<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<urlset
  xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
  xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1">
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/charts</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/123formbuilder-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use 123FormBuilder? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use 123FormBuilder the most? The United States dominates with 46.5% of all enriched companies, followed by the United Kingdom (8.8%) and Brazil (6.7%). English-speaking markets (US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand) together account for over 66% of the user base. Brazil&apos;s strong showing at #3 sets 123FormBuilder apart from most SaaS form tools, which typically see Canada or Germany in that slot, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/123formbuilder-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use 123FormBuilder the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Medical Practices leads at 4.44%, followed by Wellness and Fitness Services (3.88%) and Non-profit Organizations (3.13%). The healthcare tilt aligns with 123FormBuilder&apos;s certifications: it&apos;s HIPAA-compliant with BAA support, ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified, and also CCPA and COPPA compliant (per its security page). Village Health Partners, a medical practice, used 123FormBuilder for HIPAA-compliant vaccine data collection, as noted in their published testimonial. No single industry exceeds 4.5%, which makes 123FormBuilder a genuinely horizontal platform that over-indexes in compliance-sensitive verticals.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/123formbuilder-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>123FormBuilder Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is 123FormBuilder only for small businesses? Yes, overwhelmingly. With 85.9% of 123FormBuilder customers having 1-10 employees based on our analysis of 25,365 enriched companies, this is one of the highest micro-business concentrations we&apos;ve tracked. Only 0.1% of users have 10,001+ employees. That said, the exceptions are notable: UNICEF, Sysco, and Children&apos;s Hospital of Philadelphia all run 123FormBuilder on specific subdomains.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/123formbuilder-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>123FormBuilder Market Share Among Form Builders</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is 123FormBuilder&apos;s market share? 123FormBuilder holds a 0.87% share of the form builders market, ranking #2 behind Metform Elemento (1.12%), based on our monthly crawl of 29.6M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. The form builders category is fragmented: 36 tracked tools share roughly 3.66 million total domains, and no single tool exceeds 1.2%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/1password-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use 1Password? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use 1Password the most? The United States holds 7,554 of the 18,692 companies we could place, 40.41%, ahead of the United Kingdom on 1,880 (10.06%), Germany on 1,423 (7.61%), Canada on 1,069 (5.72%) and Australia on 1,053 (5.63%). Then the Netherlands 989 (5.29%), Switzerland 481 (2.57%), France 393 (2.10%), Sweden 321 (1.72%), Belgium 299 (1.60%), Denmark 254 (1.36%), Norway 246 (1.32%), Brazil 197 (1.05%), Italy 197 (1.05%) and New Zealand 192 (1.03%). Two shapes are worth naming against other profiles on TechnologyChecker.io. A US share of 40.41% is low for a product marketed out of North America, where a US-first SaaS profile more often runs close to half. And the European rows are heavier than usual: the Netherlands alone is 989 of the 18,692 companies, 5.29%, and Sweden, Denmark and Norway together are 821, 4.39%, with Germany at 1,423 sitting ahead of Canada. That is what a base of small technology firms looks like, because small technology firms are exactly what those markets produce in volume. Two caveats before reading the table. Country is the headquarters on the company record, not where anyone opens the app. And a verification record is published once at a group apex, so a multinational that buys centrally appears once, under its head office, rather than once per subsidiary.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/1password-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use 1Password the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 11.41% of the 18,496 companies with a recorded industry, 2,110 companies, ahead of IT Services and IT Consulting on 1,960 (10.60%), Technology, Information and Internet on 1,087 (5.88%), Financial Services on 986 (5.33%) and Advertising Services on 765 (4.14%). Then Business Consulting and Services 396 (2.14%), Information Technology &amp; Services 395 (2.14%), Hospitals and Health Care 383 (2.07%), Construction 318 (1.72%) and Non-profit Organizations 314 (1.70%). Group the four labels that describe the same kind of company and the base resolves at once: Software Development, IT Services and IT Consulting, Technology, Information and Internet, and Information Technology &amp; Services come to 5,552 companies, 30.02% of the 18,496. Close to a third of this list is a technology company, and no other industry reaches 6%. That concentration is the point of the page, because it is the same finding as the two tables beside it. 83.03% under 200 employees, 55.10% founded in 2010 or later and 30.02% technology companies are not three results, they are one: a software or IT firm founded in the last fifteen years with a headcount in the tens, whose engineers need shared secrets and which has no legacy identity platform to put them in.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/1password-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>1Password Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use 1Password? Small, and the distribution is emphatic about it. 6,118 of the 18,937 companies with a size band, 32.31%, employ 11 to 50 people, the largest band in the table, with 1-10 second on 5,511 (29.10%) and 51-200 third on 4,094 (21.62%). Add those three and 15,723 companies, 83.03% of the 18,937, employ fewer than 200 people. The top of the table is thin: 1,499 at 201-500 (7.92%), 740 at 501-1,000 (3.91%), 726 at 1,001-5,000 (3.83%), 116 at 5,001-10,000 (0.61%) and 133 at 10,001+ (0.70%), so only 975 companies, 5.15%, employ more than a thousand. Now set that against the named table, where Ford, General Motors, Roche and AstraZeneca all sit in the largest band, because that list is ordered by LinkedIn following. It shows the top of the base rather than its centre. The centre is a company of twenty or thirty people that reached the point where a shared spreadsheet of logins stopped being acceptable, bought a Business account, and verified its domain so new starters could be provisioned automatically. That is a self-serve purchase on a card rather than an enterprise procurement, and four fifths of this list looks like it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/1password-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>1Password Market Share Among Authentication &amp; SSO</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is 1Password&apos;s market share? 1Password holds 2.13% of Authentication &amp; SSO and ranks 5th of 54 in that category, on 20,876 domains. That is the position, and the four rows above it are what the position means. Facebook Login leads on 621,585 domains and 63.43%, Google Sign-in follows on 219,115 (22.36%), then Duo Security on 21,045 (2.15%) and LinkedIn Sign-in on 21,020 (2.15%). Three of those four are social sign-in buttons embedded on consumer websites so a visitor can log in with an account they already have, and those three together hold 87.94% of the category, 861,720 domains against 1Password&apos;s 20,876. A business password manager is a different product, bought by a different person, for a different reason. Duo Security, the one row above that is not a social button, is multi-factor authentication, which is adjacent to the job but not the same job. So 2.13% is a share of our Authentication &amp; SSO taxonomy and not a share of the password-manager market. The mechanism differs as well. A social login button sits in a page&apos;s markup, served to a browser and visible to anyone reading the source; 1Password sits in a DNS record that no page ever has to serve. A percentage computed across two kinds of evidence is a position in a table, not a measure of spend, seats or accounts.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/6sense-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use 6sense? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States dominates with 2,634 matched companies, more than eight times the United Kingdom&apos;s 305, with Canada third at 182. Australia (57), Germany (54), India (45), the Netherlands (36) and France (36) follow well behind. This is the most US-weighted distribution in the batch, and it reflects where account-based marketing is bought: intent data is priced in dollars against a US-centric account universe, and the practice itself is most established in North American B2B software sales.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/6sense-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use 6sense the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>The concentration here is extraordinary by the standards of this category. Software Development alone is 29.79% of matched companies and IT Services and IT Consulting adds 12.46%, so more than 42% of the base is technology. Technology, Information and Internet (3.83%), Financial Services (3.80%), Computer and Network Security (3.52%) and Advertising Services (3.52%) follow. For comparison, the category leader&apos;s top industry sits under 9%. 6sense is not a horizontal marketing tool that happens to be popular in tech; it is a tool for B2B technology companies selling to other enterprises.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/6sense-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>6sense Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>6sense is a mid-market and enterprise product, not a small-business one. The distribution peaks in the middle rather than at the bottom: 51 to 200 employees is the largest band at 27.08%, followed by 11 to 50 at 23.72% and 1 to 10 at only 17.23%. Every other platform in this category peaks at 1 to 10. A further 14.05% sit in the 201 to 500 band and 9.60% have more than 1,000 employees. That shape follows from the product: account-based marketing needs a defined target account list and a sales team to work it, which a ten-person company generally does not have.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/6sense-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>6sense Market Share Among Marketing Automation</image:title>
      <image:caption>6sense holds 0.54% of the Marketing Automation category and ranks #19 of 415. The share is close to meaningless as a competitive statement, because the category is dominated by platforms that do a different job. HubSpot (583,796 domains) and HighLevel (109,442) are systems of record that a company runs instead of a rival; 6sense is an intelligence layer it runs as well as one. The evidence is in the technology stack below, where HubSpot appears on 43.91% of 6sense domains. A more useful comparison is against other ABM and intent vendors, and against those 6,634 domains is a substantial B2B footprint.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ab-tasty-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use AB Tasty? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use AB Tasty the most? France dominates with 471 enriched companies, 35.3% of the total, reflecting AB Tasty&apos;s Parisian headquarters and deep European roots, based on our analysis of 1,342 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. The United States follows at 20.2% (269 companies) and the United Kingdom at 10.7% (143 companies). Together, these three markets account for over 66% of the customer base. European markets overall make up more than 60% of AB Tasty&apos;s users, which means the platform&apos;s support, documentation, and go-to-market are refined for European buyers first.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ab-tasty-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use AB Tasty the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use AB Tasty the most? Accounting leads at 11.1% (136 companies), followed by Retail at 7.3% (89 companies) and Newspaper Publishing at 4.7% (58 companies), based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io. The distribution is broad: no single industry exceeds 12%. Financial services, travel, insurance, and higher education each contribute 3-4%. This makes AB Tasty a genuinely horizontal experimentation platform, it sells on testing ROI rather than industry-specific features.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ab-tasty-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AB Tasty Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is AB Tasty only for enterprises? Not exactly, but it skews enterprise-heavy. 34.6% of AB Tasty customers have 1-10 employees, making micro-businesses the single largest segment, based on our analysis of 1,342 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. That said, 22.3% of customers have 500+ employees, and the platform counts P&amp;G, Booking.com, and UnitedHealthcare among its users. That enterprise concentration is much higher than typical SaaS tools. For comparison, 91.9% of 1and1 customers are micro-businesses. AB Tasty&apos;s profile is far more balanced.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ab-tasty-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AB Tasty Market Share Among A/B Testing &amp; Experimentation</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is AB Tasty&apos;s market share? AB Tasty holds 0.69% of the A/B testing category on 5,303 domains, ranking #9. The global figure understates its European position: with France nearly level with the United States in its own data, AB Tasty is a continental European platform competing with US incumbents rather than a global challenger.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/accessibe-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use accessiBe? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use accessiBe the most? The United States accounts for 78.47% of enriched companies with a country on file, 43,676 of them, which is heavier US concentration than almost anything else we track. Italy is a distant second at 4.37%, ahead of Canada (3.94%) and the United Kingdom (3.15%). That shape follows the legal exposure rather than the web: 3,117 federal website accessibility lawsuits were filed in the US in 2025.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/accessibe-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use accessiBe the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail is the largest vertical at 14.74% of the top ten industries we chart, with Real Estate close behind at 14.21% and Advertising Services third at 11.58%. Read those as shares of the charted ten, not of the whole customer base. Put Hospitals and Health Care (11.38%) next to Medical Practices (10.24%) and healthcare outweighs either leader, which is what a category shaped by US accessibility complaints tends to look like.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/accessibe-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>accessiBe Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is accessiBe used mainly by small businesses? Yes. 46.24% of enriched accessiBe customers have ten or fewer employees and another 28.47% fall in the 11 to 50 band, so roughly three quarters of the base sits under 50 people. The enterprise tail is thin but real: 2.18% run 1,001 to 5,000 staff and 0.28% are 10,001+, which is where names like Cummins and Sysco sit.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/accessibe-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>accessiBe Market Share Among Accessibility Tools</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is accessiBe&apos;s market share? accessiBe holds 21.9% of the Accessibility Tools category and ranks #2 of the 47 vendors we track across 430,588 domains, behind UserWay at 35.57% and ahead of AudioEye at 14.58%. Those three hold about three quarters of the category between them. Share is measured on detected domains from our monthly crawl of 29.9M active domains at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/accessibe-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>accessiBe Usage Statistics 2018-2026: 97,609 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>accessiBe enters our long-run detection history in November 2018 on a single domain, reaching 684 by January 2020, 5,203 by January 2022 and 13,315 by January 2024. Our live crawl now puts it at 97,609 active domains as of August 2026. One caveat on the chart: counts either side of the 2025-to-2026 gap are not like-for-like, because the set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly discovered ones added, and our detection signals widen over time, so the step across that gap is wider coverage and not a surge in adoption.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/acquia-cloud-platform-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Acquia Cloud Platform? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Acquia Cloud Platform the most? The United States leads with 3,501 of the 5,414 companies with a known country (64.67%), followed by the United Kingdom (342), Canada (285) and France (210). The US, UK, Canada, Australia and Ireland together account for 79.2%, but the base reaches 91 countries, and French groups such as TotalEnergies, Alstom and Air Liquide appear among the largest accounts in our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/acquia-cloud-platform-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Acquia Cloud Platform the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Start with a correction. Three enterprise fleets, Privia Health (354 domains), Warner Music Group (225) and Bayer (192), make up 771 of the 11,345 live domains, and Privia alone is 185 of the 408 records in Medical Practices, the top row as published at 8.63%. Remove the three fleets and Government Administration is #1 at 8.49%, ahead of Hospitals and Health Care at 7.12%, with Medical Practices falling to 4.99%, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/acquia-cloud-platform-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Acquia Cloud Platform Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Acquia Cloud Platform only for large enterprises? Not on paper: 34.79% of the 5,277 companies with a size on record have 1-10 employees, while 16.62% (877) employ more than 1,000, from our analysis of 5,540 enriched companies. The small end needs a caveat, though. Enterprise fleets such as Privia Health&apos;s 354 physician-practice sites and Bayer&apos;s 192 consumer-health brand sites put many single-practice and single-brand domains into that 1-10 row, so part of it is really large organisations&apos; estates.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/acquia-cloud-platform-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Acquia Cloud Platform Market Share Among PaaS</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Acquia Cloud Platform&apos;s market share? It holds 0.43% of the PaaS category and ranks #14 of 44 tracked technologies, in a table led by general clouds and front-end hosts such as Amazon Web Services (1,000,296 domains) and Vercel (479,716) that don&apos;t compete for the same buyer. The fairer yardstick is managed Drupal hosting. Across the 171,819 live Drupal domains in our crawl at TechnologyChecker.io, Pantheon hosts 12,694 (7.39%) and Acquia 11,307 (6.58%), which makes Acquia second, 1,387 domains behind, with Platform.sh (3,631) and Lagoon (1,082) well back.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/activecampaign-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use ActiveCampaign? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use ActiveCampaign the most? The United States leads at 35.9% of enriched customers, but the second place is the surprise: the Netherlands at 13.4%, far above its weight for a country of 18 million and the strongest Dutch concentration of any platform in this category. Australia (7.1%) and the United Kingdom (6.5%) follow, with Brazil (5.2%) and Spain (4.2%) close behind. EU member states account for 33.8% of the enriched base and English-speaking markets for 53.0%. Percentages are shares of the 34,243 ActiveCampaign domains where we have a company country on file.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/activecampaign-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use ActiveCampaign the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Professional Training and Coaching leads at 6.8%, followed closely by Advertising Services (6.27%) and Business Consulting and Services (4.53%). The top five industries are all service-based, knowledge-economy verticals, and no single vertical exceeds 7%, making ActiveCampaign a genuinely horizontal platform. Wellness and Fitness Services (3.58%) and IT Services and IT Consulting (3.38%) round out the top five, per our analysis of 35,497 enriched companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/activecampaign-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ActiveCampaign Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is ActiveCampaign only for small businesses? Not quite, but they&apos;re the core. 60.3% of ActiveCampaign customers have 1-10 employees, based on our analysis of 35,497 enriched companies. The 11-50 range adds 26.8%, taking the base to 87.2% under 50 people. What&apos;s notable is the 8.9% mid-market presence (51-200 employees), higher than most competitors in this category. ActiveCampaign attracts established businesses: 45.9% were founded in the 2010s, with only 15.9% from the 2020s, the lowest 2020s share of any platform here.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/activecampaign-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ActiveCampaign Market Share Among Email Marketing</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is ActiveCampaign&apos;s market share? ActiveCampaign holds 2.1% of the Email Marketing market, ranking #10 behind Mailchimp (21.24%), Klaviyo (16.78%), and SendGrid (13.23%). While it trails the leaders by a wide margin, ActiveCampaign&apos;s 52,180 active domains and unusually deep automation engine keep it in the mid-market conversation, based on our monthly crawl of 28.2M domains and 7,900+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-analytics-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Adobe Analytics? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Adobe Analytics the most? The United States dominates with 40,178 domains — roughly 80% of the entire enriched base, the most extreme single-country concentration of any profile we publish. Germany follows at a distant 1,234, then the United Kingdom (1,092), Canada (1,062), Australia (654) and Spain (649). For a product sold globally by one of the largest software companies in the world, that is a striking imbalance, and it is consistent with the franchise and dealer-network deployments that make up much of the domain count.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-analytics-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Adobe Analytics the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use Adobe Analytics? Insurance leads at 21.43% — by far the sharpest single-industry concentration we measure anywhere on this site, and more than double the next entry. Retail follows at 8.97%, then Motor Vehicle Manufacturing (6.73%), Construction (5.94%) and Law Practice (5.03%). Insurance, auto and legal all share the same structure: a national brand with a large network of local agents, dealers or offices, each with its own domain carrying the corporate analytics tag.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-analytics-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Adobe Analytics Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Adobe Analytics used by small businesses? The data says yes, with an important catch. 56.05% of detected domains belong to companies with 1-10 employees and 26.24% to companies with 11-50, based on our analysis of 50,219 enriched companies. But these are mostly franchise locations, dealer sites and branch offices rather than independent small businesses — the contract sits with a corporate parent that rolls the tag out across hundreds of local domains. Read the size distribution as a map of deployment topology, not of who is buying.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-analytics-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Adobe Analytics Market Share Among Web Analytics</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Adobe Analytics&apos;s market share? Adobe Analytics holds 0.52% of the web analytics category by domain count, ranking #14 on 88,060 domains. That raw number undersells the platform badly, and the reason is structural: this category is measured in domains, and it is dominated by free tools installed by the million — Google Analytics at 64.26%, Cloudflare Browser Insights at 11.25%. Adobe Analytics sells six-figure annual contracts to large enterprises. Counting its footprint the same way as a free WordPress plugin measures the wrong thing.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-experience-manager-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Adobe Experience Manager? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 10,951 matched companies. Germany (2,247) and the United Kingdom (2,170) follow closely, then India (984), Canada (948) and Australia (849). The German and Indian shares both run ahead of the corpus norm, reflecting AEM&apos;s strength among European manufacturers and the concentration of Adobe implementation partners in India.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-experience-manager-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Adobe Experience Manager the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 5.34%, followed by Motor Vehicle Manufacturing (4.23%), Financial Services (3.94%), Insurance (3.61%) and Restaurants (3.53%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-experience-manager-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Adobe Experience Manager Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>This distribution needs care. Companies of 1 to 10 employees appear as the largest bucket at 47.52%, which is not what an enterprise platform&apos;s customer base looks like. AEM estates are typically many domains per organisation, covering brands, campaigns and regional sites, and those separate domains often resolve to small local entities in company records. Organisations above 1,000 employees still account for 10.23% of matched domains, and that is where the platform is actually bought.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-experience-manager-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Adobe Experience Manager Market Share Among CMS &amp; Website Builders</image:title>
      <image:caption>Adobe Experience Manager holds 0.37% of the CMS &amp; Website Builders category and ranks 14th of 50 tracked technologies. The category is dominated by WordPress at 62.27%, which sits on nearly ten million domains. Counting domains measures how many sites run a platform, not what those sites are worth, and AEM occupies the opposite end of that curve: comparatively few sites, each belonging to a large organisation.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-experience-platform-launch-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Adobe Experience Platform Launch? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Adobe Experience Platform Launch the most?The United States leads with 70.59% of enriched customers, ahead of the United Kingdom (5.39%), Canada (4.61%), Germany (3.89%) and Spain (2.73%). That is a wider international spread than the other enterprise tag managers we track, which fits a product sold through Adobe&apos;s global enterprise salesforce rather than a single-market vendor.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-experience-platform-launch-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Adobe Experience Platform Launch the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use Adobe Experience Platform Launch?Retail leads at 11.01%, followed by Motor Vehicle Manufacturing at 7.46% and Law Practice at 5.61%, out of 37,951 identified companies. Financial Services (3.51%), Hospitality (3.21%) and Insurance (2.92%) round out the top six. It is a broad enterprise distribution with no single vertical dominating, which is the opposite of what we see on Ensighten, where insurance alone accounts for 72.5%.The motor-vehicle share is the one that stands out. At 7.46% it is roughly triple the rate we measure for tag managers overall, and it reflects how completely the automotive industry standardised on Adobe&apos;s analytics suite, dealer networks included.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-experience-platform-launch-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Adobe Experience Platform Launch Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Adobe Experience Platform Launch?Is Adobe Launch only for large enterprises? The distribution says otherwise, and needs explaining. 46.55% of Adobe Experience Platform Launch customers have 1-10 employees, based on our analysis of 37,951 enriched companies. Adobe Launch reaches those domains through big contracts rather than small purchases: dealer networks, franchisees, regional offices and agency-built microsites inherit the parent organisation&apos;s tag. Companies with 11-50 staff add 23.98% and 51-200 another 13.48%. The enterprises where the decision is actually made, Accenture, Deloitte, IBM, PwC and McDonald&apos;s among them, sit in the 10,001+ band.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-experience-platform-launch-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Adobe Experience Platform Launch Market Share Among Tag Management</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Adobe Experience Platform Launch&apos;s market share?Adobe Launch holds 0.71% of the tag management market by domain count and ranks #2 of the 17 tag managers we track, based on our monthly crawl of 29.9M active domains. Share is the wrong lens here. Google Tag Manager takes 97.9% of the category because it costs nothing, so the meaningful comparison is against the other paid tools, and on that basis Adobe Launch is roughly 2.7x the size of Tealium (29,075) and 3.7x Ensighten (20,976). With 77,129 detected domains and 37,951 enriched companies, it is the default tag manager for organisations already inside Adobe Experience Cloud.One detail worth knowing when comparing rows in this category: Adobe Launch still serves its library from the adobedtm.com host it inherited from Adobe DTM, and 67.68% of Adobe Launch domains are also detected as Adobe DTM. The two entries are largely the same installations seen through two signatures, not two separate products competing for share.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-experience-platform-launch-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Adobe Experience Platform Launch Usage Statistics 2021-2026: 77,129 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>How has Adobe Experience Platform Launch adoption changed over time?Adobe Launch enters our records in November 2021 on 581 domains and climbs steadily through 2023 and 2024, reaching 4,127 domains in November 2024. Our current crawl detects it on 77,129 domains, having moved from 54,544 in June 2026 to 76,299 in July and 77,129 in August.The two figures are not a like-for-like series. The set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly discovered ones added, and our detection signals widen over time, so the step between the earlier series and the current one reflects coverage rather than a surge in adoption. Inside the current window the curve is close to flat: 76,299 in July to 77,129 in August is under 1.1% of movement.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-fonts-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Adobe Fonts? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Adobe Fonts the most?The United States dominates with 57.33% of the countries we can place, ahead of the United Kingdom (12.93%), Australia (5.89%), Canada (5.59%), the Netherlands (3.15%) and Germany (2.82%).That is one of the most US-weighted distributions we measure, and the reason is largely Squarespace, whose own customer base is heavily American and which accounts for nearly half of these detections. Read this as a map of Squarespace and Creative Cloud adoption rather than of typography.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-fonts-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Adobe Fonts the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use Adobe Fonts the most?Nothing leads: construction (3.78%), advertising services (3.43%), business consulting (3.15%), real estate (3.08%) and retail (2.62%) sit within about a point of each other.This is close to a picture of Squarespace&apos;s customer base, which is what you would expect when that one platform supplies nearly half the detections. Advertising services near the top (3.43%) is the segment most likely to hold a genuine Creative Cloud licence, but it is a small part of the whole.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-fonts-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Adobe Fonts Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Adobe Fonts?69.89% of identified companies have 1-10 staff and 19.97% have 11-50, out of 769,497 identified companies.A paid font service on that many micro-businesses looks contradictory, and the resolution is not that they all subscribe. 58.48% of Squarespace domains run Adobe Fonts, and Squarespace is a site builder sold to exactly this kind of small business. The typical domain in this table is a Squarespace site whose owner picked a font from a menu, not a company that bought Creative Cloud.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-fonts-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Adobe Fonts Market Share Among Font Services</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Adobe Fonts&apos; market share?Adobe Fonts holds 6.38% of the font services category and ranks #3 of 24. Google Font API leads on 10,997,995 domains and Font Awesome follows on 5,822,089, with Twitter Emoji (868,571) and Bootstrap Icons (215,879) behind Adobe.Share is the wrong way to read this category, because the leaders are free and Adobe Fonts is not. Google Fonts is the default in almost every template ever shipped; it wins on being already there. And Adobe&apos;s own position is largely a distribution deal rather than a sales result: Squarespace supplies 47.59% of these domains, so roughly half of third place was won by being bundled into somebody else&apos;s product.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-target-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Adobe Target? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 3,055 matched companies, or 57.62% of those with a known country. Canada follows at 8.43% (447), then Brazil at 4.26% (226), the United Kingdom at 3.98% (211) and Australia at 3.85% (204). The Canadian and Brazilian shares both run above the corpus norm.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-target-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Adobe Target the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 16.38%, followed by Motor Vehicle Manufacturing (13.04%), Hospitality (6.81%), Financial Services (5.08%) and Real Estate (4.70%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-target-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Adobe Target Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Organisations above 1,000 employees account for 15.10% of matched customers, including 5.95% at 10,000 or more. As with other Adobe Experience Cloud products, the large 1 to 10 bracket at 32.90% mostly reflects brand and regional domains belonging to much larger organisations rather than genuine small-business adoption.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adobe-target-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Adobe Target Market Share Among Website Personalization</image:title>
      <image:caption>Adobe Target holds 5.61% of the Website Personalization category and ranks 4th of 50 tracked technologies. The category is fragmented, with no technology above 8.3%, and it mixes enterprise personalization engines with ecommerce apps and onboarding widgets. Read the rank as position among tools that alter what a visitor sees, not as a like-for-like enterprise comparison.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adp-workforce-now-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use ADP Workforce Now? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use ADP Workforce Now the most? The United States dominates at 91.3% of all customers, based on our analysis of 2,051 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. Canada follows at a distant 2.8%, with India and the UK each under 2%. This is one of the most US-concentrated customer bases we track across any technology. ADP Workforce Now is clearly fine-tuned for US payroll, tax, and compliance requirements, international buyers should evaluate whether their local compliance needs are supported.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adp-workforce-now-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use ADP Workforce Now the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use ADP Workforce Now the most? Hospitals and Health Care leads at 7.02%, followed by Nonprofit Organizations at 5.44%, based on our enriched data at TechnologyChecker.io. No single industry exceeds 8%, which makes ADP Workforce Now a genuinely horizontal platform. Construction (4.87%), Financial Services (4.58%), and Staffing &amp; Recruiting (3.66%) round out the top five. Healthcare&apos;s leading position makes sense, mid-sized healthcare organizations have complex payroll requirements (shift differentials, multiple locations, compliance) that ADP handles well.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adp-workforce-now-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ADP Workforce Now Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use ADP Workforce Now? Not quite what you&apos;d expect from a &quot;mid-market&quot; product. 31.2% of customers have 1-10 employees, making micro-businesses the largest segment, based on our analysis of 2,051 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. But the mid-market sweet spot is well-represented too: 18.7% have 51-200 employees, 11.2% have 201-500, and 8.2% have 501-1,000. Combined, companies with 51-1,000 employees make up 38.1% of the customer base, the segment ADP targets most directly. The micro-business presence likely reflects ADP&apos;s broad sales channels and brand recognition.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adp-workforce-now-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ADP Workforce Now Market Share Among HR &amp; Recruitment</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is ADP Workforce Now&apos;s market share? ADP Workforce Now holds a 6.52% share of the HR &amp; Recruitment market, ranking #3 in the category, based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains at TechnologyChecker.io. It trails WP Job Openings (20.7%) and Greenhouse (8.08%), though those are recruitment-specific tools, not full HCM suites. ADP Workforce Now competes in the broader HCM space against platforms like BambooHR, Paylocity, and Paycom. Its 6.52% share in a fragmented category represents significant scale for a mid-market-focused product.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adroll-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use AdRoll? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use AdRoll the most? The United States dominates with 10,186 companies (64% of enriched customers), but AdRoll&apos;s footprint extends across 12+ countries. The United Kingdom (951) and Australia (940) follow, with Canada (783) rounding out the top four. English-speaking markets account for roughly 82% of the user base, based on our analysis of 15,867 enriched companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adroll-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use AdRoll the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Real Estate leads at 8.55%, narrowly ahead of Retail (8.02%) and Software Development (4.88%). Advertising Services agencies themselves account for another 4.39%, often deploying AdRoll on behalf of clients. No single industry exceeds 9%, which makes AdRoll a genuinely horizontal retargeting tool rather than a vertical specialist.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adroll-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AdRoll Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is AdRoll only for small businesses? Mostly yes. 57% of AdRoll customers have 1-10 employees, and another 22% sit in the 11-50 range, based on 15,506 size-categorised companies at TechnologyChecker.io. Together, companies under 50 staff make up 79% of the user base. Enterprise deployments do exist (Wipro, HSBC, Sony, Verizon, Honeywell), but they&apos;re almost always microsites or campaign-specific subdomains, not company-wide ad infrastructure.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/adroll-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AdRoll Market Share Among Ad Networks</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is AdRoll&apos;s market share? AdRoll holds 1% of the advertising networks category on 46,249 domains, ranking #15. Unlike the platform pixels above it, AdRoll is a paid retargeting product a business subscribes to, so its presence is a better indicator of active spend than a social pixel&apos;s is.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/affirm-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Affirm? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Affirm the most? The United States accounts for 3,805 enriched merchants (88.49%), the most concentrated geography of any BNPL provider we track. Canada adds 7.98% and the United Kingdom just 0.86%. Where Afterpay keeps a fifth of its base in Australia, Affirm is effectively a North American product, and 96% of its enriched merchants sit in the US or Canada.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/affirm-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Affirm the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 15.51%, but the rest of Affirm&apos;s mix is what sets it apart. Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry (6.74%), Motor Vehicle Manufacturing (5.5%), Furniture and Home Furnishings (3.64%), Sporting Goods (3.07%) and Computers and Electronics (1.89%) are all durable, high-value categories. Add Automotive at 1.78% and roughly one Affirm merchant in eight sells vehicles or vehicle-related goods.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/affirm-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Affirm Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Affirm only for small businesses? Less so than its rivals. 58.07% of Affirm merchants employ 1 to 10 people, against 76.47% for Afterpay, and 28.93% employ 11 to 50. The 1,001 to 5,000 band holds 1.24%, more than three times Afterpay&apos;s share of the same band. Based on 4,374 enriched companies, Affirm reaches further up market than any other provider here.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/affirm-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Affirm Market Share Among Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL)</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Affirm&apos;s market share? Affirm holds 8.17% of the Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) market and ranks #2, well ahead of Sezzle on 7.45% but roughly one eighth the size of Afterpay on 68.33%. Ranking second in a category this concentrated means something different than usual, based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/affirm-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Affirm Usage Statistics 2015-2026: 9.5K Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Affirm entered our detection history in January 2015 on two domains and grew steadily through the late 2010s as US ecommerce adopted instalment checkout. Read the chart with one caveat: it splices our long-run detection history through July 2025 with our own live crawl from June 2026, so the step from 6,111 to 7,794 across the gap reflects a change in crawl coverage rather than adoption. Inside the live crawl, Affirm has gone from 7,794 in June 2026 to 9,523 in August 2026.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/afternic-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Afternic? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Afternic the most? The United States leads Afternic&apos;s customer base with 11,610 companies (58.2% of enriched data). The UK ranks second with 1,760 (8.8%), and India third with 1,084 (5.4%). Geographic concentration reflects the platform&apos;s US origins and its integration with GoDaddy, whose customer base is heavily North American. Why so US-heavy? Domain investing and aftermarket sales are most active in English-speaking markets with established digital commerce infrastructure. The US also leads in parking revenue because of higher ad CPMs and more developed PPC networks. International adoption is rising in the UK, India, and Canada, but Afternic&apos;s commission structure (30% standard, 20% discounted) and registrar partnerships favor US-based investors who can plug directly into GoDaddy&apos;s network (Afternic fee schedule).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/afternic-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Afternic the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use Afternic the most? No single industry exceeds 5.2% of Afternic&apos;s customer base, which marks a horizontal user distribution. The top three industries are Advertising Services (5.17%), IT Services and IT Consulting (5.09%), and Technology/Information/Internet (4.31%). These sectors line up with digital-first businesses that understand domain value and actively trade aftermarket assets. Retail companies make up 3.85% of users, likely using Afternic to park expired campaign domains or hold brand-protective registrations. Real Estate (3.58%) follows, reflecting the industry&apos;s pattern of registering multiple location-based domains for lead generation. The lack of industry concentration says Afternic is used by opportunistic domain investors across verticals, not tied to a specific business model or sector.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/afternic-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Afternic Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Afternic? Afternic skews heavily toward micro-businesses: 89.81% of users have 1-10 employees. It&apos;s the highest small-business concentration we see in the domain registrar category. Only 7.65% of users have 11-50 employees, and enterprise accounts (10,001+) make up just 0.06% of the total. This distribution lines up with Afternic&apos;s positioning as a domain aftermarket and parking platform rather than an enterprise registrar. Individual domain investors, solo entrepreneurs, and small holding companies make up the bulk of users. The commission-based model (15-30% of sales) suits small operators who don&apos;t need complex infrastructure but want access to GoDaddy&apos;s buyer network for domain liquidation.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/afternic-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Afternic Market Share Among DNS &amp; Domain Services</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Afternic&apos;s market share? Afternic holds 2.02% of the domain registrar market, ranking #4 among 50 tracked technologies in this category. Market leader GoDaddy Parking sits at 62.03%, but Afternic&apos;s syndication into 100+ partner registrars including 8 of the top 10 gives it access to roughly 85 million monthly domain searches (Afternic, About page). That makes it a specialist marketplace rather than a mass parking solution. Afternic&apos;s category share reflects its focus on premium domain sales and investor portfolios, not general parking. It competes with GoDaddy Parking (31x larger) and Google Domains (11x larger) by selling distribution: Fast Transfer, Lease to Own, broker services, and registrar-network listings. Companies using Afternic tend to be professional domain investors or businesses holding valuable aftermarket domains.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/afterpay-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Afterpay? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Afterpay the most? The United States accounts for 16,739 enriched merchants (51.26%), but the more telling number is Australia at 20.07%. No other BNPL provider we track holds that much weight in its home market after a US expansion. The United Kingdom (9.16%), Canada (6.63%) and New Zealand (3.28%) round out a footprint that is just over 90% English-speaking.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/afterpay-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Afterpay the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail is the largest vertical at 18.49%. Add Retail Apparel and Fashion (7.21%) and Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry (1.64%) and explicit retail passes 27%. Less obvious is how much of the tail is food and body: Restaurants (4.44%), Food and Beverage Services (4.04%), Wellness and Fitness Services (3.41%) and Personal Care Product Manufacturing (2.51%). Afterpay&apos;s basket sizes are small, and the merchant mix shows it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/afterpay-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Afterpay Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Afterpay only for small businesses? Mostly, yes. 76.47% of Afterpay merchants employ 1 to 10 people and another 17.43% employ 11 to 50, based on our analysis of 34,053 enriched companies. Under 1% have more than 500 staff. The enterprise names are real but rare: Old Navy, Skechers, Coach and Mattel all run it, yet the 10,001+ band is 0.09% of merchants.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/afterpay-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Afterpay Market Share Among Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL)</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Afterpay&apos;s market share? Afterpay holds a 68.33% share of the Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) market and ranks #1, which puts it at roughly eight times the size of Affirm on 8.17% and larger than the other 42 providers we track combined. That comes from our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/afterpay-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Afterpay Usage Statistics 2012-2026: 80K Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Afterpay first appeared in our detection history in October 2012 on a single domain, and spent its first five years almost entirely inside Australia. Growth turned steep after 2018, when the US launch pulled it into North American retail. One caveat on the chart. The series splices two coverage periods, our long-run detection history through July 2025 and our own live crawl from June 2026, so the step from 30,803 to 67,447 across that gap is a change in crawl coverage, not a year of adoption. The current figure of 79,610 active domains comes from the live crawl.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/agentic-ai-barriers-by-region-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Top Barriers to Agentic AI in Production 2025: 60% Cite Agent Management</image:title>
      <image:caption>60% of senior IT leaders in Asia-Pacific cite managing and monitoring AI agents at scale as the top barrier to putting agentic AI into production in 2025 — the highest rate globally, according to Dynatrace and Qualtrics&apos; survey of 919 respondents. In EMEA, 50% cite the same barrier. The Americas reverses the order — 51% cite shortage of skilled staff as the #1 obstacle versus 45% citing management overhead. The regional split: in Asia and Europe, the problem is operational complexity; in the Americas, it is talent supply.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/agentic-ai-enterprise-software-share-2024-2028.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Agentic AI in Enterprise Software: 1% in 2024, 33% Forecast by 2028</image:title>
      <image:caption>Less than 1 percent of enterprise software applications incorporated agentic AI in 2024. Gartner forecasts 33 percent by 2028, a 33x increase in four years. The shift ends the prompt-and-paste era of AI integration and opens the door to autonomous agents wired directly into business workflows.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/agentic-ai-market-value-2024-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Agentic AI Market Value 2024-2030: $5.1B to Forecast $47.1B (44% CAGR)</image:title>
      <image:caption>The agentic AI market grew from $5.1 billion in 2024 to a forecast $47.1 billion by 2030, a compound annual growth rate of over 44 percent. Few software sub-categories have ever shown this steep a curve from baseline to multi-tens-of-billions inside a six-year window.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/agile-crm-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Agile CRM? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Agile CRM the most? Which countries use Agile CRM the most? The United States leads with 39.2% of all customers, followed by Australia and the United Kingdom at 9.6% each. Canada rounds out the top four at 5.3%. Together, English-speaking countries account for over 64% of the user base, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/agile-crm-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Agile CRM the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use Agile CRM the most? Advertising Services is the dominant industry at 10.36%, followed by IT Services and IT Consulting (6.18%) and Business Consulting and Services (6.18%), based on our analysis of 699 enriched companies. The top three are all service-oriented sectors, which fits Agile CRM&apos;s positioning as a sales-and-marketing combo tool for agencies and consultancies. No single industry exceeds 11%, making it a genuinely horizontal platform.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/agile-crm-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Agile CRM Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Agile CRM? Is Agile CRM only for small businesses? Essentially, yes. A full 75.4% of Agile CRM customers have 1-10 employees, based on our analysis of 699 enriched companies. Add the 11-50 bracket and you&apos;re at 92.3%. There&apos;s almost no enterprise presence: just one company above 1,000 employees in the entire dataset. Agile CRM&apos;s free tier for up to 10 users makes it a natural fit for micro-businesses that need a CRM without the price tag.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/agile-crm-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Agile CRM Market Share Among CRM</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Agile CRM&apos;s market share? Agile CRM holds 0.18% of the CRM category on 1,226 domains, ranking #28. In a category measured by domain count, a small-business CRM competing against Salesforce and Microsoft will always place low; what the data does show clearly is that it serves a genuinely different customer.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ahrefs-analytics-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Ahrefs Analytics? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Ahrefs Analytics the most? The United States leads with 14,534 domains, followed by the United Kingdom (3,792), India (1,895), Australia (1,679), Canada (1,602) and the Netherlands (1,192). That is a conventional English-speaking-first distribution, and it differs sharply from the EU-weighted footprints of Plausible and Umami — further evidence that Ahrefs Analytics is adopted as an SEO-adjacent add-on rather than as a privacy or data-residency decision.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ahrefs-analytics-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Ahrefs Analytics the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use Ahrefs Analytics? Software Development leads at 6.06%, followed by IT Services and IT Consulting (5.24%), Construction (4.18%), Technology, Information and Internet (4.07%) and Advertising Services (3.81%). The tech-adjacent top two are expected for a developer-facing product; Advertising Services in the top five is the more telling entry, since it points at agencies deploying it across client sites alongside their existing SEO work.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ahrefs-analytics-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ahrefs Analytics Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Ahrefs Analytics only for small businesses? Mostly, though less extremely than its peers. 53.22% of enriched domains belong to companies with 1-10 employees and 28.96% to companies with 11-50, with a comparatively healthy 11.26% in the 51-200 band — a flatter distribution than Umami (76.49% at 1-10) or Plausible (71.87%). Larger organisations in our detections include IBM, PNC Financial Services, Motorola Solutions, Mercer, Jabil, Amdocs and Al Rajhi Bank, based on our analysis of 39,069 enriched companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ahrefs-analytics-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ahrefs Analytics Market Share Among Web Analytics</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Ahrefs Analytics&apos;s market share? It holds 0.32% of the web analytics category and ranks #18 on 55,255 domains. That is small next to Google Analytics (64.26%), but the comparison is less meaningful than usual here, because Ahrefs Analytics is mostly not competing with Google Analytics — it is sitting next to it. 85.69% of its domains run both.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ahrefs-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Ahrefs? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Ahrefs the most? The United States leads with 11,856 companies, 39.6% of the enriched base, followed by the United Kingdom (2,721), India (1,645), Australia (1,616) and Canada (1,582). India&apos;s third place is the notable one: it reflects the country&apos;s digital marketing services industry, where Ahrefs is standard toolkit for agencies serving Western clients. Continental Europe follows with Germany (970), the Netherlands (816), Spain (469) and France (465), and there is a visible emerging-market tail in the UAE (330), Turkiye (327) and Indonesia (259).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ahrefs-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Ahrefs the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Ahrefs&apos; industry mix is strikingly flat, with no vertical above 4.8%. IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 4.77%, followed by Retail (4.41%), Construction (4.17%), Software Development (4.1%) and Advertising Services (3.81%). The presence of Construction, Real Estate (2.82%), Medical Practices (2.66%) and Law Practice (2.13%) so high in the table is the real signal: these are local-services businesses that compete almost entirely on organic search, and they are buying SEO tooling directly rather than through an agency.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ahrefs-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ahrefs Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Ahrefs only for small businesses? No, though small teams drive the volume. 51.47% of matched companies have 1-10 employees and 29.19% have 11-50, so roughly 81% sit under 50 people, based on 29,928 enriched companies. That is the agency-and-freelancer core. The mid-market is better represented here than on most tools we track: 12% have 51-200 employees and 3.97% have 201-500. Per Ahrefs&apos; homepage, marketers at 44% of Fortune 500 companies use the tool, which the 0.32% of domains at 10,001+ employees plainly understates, since a Fortune 500 marketing team rarely adds a verification tag to the corporate homepage.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ahrefs-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ahrefs Market Share Among SEO Tools</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Ahrefs&apos; market share? Ahrefs holds a 0.94% share of the SEO Tools category and ranks #4 of 48 tracked technologies, on 51,370 domains carrying its verification tag. That rank is not a like-for-like contest. The three products above it are on-page WordPress plugins that ship inside a site&apos;s HTML on every page: Yoast SEO (3,746,462 domains), RankMath SEO (939,870) and All in One SEO Pack (606,876). Ahrefs is an off-page research platform whose work happens in a browser tab, not on the customer&apos;s website. Comparing the two on domain counts measures how each is installed, not how many people pay for it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-adoption-strategies-marketers-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Organizational AI Adoption Strategies 2024: Training Leads at 27%</image:title>
