Companies Using FingerprintJS
Our database tracks 49,576 companies using FingerprintJS, from indie developers to Fortune 500 brands that use FingerprintJS like Verizon, Nike, and Western Union. Below you'll find a full list of companies using FingerprintJS with market share data, industry breakdowns, and geographic distribution across 6,815 enriched company profiles.
FingerprintJS holds a 63% share of the browser fingerprinting market, ranking #1 with over 26,900 GitHub stars and 5 million monthly npm downloads. The top companies using FingerprintJS include Dropbox, Standard Chartered, and P&G alongside thousands of websites using FingerprintJS for fraud detection and visitor identification. Companies using FingerprintJS span retail, fintech, and software development.
Published Apr 11, 2026 · Updated Apr 11, 2026 · Data analysed on April 11, 2026.
FingerprintJS Usage Statistics
FingerprintJS grew from 2 active domains in May 2020 to over 33,888 at its peak in May 2025, a 16,944x increase in five years. The sharpest acceleration began in April 2024, when active domains jumped from 4,250 to 13,238 in a single month. This surge coincides with Fingerprint's $33M Series C led by Nexus Venture Partners (PR Newswire, Oct 2023), bringing total funding to $77M. The open-source library now gets 5 million npm downloads per month, with the commercial Pro SDK adding another 1.3 million. As of July 2025, active domains sit at 30,903, and the company reported 175% revenue growth over two years with 50 new enterprise customers in FY2025 (BusinessWire, Apr 2025).
List of Companies Using FingerprintJS
Download all 49,576 FingerprintJS customers with full company data, or create a signal to track when companies start or stop using FingerprintJS.
| Company | Detection URL | Domain | Country | Industry | Employees | Type | Founded | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| community.verizon.com | verizon.com | United States | IT Services and IT Consulting | 10001+ | Public Company | 1983 | https://linkedin.com/company/verizon | |
| aus.com | aus.com | United States | Professional Services | 10001+ | Privately Held | 2016 | https://linkedin.com/company/allied-universal | |
| pg.com | pg.com | United States | Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | — | https://linkedin.com/company/procter-and-gamble | |
| self-service.vpnconnection.tencent.com | tencent.com | China | Software Development | 10001+ | Public Company | 1998 | https://linkedin.com/company/tencentglobal | |
| share-nikebyyou.nike.com | nike.com | United States | Retail | 10001+ | Public Company | 1972 | https://linkedin.com/company/nike | |
| sc.com | sc.com | United Kingdom | Banking | 10001+ | Public Company | 1853 | https://linkedin.com/company/standardchartered | |
| mail.cn.manpowergroup.com | manpowergroup.com | United States | Staffing and Recruiting | 10001+ | Public Company | 1948 | https://linkedin.com/company/manpowergroup | |
| sales-resources-prodorigin.broadcom.com | broadcom.com | United States | Semiconductor Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1991 | https://linkedin.com/company/broadcom | |
| cummins.com | cummins.com | United States | Motor Vehicle Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1919 | https://linkedin.com/company/cummins-inc | |
| stage2.adminconsole.adobe.com | adobe.com | United States | Software Development | 10001+ | Public Company | 1982 | https://linkedin.com/company/adobe |
Show 26 more FingerprintJS using companies as demo data
| Company | Detection URL | Country | Industry | Employees | Type | Founded | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| login.ti.com | ti.com | United States | Semiconductor Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1930 | https://linkedin.com/company/texas-instruments | |
| redcross.org | redcross.org | United States | Non-profit Organizations | 10001+ | Nonprofit | 1881 | https://linkedin.com/company/american-red-cross | |
| myplantransition.awspubliccloud.nationwide.com | nationwide.com | United States | Insurance | 10001+ | Privately Held | — | https://linkedin.com/company/nationwide | |
| colgatepalmolive.com | colgatepalmolive.com | United States | Manufacturing | 10001+ | Public Company | 1806 | https://linkedin.com/company/colgate-palmolive | |
| magviewnla.christushealth.org | christushealth.org | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 10001+ | Nonprofit | 1999 | https://linkedin.com/company/christus-health | |
| commercialcardmanagement.truist.com | truist.com | United States | Financial Services | 10001+ | Public Company | 2019 | https://linkedin.com/company/truistfinancialcorporation | |
| auladigital.comunidad.madrid | comunidad.madrid | Spain | Government Administration | 10001+ | Government Agency | 1983 | https://linkedin.com/company/comunidad-de-madrid | |
