Companies Using AudioEye

I have spent more than ten years building crawlers and technographic systems. Web accessibility is where the distance between what a vendor sells and what our data shows is widest. This analysis draws on our August 2026 crawl, which found AudioEye on 65,177 active domains and matched 45,933 of them to enriched company records, a 70.5% enrichment rate, plus the domain-level churn our crawler has watched since 16 March 2026.

Growth trajectory

AudioEye first appears in our long-run detection history in December 2013 on one domain. It reached 148 by January 2018, 6,291 by January 2021 and 23,298 by January 2024. That chart needs a warning label. The series splices our long-run detection history, which ends July 2025, with our own crawler, which begins June 2026, so the step across the gap is coverage widening, not customers arriving. The 2024 to 2025 dip is the same artifact in reverse, because the older feed shrank its tracked universe before it degraded. The part we measured ourselves: 57,070 domains in June 2026, 64,454 in July, 65,177 in August. That is 1.14x, against 1.18x for our whole crawl over the same months.

"AudioEye grew 1.14x while the corpus around it grew 1.18x. That is a vendor keeping pace with the web rather than outrunning it, and in a category where accessiBe posted 1.72x, holding position is still a result." - Mehmet Suleyman, Founder at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales Signal: A flat relative trend means the installed base is stable and reachable rather than turning over fast. A prospect list built from these 65,177 domains stays accurate for months.

Customer profile

The buyer is small. 57.38% of enriched AudioEye companies have ten employees or fewer and another 29.02% sit in the 11 to 50 band, so 86.4% of the base is under fifty people. They aren't young companies. Only 6.28% were founded in the 2020s, while 29.54% date to the 2000s and 18.81% to the 1990s. That's an established local operator who bought a website recently, not a startup that shipped one. The enterprise tail looks nothing like it. Sorted by headcount, our largest detections are Samsung, LG, Weatherford, then US hospital systems and school districts: RWJBH Medical Group, Hackensack Meridian Health, Clark County School District, Houston ISD. A district buys under procurement rules. A two-person contractor buys after a demand letter lands.

Sales Signal: Segment before writing a single email. The sub-50-employee majority buys on price and legal fear. The districts and hospital networks buy on procurement language and audit evidence, and they won't read the same pitch.

Industry and geographic concentration

Of the ten industries we chart, Retail is the largest vertical at 16.47%, with Construction at 15.98%, Individual and Family Services at 14.82% and Real Estate at 12.59% behind it. Those shares are of the top ten, not of the whole base, so treat them as a ranking. The common thread is businesses that sell locally through a website. Geography is where AudioEye separates itself. 95.84% of its enriched companies with a country on file are in the United States, with Canada at 2.05%, Italy 0.75%, the United Kingdom 0.43% and Germany 0.08%. Nothing else in this category is that locked to one market. The reason is regulatory: 3,117 federal website accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2025, and AudioEye sells directly against that risk.

Sales Signal: If you sell accessibility outside North America, AudioEye's base isn't your competition. Inside it, that 0.43% UK share and 0.08% German share show where their local guidance is thin.

Migration patterns

This is the finding that reframes the category. 5,496 domains have dropped AudioEye since 16 March 2026, 7.8% of the 70,594 domains we have ever seen it on. Only 189 of them, 3.4%, showed up running another accessibility tool. The rest removed the widget and put nothing in its place. Vendor traffic is small in both directions: 97 domains went to UserWay and 83 to accessiBe, while 53 arrived from UserWay and 55 from accessiBe. That's a rounding error against 5,496. Any buying guide framing this as a contest between overlay vendors has the wrong question.

"Fewer than four in every hundred sites that dropped AudioEye replaced it with a rival. That isn't a competitive loss, it's a product class being reconsidered. The churn goes to nothing." - Mehmet Suleyman, Founder at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales Signal: Those 5,496 abandoned domains are a better list than the 189 switchers. They already budgeted for accessibility once and walked away, so the opening line is what went wrong, not why they need it.

Technology ecosystem

Look at what runs alongside AudioEye and the go-to-market becomes obvious. Duda appears on 44.99% of AudioEye domains, against 13.08% for WordPress. Snowplow Analytics sits at 45.87% and Adobe Analytics at 35.97%, both far above what a base that is 86.4% small business would normally carry. All three point the same way: much of this footprint arrives bundled through a website-builder channel rather than through a direct sale. Google Analytics at 74.19% is the only ordinary signal in the stack. Consent tooling is thin, OneTrust at 4.33%, and ecommerce barely registers at 1.14% for Shopify. It's a distribution business as much as a software one, and that explains the country concentration.

Sales Signal: Filter the base by Duda and you have isolated the OEM half of it. Those accounts didn't choose AudioEye, they inherited it, and they're the softest targets on the list.

What the reviews say against what we measured

Start with the volume. G2's top positive theme for AudioEye carries 33 mentions and its top complaint 6. accessiBe's run 341 and 123 on 102,667 domains against AudioEye's 65,177: two thirds of the footprint on a tenth of the reviews. Duda sits on 44.99% of these domains, and nobody reviews a widget that came bundled with their website builder.

Compliance draws the most praise, 63 mentions across two G2 themes. Our crawl counted 5,496 removals, and 96.6% of them installed nothing after. Both are correct. G2 captures the weeks after purchase, when the widget installed and the report landed. A removal is that account's verdict a year on, and nobody goes back to update a rating.

The complaints are few but aimed where the churn goes: 6 mentions that users can't tell which issues AudioEye found or how to fix them, 3 that fixes need AudioEye's involvement rather than happening automatically. Support isn't the weak spot: 28 mentions praise it, 4 don't. And no star rating outweighs accessiBe's $1M FTC settlement over its overlay claims, final order April 2025.

Sales Signal: 33 mentions is thin proof for 65,177 domains. The builder-channel accounts were never asked. Ask them.

Key takeaways

• 65,177 active domains, 15.14% share, rank #3 of 32, from 45,933 enriched companies.
• 1.14x growth against a 1.18x corpus baseline is flat in real terms.
• 95.84% United States. This is a product sold into an American legal market.
• 5,496 domains dropped it and only 3.4% moved to a rival. Abandoned, not switched.
• Duda on 44.99% of domains is the tell for a builder channel doing much of the selling.

Sales applications

The outreach angle comes from the churn: approach the removals, not the switchers, and ask what the widget failed to fix. The targeting filter is Duda plus AudioEye, which isolates accounts that inherited the product and are least attached to it. The competitive angle is evidence: the FTC order against a rival and the courts' treatment of overlays give you a factual opening without naming anyone.

Every figure here comes from our monthly crawl of 29.9M active domains and the LinkedIn-matched records behind it. For how we identify a widget like this, see technology detection methods. The full company list and migration data stay live on TechnologyChecker.io.