Companies Using Network for Good
Our October 2026 crawl finds Network for Good donation pages linked from 3,690 live domains. Network for Good is the fundraising software Bonterra now sells, and its users are mostly small American nonprofits: 64.32% of matched organisations have 1 to 10 staff and 95.36% are in the United States. Below is the list of companies that use Network for Good, with size and sector for each. It includes Pew Research Center, National PTA, the National Democratic Institute and the Animal Medical Center in New York.
We count a site when it links to a giving page on networkforgood.com or loads a Network for Good script, so this is mostly a count of Donate links. In a random sample of 80 domains, 60 of the 64 that showed a link were raising money for themselves, on their own account or a parent body's or fiscal sponsor's; 4 linked someone else's page. Network for Good ranks 9th of the 54 technologies we track in Donations & Fundraising, with a 3.08% share.
Published Oct 11, 2026 · Updated Oct 14, 2026 · Data analysed on October 11, 2026.
Network for Good Usage Statistics
Network for Good reads 3,307 domains in June 2026, 3,506 in July, 3,539 in August, 3,686 in September and 3,690 in October. Part of that rise is ours: the domains we crawl turn over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly found ones added, and our detection widened over the same months. Since tracking began in March 2026, 396 domains dropped it from at least one hostname, and 38 of those still link it from another. A Donate link costs nothing to keep, but it disappears when a site is rebuilt.
List of Companies Using Network for Good
Download all 3,690 Network for Good customers with full company data, or create a signal to track when companies start or stop using Network for Good.
| Company | Detection URL | Domain | Country | Industry | Employees | Type | Founded | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ccsgc.org | ccsgc.org | United States | Mental Health Care | 51-200 | Nonprofit | 1941 | https://linkedin.com/company/catholic-charities | |
| magnetpathwaycon.nursingworld.org | nursingworld.org | United States | Non-profit Organizations | 51-200 | Nonprofit | — | https://linkedin.com/company/american-nurses-association | |
| nef.nisdtx.org | nisdtx.org | United States | Education Administration Programs | 1001-5000 | Educational | — | https://linkedin.com/company/northwest-isd | |
| storefront.nahb.org | nahb.org | United States | Construction | 201-500 | Nonprofit | 1942 | https://linkedin.com/company/national-association-of-home-builders | |
| www.sevenhills.org | sevenhills.org | United States | Individual and Family Services | 1001-5000 | Nonprofit | 1951 | https://linkedin.com/company/seven-hills-foundation | |
| wallacecenter.winrock.org | winrock.org | United States | Non-profit Organizations | 501-1000 | Nonprofit | 1985 | https://linkedin.com/company/winrock-international | |
| ndi.org | ndi.org | United States | International Affairs | 1001-5000 | Nonprofit | 1983 | https://linkedin.com/company/national-democratic-institute-ndi | |
| institute.org | institute.org | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 1001-5000 | Nonprofit | 1983 | https://linkedin.com/company/institute-for-family-health | |
| schoolhouse.world | schoolhouse.world | United States | E-Learning Providers | 1-10 | Nonprofit | 2020 | https://linkedin.com/company/schoolhouse-world | |
| lindsey.edu | lindsey.edu | United States | Higher Education | 201-500 | Educational | 1903 | https://linkedin.com/company/lindsey-wilson-college |
Show 39 more Network for Good using companies as demo data
| Company | Detection URL | Country | Industry | Employees | Type | Founded | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| atlantatech.edu | atlantatech.edu | United States | Higher Education | 201-500 | Educational | — | https://linkedin.com/company/atlanta-technical-college | |
| epath.org | epath.org | United States | Non-profit Organizations | 1001-5000 | Nonprofit | 1984 | https://linkedin.com/company/people-assisting-the-homeless-path | |
| mef.usd266.com | usd266.com | United States | Primary and Secondary Education | 501-1000 | Educational | 1966 | https://linkedin.com/company/maize-usd-266 | |
