Companies Using Vite

We detect Vite on 89,486 domains, including Microsoft, Apple, Samsung. A detection means the technology is present on that domain, which for large organisations is often a single storefront or subdomain rather than a company-wide deployment. Among domains we matched to a company with a resolved industry, the most common is IT Services and IT Consulting (7.86%).

We detect 89,486 domains running Vite across our monthly crawl of live business domains. Company data could be matched for 18,559 of them (20.7%), and every company-size, industry and country breakdown on this page describes that matched subset rather than the full detected base. A further 13,243 domains carried a Vite detection previously and no longer do.

Vite holds 5.38% of the Developer Tooling category, ranking #4. This is a share of the domains we detect running a platform in this category — not a share of all websites, and not a share of spending — so it is not directly comparable to figures published on other denominators.

The top alternatives to Vite include Webpack (40.64% market share), Babel (20.99% market share), Turbopack (14.5% market share), DreamWeaver (4.52% market share) — measured as a share of the domains we detect running a platform in this category.

United States leads with 3,898 matched Vite domains, followed by India (2,086), Brazil (1,317), China (1,266), United Kingdom (860). These are counts within the 18,559 domains we could match to a company record, not the full detected base.

The most common company size is 1-10 employees, representing 63.95% of the Vite domains we could match to a company record and size — a subset of 18,559 matched companies, not of all 89,486 detected domains. This is followed by 11-50 employees (21.91%) and 51-200 employees (7.92%).

Among the Vite domains we could match to a company with a known founding date, the largest group was founded in the 2010s (40.38%), followed by the 2020s (38.74%). That matched subset is drawn from 18,559 companies and is not representative of all 89,486 detected domains. This suggests Vite is most popular among relatively young companies.

The ideal Vite customer is: Company Size: 1-10 employees, Location: US, UK, or Australia, City: New York, London, Sydney, Toronto, Founded: 2010-2019, Company Age: ~5-15 years old — based on our analysis of 18,559 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.

In npm downloads, yes: Vite passed Webpack in weekly downloads in July 2025 and now exceeds 84 million. In detected websites, not yet. Our August 2026 crawl finds Webpack on 676,360 domains against Vite's 89,486, though much of Webpack's footprint is accumulated output from older builds. Notably, our switching tests found no corridor between them: among domains that dropped Vite only 0.91% run Webpack, against 2.15% of those that kept it. Bundlers are chosen at project scaffolding and almost never swapped in a live codebase, so the transition happens between projects rather than within them.

Yes. Vite is fully open-source under the MIT license. VoidZero Inc., the company behind Vite, raised $17.1M ($4.6M seed + $12.5M Series A from Accel and Peak XV Partners) to fund full-time development (source: voidzero.dev). There are no paid tiers or premium features. The commercial offering is Vite+, a unified toolchain announced in March 2026.

Vite serves code via native ES modules during development, so it doesn't bundle your entire app before starting the dev server. Webpack bundles everything upfront, which gets slower as projects grow. Since Vite 8 (March 2026), production builds use Rolldown, a Rust-based bundler delivering 10-30x faster builds. Linear cut builds from 46s to 6s (source: vite.dev/blog/announcing-vite8).

Yes, and it is the officially recommended path since React deprecated Create React App in February 2025. Our detection data shows React Router on 39.44% of Vite domains. React itself registers only 4.85%, but that is a detection limitation rather than a real absence, since React Router cannot run without React and modern production builds strip the runtime signatures we look for. Read together, the React and Vue ecosystems are close to evenly split across Vite's base.

Vue, React, Svelte, SolidJS, and Qwik all support Vite natively. Meta-frameworks built on Vite include Nuxt (Vue), SvelteKit (Svelte), Astro, React Router (formerly Remix), and Shopify Hydrogen (React). The Vite 8 announcement notes that SvelteKit, React Router, Storybook, Astro, and Nuxt all tested Rolldown integration early (source: vite.dev/blog/announcing-vite8).

Yes. Since Vite 8, production builds use Rolldown, a Rust-based bundler that replaced Rollup and esbuild. Our data shows 89,486 active production websites running Vite, including Samsung, Nike, and JP Morgan Chase. Real-world results: Linear cut builds from 46s to 6s, Ramp saw a 57% reduction, and Beehiiv got 64% faster (source: vite.dev/blog/announcing-vite8).

Among the 18,559 Vite domains we can match to a company, IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 7.86%, followed by Software Development (7.29%) and Technology, Information and Internet (5.64%). Those three total 20.8%, roughly double their share on other tools we track, which is what a build tool's profile should look like. Note that only 20.7% of Vite domains match a company at all, so this describes the identifiable minority.

Yes. Vite works as a standalone build tool for vanilla JavaScript, TypeScript, or any UI library. Run 'npm create vite@latest' and choose the vanilla template. The React docs specifically note you can "roll your own custom setup with React using Vite" without a framework (source: react.dev/blog/2025/02/14/sunsetting-create-react-app).

Turbopack is Next.js's bundler, written in Rust and tightly coupled to that framework; Vite is framework-agnostic and used by Vue, Svelte, Astro, SolidJS and Remix among others. By footprint Turbopack is detected on 241,375 domains against Vite's 89,486, largely reflecting Next.js's reach. Our switching data shows domains leaving Vite adopt Turbopack at 3.6 times the base rate, but 66% of them still run both, which indicates evaluation rather than replacement.

Vite is a build tool; Next.js is a full React framework. They solve different problems. Next.js includes routing, SSR, API routes, and deployment. Vite handles dev serving and bundling. As Evan You put it in a Stack Overflow blog interview, "Vite is like the United Nations of JavaScript" because it supports every major framework (source: stackoverflow.blog).

They do not, and the assumption is worth correcting. Shopify Hydrogen ships Vite as its default bundler, which invites the inference that commerce dominates Vite adoption. Against our full live set, Shopify co-occurs on just 1.6% of Vite domains and retail accounts for 3.59% of matched companies. The Hydrogen integration is real and documented, but Hydrogen storefronts are a small fraction of what Vite builds.

Vite's analytics distribution is unlike anything else in our index: Baidu Analytics appears on 20.81% of Vite domains, ahead of Google Analytics at 13.53%. Cloudflare Browser Insights follows at 14.9%. The Baidu weighting reflects a substantial Chinese user base, which Vite appears to have inherited from Vue, created by the same author and disproportionately popular in China. Vue.js co-occurs on 46.9% of Vite domains.

Vite+ is a unified JavaScript toolchain announced by VoidZero in March 2026. It bundles Vite (build tool), Vitest (testing), Oxlint (linting), and Rolldown (bundler) into a single package. Vite+ is open-source but aims to generate revenue for VoidZero through enterprise support (source: voidzero.dev/posts/announcing-vite-plus-alpha). Standard Vite remains free and independent.