Companies Using Material-UI

We detect Material-UI on 121,420 domains, including Samsung, Abbott, Orange Group. A detection means the technology is present on that domain, which for large organisations is often a single storefront or subdomain rather than a company-wide deployment. Among domains we matched to a company with a resolved industry, the most common is Software Development (8.41%).

We detect 121,420 domains running Material-UI across our monthly crawl of live business domains. Company data could be matched for 69,289 of them (57.1%), and every company-size, industry and country breakdown on this page describes that matched subset rather than the full detected base. A further 16,686 domains carried a Material-UI detection previously and no longer do.

Material-UI holds 1% of the UI & CSS Frameworks category, ranking #10. This is a share of the domains we detect running a platform in this category — not a share of all websites, and not a share of spending — so it is not directly comparable to figures published on other denominators.

The top alternatives to Material-UI include Bootstrap (46.55% market share), Tailwind CSS (22.94% market share), Animate.css (8.41% market share), Element UI (5.48% market share) — measured as a share of the domains we detect running a platform in this category.

United States leads with 26,061 matched Material-UI domains, followed by India (4,545), United Kingdom (3,880), Brazil (2,957), Canada (2,666). These are counts within the 69,289 domains we could match to a company record, not the full detected base.

The most common company size is 1-10 employees, representing 53.72% of the Material-UI domains we could match to a company record and size — a subset of 69,289 matched companies, not of all 121,420 detected domains. This is followed by 11-50 employees (26.22%) and 51-200 employees (10.65%).

Among the Material-UI domains we could match to a company with a known founding date, most were founded in the 2020s (33.35%), followed by the 2010s (36.03%). That matched subset is drawn from 69,289 companies and is not representative of all 121,420 detected domains. This suggests Material-UI is most popular among relatively young companies.

The ideal Material-UI customer is: Company Size: 1-10 employees, Location: US, India, or UK, Founded: 2010-2020s, Industry: Software, Tech, IT Services, Tech Stack: React-based applications — based on our analysis of 69,289 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.

Notable companies using Material-UI include Accenture, Deloitte, PwC, Samsung, Shell, DHL, Ford, ICICI Bank, Allianz and General Electric, typically for internal tools and admin interfaces. Our August 2026 crawl detects Material UI on 121,420 active domains, of which 69,289 match a company record.

Yes. Our August 2026 crawl detects it on 121,420 active domains, making it one of the largest React component libraries we track. It ranks #10 of 85 in the UI & CSS Frameworks category at 1.0% share, though that ranking compares it against framework-agnostic CSS libraries like Bootstrap and Tailwind CSS that any page can use. Among React-specific component systems, its position is considerably stronger.

Material-UI's core components are completely free and open-source under the MIT license. MUI offers paid premium plans (MUI X Pro and Premium) for advanced data grid features, date pickers, and technical support. Most companies use the free tier successfully for production applications.

Material-UI is used for building modern React web applications with Google's Material Design system. Companies deploy it for internal dashboards, customer portals, admin tools, and public-facing websites. The library provides prebuilt, accessible components that accelerate development without requiring custom design system work.

Yes, our data shows a substantial share of Material-UI customers also use Next.js for server-side rendering and static site generation. Material-UI provides official Next.js integration guides and supports both server-side rendering and client-side rendering patterns, making it a popular choice for performance-improved React applications.

They solve different problems and are frequently used together. Material UI supplies ready-made React components; Tailwind supplies utility classes for spacing and layout. Our data reflects that: among domains that dropped Material UI, 28.35% run Tailwind, against 20.96% of those that kept it, a difference far too small to indicate replacement, and 86% of the overlapping domains still run both. Choose Material UI for delivery speed with opinionated defaults, Tailwind for full visual control.

Material-UI implements Google's Material Design system but is not developed by Google. It's an independent open-source React component library maintained by MUI (formerly Material-UI team). Google created Material Design as a design language; Material-UI translates those principles into React components anyone can use.

We do not publish a switching table for Material UI, because no corridor survives our base-rate test. A corridor only counts if companies leaving Material UI adopt a competitor at a higher rate than companies that stayed. Tailwind CSS comes closest at a 1.4x lift, but 86% of those domains still run both products, which indicates complementary use rather than migration. Reporting it as churn would describe a competition developers do not actually experience.

Yes, material-UI has full TypeScript support with thorough type definitions included in the package. The library is written in TypeScript, providing excellent autocomplete and type safety for React developers. Over 95% of Material-UI users also use React, many in TypeScript projects.

Yes, extensively. Material UI ships a theming system that lets you override design tokens (palette, typography, spacing, shape) globally, plus per-component style overrides and a sx prop for one-off adjustments. Under the hood it uses a CSS-in-JS engine, Emotion by default since v5, with JSS in older installations; our detection still finds JSS on 31.72% of Material UI domains, reflecting how many v4-era applications remain in production.

MUI X Premium is Material-UI's paid tier offering advanced data grid features like row grouping, Excel export, and aggregation functions. It also includes premium date/time pickers and charts. Pricing starts under $100 annually per developer. The core Material-UI components remain free for all users.

Yes, and the detection data supports it. Companies with 10,001+ employees make up 0.69% of matched Material UI domains, a small percentage but 458 domains in absolute terms, and named adopters include Accenture, Deloitte, PwC, Samsung, Shell, DHL, Ford, ICICI Bank, Allianz and General Electric. These deployments are concentrated in internal tools and admin consoles, where a comprehensive component set matters more than visual differentiation.

Yes, material-UI offers an official Figma design kit with representations of React components. This allows designers and developers to collaborate more efficiently by sharing a common component language. The Figma kit includes all core Material-UI components with customizable theme variables matching the React implementation.