| lssny.org | lssny.org | United States | Non-profit Organization Management | 501-1000 | Nonprofit | 1886 | https://linkedin.com/company/lutheran-social-services-of-new-york | |
| www.stavros.org | stavros.org | United States | — | 1-10 | — | — | https://linkedin.com/company/stavros-center-for-ind-lvg | |
| secumd.org | secumd.org | United States | Financial Services | 501-1000 | Nonprofit | 1951 | https://linkedin.com/company/secumd | |
| heywood.org | heywood.org | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 1001-5000 | Nonprofit | 1907 | https://linkedin.com/company/heywoodhealthcare | |
| stnicksalliance.org | stnicksalliance.org | United States | Non-profit Organizations | 1001-5000 | Nonprofit | 1976 | https://linkedin.com/company/st-nicks-alliance | |
| odysseyhousenyc.org | odysseyhousenyc.org | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 201-500 | Nonprofit | 1967 | https://linkedin.com/company/odyssey-house_2 | |
| amcny.org | amcny.org | United States | Veterinary | 201-500 | Nonprofit | 1910 | https://linkedin.com/company/the-animal-medical-center | |
| bhs-inc.org | bhs-inc.org | United States | Non-profit Organizations | 51-200 | Nonprofit | — | https://linkedin.com/company/behavioral-health-services-inc | |
| www.ghctk12.com | ghctk12.com | United States | Education Administration Programs | 201-500 | Educational | 1960 | https://linkedin.com/company/granada-hills-charter | |
| www.jocombs.org | jocombs.org | United States | Education Administration Programs | 501-1000 | Educational | 1958 | https://linkedin.com/company/j-o--combs-unified-school-district | |
| showmeaction.org | showmeaction.org | United States | Public Policy Offices | 201-500 | Nonprofit | 1965 | https://linkedin.com/company/central-missouri-community-action | |
| www.elbuen.org | elbuen.org | United States | Wellness and Fitness Services | 51-200 | Nonprofit | 1987 | https://linkedin.com/company/elbuenaustin | |
| clothesforkids.org | clothesforkids.org | United States | Individual and Family Services | 1-10 | Nonprofit | 1984 | https://linkedin.com/company/clothes-for-kids | |
| lamaestra.org | lamaestra.org | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 501-1000 | Nonprofit | 1990 | https://linkedin.com/company/la-maestra-community-health-centers | |
| solidaritycenter.org | solidaritycenter.org | United States | Non-profit Organizations | 201-500 | Nonprofit | 1996 | https://linkedin.com/company/solidarity-center | |
| optimushealthcare.org | optimushealthcare.org | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 501-1000 | Privately Held | 1976 | https://linkedin.com/company/optimus-health-care | |
| donate.mdlab.org | mdlab.org | United States | Law Practice | 201-500 | Nonprofit | 1911 | https://linkedin.com/company/marylandlegalaid | |
| acds.org | acds.org | United States | Non-profit Organizations | 201-500 | Nonprofit | 1967 | https://linkedin.com/company/acdsny | |
| tre.org | tre.org | United States | Individual and Family Services | 201-500 | Nonprofit | 1964 | https://linkedin.com/company/the-resource-exchange | |
| cctech.edu | cctech.edu | United States | Higher Education | 1-10 | Educational | — | https://linkedin.com/company/central-carolina-technical-college | |
| goapace.com | goapace.com | United States | Individual and Family Services | 501-1000 | Nonprofit | 1972 | https://linkedin.com/company/go-apace | |
| commbasedservices.org | commbasedservices.org | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 201-500 | Nonprofit | 1981 | https://linkedin.com/company/community-based-services | |
| pta.org | pta.org | United States | Non-profit Organizations | 51-200 | Nonprofit | 1897 | https://linkedin.com/company/national-pta | |
| www.pewresearch.org | pewresearch.org | United States | Think Tanks | 51-200 | Nonprofit | 2004 | https://linkedin.com/company/pew-research-center | |
| www.centennialsd.org | centennialsd.org | United States | Primary and Secondary Education | 501-1000 | Nonprofit | 1727 | https://linkedin.com/company/centennialsd | |
| csh.org | csh.org | United States | Non-profit Organizations | 51-200 | Nonprofit | 1991 | https://linkedin.com/company/corporation-for-supportive-housing | |
