Companies Using Backbone.js
Our database tracks 213,368 domains running Backbone.js, from enterprise tech companies to media organizations and e-commerce platforms. Below you'll find a full list of companies using Backbone.js including brands that use Backbone.js across diverse industries, with enriched data based on our monthly crawl of 29.9M live domains at TechnologyChecker.io.
Backbone.js holds a 3.1% share of the JavaScript frameworks market, ranking #8 in the category. We've enriched 131,910 of those domains with company data. Backbone.js is a legacy framework that stays deeply embedded once it ships: 20,635 domains have dropped it since we began tracking the library in March 2026, against the 213,368 that still run it.
Published Mar 12, 2026 · Updated Sep 4, 2026 · Data analysed on September 4, 2026.
Backbone.js Usage Statistics
Is Backbone.js still being used? Yes, on 213,368 active domains. Our current crawl window opens in June 2026, so this chart covers three months: Backbone.js was detected on 180,672 domains in June, 206,393 in July and 213,368 in August. Do not read that as a revival — total observed domains rose from 181,052 to 229,374 over the same period, so most of the movement is our crawl reaching further. The figure worth keeping is the churn: 20,635 domains have dropped Backbone.js since we began tracking it in March 2026, which is slow attrition for a library whose replacement has been available for a decade.
List of Companies Using Backbone.js
Download all 213,368 Backbone.js customers with full company data, or create a signal to track when companies start or stop using Backbone.js.
| Company | Detection URL | Domain | Country | Industry | Employees | Type | Founded | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| www.dex.siemens.com | siemens.com | Germany | Automation Machinery Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1847 | https://linkedin.com/company/siemens | |
| investors.upwork.com | upwork.com | United States | Software Development | 501-1000 | Public Company | 2015 | https://linkedin.com/company/upwork | |
| www.rtx.com | rtx.com | United States | Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | — | https://linkedin.com/company/rtx | |
| investors.delltechnologies.com | delltechnologies.com | United States | Computer Hardware Manufacturing | 10001+ | Privately Held | — | https://linkedin.com/company/delltechnologies | |
| investors.lockheedmartin.com | lockheedmartin.com | United States | Defense and Space Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1912 | https://linkedin.com/company/lockheed-martin | |
| www.inter.ikea.com | ikea.com | Netherlands | Retail | 10001+ | Privately Held | 1943 | https://linkedin.com/company/ikea | |
| photo.walgreens.com | walgreens.com | United States | Retail Pharmacies | 10001+ | Privately Held | 1901 | https://linkedin.com/company/walgreens | |
| traiteur.carrefour.fr | carrefour.fr | France | Retail | 10001+ | Public Company | 1995 | https://linkedin.com/company/carrefour | |
| espace-client-particulier.edf.fr | edf.fr | France | Electric Power Generation | 10001+ | Public Company | 1946 | https://linkedin.com/company/edf | |
| investorcenter.slb.com | slb.com | United States | Technology, Information and Internet | 10001+ | Public Company | 1926 | https://linkedin.com/company/slbglobal |
Show 15 more Backbone.js using companies as demo data
| Company | Detection URL | Country | Industry | Employees | Type | Founded | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| www.bestbuy.com | bestbuy.com | United States | Retail | 10001+ | Public Company | 1966 | https://linkedin.com/company/best-buy | |
| investors.aecom.com | aecom.com | United States | Civil Engineering | 10001+ | Public Company | 1990 | https://linkedin.com/company/aecom | |
| rigcount.bakerhughes.com | bakerhughes.com | United States | Energy Technology | 10001+ | Public Company | 2014 | https://linkedin.com/company/bakerhughes | |
| ascension.org | ascension.org | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 10001+ | Nonprofit | 1999 | https://linkedin.com/company/ascensionorg | |
| johnsoncontrols.com | johnsoncontrols.com | Ireland | Industrial Machinery Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1885 | https://linkedin.com/company/johnson-controls | |
| investors.kyndryl.com | kyndryl.com | United States | IT Services and IT Consulting | 10001+ | Public Company | 2021 | https://linkedin.com/company/kyndryl | |
| www.caterpillar.com | caterpillar.com | United States | Machinery Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1925 | https://linkedin.com/company/caterpillar-inc | |
| ir.halliburton.com | halliburton.com | United States | Oil and Gas | 10001+ | Public Company | 1919 | https://linkedin.com/company/halliburton | |
| investor.gehealthcare.com | gehealthcare.com | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 10001+ | Public Company | 1892 | https://linkedin.com/company/gehealthcare | |
| investors.abbvie.com | abbvie.com | United States | Pharmaceutical Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 2013 | https://linkedin.com/company/abbvie | |
| usbranchlocator.bmo.com | bmo.com | Canada | Financial Services | 10001+ | Public Company | 1817 | https://linkedin.com/company/bank-of-montreal | |
| collinsaerospace.com | collinsaerospace.com | United States | Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 2018 | https://linkedin.com/company/collins-aerospace | |
| ir.lear.com | lear.com | United States | Motor Vehicle Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1917 | https://linkedin.com/company/lear-corporation | |
| investor.dsv.com | dsv.com | Denmark | Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage | 10001+ | Public Company | 1976 | https://linkedin.com/company/dsv | |
| actualisationenrichie.francetravail.fr | francetravail.fr | France | Government Administration | 10001+ | Government Agency | — | https://linkedin.com/company/francetravail |
There are 213,368 companies and domains where we detect Backbone.js, sign up to download the entire Backbone.js dataset.
