Companies Using Termly

I started on Termly expecting a big number to shrink a little. It shrank by two thirds. Our September 2026 crawl finds Termly's script on 123,888 live domains, and 81,585 of them are domains for sale. The other 42,303, 29,594 of them matched to a company, are the base for everything below, and about half of those got Termly from a website builder.

Two thirds of the raw count is for sale

Atom, a domain marketplace, puts a Termly consent banner on its for-sale landing pages, all under one Termly account. 65,850 domains carry the title "Premium Domain For Sale | Atom", about 12,000 untitled ones run Atom's chat and monitoring scripts and redirect to atom.com, and smaller marketplaces add a few thousand more. None of them is a business choosing a consent tool. We removed all 81,585 and put back the 34 real sites the filter had caught.

Sales signal: a Termly list built from a raw script count is mostly parked domains. Short brandable .com names with no company behind them are the giveaway.

One reading, not a trend line

The usage chart has one point. Until 4 August 2026 our detection recognised only Termly's older embed script, which found about 2,700 domains in July; the current banner loads from a different address, and we started counting it in August. So 94.03% of today's clean domains were first seen in August or September, a figure that measures our detection rather than Termly's sales. The domains we crawl also turn over every month, dead sites out and newly found ones in. Exits we can count: 1,864 domains dropped Termly since we began tracking it in March 2026.

"Two in three domains carrying Termly's script were for sale, and half the rest got Termly from their website builder. Far fewer businesses chose Termly than a raw count suggests." - Emma Davies, Data Analyst at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales signal: an August jump is no basis for a growth pitch. Treat the base as about 42,000 sites, half of them run through a builder.

The builder channel

This is the finding I'd put first in a briefing. Duda runs on 21.23% of Termly's clean domains, One.com hosts 16.14%, Mono.net builds 7.45% and IONOS MyWebsite 3.33%, about 48% in all. Duda, One.com and IONOS offer Termly from their own dashboards, and Mono.net sites carry it the same way. One.com is the closest tie. group.one bought Termly in January 2024, One.com is a group.one brand, and one.com customers switch Termly on and pay for it through one.com. Every builder site still gets its own Termly ID and a working banner, so the installs are real. But the owner of a small Duda site picked Duda, and Duda picked the consent tool.

Sales signal: on a builder site the consent decision usually sits with the builder or the agency. For Termly's rivals the builders are the accounts worth winning, since one decision there moves thousands of sites.

Who the customers are

Across all matched companies the base is small, with a long tail of large organisations: 62.53% have 1 to 10 employees and 308 have more than 1,000. PACCAR, Celestica and TrueBlue run Termly on their main domains, while the Post Office uses it on its parcel-ordering site and the University of Texas on its extended-campus site. Universities (Bristol, Queen Mary, Lincoln, Oklahoma's online programmes) and US health systems such as Main Line Health and Hoag form visible clusters. Geography is the other surprise. The US has the most matched companies, 10,129, but the European countries in our top 15 hold 15,986 between them, probably because One.com and Mono.net are European.

Sales signal: two segments, two routes. European small businesses on One.com, Duda and Mono.net are reached through the platforms; universities, hospitals and mid-size US firms installed Termly themselves and are sold one account at a time.

Switching: two small flows and one platform decision

Since March 2026, 97 domains dropped CookieYes and kept Termly, and 62 did the same with Complianz. I trust the Complianz flow more. Of 121 domains we've seen running both, 62 left Complianz for Termly where Complianz's usual drop rate predicts about 8, and 17 went the other way. CookieYes runs at about twice its base rate, 97 against roughly 46 expected, with 83 of 210 sites still on both; it clears our tests by a hair. In a browser, 18 of 19 CookieYes movers and 14 of 15 Complianz movers now show only Termly, under 26 different Termly IDs, so these are separate owners, mostly on WordPress.

A bigger number sits outside the table. About 3,300 domains lost Cookiebot and kept Termly, and 2,965 of the 3,148 we listed are Duda sites: Duda changed the consent banner it provides. The 1,774 Termly sites still carrying Cookiebot are mostly Duda sites partway through that change.

"The biggest 'switch' to Termly in our data isn't a switch. Duda changed the consent banner it provides, and about three thousand sites moved with it." - Emma Davies, Data Analyst at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales signal: the CookieYes and Complianz movers are small WordPress sites that wanted policies and a banner in one tool. For Termly's competitors, keeping a builder partnership is worth more than any number of single win-backs.

The stack around it

WordPress runs on only 20.71% of Termly domains, far below CookieYes or Complianz. Google Analytics is on 61.18%. Snowplow shows up on 25.31%, mostly because the builders bring it (it's Duda's built-in analytics). Few sites sell online: WooCommerce 2.94%, Shopify 1.78%. Bigger organisations weighing a full privacy platform are a different population; 2,543 of the companies that use OneTrust employ more than 10,000 people, per its profile.

Sales signal: a Termly site is likelier to be a builder site with Google Analytics than a WordPress install, which matters for anything sold as a plugin.

What Termly says, and what we see

Termly's pricing page claims more than 2 million businesses and 1.7 billion banner views a month (read 29 September 2026); we find 42,303 live domains. Both can be true. Termly's figure is businesses, probably including many that generated a policy and pasted it into a site as HTML, which our script-based count doesn't see; we count running banners. The prices fit a small-site base: Free at $0 for one policy and a banner up to 10,000 views a month, Starter at $10 a month billed annually, Pro+ at $15. A company that needs data-request workflows and a privacy team's tooling usually shortlists Usercentrics or OneTrust instead.

Sales signal: Termly's numbers describe sign-ups and ours describe running banners. Prospect from ours, and drop builder sites when the business itself has to be the buyer.

Key takeaways

1. 42,303 live domains after removing 81,585 domain-for-sale pages; 14th of 129 in Consent & Privacy Management.

2. About 48% run on Duda, One.com, Mono.net or IONOS MyWebsite, and group.one owns both Termly and One.com.

3. Small and European-leaning: 62.53% have 1 to 10 staff, and European countries outnumber the US.

4. Real but small inflows from CookieYes (97) and Complianz (62); the roughly 3,300-domain Cookiebot move is Duda's.

5. The chart has one point because our detection only caught Termly's current banner from August 2026.

How to use this list

Filter by builder before you filter by size: a Duda or One.com site is a builder's customer first. For the full list of 42,303 Termly domains with company, size and stack data, explore TechnologyChecker.io. Our guide to technology detection methods explains why a script on a page doesn't always mean a customer.