| www.nsna.org | nsna.org | United States | Higher Education | 11-50 | Nonprofit | 1952 | https://linkedin.com/company/national-student-nurses'-association | |
| heavenlypets.org | heavenlypets.org | United States | Non-profit Organizations | 11-50 | Nonprofit | 2000 | https://linkedin.com/company/perrys-place-la | |
| neighborhoodhealthva.org | neighborhoodhealthva.org | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 201-500 | Nonprofit | 1997 | https://linkedin.com/company/alexandria-neighborhood-health-services-inc. | |
| cfcaps.org | cfcaps.org | United States | Primary and Secondary Education | 201-500 | Nonprofit | 2017 | https://linkedin.com/company/cf-caps | |
| jaynolan.org | jaynolan.org | United States | Individual and Family Services | 501-1000 | Nonprofit | 1975 | https://linkedin.com/company/jay-nolan-community-services | |
| www.eastersealscrossroads.org | eastersealscrossroads.org | United States | Non-profit Organization Management | 51-200 | Nonprofit | 1938 | https://linkedin.com/company/easter-seals-crossroads | |
| summitpacificmedicalcenter.org | summitpacificmedicalcenter.org | United States | Hospitals and Health Care | 201-500 | Nonprofit | 1956 | https://linkedin.com/company/summit-pacific-medical-center | |
| www.vanderheyden.org | vanderheyden.org | United States | Individual and Family Services | 201-500 | Nonprofit | 1833 | https://linkedin.com/company/vanderheydeninc | |
| www.interaction.org | interaction.org | United States | Public Policy Offices | 51-200 | Nonprofit | 1984 | https://linkedin.com/company/interaction | |
| www.gatewayscs.org | gatewayscs.org | United States | Individual and Family Services | 501-1000 | Nonprofit | 1981 | https://linkedin.com/company/gateways-community-services |
There are 3,690 companies and domains where we detect Network for Good, sign up to download the entire Network for Good dataset.
Here are some of the recognisable companies that use Network for Good in 2026. Each linked its own Network for Good giving page when we checked it in October 2026:
- Pew Research Center: on www.pewresearch.org
- National PTA: a monthly-donor page linked from pta.org
- National Democratic Institute: on ndi.org
- National Association of Home Builders: a Donate link on its online store
- Animal Medical Center: the New York animal hospital, on amcny.org
- InterAction: the alliance of US international NGOs, on www.interaction.org
- Solidarity Center: the worker-rights organisation, on solidaritycenter.org
- Winrock International: on its Wallace Center site
- Easterseals Crossroads: on www.eastersealscrossroads.org
- Lutheran Social Services of New York: on lssny.org
Which Countries Use Network for Good the Most?
Which countries use Network for Good the most? Almost only the United States: 2,962 of the 3,106 matched organisations (95.36%). No other country reaches ten. Kenya has 7, Canada 5, and the United Kingdom, Costa Rica, France and India 3 each. Qgiv's profile is just as American (3,696 of 3,829), while Fundraise Up's base is 69.16% American, with sizeable Canadian and British groups.
Share of the 3,106 Network for Good domains we matched to a company record — 84.2% of the 3,690 we detect. Top 15 countries shown, so these do not sum to 100%. Domains with no matching company record are not represented here and skew small and independent.
Network for Good Market Share Among Donations & Fundraising
What is Network for Good's market share? 3.08% of Donations & Fundraising, 9th of the 54 technologies we track there, based on 3,690 live domains at TechnologyChecker.io. Qgiv (3.8%) sits two places above and Donorbox (5.85%) further up. Both are counted the same way, by links or scripts, so they're the fair comparisons. GiveWP's 27.38% counts an installed WordPress plugin, which answers a different question.
Top Competitors by Market Share
Network for Good Customers by Company Size & Age
What size organisations use Network for Good? Small ones. 64.32% of matched organisations with a known size have 1 to 10 employees and 24.42% have 11 to 50, so 88.74% have 50 or fewer, which is the market Bonterra pitches it at. Only 15 have more than 1,000 staff, and several large names link from one corner of their site, such as a foundation page, a conference site or an online store.