      <image:caption>In a 2024 survey, roughly 27 percent of marketers said their organization&apos;s leading AI adoption strategy was offering training courses and workshops. Nearly 17 percent said their organization was collaborating with AI technology providers, and about 16 percent were hiring AI experts and consultants. Internal upskilling is the dominant path to adoption.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-app-consumer-spend-2023-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Mobile App Consumer Spend 2023-2024: $380M to $1.42B (+274%)</image:title>
      <image:caption>AI mobile apps registered global consumer spend of $1.42 billion in 2024, up from around $380 million in 2023. The 274 percent year-over-year increase shows how quickly paid AI apps moved from novelty to mainstream consumer spending in a single year.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-app-users-by-age-2023-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI App Users by Age 2023-2024: Under-25s Dominate Every Category</image:title>
      <image:caption>Between 2023 and 2024, AI companion apps had an audience of around 65 percent users aged 18 to 24 — the youngest-skewing category. Education apps followed, with 56 percent of users in the same age group. The 18-24 cohort was the largest demographic using AI-powered apps in every examined category, from companions to transcription.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-app-users-by-gender-2023-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI App Users by Gender 2023-2024: Up to 89% Male in Utility Apps</image:title>
      <image:caption>Between 2023 and 2024, around 89 percent of AI utility app users were men. Across every selected AI app category, male users outnumbered female users. AI education apps had the largest share of female users, with approximately 31 percent of women accessing AI learning apps — the most balanced category.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-big-data-core-skill-by-industry-2025-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI &amp; Big Data as a Core Skill by Industry 2025-2030: Tech Leads at 66%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Information and technology services and telecommunications lead, with 66 percent of employers in each expecting AI and big data to be core skills for their workers between 2025 and 2030. Financial services (61%), insurance and pensions (58%), and education and training (56%) follow. Even the lowest-ranked industries — infrastructure (39%) and professional services (37%) — place the skill above one in three workers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-big-data-core-skills-by-region-2025-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI as Core Skill 2025-2030: 62% in N. America, 32% in Central Asia</image:title>
      <image:caption>62% of North American employers expect artificial intelligence and big data to be core worker skills between 2025 and 2030 — the highest share globally, according to the World Economic Forum and Qualtrics&apos; Future of Jobs survey of 1,000 employers. Southeastern Asia (58%), Southern Asia (55%), and Sub-Saharan Africa (55%) follow closely, signaling emerging-market employer demand matches or exceeds many advanced economies. Europe sits in the middle at 44%, behind the Middle East (46%) and Eastern Asia (45%). Central Asia is the global outlier at 32%, the only region where fewer than 40% of employers classify AI as a core skill.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-bot-traffic-by-website-vertical-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Shopping Is the Most AI-Crawled Website Category in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Shopping and general merchandise is the single most AI-crawled corner of the web. In Q1 2026, sites in that vertical absorbed 31.2% of all AI bot traffic measured by Cloudflare Radar — nearly double the next category, internet and telecom (16.8%). The intensity of crawling against product catalogues is a big part of why e-commerce sites are among the most likely to block AI bots in robots.txt.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-chip-market-revenue-2018-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Chip Market Revenue 2018-2030: $9.3B to Forecast $332.77B (36x)</image:title>
      <image:caption>The AI chip market is the physical backbone of every other AI trend in this post. Revenue grew from $9.3 billion in 2018 to a forecast $332.77 billion in 2030 — a 36x increase. The 2025 figure alone ($92.74B) is bigger than the entire 2021 market. Machine learning, deep learning, and generative AI workloads account for nearly all of the growth.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-core-skills-by-industry-2025-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI as Core Skill by Industry 2025-2030: 66% in Tech &amp; Telecom</image:title>
      <image:caption>66% of employers in information technology services and telecommunications expect artificial intelligence and big data to be core worker skills between 2025 and 2030 — tied for the highest share of any industry, according to the World Economic Forum and Qualtrics&apos; Future of Jobs survey of 1,000 employers. Financial services (61%), insurance (58%), education (56%), and automotive/aerospace (54%) round out the top six. Professional services (37%) and infrastructure (39%) rank lowest, but every industry surveyed expects more than a third of its workforce to need AI skills by 2030.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-crawl-purpose-breakdown-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What AI Crawlers Actually Do, May 2026: 45% Training, 9% Search</image:title>
      <image:caption>Training is the single largest declared purpose of AI crawling in May 2026, at 44.8% of requests, up from 42.3% in April. Mixed-purpose crawls (models that index for both training and retrieval) account for another 42.7%, down from 47.6%. Search rose to 9.3% of AI crawler traffic, real-time web retrieval on behalf of a user prompt, up from 7.5% in April. User-action crawls (browser-using agents) remain small at 2.6% but continue to grow. Note that Cloudflare reclassified this series after May: an earlier version of this chart showed training at 51.8%, and the figures here reflect the corrected data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-crawler-volume-share-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Top AI Crawlers May 2026: Googlebot 27%, Meta 13%, GPTBot 11%, Bytespider 10%</image:title>
      <image:caption>GPTBot overtook ClaudeBot to become the third-largest AI crawler in May 2026, holding 11.48% of AI bot HTTP requests vs ClaudeBot&apos;s 9.73% — a reversal from April, when ClaudeBot led 11.69% to 9.84%. Bytespider (ByteDance) nearly doubled its share to 10.25% (was 5.73% in April), passing ClaudeBot to become the #4 AI crawler. Googlebot remains the leader but lost about 3 points of share, falling from 30.28% to 27.26%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-crawlers-blocked-by-ecommerce-sites-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which AI Crawlers E-Commerce Sites Block Most in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>E-commerce sites that restrict AI crawlers wall off the training and scraping bots while keeping search open. Among the e-commerce robots.txt files Cloudflare Radar parsed (25 May 2026), the most fully-blocked AI crawlers are PetalBot (34 domains), Bytespider (33), ClaudeBot (31), GPTBot (30) and CCBot (28) — but only 4 fully block Googlebot, which most stores still want for search. Google&apos;s AI-specific crawler, Google-Extended, is fully blocked by 27.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-cybersecurity-market-2023-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Cybersecurity Market 2023-2030: $24B to $134B in Seven Years</image:title>
      <image:caption>The AI cybersecurity market is forecast to grow from $24.3 billion in 2023 to $133.8 billion by 2030 — a 5.5x expansion at roughly 28 percent CAGR. The growth curve accelerates after 2025: each year past 2026 adds more in absolute dollars than the previous one. The driver is the documented breach-cost gap (see the next chart): organizations with extensive AI security automation saved $1.9M per breach in 2024 vs. those with no automation, and that delta is widening.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-data-center-market-size-2026-2034.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Data Center Market Size 2025-2034: $17.7B to $133.5B (25.8% CAGR)</image:title>
      <image:caption>The global AI data center market was valued at $17.73 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow from $21.27 billion in 2026 to $133.51 billion by 2034, a compound annual growth rate of 25.8 percent, according to Fortune Business Insights. This is the dedicated AI data center segment, narrower than the roughly $416 billion total data center market. Estimates of the AI segment vary widely (from $21B to $49B in 2026) because there is no standard definition of what counts as an AI data center.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-deployed-vs-exploring-by-country-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Deployed vs Exploring by Country 2024: China and India Already Past &apos;Exploring&apos;</image:title>
      <image:caption>China (58%) and India (57%) lead in actual AI deployment in 2024 — and they&apos;re the only two countries where the deployed share is higher than the exploring share. Every other country surveyed by Vention still has more organizations exploring AI than deploying it. The US sits at 25% deployed / 43% exploring; the UK at 26% / 47%. The deployed-to-exploring gap is the cleanest signal of which countries are past the experimentation phase and which are still planning.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-digital-experience-use-cases-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Digital Experience Use Cases 2024: Chatbots Lead at 38%</image:title>
      <image:caption>A 2024 survey of marketing leaders in Australia, the UK, and the US found chatbots (38%) and personalization (36%) were the leading AI use cases for delivering digital experiences. Brand intelligence (33%), content intelligence (31%), and product recommendations (31%) rounded out the top five, while content generation tasks like video (29%) and image generation (28%) were close behind.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-engineer-skill-proficiency-devskiller-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Engineer Skill Proficiency 2024: ChatGPT Assistants API Leads at 61.54/100</image:title>
      <image:caption>Even the top AI-related skill (ChatGPT Assistants API) scores just 61.54 out of 100 on DevSkiller&apos;s proficiency assessment. Azure Databricks and Tabnine tie at 60 each. Ethical AI Usage scores 51.54, Google Gemini (Bard) 43.13, and Data Literacy 41.54. The intermediate ceiling reflects how recently most of these tools entered the market — there has not been time for a generation of engineers to climb to expert-level proficiency.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-handling-complex-tasks-developers-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Developer Rating of AI on Complex Tasks 2024: Only 3.3% Say &apos;Very Well&apos;</image:title>
      <image:caption>Only 3.3 percent of developers rate AI as very well at handling complex tasks. 32.7 percent say good but not great; 31.3 percent say bad; 11.9 percent say very poor; 20.8 percent are neutral. Combined, 43.2 percent rate AI as bad or worse at complex work. That is the detail the industry narrative misses when claiming AI replaces senior engineers: AI augments authoring but struggles at complex reasoning.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-in-marketing-market-value-2020-2028.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI in Marketing Market Value 2020-2028: $12B to $107.5B</image:title>
      <image:caption>The market for AI in marketing was estimated at $15.84 billion in 2021 and is projected to reach more than $107.5 billion by 2028 — roughly 9x growth across the period. Values from 2021 onward are forecasts calculated by Statista based on figures from The Insight Partners.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-influencer-marketing-adoption-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI in Influencer Marketing 2025: 60% of Marketers Already Use It</image:title>
      <image:caption>During a 2025 survey of marketing agencies and brands, about 38 percent said they were using AI for influencer marketing on a limited basis and 22.4 percent were using it extensively — meaning roughly 60 percent were already using AI. Another 30.3 percent were not yet using it but exploring options, while just 9.5 percent had no plans to adopt it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-influencer-marketing-applications-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI in Influencer Marketing 2026: Creator Discovery Leads at 37%</image:title>
      <image:caption>In a March 2026 study, 36.67 percent of marketers said they applied AI to influencer marketing for creator discovery, the most common use, followed by content generation (21.11 percent) and brief development (13.89 percent). Just over 10 percent reported not using AI at all, showing adoption is already mainstream across the workflow.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-investment-leaders-by-country-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Investment Leaders 2025: U.S. at $471B Dwarfs Every Other Country</image:title>
      <image:caption>The U.S. ($471B) is investing roughly 4x more in AI than China ($119B) — and the gap between the top two and the rest is even more extreme. The UK ($28B), Canada ($15B), and Israel ($15B) round out the top five, but every country outside the top two sits below $30B. AI investment is the most concentrated metric in the entire dataset: the top two countries account for over 80 percent of tracked AI capital allocation.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-market-growth-2021-2031.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Market Growth Rate 2021-2031: 35% in 2024 Tapering to 23.5% by 2031</image:title>
      <image:caption>The global artificial intelligence market grew 34.75% year-over-year in 2024 and is forecast to maintain growth rates between 23.5% and 31% through 2031, according to Statista Market Insights. After peaking at 117.21% in 2021 and contracting 38.4% in 2022 during the post-ZIRP correction, the AI market entered a &apos;mature high-growth&apos; phase. The forecast deceleration of just 11.21 percentage points over 2024-2031 is unusually flat for a market this size, signaling sustained double-digit growth through the end of the decade.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-market-size-forecast-2020-2031.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Global AI Market Forecast 2020-2031: $94B to $1.67 Trillion</image:title>
      <image:caption>The global AI market is forecast to grow from $94.81 billion in 2020 to $1.675 trillion by 2031 — a 17.7x expansion over the decade. Between 2026 and 2031 alone, the market is projected to add $1.3 trillion (+382.65 percent). Growth is not linear: 2022 dipped to $126.78B from the 2021 surge to $206.34B before resuming its long-term trajectory. The strongest compounding happens after 2027.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-market-size-worldwide-2020-2031.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Global AI Market Size 2020-2031: $94.81B to Forecast $1.675 Trillion</image:title>
      <image:caption>The global AI market is forecast to grow from $94.81 billion in 2020 to $1.675 trillion in 2031, a 17.7x expansion in eleven years. The $1.3 trillion of new market value created between 2026 and 2031 (+382.65%) is roughly the size of Australia&apos;s GDP added to a single software category. The 2022 dip from $206B (2021) to $127B reflects a brief funding pullback before the generative-AI wave resumed the trajectory.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-marketing-automation-uses-b2b-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Marketing Automation for B2B 2025: Targeting Leads at 43%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Among B2B marketers surveyed in February 2025, about 43 percent named targeting audiences as the most effective application of AI in marketing automation. Analytics and reporting followed at 41 percent, ahead of personalization (36%), email marketing (35%), and content creation (35%). Campaign and channel optimization ranked last at 17 percent.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-marketing-budget-allocation-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Marketing Budget Allocation 2024: 48% Spend Under 10%</image:title>
      <image:caption>According to a 2024 survey, roughly 48 percent of marketers allocated less than 10 percent of their marketing budget to AI-driven campaigns. Another 33.4 percent dedicated between 10 and 40 percent, while 19 percent committed over 40 percent of budget to AI. Most organizations are still testing AI with small budget slices rather than betting the bulk of spend on it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-pc-share-of-shipments-2025-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI PC Share of Shipments: 31% in 2025 to 54.7% in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>AI PCs jump from 31 percent of worldwide PC shipments in 2025 to 54.7 percent in 2026 — a 23.7 percentage-point leap in a single year. That kind of swing is unusually steep for the PC category. AI PCs cross the majority threshold a full year before smartphones do, because the PC refresh cycle is shorter and more predictable.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-pc-shipments-worldwide-2024-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI PC Shipments 2024-2026: 38M to Forecast 143M (Nearly 4x)</image:title>
      <image:caption>AI PC shipments grow from 38.15 million units in 2024 to a forecast 143.11 million in 2026, nearly 4x in two years. The growth is steep because AI PCs require a new processor generation (NPUs on-die), which makes the refresh cycle compulsory rather than optional.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-platform-crawl-to-refer-ratios-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Crawl-to-Refer Ratio 2026: Anthropic Crawls 11,122 Pages per 1 Referral</image:title>
      <image:caption>Anthropic&apos;s ClaudeBot crawled 11,122 pages for every 1 human visit Anthropic sent back to the web in the week of May 25 to June 1, 2026, per Cloudflare Radar&apos;s CRAWL_REFER_RATIO endpoint. That improved from 13,528:1 in April but is still the worst ratio of any major operator. OpenAI&apos;s ratio is 857:1, down from 1,252:1. Perplexity moved the wrong way, from 95:1 to 190:1. Google&apos;s traditional Googlebot operates at 5:1. This asymmetry is the structural reason publishers have started blocking AI crawlers in robots.txt.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-robotics-market-growth-2021-2031.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Robotics Growth 2021-2031: 35.28% in 2024, Smoothest AI Curve</image:title>
      <image:caption>The global AI robotics market grew 35.28% year-over-year in 2024 and is forecast to decelerate to 23.52% by 2031, according to Statista Market Insights. AI robotics is the only AI segment in the Statista dossier without a 2022 contraction, with growth rates running steadily between 35-37% from 2021 through 2024 before a gradual taper. The 11.76 percentage points of deceleration over 2024-2031 is the gentlest decline of any AI segment — robotics revenue is tied to physical product shipments, which creates a smoother growth profile than software-only AI.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-robotics-market-size-2020-2031.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Robotics Market 2020-2031: $17.14B in 2024 to $94.14B by 2031 (19x)</image:title>
      <image:caption>The global AI robotics market reached $17.14 billion in 2024 and is forecast to grow to $94.14 billion by 2031, according to Statista Market Insights — a 19x expansion across the eleven-year series. The 2024 inflection point reflects the commercial takeoff of humanoid robotics, warehouse automation, and AI-enabled industrial arms, as startups and established robot manufacturers began shipping at scale. AI robotics is the only segment in the Statista AI dossier without a 2022 contraction — physical product revenue is structurally smoother than software-only categories.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-share-unicorn-births-2015-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Share of New Unicorns 2015-2025: From 6% to 53%</image:title>
      <image:caption>In 2025, 53 percent of new unicorn births worldwide were AI startups — up from 6 percent in 2015 and 44 percent in 2024. Growth accelerated sharply between 2023 and 2025, roughly tripling the AI share of new billion-dollar companies in three years. CB Insights reports that one in five new unicorns in 2025 are AI agents.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-tools-purpose-influencer-marketing-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Tools in Influencer Marketing 2025: NLP Leads at 49%</image:title>
      <image:caption>In a survey published at the end of 2025, almost half (49 percent) of marketers reported using AI tools for natural language processing in influencer marketing. Machine learning tools followed at nearly 29 percent, ahead of deepfake technology (24.3%) and predictive analytics (22.3%). About 18 percent said they did not use AI tools at all.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-usage-ecommerce-marketing-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Use in Ecommerce Marketing 2024: Customer Service Leads at 37%</image:title>
      <image:caption>A 2024 survey found customer service and support was the leading application of AI in ecommerce marketing, named by 37 percent of responding ecommerce marketers. Data analysis and image generation ranked second, both cited by 36 percent. The spread is tight — even copy generation and administrative tasks reached 30 percent.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-usage-rate-by-country-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Consumer AI Usage by Country 2025: India and Nigeria Lead at 92%</image:title>
      <image:caption>In 2025, India and Nigeria reported the world&apos;s highest consumer AI usage rates at 92 percent each, followed by UAE (91%), Egypt (90%), and China (89%). Emerging economies dominate the top of the list — every country with 85%+ usage is classified as an emerging market. Advanced economies such as Singapore (73%) trail the leaders by nearly 20 percentage points.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-use-organizations-by-region-2023-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Organizational AI Adoption 2023-2025: 88% Global, Europe Leads at 91%</image:title>
      <image:caption>88% of organizations worldwide used artificial intelligence in at least one business function in 2025, up from 55% in 2023 — a 33-percentage-point jump in two years, according to McKinsey &amp; Company and Stanford University&apos;s State of AI survey. Europe leads regions at 91% adoption (up from 57% in 2023), followed by North America (90%) and Greater China and developing markets (88%). Asia-Pacific is the regional laggard at 82% but still gained 24 percentage points over two years. Greater China posted the largest single-year jump (75% to 88%) between 2024 and 2025.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-users-worldwide-2020-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Users Worldwide 2020-2030: From 116M to 729M</image:title>
      <image:caption>The global AI user base is projected to grow from 115.9 million in 2020 to 729.1 million by 2030 — a 6.3x expansion. The 500M threshold is expected to be crossed by 2028. User growth is consistent year-over-year with no dip, in contrast to the revenue series which contracted in 2022.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-vendor-adoption-rate-by-company-size-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Vendor Adoption Rate by Company Size (May 2026)</image:title>
      <image:caption>Across 22.03 million LinkedIn-enriched corporate domains in our July 2025 – March 2026 crawl, named AI vendor adoption sits at 1.50% blended. The shape is a U-curve, not a log climb: the 1–10 band carries 1.86% (mostly Perplexity-bundled widgets), the mid-market (201–500 employees) is the floor at 0.43%, and only the 10,001+ band breaks above 2% at 4.17%. Stanford AI Index 2026&apos;s headline 88% adoption number — sourced from McKinsey&apos;s State of AI 2025 survey — measures something different: organizational self-reports, with internal use and SaaS-bundled AI both counted. The gap to our website-layer measurement is largest at the very top of the enterprise distribution and at the very bottom of the small-business one.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ai-visual-app-consumer-spend-by-country-2023-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AI Visual App Consumer Spend by Country 2023-2024: US Tops at 66.3%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Between January 2023 and December 2024, the United States registered over 66 percent of global consumer spend on AI graphic editing and generator apps. China ranked a distant second at 6.3 percent, followed by the United Kingdom at 5.6 percent. The concentration shows how heavily AI creative-app revenue skews toward the US market.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/airtable-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Airtable? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 55.07% of Airtable customers we can place by country, followed by the United Kingdom at 8.01%. France ranks third at 5.69%, ahead of Australia, Canada, and Germany, which is unusual for a US workplace tool. Notion shows almost the same French share at 5.61%, roughly double what Slack, Miro, or Atlassian record, so this looks like a French preference for flexible workspace tools rather than something specific to Airtable.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/airtable-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Airtable the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>No single industry passes 4.79%, which is what a genuinely horizontal tool looks like. Software Development leads at 4.79%, but Non-profit Organizations rank second at 4.50% and Venture Capital and Private Equity firms rank fourth at 3.44%, both far above where they land for comparable tools.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/airtable-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Airtable Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>65.97% of Airtable customers employ fewer than 50 people, the highest small-company share of any domain-verified tool in this category, above Slack (60.93%) and Notion (60.82%). Only 8.92% employ more than 1,000. The household names at the top of the list are real, but they are the exception: Airtable&apos;s distribution is a long tail of small teams with a short enterprise head, not an enterprise rollout.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/airtable-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Airtable Market Share Among Productivity &amp; Collaboration</image:title>
      <image:caption>Airtable holds 2.83% of the Productivity &amp; Collaboration category, ranking #9 of 44 technologies TechnologyChecker.io tracks there. It sits just ahead of Notion (10,210 domains) and behind Smartsheet (13,744), Miro (17,400), and Slack (19,283). Atlassian leads the category at roughly 34% because its signal spans Jira, Confluence, and Trello together, so the gap to every standalone tool is wide by design.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/airtable-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Airtable Usage Statistics 2016-2026: 10,987 Verified Domains</image:title>
      <image:caption>Airtable appears on 10,987 domains in our live crawl, up from 9,600 when our current detection began reporting in June 2026. Our long-run detection history tracks the earlier climb, from 2 domains at the end of 2016 to 5,973 by December 2024. The step between the two segments reflects widening coverage as much as new adoption, so read each segment on its own rather than as one continuous curve.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/akamai-bot-manager-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Akamai Bot Manager? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Akamai Bot Manager the most? The United States dominates with 63.5% of enriched customers, and the footprint reaches 124 countries in total. Australia (4.4%) and the United Kingdom (3.0%) follow, with Germany (2.9%), Brazil (2.7%) and Canada (2.6%) close behind. English-speaking countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia) account for 73.6% of the base, based on our analysis of 12,827 enriched companies. That concentration tracks Akamai&apos;s history as a Boston-founded CDN with its deepest enterprise relationships in North America.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/akamai-bot-manager-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Akamai Bot Manager the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use Akamai Bot Manager the most? Retail leads at 17.06%, followed by Motor Vehicle Manufacturing (12.23%), Government Administration (5.57%) and Banking (5.23%). Group the automotive entries together, Motor Vehicle Manufacturing, Automotive (3.78%) and Retail Motor Vehicles (2.28%), and the sector reaches 18.3%, edging past retail as the single largest concentration. That is a sharper vertical tilt than bot protection usually shows, and it fits the threat: carmakers and dealer networks publish inventory, pricing and configurator data that competitors and resellers scrape continuously.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/akamai-bot-manager-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Akamai Bot Manager Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Akamai Bot Manager? This is the most enterprise-weighted customer base in the category, by a wide margin. 6.9% of Akamai Bot Manager customers have 10,001+ employees (845 companies), against 0.18% for reCAPTCHA, and another 11.9% sit in the 1,001-10,000 band. The small end is real but thin: 24.9% have 1-10 employees, against reCAPTCHA&apos;s 64.2%. Put the two together and the shape is clear, this is a product bought by large organisations, with a modest tail of small sites that sit behind an Akamai contract they did not sign themselves.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/akamai-bot-manager-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Akamai Bot Manager Market Share Among Bot Detection &amp; CAPTCHA</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Akamai Bot Manager&apos;s market share? Akamai Bot Manager holds a 0.48% share of the bot detection and CAPTCHA market, ranking #5 of 32 tracked products, behind reCAPTCHA (65.26%), Cloudflare Bot Management (26.04%), Cloudflare Turnstile (3.68%) and hCaptcha (3.44%), based on our monthly crawl of 28.2M domains at TechnologyChecker.io. Share of detected domains is the wrong yardstick for this product, though. The four names above it are all free or freemium widgets that a solo developer can paste into a page; Bot Manager is a six-figure enterprise contract that arrives bundled with Akamai delivery. A rank of #5 by domain count and a customer list of McDonald&apos;s, IBM, Microsoft and Wells Fargo are describing two different things.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/akamai-mpulse-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Akamai mPulse? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 11,192 matched companies, or 51.47% of those with a known country, followed by the United Kingdom at 6.71% (1,458), India at 4.13% (897), Canada at 3.56% (774) and Germany at 3.17% (690). The Indian share runs above the corpus norm and reflects the systems integrators that appear near the top of the named list.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/akamai-mpulse-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Akamai mPulse the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 6.97%, followed by Restaurants (5.57%), Real Estate (4.02%), Government Administration (3.91%) and Hospitality (3.54%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/akamai-mpulse-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Akamai mPulse Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Companies of 1 to 10 employees make up 50.86% of matched domains. That figure describes deployment rather than purchasing: mPulse is typically bought once by a large organisation and then applied across brand, campaign and regional domains that resolve to smaller local entities. Organisations above 1,000 employees account for 9.06% of matched domains, and that is where the licence is held.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/akamai-mpulse-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Akamai mPulse Market Share Among APM &amp; Error Tracking</image:title>
      <image:caption>Akamai mPulse holds 1.82% of the APM &amp; Error Tracking category and ranks 7th of 50 tracked technologies. The category is dominated by Sentry at 71.99%, whose free and open-source error SDK ships in a very large number of projects. mPulse is a licensed enterprise product measuring a narrower thing, real user page performance, so domain count understates its standing among paying customers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/algolia-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Algolia? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Algolia the most? The United States leads with 9,671 companies, 44.1% of the enriched base, but France ranks second at 1,603, ahead of the United Kingdom (1,573). Algolia was founded in Paris in 2012 and the home market still shows clearly, the same pattern we see on other French-founded products. Australia (945), Canada (749), Germany (723) and the Netherlands (627) follow, with a notably European tail through Belgium (320), Italy (278), Norway (251) and Switzerland (234).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/algolia-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Algolia the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 10.61%, the largest single-industry share in this refresh batch, followed by Software Development (6.61%). Third place is the surprise: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing at 5.64%, and adding Automotive (1.8%) the vehicle cluster reaches 7.44%. That is not a sector normally associated with search infrastructure, and the reason is catalogue shape — a parts and accessories catalogue runs to hundreds of thousands of SKUs with fitment rules, and finding the right component for a specific model and year is a search problem before it is a commerce one. Technology and Internet (4.59%) and Financial Services (2.53%) follow.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/algolia-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Algolia Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Algolia? The distribution is more enterprise-weighted than most developer tools we track. 47.69% have 1-10 employees — low by this batch&apos;s standards, where 60-75% is typical — with 24.18% at 11-50 and a solid middle: 15.03% at 51-200, 5.72% at 201-500 and 3% at 1,001-5,000. In total 12.41% have more than 200 employees. Based on 21,909 enriched companies. Search quality becomes a commercial problem only once a catalogue or documentation set is large enough to get lost in, which is why this base skews larger than a typical API product.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/algolia-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Algolia Market Share Among Site Search</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Algolia&apos;s market share? Algolia holds 21.63% of the Site Search category on 36,276 domains, ranking #2 of 58 behind FiboSearch (43,926 domains, 26.19%). That first place needs qualifying: FiboSearch is a free WooCommerce plugin, so its footprint is a function of WordPress commerce rather than a competing search platform, and it cannot be deployed anywhere WooCommerce is not. The same applies to most of the rest of the leaderboard — Doofinder (13,399), Searchanise (10,405), Klevu (10,028) and Boost Commerce (7,850) are all storefront plugins for Shopify or WooCommerce. Algolia is a platform-agnostic search API, and among products that work anywhere it leads the category outright.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/all-in-one-accessibility-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use All in One Accessibility? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use All in One Accessibility the most? The United States accounts for 50.74% of enriched companies with a country on file, 1,621 of them, followed by Germany at 9.01% and Spain at 4.82%. That American share is lower than almost anything else we track, and the European countries behind it, with the United Kingdom at 4.44%, Italy at 3.51% and Poland at 3.38%, suggest European accessibility rules are driving purchases here as much as US litigation is, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/all-in-one-accessibility-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use All in One Accessibility the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Medical Practices is the largest vertical at 13.49% of the top ten industries we show, with Non-profit Organizations (11.66%) and Hospitals and Health Care (11.42%) close behind. Combine the two healthcare labels and healthcare is comfortably the leading buyer. Nothing dominates otherwise, since the whole top ten sits between 13.49% and 7.9%, which is what a horizontal product sold on compliance worry looks like, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/all-in-one-accessibility-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>All in One Accessibility Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use All in One Accessibility? Small ones, mostly. 53.39% of enriched companies employ ten people or fewer and another 26.66% sit in the 11 to 50 band, based on our matched company records with a headcount on file. The tail is thin but real: 3.75% land between 201 and 500 staff, and the largest detections in our table include RBL Bank and TDK Corp.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/all-in-one-accessibility-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>All in One Accessibility Market Share Among Accessibility Tools</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is All in One Accessibility&apos;s market share? It holds 1.05% of the Accessibility Tools category and ranks #11 of the 47 technologies we track across 430,588 detected domains, a long way behind UserWay (35.57%) and accessiBe (21.9%). Share is a poor guide to fit here, because the category label covers three different products: overlay widgets, text-to-speech built for public sector sites, and document remediation services. Figures come from our monthly crawl of 29.9M active domains at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/all-in-one-accessibility-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>All in One Accessibility Usage Statistics 2022-2026: 4,680 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>All in One Accessibility first appears in our long-run detection history in October 2022 on a single domain and reaches 4,680 active domains in our August 2026 crawl. Counts either side of the 2025-to-2026 gap are not like-for-like, because the set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly discovered ones added, and our detection signals widen over time, so the step across that gap is wider coverage rather than a surge in adoption. Within the older half the widget climbed from 716 domains in December 2024 to 1,185 by July 2025, and it did that while our crawled universe was shrinking its own universe.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/all-in-one-seo-pack-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use All in One SEO Pack? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use All in One SEO Pack the most? The United States leads at 36.2% — the highest US concentration of the three major SEO plugins, against Yoast&apos;s 31.8% and RankMath&apos;s 29.0% — followed by the United Kingdom at 10.1%, India at 7.1%, Germany at 6.6%, Australia at 5.1% and Canada at 4.9%, across 347,438 enriched companies. Yoast&apos;s European strength is the mirror image of this: it reads 8.7% in Germany, 7.6% in France, 6.8% in the Netherlands and 6.2% in Spain, where All in One SEO Pack reaches none of those levels.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/all-in-one-seo-pack-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use All in One SEO Pack the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Construction leads at 4.59%, followed by IT Services &amp; Consulting at 3.96%, Business Consulting &amp; Services at 3.71%, Advertising Services at 3.15% and Real Estate at 2.7%. No vertical reaches 5%, and the top ten together account for under a third of the base. That flatness is a property of WordPress rather than of the plugin. Yoast SEO and RankMath produce the same shape with Construction leading at 5.05% and 4.96% respectively.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/all-in-one-seo-pack-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>All in One SEO Pack Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use All in One SEO Pack? 63.2% have 1-10 employees with the equivalent bands merged, 23.39% have 11-50 and 7.82% have 51-200. The distribution is within a point or two of both competitors on every band — all three install into WordPress, so all three inherit WordPress&apos;s size curve rather than expressing a market of their own.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/all-in-one-seo-pack-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>All in One SEO Pack Market Share Among SEO Tools</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is All in One SEO Pack&apos;s market share? It holds 11.16% of the SEO Tools category with 606,876 domains, ranking 3rd of 48 behind Yoast SEO (68.87%) and RankMath (17.28%). Those three are 97.31% of the category&apos;s 5.44 million domains. Being the oldest plugin in the category has not translated into position: All in One SEO Pack predates Yoast by three years and RankMath by eleven, and sits third.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/allyant-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Allyant? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Allyant the most? The United States accounts for 62.94% of enriched companies that have a country on file, with Canada second at 14.29% and the United Kingdom third at 7.99%. Canada&apos;s slice is unusually large for a vendor whose marquee accounts are US federal and healthcare. After that the tail thins fast, through Finland (1.91%), Australia (1.49%) and France (1.41%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/allyant-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Allyant the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Medical Practices is the largest vertical at 35.39% of the top ten industries we display, with Hospitals and Health Care second at 24.82%. Put those two together and healthcare is just over 60% of that top ten, a concentration we rarely see outside vertical software. Hospitality (6.87%) and Retail (6.16%) follow, and no other vertical passes 5.2%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/allyant-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Allyant Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Allyant only for large organisations? The data says no. 45.21% of enriched companies have ten or fewer employees and another 25.68% sit in the 11 to 50 band, so roughly seven in ten are under 50 people, based on the 1,461 companies we matched to headcount records. The giants are still there, just rare: 40 companies at 10,001+ staff, which is where Veterans Affairs, UnitedHealth Group and Walgreens land.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/allyant-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Allyant Market Share Among Accessibility Tools</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Allyant&apos;s market share? Allyant holds 0.43% of the Accessibility Tools category and ranks #14 of the 47 technologies we track there, far behind UserWay (35.57%) and accessiBe (21.9%). That comparison flatters the widget vendors. A script tag installs across thousands of sites in an afternoon, while remediation work is scoped per contract, so share of detected domains understates the revenue sitting behind each Allyant detection.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/allyant-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Allyant Usage Statistics 2020-2026: 1,919 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Allyant first appears in our long-run detection history in January 2020 on a single domain, reaching 644 by July 2025. Our current crawl picked it up at 1,734 domains in June 2026 and 1,919 in August 2026. Mind the gap in the chart: counts either side of it are not like-for-like, because the set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly discovered ones added, and our detection signals widen over time, so the step across it is wider coverage rather than a wave of new customers. Inside the crawl the growth is 1.09x, against a corpus that grew 1.18x over the same months, which is a slow loss of relative share.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/almalinux-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use AlmaLinux? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use AlmaLinux the most? The United States leads with 1,757 matched domains (22.1%) and the Netherlands sits 12 behind on 1,745 (22.0%). That near-tie is not Dutch companies picking a distribution, it is a hosting market: cPanel ended CentOS support and lists AlmaLinux among its supported systems, and a shared-hosting estate that converts takes every site on it along. The evidence is in who is missing. Not one of the 34 largest organisations named below is Dutch, while Brazil, on 402 matched domains against the Netherlands&apos; 1,745, supplies three of them. South Africa (408) is third, Brazil fourth and the United Kingdom (325) fifth, out of the 7,948 domains we matched to a company record.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/almalinux-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use AlmaLinux the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>No industry breaks 5%. IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 4.54%, then Retail (4.45%), Construction (3.89%) and Real Estate (2.86%), and the ten largest industries together cover only 31.15% of the 6,712 companies with a recorded industry in our enriched company data. That flatness is what a general-purpose server operating system should look like. The absence is more interesting than the ranking: Higher Education does not appear among the twelve largest industries we hold, which puts it under 1.8% of the classified base, even though 21 of the 34 largest organisations we name are universities or research institutes.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/almalinux-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AlmaLinux Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is AlmaLinux only for small operators? By volume, yes. 67.53% of the 7,028 companies we can size employ 10 people or fewer, and adding the 11-to-50 band takes that to 86.95%. That is the shape of a free operating system reaching people through shared hosting rather than one sold into data centres. The head of the distribution is a different population: only 10 companies in our enriched company data sit in the 10,001+ band, 0.14%, and three of them are in the named list below, including the University of Kentucky.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/almalinux-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AlmaLinux Market Share Among Operating Systems</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is AlmaLinux&apos;s market share? AlmaLinux holds 1.64% of the Operating Systems category and ranks 5th of 16 on 13,392 domains, behind Ubuntu (409,810 / 50.33%), UNIX (209,466 / 25.73%), Debian (130,134 / 15.98%) and CentOS (32,041 / 3.94%). Two comparisons say more than the rank does. AlmaLinux now stands at 41.8% of the CentOS footprint it was built to replace, and it is detected on more domains than Windows Server (6,467) and Red Hat (5,300) put together, based on our monthly crawl of more than 50M domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-alb-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Amazon ALB? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Amazon ALB the most? The United States takes 52.59% of the 31,131 companies where we hold a country — 16,372 domains, more than seven times the United Kingdom&apos;s 2,082. Australia (1,461) and Canada (1,405) follow, and the concentration is unsurprising given AWS regional history and the enterprise-portal shape of the population.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-alb-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Amazon ALB the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads the Amazon ALB industry mix at 5.11% of the 28,025 companies we can classify, ahead of Individual and Family Services (4.90%) and Hospitality (4.34%). No industry clears 6%, which is the honest headline: an application load balancer is horizontal infrastructure, and nothing in this distribution suggests a vertical specialism.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-alb-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon ALB Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Amazon ALB? Small firms dominate by count — 47.88% of the 30,497 sized companies have 1-10 employees — but the tail is what distinguishes ALB from a shared-hosting technology. 1,217 companies in the 1,001-5,000 band and 490 above 10,000 employees run it, and those are the organisations whose portals appear at the top of the company list.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-alb-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon ALB Market Share Among Load Balancers &amp; Proxies</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Amazon ALB&apos;s market share? Amazon ALB holds 22.81% of Load Balancers &amp; Proxies on 69,748 domains, second behind Envoy. One caution on the trend: ALB&apos;s share rose across our three rollups largely because Envoy&apos;s reading halved between June and July, so the category denominator moved under everyone. Hold Envoy at its June figure and ALB&apos;s August share is 17.25%, not 22.81%. The rank is solid; the share gain is not a claim we will make.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-cloudfront-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Amazon CloudFront? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States leads with 66,917 domains (36.71%), then the United Kingdom on 18,197 (9.98%), Brazil on 11,197 (6.14%), India on 10,172 (5.58%) and Australia on 8,607 (4.72%). Percentages are over the 182,287 CloudFront domains where we hold a country. CloudFront is notably less US-concentrated than Amazon S3 (46.26%), despite both being AWS products measured in the same crawl. Brazil placing third is the clearest regional signal in the AWS family.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-cloudfront-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Amazon CloudFront the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 8.89%, followed by IT Services (5.99%), Technology and Internet (5.18%), Retail (5.02%) and Financial Services (4.12%), across the 173,229 CloudFront domains carrying an industry label. Nothing reaches double figures, the expected shape for horizontal infrastructure. CloudFront&apos;s top industry does run higher than S3&apos;s (6.05%), and the difference is informative: a CDN is configured deliberately by whoever runs the site, so the distribution leans toward organisations with engineering teams rather than tracking the shape of the web at large.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-cloudfront-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon CloudFront Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>52.41% of enriched CloudFront domains belong to companies with 1-10 staff and 3.90% to companies above 1,000, across 179,930 domains with a size band. That is the most enterprise-weighted profile of the delivery and deployment products we publish: S3 is 2.34% above 1,000, Vercel 0.89% and Netlify 0.79%. Because every CloudFront clause is first-party, that enterprise weighting is a statement about who configures the service rather than about who happens to load an asset from it. The named detections bear it out: Accenture, Siemens, Wells Fargo, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, PepsiCo, CVS Health, Allianz and the US Air Force all appear.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-cloudfront-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon CloudFront Market Share Among CDN</image:title>
