Companies Using TeamViewer

This is a list of organisations that verified a domain for TeamViewer SSO, not a list of TeamViewer users

Almost every number on this page follows from one detail about how a domain got here. Our rule for TeamViewer offers two ways in: a teamviewer-sso-verification TXT record in DNS, or the Monitis real user monitoring script on a crawled page. We took a random sample of 30 matched domains and resolved each one. All 30 carried a live teamviewer-sso-verification record, and none matched on the Monitis script. In practice, then, this page counts exactly one thing: organisations that proved they control a domain so they could configure TeamViewer Single Sign-On.

That is narrower than TeamViewer usage, and it is worth being precise about the gap. TeamViewer is installed software. A support technician running the client on a laptop, an unattended host on a factory floor, a small firm on a handful of licences: none of them touch DNS, and none of them appear here. Domain-verified Single Sign-On is something an organisation configures when it already has an identity provider and enough staff to justify wiring another application into it. So 7,114 is a floor on TeamViewer's footprint, not a total, and the direction of the error is known. This measurement can only undercount.

What the record does prove is specific and useful. Somebody with authority over that domain's DNS zone completed an enterprise setup step for TeamViewer. What it does not prove is anything about scale or currency. There is no seat count in a TXT record, no plan tier, no last login. It also does not expire on its own, so a record published years ago still resolves today whether or not the contract renewed.

7,114 is a good answer to how many organisations have domain-verified TeamViewer Single Sign-On. It is a poor answer to how many companies use TeamViewer, and the second question is the one people usually mean when they ask.

The category is wrong, and the rank is still worth publishing

TechnologyChecker.io files TeamViewer in APM & Error Tracking, where it ranks 14th of 58 on 0.28% share. That is the wrong shelf for the product, and the reason sits in the second clause of the detection rule. TeamViewer acquired Monitis, an uptime and real user monitoring product, and the technology record inherited Monitis's category. TeamViewer Single Sign-On is remote access and identity. It does not compete with application error tracking, and a buyer evaluating it is not also evaluating Sentry.

So read the competitor table as what it is: the largest rows in the same taxonomy bucket, not a shortlist. Sentry holds 1,851,998 domains and 71.99% of the category, New Relic 226,775 and 8.81%, Datadog 148,622 and 5.78%, with Boomerang on 52,708 and BugSnag on 51,398. All of those are found by reading a JavaScript file out of a page we crawled, a surface almost every public website exposes. TeamViewer is found by resolving one DNS record an organisation publishes once and forgets. Dividing the second population by the first produces 0.28%, and that figure is arithmetic rather than a market position. We publish it because it is the data we hold, and because quietly dropping an inconvenient number is worse than explaining what it is.

The buyer is large, old, and has equipment in places

The size curve is where this page earns its keep for anyone prospecting the base. 1,434 of the 6,365 companies with a headcount on file, 22.53%, employ 1,001 to 5,000 people, and that is the largest single band. Most profiles on this site peak at 1-10 or 11-50, because most detectable technologies are things a small company puts on a website. This one peaks four bands higher. Above 1,000 employees the total is 2,221 companies, 34.89%; below 50 it is 1,078, 16.94%. That is a direct consequence of the marker. Single Sign-On is an organisational capability, and organisations that do not run one cannot produce this record at all.

The age distribution agrees with the size distribution. 1,306 of the 4,997 companies with a founding year, 26.14%, predate 1960, and 2,026, 40.54%, were founded before 1980, while the 2020s are the smallest bucket at 192, 3.84%. The industry table then refuses to concentrate at all: IT Services and IT Consulting leads on 395 of the 6,245 companies with a recorded industry, only 6.33%, and the ten labels shown cover just 2,108 companies, 33.76%, between them.

