Companies Using Workable
Our database tracks 1,466 companies using Workable, from solo startups to global enterprises like LinkedIn, Virgin, and Safran Group. Below you'll find a verified list of companies using Workable with enriched company data, industry breakdowns, and geographic distribution.
Workable holds a 4.69% share of the HR & recruitment software market, ranking #5 in the category. The brands that use Workable span software development, sports organizations, and technology sectors, with websites using Workable concentrated in the United States and United Kingdom. Data updated monthly at TechnologyChecker.io across 50M+ tracked domains.
Published Mar 12, 2026 · Updated Mar 12, 2026 · Data analysed on March 12, 2026.
Workable Usage Statistics
What does Workable's adoption trend look like? Workable has grown from a single domain in 2009 to 1,495 active domains by late 2024. The platform experienced accelerated adoption during 2020–2024, coinciding with the post-pandemic shift to remote hiring and digital HR infrastructure. Growth has moderated since peaking in late 2024, with recent months showing slight consolidation as the market matures.
List of Companies Using Workable
Download all 1,495 Workable customers with full company data, or create a signal to track when companies start or stop using Workable.
| Company | Detection URL | Domain | Country | Industry | Employees | Type | Founded | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| safran-group.com/* | safran-group.com | France | Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 2005 | https://linkedin.com/company/safran | |
| virgin.com | virgin.com | United Kingdom | Venture Capital and Private Equity Principals | 10001+ | Privately Held | 1970 | https://linkedin.com/company/virgin | |
| linkedin.com | linkedin.com | United States | Software Development | 10001+ | Public Company | 2003 | https://linkedin.com/company/linkedin | |
| careers.accessbankplc.com | accessbankplc.com | Nigeria | Banking | 10001+ | Public Company | 1989 | https://linkedin.com/company/access-bank-plc | |
| indeed.com | indeed.com | United States | Technology, Information and Internet | 10001+ | Privately Held | 2004 | https://linkedin.com/company/indeed-com | |
| araic.asus.com | asus.com | Taiwan | Computer Hardware Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1989 | https://linkedin.com/company/asus | |
| hcaptcha-api.ecosec.on.epicgames.com | epicgames.com | United States | Computer Games | 1001-5000 | Privately Held | 1991 | https://linkedin.com/company/epic-games | |
| employer-connect.latrobe.edu.au | latrobe.edu.au | Australia | Higher Education | 1001-5000 | Educational | 1967 | https://linkedin.com/company/la-trobe-university | |
| mihomes.com | mihomes.com | United States | Real Estate | 1001-5000 | Public Company | 1976 | https://linkedin.com/company/mihomes | |
| careers.flutterinternational.com | flutterinternational.com | Ireland | Entertainment Providers | 5001-10000 | Public Company | — | https://linkedin.com/company/flutter-international |
Show 22 more Workable using companies as demo data
| Company | Detection URL | Country | Industry | Employees | Type | Founded | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vivoenergy.com/* | vivoenergy.com | United Kingdom | Oil and Gas | 1001-5000 | Privately Held | 2011 | https://linkedin.com/company/vivoenergy | |
| biffa.co.uk | biffa.co.uk | United Kingdom | Environmental Services | 5001-10000 | Public Company | 1912 | https://linkedin.com/company/biffa | |
| loggi.com | loggi.com | Brazil | Freight and Package Transportation | 1001-5000 | Privately Held | 2013 | https://linkedin.com/company/loggi | |
| oilandgasjobsearch.com/* | oilandgasjobsearch.com | United Kingdom | Oil and Gas | 201-500 | Privately Held | 2000 | https://linkedin.com/company/oilandgasjobsearch | |
| mytutor-careers.mytutor.co.uk | mytutor.co.uk | United Kingdom | E-Learning Providers | 51-200 | Privately Held | 2013 | https://linkedin.com/company/mytutor.co.uk | |