| opentext.com | opentext.com | Canada | Software Development | 10001+ | Public Company | 1991 | https://linkedin.com/company/opentext | |
| sso-trial.bnsf.com | bnsf.com | United States | Freight and Package Transportation | 10001+ | Privately Held | — | https://linkedin.com/company/bnsf-railway | |
| store.kornferry.com | kornferry.com | United States | Business Consulting and Services | 10001+ | Public Company | — | https://linkedin.com/company/kornferry | |
| digitalv1.coto.com.ar | coto.com.ar | Argentina | International Trade and Development | 10001+ | Self-Owned | — | https://linkedin.com/company/coto-cicsa | |
| my.massmart.co.za | massmart.co.za | South Africa | Retail | 10001+ | Public Company | — | https://linkedin.com/company/massmart | |
| fortinet.com | fortinet.com | United States | Computer and Network Security | 10001+ | Public Company | 2000 | https://linkedin.com/company/fortinet | |
| westernunion.com | westernunion.com | United States | Financial Services | 5001-10000 | Public Company | 1851 | https://linkedin.com/company/western-union | |
| screeners.paramount.com | paramount.com | United States | Entertainment Providers | 10001+ | Public Company | — | https://linkedin.com/company/paramountco | |
| selfservice.prismahealth.org | prismahealth.org | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 10001+ | Nonprofit | 2017 | https://linkedin.com/company/prisma-health | |
| auth.acosta.com | acosta.com | United States | Retail | 10001+ | Privately Held | 1927 | https://linkedin.com/company/acosta | |
| kb.databricks.com | databricks.com | United States | Software Development | 5001-10000 | Privately Held | 2013 | https://linkedin.com/company/databricks | |
| shop.drhorton.com | drhorton.com | United States | Construction | 5001-10000 | Public Company | 1978 | https://linkedin.com/company/dr-horton | |
| magviewportal.urmc.rochester.edu | rochester.edu | United States | Higher Education | 10001+ | Educational | 1850 | https://linkedin.com/company/university-of-rochester | |
| aaa.com | aaa.com | United States | Insurance | 5001-10000 | Privately Held | 1901 | https://linkedin.com/company/the-auto-club-group | |
| simplraccess.fsresidential.com | fsresidential.com | United States | Real Estate | 10001+ | Public Company | — | https://linkedin.com/company/firstservice-residential | |
| visit.program.partnerski.pkobp.pl | pkobp.pl | Poland | Banking | 10001+ | Public Company | 1919 | https://linkedin.com/company/pko-bp | |
| permissions.penguinrandomhouse.com | penguinrandomhouse.com | United States | Book Publishing | 10001+ | Privately Held | 2013 | https://linkedin.com/company/penguin-random-house-publishing | |
| editora.fgv.br | fgv.br | Brazil | Higher Education | 1001-5000 | Nonprofit | 1944 | https://linkedin.com/company/fgv | |
| forbes.com | forbes.com | United States | Book and Periodical Publishing | 201-500 | Privately Held | 1917 | https://linkedin.com/company/forbes-magazine |
There are 49,576 companies and websites using FingerprintJS, sign up to download the entire FingerprintJS dataset.
Here are some of the most recognizable companies using FingerprintJS and brands using FingerprintJS in 2026:
- Dropbox - Uses Fingerprint to stop account takeover attacks, per Fingerprint's published case studies
- Western Union - Global money transfer company detected on westernunion.com, also listed on Fingerprint's trusted-by section
- Verizon - Deploys FingerprintJS on community.verizon.com for visitor identification
- Nike - Runs FingerprintJS on its NikeByYou custom shoe builder (share-nikebyyou.nike.com)
- Neiman Marcus - Increased returning visitor recognition from 8-10% to 23% using Fingerprint, per their published testimonial
- Standard Chartered - Global bank using FingerprintJS for device identification across customer-facing portals
- Checkout.com - Payment processor using Fingerprint for fraud detection, reached production in under a week per their case study
- Adobe - Runs FingerprintJS on admin console infrastructure (stage2.adminconsole.adobe.com)
- Forbes - Media publisher using FingerprintJS for visitor fingerprinting on forbes.com
- Texas Instruments - Uses FingerprintJS on login.ti.com for device recognition
Which Countries Use FingerprintJS the Most?
Which countries use FingerprintJS the most? The United States leads with 3,059 enriched companies (55.5%) of the matched base, consistent with the library's Chicago headquarters and English-language documentation. Brazil ranks a surprising second at 562 companies (10.2%), ahead of the UK at 506 (9.2%). Fingerprint confirmed this Latin American traction in its April 2025 press release, naming Banco Pan, Grupo Acosta Ganha, and Banco C6 S.A. as regional customers and launching an Android Freemium tier in Brazil, India, and Indonesia (BusinessWire, Apr 2025). India (206 companies) rounds out the top five, with vendor-confirmed customers Razorpay, Zepto, and Uni Cards active in the market.