Here are some of the most recognizable companies using Backbone.js and brands using Backbone.js in 2026:
- Siemens AG -- Industrial automation group running Backbone.js on internal applications
- Dell Technologies -- Hardware manufacturer with Backbone.js across support and partner portals
- Lockheed Martin -- Defence contractor using Backbone.js on web properties
- RTX -- Aerospace and defence group with Backbone.js deployments
- Caterpillar -- Heavy equipment manufacturer running Backbone.js on dealer and product systems
- GE Healthcare -- Medical technology firm with Backbone.js applications
- IKEA -- Global retailer using Backbone.js on regional web properties
- Carrefour -- European grocery group with Backbone.js in customer systems
- Best Buy -- Retailer using Backbone.js for internal tools
- Upwork -- Freelance marketplace running Backbone.js on platform surfaces
Which Countries Use Backbone.js the Most?
Share of the 131,910 Backbone.js domains we matched to a company record — 61.8% of the 213,368 we detect. Top 15 countries shown, so these do not sum to 100%. Domains with no matching company record are not represented here and skew small and independent.
Backbone.js Market Share Among JavaScript Frameworks
What is Backbone.js's market share? Backbone.js holds a 3.1% share of the JavaScript frameworks market on 213,368 active domains, ranking #8 in the category, based on our monthly crawl of 29.9M live domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. It sits behind React (42.4%), Vue (12.59%), AMP (9%), React Router (5.7%), Zone.js (4.73%), Mustache (4.08%) and Alpine.js (3.99%). Despite its legacy status the framework holds a stable base across enterprise applications.
Top Competitors by Market Share
Backbone.js Customers by Company Size & Age
Company Size Distribution
Company Age (Founded Decade)
How old are companies using Backbone.js? Companies using Backbone.js are predominantly 2010s-founded, accounting for 37.04% of adopters based on our analysis of 131,910 enriched companies. The 2000s account for another 18.34% and the 2020s for 16.6%. That distribution mirrors the framework's peak years: most of these organisations built their first serious web applications while Backbone.js was the default answer to structuring one.
What Industries Use Backbone.js the Most?
Backbone.js Alternatives & Competitors
What are Backbone.js's alternatives? Backbone.js ranks #8 at 3.1% in a category led by React (42.4%) and Vue (12.59%), both of which offer the component model and reactive data binding that Backbone.js leaves to the developer. This page publishes no switching numbers. Backbone.js persists inside stacks that long ago added other tooling around it: of the domains that have ever run both Backbone.js and Underscore.js, 92.2% still run both — and Underscore is Backbone's own hard dependency, not a rival — while the reading is 82.4% for React, 80.3% for Vue and 76.2% for Mustache. Those are the pieces Backbone.js was designed to sit beside, so their comings and goings describe a bundle changing shape rather than anyone leaving Backbone.js for them.
| Technology | Domains | Market Share |
|---|---|---|
| 2,920,537 | 42.4% | |
| 867,190 | 12.59% | |
| 620,012 | 9% | |
| 392,715 | 5.7% | |
| 326,044 | 4.73% |
Tech Stack of Backbone.js-Powered Websites
What technologies pair with Backbone.js? Based on 131,910 enriched companies, Backbone.js domains almost universally carry its own dependencies: Underscore.js (96.6%) and Lodash (95.04%) top the list, with jQuery at 93.02% close behind. That near-total overlap is not a coincidence or a preference — Backbone.js requires Underscore, which is why any "switching" analysis between the two is meaningless. Google Analytics (56.07%) handles measurement on more than half of these domains, and Modernizr and jQuery Migrate appear frequently — libraries whose whole purpose is supporting older browsers, which tells you what kind of estate this is.
