Companies Using New Relic
Our database tracks 167,893 companies using New Relic, from DevOps startups to Fortune 500 brands that use New Relic like Deloitte, IBM, Bank of America, and Ryanair. Below you'll find a full list of companies using New Relic with market share, industry breakdowns, and geographic data. Vendor-verified customers include Mercado Libre (which cut its error rate to zero), AB InBev (80% MTTR improvement), and Skyscanner (replaced 12 monitoring tools).
New Relic holds the largest APM detection footprint in our dataset with nearly 8x the reach of Datadog. The top companies using New Relic span Starbucks, Shell, Samsung, and Australia Post alongside thousands of websites using New Relic for APM, infrastructure monitoring, and real user monitoring. Data updated monthly across 50M+ domains.
Published Mar 27, 2026 · Updated Mar 27, 2026 · Data analysed on March 27, 2026.
New Relic Usage Statistics
New Relic has grown from a single detected domain in January 2011 to 142,952 active domains at its peak in March 2025. The platform doubled from 27,000 to 52,800 active domains between 2018 and 2020. Australia Post's case study captures the pandemic catalyst: they hit 340M transactions in April 2020, nearly double their normal Christmas peak. That kind of traffic shock pushed engineering teams toward real-time observability. Growth continued past 100,000 active domains by early 2024.
List of Companies Using New Relic
Download all 167,893 New Relic customers with full company data, or create a signal to track when companies start or stop using New Relic.
| Company | Detection URL | Domain | Country | Industry | Employees | Type | Founded | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| alm.deloitte.com | deloitte.com | United States | Business Consulting and Services | 10001+ | Privately Held | 1900 | https://linkedin.com/company/deloitte | |
| ibm.com | ibm.com | United States | IT Services and IT Consulting | 10001+ | Public Company | 1911 | https://linkedin.com/company/ibm | |
| investors.capgemini.com | capgemini.com | France | IT Services and IT Consulting | 10001+ | Public Company | 1967 | https://linkedin.com/company/capgemini | |
| wipro.com | wipro.com | India | IT Services and IT Consulting | 10001+ | Public Company | 1945 | https://linkedin.com/company/wipro | |
| siemens.com | siemens.com | Germany | Automation Machinery Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1847 | https://linkedin.com/company/siemens | |
| ftp-hbs.bankofamerica.com | bankofamerica.com | United States | Banking | 10001+ | Public Company | 1998 | https://linkedin.com/company/bank-of-america | |
| wellsfargo.com | wellsfargo.com | United States | Financial Services | 10001+ | Public Company | — | https://linkedin.com/company/wellsfargo | |
| marriott.com | marriott.com | United States | Hospitality | 10001+ | Public Company | 1927 | https://linkedin.com/company/marriott-international | |
| mortgageapply-uat.us.hsbc.com | hsbc.com | United Kingdom | Financial Services | 10001+ | Public Company | 1865 | https://linkedin.com/company/hsbc | |
| concentrix.com | concentrix.com | United States | IT Services and IT Consulting | 10001+ | Public Company | 1983 | https://linkedin.com/company/concentrix |
Show 37 more New Relic using companies as demo data
| Company | Detection URL | Country | Industry | Employees | Type | Founded | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| starbucks.com | starbucks.com | United States | Retail | 10001+ | Public Company | 1971 | https://linkedin.com/company/starbucks | |
| developer.shell.com | shell.com | United Kingdom | Oil and Gas | 10001+ | Public Company | 1833 | https://linkedin.com/company/shell | |
| notification.canada.ca | canada.ca | Canada | Government Administration | 10001+ | Government Agency | 1867 | https://linkedin.com/company/government-of-canada | |
| samsung.com | samsung.com | South Korea | Computers and Electronics Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1938 | https://linkedin.com/company/samsung-electronics | |
| rb-jamfpro-q.bosch.com | bosch.com | Germany | Software Development | 10001+ | Privately Held | 1886 | https://linkedin.com/company/bosch | |
| jobs.navair.navy.mil | navy.mil | United States | Armed Forces | 10001+ | Government Agency | 1775 | https://linkedin.com/company/us-navy | |
| ge.com | ge.com | United States | Industrial Machinery Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1892 | https://linkedin.com/company/ge | |
| connect.allianz.com | allianz.com | Germany | Financial Services | 10001+ | Public Company | 1890 | https://linkedin.com/company/allianz | |
