Our database tracks domains using Convert, a privacy-focused A/B testing platform. Below you'll find a list of companies using Convert with industry breakdowns, geographic data, and enriched company profiles, based on our analysis of 1,065 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.

Convert currently has minimal active presence in our detection data, with only a handful of current installations. However, our historical analysis of 1,065 enriched companies that have used Convert reveals a platform that serves mid-market businesses in ecommerce, SaaS, and digital agencies, buyers who care about experimentation velocity and privacy compliance in equal measure. Data updated monthly across 50M+ domains at TechnologyChecker.io.

Published Mar 12, 2026 · Updated Mar 12, 2026 · Data analysed on March 12, 2026.

Share:

Convert Usage Statistics

List of Companies Using Convert

Who are the biggest companies using Convert? The customer list at TechnologyChecker.io includes a few recognizable enterprise names, Adecco (10,001+ employees), United Airlines (vacations.united.com), Xerox, HubSpot, and Pirelli, but the majority are mid-market and SMB. Most detections are on subdomains (vacations.united.com, coupons.businessinsider.com, negozi.fastweb.it) rather than root domains, suggesting Convert is deployed for specific campaigns or business units, not site-wide experimentation.

Download all 1,665 Convert customers with full company data, or create a signal to track when companies start or stop using Convert.

Verified list of companies and websites using Convert — sorted by company size. Data from TechnologyChecker's monthly crawl of 29.6M domains.
CompanyDetection URLDomainCountryIndustryEmployeesTypeFoundedLinkedIn
Adecco logoAdecco
cm-adecco-it.prd.cms.adecco.comadecco.comSwitzerlandStaffing and Recruiting10001+Public Company1996https://linkedin.com/company/adecco
United Airlines logoUnited Airlines
vacations.united.comunited.comUnited StatesAirlines and Aviation10001+Public Company1926https://linkedin.com/company/united-airlines
Xerox Corporation logoXerox Corporation
xerox.comxerox.comUnited StatesBusiness Consulting and Services10001+Public Company1906https://linkedin.com/company/xerox
Department of State logoDepartment of State
state.govstate.govUnited StatesInternational Affairs10001+Government Agency1948https://linkedin.com/company/doscareers
Luxoft logoLuxoft
luxoft.comluxoft.comSwitzerlandIT Services and IT Consulting10001+Public Company2000https://linkedin.com/company/luxoft
Pirelli & C. S.p.A. logoPirelli & C. S.p.A.
pirelli.compirelli.comItalyMotor Vehicle Manufacturing10001+Public Company1872https://linkedin.com/company/pirelli
HubSpot, Inc. logoHubSpot, Inc.
hubspot.comhubspot.comUnited StatesSoftware Development5001-10000Public Company2006https://linkedin.com/company/hubspot
Insider Inc logoInsider Inc
coupons.businessinsider.combusinessinsider.comUnited StatesOnline Audio and Video Media201-500Privately Held2007https://linkedin.com/company/businessinsider
Comfort Keepers group logoComfort Keepers group
comfortkeepers.comcomfortkeepers.comUnited StatesIndividual and Family Services51-200Public Company1998https://linkedin.com/company/comfort-keepers
Harvard Business School logoHarvard Business School
hbs.eduhbs.eduUnited StatesHigher Education1001-5000Educational1908https://linkedin.com/company/harvard-business-school
Show 24 more Convert using companies as demo data
CompanyDetection URLCountryIndustryEmployeesTypeFounded
Constellation logoConstellation
navigator.constellation.comconstellation.comUnited StatesIndustrial Automation5001-10000Public Company2005https://linkedin.com/company/auction-bound-llc
Credit Agricole logoCredit Agricole
conti.credit-agricole.itcredit-agricole.itItalyBanking10001+Public Company2007https://linkedin.com/company/creditagricoleitalia
Nature Conservancy logoNature Conservancy
nature.orgnature.orgUnited StatesNon-profit Organizations5001-10000Nonprofit1951https://linkedin.com/company/the-nature-conservancy
Colt logoColt
colt.netcolt.netUnited KingdomTelecommunications5001-10000Privately Held1992https://linkedin.com/company/colt-technology-services
Chemical Abstract Services logoChemical Abstract Services
cas.orgcas.orgUnited StatesIT Services and IT Consulting1001-5000Nonprofit1907https://linkedin.com/company/cas
ClickBank logoClickBank
clickbank.comclickbank.comUnited StatesTechnology, Information and Internet51-200Privately Held1998https://linkedin.com/company/clickbank
Fastweb logoFastweb
negozi.fastweb.itfastweb.itItalyTelecommunications1001-5000Public Company1999https://linkedin.com/company/fastweb
UOL logoUOL
meupainelhost.uol.com.bruol.com.brBrazilSoftware Development1001-5000Privately Held1996https://linkedin.com/company/uol
Taylor Wimpey logoTaylor Wimpey
taylorwimpey.co.uktaylorwimpey.co.ukUnited KingdomReal Estate1001-5000Public Company1880https://linkedin.com/company/taylor-wimpey
WOM logoWOM
wom.clwom.clChileTelecommunications1001-5000Privately Held2015https://linkedin.com/company/womchile
Thedignityplanner logoThedignityplanner
dignitymemorial.comdignitymemorial.comUnited StatesIndividual and Family Services10001+Public Company1962https://linkedin.com/company/dignitymemorial
TeamSystem S.p.A. logoTeamSystem S.p.A.
teamsystem.comteamsystem.comItalySoftware Development1001-5000Privately Held1979https://linkedin.com/company/teamsystem
Farmaciaindiana logoFarmaciaindiana
farmaciaindiana.com.brfarmaciaindiana.com.brUnited StatesRetail10001+Partnership1958https://linkedin.com/company/farmaciaindiana
Werkenbijamarantgroep logoWerkenbijamarantgroep
amarant.nlamarant.nlNetherlandsHospitals and Health Care5001-10000Nonprofithttps://linkedin.com/company/stgamarant
Bounteous logoBounteous
bounteous.combounteous.comUnited StatesIT Services and IT Consulting501-1000Privately Held2003https://linkedin.com/company/bounteous
STARK Group logoSTARK Group
rationel.stark.dkstark.dkDenmarkWholesale Building Materials10001+Privately Held1896https://linkedin.com/company/stark
Micro Center, Inc. logoMicro Center, Inc.
microcenter.commicrocenter.comUnited StatesRetail1001-5000Privately Held1979https://linkedin.com/company/micro-center
OneTrust LLC logoOneTrust LLC
onetrust.comonetrust.comUnited StatesSoftware Development1001-5000Privately Held2016https://linkedin.com/company/onetrust
Warby Parker logoWarby Parker
warbyparker.comwarbyparker.comUnited StatesRetail Apparel and Fashion1001-5000Public Company2010https://linkedin.com/company/warbyparker
HealthEquity, Inc. logoHealthEquity, Inc.
healthequity.comhealthequity.comUnited StatesFinancial Services1001-5000Public Company2002https://linkedin.com/company/healthequity
Airswift Technology Limited logoAirswift Technology Limited
airswift.comairswift.comUnited StatesStaffing and Recruiting501-1000Privately Held1979https://linkedin.com/company/airswift
Molly Maid LLC. logoMolly Maid LLC.
mollymaid.commollymaid.comUnited StatesConsumer Services1-10Privately Held2016https://linkedin.com/company/service-brands-international
Jabra logoJabra
jabra.comjabra.comDenmarkComputers and Electronics Manufacturing1001-5000Public Company1869https://linkedin.com/company/jabra
Bethany logoBethany
bethany.orgbethany.orgUnited StatesNon-profit Organizations1001-5000Nonprofit1944https://linkedin.com/company/bethany-christian-services

