run Joomla-powered sites. Our dataset tracks 111,637 active domains running Joomla, with 68,405 companies enriched with firmographic data on TechnologyChecker.io.

Joomla holds a 3.15% share of the CMS market, ranking #8. Unlike most technologies in our database, Germany (not the US) leads adoption at nearly 17% of all companies. Below you'll find the full breakdown by country, industry, company size, and technology stack.

Published Feb 28, 2026 · Updated Mar 3, 2026 · Data analysed on February 28, 2026.

Share:

Joomla Usage Statistics

Joomla has been tracked since September 2005, growing steadily to a peak of 111,737 active domains in December 2024. The total domain count peaked much earlier at 261,000 in late 2017 and has declined to 87,399 by mid-2025. With 543,163 domains that previously used Joomla, roughly 5 out of every 6 sites that ever ran it have since moved on. This pattern is consistent with the broader shift toward hosted CMS platforms tracked by TechnologyChecker.io.

List of Companies Using Joomla

Our verified list of companies using Joomla on TechnologyChecker.io is dominated by brands that use Joomla in the public and education sectors, from NATO and the Government of Canada to the University of Bologna (est. 1088) and Sapienza University of Rome. Many of the websites using Joomla in this database belong to institutions that chose the platform for open-source licensing, multilingual support, and self-hosting requirements.

Download all 111,637 Joomla customers with full company data, or create a signal to track when companies start or stop using Joomla.