Analytics & Tag Management
JavaScript Libraries


CDN & Hosting
UI & CSS Frameworks
Backbone.js Customer Reviews with Pros and Cons
What do developers think about Backbone.js? Based on aggregated G2 reviews, Backbone.js scores highest for its lightweight design and flexibility. The most common criticism is the amount of boilerplate code it requires compared with modern component frameworks — the same minimalism that reviewers praise is what makes it verbose in larger applications.
Generated from real user reviews on G2
- Users consistently praise the product for its lightweight design and flexibility, allowing for easy customization and integration with other libraries.
- Many appreciate how it promotes a clear separation of concerns, making it suitable for both small and large applications.
- However, some note a common limitation in the need for boilerplate code, which can increase complexity for new users.
Expert Analysis: Backbone.js Growth Trends & Key Signals for Sales Teams in 2026

Our crawling infrastructure picks up signals that vendor marketing pages never show. Here's what we see when we look at Backbone.js through that lens.
1. The Level, Not the Direction
Backbone.js runs on 213,368 active domains, which is 3.1% of the JavaScript frameworks category and #8 by rank. I want to be careful about the trend, because it is the easiest thing to get wrong on a page like this.
Our current crawl window covers June to August 2026 and Backbone.js rises across it, from 180,672 to 213,368. That is not a revival — total observed domains rose from 181,052 to 229,374 in the same three months, so the crawl is widening faster than the framework is moving. Equally, we do not publish a long archive series here, so I will not assert a multi-year direction either. The number I will stand behind is the churn: 20,635 domains have dropped Backbone.js since March 2026, against 213,368 that still run it. That is roughly one in eleven, over five months, which is slow.
Sales Signal: Treat this as a large, stable maintenance market rather than a collapsing one. The addressable population is not shrinking fast enough to create urgency, which means "rip and replace" pitches will keep failing here.
2. Customer Profile: Enterprises Maintaining, Not Adopting
The detected roster is heavy industry and defence: Siemens, Dell Technologies, Lockheed Martin, RTX, Caterpillar, GE Healthcare, Halliburton, Schlumberger, Johnson Controls, Collins Aerospace, IKEA and Carrefour. These are not teams experimenting; they are organisations with complex applications built years ago and still in daily service.
By count, though, the population is small: 65.49% of enriched Backbone.js domains belong to companies with 1-10 employees and 21.28% to companies with 11-50. 37.04% of adopters were founded in the 2010s, 18.34% in the 2000s. The enterprises are the recognisable names; the long tail is small agencies and businesses running something a contractor built for them.
Sales Signal: These buyers do not rewrite lightly — they are risk-averse and budget-constrained, and rewriting working software is politically hard to justify. Tools that help maintain a Backbone.js codebase (testing, monitoring, security patching) sell better here than migration services.
3. Industry and Geography
Full breakdowns are available on this profile now, and they are flatter than the company roster suggests. Construction leads at 3.37% of enriched Backbone.js domains, followed by Real Estate (3.27%) and Business Consulting and Services (2.85%). No industry exceeds about one domain in thirty — this is a general-purpose library that ended up everywhere rather than one that won a vertical.
Geographically the United States leads with 44,659 domains, followed by the United Kingdom at 11,310, Germany (6,819) and France (4,908). Note this is the ordering our country data usually shows and that Vue and Mustache both break, with Germany second. Backbone.js is the conventionally-distributed one of the three.
Sales Signal: The US and UK carry the bulk of this market. High developer costs in both make rewriting legacy code expensive, which is precisely why the code is still there.
4. Why This Profile Publishes No Switching Numbers
This profile reports no migration wave in or out of Backbone.js, and Backbone.js is the clearest example on the site of why not.
The test is what share of domains that ever ran both technologies still run both. For Backbone.js and Underscore.js that figure is 92.2% — and Underscore.js is Backbone's hard dependency. It cannot be a migration target; the library will not run without it. The same structure shows up more weakly across the rest of the category: 82.4% for React, 80.3% for Vue, 76.2% for Mustache. A switching query cannot tell "replaced A with B" apart from "added B alongside A", and in this category it is almost always the second.
Sales Signal: Any list of "companies migrating off Backbone.js" should be checked against how many still run Backbone.js. If most of them do, you are buying a list of teams that added a framework next to it — which is a different, and much less urgent, conversation.