| futureplc.com | futureplc.com | United Kingdom | Media Production | 1001-5000 | Public Company | 1985 | https://linkedin.com/company/future-publishing | |
| alumni.ju.edu.jo | ju.edu.jo | Jordan | Higher Education | 1-10 | Educational | 1962 | https://linkedin.com/company/university-of-jordan | |
| nextgen.teamwass.com | teamwass.com | United States | Entertainment Providers | 1001-5000 | Privately Held | 2002 | https://linkedin.com/company/wasserman | |
| careers.frontiersin.org | frontiersin.org | Switzerland | Research Services | 1001-5000 | Privately Held | 2007 | https://linkedin.com/company/frontiers | |
| jobs.techstars.com/* | techstars.com | United States | Venture Capital and Private Equity Principals | 201-500 | Privately Held | 2006 | https://linkedin.com/company/techstars | |
| schoolinks.com | schoolinks.com | United States | Education Management | 51-200 | Privately Held | 2014 | https://linkedin.com/company/schoolinks | |
| growandbeyond.amartha.com/* | amartha.com | Indonesia | Financial Services | 5001-10000 | Privately Held | 2010 | https://linkedin.com/company/amartha | |
| careers.sdfgroup.com/* | sdfgroup.com | Italy | Machinery Manufacturing | 1001-5000 | Privately Held | 1927 | https://linkedin.com/company/sdfgroup | |
| barkibu.factorialhr.com | factorialhr.com | Spain | Software Development | 501-1000 | Privately Held | 2016 | https://linkedin.com/company/factorialhr | |
| middlebury.edu | middlebury.edu | United States | Higher Education | 1001-5000 | Educational | 1800 | https://linkedin.com/company/middlebury-college | |
| bitget.com | bitget.com | Seychelles | Financial Services | 1001-5000 | Privately Held | 2018 | https://linkedin.com/company/bitget-global | |
| devsinc.com | devsinc.com | United States | IT Services and IT Consulting | 1001-5000 | Privately Held | — | https://linkedin.com/company/developers-inc | |
| careers.usta.com | usta.com | United States | Spectator Sports | 201-500 | Nonprofit | 1881 | https://linkedin.com/company/usta | |
| jobs.adia.ae | adia.ae | United Arab Emirates | Financial Services | 1001-5000 | Government Agency | 1976 | https://linkedin.com/company/adia | |
| psychologytoday.com/* | psychologytoday.com | United States | Internet Publishing | 11-50 | Privately Held | 1967 | https://linkedin.com/company/psychology-today | |
| datamark.net | datamark.net | United States | Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting | 1001-5000 | Privately Held | 1989 | https://linkedin.com/company/datamark-inc- | |
| indonesia.endeavor.org | endeavor.org | United States | Non-profit Organizations | 501-1000 | Nonprofit | 1997 | https://linkedin.com/company/endeavorglobal |
There are 1,495 companies and websites using Workable, sign up to download the entire Workable dataset.
Here are some of the most recognizable companies using Workable and brands using Workable in 2026:
- LinkedIn – Technology giant using Workable for recruitment operations
- Virgin – Global conglomerate managing hiring with Workable across ventures
- Safran Group – Aviation and aerospace manufacturer using Workable for talent acquisition
- Epic Games – Computer games company hiring on Workable
- Indeed, Inc. – Job search platform using Workable for internal recruiting
- ASUS – Computer hardware manufacturer managing applicants with Workable
- Flutter International – Entertainment provider using Workable for global hiring, as featured in Workable's case studies
- Biffa – Environmental services company on Workable
- TechStars – Venture capital firm hiring portfolio talent via Workable
- Abu Dhabi Investment Authority – Government agency using Workable for financial services recruitment
Which Countries Use Workable the Most?
Which countries use Workable the most? The United States leads with 39.1% of all customers, but Workable's global footprint extends across 40+ countries. The United Kingdom (29.4%) and Canada (4.3%) round out the top three. Together, English-speaking countries account for over 72% of the user base, based on our enriched company data.