FingerprintJS Market Share Among Browser Fingerprinting
What is FingerprintJS's market share? FingerprintJS commands a dominant 63.12% share of the browser fingerprinting category, making it the clear #1 with 49,576 active domains out of 78,565 total in the category. That's more than double Fingerprint Pro's 28.67%, based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. MaxMind (3.88%) and ThreatMetrix (3.54%) trail far behind as distant third and fourth options.
Top Competitors by Market Share
FingerprintJS Customers by Company Size & Age
Is FingerprintJS only for small companies? The data says mostly yes, but not exclusively. With 73.2% of FingerprintJS customers having 10 or fewer employees, the library overwhelmingly serves micro-businesses, indie developers, and early-stage startups building fraud detection into their apps. Adding the 11-50 range brings the total to 88.1% small businesses. However, the 0.8% at 10,001+ employees includes names like Verizon, Nike, Adobe, and Broadcom, showing that enterprise adoption exists, though it represents the tail end of the distribution.
Company Size Distribution
Company Age (Founded Decade)
What Industries Use FingerprintJS the Most?
Retail leads at 12.26% of enriched companies, followed by Software Development (4.23%) and Restaurants (3.44%). The retail concentration tracks with Fingerprint's published use cases: Skipify uses Fingerprint to recognize 70% of returning shoppers and helped American Signature Furniture cut fraud by $2M annually. The software development segment reflects developers embedding FingerprintJS into their own products. Motor Vehicle Manufacturing (3.17%) and IT Services (3.09%) round out the top five. No single vertical dominates beyond retail, based on our analysis of 6,815 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.
Retail brands using FingerprintJS represent the platform's largest vertical at 12.26% of enriched companies, driven by checkout fraud prevention and returning visitor recognition. Neiman Marcus, for example, boosted returning visitor identification from 8-10% to 23% of total visits after adopting Fingerprint (per their published testimonial). Financial services companies on FingerprintJS (banking and insurance combined) make up roughly 5% of the base, including Truist, Western Union, PKO Bank Polski, and Uni Cards, which saves ₹6.5M monthly from prevented ATO fraud (Uni Cards case study). Technology companies using FingerprintJS (software + IT + technology) reach 10.7%, reflecting the library's developer-first distribution via npm.
FingerprintJS Alternatives & Competitors
The browser fingerprinting market has a clear leader, based on our market share data across 50M+ crawled domains at TechnologyChecker.io. FingerprintJS holds 63.12%, more than 2x its closest competitor. Fingerprint Pro (28.67%) is the commercial upgrade built by the same company (Fingerprint Inc., $77M funded), offering server-side identification with a claimed 99.5% accuracy rate (per Fingerprint's accuracy blog post). MaxMind (3.88%) focuses on IP geolocation and fraud scoring. ThreatMetrix (3.54%), now part of LexisNexis Risk Solutions, targets enterprise fraud prevention.
| Technology | Domains | Market Share |
|---|---|---|
| 22,520 | 28.67% | |
| 3,050 | 3.88% | |
| 2,783 | 3.54% | |
| 476 | 0.61% | |
| 114 | 0.15% |
FingerprintJS Customer Migration
Based on 6,814 enriched companies, migration data reveals a clear pattern between FingerprintJS and its commercial sibling. 131 companies switched from Fingerprint Pro to FingerprintJS, while only 88 went the other direction, a 1.49:1 gain ratio favoring the free library. This reversal (paid-to-free instead of free-to-paid) correlates with G2's #1 complaint being pricing (60 mentions). Of those 131 gains, 110 happened in the last year alone. Fingerprint's own pricing starts at $99/mo for 20K API calls, then $4 per additional 1,000 (fingerprint.com/pricing). Against ThreatMetrix, FingerprintJS gained 23 and lost 11 (2.09:1 ratio). The MaxMind flow is nearly even: 19 gained versus 20 lost.
| Competitor | Gained | Lost | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
+131 | -88 | +43 | |
+19 | -20 | -1 | |
+23 | -11 | +12 | |
+14 | -6 | +8 |
Tech Stack of FingerprintJS-Powered Websites
The technology ecosystem around FingerprintJS skews toward enterprise tooling and legacy frameworks. Cloudflare Radar leads web analytics at 12.9%, with Microsoft Clarity (9.0%) and Bing UET (8.76%) close behind, suggesting a Microsoft-heavy enterprise stack. For bot detection, Cloudflare Bot Manager (6.24%) is the only tool with meaningful overlap, indicating that most FingerprintJS users rely on the library itself for device identification rather than layering additional bot detection. The JavaScript framework breakdown is telling: Vue v2 (4.68%) and AngularJS (3.89%) top the list, both older frameworks, which aligns with the library's appeal to applications maintaining legacy codebases.