Verified list of companies and websites using Joomla — sorted by company size. Data from TechnologyChecker's monthly crawl of 29.6M domains.
CompanyDetection URLDomainCountryIndustryEmployeesTypeFoundedLinkedIn
Government of Canada logoGovernment of Canada
indigenous-justice-strategy.canada.cacanada.caCanadaGovernment Administration10001+Government Agency1867https://linkedin.com/company/government-of-canada
Fujitsu logoFujitsu
fujitsu.comfujitsu.comJapanIT Services and IT Consulting10001+Public Company1935https://linkedin.com/company/fujitsu
Junta de Andalucía logoJunta de Andalucía
juntadeandalucia.esjuntadeandalucia.esSpainGovernment Administration10001+Government Agency1978https://linkedin.com/company/junta-de-andalucia
Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health logoRepublic of Turkey Ministry of Health
grip.saglik.gov.trsaglik.gov.trTurkeyHospitals and Health Care10001+Government Agency1923https://linkedin.com/company/saglikbakanligi
L3Harris Technologies logoL3Harris Technologies
tcpremier.l3harris.coml3harris.comUnited StatesDefense and Space Manufacturing10001+Public Company2019https://linkedin.com/company/l3harris-technologies
University of São Paulo logoUniversity of São Paulo
usp.brusp.brBrazilHigher Education10001+Educational1934https://linkedin.com/company/uspoficial
SPDM logoSPDM
spdm.org.brspdm.org.brBrazilHospitals and Health Care10001+Nonprofit1933https://linkedin.com/company/spdmoficial
Teachers Service Commission logoTeachers Service Commission
tsc.go.ketsc.go.keKenyaEducation Management10001+Government Agency1967https://linkedin.com/company/tsckenya
Safaricom logoSafaricom
safaricom.co.kesafaricom.co.keKenyaTelecommunications5001-10000Public Company1997https://linkedin.com/company/safaricom
Sapienza University of Rome logoSapienza University of Rome
ingmecc.uniroma1.ituniroma1.itItalyResearch Services10001+Educational1303https://linkedin.com/company/sapienzauniversitadiroma
Show 22 more Joomla using companies as demo data
CompanyDetection URLCountryIndustryEmployeesTypeFounded
University of Cincinnati logoUniversity of Cincinnati
classics.uc.eduuc.eduUnited StatesHigher Education5001-10000Educational1819https://linkedin.com/company/university-of-cincinnati
University of Bologna logoUniversity of Bologna
vision.deis.unibo.itunibo.itItalyHigher Education5001-10000Educational1088https://linkedin.com/company/unibo
IBGE logoIBGE
ibge.gov.bribge.gov.brBrazilGovernment Administration5001-10000Government Agency1936https://linkedin.com/company/ibgeoficial
McMaster University logoMcMaster University
aea.physics.mcmaster.camcmaster.caCanadaHigher Education5001-10000Educational1887https://linkedin.com/company/mcmaster-university
Universidad Complutense Madrid logoUniversidad Complutense Madrid
cultura.fis.ucm.esucm.esSpainEducation10001+Educational1499https://linkedin.com/company/mba-ucm
University of South Carolina logoUniversity of South Carolina
mysph.sc.edusc.eduUnited StatesHigher Education10001+Educational1801https://linkedin.com/company/uofsc
University of Houston logoUniversity of Houston
cpl.uh.eduuh.eduUnited StatesHigher Education10001+Educational1927https://linkedin.com/company/university-of-houston
University of Ottawa logoUniversity of Ottawa
uottawa.cauottawa.caCanadaHigher Education5001-10000Educational1848https://linkedin.com/company/uottawa
Bank Danamon logoBank Danamon
developer.danamon.co.iddanamon.co.idIndonesiaBanking10001+Public Company1956https://linkedin.com/company/bank-danamon-indonesia
Universidad de Guadalajara logoUniversidad de Guadalajara
udg.mxudg.mxMexicoEducation10001+Educationalhttps://linkedin.com/company/universidad-de-guadalajara_2
University of Southampton logoUniversity of Southampton
web-archive.southampton.ac.uksouthampton.ac.ukUnited KingdomHigher Education5001-10000Educational1862https://linkedin.com/company/university-of-southampton
University of Warwick logoUniversity of Warwick
annotate.warwick.ac.ukwarwick.ac.ukUnited KingdomHigher Education5001-10000Educational1965https://linkedin.com/company/uniofwarwick
Uppsala University logoUppsala University
ucr.uu.seuu.seSwedenHigher Education5001-10000Educational1477https://linkedin.com/company/uppsala-university
Bank BTPN logoBank BTPN
developers.btpn.combtpn.comIndonesiaBanking10001+Privately Held1958https://linkedin.com/company/pt-bank-btpn-tbk
United States Courts logoUnited States Courts
ord.uscourts.govuscourts.govUnited StatesAdministration of Justice10001+Government Agency1789https://linkedin.com/company/us-courts
University of Barcelona logoUniversity of Barcelona
ub.eduub.eduSpainResearch Services5001-10000Educational1450https://linkedin.com/company/university-of-barcelona
NATO logoNATO
events.sto.nato.intnato.intBelgiumInternational Affairs1001-5000Government Agency1949https://linkedin.com/company/nato
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais logoUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
ufmg.brufmg.brBrazilHigher Education5001-10000Educational1927https://linkedin.com/company/ufmg
Belgian Defence logoBelgian Defence
doccom.mil.bemil.beBelgiumArmed Forces10001+Government Agency1830https://linkedin.com/company/belgian-defence
Thrivent logoThrivent
dmemail.thrivent.comthrivent.comUnited StatesFinancial Services5001-10000Privately Held1902https://linkedin.com/company/thrivent
University of Brasília logoUniversity of Brasília
unb.brunb.brBrazilResearch Services1001-5000Educationalhttps://linkedin.com/company/universidade-de-bras-lia
FIMMG logoFIMMG
torino.ca.fimmg.orgfimmg.orgItalyPolitical Organizations11-50Government Agencyhttps://linkedin.com/company/fimmg

There are 111,637 companies and websites using Joomla, sign up to download the entire Joomla dataset.