There are 1,665 companies and websites using Convert, sign up to download the entire Convert dataset.

Here are some of the most recognizable companies using Convert and brands using Convert for A/B testing and experimentation in 2026:

  • Adecco – Global staffing and recruiting giant (10,001+ employees) detected using Convert on their CMS subdomain
  • United Airlines – Major US airline using Convert on vacations.united.com for travel package tuning
  • Xerox – Fortune 500 business services company (10,001+ employees) running Convert site-wide
  • HubSpot – Leading marketing automation platform (5,001-10,000 employees) using Convert for testing
  • Pirelli – Italian tire manufacturer (10,001+ employees, founded 1872) detected across Pirelli.com
  • Harvard Business School – Ivy League institution using Convert on hbs.edu for enrollment and program pages
  • Warby Parker – DTC eyewear brand (1,001-5,000 employees, public company) running Convert experiments
  • Nature Conservancy – Environmental nonprofit (5,001-10,000 employees) using Convert on nature.org

These examples span enterprise (Adecco, Xerox, Pirelli), mid-market SaaS (HubSpot), education (Harvard), and DTC retail (Warby Parker), but note that most detections are on subdomains or specific business units, not full-site implementations. For sales teams, this list provides proof points across sectors, but the subdomain pattern suggests Convert is deployed tactically, not strategically.

Which Countries Use Convert the Most?

Which countries use Convert the most? The customer base clusters tightly in three countries. The United States leads at 54.0% (575 of 1,065 enriched companies), followed by the United Kingdom at 11.5% and the Netherlands at 9.3%, per our data at TechnologyChecker.io. Those three countries account for 74.8% of all enriched customers. Australia (3.3%), Canada (3.1%), and Italy (2.4%) round out the top six. The 9.3% Dutch concentration is unusually high for a country of 17 million, it may indicate a regional partnership or early adopter network in the Netherlands.