Web Analytics
Bot Detection & CAPTCHA
JavaScript Frameworks
CMS
FingerprintJS Customer Reviews with Pros and Cons
Across G2 reviews, FingerprintJS earns strong marks for ease of use (131 mentions) and simple setup (99 mentions). Case studies confirm this: FlightHub integrated Fingerprint in weeks and had a trained fraud model within three months (FlightHub case study). ZBD's product manager called the documentation "miles ahead of other vendors" (ZBD case study). The most common criticism is pricing (60 mentions), with costs that escalate with API call volume. A second concern around inaccuracy (31 mentions) cites false positives that flag real users. The pricing complaints correlate with migration data: 88 companies switched from FingerprintJS to Fingerprint Pro, while 131 came back, suggesting many found the commercial tier too expensive at scale.
Generated from real user reviews on G2
- Users find Fingerprint to be easy to use, with smooth integration and effective fraud detection capabilities.(131 reviews)
- Users appreciate the simple setup of Fingerprint, enabling quick and hassle-free integration into their systems.(99 reviews)
- Users value the ease of setup with Fingerprint, appreciating its smooth integration into various applications and workflows.(98 reviews)
- Users appreciate the easy integration of Fingerprint with apps and web platforms, enabling swift, effective implementation.(98 reviews)
- Users find Fingerprint expensive as costs increase with usage, affecting overall value despite its features.(60 reviews)
- Users report inaccuracy issues, with false positives affecting real users and complicating integrations and decisions.(31 reviews)
- Users express a need for improvement with the limited uptime SLA and issues with VPN detection and Cloudfront integration.(18 reviews)
- Users find the inflexible pricing challenging, especially for startups transitioning from free to premium plans.(16 reviews)
Expert Analysis: FingerprintJS Growth Trends & Key Signals for Sales Teams in 2026

With 10+ years in web crawling and technographic data analysis, I've examined FingerprintJS's growth trajectory and customer profile using our 6,815 enriched company dataset (a 13.75% match rate against 49,576 active domains), as of our April 2026 crawl at TechnologyChecker.io. We matched FingerprintJS domains against LinkedIn company profiles to uncover who actually uses the library, where they're located, and how the competitive picture is shifting. FingerprintJS sits at an interesting intersection: it's an open-source library that competes directly with its own commercial upgrade, Fingerprint Pro.
Growth trajectory
FingerprintJS went from 2 active domains in May 2020 to a peak of 33,888 in May 2025. That's a 16,944x increase in five years. The growth wasn't linear. It came in two distinct waves. The first wave (2021-2023) was steady, climbing from single digits to roughly 3,500 active domains by late 2023. The second wave started in April 2024, when active domains exploded from 4,250 to 13,238 in a single month. By September 2024, the count had reached 17,918. By May 2025, it topped 33,888.
What caused the April 2024 spike? Fingerprint announced its $33M Series C in October 2023, led by Nexus Venture Partners with participation from Uncorrelated Ventures (PR Newswire), bringing total funding to $77M across 4 rounds. The company reported 175% revenue growth over two years and added 50 new enterprise customers in FY2025 (BusinessWire, Apr 2025). The open-source library now sees 5 million npm downloads per month (with the Pro SDK adding 1.3 million more), and the GitHub repo has accumulated 26,900+ stars. The current count of 30,903 active domains (July 2025) represents a slight pullback from the May peak, consistent with seasonal patterns.
"A 16,944x growth rate over five years is extraordinary even by open-source standards. But the real story is the April 2024 inflection point, where a single month added more domains than the previous two years combined. That kind of step-function growth points to a distribution event, not organic adoption." - Mehmet Suleyman, CEO at TechnologyChecker.io
Sales Signal: The post-April 2024 cohort represents the majority of FingerprintJS's active base. These are newer adopters who haven't yet built deep integrations. They're the most likely segment to evaluate commercial alternatives, upgrade to Fingerprint Pro, or add complementary fraud prevention tools. Target companies that started using FingerprintJS in the last 12-18 months with messaging about scaling limitations of the free tier.
Customer profile
The enriched data paints a clear picture. 73.2% of FingerprintJS customers have 1-10 employees. Combined with the 11-50 bracket, 88.1% are small businesses. The age distribution reinforces this: 42.71% were founded in the 2010s and 25.42% in the 2020s. That means 68.13% are digital-native companies less than 15 years old. This is a developer-driven tool adopted overwhelmingly by startups and indie projects.