Here are some of the most recognizable companies using Joomla and brands using Joomla in 2026:

  • Government of Canada – runs Joomla for its Indigenous Justice Strategy portal
  • NATO – uses Joomla for its Science & Technology Organization events platform
  • United States Courts – federal judiciary system using Joomla for court websites
  • Fujitsu – global IT services company (124,000+ employees) running Joomla on its corporate site
  • University of Bologna – the world's oldest university (est. 1088) using Joomla for departmental sites
  • Sapienza University of Rome – one of Europe's largest universities powered by Joomla
  • L3Harris Technologies – defense and aerospace company using Joomla for internal platforms
  • Safaricom – Kenya's largest telecom running Joomla on its corporate site
  • Belgian Defence – Belgium's armed forces using Joomla for official communications

Which Countries Use Joomla the Most?

Which countries use Joomla the most? Germany leads at 17% of all enriched companies (11,612), an unusual #1 position in our dataset, where the US typically dominates. The United States ranks second at 13% (8,894), followed by Italy (8.0%), France (4.9%), and the UK (4.7%). The DACH+Benelux region alone accounts for over 25% of all Joomla companies, reflecting the strong German-language open-source community and European public-sector mandates, based on our enriched company data.

🇩🇪Germany11,61224.5%
🇺🇸United States8,89418.7%
🏳️Italy5,47511.5%
🇫🇷France3,3247.0%
🇬🇧United Kingdom3,2316.8%
🇳🇱Netherlands3,1456.6%
🇪🇸Spain2,5265.3%
🇧🇷Brazil2,0804.4%
🏳️Switzerland1,6573.5%
🇦🇺Australia1,6503.5%
🏳️Poland1,5383.2%
🇨🇦Canada1,2162.6%
🏳️Belgium1,1222.4%

Joomla Market Share Among CMS

What is Joomla's market share? Joomla holds a 3.15% share of the CMS market, ranking #8, behind hosted builders like Squarespace (18.42%) and Wix (17.87%) but close to Duda (3.73%). Once the second-largest CMS after WordPress, Joomla now competes more directly with Drupal (2.57%) as both open-source platforms lose ground to no-code alternatives, based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains at TechnologyChecker.io.

Customers111.6KCompanies using Joomla
Companies Analyzed68.4KWith LinkedIn company data
Market Share3.15%Of the category market
Category Ranking#8In its category

Top Competitors by Market Share

Joomla Customers by Company Size & Age

Is Joomla only for small organizations? Mostly. 85% of Joomla customers have 10 or fewer employees, with another 8.8% at 11-50, putting 93.8% of the user base under 50 people, based on our analysis of 68,405 enriched companies. But the remaining 6.2% includes heavy hitters: NATO, Fujitsu, the Government of Canada, and multiple 10,001+ employee institutions that chose Joomla for its open-source licensing and self-hosting capabilities.

Company Size Distribution

Company Age (Founded Decade)

What Industries Use Joomla the Most?

Construction is the top industry at 4.95%, followed by Retail (3.80%) and Business Consulting (3.79%). The long tail is significant: no single industry exceeds 5%, indicating Joomla serves as a general-purpose CMS rather than a vertical-specific solution.

Construction2,515 (4.95%)
Retail1,931 (3.8%)
Business Consulting and Services1,924 (3.79%)
IT Services and IT Consulting1,734 (3.41%)
Medical Practices1,299 (2.56%)
Individual and Family Services1,202 (2.37%)

Construction companies using Joomla account for the platform's largest vertical at 4.95%, a surprising #1 for a CMS, likely driven by small contractors and builders who adopted Joomla early in the 2000s. IT Services firms on Joomla represent 3.41%, many of them web agencies that built client sites on the platform. Medical practices using Joomla at 2.56% reflects the CMS's appeal for data-sensitive organizations that prefer self-hosted, open-source solutions over cloud-hosted alternatives, based on our enriched company data.

Joomla Alternatives & Competitors

Joomla's competitive market has shifted dramatically over the past decade, based on our market share data across 50M+ crawled domains. Hosted builders like Squarespace (18.42%) and Wix (17.87%) now dominate the CMS market. Joomla's traditional rival Drupal (2.57%) has fallen below it, while Duda (3.73%) edges ahead. Both open-source CMS platforms are losing ground to no-code alternatives that don't require server management.