5. The Backbone.js Technology Stack
The co-occurrence data is dominated by dependencies rather than choices. Underscore.js appears on 96.6% of Backbone.js domains and Lodash on 95.04%, with jQuery at 93.02%. Backbone.js requires Underscore and was written in a jQuery-shaped world, so these numbers describe the library's architecture, not its users' preferences.
What the rest of the stack tells you is the age of the estate. Modernizr (36.14% on comparable profiles) and jQuery Migrate exist to paper over old browsers. Google Analytics instruments 56.07%. On styling, Bootstrap leads Tailwind CSS — the reverse of what Vue domains show.
Sales Signal: This stack cannot tolerate breaking changes. Anything pitched at these teams should emphasise backward compatibility and incremental adoption; a tool requiring a modern build pipeline excludes most of this population on day one.
Key Takeaways
Backbone.js holds 213,368 domains at 3.1% share, ranking #8 — a large, slowly-eroding maintenance market rather than a dying one, with 20,635 domains dropped since March 2026. Its users are split between recognisable industrial and defence enterprises (Siemens, Lockheed Martin, Caterpillar, Dell) and a long tail of very small companies. This profile publishes no switching table, and Backbone.js shows exactly why: 92.2% of domains that ever ran it alongside Underscore.js still run both, because Backbone.js does not function without Underscore.js.
Sales Applications
For teams using TechnologyChecker.io, Backbone.js data supports three angles:
1. Maintenance over migration: churn is roughly one domain in eleven since March 2026. These teams are not leaving, so sell them tooling that reduces the cost of staying.
2. The enterprise defence and industrial cluster: Lockheed Martin, RTX, Collins Aerospace, Caterpillar and Siemens all appear. Long sales cycles, high compliance requirements, stable contracts.
3. The jQuery estate: 93.02% of Backbone.js domains also run jQuery. These are observably old front ends, and the overlap is a dependency fact rather than an inference, which makes it a defensible basis for outreach.
Explore the full dataset at TechnologyChecker.io and filter by company size, geography and tech stack across 213,368 Backbone.js domains with 131,910 enriched company profiles.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who uses Backbone.js?
We detect Backbone.js on 213,368 domains, including Siemens AG, Upwork Enterprise, RTX Corp. A detection means the technology is present on that domain, which for large organisations is often a single storefront or subdomain rather than a company-wide deployment. Among domains we matched to a company with a resolved industry, the most common is Construction (3.37%).
How many customers does Backbone.js have?
We detect 213,368 domains running Backbone.js across our monthly crawl of live business domains. Company data could be matched for 131,910 of them (61.8%), and every company-size, industry and country breakdown on this page describes that matched subset rather than the full detected base. A further 20,635 domains carried a Backbone.js detection previously and no longer do.
What is Backbone.js's market share?
Backbone.js holds 3.1% of the JavaScript Frameworks category, ranking #8. This is a share of the domains we detect running a platform in this category — not a share of all websites, and not a share of spending — so it is not directly comparable to figures published on other denominators.
What are the best alternatives to Backbone.js?
The top alternatives to Backbone.js include React (42.4% market share), Vue.js (12.59% market share), AMP (9% market share), React Router (5.7% market share) — measured as a share of the domains we detect running a platform in this category.
Which countries use Backbone.js the most?
United States leads with 44,659 matched Backbone.js domains, followed by United Kingdom (11,310), Germany (6,819), France (4,908), Spain (4,853). These are counts within the 131,910 domains we could match to a company record, not the full detected base.
What size companies use Backbone.js?
The most common company size is 1-10 employees, representing 65.49% of the Backbone.js domains we could match to a company record and size — a subset of 131,910 matched companies, not of all 213,368 detected domains. This is followed by 11-50 employees (21.28%) and 51-200 employees (7.8%).
How old are companies that use Backbone.js?
Among the Backbone.js domains we could match to a company with a known founding date, most were founded in the 2010s (37.04%), followed by the 2000s (18.34%). That matched subset is drawn from 131,910 companies and is not representative of all 213,368 detected domains. This suggests Backbone.js is most popular among relatively young companies.
What is the ideal customer profile for Backbone.js?
The ideal Backbone.js customer is: Founded: 2010-2019, Company Age: ~7-15 years old, Company Type: Public Companies & Gov Agencies, Company Size: 10001+ employees, Industry: Enterprise Tech & Manufacturing — based on our analysis of 131,910 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.
Is Backbone.js still supported in 2026?
Yes. Backbone.js continues to receive updates — version 1.6 was released in July 2024, so the framework remains actively maintained. New adoption has largely stopped, with most activity focused on maintaining existing applications rather than building new ones. Our data shows 213,368 active domains still running it.