      <image:caption>CloudFront holds 2.04% of the CDN category on 397,677 domains, ninth of 50. Cloudflare leads overwhelmingly at 47.33% on 9,236,181 domains. Most of the names above CloudFront in that table are not CDN services at all. cdnjs (11.12%), jsDelivr (11.05%), Google Hosted Libraries (8.15%) and jQuery CDN are public script-hosting endpoints that any site can load a library from without buying anything. CloudFront is a paid service a domain owner configures. Among products that actually compete for that decision, CloudFront ranks second behind Cloudflare and ahead of Fastly (0.49%), Bunny (0.74%) and StackPath (0.55%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-elb-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Amazon ELB? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Amazon ELB the most? The United States takes 63.75% of the 6,453 companies where we hold a country — 4,114 domains against 359 for the United Kingdom. That is 11 points more US-concentrated than Amazon ALB, and the tenant fleet described above is the reason: those sites are US youth-sports leagues almost without exception.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-elb-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Amazon ELB the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 12.31% of the 5,468 classifiable companies, but the second row is the one that needs explaining. Spectator Sports at 10.74% is not a market for load balancers; it is 587 US youth-sports league sites belonging to one hosting platform, and it is the visible tip of a 3,837-domain fleet.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-elb-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon ELB Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Amazon ELB? 57.24% of the 6,209 sized companies have 1-10 employees. Treat that figure with care rather than as a finding about load balancers — the 3,837-domain platform fleet is made up of small volunteer-run sports organisations, and it lands almost entirely in this band. The enterprise end of the list, from Hewlett Packard Enterprise to Toyota, is where the independent deployments sit.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-elb-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon ELB Market Share Among Load Balancers &amp; Proxies</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Amazon ELB&apos;s market share? Amazon ELB holds 5.33% of Load Balancers &amp; Proxies on 16,312 domains, fifth of twelve. Its detection surface is actually wider than Amazon ALB&apos;s — we match either an AWSELB cookie or a Server: awselb header, where ALB is cookie-only — so the four-to-one gap between them understates rather than exaggerates how far ahead the newer balancer is.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-pay-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Amazon Pay? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Amazon Pay the most? The United States dominates with 80.01% of enriched companies — the most US-concentrated distribution of any payment method we track — followed by Germany at 8.46%. The United Kingdom (1.24%), India (0.95%), Italy (0.88%) and Spain (0.64%) trail well behind. Germany&apos;s second place is the notable result and a real one: Amazon&apos;s retail brand and Prime penetration there are strong enough to make an Amazon-account checkout button worth adding.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-pay-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Amazon Pay the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail is the dominant industry at 18.6%, followed by Retail Apparel and Fashion (9.63%) and Manufacturing (5.89%). Retail-adjacent verticals together account for well over a quarter of the base, with Wellness and Fitness Services (3.27%) and Food and Beverage Services (3.23%) behind them. This is the most consumer-commerce-weighted distribution in the category, which is exactly what an express-checkout button for shoppers should look like.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-pay-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon Pay Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Amazon Pay only for small businesses? Overwhelmingly. 73.87% of Amazon Pay domains belong to companies with 1-10 employees and 20.23% to companies of 11-50, so 94% of the base is under 50 people. Only 11 organisations in our 18,685-company enriched sample have 10,001+ employees. That is the shape of a Shopify app-store install: cheap to add, added by very small merchants, and largely invisible at enterprise scale.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-pay-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon Pay Market Share Among Payment Processing</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Amazon Pay&apos;s market share? Amazon Pay holds 0.8% of the Payment Processing category, ranking #11. Read that alongside how the category is measured: the rows above it are a mix of genuine processors (Stripe at 2.62%) and accepted-card logos rendered by Shopify, and Amazon Pay sits partly in the second group itself — 91.6% of its detected domains run Shopify. With an estimated 720,000+ merchants worldwide, Amazon Pay competes less on domain count than on conversion lift: merchants report 35% higher conversion versus native checkout (per a Comscore study, Oct 2021 – Mar 2022).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-s3-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Amazon S3? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States leads with 140,580 domains (46.26%), followed by the United Kingdom on 26,150 (8.61%), Brazil on 15,316 (5.04%) and India on 12,596 (4.15%). Percentages are computed over the 303,872 S3 domains where we hold a country, not over all 659,040. S3 is the most US-weighted of the deployment and storage profiles we publish, ahead of CloudFront at 36.71% and Netlify at 33.64%. That fits a service sold heavily through AWS&apos;s home market.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-s3-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Amazon S3 the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 6.05%, with Retail close behind at 5.68%, then Financial Services (4.60%), IT Services (4.09%) and Real Estate (3.81%), across the 277,914 S3 domains carrying an industry label. No industry reaches 7%, and that flatness is the finding. A product with a specific buyer spikes somewhere. S3&apos;s distribution is close to the shape of the general web, which is consistent with a signal that fires on asset delivery rather than on a purchasing decision. The same flatness appears on AWS, whose top industry reaches only 8.07%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-s3-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon S3 Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>82.96% of enriched S3 domains belong to companies under 50 staff and 2.34% to companies above 1,000, measured across 301,239 domains carrying a size band. The small-business weighting is real, but it is also what you would expect from a signal that fires on any embedded asset: small sites are the ones most likely to load a widget from a third-party bucket. S3 is meaningfully less small-business-weighted than the deployment platforms in our data. Netlify is 91.32% under 50 and Vercel 89.73%, against S3&apos;s 82.96%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-s3-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon S3 Market Share Among Cloud Infrastructure</image:title>
      <image:caption>Amazon S3 leads the Cloud Infrastructure category with 86.13% share on 659,040 domains, ahead of DigitalOcean Spaces (5.44%), Google Cloud Storage (3.43%) and Alibaba Cloud (2.45%). That 86% is partly a rule-strictness artifact and we would rather say so. Google Cloud Storage is detected only by a response header its own servers emit, which is a strictly first-party signal. Amazon S3 is detected by that kind of header and by any asset URL pointing at an S3 endpoint, which is a much looser net. The two counts are not built the same way, so the 25-to-1 gap between them overstates the real difference in deployment. The ranking is right; the magnitude is not something we would defend to a decimal place.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-ses-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Amazon SES? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Amazon SES the most? The United States dominates with 47,931 companies (33.3%) of all enriched customers. The United Kingdom follows at 13,073 (9.1%) and Australia at 9,043 (6.3%). English-speaking markets account for roughly 53% of the user base, the lowest concentration of the major senders, and SES has meaningful adoption in Brazil (7,469), the Netherlands (5,653), and Germany (5,600). Percentages are shares of the 144,040 SES domains where we have a company country on file, spanning 214 countries in all.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-ses-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Amazon SES the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development is the top industry at 8.03%, followed by IT Services and IT Consulting (6.34%) and Technology, Information and Internet (4.94%). Combined, tech-adjacent industries account for over 19% of SES customers, the highest tech concentration of any platform in this category. No single vertical exceeds 9%, which confirms SES is a horizontal infrastructure tool. Valant Medical Solutions, for example, uses SES for automated patient reminders across 2,500+ behavioral health practices (per their AWS case study), based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-ses-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon SES Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Amazon SES only for large enterprises? Not at all. 45.3% of Amazon SES customers have 1 to 10 employees based on our analysis of 149,649 enriched companies, and 74.5% have fewer than 50. Micro-businesses and startups pick SES for its $0.10 per 1,000 message pricing. Mid-market companies like theMarketer push 6 billion emails per year through SES (per their AWS case study). And at the top, Pfizer, ICICI Bank, and Tata Motors run SES for enterprise notification infrastructure.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-ses-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon SES Market Share Among Email Marketing</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Amazon SES&apos;s market share? Amazon SES holds an 8.26% share of the Email Marketing category, ranking #5, based on our monthly crawl of 28.2M domains and 7,900+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. Even that understates it, because SES is a programmatic email API rather than a marketing campaign tool and a large share of its sending leaves no web-detectable trace. Narrowed to the transactional email category, 6sense ranks SES #3 at 14.28% market share behind SendGrid (23.45%) and Mailgun (18.38%), which is a closer picture of where it actually competes.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-web-services-aws-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Amazon Web Services (AWS)? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Of the 448,710 domains we matched to a company record with a country, 187,397 (41.76%) are United States businesses, followed by the United Kingdom at 8.84% and Australia at 5.87%. Brazil at 4.52% is the notable one: it outranks Canada and Germany, which is unusual in our data and tracks the Sao Paulo region&apos;s pull on Latin American hosting.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-web-services-aws-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Amazon Web Services (AWS) the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>This is the flattest industry distribution on the site. Software Development leads with just 8.07% of 418,231 matched companies, and no industry reaches double figures. Every profile with a real buyer persona shows a spike somewhere. The absence of one here is itself the finding: AWS is horizontal infrastructure, and this table describes the shape of the web more than it describes an AWS customer.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-web-services-aws-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon Web Services (AWS) Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>80.4% of matched companies have fewer than 50 staff and only 2.56% employ more than 1,000. That skew is a property of the signal, not of AWS. A Route 53 hosted zone costs 50 cents a month, so any freelancer who registers a domain through AWS produces the same detection as a bank. Read the small end of this table as domain owners and the 8.14% above 200 staff as the part with a procurement process.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-web-services-aws-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon Web Services (AWS) Market Share Among PaaS</image:title>
      <image:caption>AWS holds 39.98% of the PaaS category across 41 tracked platforms, more than double Vercel at 16.64%. The comparison is looser than it looks. Vercel, Netlify and WordPress.com are places you deploy a site; AWS is the substrate several of them run on top of. Note also that Google has no single platform-level entry in this category, only its CDN, storage and load balancer products, so the share here is computed on a denominator that leaves out one of the three large clouds.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-web-services-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Amazon Web Services? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Of the 448,710 domains we matched to a company record with a country, 187,397 (41.76%) are United States businesses, followed by the United Kingdom at 8.84% and Australia at 5.87%. Brazil at 4.52% is the notable one: it outranks Canada and Germany, which is unusual in our data and tracks the Sao Paulo region&apos;s pull on Latin American hosting.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-web-services-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Amazon Web Services the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>This is the flattest industry distribution on the site. Software Development leads with just 8.07% of 418,231 matched companies, and no industry reaches double figures. Every profile with a real buyer persona shows a spike somewhere. The absence of one here is itself the finding: AWS is horizontal infrastructure, and this table describes the shape of the web more than it describes an AWS customer.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-web-services-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon Web Services Adoption by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>80.4% of matched companies have fewer than 50 staff and only 2.56% employ more than 1,000. That skew is a property of the signal, not of AWS. A Route 53 hosted zone costs 50 cents a month, so any freelancer who registers a domain through AWS produces the same detection as a bank. Read the small end of this table as domain owners and the 8.14% above 200 staff as the part with a procurement process.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amazon-web-services-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amazon Web Services Market Share Among PaaS</image:title>
      <image:caption>AWS holds 39.98% of the PaaS category across 41 tracked platforms, more than double Vercel at 16.64%. The comparison is looser than it looks. Vercel, Netlify and WordPress.com are places you deploy a site; AWS is the substrate several of them run on top of. Note also that Google has no single platform-level entry in this category, only its CDN, storage and load balancer products, so the share here is computed on a denominator that leaves out one of the three large clouds.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/american-express-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use American Express? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries show an Amex payment marker most? The United States leads at 47.3% — three points above Visa and Mastercard, the one genuine difference between the card profiles and consistent with Amex&apos;s stronger US acceptance. The United Kingdom follows at 14.5%, Australia at 8.2%, Canada at 7.7% and Germany at 5.2%, across 178,842 enriched companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/american-express-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use American Express the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 18.48%, with Retail Apparel &amp; Fashion at 9.89%, Manufacturing at 3.78%, Food &amp; Beverage at 3.62% and Wellness &amp; Fitness at 2.96%. The distribution sits within a fifth of a percentage point of Visa&apos;s and Mastercard&apos;s on every line, which is the expected result when three logos share one element.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/american-express-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>American Express Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>77.87% of companies displaying an Amex marker have 1-10 employees and 16.77% have 11-50 — 94.6% under fifty people. That is the Shopify small-merchant curve rather than a statement about Amex acceptance, which historically skews toward larger merchants precisely because of its interchange pricing.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/american-express-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>American Express Market Share Among Payment Processing</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is American Express&apos;s market share? Amex holds 9.99% of the Payment Processing category with 823,048 domains, ranking 6th — directly below Mastercard (10.78%) and Visa (10.79%), which is exactly where a third icon in the same footer list would land. The ordering reflects how often each logo is included, not competitive standing. Its top seven entries — PayPal, Apple Pay, Shop Pay, Visa, Mastercard, American Express and Google Pay — account for 89.09% of all 8.24 million domains in Payment Processing, and are very largely the same Shopify storefronts counted seven times. Stripe, the processor actually moving the money on most of them, ranks 8th at 2.62%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/aminos-ai-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Aminos.AI? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Aminos.AI the most? Which countries use Aminos.AI the most? The United States dominates with 51.8% of all customers (159 companies), but Aminos.AI&apos;s global footprint extends across 12+ countries. Australia (11.4%) and Canada (9.8%) round out the top three. Together, English-speaking countries account for over 73% of the user base, based on our analysis of 322 enriched companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/aminos-ai-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Aminos.AI the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use Aminos.AI the most? Advertising Services is the dominant industry at 10.14%, followed by Marketing Services (6.29%) and Business Consulting (5.24%). The long tail is significant, no single industry exceeds 11%, indicating Aminos.AI is a horizontal platform appealing to service businesses across diverse sectors, based on our analysis of 322 enriched companies on TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/aminos-ai-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Aminos.AI Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Aminos.AI? Is Aminos.AI only for small businesses? Yes, it&apos;s almost exclusively a micro-business platform. With 86% of Aminos.AI customers having 1-10 employees based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io, the platform serves solo entrepreneurs, freelancers, and very small agencies. Only 0.6% have more than 200 employees, confirming its positioning as a tool for independent operators rather than enterprise teams.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/aminos-ai-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Aminos.AI Market Share Among Live Chat &amp; Messaging</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Aminos.AI&apos;s market share? What is Aminos.AI&apos;s market share? Aminos.AI holds a 0.1% share of the AI Chatbots &amp; Assistants market, ranking #2 behind interakt.ai (0.11%) but ahead of Fastbots AI (0.09%), based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. This positions it as a niche player in an emerging category with 35 tracked competitors.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amplitude-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Amplitude? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Amplitude the most? The United States dominates with 45.4% of all enriched customers, consistent with Amplitude&apos;s San Francisco headquarters and its strength among US-based SaaS companies. India (7.3%) and the United Kingdom (6.4%) round out the top three. English-speaking markets (US, UK, Canada, Australia) together account for over 57% of the user base, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amplitude-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Amplitude the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development is the dominant industry at 6.96%, followed by Technology, Information and Internet (5.05%). Combined, tech-adjacent verticals account for over 25% of Amplitude&apos;s customer base. No single industry exceeds 13%, which makes Amplitude a broadly horizontal platform with a strong technology-sector skew, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amplitude-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amplitude Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Amplitude only for startups? Not at all, but small teams are its core. With 60.99% of Amplitude customers having 1-10 employees based on our analysis of 27,946 enriched companies, the platform&apos;s free Starter plan clearly attracts early-stage builders. Still, the top 50 companies in our database are all 10,001+ employee enterprises like Broadcom, NVIDIA and Hewlett Packard Enterprise, proving Amplitude scales to the largest organizations.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amplitude-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amplitude Market Share Among Product Analytics</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Amplitude&apos;s market share?Amplitude holds 28.08% of the product analytics category and ranks #2 of the 16 tools we track, on 73,732 domains. PostHog leads at 45.59% (119,697 domains) and Mixpanel is third at 10.5% (27,566). The gap to PostHog is largely a pricing-model difference rather than a product one: PostHog&apos;s open-source free tier reaches a long tail of very small sites, while Amplitude&apos;s base skews to companies that bought something.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/amplitude-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Amplitude Usage Statistics 2014-2026: 73,732 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>How has Amplitude adoption changed over time?Amplitude enters our records in May 2014 and climbs through the product-led growth years to 16,437 domains in April 2025. Our current crawl detects it on 73,732 domains, having moved from 54,833 in June 2026 to 72,262 in July.Counts either side of that gap are not like-for-like, because the set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly discovered ones added, and our detection signals widen over time. Inside the current window growth has almost stopped: 72,262 to 73,732 is 2.0% in a month, against PostHog&apos;s 12.3%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/angular-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Angular? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 20.32% of Angular companies, a notably thin share for a technology of this size, and Germany takes 10.50%. For comparison, Germany is 3.98% of React Router&apos;s base in the same crawl. Angular is the most European framework in its category by this measure, and Brazil (6.70%) and India (6.99%) both outrank the United Kingdom (4.92%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/angular-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Angular the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development (7.47%) and IT Services and IT Consulting (6.57%) lead, which is unsurprising for a developer framework. Financial Services (4.67%) and Banking (2.32%) together reach 6.99%, and that concentration is the more useful signal.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/angular-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Angular Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Angular&apos;s base is broader at the top than its category neighbours. 13.97% of Angular companies employ more than 200 people, compared with 5.15% of React Router companies and 2.34% of Bluehost&apos;s hosting customers measured the same way in the same crawl. 1.13% employ more than 10,000. Small companies still dominate in absolute terms, at 48.68% in the 1-10 band, because most domains belong to small companies regardless of what they run.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/angular-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Angular Market Share Among JavaScript Frameworks</image:title>
      <image:caption>Angular holds 1.89% of JavaScript Frameworks at rank 11. The number below it in the table is the one worth reading twice: AngularJS sits at 139,752 domains, ahead of the framework built to replace it, despite reaching end of life at the end of 2021. That comparison survives scrutiny. AngularJS is detected partly by a broad script-filename pattern that could in principle over-count, so we checked how many AngularJS detections carry a version string, which only the precise clauses can produce. 93.35% do. Even if every unversioned detection were discarded, AngularJS would still finish ahead of Angular. The legacy framework genuinely has the larger live footprint.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/angularjs-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use AngularJS? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use AngularJS the most? Geographic distribution data for AngularJS is being refreshed. Based on the company data we&apos;ve enriched, the framework&apos;s user base skews heavily toward English-speaking markets with strong representation from India and Western Europe, consistent with its popularity among global IT consulting firms like TCS, Infosys, and Wipro.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/angularjs-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use AngularJS the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Industry distribution data for AngularJS is being refreshed. Based on the top companies detected, IT Services and IT Consulting dominates the user base overwhelmingly. Business Consulting, Professional Services, Banking, and Automation Manufacturing round out the top verticals, reflecting AngularJS&apos;s strength in enterprise internal tooling rather than consumer-facing websites.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/angularjs-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AngularJS Market Share Among JavaScript Frameworks</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is AngularJS&apos;s market share? What is AngularJS&apos;s market share? AngularJS holds a 2.09% share of the JavaScript Frameworks market, ranking #4 behind Vue (6.37%), GSAP (5.69%), and RequireJS (3.06%), based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. For a framework that reached end-of-life over four years ago, maintaining 158K+ active domains shows how deeply embedded it remains in enterprise codebases.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/anthropic-arr-growth-2024-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Anthropic ARR Growth 2024-2026: $1B to $30B Run-Rate in 16 Months (30x)</image:title>
      <image:caption>Anthropic&apos;s annualized revenue grew from $1 billion at the end of 2024 to a reported $30 billion-plus annualized run-rate by April 2026 — a 30x expansion in 16 months. The trajectory crossed $9 billion by year-end 2025 and $14 billion by February 2026 when the company closed its $30 billion Series G at a $380 billion valuation. The full-year 2025 step (1x to 9x) was the steepest, driven by Claude Code (which hit $2.5B run-rate in nine months) and enterprise expansion to 70 percent of the Fortune 100.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/apac-influencer-followers-by-country-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Who Follows Influencers in Asia-Pacific 2025: Philippines Tops at 42.9%</image:title>
      <image:caption>In the second quarter of 2025, 42.9 percent of social media users in the Philippines said they follow influencers or experts, the highest in Asia-Pacific. Thailand (32.9 percent) and Malaysia (32.3 percent) followed, while Japan ranked lowest at 14.4 percent, a roughly threefold gap between the most and least influencer-engaged markets in the region.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/appcues-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Appcues? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Appcues the most? The United States accounts for 2,320 companies (75.7%) and the United Kingdom for 12.1%, with Australia (3.0%), Canada (2.2%) and Germany (1.4%) trailing. Read this distribution with the platform fleet in mind: Zenfolio and Format are both North American photography-portfolio hosts, so a large share of the US and UK counts are their customers rather than Appcues customers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/appcues-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Appcues the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Photography reads 40.12% of Appcues&apos; enriched industry mix, and it is an artifact. Adding Individual &amp; Family Services (12.02%), which is how LinkedIn classifies many portrait studios, brings the photography fleet to just over half the enriched base. The genuine industry profile appears once Zenfolio and Format domains are removed: across the remaining 1,437 independent domains, Software Development leads at 20.05%, followed by Real Estate at 15.32%, Technology &amp; Internet at 7.66%, Financial Services at 5.74% and IT Services at 5.41%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/appcues-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Appcues Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Appcues? 77.05% of detected domains belong to companies with 1-10 employees, with 11.88% at 11-50 and 7.26% at 51-200. That curve is not a statement about Appcues&apos; market — it is the Zenfolio and Format fleet, which is made up of sole-trader wedding and portrait photographers. On the 1,437 independent domains, the size mix shifts toward the software and property companies that buy onboarding tooling directly.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/appcues-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Appcues Market Share Among Website Personalization</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Appcues&apos; market share? Appcues commands a 0.01% share of the user onboarding market, ranking #21 in the category based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. The user onboarding category is dominated by Age Gate (19.16%), while specialized product adoption tools like Appcues, Pendo, and WalkMe compete in a niche segment focused on SaaS companies and product-led growth strategies. Appcues&apos; market position comes down to its mid-market focus and no-code approach to user onboarding.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/apple-pay-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Apple Pay? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries deploy Apple Pay most? The United States leads at 49.1% — the highest US concentration of the six payment profiles — followed by the United Kingdom at 14.0%, Australia at 8.6%, Canada at 7.9% and Germany at 4.6%, across 292,833 enriched companies. Germany sits notably low here against 12.2% on the PayPal profile, which is a real difference in how those two payment methods are used in that market rather than an artifact.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/apple-pay-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Apple Pay the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 17.74%, with Retail Apparel &amp; Fashion at 10.8% — the highest apparel share of the six — Food &amp; Beverage at 4.01%, Manufacturing at 3.95% and Retail Luxury Goods &amp; Jewelry at 3.06%. The apparel and luxury skew is consistent with a wallet whose advantage is mobile checkout completion on high-consideration purchases.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/apple-pay-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Apple Pay Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>77.32% of companies with Apple Pay have 1-10 employees and 17.09% have 11-50. Only 0.04% exceed 5,000 employees. The curve reflects Shopify&apos;s merchant base, where enabling Apple Pay is a toggle rather than an integration project.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/apple-pay-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Apple Pay Market Share Among Payment Processing</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Apple Pay&apos;s market share? Apple Pay holds 15.46% of the Payment Processing category with 1,273,419 domains, ranking 2nd behind PayPal. Because its rule includes genuine integration signals as well as the Shopify footer icon, this figure is a better proxy for real deployment than the card-brand entries below it — though it still counts storefronts, not payments. Its top seven entries — PayPal, Apple Pay, Shop Pay, Visa, Mastercard, American Express and Google Pay — account for 89.09% of all 8.24 million domains in Payment Processing, largely the same Shopify storefronts counted seven times. Stripe ranks 8th at 2.62%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/asgaros-forum-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Asgaros Forum? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Asgaros Forum the most? The United States leads with 277 companies, 24.9% of the enriched base — a low share by our standards, and a sign of genuinely distributed adoption. Germany (138) is a strong second, followed by France (115), the United Kingdom (86), Spain (44), Canada (30), the Netherlands (28), Poland (25) and Italy (25). Asgaros is developed in Germany, and the European weighting reflects both that origin and the WordPress plugin directory&apos;s role in distributing free software without any sales motion.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/asgaros-forum-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Asgaros Forum the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Asgaros has the most distinctive industry profile in the forum category, and it is not a technology one. Non-profit Organizations lead at 6.2% and Civic and Social Organizations follow at 5.35% — together 11.55%, and the only case in this refresh where community and voluntary organisations top a table. Professional Training and Coaching (4.06%), Wellness and Fitness Services (3.42%), Business Consulting (3.21%), IT Services (3.1%), Spectator Sports (2.99%) and Higher Education (2.35%) follow. These are membership organisations — clubs, associations, charities, course communities — where a discussion board serves members rather than customers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/asgaros-forum-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Asgaros Forum Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Asgaros Forum? 70.68% of matched companies have 1-10 employees and 16.27% have 11-50, so 86.9% sit under 50 people, based on 1,114 enriched companies. This is the most concentrated small-business distribution in the forum category. A free plugin that adds a discussion board to an existing WordPress site is aimed squarely at organisations that want community features without a second platform to run, and the size profile shows exactly that.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/asgaros-forum-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Asgaros Forum Market Share Among Community &amp; Comments</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Asgaros Forum&apos;s market share? Asgaros holds 0.73% of the Community &amp; Comments category on 2,068 domains, ranking #9 of 63. Livefyre (227,094 domains, 80.11%) nominally leads the category, but Adobe discontinued the service in 2017 — those detections are abandoned script tags rather than a competing product. The comparison that matters is not against standalone forum software but against other WordPress forum plugins, chiefly bbPress. Asgaros positions on being lightweight and genuinely free — no premium tier gating basic features — and it is the only forum product in this refresh whose entire footprint sits inside WordPress. Against standalone platforms like Discourse (3,760) or XenForo (7,881) it is not really competing: those replace your site&apos;s architecture, Asgaros adds a page to it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/asia-top-networks-traffic-share-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Asia&apos;s Top Networks Q1 2026: Mobile Operators Dwarf AWS by 4.3x</image:title>
      <image:caption>Asian internet traffic is dominated by mobile operators, not cloud providers. Reliance Jio (AS55836) alone carries 5.76% of Asian traffic — 4.3 times more than AWS at 1.33%. Viettel, Bharti Airtel, VNPT, and China Telecom all outrank every hyperscaler. India&apos;s telecom regulator data shows Jio holds a 49.07% domestic market share with 519.64 million subscribers as of March 2026.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/asp-net-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use ASP.NET? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use ASP.NET the most? The United States leads with 169,608 matched domains, ahead of India (38,598) and the United Kingdom (35,512). Then the list stops looking like a typical enterprise-software ranking: Italy (21,220) and Turkey (18,072) both place above Germany (9,014) and France (4,852), and China (12,922) sits in the top eight. Brazil (16,950), Canada (13,239), Spain (10,393), Australia (9,564) and the Netherlands (9,166) fill in around them. That pattern tends to follow local hosting markets that standardised on Windows years ago rather than current buying decisions, which fits a stack whose installed base is largely inherited. These are counts inside the 485,963 domains we could match to a company record, not the full detected base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/asp-net-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use ASP.NET the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>The striking thing here is how flat the distribution is. IT Services and IT Consulting leads at just 4.65%, followed by Retail (4.14%), Software Development (3.94%), Real Estate (3.59%) and Construction (3.08%). Advertising Services (2.65%), Financial Services (2.40%), Technology and Internet (2.27%), Business Consulting (2.14%) and Individual and Family Services (1.94%) complete the top ten, which together account for roughly 31% of matched domains. For comparison, the top ten industries cover about 50% of Framer&apos;s base and 41% of the LinkedIn Insight Tag&apos;s. Nothing here is a vertical play. A general-purpose server stack that has been shipping for over twenty years ends up everywhere in roughly equal measure, and that is what the data shows.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/asp-net-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ASP.NET Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>ASP.NET has an enterprise reputation and a small-business footprint. 58.49% of the domains we profile belong to companies with 1-10 employees, and the 11-50 band takes it to 81.56%. Only 2,169 domains sit at companies of 10,001+ employees, with 1,737 more at 5,001-10,000 and 7,699 at 1,001-5,000: real in absolute terms, negligible as a share. Read that alongside what the detection covers. The same signals identify Classic ASP and Web Forms, so a large part of this base is small, long-lived sites that were built on a Microsoft stack once and never moved, rather than enterprises actively choosing .NET today. Percentages are of the 441,438 domains with an employee band on record.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/asp-net-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ASP.NET Market Share Among Web Frameworks</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is ASP.NET&apos;s market share? ASP.NET holds a 46.19% share of the web frameworks category, ranking #1, ahead of Ruby on Rails (10.96%) and Nuxt.js (10.25%). That is a share of the domains we detect running a framework in this category, not a share of all websites and not a share of spending. Some of the gap is also detection surface. ASP.NET is matched on four kinds of signal, cookies, a DOM element, response headers and a URL pattern, while Express, fourth in the category, is matched on a single response header. A platform that announces itself in more places is easier to count.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/astro-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Astro? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Astro the most? The United States leads with 25,444 companies, then India (6,902), the United Kingdom (6,852), Brazil (6,591) and Germany (6,175). France (4,430), Spain (3,205), Canada (3,062) and Australia (2,658) follow. The spread is unusually flat for a web framework: no single country dominates the way the United States does in most tools we track, and Latin America is well represented, with Brazil, Mexico (1,993), Colombia (1,279) and Argentina (1,019) all inside the top fifteen. Read this table as where the companies behind Astro domains are registered rather than where the code is written.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/astro-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Astro the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 7.86%, followed by Software Development (7.04%), Business Consulting and Services (5.22%) and Technology, Information and Internet (4.82%). Those four are all tech-adjacent and combine for 24.94% of the enriched base. The remainder is broader than the framework&apos;s reputation suggests: Advertising Services (3.34%), Construction (2.99%), Retail (2.25%), Marketing Services (2.24%) and Financial Services (2.15%) all carry meaningful volume, which is what you would expect from a base dominated by small sites built by agencies rather than by in-house engineering teams.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/astro-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Astro Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Astro only for small companies? 74.43% of the companies we can size have 1 to 10 employees, 75,358 out of 101,251, with another 18.16% in the 11 to 50 band. That is the most small-business-weighted distribution in this category. At the other end the enterprise tail is narrow but real: 148 companies with 10,001 or more employees and 425 in the 1,001 to 5,000 band. Both halves are true at once. Our crawl places Astro on domains owned by Unilever, IKEA, Adobe, BlackRock and LEGO, and it also places it on tens of thousands of one-person sites. Enterprise deployments here are usually a single property, a docs portal or a microsite rather than a company-wide standard.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/astro-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Astro Market Share Among Static Site Generators</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Astro&apos;s market share? Astro holds 26.13% of the static site generator category, ranking #2 across 26 tracked technologies and 1,099,131 active domains. Next.js leads at 66.6% (731,970 domains), Astro follows at 287,180, then Gatsby at 2.71% (29,767), Hugo at 2.61% (28,690) and Jekyll at 0.69% (7,537). One caution before comparing rows directly: the tools in this category leave different amounts of evidence in a page, so part of the distance between the top of this table and the bottom is how detectable each tool is rather than how widely each is used. Treat every count here as a floor.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/atlassian-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Atlassian? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Atlassian the most? The United States leads on 38,538 companies, 40.68% of the 94,740 held by the fifteen countries shown. Germany is second on 10,781 and the United Kingdom third on 9,667, then Australia fourth on 6,345, ahead of Canada on 4,589. Australia sitting above Canada is a home-market signal that very few vendor profiles on TechnologyChecker.io produce, and it is the sort of detail a verification record records well, because it is set at the corporate apex by the company itself. The European rows are heavy: the Netherlands 4,337, France 3,379, Switzerland 3,064, Spain 2,385, Sweden 1,792, Belgium 1,652, Poland 1,594 and Italy 1,531, with Switzerland ahead of India&apos;s 2,745 despite a population difference of two orders of magnitude. That is what a base of engineering-led organisations looks like. Two caveats: country is the headquarters on the enriched company record, not where anyone opens Jira, and a group that verifies one apex appears once rather than once per subsidiary.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/atlassian-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Atlassian the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use Atlassian? Technology, decisively. IT Services and IT Consulting leads on 16,441 companies, 13.90% of the roughly 118,300 with a recorded industry, with Software Development almost level on 16,133 (13.63%). Our industry taxonomy carries a second, older IT label as well, so the honest way to total the cluster is to add Technology, Information and Internet on 5,817 (4.92%) and Information Technology &amp; Services on 3,783 (3.20%), giving 42,174 companies, 35.65%, in technology. Financial Services follows on 6,895 (5.83%), then Advertising Services 3,046 (2.57%), Hospitals and Health Care 2,644 (2.23%), Insurance 2,230 (1.88%), Business Consulting and Services 2,141 (1.81%) and Retail 1,855 (1.57%). A tool bought by software teams shows up as a list of software companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/atlassian-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Atlassian Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Atlassian? Mid-market, and more evenly spread than the named table suggests. The largest band is 11-50 employees on 34,965 of the 120,618 companies with a size band, 28.99%, then 51-200 on 29,985 (24.86%) and 1-10 on 23,794 (19.73%). Add those three and 88,744 companies, 73.57%, employ fewer than 200 people. Above them sit 12,867 at 201-500 (10.67%), 6,755 at 501-1,000 (5.60%), 8,130 at 1,001-5,000 (6.74%), 1,720 at 5,001-10,000 (1.43%) and 2,402 at 10,001+ (1.99%), so 12,252 companies, 10.16%, employ more than a thousand. Now set that against the named list further down, where 49 of the 50 rows are in the largest band. That list is ordered by prominence, so it shows the top of the base rather than its centre. The centre is a company of twenty to a hundred people that signed up, verified its domain so that accounts could be provisioned against company email, and has left the record in place ever since. Both facts are true at once: nearly every very large enterprise you can name is here, and three quarters of this list is under 200 people.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/atlassian-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Atlassian Market Share Among Productivity &amp; Collaboration</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Atlassian&apos;s market share? Atlassian ranks 1st of our Productivity &amp; Collaboration category on 35.41% share, from 140,482 domains. That is the position, and it needs one qualification to be quoted safely: it is a lead in domains carrying an Atlassian verification record, which is not the same claim as a lead in usage. A record published once in DNS accumulates and does not expire; whether the software behind it is in daily use, or was retired three years ago, is invisible to this rule. The rows below it are Zoom on 46,664 domains (11.76%), DocuSign on 39,558 (9.97%), Kakao on 36,581 (9.22%), Webex on 27,560 (6.95%) and Slack on 20,844 (5.25%). Atlassian&apos;s count is 3.01 times Zoom&apos;s, and all five together reach 43.15% against Atlassian&apos;s 35.41%. One further disclosure belongs here: a second row in our detection dictionary, Statuspage, carries a byte-identical rule, the same atlassian-domain-verification string. Statuspage is filed under Help Desk rather than this category, so it does not double-count inside the 35.41%, but the same domains are counted under two names elsewhere in the corpus.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/audioeye-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use AudioEye? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use AudioEye the most? 95.84% of enriched AudioEye companies with a country on file are in the United States, with Canada second at 2.05%, Italy at 0.75% and the United Kingdom at 0.43%. No other vendor in this category is that concentrated. Accessibility buying in the US is driven by ADA demand letters, and AudioEye sells against that risk, so its footprint tracks a legal market rather than a technical one.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/audioeye-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use AudioEye the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail is the largest vertical at 16.47% of the ten industries we chart, with Construction at 15.98%, Individual and Family Services at 14.82% and Real Estate at 12.59% behind it. Those shares are of the top ten only, not of the whole customer base, so read them as a ranking. Nothing runs away with it, which fits a product sold on legal risk rather than on any single industry workflow.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/audioeye-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AudioEye Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is AudioEye built for small businesses? Overwhelmingly, yes. 57.38% of enriched AudioEye companies have ten employees or fewer and another 29.02% fall in the 11 to 50 band, so 86.4% of the base sits under fifty people, based on the companies with a known headcount. Sort our detections by staff count, though, and the top of the list is Samsung, Weatherford and a run of US hospital systems and school districts.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/audioeye-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AudioEye Market Share Among Accessibility Tools</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is AudioEye&apos;s market share? AudioEye holds 14.58% of the Accessibility Tools category and ranks #3 of the 47 technologies we track there, behind UserWay (35.57%) and accessiBe (21.9%). The category is top-heavy: those two plus AudioEye and Pojo.me account for most of the 430,588 domains we see across all 47 vendors, based on our monthly crawl at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/audioeye-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AudioEye Usage Statistics 2013-2026: 64,975 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>AudioEye enters our long-run detection history in December 2013 on a single domain, reaches 148 by January 2018, 6,291 by January 2021 and 23,298 by January 2024. Our current crawl then measured 57,070 domains in June 2026, 64,454 in July and 64,975 in August. Read the chart with one caution: our coverage changed between July 2025 and June 2026, so the step across that gap is our coverage widening rather than customers arriving.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/auth0-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Auth0? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Auth0 the most? The United States dominates with 50.3% of all customers, followed by the United Kingdom (8.0%) and Canada (3.7%). Auth0&apos;s global footprint extends across 70+ countries, but the concentration is clear: English-speaking markets (US, UK, Canada, Australia) account for over 65% of the user base, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/auth0-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Auth0 the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development is the dominant industry at 23.28%, followed by Technology, Information and Internet (9.37%) and Financial Services (7.83%). The tech-heavy skew makes sense for a developer-first platform. Still, no single industry exceeds 23%, which means Auth0 serves a genuinely horizontal market, from healthcare and insurance to real estate and nonprofits.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/auth0-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Auth0 Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Auth0 only for startups? Not at all, but small teams are the foundation. 37.71% of Auth0 customers have 1-10 employees based on our analysis of 3,632 enriched companies. Combined with the 11-50 range, small businesses make up nearly 66% of the base. That said, 3% are enterprises with 10,001+ employees, and these include Fortune 500 names like Siemens, Pfizer, and P&amp;G.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/auth0-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Auth0 Market Share Among Identity &amp; Access (SSO/CIAM)</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Auth0&apos;s market share? Auth0 holds 0.49% of the Identity &amp; Access (SSO/CIAM) category with 4,812 domains, ranking 10th of 54. The percentage is diluted by what sits above it: Facebook Login (63.43%) and Google Sign-in (22.36%) are social login buttons, and together with Duo Security, LinkedIn Sign-in, 1Password, NextAuth.js and Apple Sign-in they occupy the seven rows ahead of Auth0 and Clerk. Among the commercial identity platforms an enterprise would run a procurement process for, Auth0 is second behind Clerk on domain count and comfortably first on customer size.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/authorize-net-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use authorize.net? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 4,648 matched companies, 87.42% of the geographic base. Canada follows a long way back on 216 (4.06%), then the United Kingdom on 76 and Australia on 67. No other market reaches 1%. This is the most US-concentrated payment technology in our corpus, and any read of its numbers as global adoption will be wrong.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/authorize-net-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use authorize.net the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Veterinary Services leads at 11.05% once the two labels for the same sector are combined, followed by Retail (8.33%), Research Services (3.80%) and Wholesale (2.93%). Manufacturing adds 2.23% and Hospitals and Health Care 1.99%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/authorize-net-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>authorize.net Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>52.99% of matched authorize.net companies employ 1 to 10 people and 32.12% employ 11 to 50. The tail is more substantial than the headline suggests: 74 companies exceed 1,000 employees and 20 exceed 10,000, which is where the recognisable names on this page come from.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/authorize-net-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>authorize.net Market Share Among Payment Processing</image:title>
      <image:caption>authorize.net holds 0.10% of Payment Processing and ranks 18th of 50. That ranking places it below card marks and wallet buttons that co-occur on a single checkout rather than compete with it. Restricted to US-based companies it is 15th overall and third among gateways, on 4,649 companies against Square&apos;s 4,760 and Stripe&apos;s 56,626.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/autonomous-sensor-market-growth-2021-2031.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Autonomous &amp; Sensor Tech Growth 2021-2031: 30.92% in 2024, 5.43% by 2031</image:title>
      <image:caption>The global autonomous and sensor technology market grew 30.92% year-over-year in 2024 and is forecast to slow to just 5.43% by 2031, according to Statista Market Insights. After a 99.94% surge in 2021 driven by early autonomous-vehicle capex and a 45.31% contraction in 2022 during the AV market reset, the segment is decelerating faster than any other AI category — ending the forecast period at near-mature single-digit growth. The 25.49-percentage-point deceleration over 2024-2031 is the steepest of any AI segment.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/autonomous-sensor-market-revenue-2020-2031.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Autonomous &amp; Sensor AI Market 2020-2031: $26.46B to $68.75B</image:title>
      <image:caption>The global autonomous and sensor technology market reached $26.46 billion in 2024 and is forecast to grow to $68.75 billion by 2031, according to Statista Market Insights — adding $42.29 billion over seven years. This is the slowest-growing major AI segment in percentage terms: Statista forecasts a 25.49-percentage-point decline in annual growth rates between 2024 (30.92%) and 2031 (5.43%) as the segment matures earlier than other AI categories. Despite the rapid deceleration, the autonomous and sensor tech market still grows 160% across the forecast window.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/aws-annual-revenue-2013-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AWS Revenue 2013-2025: $3.1B to $128.7B, a 41x Increase</image:title>
      <image:caption>Amazon Web Services grew from $3.11 billion in annual revenue in 2013 to $128.73 billion in 2025, a 41.4x increase. Growth slowed sharply to 13.3% in 2023 before recovering to 18.5% in 2024 and 19.7% in 2025. The $21.17 billion AWS added in 2025 is the largest single-year increase in the segment&apos;s history.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/aws-hyperscaler-share-2020-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AWS Has Given Up 7 Points of Hyperscaler Share Since 2020</image:title>
      <image:caption>Measured across the four hyperscale vendors, AWS held 51.3 percent of combined IaaS and PaaS spending in 2024, down from 58.3 percent in 2020 and falling in every year of the period. Microsoft Azure absorbed 8.5 points of that shift, more than AWS actually lost, with the remainder coming out of Alibaba Cloud. Google Cloud Platform gained 2.5 points to reach 9.8 percent.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/aws-iaas-market-share-2015-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AWS IaaS Market Share Fell From 51.8% in 2017 to 37.7% in 2024</image:title>
      <image:caption>Amazon&apos;s share of the worldwide public cloud IaaS market peaked at 51.8% in 2017 and fell to 37.7% by 2024, a loss of 14.1 percentage points. Over the same period Microsoft rose from 13.3% to 23.9% and Google from 3.3% to 9.0%. The share did not move only between the top three: all other vendors collapsed from 48.4% in 2015 to 17.9% in 2024, so the market consolidated first and redistributed second.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/aws-market-share-by-denominator-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AWS Market Share Is 28% or 55.6% Depending on the Denominator</image:title>
      <image:caption>Credible measurements of AWS&apos;s market share range from 28% to 55.55% for essentially the same period. None is wrong; each measures a different market. Synergy and Canalys measure all cloud infrastructure spend, Gartner measures public cloud IaaS only, Wikibon counts only the four hyperscalers, Cloudflare Radar measures origin traffic rather than spending, and TechnologyChecker.io measures detected domains in the PaaS category. Quoting any one figure without naming its denominator hides a definitional disagreement rather than resolving it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/aws-origin-request-share-by-region-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>43.7% of AWS Origin Traffic Goes to One Region: us-east-1</image:title>
      <image:caption>Of all requests Cloudflare&apos;s network sent to AWS origins between 2 and 30 August 2026, 43.69% went to a single region, us-east-1 in Northern Virginia. The three largest US regions together take 67.4%. This is the concentration that turns an AWS regional incident into an internet-wide one.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/aws-region-request-share-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AWS Region Request Share Q1 2026: us-east-1 Handles 41.5% of Traffic</image:title>