TechnologyDomainsMarket Share
A favicon of Squarespace
Squarespace
653,38718.42%
A favicon of Wix
Wix
634,02317.87%
A favicon of Duda
Duda
132,3683.73%
A favicon of Weebly
Weebly
91,3852.58%
A favicon of Drupal
Drupal
91,2862.57%

Joomla Customer Migration

The migration data from 68,405 enriched companies on TechnologyChecker.io is stark: Joomla lost 42,106 companies to WordPress while gaining only 8,459, a 5:1 loss ratio. That WordPress exodus is Joomla's single largest competitive challenge. Smaller but growing losses to Wix (net -2,610) and Squarespace (net -1,467) compound the trend toward hosted solutions. In the last year alone. 2,682 companies moved from Joomla to WordPress.

Switched to Joomla
Left Joomla
CompetitorGainedLostNet
A favicon of WordPress
WordPress
+8,459
-42.1k
-33,647
A favicon of Wix
Wix
+532
-3,142
-2,610
A favicon of Drupal
Drupal
+1,028
-980
+48
A favicon of Squarespace
Squarespace
+253
-1,720
-1,467
A favicon of TYPO3
TYPO3
+806
-416
+390
A favicon of Duda
Duda
+125
-820
-695
A favicon of Weebly
Weebly
+155
-340
-185

Tech Stack of Joomla-Powered Websites

Based on 68,405 enriched companies, Joomla's tech stack has a unique signature: 38.29% of Joomla sites use MooTools, the JavaScript framework bundled with Joomla's core, making it a reliable co-detection signal for our crawlers. Google Analytics (43.45%) is the most common analytics tool, while e-commerce overlap is notably low at just 1.49% for WooCommerce and 0.11% for Magento, reflecting Joomla's focus on content rather than commerce.

E-Commerce

A favicon of WooCommerce
WooCommerce
1,020 (1.49%)
A favicon of Ecwid
Ecwid
328 (0.48%)
A favicon of PrestaShop
PrestaShop
237 (0.35%)
A favicon of Shopify
Shopify
206 (0.3%)
A favicon of OpenCart
OpenCart
101 (0.15%)
A favicon of Magento
Magento
76 (0.11%)

Web Analytics

A favicon of Google Analytics
Google Analytics
29,725 (43.45%)
A favicon of Facebook Pixel
Facebook Pixel
3,756 (5.49%)
A favicon of Hotjar
Hotjar
849 (1.24%)
A favicon of Microsoft Clarity
Microsoft Clarity
625 (0.91%)

JavaScript Frameworks

A favicon of MooTools
MooTools
26,192 (38.29%)
A favicon of GSAP
GSAP
4,929 (7.21%)
A favicon of Vue.js
Vue.js
1,486 (2.17%)
A favicon of AngularJS
AngularJS
1,116 (1.63%)
A favicon of RequireJS
RequireJS
1,067 (1.56%)

Joomla Customer Reviews with Pros and Cons

Based on aggregated G2 reviews, Joomla scores highest for extensive customizability (4 mentions) and flexible content management (3 mentions). Users praise the ability to build complex sites without unnecessary bloat. The most common criticism is its confusing interface (3 mentions) and steep learning curve (2 mentions). Capterra data (400+ reviews) reinforces these patterns: 91% positive on versatile website building (185 reviews) and 100% positive on open-source flexibility (39 reviews), while 71% negative on version migration difficulties (31 reviews) and 65% negative on challenging updates (52 reviews) explain the steady migration to simpler platforms.