Company Size Distribution
Company Age (Founded Decade)
The largest group was founded in the 2010s (31.29%), then the 2000s (20.94%), so 58.94% date from 2000 or later, against 50.21% of Fundraise Up's matched organisations. Few are brand new, though. Only 6.71% were founded in the 2020s, where Donorbox's profile shows 26.59%, and 7.47% date from before 1960.
What Industries Use Network for Good the Most?
Non-profit Organizations leads at 32.1%, then Civic and Social Organizations (7.39%), Non-profit Organization Management (6.89%) and Individual and Family Services (6.64%), based on our enriched company data. No other label passes 3.3%. Schools are a visible second market: Education Administration Programs (2.56%) and Primary and Secondary Education (2.41%) add up to 4.97%, and Performing Arts (2.31%) makes the top ten.
Schools using Network for Good include Granada Hills Charter, the J.O. Combs Unified School District and the education foundations of Northwest ISD in Texas and Maize USD 266. Health providers on Network for Good include La Maestra Community Health Centers, the Institute for Family Health and Odyssey House in New York. Research and policy groups using Network for Good include Pew Research Center, the National Democratic Institute and InterAction.
Network for Good Alternatives & Competitors
Qgiv and Donorbox are the like-for-like rivals, counted by links and scripts as Network for Good is, and plenty of sites carry two tools. 60 Network for Good domains also run GiveWP today, 51 run Qgiv and 20 run Donorbox. None of these pairs passes our switching tests: of the 87 domains ever seen with Network for Good and Qgiv, 51 still have both, and for GiveWP it's 60 of 75.
Network for Good Customer Migration
Tech Stack of Network for Good-Powered Websites
Across the 3,699 live Network for Good domains in our stack base, WordPress runs on 50.58%, but hosted builders are common: Squarespace on 17.38%, Wix on 13.14% and GoDaddy's builder on 5.0%. Payment tags are rare (PayPal 2.08%, Stripe 1.6%), which fits a giving page hosted on Network for Good's side. CRM tags are rarer still, Salesforce on 1.03% and Neon CRM on 0.43%.
CMS & Website Builders
Payment Processing
Web Analytics
Email Marketing
CRM
Network for Good Customer Reviews with Pros and Cons
Based on aggregated G2 reviews (112 total mentions), Network for Good scores highest for ease of use. The most common criticism relates to confusing features.
Generated from real user reviews on G2
- Users commend the ease of use of Bonterra Network for Good, finding navigation and donation processes straightforward and intuitive.(25 reviews)
- Users highlight the comprehensive CRM and campaign management features of Bonterra Network for Good that streamline donor engagement.(18 reviews)
- Users value the efficient donor management features of Bonterra Network for Good, enhancing communication and tracking for better engagement.(15 reviews)
- Users commend Bonterra Network for Good's exceptional customer support, noting responsiveness and genuine investment in user success.(14 reviews)
- Users value the efficient donations management of Bonterra Network for Good, simplifying tracking and donor communication.(13 reviews)
- Users find the confusing features of Bonterra Network for Good hinder their ability to utilize the platform effectively.(6 reviews)
- Users feel that the limited customization of Bonterra Network for Good's templates restricts their creative options.(6 reviews)
- Users find the missing features of Bonterra restrictive, hindering their ability to effectively track and report on donors.(6 reviews)
- Users find the high fees for Bonterra Network for Good burdensome, especially for small organizations and non-profits.(5 reviews)
- Users face a difficult setup process for Bonterra, requiring extensive trial and error to customize effectively.(4 reviews)
Expert Analysis: Network for Good Growth Trends & Key Signals for Sales Teams in 2026

Network for Good is counted differently from most tools on our pages. Our rule fires when a page links to a giving page on networkforgood.com or loads a Network for Good script, and on a small nonprofit's website that link is usually the Donate button. Our October 2026 crawl finds it on 3,690 live domains, and 3,106 of them, 84.18%, matched to an organisation. Before writing about those organisations I checked what the links point at.