Where the industries do cluster is the useful part. Construction, Machinery Manufacturing, Transportation and Logistics, Motor Vehicle Manufacturing and Wholesale Building Materials sum to 769 companies, 12.31% of the 6,245, close to double the largest single label. Those are organisations whose equipment sits in plants, depots, vehicles and customer premises, and remote access is how somebody reaches a machine they cannot walk to. Ford, BMW Group, Baker Hughes and CEVA Logistics are all on the named list. If you are building a target account list from this page, that cluster is the segment where the product story writes itself.

Geography finishes the picture. The United States takes 1,966 of the 6,410 placed companies, 30.67%, which is low for a SaaS profile here, where the US usually clears half. Germany, Switzerland and Austria together take 1,280, 19.97%, roughly two thirds of the US figure. TeamViewer is a Göppingen company and the base still shows it. A completely independent signal agrees: TYPO3 CMS, a content management system whose market is overwhelmingly German-speaking, appears on 384 of the 7,282 live domains, 5.27%, which is a long way above what a random sample of enterprise websites would produce.

Under 1% churn is a fact about DNS, and it is why there is no migration table

73 domains have dropped the TeamViewer record since we began tracking in March 2026, 0.99% of the 7,347 domains we have ever seen carrying it. On most profiles a figure under 1% would be worth calling stickiness. Here it is not, and the distinction matters. The 73 drops spread across 12 weeks with no burst, the largest single week accounting for 17 of them, which is steady low-level attrition rather than a cancellation event.

A TXT record costs nothing to keep, breaks nothing when it goes stale, and is invisible to everyone except a resolver. Nobody opens a DNS zone to tidy up after a contract lapses. So a lapsed organisation usually keeps its record and keeps being counted, which means 0.99% measures the persistence of the record rather than loyalty to the vendor.

Near-zero churn on a verification record is a statement about DNS housekeeping. It is not a retention rate, and reading it as one will flatter every vendor measured this way.

That property is also why there is no migration section on this page. We took all 73 dropped domains and ran the destination query against the other 57 technologies in the category. The largest single destination was 5 domains, and every one of those five was already running that script-detected monitoring tool before the TeamViewer record went away, so nothing was replaced by anything. No destination cleared its own base rate among TeamViewer's live domains. A corridor has to survive that test before it is worth printing, none did, and so we publish nothing rather than dress up noise as a switching trend.

One block of the stack table is comparable, the rest is not

The co-occurrence table has one group that can be read next to TeamViewer's own number and several that cannot, and holding that distinction is the difference between a useful read and a wrong one. The group headed Verified SaaS Accounts on the Same Domains is made of products detected in exactly the way TeamViewer is, as a verification record in the domain's DNS. Atlassian appears on 3,146 of the 7,282 live domains, 43.2%; DocuSign on 1,832, 25.16%; Miro on 1,148, 15.76%; Zoom on 958, 13.16%; Smartsheet on 793, 10.89%; Jamf on 718, 9.86%; and Webex on 712, 9.78%. Same surface, same kind of evidence, same denominator. A company that verified a domain for one of those made the same kind of decision, in the same system, and left the same kind of trace.

The other groups are different in kind. WordPress at 2,697 domains, 37.04%, OneTrust at 1,482, 20.35%, and Salesforce at 1,181, 16.22% come from crawling the organisation's public website, because a DNS match sends the crawler to the homepage. They describe a marketing site built by a team that has nothing to do with the one that configured Single Sign-On. Useful for qualifying an account, useless for inferring what TeamViewer sits alongside operationally. And one denominator note that governs the whole table: every percentage in it divides by the 7,282 domains our live crawl currently answers for, not by the 7,114 in the August rollup. The two sets differ because the rollup is a monthly snapshot while the live set moves, so never take an overlap count from this table and divide it by the headline number.

For anyone deciding whether to prospect this base, the summary is short. It is small, it is honest about what it contains, and it is biased toward exactly the accounts worth calling: every row is an organisation that runs central identity, has the headcount to need it, and put TeamViewer inside it. What the list cannot tell you is how many seats sit behind each domain or whether the contract is still live. Treat it as a qualified starting set from TechnologyChecker.io, verify currency separately, and remember that the companies missing from it are not companies that have no TeamViewer.