Companies Using TradingView

I expected TradingView's widget footprint to be brokers and finance blogs. It's partly that. The bigger surprise was how many listed companies use a free TradingView widget as their share-price display, and how many sites aren't companies at all. A domain counts here when its pages load TradingView's widget scripts or iframes. After removing template investment sites and for-sale pages, that's 1,573 live domains in our October 2026 crawl, 654 matched to a company (41.6%), 21st of 55 in Charting & Data Visualization. It is not a count of TradingView's subscribers.

Four kinds of site, one of them removed

The matched domains I opened fall into three groups. Listed companies show their own ticker: when I opened the 90 largest by LinkedIn following, 27 charted the company's own shares, from BW Offshore and Midsona on Nasdaq Stockholm to J.B. Chemicals on the BSE and NSE and North American Construction Group on the TSX and NYSE. Brokers show the broker-rating badge, a widget that displays their rating on TradingView: 8 of the 90 carried it or TradingView's review badge, including OANDA, FXCM and FxPro. Finance publishers run tickers and market overviews, as Calcalist does on its homepage.

The fourth group was template investment sites, and we've taken it out. 821 of the 2,400 live domains had no company record and either a live-chat widget or a template lander title, and 36 of 40 I sampled sold crypto, forex or mining "investment plans". In all we removed 827 domains, 34.5% of the raw count, including a handful of for-sale and gambling pages.

Sales signal: the 654 matched companies are the market. Even after the clean-up, filter to matched domains before you count accounts.

Why the chart has one point

Our raw monthly totals rose from 721 domains in June to 2,416 in October. Some of that is our side: the domains we crawl turn over every month, with dead sites leaving and newly found ones arriving, and our detection widens over time. Most of the rest was template sites. Of the 715 live domains first seen in July, 536 match the template pattern and only 18 match a company, so we chart only the cleaned October figure.

"A third of the sites carrying TradingView's widgets were template investment sites. The real customers are listed companies showing their own share price, and brokers." - Emma Davies, Data Analyst at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales signal: treat the company-matched base as a few hundred accounts rather than a fast-growing segment of thousands. The raw growth won't show up in a CRM.

Who the companies are

On size, the matched base is small: 50.16% have 1 to 10 employees and 24.76% have 11 to 50. Trading educators, small brokers and investment blogs sit in that band. The listed issuers are the larger tail. 26 companies have more than 1,000 staff, among them B3, J.B. Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals and Dixon Technologies, and 150 of the 658 matched companies we rechecked on 13 October are listed on LinkedIn as public companies. Age splits the same way: 62.8% were founded in 2010 or later, while the older names, such as Fiem Industries (1952) and Century Enka (1965), are listed manufacturers.

Sales signal: a TradingView ticker on a manufacturer's homepage marks an investor-relations team that maintains the share-price display itself. IR website vendors and market-data providers should start with that group.

Finance first, then mining

Financial Services is 31.99% of matched companies, and with Investment Management (3.02%) and Capital Markets (2.01%) finance reaches 37.02%. Mining is second at 8.04%, and it is mostly Canadian: 34 of the Canadian companies are labelled Mining, which is why Canada (67) sits second behind the United States (137) and ahead of India (54), the United Kingdom (35) and Brazil (35). Indonesia (23) shows the issuer pattern too, with Trisula and Buana Lintas Lautan on the IDX, and so does Al Wathba National Insurance on the Abu Dhabi exchange.

Sales signal: for a finance or mining-sector offer, TradingView's matched list is a ready filter. For anything else it's thin: no other industry passes 3.02%.

Beside Chart.js, not instead of it

We publish no switching table for TradingView, because the overlaps don't pass our tests. 86 of the 1,573 domains also run Chart.js, 28 run ApexCharts and 23 Highcharts. A widget that brings live prices and a library that draws your own data do different jobs, so a site can keep both. Since March 2026, 617 domains have dropped TradingView, counted before the clean-up; when I checked on 13 October, 584 had left it on every hostname, and only 226 of those had a company record.

"Most domains that drop TradingView have no company behind them. They're template investment sites expiring, and the customers mostly stay." - Emma Davies, Data Analyst at TechnologyChecker.io

Sales signal: there's no displacement story to sell here. Chart vendors should pitch the site's own data, next to the widget.

The stack around it

Across the 1,573 domains, Google Analytics runs on 51.75%, WordPress on 35.16% and Elementor on 15.58%. Next.js (9.35%) shows the newer builds, and Google AdSense (10.36%) the publishers. The chat widgets that marked the template sites are nearly gone: Tawk.to, the only one of the five left, is on 10 domains.

Sales signal: a WordPress site with a TradingView ticker is the typical customer. If you build your own list from raw detections, exclude unmatched domains running live chat and most of the noise goes with them.

What it costs

The widgets are free. TradingView's widget page says they come with default TradingView branding and asks anyone wanting to remove the logo to contact it, and its Terms of Use say attribution on widgets should stay as designed. A paid TradingView plan doesn't change the widget data. For sites charting their own data, TradingView offers its Lightweight Charts library free, and Advanced Charts beside it. On 13 October 2026 its subscription page listed Essential at $12.95 and Ultimate at $199.95 a month, billed annually.

Sales signal: because the widget costs nothing, its presence says little about budget. A listed company or broker running one says more than the widget does.

Key takeaways

1. 1,573 live domains after the clean-up, 21st of 55, with 654 matched to a company.

2. 827 of 2,400 raw domains (34.5%) were removed, almost all template investment sites.

3. Finance is 37.02% of matched companies and Mining 8.04%, led by Canadian miners.

4. 27 of the 90 largest matched companies chart their own shares; 8 are brokers with a TradingView badge.

5. 86 domains run Chart.js beside TradingView, and no overlap passes our switching tests.

How to use this list

Start with matched companies, then split issuers from brokers and publishers. For the full list of 1,573 TradingView domains with company, size and stack data, explore TechnologyChecker.io. TradingView's own platform has traded second place with Alipay in Cloudflare Radar's Financial Services ranking this year, as tracked in our Q3 2026 category report.