What a link tells you
I opened 80 live domains at random in a browser. 15 blocked us or timed out, and one no longer showed a link. Of the 64 that showed a link or form, 51 pointed at the site's own Network for Good account, usually a page like racsjc.networkforgood.com for racsjc.org. Nine pointed at a parent body's or fiscal sponsor's account that runs the site's own campaign, such as a youth summit raising money through its conservation sponsor. Four pointed at someone else: a shopping mall advertising a charity's golf day, a school PTA running a drive for a food bank, a festival sending visitors to its beneficiary, and a private equity firm linking to Network for Good's homepage. 17 of the 64 also linked a Network for Good form, mostly newsletter sign-ups, and 2 embedded a donation form in the page.
Sales signal: 60 of 64 linked domains (93.75%) are raising money for themselves through Network for Good. The rest are noise, and the link's subdomain tells you which is which.
A flat line with a steady leak
The usage chart reads 3,307 domains in June 2026, 3,506 in July, 3,539 in August, 3,686 in September and 3,690 in October. Some of that rise is ours: the set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly found ones added, and our detection widened over the same months. The exits are cleaner to read. Since March 2026, 396 domains dropped Network for Good from at least one hostname, equal to 10.73% of today's count, and 38 of them still link it from another hostname. A Donate link costs nothing to keep, but it vanishes when a site is rebuilt, so that number mixes nonprofits that left with sites that were redesigned.
"Nearly two in three Network for Good organisations have ten staff or fewer, and 95% are American. This is the small US nonprofit's donation page." - Emma Davies, Data Analyst at TechnologyChecker.io
Sales signal: the base is flat at about 3,700 domains with a few hundred exits since March. A site redesign is the moment a small nonprofit reconsiders its Donate button, so a fresh rebuild is a better trigger than any growth story.
Small, American and mostly young
64.32% of matched organisations with a known size have 1 to 10 employees and 24.42% have 11 to 50, so 88.74% have 50 or fewer. Only 15 have more than 1,000 staff. That's a smaller base than Qgiv's (55.1% at 1 to 10) or Fundraise Up's (44.97%), though not as small as Donorbox's (75.32%). It's also American: 2,962 of 3,106 matched organisations (95.36%) are in the US, and no other country reaches ten. By founding date, 58.94% date from 2000 or later, led by the 2010s (31.29%), but only 6.71% are from the 2020s.
Sales signal: with 88.74% at 50 staff or fewer, the buyer is usually an executive director or a lone development officer. Products that save them time, or come with a person to call, fit this list better than anything that needs a database administrator.
Who they are
Non-profit Organizations leads the industry labels at 32.1%, then Civic and Social Organizations (7.39%), Non-profit Organization Management (6.89%) and Individual and Family Services (6.64%). Schools are a visible second market. The two education labels add up to 4.97%, and the list includes Granada Hills Charter, the J.O. Combs Unified School District and the education foundations of Northwest ISD and Maize USD 266. Health providers (3.23%) include La Maestra Community Health Centers and the Institute for Family Health. The best-known names often link from one corner of a large site: NAHB from its online store, the American Nurses Association from a conference site to its foundation's page, Winrock International from its Wallace Center site.
Sales signal: school districts and their education foundations are a distinct segment with their own budget calendar. For the national names, start with the team that owns the linked page.
Second tools on the same site
No pair passes our switching tests, so the page shows no migration table. We do see overlap. 60 Network for Good domains also run GiveWP, 51 run Qgiv and 20 run Donorbox. Qgiv is the closest match, a hosted donation page for small US nonprofits that we count by link or script the same way, and of the 87 domains we've ever seen with both, 51 still carry both today. A second donation tool gets added more often than it replaces the first.
"Most sites that ever linked both Network for Good and Qgiv still link both. The second tool gets added and stays." - Emma Davies, Data Analyst at TechnologyChecker.io
Sales signal: the 51 sites running Qgiv beside Network for Good, and the 20 running Donorbox, already pay for two donation tools. They are the obvious audience for a consolidation offer from either side.