      <image:caption>A single AWS region — us-east-1 in Northern Virginia — handles 41.5% of all AWS requests globally. The top three US regions (Virginia, Ohio, Oregon) account for 66.8%. Europe&apos;s Frankfurt and Ireland regions together contribute 13.7%, while Asia-Pacific hubs in Singapore, Tokyo, and Mumbai combine for 9.4%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/azure-front-door-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Azure Front Door? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Azure Front Door the most? The United States leads with 9,788 of the 24,109 companies we could locate, 40.6%, and the United Kingdom is second on 2,998, 12.44%. Canada (1,210) and Australia (1,106) follow, so four English-speaking countries hold 15,102 companies, 62.64% of the located base. The rows worth stopping on sit lower: Denmark (340), Sweden (331) and Norway (321) each place above Spain (282), India (281) and Italy (269), and the three Nordic countries together hold 992 companies, just short of Germany&apos;s 1,002 on its own, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/azure-front-door-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Azure Front Door the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads the Azure Front Door industry mix at 5.37%, with Financial Services a twentieth of a point behind at 5.32%. Nothing reaches 6%, and the twelve labels shown come to 40.17% of the 21,471 companies with a recorded industry, so this is a flat distribution rather than a vertical one. The composition is the tell. Financial Services, Insurance, Hospitals and Health Care and Government Administration together are 13.73%, while our Microsoft Azure platform profile is led by IT Services and Software Development, which rank third and fourth here.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/azure-front-door-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Azure Front Door Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Azure Front Door? Both ends of the range at once, which is unusual. 36.95% of the 22,558 matched companies that report a headcount employ ten people or fewer and 60.18% employ 50 or fewer, the ordinary shape for anything bought on a card. The top of the range is not ordinary: 2,395 companies, 10.62%, employ more than 1,000, and 566 of them employ more than 10,000. That enterprise band is heavier here than on our Microsoft Azure platform profile, where it is 7.49%, which is the first sign that these two pages are not describing the same buyers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/azure-front-door-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Azure Front Door Market Share Among Load Balancers &amp; Proxies</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Azure Front Door&apos;s market share? Azure Front Door holds 15.75% of Load Balancers &amp; Proxies and ranks 4th of the 12 technologies in that category, on 48,175 domains. Envoy leads on 36.39%, but Envoy is an open-source proxy teams run themselves rather than a service anyone buys, so reading it as the market leader answers a different question. Among the products that are sold, Amazon ALB (22.81%), Google Cloud Load Balancing (16.61%) and Azure Front Door (15.75%) hold 55.17% of the category between them, and the last two are 0.86 points apart, the closest pair in the table, based on our monthly crawl at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/azure-monitor-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Azure Monitor? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Azure Monitor the most? The United States leads with 8,952 of the 17,668 companies we placed in a country (50.67%), followed by the United Kingdom (2,006, 11.35%) and Australia (889, 5.03%). Northern Europe is the surprise. The Netherlands (728), Norway (643), Sweden (618) and Denmark (423) contribute 2,412 between them, well past Canada, Germany and France combined, which is unusual for a US cloud product and fits the public health and industrial names in the list, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/azure-monitor-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Azure Monitor the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Government Administration shows as the top industry at 14.11%, and one platform explains most of it. 1,585 of those 2,229 government domains belong to the CivicPlus fleet, a US municipal website product whose telemetry the SDK is, so city halls, libraries and police departments inherit it rather than choose it. Strip the fleet out and government falls to 4.84%, barely ahead of Financial Services at 4.18%, which is the honest read of the industry mix at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/azure-monitor-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Azure Monitor Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Azure Monitor only for enterprises? No. 35.79% of the 16,798 sized companies employ ten people or fewer, and much of that is small municipal bodies that inherited the SDK from their website platform rather than buying it. Real enterprise use is still heavy: 1,706 companies (10.16%) employ more than 1,000 people, among them Ericsson, McKesson and Qatar Airways, from our analysis of 18,057 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/azure-monitor-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Azure Monitor Market Share Among APM &amp; Error Tracking</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Azure Monitor&apos;s market share? Azure Monitor holds a 1.23% share of the APM &amp; Error Tracking market and ranks 8th of 58 tracked technologies, based on our monthly crawl of roughly 29.9 million live domains. Read the rank with the detection rule in mind: we see the Application Insights browser SDK, so this share measures web-page telemetry, not Azure Monitor&apos;s server or container coverage. Sentry takes 71.7% of the category because error tracking sits in almost every JavaScript app. Against the other monitoring suites, New Relic (8.51%) and Datadog (6.1%), Azure Monitor has the smaller web footprint.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/b2b-influencer-selection-criteria-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>How B2B Marketers Pick Creators 2025: Authenticity Tops at 58%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Among senior B2B marketers worldwide in 2025, 58 percent named authenticity and credibility as the leading criterion for selecting creators, well ahead of industry relevance (49 percent), brand alignment (47 percent), and subject-matter expertise (47 percent). The result inverts the B2C playbook, where TikTok partner choices still hinge mainly on follower count.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/b2c-b2b-social-platforms-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>B2C vs B2B Platform Priorities 2026: Facebook Leads B2C, LinkedIn B2B</image:title>
      <image:caption>During a 2026 global survey, approximately 46 percent of responding business-to-consumer (B2C) marketers said Facebook was the most important social media platform. Among business-to-business (B2B) professionals, LinkedIn ranked first, selected by 51 percent. The split shows how audience type reshapes platform strategy: LinkedIn jumps from 10% among B2C marketers to 51% among B2B marketers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/backbone-js-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Backbone.js? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>United States leads global adoption of Backbone.js with 44,659 active deployments. The country distribution highlights where Backbone.js sees strongest market traction.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/backbone-js-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Backbone.js the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Construction is the industry with the highest share of Backbone.js adoption, at 3.4% of all customers. The distribution reflects which sectors find Backbone.js most useful.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/backbone-js-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Backbone.js Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>65.5% of Backbone.js customers are companies with 1-10 employees. This distribution reveals which company segments rely on Backbone.js most.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/backbone-js-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Backbone.js Market Share Among JavaScript Frameworks</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Backbone.js&apos;s market share? Backbone.js holds a 3.1% share of the JavaScript frameworks market on 213,368 active domains, ranking #8 in the category, based on our monthly crawl of 29.9M live domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. It sits behind React (42.4%), Vue (12.59%), AMP (9%), React Router (5.7%), Zone.js (4.73%), Mustache (4.08%) and Alpine.js (3.99%). Despite its legacy status the framework holds a stable base across enterprise applications.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/barriers-ai-tool-adoption-marketers-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Barriers to Marketer AI Adoption 2025: Data Privacy Tops at 41%</image:title>
      <image:caption>A 2025 survey of marketers in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America found data privacy concerns ranked first as a barrier to adopting new AI tools, chosen by 41 percent. Training and time investment followed at 39 percent, with tool sprawl and integration challenges tied at 34 percent. Only 11 percent reported no barriers to AI tool adoption in the past year.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bbpress-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use bbPress? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use bbPress the most? The United States leads with 33.4% of all customers, but bbPress&apos;s footprint reaches 120+ countries. The United Kingdom (8.8%) and France (5.9%) round out the top three. English-speaking countries together account for over 42% of the user base, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bbpress-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use bbPress the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use bbPress the most? Higher Education is the top industry at 21.72%, followed by Technology, Information and Internet (11.29%). The long tail is significant, no single industry exceeds 22%, so bbPress reads as a horizontal platform with strong pull in education and nonprofits, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bbpress-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>bbPress Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use bbPress? Is bbPress only for small organizations? No, but small shops are its core audience. 48.3% of bbPress customers have 1-10 employees based on our analysis of 48,515 enriched companies, which makes the plugin the default pick for micro-businesses and startups. Enterprise users like Michelin, Mayo Clinic, and Purdue University show bbPress also runs at institutional scale.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bbpress-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>bbPress Market Share Among Community &amp; Comments</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is bbPress&apos;s market share? bbPress holds a 34.72% share of the Forum &amp; Community market and ranks #1 in the category, roughly 3.2x its closest competitor Ultimate Member (10.73%). The figure is based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bdow-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use BDOW? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 3,216 of the companies we can place, then the United Kingdom (405), Australia (344), Canada (307) and France (304). The gap between the US and everywhere else is eight to one, wider than most of this category, which fits a product whose growth years were driven by English-language content marketing.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bdow-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use BDOW the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Advertising Services leads at 5.69%, then Business Consulting and Services at 3.56% and Professional Training and Coaching at 3.38%. Agencies, consultants and course sellers — the people who build an email list as the business model rather than as a channel.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bdow-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>BDOW Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>72.35% of the companies we can size have 10 employees or fewer and 19.3% have 11 to 50. Small publishers, consultancies and agencies — the audience that adopted Sumo when list-building was the dominant content-marketing tactic.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bdow-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>BDOW Market Share Among Popups &amp; Lead Capture</image:title>
      <image:caption>BDOW is tenth of the 64 technologies in Popups &amp; Lead Capture at 3.2% of 427,401 domains. Read that against what Sumo was: in the mid-2010s it was one of the most widely installed email-capture tools on the web. What remains is a tenth-place footprint that is not being replenished.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/big-three-north-america-traffic-share-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Big Three Traffic Share in North America Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025</image:title>
      <image:caption>Nearly 1 in 6 bytes in North America flows through a hyperscaler. AWS leads at 7.67%, Google Cloud at 4.88%, and Microsoft Azure at 4.14%. Azure grew 40% year over year while AWS (-12.6%) and Google (-15.5%) lost relative share as consumer streaming and social traffic grew faster than enterprise cloud.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bigcommerce-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use BigCommerce? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use BigCommerce the most? The United States dominates with 74.6% of companies whose country we know, followed by the United Kingdom at 8.0%, Australia at 6.8% and Canada at 4.3%. English-speaking markets account for 95.0% of the base and Europe for only 11.2%. That is the most concentrated geographic profile of any platform in this category by a wide margin. BigCommerce is, in our data, an American platform with an Australian and British minority and essentially no continental European presence.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bigcommerce-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use BigCommerce the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 19.86%, the second-highest retail concentration in this category after PrestaShop, followed by Wholesale (4.77%), Manufacturing (4.72%) and Retail Apparel and Fashion (3.42%). The wholesale-plus-manufacturing combination at nearly 9.5% is distinctive and points at BigCommerce&apos;s B2B positioning: businesses selling to trade as well as consumers, with catalogue and pricing requirements that a pure DTC platform handles less comfortably.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bigcommerce-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>BigCommerce Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use BigCommerce? 61.19% have 1-10 employees and another 28.02% have 11-50, putting 89.21% under fifty people. The age distribution skews older than the hosted-platform norm: 24.85% were founded in the 2000s and 14.64% in the 1990s, so a meaningful slice of this base is established businesses that moved online rather than digital natives. That fits the industry data below, which is heavy on wholesale and manufacturing.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bigcommerce-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>BigCommerce Market Share Among Ecommerce Platforms</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is BigCommerce&apos;s market share? BigCommerce holds a 0.22% share of the Ecommerce Platforms market, ranking #30. A niche player in a category dominated by Shopify at 46.9%, based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. Shopify&apos;s domain count is 210x larger than BigCommerce&apos;s 11,665.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bitrix24-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Bitrix24? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Bitrix24 the most? Russia leads at 36.1%, followed by Brazil (14.4%) and the United States (5.9%). This distribution is unusual for the CRM category, where most platforms skew 40%+ US. Bitrix24 is the rare CRM with a strong post-Soviet footprint (Russia plus Belarus, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan account for about 45% of enriched customers) and a second engine in Latin America. Bitrix24 also publishes its interface in 16 languages, including German, Spanish, Chinese, French, and Vietnamese, which matches the geographic pattern we see in our enriched data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bitrix24-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Bitrix24 the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 8.10%, followed by Business Consulting (4.17%) and Technology, Information and Internet (3.70%). Roll up all tech-adjacent verticals (IT Services, Software Development, Advertising Services, Information Technology &amp; Services) and Bitrix24&apos;s customer base is roughly 24% tech-and-agency driven. No single non-tech industry exceeds 3%. That horizontal mix matches Bitrix24&apos;s own self-reporting: the company says 61.1% of its users are service-based businesses, broader than any single vertical tag captures.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bitrix24-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Bitrix24 Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Bitrix24 only for small businesses? Largely yes. With 51.4% of Bitrix24 customers having 1-10 employees and another 21.3% in the 11-50 band, the platform is built around freelancers, micro-agencies, and small teams. A likely reason: Bitrix24 advertises itself as the only major CRM without per-user pricing, which removes the usual per-seat tax that hurts small teams. Only 5.4% of the enriched base exceeds 1,000 employees, though Fortune 500 names like Gazprom Neft, MTS Group, and Kaspersky Lab appear in the data when department-level deployments call for it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bitrix24-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Bitrix24 Market Share Among CRM</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Bitrix24&apos;s market share? Bitrix24 holds 2.33% of the CRM category on 15,719 domains, ranking #4. Read it regionally: within Russia and the CIS Bitrix24 is a default business suite rather than one CRM option among many, and our LinkedIn-based enrichment cannot see that market properly.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bluehost-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Bluehost? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Bluehost is the most American technology in this group. The United States accounts for 67.12% of matched companies, with Canada at 5.95% and the United Kingdom at 4.26%. Shared hosting is bought close to home, and Bluehost sells into the US small-business market above all others.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bluehost-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Bluehost the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>No industry reaches 5%. Construction leads at 4.35%, followed by Business Consulting and Services at 4.08%, Advertising Services at 3.56%, IT Services and IT Consulting at 3.11% and Real Estate at 2.86%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bluehost-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Bluehost Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>This is a small-business product and the distribution says so plainly. 72.71% of matched companies employ 1-10 people and 20.01% employ 11-50. Only 2.34% employ more than 200, against 5.15% for React Router and 13.97% for Angular in the same crawl. The handful of larger organisations that appear tend to be running a single marketing or campaign site on shared hosting rather than their main estate.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bluehost-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Bluehost Market Share Among Web Hosting</image:title>
      <image:caption>Bluehost holds 3.6% of Web Hosting at rank 5. The category is extremely top-heavy: GoDaddy alone takes 45.04%, more than twelve times Bluehost&apos;s share, and the top three take 63.86% between them. For scale against a provider we profiled the same day, Bluehost is 2.84 times the size of SiteGround (123,341 domains), which we detect by the same nameserver method, so the two counts are directly comparable.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/braintree-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Braintree? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 945 matched companies, 42.36% of the geographic base, with the United Kingdom unusually strong at 357 (16.00%). Australia follows on 107, the Netherlands on 91 and Germany on 78. Taiwan at 75 and Hong Kong at 38 give Braintree a wider international spread than the other US gateways on this site, which is consistent with its history as PayPal&apos;s cross-border merchant product.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/braintree-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Braintree the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 11.87%, followed by Wholesale (4.31%), Manufacturing (3.20%) and Software Development (2.60%). Retail Apparel and Fashion adds 2.56% and Motor Vehicle Manufacturing 2.10%. The distribution is flatter than the other payment technologies on this site, with no single sector above 12%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/braintree-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Braintree Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>46.58% of matched Braintree companies employ 1 to 10 people and 28.64% employ 11 to 50. The enterprise tail is proportionally the largest of the gateways we publish: 14.23% employ 51 to 200 and 113 companies exceed 500 staff, which is where LabCorp, Panasonic and Acer sit.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/braintree-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Braintree Market Share Among Payment Processing</image:title>
      <image:caption>Braintree holds 0.06% of Payment Processing and ranks 21st of 50. The ranking mixes gateways with card marks that co-occur on one checkout. Among gateways in the United States, Braintree is fourth on 945 companies, behind Stripe (56,626), Square (4,760) and authorize.net (4,649). It is the only gateway in that group with a substantial non-US base: the United Kingdom alone contributes 16.00% of its geolocated companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/brand-ai-advantages-consumers-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Consumer-Seen Advantages of Brand AI 2025: Faster Support at 47%</image:title>
      <image:caption>According to a January 2025 survey of consumers in Australia, Canada, the UK, and the US, 47 percent named faster customer support as a main advantage of brands using AI. Helping staff do their jobs followed at 38 percent, and more creative advertising at 35 percent. Cost savings passed on to the consumer and greater product innovation tied at 32 percent.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/brand-ai-disadvantages-consumers-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Consumer-Seen Downsides of Brand AI 2025: Lost Human Touch at 59%</image:title>
      <image:caption>According to a January 2025 survey of consumers in Australia, Canada, the UK, and the US, 59 percent saw loss of the human touch as the main disadvantage of brands using AI. Job losses and the inability to speak to a real person tied at 57 percent. Privacy or security weaknesses (43%) and the potential for misleading consumers (40.5%) followed.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/braze-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Braze? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States leads with 757 matched companies, and the striking feature is second place: Australia at 219, ahead of the United Kingdom at 99 and Germany at 85. Australia is roughly a fifth of the US figure on a population base about a thirteenth the size, which is a far stronger showing than that country makes in most categories we measure. Canada (43), New Zealand (34), Spain (31) and South Korea (25) follow. The concentration in English-speaking consumer markets fits a platform sold to retail, airline and quick-service restaurant brands.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/braze-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Braze the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 7.93%, then Technology, Information and Internet (5.88%), Financial Services (5.19%), Hospitality (5.13%), Restaurants (4.51%) and Spectator Sports (4.03%). That last entry is unusual and worth pausing on: sports teams and leagues appear here far more than in any other marketing platform we profile, because their business is re-engaging a large, emotionally invested audience on a fixed schedule, which is exactly what Braze is built for. Retail, hospitality and restaurants together account for more than 17% and describe the same pattern.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/braze-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Braze Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Braze has the most enterprise-weighted distribution in this category. Only 32.27% of matched companies have 1 to 10 employees, where the category leaders sit above 60%, and 19.80% have 51 to 200. A further 9.42% are in the 201 to 500 band and 1.59% have more than 10,000 employees. Roughly one matched company in seven has more than 500 staff. For a platform priced on monthly active users rather than seats, that is the expected shape: the buyer is a brand with a large audience, not a small team with a large headcount.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/braze-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Braze Market Share Among Marketing Automation</image:title>
      <image:caption>Braze holds 0.30% of the Marketing Automation category on web detections and ranks #31 of 415. That ranking is the least informative number on this page. The category is led by HubSpot at 583,796 domains and HighLevel at 109,442, both of which are web-first products that install a tag on every customer site. Braze sells to consumer brands whose primary channel is a mobile app, so it is being ranked on the one surface where it is least visible. Compare the customer lists rather than the shares: few of the platforms above Braze here count Burger King, Goldman Sachs or the NBA among their detected users.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/breach-cost-by-security-automation-2018-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Breach Cost by Security Automation 2018-2024: AI Saves $1.9M Per Breach</image:title>
      <image:caption>In 2024, organizations with extensive AI-driven security automation paid an average of $3.8M per data breach. Organizations with no security automation paid $5.7M — a $1.9M gap. The gap has been wider in some years ($3.8M in 2021), but the directional finding has held every year since 2018: more AI automation, lower breach cost. The 2024 number is the clearest ROI signal in the report for AI cybersecurity spending — and explains why 77 percent of organizations expect their cybersecurity budget to grow in 2025.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/brevo-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Brevo? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Brevo the most? France dominates with 21.3% of enriched customers (22,519 companies), reflecting Brevo&apos;s Parisian roots and strong GDPR positioning. The United States follows at 14.9% (15,780), Germany at 8.0% (8,417), and the United Kingdom at 7.9% (8,308). EU member states collectively account for 53.3% of all companies using Brevo, making it by far the most European-concentrated platform in our dataset. English-speaking markets reach only 27.8%, the lowest of any major sender we track. Percentages are shares of the 105,733 Brevo domains where we have a company country on file.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/brevo-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Brevo the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>IT Services and IT Consulting leads Brevo&apos;s industry distribution at 4.54%, with Retail almost level at 4.52% and Software Development at 3.81%. The extreme diversification (with no single industry exceeding 5%) reflects Brevo&apos;s horizontal positioning as a general-purpose marketing platform. Advertising Services at 3.56% and Technology, Information and Internet at 3.02% round out the top five, based on our analysis of 108,617 enriched companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/brevo-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Brevo Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Brevo only for small businesses? Its customer base skews heavily toward micro-businesses: 55.5% of Brevo customers have 1-10 employees based on our analysis of 108,617 enriched companies. Add the 11-50 employee segment and that figure reaches 83.3%. But the company list also includes AXA, Sanofi, Michelin, and the United Nations, all with 10,001+ employees. Brevo serves the long tail better than most, and its enterprise presence shouldn&apos;t be overlooked.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/brevo-live-chat-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Brevo Live Chat? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Brevo Live Chat the most? France dominates with 16,084 companies (21.3% of the enriched base), reflecting Brevo&apos;s Parisian roots and strong European positioning. The United States follows at 10,951 (14.5%), and Germany at 6,595 (8.7%). European countries collectively account for over 52% of all companies using Brevo Live Chat. Italy (4,170), Spain (2,448), and Belgium (1,277) round out a heavily EU-weighted footprint, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/brevo-live-chat-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Brevo Live Chat the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 4.38%, followed by Business Consulting (3.56%) and Advertising Services (3.39%). No single industry exceeds 5%, which makes Brevo Live Chat a horizontal tool. The top 6 industries are separated by just 1.19 percentage points, confirming that the platform serves a broad cross-section of businesses rather than any specific vertical, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/brevo-live-chat-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Brevo Live Chat Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Brevo Live Chat? Micro-businesses dominate: 75.7% of Brevo Live Chat customers have 1-10 employees, based on our analysis of 73,046 size-matched companies. Add the 11-50 range (15.9%) and 91.6% have fewer than 50 employees. That&apos;s one of the highest small-business concentrations in the Live Chat category. The enterprise tail is thin at just 0.1% with 10,001+ employees, but it includes names like Target, KPMG, and the United Nations.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/brevo-live-chat-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Brevo Live Chat Market Share Among Live Chat &amp; Messaging</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Brevo Live Chat&apos;s market share? Brevo Live Chat holds 0.26% of the live chat category on 7,621 domains, ranking #27. This profile previously reported a far larger figure, and the correction is worth stating: our dictionary tracks Brevo Live Chat and the wider Brevo platform as two separate technologies, and the earlier number belonged to the platform. What is counted here is the chat widget alone.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/brevo-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Brevo Market Share Among Email Marketing</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Brevo&apos;s market share? Brevo commands 5.81% of the Email Marketing market, ranking #6 behind MailChimp (21.24%), Klaviyo (16.78%), SendGrid (13.23%), Mailgun (11.54%), and Amazon SES (8.26%). It is the only European-headquartered platform in the top six and the only one where a majority of detected domains sit inside the EU, based on our monthly crawl of 28.2M domains and 7,900+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/buddyboss-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use BuddyBoss? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use BuddyBoss the most? The United States leads with 779 customers (34.7%) of all BuddyBoss users, based on our analysis of 2,411 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. The United Kingdom follows at 7.4%, then Germany at 4.2%. Together, English-speaking countries account for over 47% of the user base, but that also means 53% of BuddyBoss customers are outside the Anglosphere. This broader-than-average international spread likely reflects WordPress&apos;s global popularity and BuddyBoss&apos;s multilingual support.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/buddyboss-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use BuddyBoss the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use BuddyBoss the most? Professional Training and Coaching leads at 9.36%, followed by E-Learning Providers at 7.15% and Business Consulting at 5.7%, based on our analysis of 2,411 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. Here&apos;s what makes BuddyBoss unusual: no single industry exceeds 10%. The long-tail spread means adoption isn&apos;t tied to one vertical, you&apos;ll see wellness coaches, university departments, corporate L&amp;D teams, and nonprofits running it side by side.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/buddyboss-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>BuddyBoss Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is BuddyBoss only for small businesses? Almost entirely. A full 77.1% of BuddyBoss customers have just 1-10 employees, based on our analysis of 2,411 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. Add in the 11-50 bracket and you&apos;re at 91.44%. The platform is the backbone of solo coaches, course creators, and micro-consultancies. Only 0.29% of customers are enterprise-scale (10,001+ employees), though the exceptions are striking, Children&apos;s Hospital of Philadelphia and San Jose State University prove the platform can serve institutional buyers when the use case fits.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/buddyboss-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>BuddyBoss Market Share Among Forum &amp; Community</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is BuddyBoss&apos;s market share? BuddyBoss holds a 1.66% share of the Forum &amp; Community market, ranking #4 behind bbPress (34.72%), Ultimate Member (10.73%), and vBulletin (3.79%), based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. Don&apos;t let that small share fool you. BuddyBoss doesn&apos;t compete on volume, it competes on depth, targeting course creators and membership site builders who need far more than a basic forum plugin.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/buttonizer-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Buttonizer? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Buttonizer the most? The United States leads with 2,399 of the enriched companies we can place, but its lead is the narrowest in this category: India (1,639), Germany (1,153), Brazil (1,135) and the United Kingdom (945) follow closely.That spread follows the distribution channel. Buttonizer arrives through the WordPress plugin directory, which has no geographic bias, rather than through an app store attached to a US-centric commerce platform.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/buttonizer-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Buttonizer the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use Buttonizer the most? Construction leads at 5.12%, followed by IT Services and IT Consulting (3.48%), Business Consulting and Services (3.21%) and Medical Practices (3.07%).Construction at the top is worth a moment. It is not what a lead capture tool usually looks like, and it reflects what Buttonizer actually does: a floating click-to-call or WhatsApp button is most valuable to trades and clinics whose customers phone rather than fill in forms.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/buttonizer-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Buttonizer Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Buttonizer only for small businesses? Mostly. 58.7% of the 16,717 enriched companies employ 10 people or fewer and another 26.85% employ 11-50. Companies of 201 or more account for about 4.7%.This is the least extreme small-business skew of the large tools in the category, which fits a free WordPress plugin that gets installed on institutional sites as readily as on small ones.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/buttonizer-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Buttonizer Market Share Among Popups &amp; Lead Capture</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Buttonizer&apos;s market share? Buttonizer holds a 5.46% share of the popup and lead capture category and ranks #6 of the 60 tools we track, behind Popup Maker (27.32%), POWR (12.52%), Privy (8.85%), Mailmunch (8.19%) and Poptin (6.05%).Buttonizer&apos;s domain count rose from roughly 13,500 to 23,353 on this refresh. Its share moved less than that suggests, because the category denominator grew at the same time when Popup Maker entered our detection in August 2026.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/buttonizer-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Buttonizer Usage Statistics 2020-2026: 23.4K Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Buttonizer growing? Yes, steadily. Our detection history picks it up in August 2020 at 558 domains and follows it to a peak of 11,803 active domains in April 2025. The live crawl now detects 23,353, up from 20,822 when current-state measurement began in June 2026.The two segments come from different measurement systems, with a step of roughly 1.8x across the join, so the level is not directly comparable either side of it. The direction is consistent: Buttonizer has grown in every period we have measured.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/buy-me-a-coffee-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Buy me a coffee? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Among the 29% of domains that match a company record, the United States leads with 448, the United Kingdom follows at 232, then India (76), Canada (60) and Australia (51). India appearing this high is consistent with the industry mix below: this is a developer-heavy base, and developer tools distribute differently from media ones.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/buy-me-a-coffee-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Buy me a coffee the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development at 6.93%, Technology and Internet 6.42%, IT Services and IT Consulting 5.65% and Online Audio and Video Media 4.7%. This is the most technical audience in the category: developers, open-source maintainers and technical bloggers rather than the media and games mix on Patreon.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/buy-me-a-coffee-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Buy me a coffee Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>92.5% of the entities we can size have 10 employees or fewer, the highest concentration in this category. Only 6.03% have 11 to 50 and almost nothing appears above 200. As with Ko-fi, the more useful statistic is the one outside this chart: 71% of Buy Me a Coffee domains match no company record at all, because they are personal sites.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/buy-me-a-coffee-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Buy me a coffee Market Share Among Donations &amp; Fundraising</image:title>
      <image:caption>Buy Me a Coffee is fifth in Donations &amp; Fundraising at 5.16%. Two of the four entries above it are nonprofit donation software that share no audience with it. The comparisons that matter are Patreon (21,307 domains) and Ko-fi (6,393). We state the rank without a total because our category listing pages at 50 rows.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/bytedance-app-downloads-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ByteDance App Downloads 2026: TikTok Tops 7.53 Billion</image:title>
      <image:caption>As of July 2026, TikTok had amassed 7.53 billion all-time downloads, more than 2.6 times its nearest sibling, the video editor CapCut, at 2.85 billion. No other ByteDance app clears 500 million. ByteDance operates 118 apps across 74 countries.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/calendly-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Calendly? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Calendly the most? The United States leads with 45,327 matched companies, well ahead of the United Kingdom at 9,702. Germany (7,488) and France (7,307) are almost level, then Canada (5,848), India (4,920), Australia (4,529), and the Netherlands (3,949). The distribution is more English-speaking than most technologies we profile, which fits a product sold largely through self-serve signup in English, but continental Europe is substantial: Germany, France, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, and Belgium together add more than 23,000 matched companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/calendly-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Calendly the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Business Consulting and Services leads at 9.99%, followed by Professional Training and Coaching (6.82%), IT Services and IT Consulting (6.74%), Software Development (6.38%), and Advertising Services (6.14%). No industry passes 10%, so Calendly is a horizontal tool, but the centre of gravity is unmistakable. Consulting, coaching, advertising, and marketing services together account for roughly a third of matched companies, and all four share one trait: the core commercial activity is booking time with a client.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/calendly-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Calendly Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Calendly only for small businesses? Largely, yes. 79.29% of matched companies have 1 to 10 employees, and adding the 11 to 50 band takes it to 95.67%. This is a solo operator&apos;s tool first and a team tool second, which is exactly what a product sold through self-serve signup should look like. The other end of the distribution is thin but not empty: 46 matched companies have more than 10,000 employees, among them Iron Mountain, and a further 165 sit in the 1,001 to 5,000 band. Enterprises do run Calendly, they simply are not what the base is made of.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/calendly-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Calendly Market Share Among Appointment Scheduling</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Calendly&apos;s market share? Calendly holds 62.56% of the appointment scheduling category and ranks #1 of 132 technologies we track in it. That is an unusually concentrated category: the next largest, Bookly, sits at 5.59% with 14,105 domains, so Calendly is more than eleven times the size of its closest tracked rival. One caveat on the shape of that lead. Calendly is detectable both from its embedded widget and from a plain outbound booking link, while several competitors are WordPress plugins or booking systems that only reveal themselves through a widget, so part of the gap reflects how visible each product is rather than how many businesses use it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/callpage-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use CallPage? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use CallPage the most? Poland accounts for 668 of the 871 enriched companies with a country on file, or 76.7%, followed by the United States at 55 and the United Kingdom at 28. Italy, India and France follow closely behind those. It&apos;s a Polish product with a genuine if thin international tail, and it&apos;s the only vendor in our Call Tracking category with meaningful footprints in both Europe and South Asia, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/callpage-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use CallPage the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>No vertical reaches 6%, the flattest industry distribution in our Call Tracking category. IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 5.87%, followed by Real Estate (4.93%), Construction (4.69%) and Financial Services (4.46%). Add Software Development (3.29%) to the IT line and technology firms become the clear leading cluster at 9.16%. Selling software to software companies is a common pattern for a developer-friendly widget, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/callpage-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CallPage Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use CallPage? Slightly larger than the category norm. 44.57% have ten or fewer employees, which is the lowest micro-business share of any vendor here except Ringostat, while 35.18% sit in the 11 to 50 band and 13.35% in 51 to 200. That puts 79.8% under 50 people, based on our analysis of 884 companies with employee data on file. A callback widget suits a business with someone available to answer, which nudges the profile upward.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/callpage-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CallPage Market Share Among Call Tracking</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is CallPage&apos;s market share? CallPage holds a 0.76% share of the Call Tracking market and ranks #14 of the 43 platforms we track. That placement needs a caveat we&apos;d rather state than hide: CallPage discontinued its call tracking feature in 2024 and now sells a callback widget. The detections are real, the categorisation is a legacy of what the product used to include, based on our monthly crawl of 29.9M active domains at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/callpage-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CallPage Usage Statistics 2016-2026: 1,287 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>CallPage first appeared in our detection history in August 2016 and grew steadily rather than sharply: 271 domains by January 2018, 295 by 2020, 462 by 2022 and 609 by January 2024. Worth noting that this curve continued climbing through and after 2024, the year CallPage retired its call tracking feature, which supports reading these detections as the callback widget rather than the tracking product. The break in the chart, where our long-run history joins our current crawl at June 2026, reflects coverage widening rather than adoption.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/callrail-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use CallRail? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use CallRail the most? The United States accounts for 37,532 of the 42,280 enriched companies with a country on file, close to 89%, and Canada is second at 3,235. Call tracking runs on local phone number supply, so this category splits along telecom borders far more than most software does. CallRail&apos;s UK count (692) and Australian count (667) are close enough to be a tie, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/callrail-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use CallRail the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Construction is the single largest vertical at 12.31%, followed by Medical Practices (8.78%) and Law Practice (8.27%). Add the two healthcare labels together and they pass construction at 13.55%; add the two legal labels and they reach 11.48%. No vertical clears 13%, which makes CallRail a horizontal product sold into a narrow band of businesses that all share one trait: the phone is the checkout, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/callrail-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CallRail Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is CallRail only for small businesses? Mostly, yes. 49.85% of CallRail customers have ten or fewer employees and another 33.98% land in the 11 to 50 band, so 83.8% of the base sits under 50 people, based on our analysis of 41,204 companies with employee data on file. Only 1.04% exceed 1,000 staff. Sort our detections by headcount, though, and the top of that list is almost all hospital networks, which tells you the enterprise footprint here is real but concentrated in one buyer.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/callrail-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CallRail Market Share Among Call Tracking</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is CallRail&apos;s market share? CallRail holds a 39.85% share of the Call Tracking market and ranks #1 of the 43 platforms we track in the category, ahead of Invoca (14.12%) and CallTrackingMetrics (12.81%) put together. This category is unusually top-heavy. Those three vendors hold just over 80% of detected domains and the other 23 divide what&apos;s left, based on our monthly crawl of 29.9M active domains at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/callrail-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CallRail Usage Statistics 2012-2026: 67,072 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>CallRail first appeared in our detection history in April 2012 on a single domain and reached 67,072 active domains by July 2026. Growth compounded rather than spiked: 913 domains in January 2016, 5,382 by 2018, then 14,467 by 2022. One caveat on the chart. Counts either side of the 2025-to-2026 gap are not like-for-like, because the set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly discovered ones added, and our detection signals widen over time, so the step across that gap is wider crawl coverage and not a doubling of CallRail&apos;s customer base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/calltrackingmetrics-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use CallTrackingMetrics? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use CallTrackingMetrics the most? The United States accounts for 10,515 of the 12,450 enriched companies with a country on file, or 84.5%, followed by Canada at 1,035 and the United Kingdom at 656. That UK share of 5.25% is the highest of any US-headquartered vendor in our Call Tracking category; CallRail manages 1.6%. South Africa and Israel appear next, which is a longer international tail than the category norm, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/calltrackingmetrics-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use CallTrackingMetrics the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Construction leads at 13.04%, followed by Medical Practices (9.83%) and Hospitals and Health Care (6.89%). Healthcare across both labels reaches 16.72% and is the real leading vertical. The distinctive entry is further down: Mental Health Care at 4.99%, roughly triple what we see on comparable platforms, which points to a genuine niche in behavioural health practices, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/calltrackingmetrics-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CallTrackingMetrics Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is CallTrackingMetrics built for small businesses? Largely, yes. 50% of CallTrackingMetrics customers have ten or fewer employees and another 34.33% sit in the 11 to 50 band, so 84.3% of the base is under 50 people, based on our analysis of 12,089 companies with employee data on file. That distribution is nearly identical to CallRail&apos;s, which is one more sign these two products are competing for exactly the same buyer. Only 1.14% exceed 1,000 staff.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/calltrackingmetrics-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CallTrackingMetrics Market Share Among Call Tracking</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is CallTrackingMetrics&apos; market share? CallTrackingMetrics holds a 12.81% share of the Call Tracking market and ranks #3 of the 43 platforms we track, behind CallRail (39.85%) and Invoca (14.12%). Share understates its competitive relevance. It&apos;s the only vendor exchanging customers with CallRail at volume in both directions, which makes it the real substitute rather than the runner-up, based on our monthly crawl of 29.9M active domains at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/calltrackingmetrics-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CallTrackingMetrics Usage Statistics 2011-2026: 21,562 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>CallTrackingMetrics entered our detection history in October 2011, the earliest start of any vendor in this category. Growth came in two bursts with a long pause between them: 206 domains in January 2016 jumped to 2,511 by 2018, then sat almost flat through 2020 at 2,554 before resuming to 4,650 in 2022 and 6,031 in 2024. That two-year plateau is unusual for a category that grew steadily throughout. Note the gap in the chart: the series joins our long-run history through July 2025 to our current crawl from June 2026, so the step across it is coverage rather than adoption.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/campaign-monitor-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Campaign Monitor? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Campaign Monitor the most? The United Kingdom leads at 26.6%, ahead of the United States at 23.6%, and Campaign Monitor&apos;s Sydney origins produce an unusually strong Australian presence at 15.1%. It is the only platform in this category where the US is not the largest market. Together, English-speaking countries account for nearly 70% of all users, with Belgium (4.6%), Canada (4.4%), and the Netherlands (4.4%) behind them. Percentages are shares of the 4,924 Campaign Monitor domains where we have a company country on file.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/campaign-monitor-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Campaign Monitor the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Hospitality (5.71%) leads industry adoption, followed by Non-profit Organizations (4.22%) and Retail (4.22%), reflecting Campaign Monitor&apos;s appeal to venues, charities, and destination marketing. The remarkably even distribution, where no industry exceeds 6%, underscores its horizontal versatility, based on our analysis of 5,014 enriched companies. Real Estate (3.16%) and Construction (2.98%) round out the top five.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/campaign-monitor-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Campaign Monitor Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Campaign Monitor built for enterprises? It straddles two worlds. 54.9% of customers have 10 or fewer employees based on our analysis of 5,014 enriched companies, and 84.6% have fewer than 50. But 10.32% sit in the 51-200 range, roughly double what most platforms in this category show, and the largest detections are national and city governments rather than corporates. This is a platform with real institutional credibility that still serves the small end.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/campaign-monitor-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Campaign Monitor Market Share Among Email Marketing</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Campaign Monitor&apos;s market share? Campaign Monitor holds 0.26% of the Email Marketing market, ranking #19. That is well behind leaders like MailChimp (21.24%) and Klaviyo (16.78%), and the raw number understates the platform in one specific way: its base is concentrated in government, institutional, and Commonwealth organizations that a general web crawl under-represents. Figures come from our monthly crawl of 28.2M domains and 7,900+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/canva-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Canva? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Canva the most? The United States leads with 8,141 companies, 41.1% of the enriched base, followed by the United Kingdom (1,712) and — notably — Australia (1,259) in third. Canva was founded in Sydney in 2013 and remains headquartered there, and a home market of Australia&apos;s size out-ranking Germany (906), Canada (837) and France (568) is a real signature rather than a rounding artefact. The Netherlands (694), Brazil (502) and Belgium (328) follow, with New Zealand (153) also present, reinforcing the Australasian weighting.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/canva-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Canva the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Non-profit Organizations lead at 6.08%, the only technology in this refresh batch where a non-commercial sector tops the table. IT Services (4.99%) and Software Development (4.6%) follow, then Real Estate (3.74%), Business Consulting (3.67%) and Advertising Services (3.4%). Adding Primary and Secondary Education (3.12%) to the non-profit share brings the mission-driven cluster to 9.2%. Canva&apos;s free tiers for non-profits and schools are the obvious mechanism, and the detection data shows those programmes producing a real, measurable footprint rather than just goodwill.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/canva-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Canva Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Canva? This is the most evenly distributed size profile in our recent refresh work. Only 36.78% have 1-10 employees — against 60-75% for most tools we track — with 19.96% at 11-50, 17.89% at 51-200 and a substantial mid-market and enterprise tail: 9.13% at 201-500, 7.18% at 1,001-5,000 and 2.22% at 10,001+. Put differently, 25.4% of matched Canva companies have more than 200 employees, roughly five times the rate of the other tools in this batch. Based on 19,820 enriched companies, an 89.3% enrichment rate that is the highest we have measured — these are unambiguously real, registered organisations.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/canva-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Canva Market Share Among Digital Asset Management</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Canva&apos;s market share? Canva leads the Digital Asset Management category at 21.43% on 22,193 detected domains, ranking #1 of 42 tracked technologies, ahead of Box (17,783), Imagekit (14,766), Optimole (13,394), Adobe Dynamic Media Classic (10,702) and Dropbox (7,712). The category label sits awkwardly on this set: Box and Dropbox are file storage, Imagekit and Optimole are image delivery CDNs, and Canva is a design tool. They share the property of holding an organisation&apos;s visual assets and little else, so treat the ranking as a footprint comparison rather than a competitive one.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/carrd-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Carrd? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Carrd the most? The United States leads with 41.2% of companies whose country we know (979), followed by the United Kingdom at 13.5% (321), the highest UK share of any platform in this category, then Canada (7.0%), Australia (4.0%), Germany (3.9%) and the Netherlands (2.9%). English-speaking countries collectively account for 65.7% of the customer base and Europe for 34.0%. Carrd&apos;s reach is genuinely global for a solo-developer product, appearing in 93 countries.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/carrd-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Carrd the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Business Consulting and Services leads at 11.34% of the enriched customer base, the second-highest single-industry concentration in this category after Duda&apos;s construction share, and a striking figure for a one-page builder. Technology, Information and Internet (4.71%), IT Services and IT Consulting (4.58%), Marketing Services (3.95%), Software Development (3.91%) and Advertising Services (3.91%) follow. The pattern is consistent: independent consultants and small agencies who need a professional single page and nothing more.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/carrd-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Carrd Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Carrd only for small businesses? Overwhelmingly, and by the widest margin in our data. 91.42% of Carrd users have 1–10 employees, the highest micro-business concentration of any platform in this category, with another 6.81% at 11–50, putting 98.23% below fifty people. Only 1.76% of the base is larger, and exactly one organisation with 10,001+ employees appears in our detections. This is the most solopreneur-heavy platform we track anywhere. It is also the youngest: 48.79% of Carrd organisations were founded in the 2020s and 87.78% since 2010.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/carrd-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Carrd Market Share Among CMS &amp; Website Builders</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Carrd&apos;s market share? Carrd holds 0.04% of the CMS and website-builder category, ranking #68 of the 750 platforms we track in it. That number is close to meaningless on its own, because Carrd is not competing with general website builders, it makes deliberately single-page sites. Against the tools it actually overlaps with, Carrd is #3 by detected domains: ClickFunnels (17,866), Unbounce (8,755), Carrd (5,377), LeadPages (2,746), Swipe Pages (629), Instapage (562), Landingi (471). Note that Carrd reaches that position at a fraction of its competitors&apos; price, its Pro tiers start at single-digit dollars per year, against Unbounce&apos;s monthly subscriptions.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/celebrity-influencer-ad-purchases-by-country-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Who Buys From Influencer Ads? Top Countries 2025 (Philippines 54%)</image:title>
