Companies Using accessiBe

I've spent more than ten years building technographic systems, and accessibility tools are the strangest category we track. This analysis draws on our live crawl of August 2026, which found accessiBe on 102,667 active domains and matched 58,449 to enriched company records, a 56.9% enrichment rate, plus churn watched directly since 16 March 2026. Two facts sit at the centre of this page. accessiBe is growing faster than any other vendor here, and it paid $1 million in April 2025 to settle FTC allegations about what its product could deliver.

Growth trajectory

accessiBe enters our long-run detection history in November 2018 on a single domain, reaching 684 by January 2020, 5,203 by January 2022 and 13,315 by January 2024. Then the measurement changes. That feed ends in July 2025 and our crawler starts in June 2026, so the step from 14,172 to 59,711 across the gap is coverage widening, not a customer surge.

What matters is the stretch measured by one system. Inside our own crawl accessiBe went 59,711 in June 2026 to 92,576 in July to 102,667 in August, a 1.72x rise, while the crawl as a whole grew 1.18x, from 321.0M to 380.0M active detections. Normalise one against the other and accessiBe is up about 1.46x in real terms. UserWay managed 1.09x, below the baseline, so it lost relative share while staying the largest vendor by volume.

"accessiBe is the only vendor in this category that outgrew our own crawler. Everyone else moved with the coverage. That's a real commercial result, recorded in the period after the FTC order, which is the part people find hard to hold in one hand." - Mehmet Suleyman, Founder at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales Signal: If you sell remediation or auditing, accessiBe's install base is the fastest-growing pool of accessibility-aware buyers on the web. They've already spent money on this problem.

Customer profile

The base is small. 46.24% of enriched accessiBe customers have ten or fewer employees and 28.47% fall in the 11 to 50 band, so about three quarters sit under 50 staff. Only 0.28% are 10,001+ organisations, though that tail carries Cummins, Sysco and the City of New York. On founding dates, 41.13% were founded in the 2010s and 24.64% in the 2000s, with just 12.57% from the 2020s. These aren't new companies getting online. They're established operators who added a widget to a site that already existed.

Sales Signal: Filter our detection list to 1 to 50 employees and a pre-2020 founding date and you have three quarters of the base. Price for that buyer, not the enterprise logos.

Industry and geographic concentration

The United States accounts for 78.47% of enriched companies with a country on file, 43,676 of them, heavier than almost any category we track. The reason is legal: 3,117 federal website accessibility lawsuits were filed in the US in 2025. Italy is second at 4.37% and Canada third at 3.94%.

By vertical, and reading these as shares of the top ten industries we chart, Retail leads at 14.74%, Real Estate follows at 14.21% and Advertising Services at 11.58%. Put Hospitals and Health Care (11.38%) beside Medical Practices (10.24%) and healthcare outweighs either leader. Advertising is the row I'd look at twice. Agencies rarely buy for themselves; they install the widget across client sites, so one contract produces dozens of detections.

Sales Signal: The agency row is a channel, not a segment: sign one accessiBe-using agency and you reach its client book. Otherwise, US retail and real estate under 50 staff is where the volume sits.

Migration patterns

This is the finding that reframes the category. Since 16 March 2026, 6,447 domains have dropped accessiBe, 5.9% of the 108,615 we have ever detected it on. Only 223, or 3.5%, installed another accessibility tool. The other 96.5% removed the widget and put nothing in its place.

Vendor-to-vendor flows are rounding errors next to that. accessiBe gained 92 domains from UserWay, 83 from AudioEye and 10 from Pojo.me, and lost 105 back to UserWay, 55 to AudioEye and 23 to Texthelp. That is 202 in against 209 out on a base of 102,667. The competitive fight everyone writes about involves 411 domains. The abandonment involves 6,447.

"Every vendor in this category loses far more domains to nothing than to each other. Between 0.7% and 3.5% of churn goes to a rival. Sites aren't switching overlays, they're deciding they don't want one." - Mehmet Suleyman, Founder at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales Signal: Churned accessiBe domains are the best prospect list in accessibility right now. They bought once, they left, and 96.5% bought nothing else, so the problem is still unsolved.

Technology ecosystem

87.98% of accessiBe domains also run Google Analytics and 31.1% run Cloudflare Browser Insights. WordPress covers 30.58% and Squarespace 1.97%, while Shopify reaches 8.78% and WooCommerce 2.99%.

The consent row is the one I'd point at. OneTrust appears on 5.73%, CookieYes on 3.78%, iubenda on 3.32% and Cookie Control on 1.68%, so roughly one accessiBe site in seven also runs a cookie banner. Same purchase reflex twice: a legal obligation answered with a drop-in script. Which of these signals a crawler can actually see is covered in our writeup on technology detection methods.

Sales Signal: WordPress plus Google Analytics plus a consent widget describes a third of this base. If your product ships as a WordPress plugin, distribution is solved. Most of these sites have no developer.

Where the reviews and our crawl disagree

G2's five pro themes carry 1,109 mentions between them against 287 for the five cons. Cost is the loudest complaint at 123, with another 47 on pricing limits, set against 341 for ease of use. Read that as a price objection and you'd expect departing customers to land somewhere cheaper. They don't. Of the 6,447 domains that dropped accessiBe since 16 March 2026, 96.5% installed no replacement.

The two datasets measure different moments. G2 records the buyer near the purchase; our crawl records the site months later, and it has no row for the customer who deleted the script. On G2, 156 mentions credit accessiBe with effective ADA compliance, describing sites as legally safe. The FTC filed its complaint in January 2025 and issued a final order in April 2025, with a $1 million payment, over allegations accessiBe misrepresented its AI overlay's ability to deliver WCAG compliance. Reviewers carry their own qualification: 32 mentions record manual fixes still needed on customised sites.

Sales Signal: Buyers here are getting better at reading the gap between what a widget claims and what a court accepts. Lead with what your product does not claim.

Key takeaways

• The only real grower here. 1.72x against a 1.18x crawl baseline, June to August 2026, about 1.46x once normalised.
• The FTC record belongs in the picture. Complaint January 2025, final order April 2025, $1 million paid over WCAG compliance claims.
• Churn goes nowhere. 6,447 domains dropped it since March 2026 and 96.5% installed no replacement.
• The buyer is a small, established US business. 46.24% under ten staff, 78.47% US, 41.13% founded in the 2010s.
• Vendor switching is a footnote. Around 400 domains moved either way between accessiBe and its rivals.

Sales applications

The outreach angle is the churn list: domains that dropped accessiBe and installed nothing have no incumbent to displace and a budget that already existed. The targeting filter is 1 to 50 employees, United States, founded before 2020, in retail or real estate. Against UserWay you are arguing about scale and ownership; against accessiBe, about the distance between an automated fix and an audited one.

All of this comes from first-party detection data, not vendor claims. Browse the full accessiBe detection set at TechnologyChecker.io, where the numbers refresh with every monthly crawl.