The stack: hosted builders, few payment tags
Across the 3,699 live domains in our stack base, WordPress runs on 50.58%, but hosted builders are common: Squarespace on 17.38%, Wix on 13.14% and GoDaddy's builder on 5.0%, where Fundraise Up's domains show Squarespace on 9.46%. Payment tags are rare, PayPal on 2.08% and Stripe on 1.6%, which fits a giving page that lives on Network for Good's side rather than on the site. CRM tags are rarer still: Salesforce on 1.03% and Neon CRM on 0.43%. Google Analytics is on 57.1%, well below the 83.96% on Fundraise Up's domains.
Sales signal: a Squarespace or Wix nonprofit has no WordPress plugin route, so a hosted page behind a Donate link is the easy way to take money. Anything sold to this base has to work as a hosted page or a link.
What Bonterra says, and what we see
Network for Good was founded in 2001 and joined what became Bonterra in January 2022; its donor-advised fund went separately and is now For Good, according to Bonterra's July 2024 history of the product. Today networkforgood.com redirects to Bonterra's product page, which pitches coaching-first fundraising for small nonprofits, with an AI assistant called Que (read 14 October 2026). The pricing answer on that page says plans scale with the size of the contact database; the Free and Essentials plans keep a 3% platform fee on donations, and the Intelligence plan drops it. Our data fits the pitch closely: small, American, mostly on simple websites.
Sales signal: the 3% fee is the number rivals will attack, and on a small budget it shows. Which plan a nonprofit is on can't be seen from outside, so ask early.
Key takeaways
1. 3,690 live domains, 3.08% of Donations & Fundraising and 9th of 54, counted mostly from Donate links.
2. In an 80-domain sample, 60 of 64 linked domains were raising money for themselves; 4 linked someone else.
3. 64.32% have 1 to 10 staff and 95.36% are American.
4. 396 domains dropped it since March 2026; 38 of them still link it on another hostname.
5. Overlap with GiveWP (60), Qgiv (51) and Donorbox (20), but no measurable switching.
How to use this list
Read the link's subdomain before you call: an organisation's own account (racsjc.networkforgood.com on racsjc.org) is a customer, and someone else's is a referral. For the full list of 3,690 Network for Good domains with organisation, size and stack data, explore TechnologyChecker.io. Our guide to technology detection methods explains why a link and an installed script count differently.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who uses Network for Good?
Small American nonprofits, mostly. Our October 2026 crawl finds links to Network for Good giving pages on 3,690 live domains; 64.32% of matched organisations have 1 to 10 staff and 95.36% are in the United States. Larger names include Pew Research Center, National PTA, the National Democratic Institute, InterAction and the Animal Medical Center in New York.
How many customers does Network for Good have?
Our crawl finds Network for Good on 3,690 live domains, 3,106 matched to an organisation. Most are links to a giving page: in a random sample of 80 domains, 60 of the 64 showing a link pointed to the site's own campaign and 4 to someone else's. Bonterra's own blog says thousands of small and mid-size organisations use it. 396 domains have dropped it since March 2026.
What is Network for Good's market share?
3.08% of Donations & Fundraising, 9th of the 54 technologies we track there, based on 3,690 live domains at TechnologyChecker.io. Qgiv (3.8%) and Donorbox (5.85%) are counted the same way, by links or scripts, so they are the fairest comparisons. GiveWP leads the table at 27.38%, but that's a WordPress plugin installed on the site, a different kind of count.
What are the best alternatives to Network for Good?
In our crawl the closest are Qgiv (4,555 domains) and Donorbox (7,008), both hosted donation pages popular with small nonprofits; 51 Network for Good domains also run Qgiv and 20 run Donorbox. WordPress sites often use the GiveWP plugin (32,785 domains). Larger charities that want a checkout on their own site look at Fundraise Up, which our crawl finds on 5,422 domains.
Which countries use Network for Good the most?