      <image:caption>When asked whether they had purchased a product because of a celebrity or influencer advertisement, 54 percent of consumers in the Philippines said yes, the highest of 32 countries surveyed. Indonesia (52 percent) and Brazil (49 percent) followed, while mature Western markets sat far lower, underscoring how emerging economies in Asia and Latin America lead influencer-driven commerce.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/centos-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use CentOS? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use CentOS the most? The United States leads with 3,270 matched companies, 20.8%, then the United Kingdom (1,189 / 7.6%), Italy (803 / 5.1%), India (746 / 4.7%) and Germany (698 / 4.4%). Two rows read differently against our Ubuntu profile, where the same measurement exists: Italy is 5.1% here and 2.9% there, and Japan reaches 3.3% without appearing in Ubuntu&apos;s top twelve at all. India goes the other way, 4.7% against 9.5%. The fifteen countries listed cover 11,009 of the 15,734 matched companies, 70.0%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/centos-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use CentOS the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 7.91%, with Software Development second on 4.58%, which is where any server operating system lands. Nothing passes 8%, and the ten rows in our data together account for 33.57% of the 12,920 companies with a recorded industry. That flatness is expected: an operating system does not pick an industry, it picks whoever runs their own servers. The two rows that break the pattern sit just outside the six shown here, and they are worth the scroll.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/centos-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CentOS Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies run CentOS? Mostly small ones. 53.42% of the companies we can size employ 1 to 10 people and another 23.78% employ 11 to 50, so 77.20% sit under fifty staff, which is the signature of cheap shared hosting rather than a procurement decision. The head is heavier than Ubuntu&apos;s, though. 485 organisations here employ more than 1,000 people, 3.43%, against 1.95% on our Ubuntu profile, and that band is where the universities and telecom operators sit. These shares describe the 14,151 matched companies that report a size, not all 32,041 domains.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/centos-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CentOS Market Share Among Operating Systems</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is CentOS&apos;s market share? CentOS holds 3.94% of the Operating Systems category and ranks 4th of 16, on 32,041 domains. Ubuntu (50.33%), UNIX (25.73%) and Debian (15.98%) sit above it, and all three are distributions you can still install and patch today. CentOS is the largest signal in this category with no supported release behind it. The ranking is a like-for-like comparison because all sixteen technologies here are found the same way, through an operating system token in an HTTP response header, so every count is a floor measured with the same ruler at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chargebee-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Chargebee? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Chargebee the most? The United States dominates with 41.40% of enriched companies, followed by the United Kingdom (12.23%) and Australia (6.99%). Germany (4.89%), Canada (3.93%), and the Netherlands (3.23%) round out the top six, with English-speaking markets accounting for roughly two-thirds of the base — a reflection of Chargebee&apos;s Chennai origins alongside its North American go-to-market.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chargebee-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Chargebee the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development is the dominant industry at 18.79%, followed by Technology, Information and Internet (9.58%) and IT Services and IT Consulting (8.76%). Combined, technology verticals account for over 37% of Chargebee customers. Advertising Services (5.15%) and E-Learning Providers (3.25%) follow — subscription content businesses, which is the second natural fit for recurring billing after SaaS.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chargebee-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Chargebee Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Chargebee only for startups? Mostly, but it is the most mid-weighted of the billing platforms here. 53.7% of Chargebee domains belong to companies with 1-10 employees — against Paddle&apos;s 74.31% — and a notably high 32.45% sit at 11-50, with a further 11.11% at 51-200. Only one organisation in the enriched sample has 10,001+ employees. That distribution is what a product sold to funded startups rather than solo developers looks like, based on our analysis of 1,145 enriched companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chargebee-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Chargebee Market Share Among Payment Processing</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Chargebee&apos;s market share? Chargebee holds 0.03% of the Payment Processing category and ranks #29, in a list dominated by general-purpose processors and — for most rows above it — the accepted-card logos Shopify renders in storefront footers. Neither is what Chargebee does. Within subscription billing it sits alongside Paddle (4,052 domains) and Recurly, based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains at TechnologyChecker.io. Gartner named Chargebee a Leader in the 2025 Magic Quadrant for Recurring Billing Applications, and its $3.5B valuation reflects a position that browser-side detection systematically understates.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chart-js-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Chart.js? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Chart.js the most? The United States leads with 45,822 domains, followed by Germany (15,387) and the United Kingdom (12,942). Spain (11,596), Italy (10,806), India (9,930), France (9,361) and Brazil (9,248) sit close together behind them. Chart.js is noticeably less US-concentrated than most technologies we track: the United States is only about three times Germany here, where a ten-to-one gap is more typical. The Netherlands (8,312), Australia (7,358) and Canada (6,456) complete the top eleven. These counts cover the 213,015 companies we could match to a location, not every detected domain.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chart-js-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Chart.js the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Real Estate is the largest vertical at 8,627 companies (4.73%), ahead of Construction (7,504, 4.11%) and IT Services and IT Consulting (6,888, 3.78%). Software Development sits seventh at 4,738 (2.60%). For a JavaScript library that ordering is unusual, and it is the clearest evidence that Chart.js mostly arrives bundled in a website build rather than being picked by a software team. Estate agencies and contractors do not evaluate charting libraries; their theme does it for them. The tail is long and flat, with no industry above 5%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chart-js-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Chart.js Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Chart.js only for small businesses? Mostly, yes. 62.19% of matched companies have 1-10 employees and 85.89% have fewer than 50. Only 611 companies (0.31%) fall in the 10001+ bracket. The head of the list tells a different story: the most-followed organisations we detect are almost all enterprises, including IBM, Tech Mahindra, Broadcom and Siemens Healthineers. For a company that size a Chart.js detection is normally one microsite or one subdomain, not a company-wide standard. These percentages describe the 213,015 companies we could enrich, not all 303,679 domains.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chart-js-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Chart.js Market Share Among Charting &amp; Data Visualization</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Chart.js market share? Chart.js commands the largest share of the Charting &amp; Data Visualization category at 68.67%, ranking #1 of the 55 technologies we track in it. The distance to second place is the real story. Highcharts sits at 5.24% (23,176 domains) and ApexCharts.js at 4.53% (20,026), so Chart.js is detected on roughly thirteen times as many domains as its nearest rival. A share that large is partly a function of where Chart.js lives. Because it ships inside WordPress themes and plugins, it accumulates domains that never made a charting decision at all, while the commercial libraries below it are almost always deliberate purchases. Data from our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chatgpt-bot-share-trend-may-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GPTBot vs ClaudeBot vs Bytespider Crawl Share, Feb 23 – May 25, 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>ClaudeBot held a steady 11–12% of AI bot traffic from late February through April, consistently ahead of a more volatile GPTBot. In May the picture flipped: ClaudeBot fell to roughly 9.4–9.7% and stayed there, while GPTBot averaged 11.48% for the month to take the lead. The bigger mover is Bytespider (ByteDance), which climbed steadily from 3.5% in late February to over 11% by late May, overtaking ClaudeBot to become the #4 AI crawler. By the final week the three were converging again — a reminder that crawl share is bursty and tied to training runs.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chatgpt-weekly-active-users-2022-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ChatGPT Weekly Active Users 2022–2026: From 1M in 5 Days to 900M in 38 Months</image:title>
      <image:caption>ChatGPT reached 900 million weekly active users in February 2026, doubling its 400 million WAU base from one year earlier. The growth curve is the fastest in consumer technology history: 1 million users in 5 days, 100 million in two months, 800 million in three years. At the current trajectory, OpenAI is on pace to cross 1 billion weekly active users before the end of 2026.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chipbot-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use ChipBot? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use ChipBot the most? Brazil dominates with 92% of all customers (1,159 of 1,260 enriched companies), based on our analysis at TechnologyChecker.io. The United States represents just 3%, followed by minimal presence in the UK, Italy, and Portugal. This isn&apos;t a global chatbot platform. It&apos;s a Brazilian one that happens to have a few international users. The extreme geographic concentration positions ChipBot more as a localized e-commerce tool than a global SaaS product.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chipbot-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use ChipBot the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use ChipBot the most? Retail dominates at 45.91%, nearly half of all ChipBot customers, based on our analysis of 1,260 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. Textile Manufacturing follows at 4.73%, and Retail Apparel at 2.73%. This concentration is extreme. ChipBot isn&apos;t a horizontal chatbot tool. It&apos;s a vertical solution boosted for Brazilian e-commerce and brick-and-mortar retail stores. No other industry exceeds 5%, making the retail concentration the defining characteristic of ChipBot&apos;s customer base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chipbot-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ChipBot Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use ChipBot? The data is definitive: ChipBot is a micro-business platform. 77.9% of customers have 1-10 employees, based on our analysis of 1,260 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. Only 0.3% are enterprise-scale (500+ employees), with Gruporcarvalho (1,001-5,000 employees) and Cobreq being rare exceptions. Add in the 11-50 bracket (16.5%) and you&apos;re looking at 94.4% of the customer base under 50 employees.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chipbot-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ChipBot Market Share Among Live Chat &amp; Messaging</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is ChipBot&apos;s market share? ChipBot holds a 3.37% share of the chatbot market, ranking #5 behind Smooch (21.74%) and Say What (14.23%), based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. That puts it firmly in niche territory. But market share measured globally understates ChipBot&apos;s actual position, within Brazil specifically. It&apos;s a significant player given its 92% geographic concentration.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/chrome-market-share-trend-2025-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Chrome Browser Market Share Trend: 67.4% to 68.6% Over 12 Months</image:title>
      <image:caption>Chrome&apos;s share of human web traffic rose from 67.4% in June 2025 to 68.6% in June 2026. The gain wasn&apos;t dramatic — Chrome was already dominant — but it stepped up in September-October 2025, exactly when Safari stepped down, and held above 68% for the rest of the year. Chrome absorbed most of the share Safari lost over the same window.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cisco-email-security-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Cisco Email Security? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Cisco Email Security the most? The United States accounts for 3,285 of the 8,107 companies with a country on record, 40.52%, and Germany is second at 523 (6.45%), then Canada 452 (5.58%), Spain 355 (4.38%), France 298 (3.68%), the United Kingdom 289 (3.56%) and Israel 226 (2.79%). The eight European countries inside our top fifteen come to 2,170 companies, 26.77% of the matched base, so this is a genuinely international install base rather than a US list with a few outliers. Israel in seventh is the entry worth a second look, ahead of Australia, Belgium and India, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cisco-email-security-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Cisco Email Security the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Financial Services is the largest industry at 8.38% of the 7,542 companies with an industry on record, close to double Hospitals and Health Care at 4.47%, with IT Services (3.73%), Insurance (3.54%) and Construction (3.21%) behind it. Group the regulated verticals and the pattern sharpens: financial services, healthcare, insurance, banking and government administration come to 1,622 companies, 21.51% of the base. That is the buying pattern for an inbound mail gateway, where the driver is compliance and targeted phishing rather than mail volume, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cisco-email-security-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cisco Email Security Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Cisco Email Security only for large enterprises? No, but the enterprise weight is real: 1,365 of the 7,976 companies with a size on record employ more than 1,000 people, 17.11%, even though 1-10 is still the largest single band at 24.13%, ahead of 51-200 (19.86%) and 11-50 (17.85%). Read the small end with the unit in mind, because Cisco writes a per-customer allocation into the MX hostname and we grouped a sample by it: 323 domains with a readable allocation resolve to 228 separate accounts, 1.42 domains each, the largest holding 21 domains and 42.7% of sampled domains sitting in an account with more than one. A two-person domain on this list is often a subsidiary brand inside a much bigger contract, not a small customer.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cisco-email-security-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cisco Email Security Market Share Among Email Security</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Cisco Email Security&apos;s market share? It holds 1.47% of the Email Security category and ranks #9 of 12 tracked products, on 11,136 domains. Every rule in this category reads a domain&apos;s mail routing record, so the comparison is like-for-like rather than a mix of methods: Mimecast sits on 72,226 domains, MailChannels on 67,767, Barracuda on 66,670 and Proofpoint on 55,941, each at least five times Cisco&apos;s count. The category stays small because only organisations that deliberately put a gateway in front of their mail appear in it at all, which makes 1.47% a measure of live gateway deployments rather than of Cisco&apos;s security business, on our September 2026 counts at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ckeditor-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use CKEditor? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States is 6,457 of the companies we can place, with Germany second at 1,870, ahead of the United Kingdom (895) and France (805). Germany ranking second here, rather than fourth or fifth as it does in most of our data, is a real anomaly. We can measure it but not explain it: Drupal, which bundles CKEditor, is on only 2.41% of CKEditor&apos;s domains, so the obvious explanation does not survive contact with the numbers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ckeditor-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use CKEditor the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Spectator Sports leads at 11.94%, more than three times the next entry, Retail at 3.89%. No rich text editor wins a sports vertical on its features, so that number needs an explanation rather than a headline.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ckeditor-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CKEditor Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>61.97% of the companies we can size have 10 employees or fewer and 21.04% have 11 to 50. CKEditor is free and open source in its core edition, so there is no price barrier, and the size distribution reflects the population of small organisations running a CMS or a business application rather than any enterprise sales motion.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ckeditor-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CKEditor Market Share Among WYSIWYG Editors</image:title>
      <image:caption>CKEditor is third in WYSIWYG Editors at 20.73% of 189,196 domains, behind Froala (30.25%) and TinyMCE (27.67%). The gap to Froala is smaller than it looks: Froala is matched on classes left in published content, CKEditor on the editor script actually loading. Because an editor usually runs behind a login our crawler never reaches, this count is a floor, and it is a lower floor than a content-class rule would produce.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/claude-model-release-cadence-2024-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Claude Model Release Cadence 2024-2026: Anthropic Shipped 5 Major Models in 2025</image:title>
      <image:caption>Anthropic shipped 5 major Claude model releases in calendar 2025 — a 67 percent increase over 2024&apos;s 3 release events. The 2025 cadence (one release every ~73 days) was nearly twice the pace of 2024 (one every ~140 days). 2026 (partial, through May 18) already shows 3 release events at a sustained 2025-equivalent tempo.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/claudebot-share-of-ai-bot-traffic-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ClaudeBot Share of AI Bot Traffic 2025: From 8.5% to 12.5% Peak, with a 6% Trough in November</image:title>
      <image:caption>ClaudeBot&apos;s share of all AI bot traffic on Cloudflare&apos;s global network across calendar 2025. Monthly averages computed from weekly Cloudflare Radar data. The series shows a summer surge (peaking at 12.46% in July), a deep autumn decline (6.95% in November — the lowest since pre-Claude-3.5), and a Q4 recovery back to 11.73% by December as the Opus 4.5 release drove fresh crawling activity.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cleantalk-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use CleanTalk? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use CleanTalk the most? The United States leads with 41.9% of companies whose country we know (15,005), followed by the United Kingdom (8.6%), and then a distinctly European tier: the Netherlands at 6.1% (2,172) ahead of Germany at 5.9% (2,126), with Australia (5.5%), Canada (4.9%), France (3.6%) and Italy (2.4%) behind. The Netherlands placing third is unusual and worth noting, since it is a market that rarely appears that high in our data. English-speaking countries account for 60.9% of the base and Europe for 36.5%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cleantalk-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use CleanTalk the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use CleanTalk? Construction tops the list at 6.62%, more than double the second-place vertical, followed by Medical Practices (3.03%), Retail (2.95%), Real Estate (2.89%) and Business Consulting and Services (2.88%). No other industry exceeds 3%. The construction concentration is the same pattern we see across WordPress-heavy tooling: small contractors running a WordPress site with a contact form, which is precisely the surface that attracts the spam CleanTalk exists to block.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cleantalk-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CleanTalk Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use CleanTalk? It is overwhelmingly a small-business tool. 63.69% of CleanTalk sites we can size have 1-10 employees and another 25.39% have 11-50, putting 89.08% under fifty people, based on 36,704 enriched companies. The tail is thin but not empty: 29 organisations at 10,001+ employees run it, among them First Student, Quad, Camping World and SP Plus, and a further 178 sit in the 1,001-5,000 band. The pattern is what you would expect from a plugin bought per-site rather than per-enterprise.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cleantalk-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CleanTalk Market Share Among Bot Detection &amp; CAPTCHA</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is CleanTalk&apos;s market share? CleanTalk holds 1.00% of the bot detection and CAPTCHA category, ranking #5 of 32 tools, behind reCAPTCHA (65.26%), Cloudflare Bot Management (26.04%), Cloudflare Turnstile (3.68%) and hCaptcha (3.44%). That ranking is a poor description of the product, though, because the four platforms above it are general bot-mitigation layers and CleanTalk is a WordPress anti-spam plugin. The comparison that matters is with Akamai Bot Manager (24,142 domains), which CleanTalk now outnumbers two to one, and with the free CAPTCHA widgets it displaces on small sites.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/clerk-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Clerk? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Clerk the most? The United States leads with 2,093 companies (54.7%), followed by the United Kingdom at 389 (10.2%), India at 6.5%, Canada at 5.3% and Australia at 5.2%. Clerk&apos;s distribution is the classic developer-tool shape: one dominant English-speaking market, a long tail of technical hubs, and no single European country above 3%. Denmark, which the previous version of this page wrongly reported as Clerk&apos;s leading market, holds 39 companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/clerk-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Clerk the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads Clerk&apos;s industry mix at 16.15%, followed by Technology, Information &amp; Internet at 14.56%. Together those two account for 30.7% of all enriched deployments — the highest technology concentration of any authentication platform we track. IT Services &amp; Consulting (4.48%), Financial Services (3.85%) and Real Estate (2.68%) follow at a distance. Retail, which an earlier version of this page reported as Clerk&apos;s largest vertical at 24.3%, does not appear in the top five; that figure belonged to a different company.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/clerk-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Clerk Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Clerk only for small teams? Almost. 76.25% of detected Clerk customers have 1-10 employees, based on 5,555 enriched companies, and adding the 11-50 band brings small-company concentration to 93.96%. Only 4.04% sit in the 51-200 range and 1.37% in 201-500. Ten companies in the dataset have more than 1,000 employees. This is the steepest small-company skew in the identity category — Auth0, by comparison, puts 37.71% in the 1-10 band and 18.04% in 51-200.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/clerk-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Clerk Market Share Among Identity &amp; Access (SSO/CIAM)</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Clerk&apos;s market share? Clerk holds 0.85% of the Identity &amp; Access (SSO/CIAM) category, ranking 8th by detected domains. That percentage needs a caveat: the category&apos;s two largest members are Facebook Login (63.43%) and Google Sign-in (22.36%), which are social login buttons rather than identity platforms, and together they account for 86% of the category&apos;s domains. Among the developer-facing authentication platforms a team would actually shortlist — Clerk, Auth0, Okta, Amazon Cognito, Stytch, Descope — Clerk is the largest by a wide margin, with 8,315 domains against Auth0&apos;s 4,812 and Okta&apos;s 1,529.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/clickcease-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use ClickCease? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use ClickCease the most? The concentration is extreme. The United States leads with 11,648 companies (57.1% of the enriched base), followed by Canada (1,857), Australia (1,613) and the United Kingdom (1,446). Those four markets alone account for roughly 81% of matched companies, and the drop to fifth place is steep — the Netherlands at 390. Click fraud protection is bought where PPC costs most and local-service competition is fiercest, and that is a small set of mature English-language ad markets.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/clickcease-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use ClickCease the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>ClickCease has the clearest vertical signature in this refresh batch. Construction leads at 9.1%, nearly double the next entry, followed by Real Estate (4.81%), Software Development (3.91%), Medical Practices (3.85%), Retail (3.53%) and Advertising Services (3.46%). Taking the local-services cluster together — construction, real estate, medical practices, consumer services (3.4%), law practice (2.96%) and individual and family services (2.95%) — the total reaches roughly 27% of matched companies. These are the sectors where a single click on a local-service keyword can cost £20 or more and a competitor clicking your ads all afternoon is a measurable loss.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/clickcease-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ClickCease Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use ClickCease? 50.12% of matched companies have 1-10 employees and 33.16% have 11-50, so 83.3% sit under 50 people, based on 20,407 enriched companies. The enterprise end is almost empty: just 0.08% have 10,001+ employees, the lowest enterprise share in this refresh batch. That is by design — ClickCease is CHEQ&apos;s SMB tier, and large advertisers either run CHEQ&apos;s enterprise products or handle invalid traffic in-house. The 11-50 band at 33.16% is unusually fat, and it is where the money is: businesses with real ad budgets but no in-house PPC team.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/clickcease-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ClickCease Market Share Among Fraud Prevention</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is ClickCease&apos;s market share? ClickCease holds 21.01% of the Fraud Prevention category on 31,677 domains, ranking #2 of 32 behind Google Ad Traffic Quality (44,668 domains, 29.63%). There is an irony in that pairing worth stating: Google&apos;s own invalid-traffic product leads the category ClickCease exists to serve, and the two barely coexist — Google Ad Traffic Quality appears on just 0.08% of ClickCease domains. These are two distinct populations, not a shared market. The remaining leaders — Forter (19,208), Confiant (10,932), Sift (10,581) and NoFraud (6,263) — mostly address payment and transaction fraud rather than click fraud, so they are adjacent rather than competing.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/clickfunnels-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use ClickFunnels? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use ClickFunnels the most? The United States leads by a wide margin with 3,435 domains, ahead of the United Kingdom (405), Canada (314) and Australia (292). Germany is the strongest non-English market at 195, followed by France (93), the United Arab Emirates (78) and the Netherlands (78). These counts cover the 6,562 domains we could match to an enriched company record rather than the full detected base, and the ordering tracks ClickFunnels&apos; English-language marketing playbook more than anything about the product.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/clickfunnels-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use ClickFunnels the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Advertising Services leads at 10.83%, followed by Professional Training and Coaching (8.60%) and Business Consulting and Services (6.91%). Those three account for 26.34% of the enriched base. Add Wellness and Fitness Services (5.60%) and Marketing Services (5.14%) and the picture is unambiguous: this is a platform for businesses that sell expertise and generate leads, not one for product catalogues. Real Estate (4.02%) and Financial Services (3.85%) come next, both industries where commission-driven agents buy their own tools.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/clickfunnels-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ClickFunnels Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is ClickFunnels only for small businesses? Almost entirely: 72.02% of enriched ClickFunnels companies have 1-10 employees, based on 6,562 matched records. Add the 11-50 bracket (22.16%) and 94.18% of the base employs fewer than 50 people. Above that the numbers collapse: 4.45% sit in 51-200, 0.78% in 201-500, and only six companies report 10,001+ employees. The larger organisations that do appear, such as Teach For America and CrossCountry Freight Solutions, run ClickFunnels on a campaign or recruitment page rather than as company-wide infrastructure.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/clickfunnels-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ClickFunnels Market Share Among Marketing Automation</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is ClickFunnels&apos; market share? ClickFunnels holds a 1.59% share of the Marketing Automation market, ranking #9 of the 415 technologies we track in the category, based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains at TechnologyChecker.io. HubSpot takes 47.55% of the category on 583,796 domains and HighLevel follows at 8.91% on 109,442, so ClickFunnels sits well down the tail. Share is calculated on domains, and since funnels hosted on clickfunnels.com subdomains are not counted, the real footprint is larger than 1.59% implies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloud-big-three-traffic-share-trend-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Cloud Was 2026&apos;s Real Traffic-Share Gainer, Not Azure</image:title>
      <image:caption>Cloudflare Radar NetFlows, pulled on clean per-calendar-month windows, tells a sharper story than the quarterly average. AWS is the flat behemoth — its share never left a 3.28%–3.65% band and stayed within a third of a point of 3.30% in four of five months. Google Cloud is the genuine climber, adding roughly half a point of global share from 2.39% in January to a 2.95% April peak before settling at 2.87% in May. Azure looks flat-to-up every month except a March dip to 1.43% — the single month that dragged the Q1 average down to 1.61% and made Azure&apos;s recovery to 1.70% in May read as a 58% year-over-year surge against a weak base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloud-ecosystem-traffic-share-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Top 6 Cloud and Platform Networks by Global Traffic Share in Q1 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Six cloud and cloud-adjacent networks — AWS, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Akamai, and Hetzner — carry a combined 11.37% of all global internet traffic in Q1 2026. Meta at 1.62% essentially ties Azure. Hetzner at 1.07% handles more European traffic than AWS does.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloud-infrastructure-market-share-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloud Market Share Q1 2026: AWS 28%, Azure 21%, Google Cloud 14%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Enterprise spending on cloud infrastructure services reached $128.6 billion in Q1 2026. Amazon Web Services held 28% of that spending, Microsoft Azure 21% and Google Cloud 14%, putting the big three at 63%. Figures are from Synergy Research Group&apos;s own release of 29 April 2026.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloud-infrastructure-market-share-q2-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloud Market Share Q2 2026: AWS 28%, Azure 20%, Google Cloud 15%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Enterprise spending on cloud infrastructure services reached $143.4 billion in Q2 2026, growing 43% year over year — the highest rate in eight years. Amazon Web Services held 28% of that spending, Microsoft Azure 20% and Google Cloud 15%, putting the big three at 63% of the total. Synergy attributes the acceleration to generative AI demand.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloud-market-segment-growth-2023-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloud IaaS Growth Accelerates to 24.8% in 2025, Fastest Segment</image:title>
      <image:caption>Infrastructure as a service is forecast to grow 24.8% in 2025, against 21.5% for the public cloud market overall. It is the only segment accelerating in both 2024 and 2025, rising from 19.1% to 21.3% to 24.8%. Desktop as a service is the only segment decelerating, falling from 11.4% to 7.7%. IaaS is the segment AWS sells most of, which independently corroborates the reacceleration visible in Amazon&apos;s own quarterly filings.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloud-network-yoy-traffic-growth-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloud Network Traffic Growth Q1 2026 YoY: Azure +58%, Google Cloud ASN +56.8%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Microsoft Azure&apos;s global traffic jumped 58% year over year — the largest single-year gain of any major cloud network. Google&apos;s cloud-specific ASN (AS396982) grew 56.8% as workloads migrate off the legacy multi-purpose AS15169. AWS&apos;s European traffic grew 49.9%. Meanwhile, AWS (-12.6%) and Google (-15.5%) in North America lost relative share to faster-growing consumer traffic, not to each other.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloud-origin-request-share-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>AWS Serves 55.6% of Hyperscaler Origin Traffic in August 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Measured at Cloudflare&apos;s edge, Amazon Web Services received 55.55% of all requests routed to the four hyperscaler origins between 2 and 30 August 2026, against 26.46% for Google Cloud, 17.05% for Microsoft Azure and 0.93% for Oracle Cloud. This is a traffic measurement rather than a spending one, and it uses the same four-vendor denominator as Wikibon&apos;s market-share series, which put AWS at 51.3% for 2024.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloud-provider-global-traffic-share-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Big Three Cloud Traffic Share Q1 2026: AWS 3.40%, Google 2.55%, Azure 1.61%</image:title>
      <image:caption>AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure collectively carry 7.57% of all global internet traffic in Q1 2026. AWS leads at 3.40% (roughly 1 in 29 bytes), Google Cloud sits at 2.55%, and Azure at 1.61%. Azure posted a 58% year-over-year traffic gain, the largest single-year increase of any hyperscaler.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloud-region-count-comparison-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloud Region Count Comparison 2026: Azure 75, Oracle 53, GCP 48, AWS 42</image:title>
      <image:caption>Microsoft Azure leads all hyperscalers with 75 regions — nearly double AWS&apos;s 42. But region count is a compliance and latency bet, not a traffic indicator: AWS carries more than double Azure&apos;s global traffic despite running fewer regions. Oracle&apos;s 53 regions reflect its enterprise database customer base, each region opened where a large client requires data residency.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloud-security-priorities-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloud Security Priorities 2024: Threat Detection Leads at 47%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Among 813 cybersecurity professionals surveyed in April 2024, threat detection and response was the leading cloud security priority at 47%, followed by user education and awareness at 46% and end-to-end visibility and monitoring at 43%. Prevention ranked last at 21%, indicating that the profession has shifted toward detecting and containing incidents rather than expecting to stop them.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudflare-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Cloudflare? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Cloudflare the most? The United States accounts for 1,512,583 of the enriched companies we can place (40.42%), followed by the United Kingdom (349,414), Canada (171,566), Australia (162,890), Brazil (159,271) and India (156,468).The US share is lower here than on almost any other technology we track, and that is the point: a free tier with no sales motion spreads further from its home market than a product with a sales team does. Brazil and India both outrank Germany.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudflare-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Cloudflare the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 4.99% of enriched companies, followed by IT Services and IT Consulting (3.9%), Software Development (3.38%) and Construction (3.29%).This is the flattest industry table on the site, and the flatness is the finding. Nothing clears 5%. Cloudflare has no vertical because it has no vertical: it is infrastructure that every kind of business puts in front of its website.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudflare-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloudflare Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Cloudflare only for small sites? By count, overwhelmingly. 65.32% of the 4,008,345 enriched companies employ 10 people or fewer and another 22.85% employ 11-50. Companies of 1,000 or more account for about 1%.That distribution is what a free tier looks like at scale, and it coexists with a genuine enterprise base: the largest organisations on the list include Accenture, IBM, JPMorgan Chase and Allianz. Both facts are true because the same product is given away and sold.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudflare-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloudflare Market Share Among CDN</image:title>
      <image:caption>Cloudflare holds a 47.33% share of the CDN category and ranks #1 of the 59 technologies we track there, with more domains than every other member combined.The category is mechanically mixed and the share should be read with that in mind. Four of the five next-largest members are public library CDNs - cdnjs (2,169,707), jsDelivr (2,155,845), Google Hosted Libraries (1,590,708) and jQuery CDN (819,354). A site loads a script from those as well as running Cloudflare; they are not alternatives to it. Cloudflare&apos;s actual commercial peers sit further down: Amazon CloudFront (397,677), Bunny (144,294), Fastly (94,725) and Akamai (48,553).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudflare-turnstile-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Cloudflare Turnstile? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Cloudflare Turnstile the most? Turnstile has the most international footprint in this category, reaching 208 countries. The United States leads with only 32.2% of enriched customers, well below the 63.5% concentration we see on Akamai Bot Manager, followed by the United Kingdom (9.3%), Germany (5.7%), France (5.0%), the Netherlands (4.6%), Australia (4.4%), Canada (4.2%) and Spain (3.2%). English-speaking markets account for just 50.1% of the base. Western Europe is disproportionately represented relative to its share of the web, which is consistent with GDPR pressure pushing sites away from CAPTCHA products that send visitor data to a US advertising company.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudflare-turnstile-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Cloudflare Turnstile the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use Cloudflare Turnstile? The spread is genuinely horizontal, more so than anything else in this category: no industry exceeds 5.2%. Real Estate leads at 5.11%, followed by IT Services and IT Consulting (4.74%), Construction (4.19%), Software Development (4.1%), Advertising Services (3.3%) and Business Consulting (3.08%). That flatness is what you would expect from a free tool solving a universal problem. The one pattern worth noting is that the leaders are all form-heavy businesses, real estate listings, construction quotes and agency contact pages are exactly the endpoints spam bots target.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudflare-turnstile-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloudflare Turnstile Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Cloudflare Turnstile only for large enterprises? It is close to the opposite. 59.6% of Turnstile companies have 1-10 employees and 85.9% have 50 or fewer, while only 0.18% employ more than 10,000. That is the signature of a free product with a one-line install: Cloudflare made Managed mode free for unlimited use in September 2023, and the adoption curve since then has been driven by small sites, agencies and side projects rather than procurement cycles. Large organisations do use it, the University of California and Carrefour among them, but they are the exception in this base rather than the rule.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudflare-turnstile-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloudflare Turnstile Market Share Among Bot Detection &amp; CAPTCHA</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Cloudflare Turnstile&apos;s market share? Turnstile holds a 3.68% share of the bot detection and CAPTCHA market, ranking #3 of the 32 products we track, behind reCAPTCHA (65.26%) and Cloudflare Bot Management (26.04%) and just ahead of hCaptcha (3.44%), per our crawl of 28.2M domains. Share understates the momentum. reCAPTCHA&apos;s 65% is fifteen years of default-choice inertia, while Turnstile reached third place in under three years of general availability, and it is the only product in the category taking domains from reCAPTCHA at scale. Being free helps, and so does the fact that 63.46% of its domains already sit behind Cloudflare, where enabling it is close to frictionless.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudflare-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloudflare Usage Statistics 2010-2026: 9.2M Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Our long-run detection history first records Cloudflare in December 2010 and follows it to a peak of 5,056,020 active domains in April 2025. The current live crawl detects 9,236,181, up from 6,647,899 when that measurement began in June 2026.The two segments come from different measurement systems, with a step of about 1.3x across the join, so the level is not directly comparable either side of it. The June 2026 point also sits in the first month of the current crawl, while coverage was still expanding, so treat it as a floor rather than a reading.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudflare-workers-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Cloudflare Workers? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Cloudflare Workers the most? The United States leads with 3,824 domains, followed by the United Kingdom (661), the Netherlands (385), Canada (377), India (324) and Australia (313). Germany (235), Brazil (228) and France (204) come next, then Spain (118), Norway (77), Italy (75) and Switzerland (67). The Netherlands ahead of both Canada and India is the row that stands out, on a considerably smaller web than either. These are counts of the 8,757 domains we matched to a company record with a resolved country, so they describe where Workers-carrying sites are registered, not where anything is billed. The visibility caveat applies here too: a country whose sites happen to run Workers behind custom domains will look smaller than it is.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudflare-workers-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Cloudflare Workers the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail tops the table at 8.30%, 633 domains, ahead of Real Estate at 4.92% (375), Software Development at 3.89% (297) and Technology, Information and Internet at 3.26% (249). Retail Apparel and Fashion also makes the top ten at 2.24% (171). That is the surprise on this page. An edge compute runtime documented for developers should lead with software, and instead the two retail rows together outweigh Software Development and IT Services and IT Consulting (2.70%) combined. The stack data points the same way from another direction: Shopify runs on 26.55% of the Workers domains we can profile.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudflare-workers-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloudflare Workers Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Cloudflare Workers only for small companies? 60.23% of the domains we can size have 1 to 10 employees, 4,967 out of 8,247, with another 26.19% (2,160 domains) in the 11 to 50 band. Those two bands together are more than 86% of the sized base. At the other end there are just 11 domains at 10,001 or more employees and 15 in the 5,001 to 10,000 band. Read that top end as a floor inside a floor. The large-company detections we do have sit on hosts like flights.virginatlantic.com and resources.purolator.com, which is one team&apos;s route rather than a company standard, and an enterprise Worker running quietly behind a custom domain never reaches this table at all.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudflare-workers-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloudflare Workers Market Share Among PaaS</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Cloudflare Workers&apos; market share? Workers holds 0.79% of the PaaS category, ranking #12 of 41 ranked technologies, a long way behind Amazon Web Services (39.98%), Vercel (16.64%), WordPress.com (8.24%), Azure (7.5%) and Firebase (6.87%). That ordering says less about adoption than it appears to, because these platforms are not measured through equally wide windows. AWS, Azure and Firebase leave artefacts a site cannot easily avoid: hostnames, SDK files, storage endpoints. Workers leaves a self-declared runtime meta tag or a call to workers.dev, and a production deployment on a custom domain leaves neither. Compare these shares only with that asymmetry in mind.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudinary-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Cloudinary? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Cloudinary the most? The United States dominates with 43.31% of enriched customers, well ahead of the United Kingdom (7.04%) and India (6.28%). Australia (4.50%), France (3.40%), and Canada (3.25%) follow. Together, English-speaking countries account for close to 60% of the base, with France the strongest non-English market, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudinary-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Cloudinary the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Real Estate is the top industry at 9.62%, followed by Retail (5.3%), Hospitality (3.98%), Software Development (3.49%), and Restaurants (3.27%). The distribution is flat — no vertical exceeds 10% — which makes Cloudinary a genuinely horizontal platform. Real Estate leading is exactly what you would predict for an image-transformation service: property listings are the highest image-per-page business on the web, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudinary-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloudinary Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Cloudinary only for small businesses? Small teams are its core: 63.27% of Cloudinary domains belong to companies with 1-10 employees, based on our analysis of 44,863 enriched companies, and another 22.8% sit in the 11-50 band. The enterprise tail is small in count — 192 organisations with 10,001+ employees — but it is concentrated in a way worth understanding rather than celebrating: most of those large-company detections are on investor-relations subdomains built on a shared platform, not company-wide media stacks. See the industry detail below.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudinary-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloudinary Market Share Among CDN</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Cloudinary&apos;s market share? Cloudinary holds a 0.39% share of the CDN category and ranks #13, in a list headed by Cloudflare (47.33%), cdnjs (11.12%), and jsDelivr (11.05%). Those are not competitors in any useful sense — Cloudflare is a general-purpose network and cdnjs and jsDelivr serve JavaScript libraries. The comparison that matters is with other media CDNs, where Cloudinary&apos;s 76,200 domains lead Imgix (55,974), with Bunny (144,294) and Fastly (94,725) above it on volume but serving general traffic rather than image transformation. Based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudways-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Cloudways? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Cloudways the most? The United States accounts for 16,738 of Cloudways&apos; country-resolved domains, with the United Kingdom at 6,111, Canada at 2,899 and Australia at 2,728. The Netherlands (1,655), India (1,008), Brazil (895) and Italy (817) follow, then Germany (657), New Zealand (609), Israel (593), Ireland (497), Spain (490), France (380) and Norway (364). One caveat is worth ruling out rather than leaving to the reader: the response header we match Cloudways on ends in DE, which looks like it might pin this count to a German data centre and quietly make it a page about German customers. It does not. Germany is ninth on 657 domains, roughly 25 times smaller than the United States, so whatever that suffix denotes inside Cloudways&apos; cache tier, it is not selecting German customers. These are counts of domains matched to a company record, not shares of the full detected base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudways-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Cloudways the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Construction leads on 2,098 domains (5.52% of industry-resolved matches), followed by Advertising Services (1,303), Real Estate (1,128), Medical Practices (1,094), Business Consulting and Services (1,029) and Hospitals and Health Care (1,022). IT Services and IT Consulting is seventh on 1,008, Financial Services eighth on 996, then Non-profit Organizations (913) and Retail (902). No industry clears 6%, so the spread is genuinely horizontal, but its shape is the finding. Compare Render, another platform in this category, whose top industry is Software Development at 17.58%. Cloudways&apos; largest verticals are contractors, agencies, estate agents and clinics. Its customers are not developers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudways-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloudways Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Cloudways only for small businesses? Very nearly. 25,120 of the 40,970 domains we could match to a company and an employee band have 1 to 10 employees, or 61.31%. Add the 11 to 50 bracket (10,430 domains, 25.46%) and 86.77% of the matched base sits under 50 employees, with 51 to 200 adding another 3,632 (8.87%). Above that it thins fast: 1,060 domains at 201 to 500, 357 at 501 to 1,000, 288 at 1,001 to 5,000, 45 at 5,001 to 10,000 and 38 at 10,001 or more. The large organisations that do appear are running one site rather than an estate, which the detection URLs show directly: supplements.kerry.com for Kerry Group, ourstory.santos.com for Santos, investor-relations.davidlloyd.co.uk for David Lloyd Group.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cloudways-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cloudways Market Share Among PaaS</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Cloudways&apos; market share? Cloudways holds 2.78% of the PaaS category and ranks #8 of 41 ranked technologies. The denominator matters more than the percentage here. Amazon Web Services alone accounts for 936,363 domains and 39.98% of the category, more than 14 times Cloudways&apos; entire base, with Vercel (389,653), WordPress.com (193,092), Azure (175,651) and Firebase (160,932) also ahead of it. Four of those five are infrastructure and deployment targets sold to engineering teams. Cloudways sells a managed WordPress stack to small businesses and the agencies that build for them, and shares a category with them only because one label covers both.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/codeigniter-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use CodeIgniter? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>India is CodeIgniter&apos;s largest market by a wide margin at 8,907 matched companies, 23.05% of the geographic base, against 5,301 in the United States. Brazil (3,363), the United Kingdom (2,239), Indonesia (2,040) and Turkey (1,897) complete the top six. No other framework we publish is this concentrated outside North America and Western Europe.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/codeigniter-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use CodeIgniter the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 4.33%, followed by Real Estate (3.61%), Retail (3.06%), Construction (2.70%), Software Development (2.43%) and Higher Education (2.35%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/codeigniter-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CodeIgniter Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Three quarters of matched CodeIgniter companies employ fewer than 50 people: 50.03% at 1 to 10 and 25.43% at 11 to 50. A further 13.63% sit at 51 to 200. The large-enterprise tail is thin in percentage terms at 0.53% above 10,000 staff, but that still resolves to 197 organisations including national banks and government bodies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/codeigniter-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CodeIgniter Market Share Among Web Frameworks</image:title>