🇺🇸United States57560.1%
🇬🇧United Kingdom12212.8%
🇳🇱Netherlands9910.4%
🇦🇺Australia353.7%
🇨🇦Canada333.5%
🏳️Italy262.7%
🇩🇪Germany212.2%
🏳️Belgium131.4%
🇧🇷Brazil121.3%
🏳️Denmark111.2%
🇪🇸Spain90.9%

Convert Market Share Among A/B Testing & Experimentation

What is Convert's market share? Convert holds effectively 0% market share in the A/B Testing & Experimentation category, ranking #35 among 39 tracked platforms with just 21 active domains, per TechnologyChecker.io's crawl of 50M+ domains. For context, category leader TruConversion has 2,232 domains (106x more), while newer entrants like Intelligems (999 domains) and Shoplift (667 domains) also eclipse Convert's footprint. The 8,511 previously used count vs. 1,976 active (81.1% cumulative churn) reinforces that companies try Convert but don't stay. Smaller user bases also mean fewer integrations, community resources, and peer proof for prospective buyers.

Customers1.7KCompanies using Convert
Companies Analyzed1.1KWith LinkedIn company data
Category Ranking#35In its category

Top Competitors by Market Share

Convert Customers by Company Size & Age

What size companies use Convert? Convert skews heavily toward small businesses: 35.5% are micro-businesses (1-10 employees) and 25.1% have 11-50 employees. That's 60.6% with fewer than 50 people, per our analysis of 1,065 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. Mid-market companies (51-500) make up 27.9%, while enterprise accounts (1,001+) represent just 7.8%. The 1.1% enterprise penetration (10,001+) is a red flag for larger buyers: you won't find many Fortune 500 peers using this tool. Names like Adecco and Xerox appear in the data, but they're rare exceptions, not representative of the typical customer.

Company Size Distribution

Company Age (Founded Decade)

What Industries Use Convert the Most?

What industries use Convert? Retail leads at 10.1% of enriched companies, followed by Software Development (6.7%), Retail Apparel (4.5%), and Technology/Internet (4.3%), per our data at TechnologyChecker.io. No single vertical dominates, the top 10 industries combined account for just 42.7%, making Convert a genuinely horizontal platform without strong vertical specialization. That cuts both ways for buyers: you won't hit feature gaps if you're outside a core vertical, but you also won't get industry-specific templates, experiment benchmarks, or vertical case studies.

Retail96 (10.12%)
Software Development64 (6.74%)
Retail Apparel and Fashion43 (4.53%)
Technology, Information and Internet41 (4.32%)
Wellness and Fitness Services32 (3.37%)
Manufacturing31 (3.27%)

Convert Alternatives & Competitors

Who are Convert's biggest competitors? The competitive field is crowded. TruConversion leads at 0.52% market share (2,232 domains), followed by SiteSpect (0.28%, 1,215 domains), Intelligems (0.23%, 999 domains), and Zarget (0.21%, 886 domains), per TechnologyChecker.io. Convert itself holds just 21 active domains. All five competitors have 10x-100x more. For Shopify merchants specifically, the market is consolidating around Intelligems and Shoplift, both of which are gaining Convert customers at accelerating rates. For enterprise buyers, the competitive set is different entirely: Optimizely, VWO, and Adobe Target.

TechnologyDomainsMarket Share
A favicon of TruConversion
TruConversion
2,2320.52%
A favicon of SiteSpect
SiteSpect
1,2150.28%
A favicon of Intelligems
Intelligems
9990.23%
A favicon of Zarget
Zarget
8860.21%
A favicon of Google Content Experiments
Google Content Experiments
7980.19%

Convert Customer Migration

Are companies switching to or away from Convert? The migration data isn't encouraging. Based on our enriched data at TechnologyChecker.io, Convert lost 151 customers while gaining just 95. A net negative. The largest outflow goes to Intelligems (90 switches, 48 in the last year) and Shoplift (48 switches, 32 in the last year). Inbound flow came mostly from Google Content Experiments (48, refugees from Google's 2023 sunset) and smaller tools. The acceleration is the key signal: 89% of Intelligems switches happened in the last year, and 67% of Shoplift switches did too. The migration is speeding up, not slowing down.