What are the biggest companies using Backbone.js?
Major Backbone.js users detected in our crawl include Siemens, Dell Technologies, Lockheed Martin, RTX, Caterpillar, GE Healthcare, IKEA, Carrefour, Best Buy and Upwork. These are primarily enterprise-scale organisations that built complex applications during Backbone's peak years and still run them. By domain count, though, most Backbone.js sites belong to very small companies: 65.49% have 1-10 employees.
Is Backbone.js frontend or backend?
Backbone.js is a frontend JavaScript library used to structure client-side web applications. It provides models with key-value binding, collections with enumerable functions, and views with declarative event handling. All running in the browser and connecting to backend APIs via RESTful JSON interfaces.
Why do companies still use Backbone.js?
Companies continue using Backbone.js because they have working, business-critical applications built 8-15 years ago that are expensive to rewrite. Our data shows heavy adoption among risk-averse sectors like pharmaceuticals, government, manufacturing, and finance where stability outweighs the appeal of modern frameworks. Rewriting working code requires budget justification many can't make.
How does Backbone.js compare to Vue.js?
Vue.js offers reactive data binding, a component architecture and a gentler learning curve; Backbone.js is more minimal and leaves those decisions to you. We publish no migration figures between them. 80.3% of domains that have ever run both still run both, which means a switching count would mostly be measuring pages that added Vue beside Backbone rather than pages that replaced one with the other.
What technologies are commonly used with Backbone.js?
Based on 131,910 analysed companies, Backbone.js domains almost universally run Underscore.js (96.6%) and Lodash (95.04%), with jQuery at 93.02%. Underscore.js is Backbone's hard dependency, so that overlap is structural rather than a preference. Beyond the dependencies, Google Analytics appears on 56.07%, and compatibility libraries such as Modernizr and jQuery Migrate are common — a signature of an older front-end estate.
Is Backbone.js free to use?
Yes, Backbone.js is completely free and open source under the MIT License. There are no subscription fees, usage limits, or commercial licensing requirements. The framework can be used in both personal and commercial projects without cost, making it accessible for any budget.
What industries use Backbone.js the most?
Based on our enriched company data, Construction leads at 3.37% of Backbone.js domains, followed by Real Estate (3.27%) and Business Consulting and Services (2.85%). The spread is unusually flat — no industry holds more than about one domain in thirty. The recognisable enterprise names cluster in heavy industry and defence (Siemens, Caterpillar, Lockheed Martin, RTX, Collins Aerospace), energy (Halliburton, Schlumberger) and retail (IKEA, Carrefour, Best Buy).
Can Backbone.js work with React or Vue?
Yes, Backbone.js can coexist with React or Vue during gradual migrations. Many teams wrap Backbone views inside React components or use Vue to replace Backbone views one component at a time. This incremental approach reduces risk compared to full rewrites, allowing teams to modernize without downtime.
What happened to Backbone.js popularity?
Backbone.js has not been a default choice for new projects in years, but our data does not support a specific decline figure. We publish only the current crawl window, June to August 2026, and Backbone.js rose across it from 180,672 to 213,368 active domains — mostly because our crawl widened rather than because adoption grew. What we can measure is churn: 20,635 domains dropped Backbone.js between March and September 2026, roughly one in eleven. Remaining usage is overwhelmingly maintenance of applications that already work.
Why migrate from Backbone.js to modern frameworks?
Companies migrate from Backbone.js to get reactive data binding, better TypeScript support, larger talent pools and richer component ecosystems. We do not publish a most-common-target figure: the domains running Backbone.js alongside Vue or React overwhelmingly still run Backbone.js too (80.3% and 82.4% respectively), so what our data actually shows is frameworks being added beside Backbone.js during long, incremental migrations rather than clean switches.
What countries use Backbone.js the most?
Based on our enriched company data, Backbone.js usage concentrates in the United States (44,659 domains), the United Kingdom (11,310), Germany (6,819) and France (4,908). That US-then-UK ordering is the conventional shape for our country breakdowns — notably both Vue and Mustache break it, with Germany in second place.
Is learning Backbone.js worth it in 2026?
Learning Backbone.js makes sense mainly for maintaining existing applications. With 213,368 active domains still running it at organisations including Siemens, Dell and Lockheed Martin, maintenance skills stay valuable for contractors and consultants, and the attrition rate is slow — about one domain in eleven dropped it in the last five months. For new projects, though, invest in React, Vue or Svelte.
Based on 131,910 company data
These insights include all TechnologyChecker.io detections of Backbone.js (free & paid plans).