| abbott.com | abbott.com | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 10001+ | Public Company | 1980 | https://linkedin.com/company/abbott- | |
| pepsico.com | pepsico.com | United States | Food and Beverage Services | 10001+ | Public Company | 1965 | https://linkedin.com/company/pepsico | |
| techmahindra.com | techmahindra.com | India | IT Services and IT Consulting | 10001+ | Public Company | 1986 | https://linkedin.com/company/tech-mahindra | |
| hp.com | hp.com | United States | IT Services and IT Consulting | 10001+ | Public Company | 2011 | https://linkedin.com/company/hp | |
| magazine.hcahealthcare.com | hcahealthcare.com | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 10001+ | Public Company | 1968 | https://linkedin.com/company/hca | |
| vodafone.com | vodafone.com | United Kingdom | Telecommunications | 10001+ | Public Company | 1982 | https://linkedin.com/company/vodafone | |
| axa.com | axa.com | France | Insurance | 10001+ | Public Company | — | https://linkedin.com/company/axa | |
| genome-uat.genpact.com | genpact.com | United States | Business Consulting and Services | 10001+ | Public Company | 1997 | https://linkedin.com/company/genpact | |
| walgreensbootsalliance.com | walgreensbootsalliance.com | United States | Retail Pharmacies | 10001+ | Public Company | 2014 | https://linkedin.com/company/walgreens-boots-alliance | |
| jnj.com | jnj.com | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 10001+ | Public Company | 1887 | https://linkedin.com/company/johnson-&-johnson | |
| delltechnologies.com | delltechnologies.com | United States | Computer Hardware Manufacturing | 10001+ | Privately Held | — | https://linkedin.com/company/delltechnologies | |
| cvshealth.com | cvshealth.com | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 10001+ | Public Company | 1963 | https://linkedin.com/company/cvshealth | |
| honeywell.com | honeywell.com | United States | Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1974 | https://linkedin.com/company/honeywell | |
| homedepot.com | homedepot.com | United States | Retail | 10001+ | Public Company | 1977 | https://linkedin.com/company/the-home-depot | |
| telefonica.com | telefonica.com | Spain | Telecommunications | 10001+ | Privately Held | 1924 | https://linkedin.com/company/telefonica | |
| adviceadvantage.ubs.com | ubs.com | Switzerland | Financial Services | 10001+ | Public Company | 1862 | https://linkedin.com/company/ubs | |
| credito-imobiliario.itau.com.br | itau.com.br | Brazil | Banking | 10001+ | Privately Held | 1924 | https://linkedin.com/company/itau | |
| prod-iap-omni.stellantis.com | stellantis.com | Netherlands | Motor Vehicle Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 2021 | https://linkedin.com/company/stellantis | |
| statefarm.com | statefarm.com | United States | Insurance | 10001+ | Privately Held | 1922 | https://linkedin.com/company/state_farm | |
| gm.com | gm.com | United States | Motor Vehicle Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | — | https://linkedin.com/company/general-motors | |
| lowes.com | lowes.com | United States | Retail | 10001+ | Public Company | 1921 | https://linkedin.com/company/lowe's-home-improvement | |
| roche.com | roche.com | Switzerland | Biotechnology Research | 10001+ | Public Company | 1896 | https://linkedin.com/company/roche | |
| tdwealthadvantage.td.com | td.com | Canada | Banking | 10001+ | Public Company | 2007 | https://linkedin.com/company/td | |
| unitedhealthgroup.com | unitedhealthgroup.com | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 10001+ | Public Company | 1980 | https://linkedin.com/company/unitedhealth-group | |
| talentnetwork.adp.com | adp.com | United States | Human Resources Services | 10001+ | Public Company | 1949 | https://linkedin.com/company/adp | |
| pfizer.com | pfizer.com | United States | Pharmaceutical Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1848 | https://linkedin.com/company/pfizer | |
| nokia.com | nokia.com | Finland | Telecommunications | 10001+ | Public Company | 1865 | https://linkedin.com/company/nokia | |
| verizon.com | verizon.com | United States | IT Services and IT Consulting | 10001+ | Public Company | 1983 | https://linkedin.com/company/verizon | |
| medtronic.com | medtronic.com | United States | Medical Equipment Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1949 | https://linkedin.com/company/medtronic |
There are 167,893 companies and websites using New Relic, sign up to download the entire New Relic dataset.
