Companies Using Allyant

I've spent more than a decade building crawlers and technographic systems, and Allyant is the one profile in this category that breaks the pattern the others follow. Our August 2026 crawl found it on 1,893 active domains and matched 1,440 of them to enriched company records, a 76.1% match rate. Everything below comes from that dataset plus the churn our crawler has watched directly since 16 March 2026.

Growth trajectory

Allyant enters our long-run detection history in January 2020 on a single domain and reaches 644 by July 2025. Our own crawler then reports 1,734 in June 2026 and 1,893 in both July and August. The step between those two blocks is the seam between measurement systems, so read it as coverage rather than customers. What matters is the ratio inside the crawl: 1.09x over three months, against a corpus that grew 1.18x from 321.0M to 380.0M active detections. Normalised, that's 0.93x, a slow loss of relative share while the absolute count still rises. The 2024 to 2025 dip on the chart is an artifact of the older feed shrinking its own universe, not a decline.

"A detection count that rises while the corpus rises faster is the easiest number in this business to misread. Allyant's absolute growth looks healthy. Its relative position is drifting down, and that's the honest read." - Mehmet Suleyman, Founder at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales Signal: Allyant sits at 1,893 domains against UserWay's 156,255, so this isn't a volume play. Its customer list is a qualified-buyer list, because these organisations already fund accessibility work, which is the hardest part of the sale.

Customer profile

The size distribution reads small, with 45.21% of enriched companies at ten or fewer employees and 25.68% in the 11 to 50 band. Sort the same detections by headcount, though, and the top is Veterans Affairs, UnitedHealth Group, Allied Universal, Spectrum and Walgreens, every one at 10,001+ staff. Two books of business live in one dataset: a long tail of small clinics and practices, and a short head of federal agencies and very large employers. Age backs the second group up. Only 15.32% of matched companies were founded in the 2020s, while 30.99% date to the 2010s and 9.68% predate 1990, with Travelers going back to 1853.

Sales Signal: Segment before writing anything. The 632 companies under ten staff and the 40 above 10,001 share only a document obligation, and a message built for one reads as noise to the other.

Industry and geographic concentration

Healthcare dominates. Medical Practices is the largest vertical at 35.39% of the top ten industries we display, and Hospitals and Health Care adds 24.82%, so just over 60% of that top ten is a single sector. Hospitality (6.87%) and Retail (6.16%) trail well behind. Geographically the United States takes 62.94% of enriched companies with a country on file and Canada takes 14.29%, a Canadian share that stands out for a vendor whose marquee accounts are US federal. The United Kingdom is third at 7.99%, then a thin tail through Finland (1.91%) and Australia (1.49%). Remediation needs a scope and a delivery team, and that does not cross borders the way a script tag does.

Sales Signal: Filter our detections to medical and hospital organisations in the US and Canada and you have most of Allyant's revenue base in a single list.

Migration patterns

Here Allyant separates from the rest of the category. Since 16 March 2026 we have watched 77 domains drop Allyant, 3.9% of the 1,979 we have ever recorded it on and the second-lowest churn rate among the ten vendors we profiled. Of those 77, only 6 picked up another accessibility tool, five going to UserWay and one to accessiBe. Inbound runs a little ahead at 10 domains, four of them from UserWay. Category-wide, between 0.7% and 3.5% of churn lands on a rival, so Allyant's 7.8% is at the top of that range, though six switches is too small a number to lean on hard.

"Seventy-one domains dropped Allyant and bought nothing to replace it. That's the finding of this whole category. Buyers aren't picking between vendors, they're deciding whether to keep doing the work at all." - Mehmet Suleyman, Founder at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales Signal: Churn here is a budget event, not a competitive loss. Those 71 domains are a renewal-risk list for Allyant and a re-engagement list for anyone selling accessibility services on a lighter commercial model.

Technology ecosystem

WordPress runs on 66.4% of Allyant domains and Drupal on 6.2%, with Google Analytics at 87.38%. Drupal at that level is a public sector and higher education signal, and the .gov and .edu detections in our set agree. Consent tooling is thinner than the healthcare mix would predict: OneTrust 8.41%, CookieYes 4.99%, Cookiebot 2.79%. Ecommerce is nearly absent, with Shopify at 4.05%. These buyers publish documents. They mostly don't sell online.

Sales Signal: Two-thirds of this base runs WordPress, so a WordPress-native audit or remediation workflow reaches most of Allyant's long tail with no custom integration.

What the review sites cannot tell you

We normally place review aggregate scores beside our detection data. Allyant has a G2 listing but too few reviews on it for G2 to publish its pros and cons summary, which is itself informative: the three firms it was assembled from sold through procurement and RFPs, not through a software marketplace where buyers leave star ratings. Review scores in accessibility measure the buying experience: onboarding, support response times, dashboard polish. They cannot measure the thing being bought, which is whether the output survives a screen reader or a legal complaint. The FTC filed a complaint against accessiBe in January 2025 over what its AI overlay claimed, and the $1M settlement became final that April. AudioEye has sued accessiBe for patent infringement. Courts have declined to treat overlay widgets as an ADA defence, and 3,117 federal website accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2025. None of that shows up in a star rating. Behaviour does, and Allyant's 3.9% churn is a revealed preference in a category where removal is the normal exit. If you want to see how these detections are produced, we wrote up our technology detection methods.

Sales Signal: With an FTC order and a live patent suit in this category, procurement teams are unusually open to evidence. Lead with audit methodology and named references rather than a feature grid.

Key takeaways

• Allyant is a document remediation service, not an overlay, so domain-count comparisons against widget vendors measure the wrong thing.
• 1,893 active domains, 0.44% category share, rank #10 of 32.
• 1.09x growth against a 1.18x corpus is a slow loss of relative share.
• Medical Practices and Hospitals together are just over 60% of the top ten industries.
• Churn is 3.9%, and 71 of the 77 departures replaced Allyant with nothing at all.

Sales applications

The outreach angle is the churn asymmetry. Allyant customers stay, so the ones who leave are worth asking about, and 71 of them currently run no accessibility vendor at all. The targeting filter is narrow and clean: US or Canadian healthcare organisations on WordPress or Drupal that already pay for a consent tool, which describes a buyer with a compliance budget and a named owner. The competitive angle is awkward for the overlay vendors, since UserWay shed 16,077 domains over the same window in which Allyant shed 77.

The full detection set for Allyant, with the company list, migration table and co-occurrence stack, is on TechnologyChecker.io and refreshes with our monthly crawl of 29.9M active domains.