Yet the enterprise tail is real. Our company list includes Verizon, Nike, Adobe, P&G, Standard Chartered, Broadcom, and Texas Instruments. Fingerprint's own pricing page lists Dropbox, US Bank, Western Union, Binance, Trustpilot, TikTok, and Rockstar Games as customers. Published case studies add specifics: Neiman Marcus boosted returning visitor recognition from 8-10% to 23%, and Checkout.com's fraud engineering team reached production in under a week. The detection URL pattern tells the story: Verizon uses it on community.verizon.com, Nike on share-nikebyyou.nike.com, Adobe on stage2.adminconsole.adobe.com. These are targeted subdomain deployments, not company-wide rollouts. Enterprise companies adopt FingerprintJS for isolated use cases (login security, fraud detection on a single portal) before potentially upgrading to Fingerprint Pro.
Sales Signal: The 88.1% small business concentration means volume-based outreach works best for this install base. For enterprise accounts (0.8% at 10,001+ employees), focus on the expansion play: they're already using the open-source library on one subdomain. Position your product as the tool they'll need when they deploy fingerprinting across more surfaces. Reference specific detection URLs to demonstrate that you understand their current setup.
Industry and geographic concentration
Retail dominates at 12.26%, the only vertical in double digits. Software Development follows at 4.23%, then Restaurants at 3.44%. The retail concentration makes practical sense. Browser fingerprinting solves three core retail problems: coupon fraud, account sharing, and returning visitor identification. The restaurant presence (3.44%) is surprising until you consider that many "restaurant" companies in our data are actually online ordering platforms and delivery aggregators that need bot protection.
Geographically, the United States leads at 55.5% (3,059 companies), but the second-place finish is unexpected. Brazil ranks #2 at 10.2% (562 companies), ahead of the UK at 9.2% (506). Fingerprint's April 2025 press release confirms this Latin American momentum, naming Banco Pan, Grupo Acosta Ganha, and Banco C6 S.A. as regional customers (BusinessWire). The company also launched an Android Freemium tier specifically targeting Brazil, India, and Indonesia with 500,000 free API calls. India (206 companies, 3.7%) has vendor-confirmed customers including Razorpay, Zepto, and Uni Cards, the latter saving ₹6.5M monthly (~$78K) from prevented ATO fraud (Uni Cards case study).
Sales Signal: Brazil is underserved relative to its adoption. With 562 companies and growing, it's the second-largest FingerprintJS market but likely receives less sales attention than the US or UK. If your product serves Brazilian fintechs or ecommerce companies, the FingerprintJS install base is a pre-qualified prospect list. For US-focused outreach, filter by retail (12.26%) and financial services (1.96%) to find the companies with the highest willingness to pay for fraud prevention tooling.
Migration patterns
The migration data between FingerprintJS and Fingerprint Pro reveals an unusual dynamic. 131 companies switched from Fingerprint Pro to FingerprintJS (the open-source version), while only 88 moved from FingerprintJS to Fingerprint Pro. That's a 1.49:1 ratio favoring the free library over the paid product. In most markets, migration flows from free to paid. Here, the reverse is true.
The timing adds context. Of those 131 Fingerprint Pro defectors, 110 switched in the last year. This correlates with G2 reviews citing pricing as the #1 complaint (60 mentions) and inflexible pricing (16 mentions) as a specific pain point. Companies tried the paid tier, found it too expensive for their scale, and reverted to the open-source library. Against other competitors, FingerprintJS holds a 2.09:1 advantage over ThreatMetrix (23 gained vs. 11 lost) and runs nearly even with MaxMind (19 gained vs. 20 lost).
"The 1.49:1 migration ratio from Fingerprint Pro back to FingerprintJS isn't a competitive weakness for the platform. It's a pricing signal. Companies are telling you they want fingerprinting capability but can't justify the commercial tier at current price points. That gap is where alternative tools and custom solutions find their market." - Mehmet Suleyman, CEO at TechnologyChecker.io
Sales Signal: The 110 companies that recently switched from Fingerprint Pro back to FingerprintJS are actively cost-sensitive buyers who still need fingerprinting. They downgraded on price, not on need. If you sell a fraud prevention or identity verification tool that competes on cost, these 110 companies are your highest-intent prospects. They've already proven they'll pay for fingerprinting; they just need a better price point.
Technology ecosystem
The tech stack data around FingerprintJS reveals a surprising skew toward enterprise and legacy tooling. Cloudflare Radar leads web analytics at 12.9%, followed by Microsoft Clarity (9.0%) and Bing UET (8.76%). The Microsoft-heavy analytics stack (Clarity + Bing UET together at 17.76%) suggests that a meaningful portion of FingerprintJS domains sit within Microsoft-ecosystem companies or use Azure-hosted infrastructure.
