Companies Using accessiBe

I've spent more than ten years building technographic systems, and accessiBe is the clearest case I've seen of a raw count telling the wrong story. A domain counts here when a page loads accessiBe's accessWidget script from acsbapp.com or one of its sister addresses. Our October 2026 crawl found that on 116,927 live domains. After we removed domain-for-sale pages, 84,096 remain, and we matched 54,808 of them to a company, a 65.17% match rate. On that cleaned count accessiBe is 2nd of the 47 tools we track in Accessibility Tools, with 18.44%.

More than a quarter of the raw count was parked domains

32,831 of the 116,927 raw domains carried a for-sale or gambling title, and 32,817 of those were listings on Atom, a domain marketplace whose for-sale pages wire their footer "Accessibility" link to accessiBe. Every parked domain listed there looks like an accessiBe site to a crawler. That matters if you read an earlier version of this page, which called accessiBe the fastest grower in its category over the summer. Of the domains still live that we first saw in July or August 2026, 20,504 of 37,790 are for-sale pages. The growth was mostly parked domains, and we've withdrawn it.

The cleanup isn't perfect. About 14,800 live domains had no title we could read, and 5,586 of them run Intercom and New Relic together, the pair Atom's pages carry. When we checked 40 of those, 33 redirected to Atom. So a few thousand for-sale pages are probably still inside the 84,096, and I'd treat the true figure as somewhat lower. Counts move for ordinary reasons too: the set of domains we crawl turns over every month, and our detection widens over time.

"Take out one marketplace's parked domains and accessiBe's summer growth mostly disappears. What's left is still the second-biggest footprint in the category, built by small businesses that chose the widget themselves." - Mehmet Suleyman, Founder at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales Signal: if you buy or build a list of accessiBe sites, filter out for-sale titles and Atom redirects first. On a raw list, more than one row in four is a parked domain with nobody behind it.

Who the customers are

The buyer is small. 43.88% of matched companies with a known size have 1 to 10 employees and 29.59% have 11 to 50, so 73.47% have 50 or fewer. They aren't young, though. 44.55% were founded before 2000 and only 8.82% in the 2020s. Age matters here more than size: these owners have had the same site for a long time.

The enterprise tail is 1,682 companies above 1,000 staff, and their installs are usually one property. Cummins runs accessiBe on its parts shop, Sysco on a restaurant-trends site, Little Caesars on its franchise site, EY on its German careers site and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings on its investor site. GE Aerospace, Munich Re, Kohler and Waffle House run it on their main domains.

Sales Signal: at large accounts, find the team that owns the specific site, whether that's careers, investor relations or the online shop. At small ones the owner is the buyer, and they've already shown they'll pay for an accessibility product.

Industry and geography

43,624 of the 54,808 matched companies are American, about 80%. Italy is a surprising second with 2,569, more than the United Kingdom (1,243) and Germany (480) combined, and Canada follows with 2,069. By industry nothing dominates. Retail leads at 5.29% and Real Estate has 4.93%, while the two healthcare rows, Hospitals and Health Care plus Medical Practices, add up to 8.02%. Motor Vehicle Manufacturing (2.39%) is the odd one. The stack explains it: DealerOn, a website platform for car dealers, runs on 2.75% of accessiBe domains.

Sales Signal: the densest pockets are US real estate offices, medical practices and car dealers, all businesses whose customers find them through a public website. Italy deserves its own look, since 2,569 companies there already pay for an accessibility widget.

UserWay, AudioEye and the overlap

UserWay is the largest tool in the category at 167,603 domains, about twice accessiBe's footprint, and AudioEye has 68,955. On the sites themselves they mostly don't meet. 568 domains run accessiBe and UserWay together today and 254 run accessiBe and AudioEye. Since we began tracking in March, 228 domains that dropped accessiBe now run UserWay and 159 went the other way; with AudioEye the split is 110 and 151. Small flows in both directions are coexistence, so we don't chart them as switches. EqualWeb trades about 15 domains each way with accessiBe.

"Most sites that drop accessiBe don't turn up on UserWay or AudioEye. The vendor-to-vendor traffic is a few hundred domains in each direction." - Mehmet Suleyman, Founder at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales Signal: on this evidence, displacement deals against accessiBe are rare, so a rival widget has little to gain from a "switch from accessiBe" campaign. The 568 sites running two widgets are the exception worth a call, because someone there is running two products that do the same job.

The stack around it

Google Analytics runs on 84.05% of accessiBe domains and Cloudflare on 56.71%. WordPress is on 41.0%, Elementor on 10.78% and Divi on 4.64%, and accessiBe's pricing page lists a WordPress extension and Google Tag Manager among its install routes. reCAPTCHA appears on 20.78%. These percentages are of the 84,092 clean live domains in our stack sample. Intercom shows 10.26%, but that row is inflated by the leftover for-sale pages, so I'd ignore it. Which of these signals a crawler can see is covered in our writeup on technology detection methods.

Sales Signal: a WordPress plugin or a script deployable through Google Tag Manager reaches about four in ten of these sites without a developer. Agencies building WordPress sites for US small businesses are the natural channel.

Reviews, price and the FTC record

accessiBe's pricing page charges for accessWidget by traffic: $490 a year on Micro for up to 5,000 monthly visits, $1,490 on Growth and $3,990 on Scale, with Enterprise quoted (checked 10 October 2026). On G2, ease of use leads the praise with 341 mentions, and high cost is the top complaint with 123, followed by a lack of clarity about the product (54) and pricing for low-traffic sites (47). Another 32 mentions say manual fixes are still needed on customised sites.

The public record sits beside that. The FTC approved a final order on 22 April 2025 requiring accessiBe to pay $1 million. Its January 2025 complaint alleged that accessiBe misrepresented its AI tool's ability to make websites WCAG-compliant and presented articles and reviews it was connected to as independent. Our crawl can't say whether any site is compliant. It can say that 84,096 domains run the widget today.

Sales Signal: for audit and remediation firms, an accessiBe site is a qualified lead, because the owner already has a budget line for accessibility. Lead with what your work changes in the site's own code. The owner chose the widget, and attacking it is a poor way to open.

Key takeaways

• Second in its category. 84,096 cleaned domains and 18.44%, behind UserWay's 167,603.
• The raw count overstates. 32,831 parked domains removed; the API's 115,497 still includes them.
• Small, older, American buyers. 73.47% have 50 or fewer staff, 44.55% were founded before 2000, and about 80% are in the US.
• No switching story. A few hundred domains move each way between accessiBe, UserWay and AudioEye.
• In practice, a WordPress product. 41.0% of its domains run WordPress.

Sales applications

For outreach, start from what the prospect already runs: "Your site loads accessiBe's widget on WordPress. Here is what an audit of the templates underneath would change." For targeting, filter our accessiBe list to the United States, 1 to 50 employees and real estate, medical practices or retail, then drop for-sale titles. For a competitive angle, start with the 568 domains running accessiBe and UserWay together, since they're already weighing two products.

The numbers on this page come from our own crawl and company matching, refreshed monthly. Browse the full accessiBe list at TechnologyChecker.io.