Switched to Convert
Left Convert
CompetitorGainedLostNet
A favicon of Intelligems
Intelligems
+7
-90
-83
A favicon of Shoplift
Shoplift
+14
-48
-34
A favicon of Google Content Experiments
Google Content Experiments
+48
0
+48
A favicon of Zarget
Zarget
+14
-4
+10
A favicon of TruConversion
TruConversion
+4
-7
-3
A favicon of Split
Split
+6
-1
+5
A favicon of SiteSpect
SiteSpect
+2
-1
+1

Tech Stack of Convert-Powered Websites

What technologies do Convert customers use alongside it? Convert users run a modern, analytics-heavy martech stack, per our enriched data at TechnologyChecker.io. 97.6% use Google Tag Manager, 96.1% Google Analytics, 81.0% GA4, and 93.5% have Facebook integration. These are companies that are serious about tracking and attribution. Infrastructure leans on Cloudflare (74.6%) and CloudFront (48.8%). The 48.1% React adoption alongside 96.0% jQuery suggests a mix of legacy code and modern frameworks. GTM makes platform-switching trivial, just swap the tracking script, which partly explains the high churn.

Analytics & Tracking

A favicon of Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager
1,038 (97.56%)
A favicon of Google Analytics
Google Analytics
1,022 (96.05%)
A favicon of Google Analytics 4
Google Analytics 4
862 (81.02%)
A favicon of Hotjar
Hotjar
502 (47.18%)
A favicon of Microsoft Clarity
Microsoft Clarity
486 (45.68%)

Advertising & Marketing

A favicon of DoubleClick.Net
DoubleClick.Net
1,019 (95.77%)
A favicon of Facebook
Facebook
995 (93.52%)
A favicon of Facebook for Websites
Facebook for Websites
800 (75.19%)
A favicon of Facebook Pixel
Facebook Pixel
732 (68.8%)
A favicon of Google Remarketing
Google Remarketing
739 (69.45%)

Infrastructure & CDN

A favicon of Cloudflare
Cloudflare
794 (74.62%)
A favicon of Cloudflare CDN
Cloudflare CDN
784 (73.68%)
A favicon of CloudFront
CloudFront
519 (48.78%)
A favicon of jsDelivr
jsDelivr
573 (53.85%)
A favicon of cdnjs
cdnjs
528 (49.62%)

Development Frameworks

A favicon of jQuery
jQuery
1,021 (95.96%)
A favicon of React
React
512 (48.12%)
A favicon of core-js
core-js
779 (73.21%)
A favicon of Font Awesome
Font Awesome
579 (54.42%)

Payment Processing

A favicon of PayPal
PayPal
494 (46.43%)
A favicon of Visa
Visa
474 (44.55%)
A favicon of Mastercard
Mastercard
384 (36.09%)

Convert Customer Reviews with Pros and Cons

Based on a small sample of G2 reviews (4 total mentions), Convert receives praise for its modern interface and ease of implementation. The most common criticism relates to missing features and tracking issues. The limited review count makes broad conclusions difficult, but the 81.1% churn rate from our TechnologyChecker.io data tells a more complete story about customer satisfaction than the handful of published reviews.

Generated from real user reviews on G2

Pros
  • Users appreciate the modern interface and the simplicity of implementing Convert Experiences on their pages.(1 reviews)
  • Users appreciate the implementation ease of Convert Experiences, highlighting its modern interface and straightforward setup.(1 reviews)
Cons
  • Users express frustration over the missing features like object rearrangement and limited goal tracking functionalities.(1 reviews)
  • Users face tracking issues with limited goal capabilities and rearranging objects on the page, despite good support.(1 reviews)

Expert Analysis: Convert Growth Trends & Key Signals for Sales Teams in 2026

Emma Davies
Emma DaviesData Analyst, TechnologyChecker

Convert occupies a challenging position in the A/B Testing market, and as of our March 2026 crawl. We're tracking 1,665 total domains with just 21 currently active across 1,065 enriched companies. The data tells a story of a platform that briefly captured attention but couldn't hold it.

Growth Trajectory

Convert's usage history shows a classic boom-bust pattern. The platform launched in 2011 with minimal traction, grew slowly through 2023, then spiked from 504 domains in June 2023 to 1,665 by December 2024. A 230% surge in 18 months. That spike coincided with Google sunsetting Optimize in September 2023, which drove a temporary influx of refugees. But Convert couldn't hold them. Since December 2024, active domains dropped 19.5% to 1,341 by July 2025. The 8,511 previously-used count versus 1,976 currently active gives a 4.3:1 churn ratio, more than four companies have left for every one still running Convert. That's a retention crisis.

Sales Signal: The 230% surge and subsequent 19.5% decline means thousands of companies tried Convert in 2023-2024 and are now actively leaving. Target recent churners, they have A/B testing maturity and budget but need a better platform. The 8,511 churned domains represent a massive prospecting pool for competing tools.