The JavaScript framework overlap is particularly telling. Vue v2 (4.68%) and AngularJS (3.89%) are the top two frameworks. Both are legacy. Vue 3 has been the default since 2022. AngularJS reached end-of-life in January 2022. This means FingerprintJS is heavily deployed in applications that haven't migrated to modern frameworks, which makes sense: these are often internal tools, login portals, and dashboards where fingerprinting adds security value but where full frontend rewrites aren't a priority.
For bot detection, Cloudflare Bot Manager (6.24%) is the only meaningful overlap. The remaining tools (Hu-manity.co at 0.57%, AWS WAF CAPTCHA at 0.41%) have minimal presence. This suggests most FingerprintJS users treat the library as their primary device identification layer rather than combining it with dedicated bot detection services.
Sales Signal: The Vue v2 and AngularJS concentration identifies companies running older applications. These companies likely have limited frontend engineering resources and prefer drop-in tools over complex integrations. If your product requires minimal code changes (a script tag or simple SDK), emphasize that in outreach to FingerprintJS users. Conversely, if your product requires React or Next.js, you'll have a smaller addressable market within this install base.
G2 review signals
I've cross-referenced our crawl data with G2 review sentiment and Fingerprint's published case studies to triangulate the user experience. The top positive signals are ease of use (131 mentions), simple setup (99 mentions), ease of setup (98 mentions), and easy integration (98 mentions). Four of the top four pros are variations of the same theme: this thing is easy to install. Case studies confirm it. FlightHub's fraud team integrated Fingerprint in weeks with a lean dev team. ZBD's product manager called the documentation "miles ahead of other vendors." When 73.2% of your users have fewer than 10 employees, ease of implementation isn't a nice-to-have. It's the reason they chose you.
The negative signals are more informative. Pricing at 60 mentions is the #1 complaint. Pro Plus starts at $99/mo for 20K API calls, then $4 per additional 1,000 (fingerprint.com/pricing). That escalation directly explains the 110 companies that recently downgraded from Fingerprint Pro back to the open-source library. Inaccuracy at 31 mentions is the #2 complaint, with users reporting false positives. Yet FlightHub actually saw a 6% reduction in false positives after switching to Fingerprint from a legacy provider, suggesting the accuracy complaints may be version-dependent or use-case-specific rather than systemic.
Sales Signal: The accuracy complaint (31 mentions) opens a direct competitive angle. If your product offers higher identification accuracy, lead with that in outreach to FingerprintJS users. Don't bash the tool. Instead, frame it as: "FingerprintJS got you started. Here's what you need at scale." The 31 companies that specifically mentioned inaccuracy on G2 are telling you they want better precision and are willing to switch for it.
Key takeaways
1. FingerprintJS owns the browser fingerprinting category. 63.12% market share, 49,576 active domains, and 16,944x growth in five years. The open-source model has created a distribution advantage that commercial competitors struggle to match.
2. The customer base is overwhelmingly small and young. 73.2% have 10 or fewer employees. 68.13% were founded after 2010. Enterprise logos exist but represent isolated subdomain deployments, not company-wide infrastructure.
3. Brazil is the surprise #2 market. With 562 companies (10.2%), it outranks the UK. Fingerprint confirmed this with named customers Banco Pan, Grupo Acosta Ganha, and Banco C6 S.A., plus a dedicated Android Freemium tier for the region.
4. The Fingerprint Pro migration pattern is unusual. More companies are moving from paid to free (131) than free to paid (88). Pricing sensitivity is the primary driver, confirmed by G2 review sentiment.
5. Retail is the strongest vertical. At 12.26%, it's the only industry in double digits. Coupon fraud, account sharing, and returning visitor identification drive adoption.
6. The tech stack skews legacy. Vue v2 and AngularJS lead framework adoption. These are older applications maintained by small teams, which aligns with the library's developer-first, easy-to-install positioning.
Sales applications
Outreach template for FingerprintJS users:
"Hi [Name], I noticed [Company] uses FingerprintJS on [specific subdomain from detection URL]. Our data shows that 73% of FingerprintJS users are small teams, and most hit accuracy limits around [X monthly visitors]. We help companies like yours [specific value prop] without the scaling costs of Fingerprint Pro. Worth a quick look?"
Targeting strategy: Filter the FingerprintJS install base by company size (1-50 employees), industry (retail or financial services), geography (US or Brazil), and founding year (2010-2020). This narrows to digital-native companies with revenue, fraud exposure, and a proven willingness to implement fingerprinting. For enterprise accounts, use the detection URL data to identify which subdomain runs FingerprintJS and reference it directly in outreach.