Generated from real user reviews on G2

Pros
  • Users praise Joomla for its extensive customizability, allowing full control without unnecessary complexity in website management.(4 reviews)
  • Users love Joomla for its flexible content management, offering stability, abundant features, and extensive community support.(3 reviews)
  • Users love the flexibility and customization of Joomla, making it ideal for building complex websites effortlessly.(3 reviews)
  • Users value the all-in-one solutions of Joomla, benefiting from its flexibility and extensive community support for development.(2 reviews)
  • Users value the helpful community support of Joomla, enhancing their experience and promoting collaboration over the years.(2 reviews)
Cons
  • Users find the confusing interface of Joomla hampers usability, making site setup and navigation challenging for newcomers.(3 reviews)
  • Users find the learning curve steep, as exploring features can be confusing and time-consuming for newcomers.(2 reviews)
  • Users note that coding knowledge is required for Joomla, making it challenging for those without technical expertise.(1 reviews)
  • Users find the developer challenges frustrating due to poor documentation and unclear steps for component creation.(1 reviews)
  • Users face challenges with error handling, as issues like error 500 and vague support hinder their Joomla experience.(1 reviews)

Expert Analysis: Joomla Growth Trends & Key Signals for Sales Teams in 2026

Elif Arslan
Elif ArslanCMO & Co-founder, TechnologyChecker

As CMO at TechnologyChecker.io, I've analyzed the Joomla ecosystem across 111,637 active domains matched to 68,405 company profiles (59.07% match rate). Joomla tells a unique story in the CMS market: a two-decade-old platform whose active domain count peaked in December 2024 and is now declining, yet whose institutional core (governments, universities, defense organizations) shows no sign of leaving. Here's what our data reveals.

1. Growth Trajectory: Two Decades of Rise, Then Retreat

Joomla's detection history stretches back to September 2005, when we first tracked 4 active domains. By December 2024 it reached 111,737, but that peak masks a deeper story. Total domains (including historical detections) peaked at 261,000 in late 2017 and have declined to 87,399 by July 2025. The gap between total and active domains has been narrowing, which means Joomla is no longer attracting enough new sites to offset departures. The 543,163 previously-used count means roughly 5 out of every 6 domains that ever ran Joomla have moved on.

Sales Signal: The declining trajectory creates a growing pool of recently migrated organizations, specifically sites that left Joomla in the last 1-3 years. In the last year alone. 2,682 companies moved to WordPress and 294 to Wix. These are organizations in active transition, likely still evaluating their new stack and open to complementary tools.

2. Customer Profile: Institutional, European, Micro-Business

Three characteristics define the typical Joomla customer. First, 85% have 10 or fewer employees, the largest micro-business concentration of any major CMS in our data. Second. They're disproportionately European: Germany leads at 17%, ahead of the US at 13%. The DACH+Benelux region alone accounts for 25%+ of all Joomla companies. Third, the notable companies skew heavily toward the public sector: NATO, the Government of Canada, the United States Courts, Turkey's Ministry of Health, and multiple 10,001+ employee universities.

This duality (85% micro-businesses plus a visible institutional tail) means Joomla serves two distinct audiences with different motivations. The micro-businesses chose it because it was free. The institutions chose it because it's open-source, self-hosted, and compliant with public-sector procurement rules.

Sales Signal: Segment your outreach by company size. For the 85% micro-businesses (1-10 employees), lead with simplicity and migration assistance, as these organizations lack dedicated web teams and are the most receptive to managed alternatives. For the institutional tail (government, education, 200+ employees), lead with data sovereignty, GDPR compliance, and open-source licensing, the reasons they chose Joomla in the first place.

3. Industry & Geographic Concentration

Construction leads at 4.95%, followed by Retail (3.80%), Business Consulting (3.79%), IT Services (3.41%), and Medical Practices (2.56%). No single industry exceeds 5%, which makes Joomla genuinely horizontal, a rarity among CMS platforms. The IT Services concentration (3.41%) is worth noting: many of these are web agencies that built client sites on Joomla and may influence multiple downstream migrations.

Germany's #1 position (11,612 companies, 17%) reflects three factors: the strong German-language Joomla community (Joomla.de), EU open-source mandates, and GDPR-driven preference for self-hosted systems. Italy (8.0%), France (4.9%), Spain (3.7%), and the Netherlands (4.6%) form the rest of the European concentration.