Workable Market Share Among HR & Recruitment
What is Workable's market share? Workable holds a 4.69% share of the HR & recruitment software market, ranking #5 in the category. A mid-tier player behind WP Job Openings (20.7%), Teamtailor (8.29%), and ADP Workforce Now (6.52%), based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.
Top Competitors by Market Share
Workable Customers by Company Size & Age
Is Workable only for small businesses? Yes, small businesses dominate the platform. With 67.2% of Workable customers having 50 or fewer employees based on our analysis of 1,563 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io, the platform is the go-to choice for small-to-medium teams. However, enterprise clients including LinkedIn, Virgin, and Safran Group prove Workable scales beyond micro-businesses.
Company Size Distribution
Company Age (Founded Decade)
What Industries Use Workable the Most?
Software Development is the dominant industry at 10.56%, followed by Spectator Sports (9.83%) and Technology, Information and Internet (6.28%). The long tail is significant, no single industry exceeds 11%, which positions Workable as a genuinely horizontal recruitment platform serving diverse verticals, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.
Software development companies using Workable represent the platform's largest vertical at 10.56%. Spectator sports organizations on Workable account for 9.83%, with teams like USTA demonstrating the platform's appeal in managing seasonal hiring. Technology companies using Workable like LinkedIn and Epic Games highlight the platform's strength in fast-growth tech recruiting, based on our enriched company data.
Workable Alternatives & Competitors
How does Workable compare to competitors? Workable's competitive field places it as a mid-tier player in a fragmented HR & recruitment software market, based on our market share data across 50M+ crawled domains. WP Job Openings (20.7%) leads the category with a WordPress-native approach. Teamtailor (8.29%) has gained traction in Europe with employer branding focus. ADP Workforce Now (6.52%) offers broader HR suite integration, while Rippling (5.59%) positions as an all-in-one HR platform.
| Technology | Domains | Market Share |
|---|---|---|
 | 6,474 | 20.7% |
 | 2,592 | 8.29% |
 | 2,039 | 6.52% |
 | 1,748 | 5.59% |
 | 1,276 | 4.08% |
Workable Customer Migration
Where are Workable customers migrating? Based on 1,563 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io, Workable's migration data shows a net loss pattern. The platform has lost 146 companies to Greenhouse (a 2.0:1 loss ratio) and 120 to Lever (a 1.7:1 loss ratio), indicating competitive pressure from specialized recruitment platforms. Workable gained 72 companies from Greenhouse and 69 from Lever, suggesting two-way migration flows rather than one-directional churn.
| Competitor | Gained | Lost | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
 | +72 | -146 | -74 |
 | +69 | -120 | -51 |
| +13 | -47 | -34 |
| +34 | -25 | +9 |
| +7 | -40 | -33 |
Tech Stack of Workable-Powered Websites
What technologies do Workable companies use alongside it? Based on 1,563 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io, Workable customers most commonly pair the platform with Google Analytics (81.5%) for recruitment funnel tracking. Google Tag Manager (83.4%) and React (60.1%) show Workable users run modern, analytics-driven hiring operations. High adoption of LinkedIn (68.3%), Slack (39.4%), and Facebook (76.8%) reveals Workable customers maintain multi-channel sourcing and collaborative hiring workflows.
Web Analytics
Marketing & Advertising
JavaScript Frameworks
CDN & Hosting
Communication & Collaboration
Workable Customer Reviews with Pros and Cons
Based on aggregated G2 reviews (875 total mentions), Workable scores highest for ease of use. The most common criticism relates to limited customization.