Competitive angle: Don't position against FingerprintJS directly. It's open-source and free. Instead, position as the next step. The G2 data gives you the opening: 60 mentions of pricing concerns and 31 mentions of accuracy issues. Frame your outreach around solving the specific problems that FingerprintJS users already complain about. For the 110 companies that recently left Fingerprint Pro, lead with cost savings. For the 31 that mentioned accuracy issues, lead with precision.
Explore the full FingerprintJS install base with company-level filtering at TechnologyChecker.io. Our dataset covers 49,576 active FingerprintJS domains with 6,815 enriched companies including industry, size, location, and tech stack data. Use the "Create Lead List" feature to build targeted prospect lists, or set up a Signal to track when companies start or stop using FingerprintJS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who uses FingerprintJS?
FingerprintJS is used by 49,576 companies worldwide, including Verizon Communications Inc., Allied Universal Security, P&G, based on our analysis of 50M+ crawled domains at TechnologyChecker.io. It's particularly popular in the Retail industry (12.26% of customers).
How many customers does FingerprintJS have?
FingerprintJS has 49,576 active customers detected through our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains. We enriched 6,815 of these with LinkedIn company data on TechnologyChecker.io to generate detailed insights. An additional 26,828 sites that previously used FingerprintJS are also tracked.
What is FingerprintJS's market share?
FingerprintJS holds 63.12% of the Browser Fingerprinting market, ranking #1 in the category — based on our analysis of 50M+ domains and 40K+ technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.
What are the best alternatives to FingerprintJS?
The top alternatives to FingerprintJS include Fingerprint Pro (28.67% market share), MaxMind (3.88% market share), ThreatMetrix (3.54% market share), ClientJS (0.61% market share) — based on our market share data across 50M+ crawled domains.
Which countries use FingerprintJS the most?
United States leads with 3,059 FingerprintJS customers, followed by Brazil (562), United Kingdom (506), India (206), Canada (148), based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.
What size companies use FingerprintJS?
The most common company size is 1-10 employees, representing 73.2% of FingerprintJS customers, based on our analysis of 6,815 enriched companies. This is followed by 11-50 employees (14.9%) and 51-200 employees (6.7%).
How old are companies that use FingerprintJS?
The majority of FingerprintJS customers were founded in the 2010s (42.71%), followed by the 2020s (25.42%), based on our analysis of 6,815 enriched companies. This suggests FingerprintJS is most popular among relatively young companies.
What is the ideal customer profile for FingerprintJS?
The ideal FingerprintJS customer is: Company Size: 1-10 employees, Location: US, UK, or Brazil, Industry: Retail, Software, or Technology, Founded: 2010-2019, Company Age: 5-15 years old — based on our analysis of 6,815 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.
Is FingerprintJS reliable?
FingerprintJS is reliable enough for production use at scale. G2 reviewers highlight ease of use (131 mentions) and simple setup (99 mentions). FlightHub reduced false positives by 6% after switching to Fingerprint from a legacy provider. However, 31 G2 reviews cite inaccuracy issues with false positives flagging real users. For high-stakes fraud prevention, the commercial Fingerprint Pro (99.5% claimed accuracy) offers server-side processing on top of the open-source client signals.
Who uses browser fingerprinting?
Browser fingerprinting is used by companies across many industries. Our data shows retail (12.26%), software development (4.23%), and restaurants (3.44%) as the top verticals for FingerprintJS adoption. Enterprise companies like Verizon, Nike, and Adobe use it on specific subdomains. Banks such as Standard Chartered and PKO Bank Polski deploy it for fraud detection on customer portals.
What does FingerprintJS do?
FingerprintJS queries 100+ browser attributes (canvas rendering, audio context, installed fonts, WebGL data, screen resolution, and more) to compute a stable hashed visitor identifier. This ID persists across sessions even when cookies are cleared. It's used for fraud prevention, returning visitor recognition, and multi-accounting detection. ZBD, for example, cut multi-accounting by 95% using it. The open-source version runs entirely client-side in the browser.
Which browser is 100% untraceable?
No browser is 100% untraceable. Tor Browser comes closest by standardizing browser attributes to make fingerprints look identical across users. Brave and Firefox with strict privacy settings also resist fingerprinting. However, advanced techniques can still extract partial identifiers. FingerprintJS claims 99.5% accuracy on standard browsers, though privacy-focused browsers significantly reduce that effectiveness.
How do I tell if my browser is being monitored?
You can check for browser fingerprinting by inspecting page source code for scripts like FingerprintJS, using browser developer tools to monitor canvas and WebGL API calls, or visiting sites like EFF's Cover Your Tracks. TechnologyChecker.io also detects FingerprintJS on any website, currently tracking 49,576 active domains. Browser extensions like Privacy Badger can flag fingerprinting attempts in real time.