      <image:caption>CodeIgniter holds 3.44% of Web Frameworks and ranks 6th. The figure sits under a very top-heavy category: Microsoft ASP.NET takes 46.19% on a two-decade install base, and Ruby on Rails, Nuxt.js and Express together account for another 28.67%. Among PHP frameworks specifically, CodeIgniter is second only to Laravel (90,325 domains) and runs roughly three times the footprint of Yii.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/complianz-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Complianz? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Complianz the most? Unlike most WordPress plugins that see 50%+ U.S. concentration, Complianz tilts heavily European. The United States leads at roughly 20%, but the Netherlands, Germany, France, Spain, Belgium, and Finland collectively account for well over half the user base, per our analysis of 61,923 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. The European tilt makes sense: Complianz was built specifically for GDPR compliance by a Dutch team (Really Simple Plugins, now part of iubenda). Brazil and South Africa round out the top ten, driven by their own privacy regulations, LGPD and POPIA respectively.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/complianz-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Complianz the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use Complianz? Higher Education leads at 9%, followed by Government Administration (7%) and IT Services (6%), per our enriched data at TechnologyChecker.io. The tail spreads across dozens of verticals with no single industry exceeding 10%. That horizontal distribution makes sense. Every company serving EU visitors needs a cookie consent solution, regardless of what they sell. Privacy compliance is one of the few truly industry-agnostic requirements in web operations.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/complianz-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Complianz Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Complianz? Complianz defies typical WordPress plugin demographics. 39% of customers have 1-10 employees, far lower than the 80%+ micro-business concentration typical of WordPress plugins, per our analysis of 61,923 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. Over 21% of users have 500+ employees, and household names like Roche, Bayer, and Fujitsu rely on it. Privacy compliance doesn&apos;t scale with company size. It scales with regulatory risk. A 10-person EU startup needs consent management just as much as a 10,000-person multinational.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/complianz-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Complianz Market Share Among Consent &amp; Privacy Management</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Complianz&apos;s market share? Complianz holds 11.64% of the cookie consent category on 449,943 domains, ranking #2 behind CookieYes (19.9%). Within WordPress specifically the two are the dominant choices, and the difference between them shows in geography rather than features: Complianz skews continental European, CookieYes is more evenly spread between the US and UK.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/computer-vision-market-revenue-2020-2031.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Computer Vision Market 2020-2031: $25.92B in 2024 to $72.66B by 2031</image:title>
      <image:caption>The global computer vision market generated $25.92 billion in revenue in 2024 and is forecast to reach $72.66 billion by 2031, according to Statista Market Insights — a $46.74 billion expansion adding 180% over seven years. Computer vision is the smallest of the major AI segments but has the most linear growth curve, because revenue is tied to industrial cameras, automotive ADAS, and security systems — hardware-anchored categories that are more stable across capex cycles than software-only AI.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/constant-contact-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Constant Contact? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Constant Contact the most? The answer is overwhelmingly the United States, with 26,796 enriched companies (90.7% of the base), the most concentrated single-country footprint of any platform in this category by a wide margin. Canada follows at 1,589 companies (5.4%), and the United Kingdom trails at 466 (1.6%). Beyond these three markets, adoption drops off steeply: Australia (114), Mexico (37), and Ireland (37) round out the top countries. This extreme US concentration tracks with Constant Contact&apos;s positioning as a tool for local American small businesses, churches, and nonprofits, not a global enterprise platform. Percentages are shares of the 29,530 domains where we have a company country on file.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/constant-contact-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Constant Contact the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Non-profit organizations dominate at 10.27% of all Constant Contact customers, followed by retail (3.45%) and religious institutions (3.44%). This is a distinctive profile: Constant Contact is the only major email platform where nonprofits and churches outrank commercial industries, and by a factor of three. Civic and social organizations (3.04%) and wellness and fitness services (2.83%) round out the top five. The industry mix reflects a platform built for community engagement and donor communications, not ecommerce or SaaS marketing.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/constant-contact-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Constant Contact Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Constant Contact only for small businesses? Effectively, yes. Our analysis of 30,005 enriched companies shows that 58.5% have 1-10 employees, and another 28.1% have 11-50. That means 86.6% of Constant Contact&apos;s customer base is under 50 employees. The enterprise tail is thin at 0.12% with 10,001+ employees. Those large organizations tend to be government departments, hospital systems, and universities using the platform for a single programme or newsletter rather than company-wide marketing operations.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/constant-contact-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Constant Contact Market Share Among Email Marketing</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Constant Contact&apos;s market share? Constant Contact holds 1.52% of the Email Marketing market, ranking #12 in the category, based on our monthly crawl of 28.2M domains and 7,900+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. That puts it well behind leaders like MailChimp (21.24%) and Klaviyo (16.78%). But the raw share understates its hold on a specific niche: no other platform in this category is anywhere near 10% nonprofit, and 90.7% of its base sits in a single country.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/consumer-comfort-ai-advertising-tactics-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Consumer Comfort With AI Ad Tactics 2024: Most Stay Uneasy</image:title>
      <image:caption>During a January 2024 survey across 17 markets, over half — 51 percent — of consumers reported discomfort with brands using AI to create a virtual brand ambassador in place of a celebrity spokesperson. Around 48 percent were uncomfortable with AI-reliant product image editing and 47 percent with AI-generated product pictures. Comfort was highest for AI generating descriptions and taglines (43%) and deciding ad placement (42%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/consumers-comfort-brands-ai-2023-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Consumer Comfort With Brands Using AI: 57% to 46% in One Year</image:title>
      <image:caption>During a 2024 global survey, approximately 46 percent of consumers expressed comfort around brands using AI. A year earlier, that share stood at 57 percent. Consumer comfort with brand AI fell by 11 percentage points in twelve months, even as adoption accelerated — a widening gap between how fast brands deploy AI and how comfortable consumers feel about it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/consumers-trust-brands-ai-responsibly-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Consumer Trust in Brands to Use AI Responsibly 2024: Only 26% Say Yes</image:title>
      <image:caption>During a 2024 global survey, a little more than one-quarter — 26 percent — of consumers said they trusted brands generally to use AI responsibly. The remaining 74 percent did not, signaling a wide trust gap that brands deploying AI in customer-facing experiences must close.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/consumers-using-ai-purchase-research-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Consumers Using AI for Purchase Research 2025: Canada Leads at 51%</image:title>
      <image:caption>During a January 2025 survey of consumers in selected countries, 51 percent of respondents in Canada said they were likely to use AI tools to research purchases — the highest of the four markets. The United States followed at 49 percent, the United Kingdom at 47 percent, and Australia at 43 percent. Across all four, roughly half of consumers are open to AI-assisted shopping research.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/contentsquare-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Contentsquare? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Contentsquare the most? The United States leads with 5,870 of the 17,696 customers whose country we identified, ahead of the United Kingdom at 1,957 and Australia at 1,109. France, where Contentsquare was founded in 2012, places 4th with 756. The percentages shown in the table are calculated across the rows on display rather than the full set, so treat the ranking as the reliable part and read the counts for magnitude.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/contentsquare-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Contentsquare the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail is the largest single vertical at just 5.48%, with Software Development close behind at 5.35%. That is an unusually flat distribution. No industry clears 5.5%, and the top ten together account for barely a third of enriched deployments, which makes Contentsquare a genuinely horizontal purchase rather than a tool with a home vertical. Retail, Retail Apparel and Fashion, and Advertising Services together reach 10.14%, the closest thing to a cluster in the data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/contentsquare-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Contentsquare Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Contentsquare only for large enterprises? The company sells that way, but our detection data does not look that way. Companies with 1 to 50 staff account for 75.1% of the 17,812 enriched deployments where we know headcount, and only 11.02% employ more than 200. We checked whether that was an artifact and it is not: Contentsquare&apos;s domains map to distinct companies at a ratio of 1.01 to 1, so these are not one enterprise&apos;s branch sites counted many times over. Read the table as a domain count, where a global retailer and a two-person agency each contribute one row.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/contentsquare-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Contentsquare Market Share Among Heatmaps &amp; Session Recording</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Contentsquare&apos;s market share? Contentsquare holds 1.94% of Heatmaps &amp; Session Recording and ranks 4th of 34 tracked tools, behind Microsoft Clarity at 53.63% and Hotjar at 26.93%. That gap says less than it looks like it does. The two tools above it are free, so they spread across hundreds of thousands of small sites, while Contentsquare is sold as an enterprise contract. Contentsquare also owns Hotjar, which means the company&apos;s combined detected footprint across both brands is closer to 464,163 domains.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/contentsquare-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Contentsquare Usage Statistics 2014-2026: 31K Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Our records for Contentsquare begin with a single domain in 2014 and reach 31,126 today. Do not read the series as a like-for-like count. The set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly found ones added, and the signals we detect Contentsquare with widen over time. The step between our 2025 coverage and our 2026 coverage reflects both of those changes on our side rather than a sudden rush of adoption, so read the long-run shape as a trend and the current level as the number that counts.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/convert-com-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Convert? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Convert the most? The customer base clusters tightly in three countries. The United States leads at 54.0% (575 of 6,651 enriched companies), followed by the United Kingdom at 11.5% and the Netherlands at 9.3%, per our data at TechnologyChecker.io. Those three countries account for 74.8% of all enriched customers. Australia (3.3%), Canada (3.1%), and Italy (2.4%) round out the top six. The 9.3% Dutch concentration is unusually high for a country of 17 million, it may indicate a regional partnership or early adopter network in the Netherlands.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/convert-com-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Convert the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>What industries use Convert? Retail leads at 10.1% of enriched companies, followed by Software Development (6.7%), Retail Apparel (4.5%), and Technology/Internet (4.3%), per our data at TechnologyChecker.io. No single vertical dominates, the top 10 industries combined account for just 42.7%, making Convert a genuinely horizontal platform without strong vertical specialization. That cuts both ways for buyers: you won&apos;t hit feature gaps if you&apos;re outside a core vertical, but you also won&apos;t get industry-specific templates, experiment benchmarks, or vertical case studies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/convert-com-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Convert Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Convert? Convert skews heavily toward small businesses: 35.5% are micro-businesses (1-10 employees) and 25.1% have 11-50 employees. That&apos;s 60.6% with fewer than 50 people, per our analysis of 6,651 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. Mid-market companies (51-500) make up 27.9%, while enterprise accounts (1,001+) represent just 7.8%. The 1.1% enterprise penetration (10,001+) is a red flag for larger buyers: you won&apos;t find many Fortune 500 peers using this tool. Names like Adecco and Xerox appear in the data, but they&apos;re rare exceptions, not representative of the typical customer.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/convert-com-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Convert Market Share Among A/B Testing &amp; Experimentation</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Convert.com&apos;s market share? Convert.com holds 1.76% of the A/B testing category on 13,499 domains, ranking #6. It competes against Optimizely (5.66%) on price and privacy positioning rather than on breadth, and its footprint is roughly a third of Optimizely&apos;s.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/convertkit-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Kit (formerly ConvertKit)? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Kit the most? The United States dominates with 60.8% of matched customers, the second-highest single-country concentration in this category, though Kit&apos;s footprint reaches 117 countries in all. The UK (8.6%), Canada (6.9%), and Australia (3.4%) round out the top four. English-speaking markets account for nearly 80% of the user base, more than any other platform we track here. This makes sense given Kit&apos;s core audience of bloggers, podcasters, and course creators producing English-language content. Percentages are shares of the 7,626 Kit domains where we have a company country on file.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/convertkit-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Kit (formerly ConvertKit) the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Professional Training and Coaching is the dominant industry at 11.59%, followed by Business Consulting and Services (7.91%) and Wellness and Fitness Services (5.38%). That top vertical is nearly double what any other platform in this category shows, and the top-three profile reflects Kit&apos;s creator and knowledge-worker audience: coaches, consultants, and fitness instructors building online businesses, based on our analysis of 8,712 enriched companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/convertkit-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Kit (formerly ConvertKit) Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Kit only for small businesses? Practically, yes. A striking 91.2% of Kit customers have 1-10 employees based on our analysis of 8,712 enriched companies, the highest micro-business concentration across any platform in this category, and 98.6% have fewer than 50. Only 1.4% have 51+ employees, and none of the fifty largest Kit domains we detect has more than 10,000 employees. There is effectively no enterprise tail here at all.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/convertkit-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Kit (formerly ConvertKit) Market Share Among Email Marketing</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Kit&apos;s market share? Kit (formerly ConvertKit) holds 0.69% of the Email Marketing market, ranking #15. That number looks small but reflects Kit&apos;s positioning: this isn&apos;t a general-purpose marketing suite chasing enterprise budgets. It&apos;s a creator-first email tool, and it has the smallest average customer of anything in the category. Kit&apos;s own rebrand announcement cited $41M ARR and an 80-person remote team at the time of the change in October 2024. Our rankings come from a monthly crawl of 28.2M domains and 7,900+ tracked technologies on TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cookie-consent-by-osano-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Cookie Consent by Osano? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Cookie Consent by Osano the most? Granular geographic data isn&apos;t available in our enriched dataset for this technology. That said, vendor documentation and customer stories point to North America and Europe as the main adoption hubs. The United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and France lead, which makes sense given GDPR (Europe) and CCPA (California) mandates. Osano&apos;s official docs claim support for 50+ countries with localized consent rules and language options. Our company sample backs this up. You&apos;ll find Shell in the UK, Roche in Switzerland, H&amp;M in Sweden, and Renault in France. U.S. Adoption is equally strong: Deloitte, Oracle, Taco Bell, and Fidelity all run Cookie Consent by Osano, driven by CCPA and the growing wave of state-level privacy laws. Without granular country-level detection data, deeper geographic breakdowns aren&apos;t possible for this technology.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cookie-consent-by-osano-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Cookie Consent by Osano the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use Cookie Consent by Osano the most? Our company sample shows heavy adoption in highly regulated sectors. Business Consulting leads at 16% (Deloitte, Genpact), followed by IT Services at 13% (Oracle, Fujitsu) and Retail at 10% (H&amp;M, Dollar General, Taco Bell). Oil &amp; Gas (Shell, BP), Financial Services (AXA, Standard Chartered, Fidelity), and Healthcare (IQVIA, Thermo Fisher) round out the top verticals. Government (French Ministry of Education), Defense (Lockheed Martin), and Hospitality (Hilton, Airbnb) are also represented, signaling broad horizontal appeal. This distribution mirrors privacy law impact precisely: industries that handle PII adopt consent tools to avoid GDPR fines of up to 20M EUR or 4% of revenue and CCPA penalties of ,500-,500 per violation, based on our analysis of 56,857 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cookie-notice-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Cookie Notice? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Cookie Notice the most? Based on our analysis of 88,297 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io, Cookie Notice shows strong adoption across European countries, no surprise given GDPR requirements. North American and Latin American organizations also feature prominently. The plugin&apos;s international footprint includes government agencies in Spain, Denmark, and Belgium; universities in Italy, France, and the Netherlands; and public sector organizations in Brazil and the Philippines. Without granular country-level detection data, precise rankings aren&apos;t possible, but Europe clearly leads adoption.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cookie-notice-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Cookie Notice the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use Cookie Notice the most? Cookie Notice shows strong vertical concentration in government administration, higher education, and nonprofit sectors, based on our analysis of 88,297 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. The user base includes government agencies across Spain, Denmark, Brazil, and the United States; research universities throughout Europe and Latin America; and international nonprofits like Medecins Sans Frontieres and Boys and Girls Club of America. This concentration makes sense, public sector organizations face strict regulatory compliance requirements and tend to favor free, well-established WordPress plugins.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cookie-notice-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cookie Notice Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Cookie Notice? Cookie Notice serves organizations across all size ranges. Our data highlights notable adoption among institutions with 5,001-10,000 employees, including major universities like Imperial College London and University of Bologna. Government agencies with 10,001+ employees also stand out: Junta de Andalucia and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania both run Cookie Notice, based on our analysis of 88,297 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. The plugin&apos;s free tier makes it especially attractive to budget-conscious public sector organizations that need compliance without business-grade pricing.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cookie-notice-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cookie Notice Market Share Among Consent &amp; Privacy Management</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Cookie Notice&apos;s market share? Cookie Notice holds 5.69% of the cookie consent category on 220,053 domains, ranking #6. It competes on being free and simple rather than on compliance depth — the paid platforms above it (Cookiebot, Usercentrics) scan and categorise trackers automatically, which a banner plugin does not attempt.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cookiebot-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Cookiebot? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Cookiebot the most? Based on our analysis of 65,095 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io, Cookiebot&apos;s user base skews heavily toward Europe. That&apos;s consistent with its origins as a GDPR compliance tool built in Denmark. Our top companies list includes organizations from Germany, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Sweden, and the Netherlands. US and UK firms with European operations also represent a sizable share, they need CMP coverage for their EU-facing web properties even if domestic regulations are less strict.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cookiebot-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Cookiebot the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use Cookiebot the most? Cookiebot&apos;s customer base spans a wide range of verticals. IT Services and Consulting, Financial Services, and Manufacturing all appear frequently in our enriched company data. The platform&apos;s appeal is genuinely horizontal. No single industry dominates because cookie consent is a regulatory requirement, not an industry-specific feature. Government agencies, healthcare providers, and luxury brands appear alongside tech companies in our detection data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cookiebot-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cookiebot Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Cookiebot? The top companies in our enriched dataset are overwhelmingly 10,001+ employee organizations, including Deloitte, McDonald&apos;s, Siemens, and IKEA. Unlike many SaaS tools where micro-businesses dominate, Cookiebot&apos;s detected customer base tilts toward mid-to-large enterprises that face strict regulatory obligations, based on our analysis of 65,095 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. That said, Cookiebot offers a free tier for sites under 50 subpages, attracting smaller websites too. The enterprise concentration in our data reflects our crawl&apos;s bias toward high-authority domains.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cookiebot-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cookiebot Market Share Among Consent &amp; Privacy Management</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Cookiebot&apos;s market share? Cookiebot holds 7.44% of the cookie consent category on 287,710 domains, ranking #5. One thing to hold in mind reading this table: Cookiebot and Usercentrics (2.58%) are the same company since the 2023 acquisition, so their combined footprint is around 10% of the category even though they appear as separate rows.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cookieyes-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use CookieYes? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use CookieYes the most? The United States leads at approximately 16.5% of all enriched customers, but CookieYes has a notably European footprint. The United Kingdom (10.8%) and Germany (8.0%) round out the top three. Together, EU and EEA countries likely account for over 45% of the user base, based on our analysis of 63,670 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. India at 6.2% is the notable outlier, driven largely by IT services firms deploying consent banners on client websites.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cookieyes-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use CookieYes the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use CookieYes the most? IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 9.0%, followed by Software Development (7.8%) and Higher Education (5.5%), based on our analysis of 63,670 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. The distribution is wide. No single industry exceeds 10%, making CookieYes a genuinely horizontal platform used wherever websites handle personal data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cookieyes-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CookieYes Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use CookieYes? Small businesses form the core, but they&apos;re not the whole story. With 40.5% of CookieYes customers having 1-10 employees and 22.3% at 11-50, a full 62.8% are businesses with fewer than 50 people. That&apos;s based on our analysis of 63,670 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. However, enterprises like Novartis, Sony, Lufthansa, and KPMG also rely on CookieYes for consent management on specific subdomains, proving the platform can scale when needed.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cookieyes-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>CookieYes Market Share Among Consent &amp; Privacy Management</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is CookieYes&apos;s market share? CookieYes holds 19.9% of the cookie consent category on 769,048 domains, ranking #1, ahead of Complianz (11.64%) and Cookiebot (7.44%). This is a genuinely fragmented category — no tool holds a fifth of it — which is what you would expect where the requirement is regulatory, the switching cost is a plugin swap, and price competition is fierce.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/countries-ai-cybersecurity-outlook-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Country Outlook on AI in Cybersecurity 2024: Australia 31.3%, Italy 2% (15x Gap)</image:title>
      <image:caption>Attitudes on AI in cybersecurity vary by a factor of 15 across countries. Australia tops at 31.3 percent, followed by Saudi Arabia (18.4 percent) and Japan (16.3 percent). The United States sits mid-pack at 10.6 percent despite being the epicenter of AI development. Italy trails at just 2 percent.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cpanel-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use cPanel? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use cPanel the most? The United States leads with 34.9% of all enriched cPanel customers, followed by the United Kingdom (7.3%) and Brazil (6.7%). English-speaking countries (US, UK, Australia, Canada) account for over 52% of the user base. Brazil&apos;s third-place position stands out for a hosting tool, suggesting strong shared-hosting adoption in Latin America, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cpanel-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use cPanel the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail is the top industry at 4.43%, followed closely by IT Services and IT Consulting (4.18%). The long tail is remarkably even: no single industry exceeds 4.5%, making cPanel a genuinely horizontal infrastructure tool used across every vertical, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cpanel-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cPanel Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is cPanel only for small companies? Mostly, yes. 67% of cPanel customers have 1-10 employees based on our analysis of 47,541 enriched companies, making cPanel firmly a small-company and freelancer tool. Still, 6.8% of detected users are companies with 10,001+ employees, including McDonald&apos;s, Tencent, BT, and CBRE, proving cPanel persists in large-company subdomains and internal tools.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cpanel-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cPanel Market Share Among Web Hosting</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is cPanel&apos;s market share? cPanel holds a 1.15% share of the Web Hosting market, ranking #17 among tracked hosting platforms. Cloudflare Hosting leads at 33.43%, roughly 29x cPanel&apos;s share, based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. cPanel&apos;s share reflects its role as a control panel layer rather than a standalone hosting provider, so many cPanel deployments sit behind other hosting brands like GoDaddy and Unified Layer.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/crazy-egg-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Crazy Egg? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Crazy Egg the most? The United States, by a distance: 20,681 of the 32,366 enriched companies are US-based, a little under two thirds of the enriched set. The United Kingdom (1,944), Canada (1,657) and Australia (1,466) follow, so four English-speaking markets account for 25,748 enriched profiles between them. Outside that group the tail is thin and unusually spread: India (582), Brazil (424), Spain (420) and New Zealand (386) all sit ahead of Germany (248) and France (224). For a product sold in English on a self-serve motion, that is the expected shape - adoption follows the marketing language rather than market size.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/crazy-egg-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Crazy Egg the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Real Estate leads at 5.51%, followed by Retail (4.53%), Construction (3.71%), Software Development (3.42%) and Advertising Services (3.19%). What stands out is how flat that is: no industry clears 6%, and the tenth-placed vertical (IT Services and IT Consulting, 2.64%) is within three points of the first. Crazy Egg is horizontal in the strict sense - nothing about the product or its pricing selects for a sector.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/crazy-egg-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Crazy Egg Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>44.25% of Crazy Egg&apos;s enriched customers have 1-10 employees, and 74.34% have fewer than 50. Only 0.75% have 10,001 or more. That is the single clearest fact about this install base: Crazy Egg is bought by small teams that want a visual answer about one page without commissioning an analysis. Hold that number against the company table further down, where almost every recognisable name sits in the 10,001+ bracket. Those companies are the 0.75%, not the norm; the typical Crazy Egg domain belongs to a business with a handful of staff.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/crazy-egg-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Crazy Egg Market Share Among Heatmaps &amp; Session Recording</image:title>
      <image:caption>Crazy Egg holds a 7.2% share of Heatmaps &amp; Session Recording and ranks third of 34 tracked technologies in a category covering roughly 1.70 million domains. The shape of the category matters more than the rank. Microsoft Clarity (54.3%, 923,836 domains) and Hotjar (25.87%, 440,057 domains) hold over 80% of it between them, and Crazy Egg&apos;s 122,407 domains are the entire remainder of the top tier - 3.6x the next tool down, Contentsquare at 33,934. This is a two-giant market with a clear third place and a long, thin tail, not a five-way race. The ranking itself is new: until this refresh the profile was filed under Web Analytics, where a heatmap tool was always going to read as a rounding error.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/creator-commerce-infrastructure-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Creator Commerce Infrastructure on Live Websites (June 2026)</image:title>
      <image:caption>TechnologyChecker&apos;s detection crawl of the open web finds TikTok&apos;s conversion-tracking pixel installed on 240,694 active websites in June 2026, with its video embed on a further 211,605 sites - the second-largest creator-commerce footprint after Meta&apos;s Facebook Pixel (2.06 million sites, tracked separately). Pinterest&apos;s conversion tag reaches 131,470 sites, while Snap Pixel and Instagram&apos;s embed each sit near 32,000-34,000. The pattern shows that the real plumbing of influencer marketing is the platforms&apos; own pixels and embeds, not third-party influencer-marketing software, which we detect on fewer than 300 sites apiece.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/crisp-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Crisp Chat? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Crisp the most? The United States leads with 21.4% of all customers, followed closely by France at 20.1%. An unusually high European concentration explained by Crisp&apos;s French origins (founded in Nantes in 2015). The United Kingdom (7.6%) rounds out the top three. Together, English-speaking countries account for roughly 34% of the user base, while French-speaking markets add another 22%, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/crisp-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Crisp Chat the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development dominates at 12.16%, followed by Technology, Information and Internet (8.28%) and IT Services (8.12%). Those three tech-adjacent verticals together account for nearly 29% of all Crisp customers. The long tail is broad. No single industry exceeds 13%, which makes Crisp a genuinely horizontal platform with a tech-first lean, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/crisp-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Crisp Chat Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Crisp only for small businesses? Mostly yes, but not entirely. With 62.88% of Crisp customers having 1-10 employees based on our analysis of 13,889 enriched companies, micro-businesses form the overwhelming majority. Add the 11-50 employee bracket (17.9%) and over 91% of Crisp&apos;s user base has fewer than 50 people. Still, enterprises like Capgemini, Bayer, and TELUS show the platform can handle large-scale deployments on internal tools and portals.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/crisp-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Crisp Chat Market Share Among Live Chat</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Crisp&apos;s market share? Crisp holds 0.8% of the live chat category on 23,596 domains, ranking #16. The raw placement matters less than the shape of its base: Crisp is a paid product in a category whose top ten is almost entirely free or bundled, and its customers are unusually technical — Software Development is 12.13% of its domains, second only to Intercom in this category.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/criteo-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Criteo? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Criteo the most? Among the 41,844 domains we can match to a company, the United States leads with 16,350 (39.1%), followed by the United Kingdom (3,011) and India (2,323). The distribution is genuinely global and unusually flat below the top: Brazil (1,439), Canada (1,261), Germany (1,179), Spain (1,053) and France (1,050) cluster closely, with Japan (612), Turkiye (613), Mexico (391) and China (345) all present. France is notable for being ninth rather than first: Criteo was founded in Paris in 2005, but its detected footprint long since stopped reflecting that.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/criteo-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Criteo the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 7.68%, which is what a commerce media company should look like, and no other vertical exceeds 5%. Technology, Information and Internet (4.69%), IT Services (3.26%), Restaurants (3.13%) and Software Development (2.83%) follow. The media cluster is the second story: Newspaper Publishing (2.70%) and Broadcast Media Production and Distribution (2.38%) together reach 5.08%, which would rank second overall. Those are publishers carrying Criteo tags to monetise inventory, not retailers buying retargeting, and they are a useful reminder that this page counts both sides of the marketplace.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/criteo-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Criteo Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Criteo only for large retailers? No, and the size distribution is more balanced than most tools we track. 58.65% of matched companies have 1-10 employees and 22.73% have 11-50, but the mid-market is well represented at 10.34% (51-200) and 3.91% (201-500), based on 41,844 enriched companies. Enterprises with 10,001+ employees account for 0.47%. Remember that a detected tag is not necessarily a client relationship, and the smallest domains are disproportionately publisher inventory rather than advertisers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/criteo-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Criteo Market Share Among Ad Networks</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Criteo&apos;s market share? Criteo holds a 2.39% share of the Ad Networks category on 110,313 detected domains, ranking #7. The names above it are mostly not competitors in the commercial sense. DoubleClick Floodlight (1,436,200 domains, 31.1%) and Google AdSense (677,940, 14.68%) are Google&apos;s measurement and publisher-monetisation tags, which sit on inventory Criteo also buys; our data shows Floodlight present on 58.63% of live Criteo domains. Microsoft Advertising (344,173), Pinterest Ads (316,487) and Twitter Ads (297,888) are channel-specific. Ad tags stack rather than displace, so share in this category measures co-presence on inventory, not a contest for a single slot.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/customer-io-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Customer.io? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States leads with 709 matched companies, ahead of the United Kingdom at 80 and Australia at 76, then Canada (52) and France (49). Australia sitting effectively level with the United Kingdom is the notable feature, since the UK market is several times larger; the same pattern appears in other developer-oriented messaging tools. The Netherlands (25), Germany (23) and Brazil (21) follow. Continental Europe is thin here relative to its size, which fits a product sold largely through self-serve signup in English to technical buyers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/customer-io-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Customer.io the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 12.56% and Technology, Information and Internet follows at 12.20%, so a quarter of matched companies are technology firms. Financial Services (6.80%), IT Services and IT Consulting (3.40%), Advertising Services (3.03%) and Wellness and Fitness Services (2.88%) come next. The concentration is real but much looser than 6sense&apos;s 42%: Customer.io is a general-purpose messaging engine that happens to be bought by people who can call an API, rather than a tool designed for one vertical.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/customer-io-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Customer.io Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Customer.io is a small-company product. 44.27% of matched companies have 1 to 10 employees and 37.71% have 11 to 50, so 81.98% are under fifty people. Only 3.32% reach the 201 to 500 band and just three matched companies exceed 10,000 employees. Combined with the age data, where 36.26% were founded in the 2020s, this is a base of young software companies rather than established enterprises. The product&apos;s usage-based pricing and API-first design both point the same way.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/customer-io-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Customer.io Market Share Among Marketing Automation</image:title>
      <image:caption>Customer.io holds 0.24% of the Marketing Automation category and ranks #38 of 415. Both figures understate it, for a reason that is structural rather than arguable. The category is measured by web presence, and Customer.io&apos;s core product is server-side: a company sends events from its own backend and Customer.io sends the messages, with nothing required on the website. Platforms such as HubSpot (583,796 domains) place a tag on every customer&apos;s site by design, so they are fully visible on this surface while Customer.io is only partly visible. The ranking measures web footprint, not market position.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/cybersecurity-action-drivers-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cybersecurity Action Drivers 2024: GenAI Emergence Tops at 47%</image:title>
      <image:caption>CompTIA&apos;s 2024 survey found 47 percent of technical and business professionals cite the emergence of generative AI as the main driver of cybersecurity actions. That is ahead of variety of attacks (44 percent), reliance on data (43 percent), and scale of attacks (41 percent). GenAI is both the weapon and the reason for the shield.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/data-center-average-pue-2007-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Global Data Center PUE 2007-2024: 2.5 to 1.56 (Plateaued Since 2018)</image:title>
      <image:caption>Global data center PUE improved from 2.5 in 2007 to 1.56 in 2024. But gains have plateaued since 2018 — the easy efficiency wins (hot-aisle containment, free cooling) are done. Further improvements will need liquid cooling and new rack designs built for high-density AI workloads.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/data-center-electricity-demand-2022-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Data Center &amp; Crypto Electricity Demand: 455 TWh (2022) to Forecast 830 TWh (2026)</image:title>
      <image:caption>In 2022, dedicated AI data centers consumed roughly zero terawatt-hours of electricity. By 2026, the IEA forecasts 90 TWh for AI data centers alone, on top of 580 TWh for traditional data centers and 160 TWh for cryptocurrencies. Total demand could hit 1,050 TWh in 2026 depending on scenario — comparable to adding the annual electricity consumption of a mid-sized country.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/data-center-pue-2007-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Global Data Center PUE 2007-2025: 2.5 to 1.54 (Efficiency Plateau)</image:title>
      <image:caption>Global average data center PUE improved from 2.5 in 2007 to 1.54 in 2025. Almost all of that gain happened before 2018. Since then the curve has flattened in the 1.5 to 1.6 band — the cheap efficiency wins like hot-aisle containment and free cooling are exhausted. Pushing lower now requires liquid cooling and rack designs built for high-density AI workloads.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/data-center-systems-spending-2012-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Data Center Systems Spending 2012-2026: $140B to a Forecast $582B</image:title>
      <image:caption>Worldwide spending on data center systems sat between $140 billion and $236 billion for over a decade, then broke sharply upward: $329.13 billion in 2024, an estimated $489.45 billion in 2025, and a forecast $582.45 billion in 2026. The 2024 to 2026 stretch nearly doubles a number that took 12 years to move from $140 billion to $236 billion. The surge is tied directly to generative-AI infrastructure buildout.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/data-center-systems-spending-growth-2016-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Data Center Systems IT Spending Growth 2016-2026: -10% to 48.8% Peak</image:title>
      <image:caption>Before 2024, data center systems spending growth typically sat in the -5 to +15 percent range. Then the line breaks upward: +39.4 percent in 2024, a record +48.8 percent in 2025, and a forecast +31.7 percent in 2026. No other IT segment shows a similar pattern. The inflection aligns with the mass adoption of generative AI workloads.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/datadog-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Datadog? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States leads with 50,840 domains (66.71%), ahead of the United Kingdom on 5,633 (7.39%), Canada on 3,108 (4.08%) and Australia on 2,818 (3.70%). Percentages are computed over the Datadog domains where we hold a country, not over all 148,622. Two thirds in one country makes Datadog the most US-weighted profile in this category, ahead of New Relic at 56.57% and Sentry at 41.39%. Part of that is a New York company selling hardest at home, and part of it is that the website platforms carrying the browser agent into the long tail are themselves North American. European detection stays modest: France 1.82%, Germany 1.70%, Spain 1.08%, Netherlands 1.02%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/datadog-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Datadog the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Restaurants is the largest vertical at 10.27% (6,751 domains), ahead of Financial Services on 8.48% (5,578) and Retail on 6.25% (4,108), with Software Development only fourth at 4.54%. Restaurants leading an infrastructure monitoring platform is a platform signature rather than a market fact, and it is worth understanding before you filter on it. The cohort is mostly single-location independents, neighbourhood delis, pubs and barbecue joints with no engineers and no servers to monitor, and their stacks are near-identical: 5,426 of the 6,751 run Cloudflare (80.4%), 2,994 run Sentry (44.4%), 2,839 run Cloudflare Bot Management (42.1%), 2,269 sit on GoDaddy (33.6%) and 2,090 carry Snowplow Analytics (31.0%). That is one website builder&apos;s shipped stack repeated thousands of times, not thousands of independent purchasing decisions.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/datadog-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Datadog Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>62.48% of enriched Datadog domains belong to companies of 10 or fewer employees and 84.63% to companies under 50, measured across the 74,152 domains carrying a size band, while companies above 1,000 staff account for 2.16%. That is a description of the detected population, not of Datadog&apos;s customer base. A ten-person business does not run the infrastructure Datadog monitors; it runs a website on a builder that ships a browser agent on every site it hosts. One caution on the records behind the table: a small number of company rows in our enrichment merge two different businesses, so read the bands as a distribution rather than as a verdict on any single company.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/datadog-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Datadog Market Share Among APM &amp; Error Tracking</image:title>
      <image:caption>Datadog holds 5.78% of the APM and Error Tracking category on 148,622 domains, third of 58 technologies behind Sentry (71.99%, 1,851,998 domains) and New Relic (8.81%, 226,775). Read that as a ranking of browser-visible agents rather than of monitoring spend. Datadog&apos;s largest products, infrastructure monitoring, APM and log collection, run inside a customer&apos;s own systems and never reach a public page, so a share built from client-side detection understates a platform whose business is server-side and flatters tools that live entirely in the browser. Sentry&apos;s 72% reflects an error-tracking SDK that almost every instrumented front end loads.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ddos-guard-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use DDoS-Guard? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use DDoS-Guard the most? Among the 10,375 companies we can identify, Russia dominates with 3,252 organisations (31.3%), more than four times the United States at 697. The United Arab Emirates (454) ranks third. Former Soviet states add materially to the total: Kazakhstan (296), Belarus (234), Uzbekistan (135) and Armenia (129) together account for a further 7.7%, so Russia and the CIS make up roughly 39% of identifiable customers. Western Europe is present but thin: the United Kingdom (232), Germany (134), Cyprus (117), Spain (110), France (101) and Poland (87). This distribution follows DDoS-Guard&apos;s Russian ownership and data-centre footprint, and the UAE and Cyprus entries are consistent with jurisdictions commonly used by Russian-linked corporate structures.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ddos-guard-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use DDoS-Guard the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use DDoS-Guard the most? The distribution is fragmented, with no vertical above 9%. IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 8.81%, followed by Business Consulting and Services (5.39%), Advertising Services (4.90%), Software Development (3.86%) and Technology, Information and Internet (3.76%). Technology-related sectors together account for roughly 18.7% of identifiable customers. Marketing Services (2.80%), Education (2.28%) and Staffing and Recruiting (1.89%) complete the top ten. The weighting toward IT and consulting firms suggests technical buyers who evaluate DDoS protection on price and capability rather than brand.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ddos-guard-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>DDoS-Guard Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use DDoS-Guard? 49.37% of identifiable DDoS-Guard customers employ 1-10 people, with another 31.58% in the 11-50 range, so roughly 81% sit under 50 employees. Mid-sized companies (51-200) represent 11.66%, and organisations with 10,001+ employees just 0.33% (33 companies). Read this against the 11.4% enrichment rate. The companies we can name skew small, and the 88.6% we cannot name are overwhelmingly domains with no corporate record anywhere, which is itself the most informative fact about this customer base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ddos-guard-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>DDoS-Guard Market Share Among WAF &amp; DDoS Protection</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is DDoS-Guard&apos;s market share? DDoS-Guard holds 37.79% of the WAF &amp; DDoS Protection category on 90,751 domains, ranking #2 of 18 tracked technologies. The gap to first place is remarkably narrow: Sucuri leads with 92,446 domains (38.49%), just 1,695 ahead. Together the two hold more than three-quarters of the category. Imperva (28,846, 12.01%) is a distant third, followed by Akamai Web Application Protector (13,510, 5.63%) and SiteLock (5,177, 2.16%). Note that this category measures reverse-proxy and edge protection services, which a site can generally run only one of. That exclusivity, discussed below, is what makes the share figures here behave differently from plugin-based security categories.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/debian-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Debian? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Debian the most? Germany leads with 17,850 of the 77,750 companies we could locate, 22.96%, and France is second on 11,843, 15.23%. The United States is third at 9,308, 11.97%, so Germany and France hold 29,693 companies between them against the American 9,308. That ordering is uncommon here, though not unique: it also shows up on European infrastructure and consent products like IONOS, OVH and Cookiebot. The difference is that those have sales teams in Europe and Debian has none. Twelve of the top fifteen countries are European and account for 49,665 companies, 63.88% of the located base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/debian-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Debian the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Real Estate leads at 5.96% and nothing reaches 6%. IT Services and IT Consulting follows at 4.93%, Retail at 4.45%, Construction at 3.99%, Business Consulting and Services at 3.85% and Software Development at 3.55%. Those six together are 26.74% of the 62,067 companies with a recorded industry, about as flat as any distribution we publish. Nobody sells Debian into a vertical, so this chart is closer to a census of who runs a website than a picture of who chose an operating system.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/debian-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Debian Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Debian? Small ones, overwhelmingly. 65.25% of the 64,938 companies we matched that report a headcount employ ten people or fewer and 21.3% employ 11 to 50, so 86.55% of this base sits at 50 staff or under. Only 1,059 companies, 1.63%, employ more than 1,000. The named list further down reads the opposite way because it is ordered by LinkedIn following, which is where H&amp;M group, Ohio State University and Freudenberg Group come from.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/debian-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Debian Market Share Among Operating Systems</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Debian&apos;s market share? Debian holds 15.98% of Operating Systems and ranks 3rd of the 16 technologies in that category, on 130,134 domains. Ubuntu (50.33%) and UNIX (25.73%) sit above it, and the three of them carry 92.04% of the category&apos;s 814,184 domains between them. Below Debian the category empties out fast: the thirteen technologies ranked fourth to sixteenth hold 64,774 domains in total, so Debian on its own is just over twice everything beneath it combined, based on our monthly crawl at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/delacon-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Delacon? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Delacon the most? Australia accounts for 872 of the 1,637 enriched companies with a country on file, or 53.2%, followed by New Zealand at 498 and Singapore at 117. That&apos;s the most genuinely multi-country distribution of any vendor in our Call Tracking category. Compare WildJar at 89.4% Australian or Invoca at 98.6% American, and Delacon looks like the only regional platform actually operating across borders, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/delacon-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Delacon the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Construction leads at 9.6%, followed by Retail (6.4%) and Medical Practices (5.36%). What stands out is how flat that distribution is: no vertical clears 10%, which makes Delacon the most horizontal platform in our Call Tracking category. Where Invoca puts 44.82% in one industry and Patient Prism 65.86%, Delacon sells across the whole economy of its region, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/delacon-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Delacon Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Delacon? Small by count, but with a real enterprise tier. 58% have ten or fewer employees and 82.5% have 50 or fewer, based on our analysis of 1,500 companies with employee data on file. The number that separates Delacon from its regional rival is at the top: 2.01% exceed 1,000 staff against WildJar&apos;s 0.9%, and those accounts include Medibank, Bank of Queensland, Vocus and Flight Centre.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/delacon-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Delacon Market Share Among Call Tracking</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Delacon&apos;s market share? Delacon holds a 1.37% share of the global Call Tracking market and ranks #12 of the 43 platforms we track. Global share is the wrong lens for this vendor. Delacon detects on 872 Australian companies and 498 in New Zealand, where it runs closer to WildJar than the global gap suggests, and it holds the strongest Singapore position in the category, based on our monthly crawl of 29.9M active domains at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/delacon-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Delacon Usage Statistics 2012-2026: 2,309 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Delacon appeared in our detection history in November 2012 and its curve has a genuine setback in it, which is rare in this category. It climbed to 123 domains by January 2018, then fell to 73 by January 2020, a 40% decline across two years. Recovery was strong: 528 by 2022 and 722 by 2024. Note the break in the chart, where our long-run history through July 2025 joins our current crawl from June 2026. The step across that gap is coverage widening rather than adoption.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/demandbase-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Demandbase? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Demandbase the most? The United States leads with 2,807 matched companies (42.52%), but the United Kingdom sits close behind at 2,408 (36.48%), which is a striking position for a San Francisco vendor. We checked the shared script hosts behind those UK domains for a single platform or agency pushing the tag out, and found none, only Demandbase&apos;s own hosts, so the concentration is genuine. Canada is a distant third at 280. Britain is also Lead Forensics&apos; home market, which makes it the most contested ground for account identification we measure.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/demandbase-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Demandbase the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development is the largest industry at 10.06% and IT Services and IT Consulting is second at 7.66%, so B2B technology accounts for 17.72% of the base: software companies buying account identification to sell to other software companies. Third place is the interesting one. Machinery Manufacturing takes 4.77% and Construction 4.3%, long-cycle industrial sales where one identified account can pay for the subscription, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/demandbase-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Demandbase Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Demandbase only for large companies? No, and the table says close to the opposite. 36.01% of matched companies employ 11 to 50 people, 24.98% employ 51 to 200, and 81.3% of the 6,582 companies with a headcount on record employ 200 or fewer, from our analysis of 6,760 enriched companies. Only 465 companies, 7.06%, have more than 1,000 staff. The enterprise names are real but mostly divisional: IBM&apos;s tag sits on bob.ibm.com and Honeywell&apos;s on automation.honeywell.com.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/demandbase-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Demandbase Market Share Among Website Personalization</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Demandbase&apos;s market share? Demandbase holds 4.68% of the Website Personalization market and ranks 6th of 190 technologies with live detections, based on our crawl at TechnologyChecker.io. That rank is shelving, not competition. The five rows above it are Zoho PageSense (17,929 domains), Rebuy (14,531), Bold Commerce (13,286), Adobe Target (11,661) and Piano (10,835), all ecommerce or consumer personalisation apps, and Demandbase is an account-based marketing product that never meets a Shopify upsell app in a deal. Its real peer set shows up in the stack data instead: Lead Forensics on 13.33% of its domains and ZoomInfo on 11.17%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/depop-vinted-uk-downloads-2021-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Depop vs Vinted UK Downloads 2021-2024: Vinted Doubled, Then Dipped</image:title>