Generated from real user reviews on G2
- Users commend the ease of use of Workable, appreciating its intuitive interface and sped up recruiting process.(200 reviews)
- Users value the integrated recruiting process of Workable, enhancing organization and efficiency in hiring and tracking candidates.(113 reviews)
- Users value the intuitive design of Workable, which simplifies collaboration and enhances the hiring process for all team members.(97 reviews)
- Users appreciate the intuitive and collaborative candidate management features of Workable, speeding up recruitment processes effectively.(94 reviews)
- Users appreciate the intuitive user interface of Workable, making recruitment easy and efficient for all skill levels.(91 reviews)
- Users find limited customization in reporting and screening options, hindering a tailored experience with Workable.(68 reviews)
- Users find missing features in Workable, particularly in screening, tracking candidates, and reporting capabilities.(61 reviews)
- Users find the candidate management tools lacking, citing issues with reporting, search filters, and integration with LinkedIn Recruiter.(59 reviews)
- Users feel the limited features of Workable hinder customization and flexibility, impacting overall recruitment functionality.(50 reviews)
- Users find the limited editing options and rigid reporting functionalities hinder their recruitment process on Workable.(42 reviews)
Expert Analysis: Workable Growth Trends & Key Signals for Sales Teams in 2026
The data on Workable is in. Let's walk through what our analysis of its adoption base reveals.
1. Growth Trajectory
Workable launched in 2009 and operated in stealth mode for nearly a decade, detection data shows just 1-2 domains through 2018. The platform saw its first acceleration in 2019–2020, growing from 72 to 145 active domains, then entered hypergrowth from 2020–2024, scaling from 145 to 1,495 domains. That's a 10.3x increase in 4 years, driven by pandemic-era remote hiring adoption. However, growth has plateaued since late 2024, with recent months showing slight contraction (1,495 in Dec 2024 to 1,296 in July 2025). This pattern mirrors broader SaaS consolidation trends, companies are scrutinizing HR tool sprawl and consolidating vendors. Workable sits at 4.69% market share, ranking #5 in a fragmented category where the leader (WP Job Openings) holds just 20.7%. There's no runaway dominant player, which means competitive positioning matters more than sheer scale.
Sales Signal: The flattening growth curve suggests Workable is entering market maturity. Sales teams should focus on expansion revenue from existing customers (upselling recruitment marketing add-ons, multi-seat enterprise plans) rather than chasing greenfield net-new accounts. Companies that adopted Workable during the 2020-2022 growth phase are now hitting renewal cycles. This is when churn risk is highest and retention tools (onboarding audits, integration health checks) deliver the most value.
2. Customer Profile
Workable's customer base skews heavily small business: 67.2% have 50 or fewer employees (41.2% are 1-10, 26.0% are 11-50). Only 0.6% have 10,001+ employees. This isn't an enterprise platform. It's a small-team recruitment tool. The company age distribution reinforces this: 45.64% were founded in the 2010s, with another 17.42% in the 2020s. That's 63.1% founded post-2010. These are digital-native startups and scale-ups, not legacy enterprises retrofitting HR systems. The presence of LinkedIn, Virgin, and Safran Group (all 10,001+ employees) in the top companies list is notable but non-representative. These are outlier deployments, likely limited to specific business units or regional offices. The 68.52% privately held / 12.81% nonprofit split (from combined_analysis.json) shows Workable serves founder-led companies and mission-driven orgs, not corporate HR departments.
Sales Signal: Workable customers are small, fast-moving teams that value speed over customization. They don't want a 6-month implementation, they need to post a job tomorrow. Tools that accelerate time-to-hire (one-click job board syndication, AI resume screening, mobile-first candidate experiences) will resonate more than enterprise features (HRIS integrations, compliance reporting, org chart builders). The nonprofit concentration (12.81%) is an underserved niche, purpose-driven orgs often lack recruiting budgets but desperately need talent. Products that offer nonprofit pricing or volunteer/intern management features have whitespace opportunity here.