"Convert captured Google Optimize refugees in 2023 but couldn't retain them. The 4.3:1 churn ratio tells you this was a temporary safe harbor, not a destination. Companies tried it, measured the results, and moved on.", Mehmet Suleyman, CEO at TechnologyChecker.io

Customer Profile

The 1,065 enriched companies reveal a heavily SMB customer base. 35.5% have 1-10 employees and 25.1% have 11-50. That's 60.6% with fewer than 50 people. Enterprise accounts (1,001+) represent just 7.8%, and only 1.1% have 10,001+ employees. Names like Adecco, United Airlines, Xerox, and HubSpot appear in the data, but they're exceptions, not the norm. And most enterprise detections are on subdomains (vacations.united.com, coupons.businessinsider.com), suggesting tactical deployment for specific campaigns rather than site-wide experimentation. Company age skews digital-native: 42.5% were founded in the 2010s.

Sales Signal: The 60.6% under-50-employee concentration means Convert customers are price-sensitive and lack dedicated experimentation teams. They'll respond to messaging about ease of setup and transparent pricing. But the 1.1% enterprise rate is a warning for larger buyers: you won't find Fortune 500 peers using this tool.

Industry and Geographic Concentration

Retail leads at 10.1%, followed by Software Development (6.7%), Retail Apparel (4.5%), and Technology/Internet (4.3%). No single vertical dominates, the top 10 industries combined account for just 42.7%, making Convert a genuinely horizontal platform. Geographically, the United States leads at 54.0% (575 companies), with the UK at 11.5% (122) and the Netherlands at 9.3% (99). Those three countries account for 74.8% of all customers. The 9.3% Dutch concentration is unusually high for a country of 17 million, likely indicating a regional partnership or early adopter network.

Sales Signal: The Anglo-Dutch concentration means Convert's support, case studies, and community resources are limited outside these three markets. Buyers in APAC, Latin America, or Eastern Europe should ask about regional support availability before committing.

Migration Patterns

Migration data confirms the retention problem. Convert lost 151 customers while gaining just 95. A net negative. The largest outflows go to Intelligems (90 switches, 48 in the last year) and Shoplift (48 switches, 32 in the last year). Inbound flow came mostly from Google Content Experiments (48, refugees from Google's 2023 sunset) and smaller tools. The acceleration is the critical signal: 89% of Intelligems switches happened in the last year, and 67% of Shoplift switches did too. The migration isn't slowing down. It's speeding up.

Sales Signal: If you're selling against Convert, target Shopify merchants specifically. The 90 switches to Intelligems (a Shopify-native tool) tell us ecommerce businesses want native platform integration over universal A/B testing approaches. Lead with integration depth, not feature breadth.

"89% of Convert-to-Intelligems switches happened in the last year. That acceleration means Convert isn't just losing customers. It's losing them faster every quarter. For competing tools. This is a land-grab opportunity with a closing window.", Mehmet Suleyman, CEO at TechnologyChecker.io

Technology Ecosystem

Convert users run modern, analytics-heavy stacks. 97.6% use Google Tag Manager, 96.1% run Google Analytics, 81.0% have GA4, and 93.5% integrate Facebook. These are measurement-serious companies that understand attribution. Infrastructure leans on Cloudflare (74.6%) and CloudFront (48.8%). The 48.1% React adoption alongside 96.0% jQuery suggests a mix of legacy and modern codebases. Critically, GTM makes platform-switching trivial, just swap the tracking script, which partly explains the high churn. There's virtually no lock-in.

Sales Signal: The 97.6% GTM adoption means switching costs are near zero. Any competing tool that can deploy via GTM can reach Convert's entire customer base with a "swap in 5 minutes" migration pitch. The lack of technical lock-in makes Convert customers perpetually available for competitive displacement.

G2 Review Signals

G2 review data for Convert shows 4 total mentions, limited volume for a testing platform. Users praise modern interface (1 mention) and implementation ease (1 mention). Criticisms focus on missing features (1 mention) and tracking issues (1 mention). The 4-review sample is too small for statistical conclusions, but the 81.1% churn rate from our crawl data tells a more complete customer satisfaction story than G2 reviews can. When four out of five customers leave, the product has a retention problem regardless of what published reviews say.

Sales Signal: The "missing features" criticism aligns with the migration data, companies are leaving for platforms with deeper functionality. If you're competing against Convert, highlight specific feature gaps (Shopify-native integration, revenue attribution, multi-variant testing) rather than generic "we're better" messaging.

Key Takeaways

1. Retention crisis. The 4.3:1 churn ratio and 81.1% cumulative churn rate are among the worst in the A/B testing category.

2. Google Optimize refugees didn't stay. The 2023-2024 spike was temporary. Convert served as a transitional platform, not a destination.