What is the alternative to FingerprintJS?
The main alternatives include Fingerprint Pro (the commercial upgrade with 28.67% market share), MaxMind (IP-based geolocation and fraud scoring at 3.88%), ThreatMetrix (enterprise device intelligence at 3.54%), and ClientJS (open-source alternative at 0.61%). Each serves different needs: Fingerprint Pro offers server-side accuracy, MaxMind focuses on IP intelligence, and ThreatMetrix targets enterprise fraud teams.
What is the best fingerprint JavaScript library?
FingerprintJS is the most widely adopted option, holding 63.12% market share with 26,900+ GitHub stars and over 5 million monthly npm downloads based on TechnologyChecker.io and npm registry data. ClientJS is the main open-source alternative but has far less adoption at 0.61% market share (476 domains vs. 49,576). For commercial use, Fingerprint Pro adds server-side accuracy at $99/mo and up.
Is browser fingerprinting legal?
Browser fingerprinting legality varies by jurisdiction. Under GDPR (EU), fingerprinting requires user consent because it processes personal data. Under CCPA (California), users must be informed and given opt-out rights. FingerprintJS states it is SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and CCPA compliant. However, implementing the library legally still requires your site to obtain proper consent and disclose fingerprinting in privacy policies.
How much does fingerprint recognition cost?
FingerprintJS, the open-source library, is completely free with no API call limits. Fingerprint Pro has three tiers: Free ($0/mo, 1,000 API calls plus a 14-day Pro Plus trial), Pro Plus ($99/mo for 20K API calls, then $4 per additional 1,000), and Enterprise (custom pricing with 99.9% SLA). Pricing details per fingerprint.com/pricing. G2 reviewers cite pricing as their #1 complaint (60 mentions), noting costs rise quickly with scale.
What are the biggest companies using FingerprintJS?
Our database shows Verizon, Nike, Adobe, P&G, Broadcom, and Standard Chartered using FingerprintJS. Fingerprint's own pricing page lists Dropbox, US Bank, Western Union, Binance, Trustpilot, TikTok, and Rockstar Games as customers. Published case studies confirm Checkout.com, Neiman Marcus, and Glovo. Most enterprise deployments target specific subdomains (login portals, admin consoles) rather than sitewide rollouts.
Does FingerprintJS have a free plan?
Yes. The core FingerprintJS library is open-source and completely free with no API call limits. It runs client-side in the browser. The commercial Fingerprint Pro product also offers a free tier with 1,000 API calls per month. Paid plans (Pro Plus from $99/month) add server-side identification, webhooks, and higher accuracy. Our data shows 49,576 active domains use the library, most on the free open-source version.
Is FingerprintJS open source?
Yes. FingerprintJS is open source under the MIT license, hosted on GitHub with over 26,900 stars and 2,500 forks. The open-source version runs entirely in the browser and provides client-side fingerprinting. Fingerprint Pro, the commercial product built by the same company (Fingerprint Inc.), adds server-side processing, higher accuracy (claimed 99.5%), and features like Smart Signals for VPN and bot detection.
How accurate is FingerprintJS?
The open-source FingerprintJS library provides browser-level accuracy that varies based on browser settings and privacy tools. The commercial Fingerprint Pro product claims 99.5% identification accuracy by combining client-side signals with server-side processing. G2 reviews include 31 mentions of inaccuracy, primarily around false positives. Accuracy drops significantly on privacy-focused browsers like Tor, Brave, and Firefox with enhanced tracking protection.
What industries use FingerprintJS the most?
Retail leads at 12.26% of FingerprintJS customers in our data, driven by checkout fraud and coupon abuse prevention. Skipify, a checkout platform, uses Fingerprint to recognize 70% of returning shoppers and helped one client cut fraud by $2M annually. Software development (4.23%) and restaurants (3.44%) round out the top three. Financial services, banking, and insurance combined represent about 5% of the install base.
How does FingerprintJS compare to Fingerprint Pro?
FingerprintJS is the free, open-source, client-side library (MIT license, 26,900+ GitHub stars). Fingerprint Pro is the paid commercial product from the same company, starting at $99/mo. Pro adds server-side processing, 99.5% claimed accuracy, Smart Signals (VPN detection, bot detection, jailbreak detection), webhooks, and a 99.9% SLA on the Enterprise tier. Both are maintained by Fingerprint Inc., which has raised $77M in venture funding.
Based on 6,815 company data
These insights include all TechnologCchecker.io detections of FingerprintJS (free & paid plans).