3. Industry & Geographic Concentration
Workable's industry distribution is remarkably flat: Software Development leads at just 10.56%, followed by Spectator Sports (9.83%) and Technology (6.28%). No single industry exceeds 11%, which positions Workable as genuinely horizontal. It's not a vertical-specific tool. The top 10 industries account for only ~51% of customers, meaning the long tail is massive. Geographically, Workable is overwhelmingly English-speaking: US (39.1%) + UK (29.4%) + Canada (4.3%) + Australia (1.8%) = 74.6%. Greece ranks 4th at 2.4%, which likely reflects Workable's Greek founders (Nikos Moraitakis, based in Athens). The UK's 29.4% share is unusually high for a US-founded SaaS product, suggesting strong product-market fit in the UK SMB hiring market.
Sales Signal: The horizontal nature means there's no single vertical to prioritize, but the sports concentration (9.83% Spectator Sports + 2.41% Sports Teams/Clubs = 12.24%) is an untapped angle. Sports orgs have unique hiring patterns: seasonal recruiting, high-volume part-time roles, compliance-heavy background checks. A productized "sports team hiring playbook" could capture this segment. Geographically, the underrepresented regions are EU (Germany 1.4%, France 1.0%, Netherlands 0.6%) and Asia-Pacific (Singapore 1.0%, UAE 0.8%). Localized tools, GDPR-compliant data handling for EU, multi-language support for APAC, represent greenfield expansion opportunities.
4. Migration Patterns
Workable's migration data shows a net loss position: the platform lost 146 companies to Greenhouse (vs. 72 gained = 2.0:1 loss ratio) and 120 to Lever (vs. 69 gained = 1.7:1 loss ratio). The largest inbound migration source is also Greenhouse (72 companies switched TO Workable), which suggests two-way migration flows rather than one-directional churn. Companies move between Workable, Greenhouse, and Lever based on evolving needs, not platform failures. The Rippling migration data is notable: 47 companies switched from Workable to Rippling (vs. 13 the other direction = 3.6:1 loss ratio). Rippling positions as an all-in-one HR platform (payroll + benefits + HRIS + ATS), which suggests Workable customers are consolidating vendors. The last_1y column shows Rippling migration is 100% recent (all 47 switches happened in the last year), confirming this is an active competitive threat.
Sales Signal: The two-sided migration flows create two distinct sales opportunities: (1) Migration services, companies moving from Greenhouse/Lever to Workable (or vice versa) need data migration, API integrations, and change management support. Tools that automate candidate record transfers, job posting syncs, and integration setups reduce switching friction. (2) Retention tools, the Rippling threat suggests Workable customers are vulnerable to all-in-one HR platform consolidation pitches. Products that integrate Workable with payroll/benefits systems (BambooHR, Gusto, Justworks) reduce the need to switch to Rippling. Sales teams should identify Workable customers who recently added payroll/HRIS systems. They're at risk of consolidating to a unified platform.
5. Technology stack
Workable customers run modern, analytics-heavy tech stacks: Google Analytics (81.5%), Google Tag Manager (83.4%), and Google Analytics 4 (67.6%) show these companies track recruitment funnels obsessively. High React (60.1%) and Next.js (40.6%) adoption indicates technically sophisticated teams, these aren't companies using WordPress job boards. The LinkedIn (68.3%) and Slack (39.4%) overlap is strategically important: LinkedIn is the primary sourcing channel for knowledge workers, and Slack is where hiring teams collaborate. Tools that integrate Workable with LinkedIn Recruiter (candidate syncing) and Slack (interview scheduling bots, candidate updates) align with existing workflows. The Facebook Pixel (23.4%) and DoubleClick (80.9%) overlap suggests Workable customers run paid recruitment marketing campaigns. They're advertising job openings, not just posting organically.