3. Shopify merchants are leaving fastest. 90 switches to Intelligems (89% recent) indicates the ecommerce segment is lost to native alternatives.

4. Zero switching costs. 97.6% GTM adoption means competitors can poach Convert customers with minimal migration friction.

5. SMB-only positioning. 60.6% under 50 employees, 1.1% enterprise. This isn't competing with Optimizely. It's fighting for SMB share against Intelligems and free alternatives.

Sales Applications

Outreach template: "We noticed [Company] runs Convert via Google Tag Manager. With 89% of recent Convert customers switching to native platforms like Intelligems, we wanted to share how [Your Tool] offers [specific feature Convert lacks] with a 5-minute GTM migration."

Targeting strategy: Filter TechnologyChecker.io for Convert + Shopify + Google Tag Manager. These are the highest-probability churners, Shopify merchants with zero switching costs who are likely aware of Intelligems and Shoplift as alternatives.

Competitive angle: Lead with Convert's retention data. The 81.1% churn rate and 8,511 churned domains are powerful proof points. For prospects evaluating Convert, share the migration acceleration data, 89% of Intelligems switches happened in the last year. As evidence of market direction.

Explore the full dataset of 1,665 domains using Convert with enriched profiles for 1,065 companies on TechnologyChecker.io.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who uses Convert?

Convert is used by 1,665 companies worldwide, including Adecco, United Airlines, Xerox Corporation, based on our analysis of 50M+ crawled domains at TechnologyChecker.io. It's particularly popular in the Retail industry (10.12% of customers).

How many customers does Convert have?

Convert has 1,665 active customers detected through our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains. We enriched 1,065 of these with LinkedIn company data on TechnologyChecker.io to generate detailed insights. An additional 8,511 sites that previously used Convert are also tracked.

What is Convert's market share?

Convert's market share in the A/B Testing & Experimentation category is tracked through related detection technologies. With 1,665 detected customers, it is a major player in the category — based on our analysis of 50M+ domains and 40K+ technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.

What are the best alternatives to Convert?

The top alternatives to Convert include TruConversion (0.52% market share), SiteSpect (0.28% market share), Intelligems (0.23% market share), Zarget (0.21% market share) — based on our market share data across 50M+ crawled domains.

Which countries use Convert the most?

United States leads with 575 Convert customers, followed by United Kingdom (122), Netherlands (99), Australia (35), Canada (33), based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.

What size companies use Convert?

The most common company size is 1-10 employees, representing 35.5% of Convert customers, based on our analysis of 1,065 enriched companies. This is followed by 11-50 employees (25.1%) and 51-200 employees (20%).

How old are companies that use Convert?

The majority of Convert customers were founded in the 2010s (42.53%), followed by the 2000s (22.33%), based on our analysis of 1,065 enriched companies. This suggests Convert is most popular among relatively young companies.

What is the ideal customer profile for Convert?

The ideal Convert customer is: Company Size: Small businesses (1-50 employees) represent 60.6% of Convert's customer base, with micro-businesses (1-10) at 35.5% being the largest single segment., Location: United States dominates at 54.0% of enriched companies, followed by United Kingdom (11.5%) and Netherlands (9.3%). Strong Anglo-European concentration., City: No single city dominates — distributed across global metros with concentration in US tech hubs (Boston, Chicago, New York) and European capitals (London, Amsterdam)., Founded: 65.2% of companies were founded in 2000s (22.3%) or 2010s (42.5%) — heavily skewed toward digital-native businesses from the SaaS era., Company Age: Median customer is 10-15 years old. Recent startups (2020s, 8.3%) and legacy enterprises (pre-1990, 18.0%) are underrepresented compared to mid-age digitally mature companies. — based on our analysis of 1,065 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.

What companies are using Convert?

Per TechnologyChecker.io data, 1,976 companies actively use Convert as of early 2026. Notable customers include Adecco (global staffing), United Airlines (vacations.united.com), Xerox, HubSpot, Pirelli, Harvard Business School, and Warby Parker. The customer base skews heavily toward US-based SMBs (60.6% have 1-50 employees) in retail, software development, and ecommerce. Most implementations are on subdomains rather than root domains, which suggests tactical deployment for specific campaigns or business units rather than site-wide experimentation.

Who uses Convert for A/B testing?

Convert's user base is dominated by small to mid-market companies: 35.5% are micro-businesses (1-10 employees), 25.1% have 11-50 employees, and only 7.8% are enterprise-scale (1,001+ employees). Geographically, 54% are US-based, with concentrations in the UK (11.5%) and Netherlands (9.3%). Industry-wise, retail leads at 10.1%, followed by software development (6.7%) and retail apparel (4.5%). The typical user is a digitally mature company founded in the 2010s (42.5% of base) with modern analytics infrastructure (97.6% use Google Tag Manager).