Sales Signal: European-focused SaaS companies should treat Joomla detection as a proxy for "prefers open-source, privacy-conscious, self-hosted solutions." Target Construction (4.95%) and Medical Practices (2.56%) in Germany specifically. These segments combine data sensitivity with real budgets and established Joomla commitments.

4. Migration Patterns: The WordPress Exodus

The numbers are blunt: Joomla lost 42,106 companies to WordPress while gaining only 8,459, a 5:1 loss ratio. This is the dominant migration pattern in our entire dataset. WordPress gains from Joomla outpace any other CMS-to-CMS flow we track. Smaller but growing losses to Wix (net -2,610) and Squarespace (net -1,467) compound the trend.

Interestingly, the Drupal exchange is nearly balanced: 1,028 moved from Drupal to Joomla, 980 went the other way. These two open-source CMS platforms trade users at equilibrium, while both lose to hosted solutions.

Sales Signal: For migration service providers, the 111,637 remaining Joomla domains are the largest addressable migration opportunity in the open-source CMS space. Focus on the 85% micro-businesses who lack development resources. G2 and Capterra reviewers flag "confusing interface" and "painful version upgrades" as top complaints. Lead with "zero-downtime migration" and "automatic updates" messaging.

5. Tech Stack Ecosystem

Joomla's tech stack has a unique fingerprint. 38.29% of Joomla sites still load MooTools, the JavaScript framework bundled with Joomla's core. This makes MooTools detection a reliable secondary signal for identifying Joomla sites. Google Analytics leads at 43.45%, while Facebook Pixel (5.49%) and Hotjar (1.24%) show modest marketing tool adoption, far lower than the 60%+ Facebook Pixel rates we see on Shopify or Privy domains.

E-commerce overlap is minimal: WooCommerce at 1.49%, Ecwid at 0.48%, PrestaShop at 0.35%. Joomla is a content CMS, not a commerce platform. The low marketing and e-commerce tool overlap suggests Joomla's user base is less commercially oriented than other CMS audiences, consistent with the government, education, and nonprofit profile.

Sales Signal: The MooTools detection signal (38.29% overlap) gives you a secondary targeting dimension. Companies running MooTools are almost certainly Joomla users, providing a proxy filter unavailable to competitors who only track CMS detection.

G2 Review Signals

From a marketing perspective, G2 reviews confirm what our migration data already shows. Users praise extensive customizability (4 mentions) as Joomla's top strength, which explains why institutions like NATO and the Government of Canada stick with it. But the top complaint, confusing interface (3 mentions), directly correlates with the 42,106 companies that migrated to WordPress. For sales teams targeting Joomla users, lead with interface simplicity as the wedge.

Key Takeaways

  • Peak and decline. Active domains peaked at 111,737 in December 2024. Total domains peaked at 261,000 in 2017. Five out of six domains that ever used Joomla have moved on.
  • WordPress exodus. 42,106 companies lost to WordPress at a 5:1 ratio, the largest CMS-to-CMS migration in our data.
  • European institutional core. Germany #1 at 17%, heavy government and university presence. These users chose Joomla for compliance, not convenience.
  • Ultra-SMB plus institutions. 85% micro-business, but notable 10,001+ employers like NATO, Fujitsu, and Government of Canada.
  • Capterra confirms the story. 91% positive on flexibility, 71% negative on version upgrades; the operational burden drives migration.

Sales Applications

Outreach template: "We noticed your organization uses Joomla. 71% of Capterra reviewers cite version upgrades as their biggest frustration. Here's how [your solution] eliminates that maintenance burden while preserving the multilingual support and access control your team relies on."

Targeting strategy: Filter for Joomla + Germany + Construction or Medical Practices. This segment combines the highest geographic concentration (17%) with the industries most likely to have data sensitivity requirements and real IT budgets. For migration services, focus on the 85% micro-businesses (1-10 employees), as they lack the development resources to maintain Joomla long-term.