Sales Signal: The tech stack reveals underrepresented categories where Workable customers have gaps: (1) Video interviewing, no obvious tool appears in the top 100 (Zoom would show up if widely used for structured interviews). Products like Spark Hire, HireVue, or async video screening tools could capture this whitespace. (2) Candidate assessment platforms, no Codility, HackerRank, or TestGorilla in the stack. Technical hiring teams (60% use React, suggesting eng-heavy orgs) need pre-employment testing. (3) Employee referral platforms, no Jobvite Refer, RolePoint, or Drafted detected. Referral programs are the highest-quality sourcing channel but require dedicated tooling. These gaps represent upsell opportunities for complementary HR tech vendors.
6. Key Takeaways
Workable is a small-business recruitment platform in market maturity phase, with 67% of customers under 50 employees, 74% in English-speaking markets, and 63% founded post-2010. The platform experienced hypergrowth (2020-2024) but has since plateaued, with competitive pressure from Greenhouse/Lever (specialist ATS platforms) and Rippling (all-in-one HR). The customer base is horizontally distributed (no vertical exceeds 11%) but shows concentrations in software development (10.6%) and sports organizations (12.2%). Migration data shows two-way flows between specialist ATS platforms, but a one-directional loss pattern to all-in-one HR suites. The tech stack reveals modern, analytics-driven hiring operations with gaps in video interviewing, candidate assessment, and employee referral tooling.
7. Sales Applications
Outbound Prospecting Template: "Hi [Name], I noticed [Company] uses Workable for recruiting. We help Workable customers like [similar company from enriched data] reduce time-to-hire by 40% with [specific integration/feature]. Based on TechnologyChecker.io data, [Company]'s tech stack includes LinkedIn and Slack, our tool syncs candidates from LinkedIn Recruiter directly into Workable and posts interview updates to your hiring Slack channel. Would you be open to a 15-min demo?"
Targeting Strategy on TechnologyChecker.io: Filter for companies using Workable + LinkedIn + (React OR Next.js) + founded 2015-2022 + 11-200 employees + US/UK location. This isolates fast-growth tech companies with sophisticated recruiting needs who are likely outgrowing Workable's native features and need integrations, analytics, or automation layers.
Competitive Displacement Angle: Target companies that recently migrated FROM Workable to Greenhouse/Lever (identifiable via TechnologyChecker.io's migration data) within the last 6 months. These companies experienced switching pain and may be open to tools that make their new ATS work better (data enrichment, candidate sourcing, interview scheduling). Outreach: "We help companies who recently switched to [Greenhouse/Lever] get more value from their investment by..."
About Our Data
This analysis draws on 1,563 enriched companies matched to LinkedIn profiles from TechnologyChecker.io's detection pool of 2,027 active Workable domains (77.2% match rate), plus usage history data from 2009 to mid-2025, migration flows across 5 competitor platforms, and tech stack co-occurrence data from 100 most commonly paired technologies. Data updated monthly across 50M+ crawled domains.
Customer Reviews (G2)
Customer Sentiment: G2 reviewers cite ease of use (200 mentions) as the top strength, while limited customization (68 mentions) as the most common complaint. Users also value integrated recruiting process (113 mentions). Secondary concerns include missing features (61 mentions). The positive-to-negative mention ratio of 2.1:1 indicates strong overall satisfaction.
What G2 Reviewers Say
G2 reviews from enterprise users show a clear picture. ease of use (200 mentions) dominates the positive sentiment, reinforcing the adoption trends in our company data. The biggest concern? limited customization (68 mentions). Enterprise buyers evaluating this tool should weigh these signals alongside our technographic data for a complete picture.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who uses Workable?
Workable is used by 1,495 companies worldwide, including Safran Group, Virgin, LinkedIn, based on our analysis of 50M+ crawled domains at TechnologyChecker.io. It's particularly popular in the Software Development industry (10.56% of customers).
How many customers does Workable have?
Workable has 1,495 active customers detected through our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains. We enriched 1,495 of these with LinkedIn company data on TechnologyChecker.io to generate detailed insights. An additional 4,005 sites that previously used Workable are also tracked.
What is Workable's market share?
Workable holds 4.69% of the HR & Recruitment market, ranking #5 in the category — based on our analysis of 50M+ domains and 40K+ technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.