How much does Convert A/B testing cost?

Convert's pricing starts at $399 per month per their website, positioning it in the mid-tier range for A/B testing tools. The platform offers flat-rate, all-in-one plans with monthly billing and no forced upgrades. However, the 81.1% churn rate (8,511 previously used vs 1,976 active) suggests that while entry pricing is accessible. Many customers don't renew long-term. Buyers should ask about contract terms, volume-based pricing tiers, and renewal rates by cohort to understand total cost of ownership beyond the initial $399/month entry point.

What is Convert used for?

Convert Experiences is an A/B testing and experimentation platform for conversion rate improvement. Based on customer data. It's most commonly deployed for tactical testing on subdomains (landing pages, campaign microsites, product pages) rather than full-site experimentation. The 97.6% overlap with Google Tag Manager and 96.1% with Google Analytics shows users integrate it into broader measurement stacks. Common use cases based on industry distribution include ecommerce product page testing (retail 10.1%), SaaS landing page refinement (software 6.7%), and DTC checkout flow experiments (apparel 4.5%).

Is Convert.com legit and reliable?

Convert is a legitimate A/B testing platform, but the data raises reliability concerns. The platform has an 81.1% cumulative churn rate (8,511 sites have left vs 1,976 active), and usage has declined 19.5% from its December 2024 peak to July 2025. Migration data shows 90 customers switched to Intelligems and 48 to Shoplift in recent periods, suggesting retention issues. The platform briefly captured Google Optimize refugees in 2023 (48 inbound migrations) but couldn't hold them. For buyers, request customer retention metrics, contract renewal rates, and references from companies who've used the platform for 2+ years before committing.

What are the alternatives to Convert?

Top alternatives by market share include TruConversion (0.52%, 2,232 domains), SiteSpect (0.28%, 1,215 domains), Intelligems (0.23%, 999 domains), and Zarget (0.21%, 886 domains). Migration data shows Intelligems is the primary destination for Convert customers (90 switches, 48 in the last year), particularly Shopify merchants who prefer the native integration. TruConversion captured 7 switches, while Shoplift (48 switches) is popular among ecommerce brands. For enterprise buyers, consider Optimizely or VWO. For SMBs, evaluate Intelligems (Shopify-native) or TruConversion (broader feature set) alongside Convert.

Why are companies switching from Convert to Intelligems?

Migration data shows 90 companies switched from Convert to Intelligems, with 48 (53.3%) in the last year alone. The primary driver appears to be Shopify integration, Intelligems is Shopify-native, offering deeper platform integration, automatic revenue tracking, and built-in analytics that eliminate the need for separate tracking scripts. Given that 10.1% of Convert customers are in retail (often Shopify merchants), the native alternative is more compelling than a universal tool. The acceleration (89% of switches in the last year) suggests Intelligems' product matured recently, making it a viable alternative for Shopify users who previously had few options.

What is the difference between Convert and TruConversion?

TruConversion is the market leader in the A/B Testing & Experimentation category with 2,232 domains (0.52% market share) vs Convert's 21 domains (0%). TruConversion offers an all-in-one analytics and feedback suite (heatmaps, session recordings, surveys, funnels) alongside A/B testing, while Convert focuses primarily on experimentation. Migration data shows minimal flow between the two (4 sites switched from Convert to TruConversion), suggesting they target different buyer profiles. TruConversion's broader feature set appeals to teams wanting a bundled CRO platform, while Convert positions as a focused testing tool. Pricing and feature depth differ, evaluate both based on whether you need multi-tool CRO or dedicated testing.

How many companies have stopped using Convert?

TechnologyChecker.io data shows 8,511 domains have previously used Convert but are no longer active, compared to 1,976 currently active installations. That's an 81.1% cumulative churn rate, more than four churned sites for every active one. Recent migration data reinforces the trend: 151 customers left (90 to Intelligems, 48 to Shoplift, 7 to TruConversion) while only 95 joined (48 from Google Content Experiments, 14 from Shoplift, 14 from Zarget). The net loss of 56 customers from a tiny base suggests ongoing retention challenges. For buyers, this high churn rate warrants investigation. Ask Convert for customer retention metrics by cohort and contract renewal rates.

What industries use Convert the most?

Retail leads at 10.1% of enriched companies (96 of 948), followed by software development (6.7%, 64 companies), retail apparel and fashion (4.5%, 43 companies), and technology/internet (4.3%, 41 companies). Wellness and fitness services (3.4%), manufacturing (3.3%), and financial services (3.1%) show meaningful adoption, while travel arrangements (1.8%) and advertising services (2.2%) round out the top 10. No single industry dominates, the top 10 combined account for just 42.7%, making Convert a horizontal platform without deep vertical specialization. This means fewer industry-specific templates, benchmarks, or case studies compared to vertically focused competitors.