The United States, almost exclusively: 2,962 of the 3,106 matched organisations, or 95.36%. No other country reaches ten. Kenya has 7, Canada 5, and the United Kingdom, Costa Rica, France and India 3 each, based on our enriched company data. Qgiv's profile shows the same US concentration, while Fundraise Up's base is 69.16% American, with sizeable Canadian and British groups.
What size companies use Network for Good?
Small ones. 64.32% of matched organisations with a known size have 1 to 10 employees, 24.42% have 11 to 50 and 8.13% have 51 to 200, so 88.74% have 50 staff or fewer. Only 15 have more than 1,000. That matches Bonterra's pitch for small nonprofits, and it's a smaller base than Qgiv's (55.1% at 1 to 10) or Fundraise Up's (44.97%).
How old are companies that use Network for Good?
Mostly founded since 2000. The 2010s are the largest decade at 31.29% and the 2000s come next at 20.94%, so 58.94% of matched organisations date from 2000 or later. Only 6.71% are from the 2020s, and 7.47% were founded before 1960. Fundraise Up's base is older: 49.79% of its matched organisations predate 2000, against 41.05% here.
What is the ideal customer profile for Network for Good?
The ideal Network for Good customer is: Organisation size: 1-10 staff (64.32%), then 11-50, Location: United States (95.36%), Founded: 2010s, then 2000s, Sector: Community nonprofits, schools, clinics, Site stack: WordPress or Squarespace site with a Donate link — based on our analysis of 3,106 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.
What happened to Network for Good?
It was split in two. Network for Good, founded in 2001, ran fundraising software and a donor-advised fund. In January 2022 the software joined EveryAction, Social Solutions and CyberGrants in what became Bonterra, backed by Apax Partners, and it now sells as Bonterra Network for Good. The donor-advised fund stayed separate and is now called For Good, per Bonterra's July 2024 history.
Does Network for Good still exist?
Yes, as a Bonterra product. networkforgood.com now redirects to Bonterra's Network for Good page, which describes a coaching-first fundraising platform for small nonprofits with a built-in AI assistant called Que (read 14 October 2026). Nonprofits still use it in numbers: our October 2026 crawl finds links to Network for Good giving pages on 3,690 live domains.
How much does Network for Good take from donations?
It depends on the plan. Bonterra's Network for Good page (read 14 October 2026) says pricing is based on the size of your contact database and the plan level. The Free and Essentials plans keep a 3% platform fee on donations, and the Intelligence plan removes it. Bonterra doesn't list plan prices on its pricing page, so the subscription cost comes from a quote.
Is Network for Good legitimate?
Yes. It has run since 2001, was a certified B Corporation, and has belonged to Bonterra since January 2022, per Bonterra's history of the product. Our crawl finds its giving pages linked from 3,690 live domains, including Pew Research Center, National PTA and InterAction. Questions about checks from Network for Good go to For Good, the separate donor-advised fund.
Is Network for Good a donor-advised fund?
Not any more. Network for Good used to have two sides: fundraising software and a 501(c)(3) donor-advised fund that processed donations for large partners. Since 2022 the software belongs to Bonterra, and the fund runs separately as For Good. Our rule counts links to networkforgood.com, the software's giving pages, so the 3,690 domains here are software users.
What does Network for Good do?
It gives small nonprofits donation pages and forms, donor management, email, events, peer-to-peer and grants tools, plus fundraising coaching, per Bonterra's product page. On a nonprofit's website what we usually see is a Donate link to a page on networkforgood.com. In our sample, 17 of 64 linked sites also linked a Network for Good form, and 2 embedded a donation form.
Network for Good vs Qgiv: which is better?
They chase the same small US nonprofits. Qgiv has 4,555 domains in our crawl to Network for Good's 3,690, and both bases are more than 95% American. Network for Good's users are smaller: 64.32% have 1 to 10 staff against Qgiv's 55.1%. 51 domains run both today. Network for Good adds coaching and an AI assistant, so compare what each plan includes.
Based on 3,106 company data
These insights include all TechnologyChecker.io detections of Network for Good (free & paid plans).