What are the best alternatives to Workable?
The top alternatives to Workable include WP Job Openings (20.7% market share), Teamtailor (8.29% market share), ADP Workforce Now (6.52% market share), Rippling (5.59% market share) — based on our market share data across 50M+ crawled domains.
Which countries use Workable the most?
United States leads with 611 Workable customers, followed by United Kingdom (460), Canada (68), Greece (37), Australia (28), based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.
What size companies use Workable?
The most common company size is 1-10 employees, representing 41.2% of Workable customers, based on our analysis of 1,495 enriched companies. This is followed by 11-50 employees (26%) and 51-200 employees (18.9%).
How old are companies that use Workable?
The majority of Workable customers were founded in the 2010s (45.64%), followed by the 2020s (17.42%), based on our analysis of 1,495 enriched companies. This suggests Workable is most popular among relatively young companies.
What is the ideal customer profile for Workable?
The ideal Workable customer is: Company Size: Small to medium-sized businesses (1-200 employees represent 86.1% of users), Location: English-speaking markets (US 39.1%, UK 29.4%, CA 4.3%), Top City: London leads with concentrated UK adoption, Founded: Digital-first companies established in the 2010s, Company Age: Primarily post-2010 startups and scale-ups (63.1% founded 2010+) — based on our analysis of 1,495 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.
What job boards does Workable post to?
Workable integrates with multiple free and paid job boards. Free options include Indeed Organic Listings, Glassdoor (via Indeed), LinkedIn Limited Listings, Adzuna, CareerJet, ZipRecruiter, and Google for Jobs. The platform also supports premium job board integrations through its partners directory, including SEEK (Jobstreet, JobsDB), specialized industry boards, and regional platforms. Our detection data shows 68.3% of Workable customers also use LinkedIn, suggesting LinkedIn integration is a critical sourcing channel. Companies can post to multiple boards simultaneously from the Workable dashboard.
Is Workable like Indeed?
No, Workable and Indeed serve different functions. Indeed is a job board where candidates search for openings across employers. Workable is an applicant tracking system (ATS) that helps employers manage the hiring process, posting jobs, tracking candidates, scheduling interviews, and making offers. Workable integrates WITH Indeed to syndicate job postings to Indeed's platform. Interestingly, our data shows Indeed, Inc. Itself uses Workable for internal recruiting operations, demonstrating the complementary nature of the two platforms.
What are the competitors of Workable?
Workable's main competitors in the HR & recruitment software market include WP Job Openings (20.7% market share), Teamtailor (8.29%), ADP Workforce Now (6.52%), Rippling (5.59%), and SuccessFactors (4.08%). More specialized competitors include Greenhouse, Lever, BambooHR, Zoho Recruit, and JazzHR. Our migration data shows the most common switching patterns are with Greenhouse (146 companies switched away, 72 switched to Workable) and Lever (120 away, 69 to), indicating these are direct substitutes. Rippling represents a growing competitive threat, with 47 companies migrating from Workable to Rippling's all-in-one HR platform in the last year.
How much does Workable cost per month?
Workable offers tiered monthly pricing starting at $189/month for the Starter plan, $313+/month for the Standard plan, and $628+/month for the Premier plan (pricing for 1-20 employees; scales with company size). Workable also offers a 15-day free trial where you can post jobs and collect candidates; after the trial, jobs are archived but you retain account access. Add-on features like texting ($49/month) and video interviews ($59/month) cost extra. Pricing follows a per-company model rather than per-user, with tiers based on employee count and feature access.
What are the cons of using Workable?
Based on user feedback, the most common criticisms of Workable include limited customization in reporting and screening options, which can hinder companies with specific hiring workflows. Some users find the platform less flexible for highly customized enterprise workflows compared to competitors like Greenhouse or Lever. Our migration data supports this: Workable lost 146 companies to Greenhouse and 120 to Lever, suggesting some users outgrow the platform as hiring complexity increases. 47 companies switched to Rippling in the past year, indicating some users prefer an all-in-one HR suite over specialized recruitment software.