Here are some of the most recognizable companies using New Relic and brands using New Relic in 2026:
- Deloitte - Global consulting firm using New Relic across multiple internal platforms (detected in our data)
- IBM - Technology giant with New Relic deployed on ibm.com (detected in our data)
- Mercado Libre - Latin America's largest ecommerce platform, cut error rate to zero and response time to under 50ms with New Relic, per New Relic's published case studies
- Ryanair - Europe's #1 airline, monitors 1.3M daily website visitors and tracks real-time seat sales with New Relic, per their published case study
- AB InBev - World's largest beer company, improved mean time to resolve by 80% across 500+ brands, per New Relic's published case studies
- Verizon - Uses New Relic's Pixie for 5G Edge Kubernetes observability across 19 AWS Wavelength Zones, per their case study
- Skyscanner - Travel search platform that replaced 12 monitoring tools with New Relic and freed 10 engineers, per their published case study
- Shutterstock - Stock media platform that cut logging spend by 60% and report generation time by 75% with New Relic
- Starbucks - Global retail brand using New Relic for digital experience monitoring (detected in our data)
- Australia Post - Handled 340M transactions during April 2020 pandemic surge using New Relic observability, per their case study
- Bank of America - Financial institution monitoring banking tools with New Relic (detected in our data)
- Shell - Energy company using New Relic on developer.shell.com and consumer login systems (detected in our data)
Which Countries Use New Relic the Most?
Which countries use New Relic the most? The United States dominates with 52.9% of all enriched customers, but New Relic's global footprint extends across 50+ countries. Brazil (8.1%) and the United Kingdom (6.1%) round out the top three. Together, English-speaking countries account for over 65% of the user base, based on our enriched company data.
New Relic Market Share Among Real User Monitoring (RUM)
What is New Relic's market share? New Relic holds the largest detection footprint in the observability space with 167,893 active domains, nearly 8x Datadog (22,671) and 11x Dynatrace (14,577), based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. Only Sentry (802,694 domains), which focuses on error tracking rather than full-stack observability, shows a larger footprint.
Top Competitors by Market Share
New Relic Customers by Company Size & Age
Is New Relic only for large enterprises? Despite its Fortune 500 reputation, 66.7% of New Relic customers have 1-10 employees based on our analysis of 72,674 enriched companies. Small teams and startups adopt New Relic's free tier (100 GB/month, 1 full user) for quick wins on monitoring. That said, the enterprise tail is heavier than most tools we track: 2.1% of customers have 10,001+ employees, including Deloitte, IBM, and Bank of America.
Company Size Distribution
Company Age (Founded Decade)
What Industries Use New Relic the Most?
Retail is the top industry at 8.77%, followed by Real Estate (4.91%) and Medical Practices (4.35%). Software Development and IT Consulting together account for 6.67%. The long tail is significant: no single industry exceeds 9%, which makes New Relic a genuinely horizontal platform, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.
Retail brands using New Relic account for the platform's largest vertical at 8.77%. Starbucks, Home Depot, and Lowe's all show active detections, and Domino's UK tracks pizza delivery SLOs through New Relic's service level management (per their published case study). Financial services companies on New Relic like Bank of America, Wells Fargo, HSBC, and UBS represent a high-value segment at 2.14%. Travel and transport companies using New Relic include Ryanair (monitoring 1.3M daily visitors), Skyscanner (replaced 12 tools), and Australia Post (handled 340M pandemic-surge transactions), all vendor-verified, based on our enriched company data.
New Relic Alternatives & Competitors
New Relic competes across the full observability spectrum, based on our market share data across 50M+ crawled domains. Sentry (802,694 domains) leads on raw detection count but focuses on error tracking, not full-stack APM. Datadog (22,671 domains) is the closest full-stack rival, growing quickly in cloud-native environments. Dynatrace (14,577 domains) targets enterprise AIOps. Grafana (9,227 domains) appeals to teams that prefer open-source observability stacks.
| Technology | Domains | Market Share |
|---|---|---|
| 22,671 | 7.08% | |
| 14,577 | 4.55% | |
| 9,227 | 2.88% | |
| 1,788 | 0.56% | |
| 802,694 | 250.78% |
New Relic Customer Migration
Based on 72,673 enriched companies, New Relic's migration data shows a mixed picture. The platform gained 1,866 companies from Dynatrace and 495 from AppDynamics, reflecting enterprise consolidation toward unified observability. Skyscanner's case study illustrates the pattern: they replaced 12 monitoring tools (including point solutions for APM, logs, and synthetics) with New Relic alone, freeing 10 engineers. Against Datadog, New Relic lost 1,725 companies while gaining 1,169, a 0.68:1 loss ratio. The Sentry corridor (16,791 lost vs. 9,726 gained) is the largest flow, though many companies run both for different layers of the stack.