Competitive angle: Use the MooTools co-detection signal (38.29%) as a secondary Joomla identifier. Target sites still on Joomla 4.x or earlier, as they face the exact version migration pain (71% Capterra negative) that makes them receptive to managed alternatives or migration services.

Build your prospect list of companies using Joomla at TechnologyChecker.io to filter by industry, company size, geography, and tech stack overlap across 111,637 tracked domains and 68,405 enriched company profiles.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who uses Joomla?

Joomla is used by 111,637 companies worldwide, including Government of Canada, Fujitsu, Junta de Andalucía, based on our analysis of 50M+ crawled domains at TechnologyChecker.io. It's particularly popular in the Construction industry (4.95% of customers).

How many customers does Joomla have?

Joomla has 111,637 active customers detected through our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains. We enriched 68,405 of these with LinkedIn company data on TechnologyChecker.io to generate detailed insights. An additional 543,163 sites that previously used Joomla are also tracked.

What is Joomla's market share?

Joomla holds 3.15% of the CMS market, ranking #8 in the category — based on our analysis of 50M+ domains and 40K+ technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.

What are the best alternatives to Joomla?

The top alternatives to Joomla include Squarespace (18.42% market share), Wix (17.87% market share), Duda (3.73% market share), Weebly (2.58% market share) — based on our market share data across 50M+ crawled domains.

Which countries use Joomla the most?

Germany leads with 11,612 Joomla customers, followed by United States (8,894), Italy (5,475), France (3,324), United Kingdom (3,231), based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.

What size companies use Joomla?

The most common company size is 1-10 employees, representing 85% of Joomla customers, based on our analysis of 68,405 enriched companies. This is followed by 11-50 employees (8.8%) and 51-200 employees (3.7%).

How old are companies that use Joomla?

The majority of Joomla customers were founded in the 2010s (33.32%), followed by the 2000s (26.32%), based on our analysis of 68,405 enriched companies. This suggests Joomla is most popular among relatively young companies.

What is the ideal customer profile for Joomla?

The ideal Joomla customer is: Company Size: 1-10 employees, Location: Germany, US, or Italy, City: Berlin, Rome, Paris, Amsterdam, Founded: 2000-2019, Company Age: ~5-25 years old — based on our analysis of 68,405 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.

Does anyone still use Joomla?

Yes, our TechnologyChecker.io data tracks 111,637 active domains currently running Joomla, including sites for NATO, the Government of Canada, Fujitsu, and dozens of major universities. Active domains peaked at 111,737 in December 2024 and have since declined slightly. New adoption has slowed, but a loyal institutional base of governments, universities, and nonprofits continues to rely on it.

Is Joomla free to use?

Yes, joomla is 100% free and open-source, released under the GNU General Public License. There are no paid tiers, no per-seat licensing, and no feature gates. You do need web hosting (starting around $3-10/month) and a domain name. The self-hosted model is a key reason governments and universities prefer Joomla over SaaS alternatives like Squarespace or Wix.

Is Joomla still actively maintained?

Yes, joomla 6.0 was released in July 2025, and the latest version is Joomla 6.0.3 (February 2026). Joomla 5.x continues to receive security and bug-fix updates as a long-term support branch through October 2027. The project maintains a regular release schedule managed by its open-source community of volunteer developers.

Which is better, Joomla or WordPress?

It depends on your needs. Joomla has stronger built-in access control, native multilingual support, and more flexible content types, which is why governments and universities favor it. WordPress has a far larger plugin ecosystem and simpler learning curve. Our migration data shows 42,106 companies switched from Joomla to WordPress, while only 8,459 went the other way, suggesting WordPress wins on ease of use for most organizations.

What are the disadvantages of Joomla?