Is Workable a good place to work?
According to Glassdoor, Workable has an employee rating of 2.9 out of 5 stars based on 197 company reviews, which is 25% below the average for Information Technology industry employers (3.9 stars). This suggests most employees have an average working experience. The company has helped 27,000 companies hire over 1.5 million people since its founding in 2009 and raised $50 million in Series C funding, bringing total funding to $84 million. However, employee satisfaction ratings indicate room for improvement in workplace culture and employee experience.
What is Workable used for?
Workable is an all-in-one HR platform that combines applicant tracking, employee management, time tracking, and payroll tools. Companies use it to source candidates (via integrations with LinkedIn, Indeed, and 50+ job boards), track applicants through hiring pipelines, schedule interviews, collaborate with hiring teams, and make offers. The platform also includes HRIS features for employee onboarding, time and attendance tracking, and basic HR workflows. Our tech stack data shows 81.5% of Workable customers pair it with Google Analytics, indicating they track recruitment funnel metrics closely.
Can I tell if a company uses an ATS?
Yes, you can often determine if a company uses an applicant tracking system by checking the application portal's URL. Many ATS platforms (including Workable) use distinct subdomains or URL patterns, for example, careers.companyname.com or companyname.workable.com. Our detection data identifies companies using Workable by analyzing these URL patterns across 50M+ domains. You can also look for ATS branding in the job application interface (logos, footer text), or check the page source code for technology identifiers. TechnologyChecker.io provides a verified list of 1,466 companies actively using Workable with detection URLs.
Is Workable still used in 2026?
Yes, Workable remains actively used in 2026, though growth has moderated from its 2020-2024 hypergrowth phase. Our latest data shows 1,296 active domains in July 2025, down slightly from a peak of 1,495 in December 2024. The platform continues to release new features, in February 2026, Workable rebuilt its reporting platform from the ground up and announced upcoming AI capabilities (Insights Generator). Reviews from early 2026 confirm the platform is competitive with active development, though some users have noted pricing increases for long-term customers.
What kind of company is Workable?
Workable is a software-as-a-service (SaaS) company that provides a recruitment and human resources (HR) management platform. Founded in 2009 and headquartered in Athens, Greece, the company has raised $84 million in total funding (including a $50 million Series C round). Workable serves 30,000+ companies across 100+ countries and has helped them hire over 1.5 million people. The company operates on a subscription pricing model with tiered plans based on company size and feature access.
What are the pros of using Workable?
Workable is praised for ease of use, structured hiring pipelines, candidate tracking, and collaboration features. The platform balances simplicity with practical hiring depth, making it accessible for small teams while still supporting structured workflows. Our data shows 83.4% of customers pair Workable with Google Tag Manager, indicating they value the platform's integration capabilities. Key strengths include one-click job board syndication (Indeed, LinkedIn, Google for Jobs), mobile-friendly candidate experiences, and fast implementation times. The platform works well for companies that need to hire quickly without a 6-month ATS implementation.
Is Workable only for small businesses?
While Workable is predominantly used by small businesses (67.2% of customers have 50 or fewer employees, 41.2% have 1-10 employees), it's not exclusively for small companies. Notable enterprise users include LinkedIn (10,001+ employees), Virgin (10,001+ employees), Safran Group (10,001+ employees), Access Bank (10,001+ employees), and Indeed, Inc. (10,001+ employees). However. Only 0.6% of Workable customers have 10,001+ employees, indicating enterprise adoption represents outlier deployments (specific business units, regional offices) rather than company-wide installations. The platform is improved for small-to-medium teams that value speed and simplicity over enterprise customization.
Based on 1,495 company data
These insights include all TechnologCchecker.io detections of Workable (free & paid plans).