| Competitor | Gained | Lost | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
+9,726 | -16.8k | -7,065 | |
+1,169 | -1,725 | -556 | |
+1,866 | -946 | +920 | |
+495 | -142 | +353 | |
+312 | -212 | +100 |
Tech Stack of New Relic-Powered Websites
Based on 72,673 enriched companies, New Relic customers most commonly pair the platform with AngularJS (10.38%) for frontend frameworks and HubSpot (8.20%) for marketing automation. Drupal (6.53%) leads CMS adoption, and Magento (6.35%) tops ecommerce. The AngularJS prevalence suggests many New Relic customers run mature enterprise web applications rather than newer React/Vue stacks.
CMS
JavaScript Frameworks
E-Commerce
Marketing Automation
New Relic Customer Reviews with Pros and Cons
Based on aggregated G2 reviews (398 total pro mentions, 254 total con mentions), New Relic scores highest for its user-friendly interface (97 mentions) and real-time monitoring (95 mentions). Ryanair's ops team backs this up: they run nine New Relic dashboards on the office wall and use it "every minute of every day" (per their case study). The most common criticism relates to pricing that escalates with data volume (63 mentions). Shutterstock addressed this by consolidating logging onto New Relic, cutting spend by 60% while improving report generation speed by 75%.
Generated from real user reviews on G2
- Users value the user-friendly interface of New Relic, which simplifies navigation and enhances overall monitoring efficiency.(97 reviews)
- Users value the real-time monitoring of New Relic, enabling swift issue detection and resolution to enhance performance.(95 reviews)
- Users value the real-time monitoring capabilities of New Relic, ensuring proactive issue detection and resolution.(75 reviews)
- Users value the intuitive user interface and real-time performance insights that enhance application monitoring and troubleshooting.(69 reviews)
- Users value the real-time insights from New Relic, appreciating its comprehensive view for quick issue identification and system understanding.(62 reviews)
- Users find the cost can be steep, especially as data usage increases, which can limit accessibility.(63 reviews)
- Users are frustrated by the high pricing of New Relic, which can be a barrier for many teams.(53 reviews)
- Users find the complexity of New Relic's setup and interface to be overwhelming, affecting usability for newcomers.(50 reviews)
- Users face a steep learning curve with New Relic, making setup and configuration initially challenging and time-consuming.(50 reviews)
- Users find the complex setup of New Relic daunting, demanding significant time and effort to navigate effectively.(38 reviews)
Expert Analysis: New Relic Growth Trends & Key Signals for Sales Teams in 2026

With 10+ years in web crawling and technographic data analysis, I've examined New Relic's position using our enriched dataset of 72,674 companies matched from 167,893 active domains where New Relic is detected. This analysis draws on our detection data, migration patterns, technology stack overlaps, and G2 review sentiment as of our March 2026 crawl.
1. Growth trajectory
New Relic's adoption curve tells a clear story of steady enterprise penetration. From a single detected domain in January 2011, the platform grew to 142,952 active domains by March 2025. The growth wasn't explosive like some SaaS tools. It was linear and persistent, averaging about 10,000 new active domains per year from 2016 to 2023. That acceleration picked up in 2024, jumping from 98,990 to 139,577 active domains in 12 months.
Two inflection points stand out. First, the 2017-2018 period when New Relic expanded beyond APM into infrastructure monitoring and browser analytics. Second, the 2020-2021 pandemic wave when every company suddenly needed real-time visibility into digital services they'd never had to monitor at scale before.
Sales Signal: The consistent growth curve means the addressable market keeps expanding. New Relic's free tier (100 GB/month) acts as a land-and-expand funnel. Sales teams should target companies that outgrew the free tier within the last 12 months.
"New Relic's growth pattern is unlike most SaaS tools we track. It doesn't spike and plateau. It compounds year over year, which tells me the platform embeds deeply into engineering workflows once adopted." - Mehmet Suleyman, CEO at TechnologyChecker.io
2. Customer profile
The customer profile is surprisingly bimodal. On one end, 66.7% of New Relic customers have 1-10 employees, consistent with startups and small agencies monitoring a few services. On the other end, 2.1% have 10,001+ employees, and these include some of the world's largest corporations: Deloitte (495,128 LinkedIn members), IBM, Bank of America, Siemens, Samsung, and Shell.