      <image:caption>Vinted doubled from 4.58 million UK downloads in 2021 to 9.20 million in 2023, then dipped to 6.76 million in 2024 — still a 47% increase over its 2021 baseline. Depop has plateaued at roughly 1 million UK downloads per year. Vinted reached approximately £15 million in profit in 2023 and now dominates UK secondhand shopping.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/developer-ai-tool-challenges-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Developer Challenges With AI Tools 2024: 66% Don&apos;t Trust the Output</image:title>
      <image:caption>66.1 percent of developers don&apos;t trust AI tool output. 64.6 percent say AI lacks context of their codebase and company knowledge. 31.9 percent cite missing security policies, 29.6 percent cite insufficient training, and 25.9 percent say not everyone on the team uses AI tools. The gap between &apos;AI wrote this code&apos; and &apos;I can ship this code&apos; is context and trust — not model capability.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/developer-ai-uses-currently-using-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Developer AI Use Cases 2024: 82% Write Code With AI</image:title>
      <image:caption>82 percent of developers use AI for writing code, 67.5 percent for searching for answers, and 56.7 percent for debugging. Usage drops sharply for verification tasks: only 13.2 percent use AI for committing and reviewing code, 5.3 percent for predictive analytics, and 4.5 percent for deployment and monitoring. AI has won the authoring phase of the workflow; it has not yet won the phases where trust matters most.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dialogflow-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Dialogflow? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Dialogflow the most? Brazil leads with 36.7% of all customers, an unusually strong concentration for a Google Cloud product. The United States follows at 16.8%, with India (5.9%) and Spain (5.6%) rounding out the top four. Latin American markets (Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, Chile) combine for over 40% of the user base, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dialogflow-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Dialogflow the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use Dialogflow the most? Real Estate dominates at 23.7%, followed by Software Development (7.1%) and Leasing Non-residential Real Estate (6.1%). The concentration in property-related sectors is unusual for a chatbot platform. No single vertical normally exceeds 25%, suggesting Dialogflow has found product-market fit in lead qualification and property inquiry automation for real estate firms, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dialogflow-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Dialogflow Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Dialogflow only for small businesses? Yes, and that&apos;s a defining characteristic. With 53.8% of customers having 1-10 employees based on our analysis of 899 enriched companies, Dialogflow attracts micro-businesses and independent developers far more than enterprise teams. Only 3.2% of customers are in the 10,001+ employee range, suggesting Google&apos;s enterprise offerings (CCAI Platform, Conversational Agents) have cannibalized Dialogflow CX adoption at scale.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dialogflow-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Dialogflow Market Share Among Live Chat &amp; Messaging</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Dialogflow&apos;s market share? Dialogflow holds a 2.86% share of the chatbots market, ranking #7 in the category behind Smooch (21.74%) and Say what (14.23%). Despite being a Google Cloud product, Dialogflow occupies a niche position in a fragmented market, based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/digital-ad-budget-net-change-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Where Marketers Are Moving 2026 Ad Budgets: CTV Leads at +82% Net</image:title>
      <image:caption>During a survey among marketers worldwide published at the end of 2025, a net percentage of 82 percent of respondents anticipated a rise in connected TV (CTV) advertising budgets for 2026. Retail media and digital video followed, with net shares of 78 and 68 percent respectively. The only ad channel with a negative net share was digital display, at -18 percent.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/digitalocean-spaces-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use DigitalOcean Spaces? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 6,434 of the 19,675 matched companies, 32.7%, and the United Kingdom is second on 1,679 (8.53%). The interesting rows are next: Brazil at 1,061 (5.39%) and India at 917 (4.66%) both sit above Canada (3.73%), the Netherlands (3.72%) and Germany (3.72%), with France ninth at 1.98%. Enterprise software rarely orders that way. The four large English-speaking markets together reach 47.14%, which leaves most of this base outside them.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/digitalocean-spaces-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use DigitalOcean Spaces the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>No sector reaches 5.2%. Retail leads at 5.16% and Real Estate follows at 4.4%, with the six largest sectors together accounting for just 22.91% of the 17,151 matched companies that carry an industry. Merge the three technology labels and the ranking changes: Software Development (3.81%), Technology, Information and Internet (3.45%) and IT Services and IT Consulting (3.34%) come to 10.61%, which makes technology the real leading vertical by a wide margin.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/digitalocean-spaces-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>DigitalOcean Spaces Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>60.43% of the matched companies employ 10 people or fewer and 25.35% employ 11 to 50, so 85.78% of this base sits under 50 staff. Only 225 companies, 1.24%, employ more than 1,000. That is what a self-serve storage bucket looks like from the outside: the buyer is one developer or a small team, and there is no procurement step to survive. Percentages run over the 18,182 matched companies with a recorded size band.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/digitalocean-spaces-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>DigitalOcean Spaces Market Share Among Cloud Infrastructure</image:title>
      <image:caption>DigitalOcean Spaces holds 5.44% of Cloud Infrastructure and ranks second of 19, on 41,623 domains. Amazon S3 takes 86.13% on 659,040, so the top two are 91.56% of everything we detect in this category and the gap between first and second is 15.8 to 1. Read the table as a ranking, not a ratio: object storage is usually bought as part of a cloud account rather than chosen on its own, and each product here is identified by a signal of different strictness.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/discourse-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Discourse? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Discourse the most? The United States leads with 835 companies, 39% of the enriched base, followed by the United Kingdom (163), Germany (122), France (102) and Canada (71). The tail is genuinely international for a technical product — India (58), the Netherlands (56), Australia (52), China (44) and Brazil (36) all register. Open-source software with no licence cost distributes by developer population rather than by sales coverage, and the spread here reflects that.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/discourse-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Discourse the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 27.88% — the single highest industry concentration in our entire refresh programme, and more than two and a half times the second entry. Adding Technology, Information and Internet (9.87%) and IT Services (7.51%), technology verticals reach roughly 45% of matched companies. Discourse is what a software project reaches for when it needs a place for users to talk, and the industry table is essentially a portrait of that use case. Financial Services (3.34%), Non-profit Organizations (2.41%), E-Learning Providers (1.77%) and Computer Games (1.62%) make up a modest non-technical tail.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/discourse-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Discourse Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Discourse? 46.83% of matched companies have 1-10 employees and 29.74% have 11-50, so roughly 76.6% sit under 50 people, based on 2,140 enriched companies. The enterprise tail is small but present: 4.92% at 201-500, 1.91% at 1,001-5,000 and 0.43% above 10,000. Discourse is free to self-host, which removes any pricing gate, and the enrichment rate of 56.9% reflects a base that is part company and part open-source project or hobbyist community.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/discourse-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Discourse Market Share Among Community &amp; Comments</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Discourse&apos;s market share? Discourse holds 1.33% of the Community &amp; Comments category on 3,760 domains, ranking #5 of 63. Livefyre (227,094 domains, 80.11%) nominally leads this category, but Adobe discontinued the service in 2017 — those detections are abandoned script tags in unmaintained templates. Among products still operating, the order is Disqus (13,033), XenForo (7,881), phpBB (6,550) and then Discourse. Those comparisons cross product types, though: Disqus is a comment widget bolted onto an existing page, while Discourse is a standalone community platform with its own database, accounts and moderation. Among modern self-hosted forum software, Discourse leads.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/disqus-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Disqus? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Disqus the most? The United States leads with 1,985 companies, 39.2% of the enriched base, followed by the United Kingdom (365), Brazil (311), Canada (201) and Australia (167). Brazil&apos;s third place reflects Disqus&apos;s long-standing popularity with Portuguese-language publishers and tech blogs. Europe is thin and evenly spread: Italy (132), Poland (125), Spain (100), Germany (87) and France (82), with none reaching 3% of the base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/disqus-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Disqus the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Disqus&apos;s industry mix has shifted toward media. Advertising Services leads at 4.94%, followed by Technology, Information and Internet (4.76%) and IT Services (3.77%). The more meaningful figure is the publishing cluster: Online Audio and Video Media (3.25%), Media Production (3.23%), Book and Periodical Publishing (3.18%) and Entertainment Providers (2.61%) together reach 12.27%, which would lead the table by a factor of two if counted as one sector. That is Disqus&apos;s blog-and-publisher DNA showing clearly.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/disqus-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Disqus Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Disqus only for small websites? Overwhelmingly, yes. 74.45% of identifiable Disqus customers have 1-10 employees and another 18.99% have 11-50, so 93.4% sit under 50 people, based on 5,062 enriched companies. This is a tool for independent publishers and personal blogs. Organisations with 10,001+ employees account for 0.23% (11 companies), and where they appear — NVIDIA, the State of Michigan — it is on a documentation portal or corporate blog rather than a primary homepage.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/disqus-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Disqus Market Share Among Community &amp; Comments</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Disqus&apos;s market share? Disqus holds a 4.6% share of the Community &amp; Comments category on 13,033 detected domains, ranking #2 of 63 tracked technologies. The product above it needs explaining: Livefyre sits at 227,094 domains (80.11%), and Adobe discontinued Livefyre in 2017. Those detections are dead script tags left in templates nobody has touched in nine years, not a competing service. Measured against products that still exist, Disqus leads the category outright, and by a wide margin over XenForo (7,881) and phpBB (6,550).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/divi-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Divi Wordpress Theme? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Divi the most? The United States leads with 161,328 companies (29.4%), but Europe is the real story. Germany (46,303), the United Kingdom (44,702), France (36,483), Spain (31,704) and the Netherlands (27,989) each exceed Canada (21,898), and European countries together account for over 41% of Divi&apos;s enriched base. Divi&apos;s long-running meetup community across Europe and its early multilingual support are the usual explanations. South Africa (9,003) is an unusually strong showing for a market that rarely reaches this table.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/divi-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Divi Wordpress Theme the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Construction leads at 5.73%, followed by Business Consulting and Services (3.97%) and Advertising Services (3.24%). No single industry exceeds 6%, confirming Divi as a horizontal tool that suits almost any small-business vertical. The shape of the tail is the interesting part: Medical Practices (2.91%), Individual and Family Services (2.54%), Real Estate (2.40%), Professional Training and Coaching (2.23%) and Wellness and Fitness Services (1.98%) are all local, service-based, appointment-driven businesses. Divi&apos;s customer is a company whose website is a brochure and a booking form, not a product.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/divi-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Divi Wordpress Theme Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Divi only for small businesses? Overwhelmingly, yes. 70.88% of Divi customers have 1-10 employees and another 20.74% have 11-50, so 91.6% are micro-to-small businesses, based on 548,324 enriched companies. That is one of the most concentrated size distributions in our index. Enterprise names like Starbucks, Mercedes-Benz and Adobe do appear, but at 0.07% with 10,001+ employees and almost always on subdomain microsites, alumni portals or recruitment pages rather than primary corporate properties.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/django-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Django? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Django has the most evenly distributed geography of any framework we publish. The United States accounts for just 20.59% of matched companies (2,967), followed by Germany at 7.58% (1,092), India at 6.22% (896), Brazil at 5.64% (813) and the United Kingdom at 5.43% (783). No single market dominates, which is unusual and reflects Python&apos;s reach in education and engineering worldwide.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/django-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Django the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 6.77%, followed by IT Services and IT Consulting (5.85%), Technology, Information and Internet (4.78%), Real Estate (3.12%) and Retail (2.71%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/django-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Django Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Django has a broader size profile than most open-source frameworks. Companies of 1 to 10 employees are 52.99% of matched customers, but 11 to 50 takes 25.69% and 51 to 200 a further 12.12%. Organisations above 1,000 employees account for 2.83%, roughly double what SvelteKit shows, consistent with a framework used for business systems rather than marketing sites.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/django-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Django Market Share Among Web Frameworks</image:title>
      <image:caption>Django holds 1.45% of the Web Frameworks category and ranks 11th of 34 tracked technologies. Two things depress that figure. Microsoft ASP.NET holds 46.19% on a two-decade installed base, and Django is used heavily for internal tools, APIs and admin systems that never face a public crawler, so the web-visible count captures only part of its deployment.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dns-aaaa-query-share-monthly-2025-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>IPv6 DNS Lookups 2025-2026: AAAA Queries Grow From 16.8% to 21%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Monthly share of queries to Cloudflare&apos;s 1.1.1.1 resolver that asked for an IPv6 (AAAA) address. The share rose from 16.8% in January 2025 to 18.4% by September 2025 and ran between 20.1% and 22.1% through 2026, while IPv6 transport to the resolver stayed near 9%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dns-ipv6-transport-by-country-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>IPv6 DNS Traffic by Country 2026: Canada 18%, Russia Under 1%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Share of queries to Cloudflare&apos;s 1.1.1.1 resolver that arrived over IPv6 transport, by client country, for 27 August to 23 September 2026. Canada (18.0%), Mexico (16.4%) and the United States (14.2%) led; Singapore (0.3%) and Russia (0.5%) were lowest, against 9.0% globally.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dns-nameserver-market-share-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>DNS Hosting Market Share 2026: Cloudflare 15.4%, GoDaddy 14.2%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Authoritative DNS hosting share among live business domains, measured by TechnologyChecker from NS record lookups on a random sample of 2,423 resolving domains on 23 September 2026. Cloudflare answered for 15.4% and GoDaddy for 14.2%; no other operator passed 4%, and the four big cloud DNS products (Google Cloud DNS, Route 53, NS1, Azure DNS) totalled 7.6%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dns-nxdomain-rate-by-country-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>NXDOMAIN Rate by Country 2026: Ukraine 49.9%, Singapore 4.2%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Share of DNS responses from Cloudflare&apos;s 1.1.1.1 resolver that returned NXDOMAIN (name does not exist), by client country, for 27 August to 23 September 2026. Ukraine (49.9%) and Argentina (45.5%) were far above the 14.5% global rate; Singapore (4.2%) and China (5.2%) were lowest.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dns-nxdomain-servfail-rate-weekly-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>DNS Failure Rates 2026: NXDOMAIN Spiked to 18% of 1.1.1.1 Responses</image:title>
      <image:caption>Weekly share of DNS responses from Cloudflare&apos;s 1.1.1.1 resolver that returned NXDOMAIN (name does not exist) or SERVFAIL (resolver could not get an answer), June to mid-September 2026. NXDOMAIN sat near 10 to 11% until late July, jumped to 18.0% in the week of 10 August, stayed around 16% through August and eased to 11.8% by the week of 14 September. SERVFAIL stayed near 2 to 3% throughout.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dns-query-types-share-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>DNS Query Types 2026: A Records 65%, AAAA 21% of 1.1.1.1 Lookups</image:title>
      <image:caption>Distribution of DNS queries to Cloudflare&apos;s 1.1.1.1 resolver by record type. A (IPv4 address) lookups made up 65.0% and AAAA (IPv6 address) lookups 20.9% in the 2026 window, both up on 2025, while HTTPS record queries fell from 8.5% to 7.1%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/docker-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Docker? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Docker the most? The United States holds 1,865 of the 3,449 companies we could place, 54.07%, ahead of the United Kingdom on 297 (8.61%) and Germany on 241 (6.99%). Canada (136, 3.94%) and Australia (129, 3.74%) complete a top five covering 2,668 companies, 77.36%. It thins quickly after that: Netherlands 67 (1.94%), Switzerland 66 (1.91%), Sweden and Norway 46 each (1.33%), India 41 (1.19%), Japan 38 (1.1%), Finland 37 (1.07%), France 36 (1.04%), Belgium 34 (0.99%) and Denmark 33 (0.96%). The fifteen countries listed cover 3,112 companies, 90.23%. Two readings are worth separating. The four Nordic countries together are 162 companies, 4.70%, more than France and Japan combined, which is the usual shape for a paid developer tool. And India at 1.19% is a caution rather than a conclusion: Infosys is third on the named list here, but a verified domain belongs to a headquarters, and it says nothing about where the engineers using the account sit.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/docker-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Docker the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 20.21% of the 3,419 companies with a recorded industry, 691 companies, twice IT Services and IT Consulting in second on 349, 10.21%. Financial Services is close behind on 337, 9.86%. Grouping the labels that describe the same buyer makes the concentration clearer: software development, IT services, technology and internet, computer and network security and computer games come to 1,299 companies, 37.99%. Financial services and insurance together are 479, 14.01%. The twelve labels shown cover 2,105 companies, 61.57%, so close to four in ten of the matched base sit outside them, spread across dozens of other industries. This is a technology-weighted distribution with a heavy regulated-industry second tier, which is what a paid engineering tool looks like when it is bought centrally rather than expensed by a team.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/docker-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Docker Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Docker? The distribution peaks in the middle rather than at either end. 773 of the 3,458 companies that report a headcount, 22.35%, employ 1,001 to 5,000 people, the largest single band, with 51-200 (548, 15.85%) and 201-500 (547, 15.82%) effectively tied behind it. Above 1,000 employees the total is 1,445 companies, 41.79%, of which the 10,001+ band is 443, 12.81%. At the small end, 981 companies, 28.37%, employ 200 or fewer and 433, 12.52%, employ 50 or fewer. Counted on domains instead of companies, 393 of the 3,788, 10.37%, belong to organisations with 8,000 or more employees. One detail shapes the whole curve: verifying a domain is a paid organisation feature, so a solo developer or a ten-person team on free accounts never appears here. The thin small end is a property of the marker, not evidence that small companies do not run containers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/docker-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Docker Market Share Among Cloud Infrastructure</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Docker&apos;s market share? Docker holds 0.5% of Cloud Infrastructure and ranks 6th in that category, on 3,788 domains. Before using that number, look at what sits above it. Amazon S3 leads on 659,040 domains and 86.13%, then DigitalOcean Spaces on 41,623 (5.44%), Google Cloud Storage on 26,268 (3.43%), Alibaba Cloud on 18,768 (2.45%) and Alibaba Cloud Object Storage on 11,150 (1.46%). Every one of those is object storage, and every one is found by reading asset URLs out of a page we crawled, so a site that serves a single image from a bucket counts. Docker is found by resolving a DNS record that only a paying organisation publishes. Those two surfaces produce numbers that mean different things, and the ratio between them is a share of detected domains, not a share of infrastructure spending, workloads or containers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/docusign-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use DocuSign? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 18,268 matched companies, or 54.4% of those with a known country. The United Kingdom (2,532), Germany (1,954), Australia (1,429) and Canada (1,427) follow. That distribution tracks where binding e-signature has clear statutory footing: ESIGN and UETA in the United States, eIDAS across the UK and EU.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/docusign-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use DocuSign the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Financial Services leads at 9.78%, followed by Software Development (5.61%), Real Estate (4.44%), Hospitals and Health Care (3.90%) and IT Services and IT Consulting (3.82%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/docusign-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>DocuSign Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>The distribution peaks in the mid-market rather than at either extreme. Companies of 51 to 200 employees are the largest single bucket at 23.58%, with 201 to 500 next at 15.90%. Organisations of 1,001 or more employees make up 21.71% of matched customers. Only 13.10% sit in the 1 to 10 bracket, a much thinner small-business tail than most horizontal SaaS shows.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/docusign-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>DocuSign Market Share Among Productivity &amp; Collaboration</image:title>
      <image:caption>DocuSign holds 10.12% of the Productivity &amp; Collaboration category and ranks 3rd of 43 tracked technologies. Category share here compares tools that solve different jobs, since video meetings, whiteboards, work management and e-signature all sit in the same bucket. Read the rank as reach across corporate web properties, not as a head-to-head win rate against any single competitor.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/domain-dns-security-records-adoption-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>DNS Security Records 2026: 68.5% Publish SPF, 13.9% Enforce DMARC</image:title>
      <image:caption>Adoption of DNS-published security records among live business domains, measured by TechnologyChecker on a random sample of 2,423 resolving domains on 23 September 2026. 68.5% publish SPF and 39.3% publish DMARC, but only 13.9% enforce DMARC with quarantine or reject. 8.3% are DNSSEC-signed and 3.7% publish a CAA record.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/donorbox-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Donorbox? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States dominates with 3,113 of the companies we can place, nine times the United Kingdom in second (337), then Canada (129), Australia (99) and the Netherlands (95). US nonprofit fundraising is a much larger and more instrumented market than any other, and this distribution is close to a direct read of that.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/donorbox-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Donorbox the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Non-profit Organizations at 31.74%, then Civic and Social Organizations 6.48%, Non-profit Organization Management 4.7% and Religious Institutions 3.13%. Close to 46% of the base is explicitly nonprofit, the sharpest industry concentration anywhere in this category.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/donorbox-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Donorbox Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>75.32% of the organisations we can size have 10 employees or fewer and 18.41% have 11 to 50. Small charities, congregations and community groups. It is worth noting the contrast with the creator platforms in this category, which sit at 88% to 92% in the smallest band: Donorbox&apos;s base is small, but it is made of organisations rather than individuals.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/donorbox-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Donorbox Market Share Among Donations &amp; Fundraising</image:title>
      <image:caption>Donorbox is third in Donations &amp; Fundraising at 5.84%, behind GiveWP (31,478 domains) and Patreon (21,307). Only one of those two is a competitor. GiveWP is a WordPress donation plugin serving the same nonprofits; Patreon is a creator membership platform whose users barely overlap with Donorbox&apos;s at all. We state the rank without a total because our category listing pages at 50 rows.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dram-manufacturer-market-share-q4-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>DRAM Manufacturer Market Share Q4 2025: Samsung 36%, SK Hynix 32.1%, Micron 22.4%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Three companies control 90.5 percent of global DRAM supply as of Q4 2025: Samsung at 36 percent, SK Hynix at 32.1 percent, and Micron at 22.4 percent. Supply concentration at that level turns AI hardware availability into a geopolitical risk — if any of the three stumble, the AI accelerator market faces a capacity crunch.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dram-market-revenue-annual-2015-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Annual DRAM Market Revenue 2015-2025: $45B to ~$140B (Record Year)</image:title>
      <image:caption>The annual DRAM revenue curve tracks the broader memory cycle: peaks in 2017-2018 during the cloud-buildout, a 2019-2020 trough, a 2021 cloud refresh, a 2022-2023 crypto-and-PC correction, and then a sharp 2024-2025 surge driven by high-bandwidth memory demand for AI accelerators. Q4 2025 alone posted $53.58 billion in revenue — pushing the annual total to a record.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/drift-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Drift? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Drift the most? The United States leads with 60.49% of enriched customers, one of the most concentrated distributions in the category. The United Kingdom (6.61%), Canada (5.38%), India (3.91%) and Australia (3.84%) follow. That skew is what you would expect from a product sold through a US-centric account-based marketing motion, and it means European and Asian coverage was always thin.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/drift-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Drift the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 11.3%, followed by Construction (9.23%) and IT Services and IT Consulting (7.04%). Construction ranking second is an artifact rather than a finding, and it is worth understanding before you filter on it. 403 of those 481 Construction domains are flooring and carpet dealers running a shared agency template whose Drift snippet no longer loads. Screen them out and the profile is a straightforward business-to-business technology mix.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/drift-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Drift Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Drift only for large enterprises? No. 55.12% of enriched Drift companies have fewer than 10 employees and 80.8% have fewer than 50, which sits oddly against Drift&apos;s reputation as an enterprise product. Two things explain it. Drift ran a free tier for years, and a large share of the small-company tail carries an installed snippet that no longer loads. The enterprise core is real but small: 4.23% of enriched companies have more than 1,000 staff.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/drift-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Drift Market Share Among Live Chat &amp; Messaging</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Drift&apos;s market share? Drift holds a 0.27% share of Live Chat &amp; Messaging, ranking #25. The technologies above it are mostly a different kind of product: WhatsApp Business Chat (34.91%), Tawk.to (6.31%) and Joinchat (5.79%) are free or low-cost widgets that install on any small business site. Drift was priced and sold for business-to-business revenue teams, so its rank understates its standing among the buyers it actually competed for.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/drift-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Drift Usage Statistics 2016-2026: 7.9K Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Our records place Drift on 7,899 active domains in August 2026, up from 7,338 in June. Counts are not a like-for-like series over time: the set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly discovered ones added, and our detection signals widen over time. Read the long-run shape as a trend rather than a same-domain comparison. The rise from 2016 to the early 2020s tracks Drift&apos;s real commercial run; the recent months reflect wider coverage on our side rather than a product that is winning new customers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/drip-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Drip? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Drip the most? The United States dominates with 53.4% of enriched Drip customers, followed by the United Kingdom (7.9%) and Canada (6.4%). Australia rounds out the top four at 5.8%, and Denmark is a notable fifth at 4.6%, well above its usual share on any platform in this category. Together, English-speaking countries account for 73.5% of the user base, consistent with Drip&apos;s English-only product and content marketing strategy. Percentages are shares of the 2,604 Drip domains where we have a company country on file.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/drip-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Drip the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Advertising Services leads at 6.47%, followed by Retail (4.69%) and Software Development (4.31%). The long tail is significant: no single industry exceeds 7%. Drip positions itself as an ecommerce tool, and retail now sits second, but the mix around it (advertising, software, professional training at 3.94%, wellness at 3.61%) shows the platform appeals just as much to knowledge-commerce and service businesses as to traditional online retail.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/drip-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Drip Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Drip only for small businesses? Overwhelmingly, yes. With 67.3% of Drip customers having 1-10 employees based on our analysis of 2,732 enriched companies, and 91.2% under 50, this is one of the most micro-business-concentrated platforms we track. Only 2.3% of Drip customers have more than 200 employees, and none of the fifty largest domains we detect has more than 10,000. The occasional institutional detection, like Children&apos;s Wisconsin or Loras College, appears on an isolated subdomain rather than as a company-wide deployment.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/drip-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Drip Market Share Among Email Marketing</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Drip&apos;s market share? Drip holds a 0.2% share of the Email Marketing market, ranking #21 of 65 tracked platforms, based on our monthly crawl of 28.2M domains and 7,900+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. That places it well behind category leaders like MailChimp (21.24%) and Klaviyo (16.78%), but ahead of GetResponse. Drip occupies a niche position focused on ecommerce-specific automation rather than broad marketing suites.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dropbox-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Dropbox? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries carry the most Dropbox verification records? Among the 7,023 matched companies the United States leads with 4,188 — more than six times the United Kingdom (636) — followed by Australia (410), Canada (254) and Germany (163). The Nordics are collectively larger than they look: Sweden (106), Denmark (81) and Norway (72) together sit ahead of Canada. Japan (49) is the only Asian market in the top fifteen, which for a consumer-familiar brand is a thin showing — and probably says more about who performs DNS-level domain verification than about where the product is used.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dropbox-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Dropbox the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries carry this record? Nothing dominates. Software Development leads at 5.56%, then Advertising Services (4.84%), IT Services and IT Consulting (4.67%), Construction (4.53%) and Financial Services (4.02%). The tenth line is still at 1.93%. A flat industry curve is the expected shape here. The rule does not ask what a company does; it asks whether somebody once proved control of a domain to Dropbox, and any organisation with a website can have done that. Treat the ordering as close to noise unless a line sits far off the pack — none of these does.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dropbox-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Dropbox Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is this a small-business signal or an enterprise one? Both, and it clusters in the middle: 25.17% have 11-50 employees and 24.27% have 51-200, with 19.65% at 1-10. The 10,001+ bracket is 1.77%. Hold that against the names on this page — AMD, Netflix, the BBC, Yale. Both readings are true and neither contradicts the other: the size table describes the whole matched population, which is mostly ordinary small and mid-sized organisations that verified a domain once, while the recognisable names are the tail a reader happens to recognise. Nothing in a DNS record tells you how many people at any of them use Dropbox.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dropbox-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Dropbox Market Share Among Digital Asset Management</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Dropbox&apos;s market share here? 7.07% of the domains we detect carrying a Digital Asset Management signal, which ranks it #6 in that category. Read the denominator carefully. It is a share of detected domains inside one of our detection categories — not a share of cloud-storage seats, users or revenue, and not comparable with a market-sizing report. It also mixes mechanisms: this row is a DNS record, while several rows beneath it are image-delivery hosts read from page markup. A percentage computed across signals that different is a ranking of detections, not of products.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/drupal-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Drupal? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Drupal the most? The United States leads with 27.3% of companies whose country we know (26,964), followed by Germany at 8.0% (7,856), France at 7.7% (7,602) and, strikingly, Belgium at 7.2% (7,127). Belgium punches far above its weight here, almost certainly driven by EU institutions and government bodies in Brussels; no other platform in this category shows Belgium anywhere near its top ten. Europe accounts for 52.8% of the Drupal base against 41.0% for English-speaking markets, making Drupal the second-most European platform in this category after Joomla.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/drupal-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Drupal the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Drupal&apos;s industry distribution reveals its strength in the public and institutional sectors. Government Administration leads at 4.09% of all customers, the only platform in this category where government is the #1 vertical, followed by Construction (3.54%), Non-profit Organizations at 3.17%, IT Services and IT Consulting (2.98%), Financial Services (2.98%) and Hospitals and Health Care (2.74%). The age data reinforces the picture: 14.61% of Drupal organisations were founded before 1960, the oldest institutional base of any platform we track here.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/drupal-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Drupal Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Drupal only for enterprise? No, but it is by far the most enterprise-weighted platform in this category. 50.01% of Drupal sites we can size have 1–10 employees, the lowest micro-business share of any platform here, where the builders run 76–82%, and 27.44% have more than fifty. The tail is what stands out: 1.41% employ 10,001+ people, more than thirty times the rate on Wix (0.04%) or Squarespace (0.03%), and 9.45% sit in the 501-and-above brackets. Of the fifty largest organisations we detect on Drupal, 42 are at 10,001+ employees, including Siemens, PepsiCo, Reliance Industries, DHL, Dell, Orange and the US Department of Veterans Affairs.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/drupal-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Drupal Market Share Among CMS &amp; Website Builders</image:title>
      <image:caption>Drupal holds 1.07% of the CMS and website-builder market in TechnologyChecker.io&apos;s dataset, ranking #8 with 158,947 detected domains. WordPress (64.17%), Wix (8.72%) and Squarespace (6.84%) lead the category. Drupal&apos;s position reflects a specialised, enterprise- and government-focused fit rather than a mass-market one, and raw share understates it, because Drupal&apos;s average deployment is far larger than a builder&apos;s. Its closest open-source peer, Joomla (1.5%), remains slightly ahead by domain count but is losing on every migration corridor while Drupal is not.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/duda-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Duda? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Duda the most? The United States leads with 48.8% of companies whose country we know (78,790), followed by Germany at 11.3% (18,175) and the United Kingdom at 8.4% (13,482). Australia, Italy and Spain round out the top six. English-speaking markets (US, UK, Australia, Canada) account for 64.5% of Duda&apos;s base, reflecting an English-first go-to-market and strong US agency partnerships, while Europe contributes 38.2% overall. Germany&apos;s second-place finish is the standout, and unusual for a US-founded builder.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/duda-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Duda the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Construction is the top industry at 11.35%, nearly double the second-place slot and the highest single-industry concentration of any platform in this category, by a wide margin. Individual and Family Services (6.26%), Medical Practices (4.10%), Real Estate (4.02%), Retail (3.95%) and Business Consulting (3.15%) follow. Where every other builder here tops out around 5%, Duda&apos;s construction share is more than double that, which tells you exactly which agencies are reselling it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/duda-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Duda Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Duda only for small businesses? Almost entirely. 76.45% of Duda sites we can size have 10 or fewer employees, with another 19.51% at 11–50, 95.96% of the base under fifty people, based on 164,361 enriched companies. Only 42 organisations exceed 10,001 employees, among them Toll Group, Gannett and Sutherland Global, and each of those runs Duda on a careers or investor subdomain rather than a primary site. This concentration is by design: Duda was built for agencies serving small businesses, not for enterprises buying directly.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/duda-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Duda Market Share Among CMS &amp; Website Builders</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Duda&apos;s market share? Duda holds a 1.45% share of the CMS and website-builder market, ranking #7 behind WordPress (64.17%), Wix (8.72%), Squarespace (6.84%), GoDaddy Website Builder (3.67%), Webflow (1.75%) and Joomla (1.5%). The raw domain count understates Duda&apos;s commercial position, though: each Duda agency account typically manages dozens or hundreds of client sites, so revenue per account is far higher than a consumer builder&apos;s. Based on our monthly crawl of 28M+ domains.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/duo-security-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Cisco Duo? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 70.47% of Duo organizations we can place, ahead of Canada at 4.86% and the United Kingdom at 3.69%. Germany follows at 2.91% and the Netherlands at 2.50%. That concentration is steeper than most categories we cover and it tracks where Duo sells: North American mid-market and public sector buyers, with European presence strongest in the Netherlands and the German-speaking countries. Sales teams working this list outside North America should expect roughly one in four accounts.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/duo-security-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Cisco Duo the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>No single industry dominates. IT services and consulting leads at 6.61%, then hospitals and health care at 4.96%, construction at 4.60%, financial services at 4.24% and government administration at 4.06%. What stands out is how far regulated professional services punch above their weight: law practices are 3.73% of Duo&apos;s base against 0.77% for 1Password, a peer we detect exactly the same way. Government administration shows a similar gap, 4.06% against 0.64%. Accounting runs 2.10% against 0.88%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/duo-security-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cisco Duo Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Duo&apos;s base sits in the middle of the market. Companies with 51 to 200 staff make up 27.12% and those with 11 to 50 make up 26.10%, so more than half the base is under 200 people. Organizations above 1,000 staff account for 9.73% and those above 10,000 for 1.39%. The useful comparison is 1Password, which we detect through the same kind of domain record at almost the same scale: it runs 5.17% above 1,000 staff and 0.71% above 10,000. Duo carries close to twice the enterprise weight of that peer while still selling mostly to smaller companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/duo-security-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Cisco Duo Market Share Among Identity &amp; Access (SSO/CIAM)</image:title>
      <image:caption>Cisco Duo holds 2.15% of the identity and access category and ranks 3rd of 50. That ranking needs an asterisk, because the two entries above it are consumer sign-in buttons rather than access security products: Facebook Login sits on 621,585 domains and Google Sign-in on 219,115, mostly as one-click options on public websites. Duo is the highest-placed workforce access product in the category. The closest comparison by both size and deployment style is 1Password at 20,876 domains, which we detect the same way Duo is detected, through a domain verification record.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dynatrace-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Dynatrace? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States leads with 2,826 matched companies (34.68%), but Germany is a strong second at 1,190 (14.60%), followed by the United Kingdom at 635 (7.79%). That German share is roughly triple what most US-headquartered monitoring vendors show in our data, and it reflects Dynatrace&apos;s origins and long-standing enterprise presence in the German-speaking market.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dynatrace-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Dynatrace the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Banking leads at 12.45%, with Financial Services close behind at 12.20%, then Insurance (6.49%), Retail (4.26%) and Software Development (3.41%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dynatrace-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Dynatrace Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Dynatrace has the heaviest large-enterprise weighting of the monitoring tools we track. Companies of 10,000 or more employees make up 9.96% of matched customers and the 1,001 to 5,000 bracket a further 13.22%, putting organisations above 1,000 staff at 27.21% of the base. The 1 to 10 bracket sits at 24.46%, which for an enterprise platform is largely agencies, consultancies and subsidiary domains.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/dynatrace-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Dynatrace Market Share Among APM &amp; Error Tracking</image:title>
      <image:caption>Dynatrace holds 0.55% of the APM &amp; Error Tracking category and ranks 10th of 50 tracked technologies. That number needs context: Sentry alone accounts for 71.99% of the category because free and open-source error tracking ships by default in a huge number of developer projects. Domain count measures reach, not contract value, and Dynatrace sells into far fewer, far larger accounts.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ecommerce-platforms-france-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Top E-Commerce Platforms in France 2026: PrestaShop Beats Shopify</image:title>
      <image:caption>France is the most distinctive e-commerce market in Europe. Among the merchants TechnologyChecker matches to France, Wix eCommerce (8,014) leads, but the French-built PrestaShop is right behind at 7,027 — roughly 3.6 times the 1,960 we match on Shopify. WooCommerce (5,198) ranks third. Shopify, the global category leader, sits fifth.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ecommerce-platforms-germany-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Top E-Commerce Platforms in Germany 2026: Ecwid and Wix Lead</image:title>
      <image:caption>In Germany, the e-commerce platform mix is led by lightweight SMB builders. Among the merchants TechnologyChecker matches to Germany, Ecwid (6,272) and Wix eCommerce (3,834) rank first and second, followed by WooCommerce (3,123). Shopify sits fourth (1,947) — outside the top three despite its 46% global category share.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ecommerce-platforms-italy-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Top E-Commerce Platforms in Italy 2026: WooCommerce Leads</image:title>
      <image:caption>Italy&apos;s e-commerce platform mix is led by open-source WooCommerce. Among the merchants TechnologyChecker matches to Italy, WooCommerce (4,827) ranks first, ahead of Ecwid (3,813) and Wix eCommerce (2,440). The French-built PrestaShop is fourth (1,882) and Shopify fifth (1,103) — outside the top three despite its global lead.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ecwid-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Ecwid? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Ecwid the most? The United States leads with 36.8% of companies whose country we know, followed by the United Kingdom at 10.9%, Germany at 8.3%, Canada at 6.2% and the Netherlands at 5.7%. English-speaking markets account for 61.8% of the base and Europe for 44.2%. The German and Dutch showings are stronger than the category norm and reflect Ecwid&apos;s long-standing multilingual positioning for very small merchants.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ecwid-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Ecwid the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 20.21%, followed by Retail Apparel and Fashion (3.64%), Food and Beverage Services (2.96%) and Restaurants (2.69%). The food cluster is distinctive: taken together, food service and restaurants account for over 5.6% of Ecwid&apos;s base, a higher share than on any other platform in this category. A widget that adds ordering to an existing site is a natural fit for a café or bakery, and the data reflects that directly.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ecwid-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ecwid Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Ecwid? It is the smallest-business platform in this category. 81.41% have 1-10 employees and another 15.48% have 11-50, putting 96.89% under fifty people, the highest micro-business concentration of any ecommerce platform we track. That is exactly the audience a bolt-on store widget is built for: a bakery, a studio, a small food producer that needs to take a handful of orders without rebuilding its website.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ecwid-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ecwid Market Share Among Ecommerce Platforms</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Ecwid&apos;s market share? Ecwid holds 0.15% of the ecommerce platform category, ranking #20. That is a substantial downward revision from previously published figures, for the measurement reason set out above rather than because Ecwid lost customers. In its actual niche, a widget that adds a store to a site built elsewhere, the comparison set is not Shopify or Magento but the bundled commerce modules of website builders, and there Ecwid is the independent option a site owner adds deliberately.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/efilli-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Efilli? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Efilli the most? Turkey accounts for 92.1% of enriched Efilli customers with a country on record, 492 of 534. The rest scatter thinly: the United States (7), Germany (5), then France and the United Kingdom at three each. Efilli supports GDPR and Brazil&apos;s LGPD as well as KVKK, so the concentration reflects where it sells rather than where it can operate, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/efilli-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Efilli the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Financial services is the dominant industry at 10.34%, followed by hospitality (8.1%) and retail (6.03%). No single industry clears 11%, so the tail is long, but the clustering is the real signal: add banking and insurance and finance reaches 16.4% of enriched customers, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/efilli-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Efilli Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Efilli only for large enterprises? No, but it leans that way. The largest single band is 51 to 200 employees at 20.9%, with 11 to 50 close behind at 19.5%, based on our analysis of 602 enriched companies. What separates Efilli from the self serve consent tools is the top end: 30.7% employ more than 500 people, and Türk Telekom, Migros and Şişecam all carry it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/efilli-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Efilli Market Share Among Consent &amp; Privacy Management</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Efilli&apos;s market share? Efilli holds 0.03% of the Consent &amp; Privacy Management market and ranks #69, which is the wrong lens for a vendor that sells in one country. Restrict the same data to Turkish companies and Efilli ranks #5 with 492 domains, ahead of Cookiebot (349), OneTrust (249) and Usercentrics (149), based on our monthly crawl of 29.9M active domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/efilli-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Efilli Usage Statistics 2021-2026: 986 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Efilli first appears in our records in 2021 on a handful of domains and climbs steadily through 2024. Our current crawl detects it on 986 active domains as of August 2026, up from 790 in June. Counts are not a like for like series over time: the set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly discovered ones added, and our detection signals widen as we go. The step between 2025 and 2026 reflects changes on our side, both the domains we cover and the signals we detect Efilli with, rather than a surge in adoption.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/elementor-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Elementor? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Elementor the most? The United States leads on only 19.5%, which is the lowest US concentration of any major builder we track. Brazil is second at 8.25%, then India (6.41%), Germany (6.19%), the United Kingdom (6.04%), Spain (5.01%) and France (4.93%). A free tier and heavy localisation produce a genuinely global base rather than an American one with an export tail.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/elementor-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Elementor the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Construction leads at 4.52%, ahead of Business Consulting (3.97%), IT Services (3.96%) and Advertising Services (3.54%). A construction firm at the top of a website-builder list tells you what this tool is for: local businesses that need a credible brochure site, built once by an agency or a founder, and rarely touched again.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/elementor-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Elementor Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>64.23% of Elementor sites belong to companies with ten staff or fewer and 23.7% to companies with 11 to 50, from 2,072,885 enriched companies. Only 2.52% employ more than 200. Vodafone, Kroger and 7-Eleven appear in our top 50, but they are running campaign or regional sites on it rather than their primary web estate.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/elementor-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Elementor Usage Statistics 2017-2026: 3.1M Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Elementor enters our detection history in June 2017 on 489 sites, about a year after launch, and climbs without a single meaningful pause. It passed a million sites in early 2024 and reached 1,554,208 by April 2025, the last clean month in our long-run feed. Two cautions. The decline after April 2025 is that feed narrowing its own coverage rather than sites removing the plugin, which you can see because the total domain count falls in step with the active one. And the series changes coverage between 2025 and 2026, so read the step across that gap as coverage rather than a year of growth.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/eloqua-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Oracle Eloqua? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 60.36% of enriched Eloqua companies, with the United Kingdom at 7.71%, Australia at 4.13% and Canada at 4.09%. Those four English-speaking markets cover 76% of the sample. The concentration is sharper than most enterprise software we track and reflects where Oracle&apos;s marketing salesforce has historically been strongest.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/eloqua-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Oracle Eloqua the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software development leads at 7.28%, followed by hospitals and healthcare at 6.78% and IT services at 6.15%. The more telling entries are further down: insurance, financial services, higher education and medical practices together account for a large block, and these are long sales-cycle industries where multi-step nurture programmes justify the licence cost.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/eloqua-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Oracle Eloqua Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>This chart needs a caveat before you read it. Just under half of Eloqua domains map to companies with fewer than 50 employees, which looks wrong for an enterprise platform. It is largely an artefact of how large organisations deploy Eloqua: on separate campaign domains, event microsites and sub-brand properties, each of which matches a small company record rather than the parent. A university athletics site and a single trade show both register as tiny companies. Judged against peers instead of in isolation, the enterprise signal is unambiguous: 18.39% of Eloqua companies have more than 1,000 employees and 5.50% have more than 10,000, both the highest of any web-detected tool in this category.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/eloqua-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Oracle Eloqua Market Share Among Marketing Automation</image:title>