Is Convert suitable for enterprise companies?

The data suggests no. Only 7.8% of Convert customers are enterprise-scale (1,001+ employees), and just 1.1% are Fortune 500 size (10,001+). Enterprise names like Adecco, United Airlines, and Xerox appear in the customer list, but most detections are on subdomains (specific business units or campaign microsites), not root domains. The 60.6% SMB concentration (1-50 employees) indicates the platform's product roadmap, support model, and pricing are enhanced for small businesses, not complex multi-team organizations. Enterprise buyers should request references from companies their size in their industry, the data shows they're rare. For large organizations, evaluate Optimizely, VWO, or Adobe Target instead.

What countries have the most Convert users?

United States dominates at 54.0% of enriched companies (575 of 1,065), followed by the United Kingdom at 11.5% (122 companies) and the Netherlands at 9.3% (99 companies). Those three countries account for 74.8% of all customers. Australia (3.3%), Canada (3.1%), and Italy (2.4%) round out the top six. The Anglo-Dutch concentration suggests limited localized support, regional case studies, and geo-specific compliance features outside these markets. For buyers in APAC, LatAM, or Eastern Europe, ask about SLA coverage during local business hours, whether pricing is in local currency, and whether the platform supports regional data residency requirements.

How long do companies typically use Convert before switching?

While the raw data doesn't provide exact tenure metrics, the usage history and migration patterns offer clues. Convert peaked at 1,665 domains in December 2024, then dropped 19.5% to 1,341 by July 2025 (7 months). The 90 switches to Intelligems (48 in the last year) and 48 to Shoplift (32 in the last year) suggest accelerating churn. The 8,511 previously used count vs 10,487 total ever detected means 81.1% of all sites that tried Convert have left. For buyers, this pattern suggests many customers trial the platform (possibly on 3-6 month contracts) but don't renew long-term. Request cohort retention data from Convert, what percentage of customers who start in year 1 are still active in year 3?

What is Convert's market share in A/B testing?

Convert holds 0% market share in the A/B Testing & Experimentation category with just 21 active domains, ranking #35 out of 39 tracked platforms per TechnologyChecker.io data. For context, category leader TruConversion has 2,232 domains (0.52% share), SiteSpect has 1,215 (0.28%), and Intelligems has 999 (0.23%). Convert's footprint is 106x smaller than TruConversion's and 48x smaller than Intelligems'. The tiny market share means fewer integrations, community resources, third-party tools, and peer proof. It also correlates with higher platform risk, vendors with minimal adoption are more likely to pivot, get acquired, or shut down. For buyers, low market share should trigger due diligence on vendor stability and product roadmap.

Does Convert integrate with Shopify?

While Convert offers Shopify integration via tracking scripts and GTM, the migration data shows it's not competitive with Shopify-native alternatives. 90 companies switched from Convert to Intelligems (a Shopify-native A/B testing app), with 48 switches in the last year alone. This suggests Shopify merchants prefer platforms built specifically for their environment, with native revenue tracking, automatic integration, and Shopify-specific templates. If you're evaluating A/B testing for Shopify, the data strongly suggests starting with Intelligems or Shoplift (48 inbound migrations) before considering universal tools like Convert. The 10.1% retail customer concentration (many likely Shopify users) shows Convert has some ecommerce traction, but the outbound migration rate is alarming.

Convert Overview
Customers
1,665
Companies Analyzed
1,065
Category Rank
#35
Top Country
United States
Top Industry
Retail
Convert Customer ICP

Based on 1,065 company data

Company Size
Small businesses (1-50 employees) represent 60.6% of Convert's customer base, with micro-businesses (1-10) at 35.5% being the largest single segment.
Location
United States dominates at 54.0% of enriched companies, followed by United Kingdom (11.5%) and Netherlands (9.3%). Strong Anglo-European concentration.
City
No single city dominates — distributed across global metros with concentration in US tech hubs (Boston, Chicago, New York) and European capitals (London, Amsterdam).
Founded
65.2% of companies were founded in 2000s (22.3%) or 2010s (42.5%) — heavily skewed toward digital-native businesses from the SaaS era.
Company Age
Median customer is 10-15 years old. Recent startups (2020s, 8.3%) and legacy enterprises (pre-1990, 18.0%) are underrepresented compared to mid-age digitally mature companies.
About Our Data

These insights include all TechnologCchecker.io detections of Convert (free & paid plans).

Total Detections2.08B
Detection History+20 Years
Domains Crawled29.6M
Technologies44K+
Company Match Rate31.6%