The age data reinforces this: 36.09% of customers were founded in the 2010s, the cloud-native generation. But 10.55% predate 1960, meaning century-old institutions like Siemens (1847), HSBC (1865), and Johnson & Johnson (1887) also rely on New Relic. Vendor-published case studies from newrelic.com/customers confirm names like Verizon, Domino's, Toyota, Ryanair, and Mercado Libre as active deployments. The outcomes are real: Mercado Libre cut its error rate to zero and got response times under 50ms. AB InBev improved MTTR by 80% across its 500+ beer brands. Ryanair monitors 1.3M daily website visitors and tracks real-time seat sales on nine screens in its operations center. That said, many enterprise detections (like Deloitte's alm.deloitte.com) are on internal tools and microsites, not company-wide rollouts.
Sales Signal: The bimodal distribution means two distinct sales motions. For startups, lead with the free tier and time-to-value. For enterprises, lead with consolidation value, as many of these companies also run Datadog or Dynatrace on different services.
3. Industry and geographic concentration
Retail leads at 8.77%, but no single industry exceeds 9%, making New Relic one of the most horizontal platforms in our dataset. Real Estate (4.91%) and Medical Practices (4.35%) are unexpected runners-up, likely driven by property management portals and patient-facing health apps that need uptime monitoring.
Geographically, the United States accounts for 52.9%, followed by Brazil at 8.1% and the UK at 6.1%. Brazil's strength (5,916 companies) isn't just our detection data. Mercado Libre, Latin America's largest ecommerce platform, runs New Relic across 13 countries and reduced VM usage by 20% (per their published case study). Itau Unibanco and PicPay (which cut incidents by 65%) confirm Brazil as a New Relic stronghold. In APAC, Tokopedia, Swiggy, and the Government of India's COVID contact tracing app all run on New Relic.
Sales Signal: Brazil and India (1,164 companies) are underserved relative to their detection counts. Teams selling into LATAM should note that New Relic's Portuguese documentation and Sao Paulo presence give it a local advantage over Datadog in the region.
4. Migration patterns
Migration data reveals competitive pressure points. New Relic gained 1,866 companies from Dynatrace and 495 from AppDynamics, reflecting the ongoing shift from legacy APM to modern observability platforms. Against Datadog, the picture is tighter: 1,169 gained vs. 1,725 lost, a 0.68:1 ratio that suggests Datadog is winning cloud-native workloads.
The Sentry corridor is the largest but misleading. New Relic lost 16,791 companies to Sentry while gaining 9,726. However, Sentry is an error tracking tool, not a direct APM competitor. Many companies run both. The "loss" likely means companies added Sentry for frontend error tracking while keeping New Relic for infrastructure.
Sales Signal: Two-sided opportunity here. For companies leaving Dynatrace or AppDynamics, position New Relic's consumption pricing (no host-based fees) as the migration incentive. For companies adding Datadog, highlight consolidation savings.
"The Dynatrace-to-New Relic corridor, 1,866 companies migrating, is the clearest signal that enterprises are moving away from per-host pricing models toward consumption-based observability." - Mehmet Suleyman, CEO at TechnologyChecker.io
5. Technology ecosystem
The tech stack data reveals what kind of companies adopt New Relic. AngularJS leads at 10.38%, suggesting a mature enterprise codebase rather than newer startups (which would skew React or Next.js). HubSpot at 8.20% indicates marketing-driven companies with complex lead-to-customer funnels. Drupal at 6.53% and Magento at 6.35% point to content-heavy and ecommerce-heavy deployments.
The absence of newer frameworks (React, Next.js) in the top ranks is telling. New Relic's customer base trends toward established codebases that have been in production for years, not greenfield projects.
Sales Signal: Companies running AngularJS and Magento are likely dealing with legacy performance issues. Position New Relic's APM traces and distributed tracing as the solution for diagnosing slow legacy services before a costly rewrite.
6. G2 review signals
G2 reviews paint a clear picture of New Relic's strengths and vulnerabilities. The user-friendly interface (97 mentions) and real-time monitoring (95 mentions) dominate the positive sentiment. This aligns with our detection data: the platform's widespread adoption across non-technical industries (Real Estate, Medical Practices) suggests it doesn't require deep SRE expertise to get value.
