Companies Using Froala Editor

We detect Froala Editor on 57,223 domains, including Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, IBM, Lockheed Martin. A detection means the technology is present on that domain, which for large organisations is often a single storefront or subdomain rather than a company-wide deployment. Among domains we matched to a company with a resolved industry, the most common is Government Administration (8.22%).

We detect 57,223 domains running Froala Editor across our monthly crawl of live business domains. Company data could be matched for 31,819 of them (55.6%), and every company-size, industry and country breakdown on this page describes that matched subset rather than the full detected base. A further 5,521 domains carried a Froala Editor detection previously and no longer do.

Froala Editor holds 30.25% of the WYSIWYG Editors category, ranking #1. This is a share of the domains we detect running a platform in this category — not a share of all websites, and not a share of spending — so it is not directly comparable to figures published on other denominators.

The top alternatives to Froala Editor include TinyMCE (27.67% market share), CKEditor (20.73% market share), Quill (14.44% market share), Ace (3.33% market share) — measured as a share of the domains we detect running a platform in this category.

United States leads with 16,476 matched Froala Editor domains, followed by United Kingdom (1,611), Belgium (1,338), Germany (1,164), South Korea (1,069). These are counts within the 31,819 domains we could match to a company record, not the full detected base.

The most common company size is 1-10 employees, representing 59.06% of the Froala Editor domains we could match to a company record and size — a subset of 31,819 matched companies, not of all 57,223 detected domains. This is followed by 11-50 employees (22.48%) and 51-200 employees (10.64%).

Among the Froala Editor domains we could match to a company with a known founding date, most were founded in the 2020s (16.27%), followed by the 2010s (30.39%). That matched subset is drawn from 31,819 companies and is not representative of all 57,223 detected domains. This suggests Froala Editor is most popular among relatively young companies.

The ideal Froala Editor customer is: Company Size: 1-10 employees, Industry: Government, hospitality and religious organisations, Location: United States, Founded: 2010-2019, Stack: jQuery-era application — based on our analysis of 31,819 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.

We detect Froala on 57,223 active domains as of our August 2026 crawl, first in the WYSIWYG Editors category at 30.25%. One caveat matters: Froala is matched on the fr-view and fr-box classes it wraps around content it produced, and those classes stay in published HTML long after anyone opens the editor. The count includes pages that were authored in Froala, not only sites where it currently runs.

No. Froala is a commercial JavaScript editor, now owned by Idera, with a paid licence for production use and a free trial that shows a watermark. That makes its footprint here interesting: 59.06% of the companies we can size have 10 employees or fewer, which is not who normally buys a per-seat component licence. In most cases the licence belongs to the platform vendor, and the small companies we detect are that vendor's customers.

By our counts Froala leads at 57,223 domains, TinyMCE has 52,357 and CKEditor 39,226. But they are not measured the same way. Froala is matched on the classes it leaves in published content; TinyMCE and CKEditor are matched on the editor script actually loading. Since an editor normally runs behind a login a crawler never reaches, the script-based counts are floors and the class-based one is not. Treat the three as close rather than ranked.

Because their newsroom vendor does. 37 of the 50 largest companies we detect on Froala matched on a news, newsroom, press or media subdomain: newsroom.ibm.com, news.cognizant.com, news.lockheedmartin.com, mediacenter.adp.com. Looking at all 105 Froala domains on a news-style subdomain, 95.2% run Cloudflare, 89.5% run Google Cloud CDN, 69.5% run Matomo and 52.4% run OneTrust. A stack that uniform is one hosted platform, not a hundred independent choices.

The same reason. The Government Administration segment is 2,157 domains, about 3.8% of Froala's base, and 93.3% of them run Azure Monitor, 93.2% Alpine.js and 96.8% jQuery UI. That is a single public-sector website platform with Froala embedded. Restaurants (5.55%) and Religious Institutions (3.68%) are website-builder verticals with the same shape.

59.06% have 10 employees or fewer and 22.48% have 11 to 50, so over 80% are under 50 people. Larger names appear through a secondary property rather than the whole company, usually a newsroom on a subdomain.

The United States dominates with 16,476 of the companies we can place, an order of magnitude ahead of the United Kingdom (1,611). Belgium (1,338) and South Korea (1,069) rank higher than their share of the web would suggest, which points at regional platform vendors rather than national preference.

Almost never. Of the 4,984 domains that dropped Froala entirely, only 16 now run another editor we track (7 TinyMCE, 5 CKEditor, 2 Quill, 2 Ace). That is 0.3%. An editor is wired into an application's save path and its stored markup, so it is a migration project rather than a swap. Most of that churn is sites being rebuilt or retired.

Two signals: the presence of .fr-view, .fr-box or .fr-popup elements (version 2 and later) or .froala-box (version 1), and a FroalaEditor.VERSION JavaScript global. The first is the one that matters, because it matches the markup Froala wraps around the content it produced, so it fires on published pages and not only where the editor loads.

A jQuery-era one. jQuery is on 88.71%, jQuery UI on 44.62%, jQuery Migrate on 29.79%, Modernizr on 29.54% and Bootstrap on 48.48%. For comparison, Quill sits at 74.06% jQuery with Tailwind CSS on 28.9%. These are different generations of front end.