G2 and Capterra reviewers cite three main weaknesses: a confusing admin interface (3 G2 mentions), a steep learning curve (2 mentions), and painful version upgrades (71% negative on Capterra). The update process is manual and can break extensions. Our TechnologyChecker.io migration data confirms the impact: Joomla lost 42,106 companies to WordPress, largely because simpler CMS platforms reduce operational overhead.

Is Drupal better than Joomla?

Drupal is better for large-scale, developer-heavy projects with complex content architectures, such as major media sites and enterprise intranets. Joomla sits between WordPress (simplest) and Drupal (most flexible) in complexity. Our data shows Joomla holds 3.15% CMS market share versus Drupal's 2.57%, and the two platforms exchange companies nearly equally (1,028 moved from Drupal to Joomla, 980 went the other way).

Is Joomla a headless CMS?

Not natively, but Joomla 4.x and later include a built-in Web Services API that enables headless or decoupled usage. You can serve Joomla content as JSON to any frontend framework (React, Vue, etc.) while still using Joomla's admin panel for content management. This hybrid approach appeals to organizations that want API access without abandoning Joomla's traditional rendering.

Why is Germany the top country for Joomla?

Germany leads Joomla adoption at 17% of all enriched companies in our TechnologyChecker.io data, ahead of the US at 13%. Three factors drive this: a strong German-language Joomla community (Joomla.de), European public-sector mandates favoring open-source software, and GDPR-driven preference for self-hosted CMS platforms that keep data on European servers.

Can Joomla be used for e-commerce?

Yes, through extensions like VirtueMart, HikaShop, and J2Store. However, e-commerce isn't Joomla's strength. Our data shows only 1.49% of Joomla sites also use WooCommerce, and Shopify overlap is just 0.30%. Joomla's primary use case is content publishing, institutional sites, and community portals rather than online stores.

How can you tell if a website uses Joomla?

Several signals give it away: the /administrator login path, Joomla-specific meta generator tags, MooTools JavaScript library (38.29% of Joomla sites in our data still load it), and the /components/ or /modules/ URL structure. TechnologyChecker.io detects Joomla using multiple methods including script analysis, HTTP headers, and HTML pattern matching across 50M+ crawled domains.

Is Joomla good for government websites?

Yes, and our data confirms it. Government agencies are among Joomla's most prominent users, including NATO, the Government of Canada, the United States Courts, Turkey's Ministry of Health, and the Junta de Andalucía (Spain). Joomla's fine-grained access control, multilingual support, open-source licensing, and self-hosting capability make it well-suited for public-sector compliance requirements.

What industries use Joomla the most?

Construction leads at 4.95% of Joomla's enriched customer base, followed by Retail (3.80%), Business Consulting (3.79%), IT Services (3.41%), and Medical Practices (2.56%). No single industry exceeds 5%, which makes Joomla a genuinely horizontal CMS, unlike Shopify (retail-dominated) or HubSpot (marketing-heavy). This data comes from our analysis of 68,405 enriched companies on TechnologyChecker.io.

What happened to Joomla's market share?

Joomla was once the second-largest CMS after WordPress. Our TechnologyChecker.io data now places it at #8 with 3.15% market share, overtaken by hosted builders like Squarespace (18.42%), Wix (17.87%), and Duda (3.73%). Total domains peaked at 261,000 in late 2017 and have declined steadily since. The shift reflects a broader market move toward no-code, fully hosted website platforms.

Joomla Overview
Category
CMS
Customers
111,637
Companies Analyzed
68,405
Market Share
3.15%
Category Rank
#8
Top Country
Germany
Top Industry
Construction
Joomla Customer ICP

Based on 68,405 company data

Company Size
1-10 employees
Location
Germany, US, or Italy
City
Berlin, Rome, Paris, Amsterdam
Founded
2000-2019
Company Age
~5-25 years old
About Our Data

These insights include all TechnologCchecker.io detections of Joomla (free & paid plans).

Total Detections2.08B
Detection History+20 Years
Domains Crawled29.6M
Technologies44K+
Company Match Rate31.6%