On the negative side, cost escalation with data volume (63 mentions) is the top criticism. This maps directly to our migration data: the 1,725 companies lost to Datadog likely hit New Relic's data pricing ceiling and explored alternatives. Shutterstock's case study confirms this tension. They cut logging spend by 60% after consolidating onto New Relic, but only because they invested in structured data pipelines and per-team cost dashboards. The second complaint, setup complexity (50 mentions), contradicts the ease-of-use praise. Skyscanner's experience illustrates why: they needed 10 dedicated engineers to maintain their pre-New Relic monitoring stack, then freed all of them after migrating 12 tools onto the platform. The upfront consolidation work is real, but the long-term payoff shows up in both our detection data and vendor case studies.
Sales Signal: For prospects citing price concerns, lead with the free tier (100 GB/month) and consumption model. For those citing setup complexity, offer professional services or pre-built quickstart integrations (770+ available).
7. Key takeaways
1. Market position: New Relic has the largest APM detection footprint at 167,893 domains, nearly 8x Datadog. It's the default enterprise observability choice.
2. Growth phase: Still expanding, with 40% active domain growth in 2024 alone. Not maturing yet.
3. Core archetype: Bimodal, split between micro-businesses on the free tier and Fortune 500 enterprises on paid plans.
4. Competitive moat: Consumption pricing, 770+ integrations, and the free tier create a powerful land-and-expand motion that host-based competitors (Dynatrace, AppDynamics) can't match. Vendor case studies confirm the ROI: AB InBev got 80% MTTR reduction, Shutterstock cut logging spend 60%, Skyscanner replaced 12 tools.
5. Key vulnerability: Datadog is winning cloud-native workloads. The 0.68:1 migration ratio against Datadog is the most concerning competitive signal.
8. Sales applications
Outreach template: "Hi [Name], I noticed [Company] is running New Relic alongside [Datadog/Dynatrace] based on our detection data at TechnologyChecker.io. Companies in [Industry] that consolidated to a single observability platform saved an average of 30-40% on monitoring costs. Worth a quick chat about what consolidation could look like for your team?"
Targeting strategy: On TechnologyChecker.io, filter for companies running New Relic + Datadog simultaneously (dual-stack). These are prime consolidation targets. Focus on the Retail (8.77%) and Financial Services (2.14%) verticals where compliance and uptime SLAs make consolidation especially valuable.
Competitive angle: Target the 1,866 companies that recently migrated from Dynatrace to New Relic. They've already proven willingness to switch. Reach out within 6 months of migration when they're still evaluating the new platform.
For the full dataset of 167,893 domains and 72,674 enriched companies, visit TechnologyChecker.io.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who uses New Relic?
New Relic is used by 167,893 companies worldwide, including Deloitte, IBM, Capgemini, based on our analysis of 50M+ crawled domains at TechnologyChecker.io. It's particularly popular in the Retail industry (8.77% of customers).
How many customers does New Relic have?
New Relic has 167,893 active customers detected through our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains. We enriched 72,674 of these with LinkedIn company data on TechnologyChecker.io to generate detailed insights. An additional 1,742,207 sites that previously used New Relic are also tracked.
What is New Relic's market share?
New Relic holds 52.47% of the Real User Monitoring (RUM) market, ranking #1 in the category — based on our analysis of 50M+ domains and 40K+ technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.
What are the best alternatives to New Relic?
The top alternatives to New Relic include Datadog (7.08% market share), Dynatrace (4.55% market share), Grafana (2.88% market share), AppDynamics (0.56% market share) — based on our market share data across 50M+ crawled domains.
Which countries use New Relic the most?
United States leads with 38,470 New Relic customers, followed by Brazil (5,916), United Kingdom (4,412), Canada (2,357), Australia (2,130), based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.
What size companies use New Relic?
The most common company size is 1-10 employees, representing 66.7% of New Relic customers, based on our analysis of 72,674 enriched companies. This is followed by 11-50 employees (15%) and 51-200 employees (8.4%).
How old are companies that use New Relic?
The majority of New Relic customers were founded in the 2010s (36.09%), followed by the 2000s (17.77%), based on our analysis of 72,674 enriched companies. This suggests New Relic is most popular among relatively young companies.
What is the ideal customer profile for New Relic?
The ideal New Relic customer is: Company Size: 1-10 employees, Location: US, Brazil, or UK, City: New York, London, Sao Paulo, Founded: 2010-2019, Company Age: ~7-16 years old — based on our analysis of 72,674 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.
Does Google use New Relic?
Google doesn't appear in our New Relic detection data, though New Relic is listed as a Google Cloud Ready partner. Our dataset tracks 167,893 active domains running New Relic, and Google's primary domains aren't among them. Google builds its own internal observability tools, so it doesn't rely on third-party monitoring for core infrastructure.
Who does New Relic compete with?
New Relic's primary competitors are Datadog (22,671 detected domains), Dynatrace (14,577 domains), Grafana (9,227 domains), and AppDynamics (1,788 domains) per our detection data at TechnologyChecker.io. Datadog is the closest full-stack rival, while Dynatrace targets large enterprises and Grafana appeals to teams that prefer open-source observability stacks.
Is New Relic better than Grafana?
It depends on your team's priorities. New Relic offers a managed SaaS platform with 770+ integrations and built-in AI analysis, ideal for teams that don't want to self-host. Grafana gives you more control over dashboards and visualization, but requires self-hosting or Grafana Cloud. Our data shows New Relic has 18x the detection footprint of Grafana (167,893 vs 9,227 domains).
Is New Relic free to use?
Yes. New Relic offers a permanent free tier with 100 GB of data ingest per month, 1 full platform user, and unlimited basic users. No credit card is required. The Pro tier costs $0.40/GB beyond the free 100 GB and $349 per full platform user annually. This consumption model replaced the legacy host-based pricing in 2020.
Did New Relic get bought out?
Yes. In November 2023, private equity firms Francisco Partners and TPG acquired New Relic for approximately $6.5 billion. The company was delisted from the NYSE after the acquisition closed. New Relic was originally founded in 2008 by Lew Cirne and went public in 2014 before going private again.
What is the difference between New Relic and Datadog?
New Relic uses consumption-based pricing (pay per GB ingested), while Datadog charges by host plus usage tiers. New Relic has a larger detection footprint (167,893 vs 22,671 domains in our data) and a more generous free tier. Datadog excels in granular custom metrics and cloud-native integrations. Our migration data shows a 0.68:1 ratio favoring Datadog in recent switches.
Is New Relic good for small businesses?
Yes. Despite its enterprise reputation, 66.7% of New Relic customers have 1-10 employees per our analysis of 72,674 enriched companies on TechnologyChecker.io. The free tier (100 GB/month, no credit card) makes it accessible for startups. Small teams can monitor applications, infrastructure, and browser performance without any upfront cost.
What industries use New Relic the most?
Retail leads at 8.77%, followed by Real Estate (4.91%) and Medical Practices (4.35%) per our enriched company data. Software Development (3.68%) and IT Consulting (2.99%) are also significant. No single industry exceeds 9%, which makes New Relic one of the most horizontal monitoring platforms in our dataset.
How does New Relic pricing compare to Dynatrace?
New Relic charges $0.40/GB of data ingested plus $349/user annually, with a free tier of 100 GB/month. Dynatrace uses a host-based and DDU (Davis Data Unit) pricing model that starts around $0.04/DDU. For data-heavy environments, New Relic's model can be more predictable. Our migration data shows 1,866 companies switched from Dynatrace to New Relic.
What programming languages does New Relic support?
New Relic supports 11 programming languages for APM instrumentation: Java, .NET, Node.js, Python, Ruby, Go, PHP, C SDK, Elixir, Rust, and browser JavaScript. The platform also offers 770+ integrations for infrastructure, Kubernetes, Docker, serverless, and cloud services across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
Is New Relic an APM tool or an observability platform?
Both. New Relic started as an APM tool in 2008 and evolved into a full observability platform. It now includes APM, infrastructure monitoring, log management, real user monitoring (RUM), synthetic monitoring, security vulnerability management, and AI monitoring. The unified platform approach is a key differentiator from point solutions like Sentry or Pingdom.
Can New Relic monitor Kubernetes?
Yes. New Relic acquired Pixie in 2021 specifically for instant Kubernetes observability. The platform includes a Kubernetes cluster explorer, pod-level metrics, container monitoring, and automated eBPF-based instrumentation through Pixie. This is one of its strongest enterprise use cases, per G2 reviews and our detection data.
Based on 72,674 company data
These insights include all TechnologCchecker.io detections of New Relic (free & paid plans).