      <image:caption>Ranking 23rd of 415 tools at 0.42% share tells you Eloqua is not a volume product, which is accurate but incomplete. HubSpot alone accounts for 47.55% of this category, and most of the tools above Eloqua sell to small businesses at price points Eloqua does not compete at. Share of domains and share of revenue are very different questions in Marketing Automation, and this table answers only the first.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/eloqua-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Oracle Eloqua Usage Statistics 2005-2026: 5,198 Domains</image:title>
      <image:caption>Eloqua is detected on 5,198 domains as of August 2026. The curve runs from a handful of domains in 2005 to roughly 2,200 by late 2024, then steps up through 2026. Two things move this line and both matter: the set of domains we crawl turns over every month as dead sites drop out and new ones come in, and our detection widened considerably during 2026. Read it as a record of how visible Eloqua became to us, not as Oracle&apos;s sales history. Eloqua launched in 1999 and Oracle acquired it in 2012, so the product long predates the start of this chart.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/emerging-cybersecurity-technologies-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Emerging Cybersecurity Technologies 2024: Automation 42%, AI &amp; Zero Trust Tied at 36%</image:title>
      <image:caption>ISC2&apos;s 2024 survey ranks cybersecurity automation as the top emerging technology at 42 percent. Advancements in AI and Zero Trust network access tie for second at 36 percent each. Post-quantum cryptography already registers at 14 percent — early, but not fringe.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/enable-co-il-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Enable.co.il? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Enable.co.il the most? Israel accounts for 88.43% of enriched companies with a country on file, the most concentrated base of any vendor in this category, with Ghana second at 5.92% and the United States third at 2.79%. Everything else rounds to noise: the United Kingdom is 0.54%, Sri Lanka 0.3% and Germany 0.24%. Read those shares as directional, since only 42.6% of our Enable.co.il detections match a company record at all.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/enable-co-il-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Enable.co.il the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Business Consulting and Services is the largest vertical at 29.89% of the ten industries we chart, nearly three times Advertising Services (11.82%). Real Estate (9.56%), Retail (8.34%), Technology, Information and Internet (8.17%) and Financial Services (8.08%) sit close together behind them. Those denominators cover the charted ten only, not the whole base, so read them as the shape of Enable.co.il&apos;s professional-services tilt rather than a census, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/enable-co-il-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Enable.co.il Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Enable.co.il built for small businesses? Almost entirely. 61.78% of enriched Enable.co.il companies employ ten people or fewer and another 25.71% fall in the 11 to 50 band, so roughly seven in eight sit under fifty staff, based on our enriched company data. Just 0.71% of the base exceeds a thousand employees, and the one detection in the 10,001+ band is Bar-Ilan University.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/enable-co-il-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Enable.co.il Market Share Among Accessibility Tools</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Enable.co.il&apos;s market share? Enable.co.il holds 1.72% of the Accessibility Tools market and ranks #7 of the 47 technologies we track in the category, far behind UserWay (35.57%) and accessiBe (21.9%). That figure reads low for the wrong reason. Enable.co.il barely sells outside Israel, so a global share number measures the size of its home market more than its standing inside it, based on our live crawl of 29.9M active domains at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/enable-co-il-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Enable.co.il Usage Statistics 2017-2026: 7,681 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Enable.co.il first appears in our long-run detection history in October 2017 on six domains and works its way up to roughly 4,300 by spring 2025. Our current crawl then counts it separately: 5,608 domains in June 2026 and 7,681 in August 2026. Keep two things apart when you read the chart. The gap between those series is our coverage widening rather than adoption, and the 1.36x move across our own three months only counts as growth once you set it beside the 1.18x our whole crawl grew in the same window, which leaves Enable.co.il at about 1.16x in real terms.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/encrypted-dns-doh-vs-dot-2025-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>DNS over HTTPS vs DNS over TLS 2026: DoH Passes 50% of Encrypted DNS</image:title>
      <image:caption>DNS over HTTPS (DoH) as a share of all encrypted DNS queries (DoH plus DNS over TLS) reaching Cloudflare&apos;s 1.1.1.1 resolver, sampled every two weeks from September 2025 to mid-September 2026. DoT carried the majority of encrypted queries for most of the year, apart from a brief spike in early November 2025; DoH moved above 50% again in September 2026 and stayed there for two straight weeks.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/encrypted-dns-share-by-country-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Encrypted DNS by Country 2026: India Leads at 28.5%, US at 8.2%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Share of DNS queries to Cloudflare&apos;s 1.1.1.1 resolver that used DNS over HTTPS or DNS over TLS, by country, for 27 August to 23 September 2026 compared with the same dates in 2025. India had the highest encrypted share at 28.5%, mostly DoT; the UK, Russia and Germany gained 5 to 6.5 points, while South Korea fell 11 points.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/encrypted-dns-share-monthly-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Encrypted DNS by Month 2026: DoH and DoT Reach 13% of 1.1.1.1 Queries</image:title>
      <image:caption>Monthly share of queries to Cloudflare&apos;s 1.1.1.1 resolver that arrived encrypted (DNS over HTTPS plus DNS over TLS) in 2026. The share held near 11.6 to 12.0% from January to May, rose to 13.3% in July and was 13.0% for 1 to 22 September, against 10.7 to 12.0% in the same months of 2025.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ensighten-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Ensighten? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Ensighten the most?The United States dominates with 94.08% of enriched customers, the narrowest geographic base of any tag manager we track and a direct reflection of Ensighten&apos;s roots as a US enterprise product sold into US insurance. Australia (1.88%) and the United Kingdom (1.81%) are distant second and third, with Canada fourth at 0.87%. Together those four countries account for more than 98% of the identifiable customer base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ensighten-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Ensighten the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use Ensighten the most?Insurance is overwhelmingly dominant at 72.5% of enriched companies, followed by Retail (4.15%) and Motor Vehicle Manufacturing (1.4%). This is not a horizontal tool, it is a vertical one, and it is the most concentrated industry distribution in our corpus. The concentration comes from carrier networks deploying Ensighten across agent websites rather than from thousands of independent insurance buyers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ensighten-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ensighten Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Ensighten?Is Ensighten only for large enterprises? The distribution says no, and the distribution is misleading. 64.66% of enriched domains belong to companies with 1-10 employees, out of 11,417 enriched companies. That is the insurance industry&apos;s structure showing through: thousands of independent agencies run tags inherited from a parent carrier network, so one enterprise purchase produces thousands of small-company domains. The 44 companies with 10,001+ employees, HP, Dell Technologies, TD Bank, Nationwide and Equifax among them, are where the buying decision actually sits.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ensighten-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ensighten Market Share Among Tag Management</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Ensighten&apos;s market share?Ensighten holds 0.19% of the tag management market by detected domains, ranking #6 of the 17 tag managers we track. The share number is close to meaningless on its own: Google Tag Manager takes 97.9% of the category, so every other vendor is competing for the remaining 2%. Ensighten operates as an enterprise-only tool with a small footprint of high-value deployments, and its customers are carriers and banks that never show up in volume counts.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ensighten-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ensighten Usage Statistics 2011-2026: 20,976 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>How has Ensighten&apos;s adoption changed over time?Ensighten first appears in our records in January 2011 on 4 domains. Adoption stayed flat through 2012, then climbed steeply into the mid-2010s alongside the platform&apos;s enterprise sales push into insurance and financial services, reaching a high of 8,506 domains in January 2018. CHEQ acquired Ensighten in August 2022 and later rebranded the product as CHEQ Control &amp; Compliance.Read the long series with one caveat: counts are not a like-for-like measure over time, because the set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly discovered ones added, and our detection signals widen over time. Within the current crawl the direction is up, from 16,907 domains in June 2026 to 20,203 in July and 20,976 in August.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/enterprise-ai-adoption-by-region-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Enterprise AI Adoption 2024: 78% Globally, 82% in North America</image:title>
      <image:caption>Organizational AI use grew from 55% in 2023 to 78% in 2024 globally — a 23-point jump in a single year. North America leads at 82%, followed by Europe (80%), Developing markets (77%), Greater China (75%), and Asia-Pacific (72%). The largest year-over-year gain came in developing markets (+28 points), likely reflecting laxer regulation and lower procurement friction.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/enterprise-software-spending-2009-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Enterprise Software Spending 2009-2026: $225B to Forecast $1.43T</image:title>
      <image:caption>Enterprise software spending grew roughly 6x between 2009 and 2026, from $225 billion to a forecast $1.43 trillion. The market nearly tripled between 2020 and 2026 alone, fueled by SaaS consolidation and then AI embedding across the application layer. Gartner forecasts 15.2% year-over-year growth in 2026 — higher than any other IT segment.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/equalweb-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use EqualWeb? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use EqualWeb the most? The United States accounts for 61.08% of enriched companies with a country on file, 3,266 of them, and Spain is second at 9.41%, or 503 companies. After that it thins out quickly: United Kingdom 3.96%, Israel 2.86%, Germany 2.77%, Canada 2.62%. The Spanish block is the outlier, and it comes with names like El Corte Ingles, Seat and Grupo Sese attached.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/equalweb-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use EqualWeb the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Medical Practices is the largest vertical at 22.18% of the top ten industries shown, ahead of Retail (13.71%) and Insurance (10.79%). Fold Hospitals and Health Care (9.24%) in with Medical Practices and health care alone takes 31.42% of that top ten, with Real Estate (9.12%) and Advertising Services (8.05%) behind it. These are regulated, appointment-driven businesses that receive accessibility demand letters, which explains the shape better than any product feature does.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/equalweb-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>EqualWeb Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use EqualWeb? Mostly small ones. 49.06% of enriched EqualWeb customers have ten or fewer employees and another 26.93% fall in the 11 to 50 band, so about 76% of the base we can size sits under 50 people. Only 0.67% run more than 10,000 staff. Sort those detections by headcount, though, and the top of the list is retail groups and hospital systems, so the enterprise footprint is real, just rare.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/equalweb-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>EqualWeb Market Share Among Accessibility Tools</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is EqualWeb&apos;s market share? EqualWeb holds 2.25% of the Accessibility Tools market and ranks #6 of the 47 technologies we track across 430,588 detected domains. That sits a long way behind UserWay (35.57%) and accessiBe (21.9%), which between them hold more than 60% of the category. One caveat on any ranking here: EqualWeb and Nagich are one vendor under two brand names, so those two rows describe a single product.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/equalweb-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>EqualWeb Usage Statistics 2020-2026: 10,022 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>EqualWeb first appears in our long-run detection history in March 2020 on a single domain, passes 1,000 in mid-2022 and reaches 3,069 by July 2025, where that series ends. Our current crawl then finds 8,323 domains in June 2026, 9,697 in July and 10,022 in August 2026. Counts either side of that step are not like-for-like, because the set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly discovered ones added, and our detection signals widen over time, so read it as wider coverage and not as EqualWeb tripling its customer base in a year.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/europe-cart-abandonment-reasons-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Why Europeans Abandon Carts in 2025: Slow Delivery Tops at 36%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Delivery and payment friction dominate cart abandonment in Europe. In a 2025 survey of 24,000 European online shoppers, slow delivery (36%) was the leading reason for abandoning a cart, narrowly ahead of a missing preferred payment method (35%), unexpected customs charges (33%), a failed discount code (33%) and paying for delivery (32%). Fixing delivery speed and payment choice addresses roughly 70% of stated abandonment.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/europe-cloud-networks-traffic-share-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Europe&apos;s Top Cloud Networks Q1 2026: Hetzner Beats AWS by 1.3 Points</image:title>
      <image:caption>Hetzner (AS24940) carries 3.79% of European internet traffic, well ahead of AWS at 2.45% and Google Cloud at 1.71%. AWS posted the fastest growth of any hyperscaler in any region at +49.9% year over year, but the gap with Hetzner is not closing. Data sovereignty and bare-metal pricing keep European workloads on local providers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/europe-data-center-power-volume-by-type-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Europe Data Center Power by Type 2025: Colocation Leads at 5,020 MW</image:title>
      <image:caption>Standard colocation data centers account for the largest share of European data center IT power in 2025 at 5,020 megawatts, roughly a third of the 14,784 MW total. Scale colocation, which leases capacity at larger volumes, adds 3,654 MW. Enterprise (in-house) facilities account for 3,101 MW and hyperscale owned sites for 3,009 MW. The split shows Europe still leans on third-party colocation rather than operator-owned hyperscale capacity.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/europe-ecommerce-payment-methods-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>How Europe Pays Online in 2025: Digital Wallets Lead at 38%</image:title>
      <image:caption>In 2025, digital wallets accounted for 38% of e-commerce transaction value in Europe — more than credit cards (19%) and debit cards (17%) individually. Account-to-account (A2A) bank transfers reached 14% and buy-now-pay-later 9%. For merchants, wallet support is now a baseline requirement rather than an add-on.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/express-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Express.js? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>United States leads global adoption of Express.js with 22,619 active deployments. The country distribution highlights where Express.js sees strongest market traction.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/express-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Express.js the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development is the industry with the highest share of Express.js adoption, at 6.5% of all customers. The distribution reflects which sectors find Express.js most useful.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/express-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Express.js Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>65.1% of Express.js customers are companies with 1-10 employees. This distribution reveals which company segments rely on Express.js most.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/express-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Express.js Market Share Among Web Frameworks</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Express.js&apos;s market share? Express.js holds 7.46% of the Web Frameworks category and ranks 4th of 89 tracked technologies, behind Microsoft ASP.NET (856,440 domains, 46.19%), Ruby on Rails (203,189, 10.96%) and Nuxt.js (190,132, 10.25%), and ahead of Laravel (90,325, 4.87%) and CodeIgniter (63,867, 3.44%). Read that ranking as approximate. Each framework in the table is found by a different kind of signal, and the differences are large enough to move positions. Microsoft ASP.NET is matched partly on URL extension, .asp and .aspx, as well as on headers and cookies, a far wider surface than any rival&apos;s. Express.js has exactly one clause, the X-Powered-By: Express header. Laravel is found by a cookie name and a JavaScript global, while Nuxt.js and Ruby on Rails each have several independent signals. Every count here is a floor, and the floors are measured with different instruments, so this is not a like-for-like market share.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/extent-of-ai-usage-marketing-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Extent of AI Use in Marketing 2025: 56% Have Integrated AI</image:title>
      <image:caption>As of January 2025, about 17 percent of marketing professionals reported using AI extensively across multiple channels and another 39 percent had integrated it in select areas — meaning 56 percent had AI in production. A further 26 percent were exploring AI but had not implemented it, while 13 percent had no plans to use AI in marketing.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/facebook-pixel-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Facebook Pixel? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Facebook Pixel the most? The United States leads with 538,358 domains, followed by Brazil (117,974), the United Kingdom (105,860), Australia (86,231) and Canada (71,277). India (66,918), Italy (45,605) and the Netherlands (40,778) come next. Brazil in second place is worth a sentence: it is a large, ad-heavy social commerce market where Meta carries an unusual share of retail demand, so the ordering here follows advertising spend rather than population or web size. These are counts of the domains we matched to a company record with a resolved country, so the table describes where pixel-carrying sites are registered rather than where any account is billed.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/facebook-pixel-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Facebook Pixel the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail tops the table at 7.06%, with Real Estate at 3.93%, Advertising Services at 3.46% and Construction at 2.82%. Nothing else reaches 3%, and the top ten industries together account for just under 31% of the domains we can classify. That flatness is the finding, not a gap in the data. A tool with a real buyer persona spikes somewhere. Facebook Pixel does not, because it follows advertising budget and every industry advertises on Meta. Read this distribution the way we read the tables on general-purpose infrastructure: it describes the shape of the commercial web, not a buyer.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/facebook-pixel-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Facebook Pixel Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Facebook Pixel only for small businesses? 60.78% of the domains we can size have 1 to 10 employees, 952,525 out of 1,567,200, with another 24.57% in the 11 to 50 band. Those two bands together are more than 85% of the sized base. At the other end, only 3,436 domains belong to companies with 10,001 or more employees and 2,863 to the 5,001 to 10,000 band. The large-organisation presence is real, and our crawl does place the pixel on domains owned by Infosys, HCLTech, HDFC Bank and Samsung, but it is a rounding error against the small business bulk. That is what a free tag looks like in a size distribution. Nothing filters it by company size, so the shape you see is mostly the shape of the commercial web.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/facebook-pixel-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Facebook Pixel Market Share Among Attribution &amp; Conversion Tracking</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Facebook Pixel&apos;s market share? Facebook Pixel holds 60.21% of attribution and conversion tracking, ranking #1 across 82 tracked technologies and 5,694,844 active domains. Google Ads Conversion Tracking follows at 15.99% (910,792 domains), then the LinkedIn Insight Tag at 7.48% (425,955) and the TikTok Pixel at 6.86% (390,736). Read the gap carefully. These tags are per-channel complements rather than substitutes, so a 60.21% share says the pixel is present on more domains than any rival, not that six advertisers in ten picked Meta over Google or TikTok. The pixel is also free, which removes the one filter that would keep it off a site that is not really using it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/faculty-views-ai-education-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Faculty Views on AI in Education 2025: 78% in LATAM See Opportunity</image:title>
      <image:caption>78% of Latin American faculty members view artificial intelligence&apos;s impact on education as an opportunity rather than a challenge — the highest opportunity share globally, according to the Digital Education Council&apos;s 2025 survey of 1,681 faculty across 52 institutions in 28 countries. In contrast, 43% of USA and Canada faculty see AI as a challenge — the highest cautious share worldwide. APAC sits at 70% opportunity / 30% challenge, EMEA at 65% / 35%. Every region surveyed has more optimists than skeptics, but margins range from 1.3x (USA &amp; Canada) to 3.5x (LATAM).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fast-fashion-rank-trajectory-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>H&amp;M Owns Fast Fashion&apos;s #2 Slot — Trendyol Only Touched It Twice</image:title>
      <image:caption>Cloudflare Radar&apos;s Internet Services timeseries gives a weekly rank per service. Read across 22 weeks of 2026, the Fast Fashion category has one immovable leader and one genuine mover. Shein held #1 every single week. H&amp;M held #2 for 20 of 22 weeks; Trendyol pushed it down to #3 on exactly two weeks (late March and early May), then fell back. A single-day snapshot taken in early May would catch one of those two Trendyol weeks and misread it as a takeover — which is exactly what happened in this report&apos;s May update, and why the June refresh leans on the weekly series. The real Q2 story is Uniqlo, whose line walks down from the #7-9 band into #4 by June 1.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fastbots-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use FastBots? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use FastBots the most? Of the 683 enriched companies, the United States supplies 181, the United Kingdom 60, India 38 and Australia 32. Germany follows at 20. The tail is broader than the head suggests, and two entries stand out for a product this size: South Africa (17) and Nigeria (16) both place above Canada, Spain, Switzerland and Denmark, which tie at 12. Below the top four no country contributes more than twenty companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fastbots-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use FastBots the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use FastBots? IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 7.34% (46 companies), well clear of Business Consulting and Services (4.15%) and Technology, Information and Internet (3.99%). Real Estate and Retail tie at 2.87%, Hospitality takes 2.71% and Construction 2.55%. Nothing else clears 2.4%, so past the first three this is a flat long tail. The lead held by IT consultancies is the only real structure in the table.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fastbots-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>FastBots Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size businesses install FastBots? Small ones. 53.72% of enriched companies have 1-10 employees and 29.59% have 11-50, so 83.31% of the base is under fifty people. Everything above 500 employees amounts to eighteen companies: 8 at 501-1,000, 6 at 1,001-5,000, 3 at 5,001-10,000 and 1 at 10,001+. That is a self-serve shape. It is slightly less extreme than a WordPress plugin&apos;s &amp;mdash; 51-200 holds 9.10% and 201-500 another 4.86% &amp;mdash; but there is no enterprise segment here to speak of.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fastbots-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>FastBots Market Share Among Live Chat &amp; Messaging</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is FastBots&apos; market share? 0.03% of the Live Chat &amp; Messaging category, ranking 99th, as of September 2026. Earlier versions of this page claimed 0.09% and 3rd place in an AI chatbots category; that belonged to the retired id and has been removed. 99th is not a verdict on the product. The category is enormous and mostly free at the top &amp;mdash; the leader, WhatsApp Business Chat, is a messaging link present on 1,076,295 domains &amp;mdash; so a vendor-hosted chatbot embed on 980 domains starts a long way down the table by arithmetic rather than by failure.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fastly-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Fastly? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Fastly? The United States accounts for 37.42% of enriched domains, then the United Kingdom (8.33%), India (6.83%), Brazil (4.77%), Germany (4.11%) and Canada (4.07%). That is a broader spread than the enterprise media brands at the top of the customer list would suggest, and it reflects a self-serve tier that developers can sign up for without talking to anyone.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fastly-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Fastly the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 10.28%, followed by IT Services (7.69%), Technology and Internet (5.21%) and Design Services (5.14%). That top figure is more than double the leading industry share on any other profile in this wave, where nothing clears 5%. Fastly&apos;s base is genuinely technical, which fits a product configured through VCL and API calls rather than a dashboard toggle.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fastly-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Fastly Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>79.97% of Fastly domains belong to companies with ten staff or fewer, the highest small-company share in this wave, from 49,307 enriched companies. That sits oddly beside Bloomberg and the United Nations Development Programme appearing at the top of the list. Both are true: Fastly serves a small number of very large media and technology properties alongside a long tail of individual developers and small studios on self-serve plans.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fastly-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Fastly Market Share Among CDN</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Fastly&apos;s market share? It holds 0.48% of our CDN category and ranks #12 of 49. That understates its commercial position, because the category mixes commercial edge networks with free public library CDNs that require no account: cdnjs (11.11%), jsDelivr (11.09%), Google Hosted Libraries (8.24%) and unpkg (3.36%) are all in the table above Fastly. Among paid edge platforms, Cloudflare leads on 47.35% and Fastly trails it and Google Cloud CDN.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fastly-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Fastly Usage Statistics 2011-2026: 92K Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Fastly enters our history in November 2011 on a single domain, the year the company was founded, and grows steadily: 2,034 domains by January 2016, 18,681 by January 2019, 79,785 by January 2022 and a long-run peak of 175,167 in March 2025. Our current live crawl records 91,625. That gap is a difference between two coverage periods rather than a collapse in usage, and header-based detection depends on which pages and hosts each crawl reaches. The decline through mid-2025 is the earlier coverage narrowing its own coverage, visible because total domains fall in step with active ones.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fathom-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Fathom? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States leads with 5,039 matched companies, 33.2% of the 15,191 we could identify, and the United Kingdom sits unusually close behind at 2,662 (17.5%) — together just over half the matched base. The shape underneath is the interesting part. Germany has 1,088 (7.2%) and the Netherlands 800 (5.3%), ahead of Canada&apos;s 714. Norway has 458 and Belgium 413, both ahead of France (383) and Australia (346), which is not a population ranking by any reading. The eleven European countries below the United Kingdom in this top fifteen hold 4,324 matched companies between them, 28.5% of the base. Fathom sells EU isolation, processing EU visitor data on servers in Germany (usefathom.com), and the distribution is what that pitch would predict: strongest in small, wealthy markets where privacy regulation bites hardest.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fathom-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Fathom the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development is the largest single industry at 5.82%, with Technology, Information and Internet at 4.51% and IT Services at 4.19% — 14.52% across the three, roughly one matched company in seven working in technology. Advertising Services (3.21%) and Business Consulting (3.12%) come next and most likely represent agencies running the tag across client sites. After that it flattens: Real Estate 2.77%, Non-profit Organizations 2.74%, Construction 2.43%, Professional Training and Coaching 2.06%, Design Services 2.01%. No industry reaches 6%, which makes Fathom horizontal in practice, with a technology and creative-services lean rather than a vertical concentration.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fathom-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Fathom Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>67.09% of matched companies employ ten people or fewer and 21.83% employ 11 to 50, so 88.92% of the sized base is under fifty staff. The tail thins fast: 7.25% at 51-200, 1.94% at 201-500, and just 54 companies above five thousand employees — 0.38% — split evenly between the 5,001-10,000 and 10,001+ bands at 27 each. Those 54 are why the company list on this page reads like an enterprise roster while the distribution says the opposite. Percentages here are shares of the 14,274 matched companies we could also place in a size band, not of all 24,423 detected domains.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fathom-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Fathom Market Share Among Web Analytics</image:title>
      <image:caption>Fathom Analytics holds 0.13% of the Web Analytics category and ranks 26th in it. The category we measure holds roughly 18.2 million domains, and its shape explains that number better than any judgement about Fathom does. Google Analytics is on 11,453,947 domains, 62.77%, and Site Kit, the WordPress plugin whose main job is installing Google Analytics, adds another 3.54%, so Google&apos;s surfaces are 66.31% of the category between them. Cloudflare Browser Insights is second at 11.34% (2,069,681 domains), switched on inside an account a site already has. Google Analytics&apos; footprint is roughly 469 times Fathom&apos;s. A subscription with no free tier is not competing for the same domains as a free default, so 0.13% describes the denominator more than the product. For a paid business the figure that carries more information is the base itself: 24,423 live domains, with 1,735 more that have dropped their detection since coverage began, a 7.1% churn ratio.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/figma-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Figma? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Figma the most? The United States dominates with 44.7% of all Figma customers in our data, followed by the United Kingdom (8.6%) and Germany (6.3%). English-speaking markets (US, UK, Australia, Canada) account for over 58% of the user base, based on our enriched company data. France, the Netherlands, and Switzerland round out the top tier, reflecting Figma&apos;s strong adoption across Western Europe.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/figma-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Figma the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development is the dominant industry at 15.34%, followed by IT Services (7.99%) and Financial Services (7.09%). Advertising Services at 6.01% reflects agencies using Figma for client work. No single industry exceeds 16%, making Figma a genuinely horizontal tool, adopted wherever teams build digital products, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/figma-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Figma Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Figma only for small businesses? Not at all. Only 7.9% of Figma customers have 1-10 employees, based on our analysis of 1,587 enriched companies. The largest segment is 51-200 employees at 25.1%, and 19.4% have 10,001+ employees. According to Figma&apos;s S-1 filing, 95% of Fortune 500 companies use the platform, and it counts 1,031 customers paying over $100,000 annually (up 47% YoY). Accenture, IBM, Siemens, Samsung, and Ford all appear in our detection data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/figma-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Figma Market Share Among Developer Tooling</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Figma&apos;s market share? Figma holds a 0.05% share of the Development Tools market, ranking #11 in the category, based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. In the broader design tools market, Figma commands roughly 40.65% market share, well ahead of Adobe XD (13.54%) and InVision (7.6%). Figma&apos;s relatively small footprint in our web detection data reflects that it&apos;s primarily a cloud-native app, not a technology that embeds client-side code the way analytics or CMS platforms do. Its 136% net dollar retention rate confirms strong expansion within existing accounts.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fingerprintjs-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use FingerprintJS? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use FingerprintJS the most? The United States leads with 41.34% of enriched companies, followed by an unexpected second place: Poland at 7.55%, just ahead of the United Kingdom (7.18%). The Polish cluster deserves a caveat rather than a headline. It is strikingly homogeneous — 90.8% run PHP, 86.7% carry Google Sign-in, and roughly 60% run LiteSpeed and LiteSpeed Cache — which is the signature of a shared platform or hosting stack rather than 2,200 independent adoptions. France (3.64%), Germany (3.63%), and India (3.56%) follow, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fingerprintjs-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use FingerprintJS the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Real Estate leads at 11.44%, followed by Retail (8.42%) and Motor Vehicle Manufacturing (4.55%). That top three is a fraud-surface list rather than a technology list: property enquiry forms, retail checkout, and dealership lead forms are three of the most abused submission points on the consumer web. No other vertical exceeds 3%, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fingerprintjs-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>FingerprintJS Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is FingerprintJS only for small businesses? Small teams are the core: 55.34% of enriched companies have 1-10 employees and another 24.84% sit in the 11-50 band, which is the profile of an open-source library adopted by developers. The enterprise tail is small in count — 136 organisations with 10,001+ employees — but high in quality, and it includes Baidu, Siemens, Chase, Ping An Insurance, Palo Alto Networks, and The Hartford, based on our analysis of 29,621 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fingerprintjs-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>FingerprintJS Market Share Among Visitor Identification</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is FingerprintJS&apos;s market share? FingerprintJS holds a 25.81% share of Visitor Identification and ranks #1, ahead of ipapi.co (14.42%), Leadfeeder (12.57%), ip-api (10.27%), and Zoominfo (10.13%), based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains at TechnologyChecker.io. It is worth reading the category as two different businesses sharing a label: FingerprintJS identifies a returning device for fraud prevention, while Leadfeeder, Zoominfo, and Leadinfo resolve an IP address to a company for B2B sales. They rarely compete for the same budget.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/firebase-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Firebase? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States leads with 26,292 matched domains, then India on 9,079, the United Kingdom on 5,526 and Brazil on 5,032. Canada (3,150), France (2,507), Australia (2,367), Germany (2,207) and Japan (1,956) follow, with the Netherlands (1,637), Spain (1,619), Italy (1,256), Mexico (1,249), Turkey (1,210) and Belgium (849) behind them. India in second place is the entry worth sitting with: Firebase&apos;s footprint tracks the developer population rather than the enterprise software map, and a free tier plus a mobile-first market puts it in front of an enormous number of small teams. These are counts inside the 96,521 domains we could match to a company record, not the full detected base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/firebase-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Firebase the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Among domains matched to a company with a resolved industry, Software Development leads with 8,361 domains (9.47%), followed by IT Services and IT Consulting (6,224, 7.05%) and Technology, Information and Internet (5,992, 6.79%). After that the distribution flattens quickly: Financial Services (2,495, 2.83%), Retail (2,056, 2.33%), Primary and Secondary Education (2,051, 2.32%), Business Consulting and Services (1,955, 2.21%), Real Estate (1,946, 2.2%), Education Administration Programs (1,787, 2.02%) and Advertising Services (1,680, 1.9%). Percentages are shares of all industry-resolved domains, not of these ten.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/firebase-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Firebase Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Company size skews small, and hard. Of the 92,067 domains where we could resolve an employee band, 63.98% (58,908 domains) are 1-10 employee companies and 21.59% (19,878) are 11-50, so the two smallest bands cover more than eight in ten. The 10,001+ band is 0.27% (244 domains), but that thin slice holds Carrefour, Penn State, Red Bull, Decathlon, Kraft Heinz and Reckitt Benckiser Group. Both readings are true at once: Firebase is what a two-person team reaches for first, and it is also what one product team inside a very large company uses for one app.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/firebase-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Firebase Market Share Among PaaS</image:title>
      <image:caption>Firebase ranks #5 of the 41 ranked technologies in Platform as a Service, with 6.87% of the category on 160,932 domains in the August reading. Amazon Web Services (936,363 domains, 39.98%), Vercel (389,653, 16.64%), WordPress.com (193,092, 8.24%) and Azure (175,651, 7.5%) sit above it, and Netlify (154,481, 6.6%) just below. That figure is a share of the domains we detect running something in this category, not a share of app backends and not a share of all websites, so it is not comparable to numbers built on other denominators. Company records could be matched for 96,521 of those domains, and every size, industry, age and country breakdown on this page describes that matched subset rather than the full detected base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/font-awesome-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Font Awesome? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Font Awesome the most? The United States accounts for 24.34% of enriched sites, then Germany (7.59%), the United Kingdom (7.21%), India (7.14%) and Brazil (6.08%). That is one of the flattest distributions in our index, which is what you expect from a free open-source library with a CDN: no sales motion, no regional pricing, no localisation barrier.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/font-awesome-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Font Awesome the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Construction leads on 4.17%, then Retail (3.97%), IT Services (3.94%) and Real Estate (3.44%). No industry passes 4.2%, and that flatness is the finding. Font Awesome is not a vertical tool that found a niche, it is a default that arrived with a theme or a framework, so its industry mix is close to the industry mix of the web itself.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/font-awesome-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Font Awesome Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>63.44% of Font Awesome sites belong to companies with ten staff or fewer and 22.87% to companies with 11 to 50, from 3,495,049 enriched companies. The enterprise presence is real but thin in percentage terms, which is the usual shape for a free developer tool: everyone uses it, and almost everyone using it is small.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/font-awesome-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Font Awesome Market Share Among Font Services</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Font Awesome&apos;s market share? It holds 29.34% of the font and icon services we track and ranks #2 of 17, behind the Google Font API on 56.52%. Those two are the category: third-placed Adobe Fonts sits on 6.48%. The two leaders are complements rather than rivals, since one supplies typefaces and the other supplies icons, and 28.64% of Font Awesome sites run both.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/font-awesome-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Font Awesome Usage Statistics 2012-2026: 5.7M Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Font Awesome enters our history in October 2012 on 128 sites, the month version 1.0 shipped, and the curve is close to vertical for the next six years: 329,374 by January 2016 and 1,454,881 by January 2019. It reached 4,137,334 by April 2025, the last clean month in our long-run feed. Our archive carries a flat handful of domains dating back to 2005, which predates the product by seven years and is a backfill artifact, so we trim the series to the launch month rather than publish a false start date. The decline after April 2025 is that feed narrowing its coverage, not sites removing the library.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/forethought-ai-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Forethought AI? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Forethought AI? One, effectively. Of the 106 enriched companies, 80 are in the United States. Canada contributes 6, the United Kingdom and Germany 3 each, India 2, and eleven further countries one apiece: Spain, Czechia, Sweden, Austria, Malaysia, Latvia, the Netherlands, the United Arab Emirates, Norway and Belgium. At single-digit counts the ordering below the United States carries no information at all. The concentration itself is the only fact this chart supports.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/forethought-ai-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Forethought AI the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use Forethought AI? One dominates. Software Development takes 29.81% (31 companies), more than six times the next entry. Wellness and Fitness Services follows at 4.81% (5 companies), then Computer Hardware Manufacturing, Technology, Information and Internet, Retail and Human Resources Services at 3.85% each (4 apiece). Below the leader every row is four companies or fewer, so the ordering there should be ignored. The one fact this chart supports is that Forethought AI&apos;s visible base is software companies running their own help centres.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/forethought-ai-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Forethought AI Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies run Forethought AI? Mid-market, on this sample. 51-200 employees is the largest band at 35.24% (37 companies), followed by 11-50 at 20% (21 companies), 201-500 at 13.33% (14) and 1,001-5,000 at 12.38% (13). Only 11 companies sit at 1-10. Two things to note. There is no 5,001-10,000 or 10,001+ band at all in this sample: the largest enriched customers top out in the 1,001-5,000 range. And the whole distribution rests on about a hundred records, so a single reclassification moves any of these figures by roughly a point. This is the shape of the base, not a precise measurement.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/formidable-form-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Formidable Forms? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Formidable Forms the most? The United States leads with 25,832 companies (44.0%), followed by the United Kingdom at 6,222 (10.6%), Canada at 4,517 (7.7%), France at 3,639 (6.2%), Germany at 3,265 (5.6%) and the Netherlands at 2,972 (5.1%). Australia, Spain, India, Italy and South Africa follow. This is a broader distribution than any hosted platform in the category. Typeform concentrates 40.7% in the US with a strong European tail; Qualtrics and Medallia skew further toward enterprise North America. A plugin that can be installed by anyone with a WordPress site, in any country, at no cost, ends up wherever WordPress is — which is nearly everywhere.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/formidable-form-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Formidable Forms the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Formidable Forms has the flattest industry distribution of any technology we profile. Construction leads at just 5.38%, ahead of Business Consulting &amp; Services (3.08%), IT Services &amp; Consulting (2.9%), Real Estate (2.87%), Non-profit Organizations (2.63%), Advertising Services (2.54%) and Medical Practices (2.53%). The top ten verticals together account for under 29% of the base. That flatness is the finding. A vertical concentration tells you a product solves one industry&apos;s problem; its absence here tells you Formidable Forms solves a problem every industry has — collecting a structured answer on a website — and that its distribution is WordPress&apos;s, not a market&apos;s.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/formidable-form-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Formidable Forms Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Formidable Forms? 61.62% of matched companies have 1-10 employees once the equivalent LinkedIn bands are merged, with 24.8% at 11-50 and 8.98% at 51-200. Large organisations are a thin tail: 0.75% at 1,001-5,000 and 0.13% above 10,000. The tail is more interesting than its size. It contains Decathlon, Life Time, AirAsia, Apparel Group, Glenmark, Asia Pulp &amp; Paper and several universities — McMaster, Georgia State, the University of Utah — alongside Vanderbilt Medical Group and Allied Bank. Large institutions running WordPress tend to run it across many departmental sites, and a free form plugin is the path of least resistance for every one of them.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/formidable-form-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Formidable Forms Market Share Among Surveys &amp; Feedback</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Formidable Forms&apos; market share? Formidable Forms holds 46.74% of the Surveys &amp; Feedback category with 93,816 domains, ranking 1st of 63 tracked technologies — more than four times Qualtrics at 10.8% and nine times Typeform at 5.2%. The number is real and the comparison is not quite fair. Formidable Forms is a plugin that installs into WordPress, and WordPress powers a large fraction of the web; Qualtrics, Medallia and Typeform are hosted platforms a company signs a contract for. The category ranks both on the same axis, so a plugin&apos;s distribution advantage reads as market dominance. Our data cannot distinguish a site that built its whole research programme on Formidable from one that used it for a single contact form.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/foxit-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Foxit? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Foxit the most? The United States holds 4,021 of the 8,351 companies we could place, 48.15%, ahead of the United Kingdom on 693 (8.30%), Canada on 673 (8.06%), Australia on 480 (5.75%) and Germany on 474 (5.68%). Then the Netherlands 311 (3.72%), Switzerland 254 (3.04%), France 184 (2.20%), New Zealand 164 (1.96%), Belgium 106 (1.27%), Spain 97 (1.16%), Norway 73 (0.87%), Thailand 65 (0.78%), Italy 56 (0.67%) and Denmark 52 (0.62%). The shape worth naming is the English-speaking block: the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand together are 6,031 companies, 72.22% of the 8,351. Continental Europe sits behind that, led by Germany and the Netherlands, with Switzerland at 254 ahead of France at 184 despite a far smaller economy, which is what a base of banks, insurers and engineering firms tends to look like. Two caveats before reading the table. Country here is the headquarters on the company record, not where the software is installed. And because a verification record is published once at a group apex, a multinational that buys centrally appears once under its head office rather than once per subsidiary, which pushes weight toward the countries where head offices sit.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/foxit-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Foxit the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Construction leads at 7.40% of the 8,066 companies with a recorded industry, 597 companies, ahead of Financial Services on 429 (5.32%), Hospitals and Health Care on 400 (4.96%), IT Services and IT Consulting on 378 (4.69%) and Insurance on 340 (4.22%). Then Law Practice 291 (3.61%), Real Estate 263 (3.26%), Non-profit Organizations 168 (2.08%), Government Administration 165 (2.05%) and Oil and Gas 153 (1.90%). Group the labels that describe the same problem and the base gets easier to read. Financial Services, Insurance, Law Practice, Hospitals and Health Care and Government Administration come to 1,625 companies, 20.15% of the 8,066: a document-heavy regulated block where a PDF is the file that gets signed, redacted, retained and audited. Construction belongs beside it for a related reason. It runs on drawings, submittals, requests for information and executed contracts, so the industry at the top of this table is the one whose daily work product is a document. No label passes 8%, which is itself worth saying: Foxit is not a vertical product. The ten labels shown account for 3,184 companies and the rest of the table carries the remaining 4,882 of the 8,066, 60.52%, spread thinly across everything else.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/foxit-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Foxit Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Foxit? This is a mid-market base and the distribution says so without much ambiguity. 2,304 of the 8,356 companies with a size band, 27.57%, employ 51 to 200 people, the largest band in the table, with 11-50 second on 1,965 (23.52%) and 1-10 third on 1,380 (16.52%). Widen it one step and 51 to 500 employees is 3,530 companies, 42.24% of the 8,356, against 3,345 (40.03%) at fifty or fewer and only 861 companies, 10.30%, above a thousand. The tail is thin at the top: 620 companies at 501-1,000 (7.42%), 619 at 1,001-5,000 (7.41%), 113 at 5,001-10,000 (1.35%) and 129 at 10,001+ (1.54%). Now set that against the named table, where every organisation shown sits in the two largest bands, because that list is ordered by LinkedIn following. It shows the top of the base rather than its centre. The centre is a firm of a hundred or so people that produces enough contracts, drawings, reports and signed documents to want paid PDF editing deployed across the office, and that is a different buyer, on a different budget, from the ones in the logo table.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/foxit-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Foxit Market Share Among Documentation Platforms</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Foxit&apos;s market share? Foxit holds 5.00% of Documentation Platforms and ranks 2nd of 70 in that category, on 8,700 domains. Second place needs handling, because it sounds like more than it is. Zendesk leads the category on 111,482 domains and 64.05%, close to thirteen times Foxit&apos;s count and thirteen times its share. The rows nearest Foxit are MediaWiki on 6,097 domains (3.50%), Postman API Documentation on 6,068 (3.49%) and Docusaurus on 5,507 (3.16%). Those three, and Zendesk above them, publish documentation onto the web: a help centre, a wiki, an API reference, a static docs site. Foxit is PDF software installed on desktops and servers. Being second in this table means Foxit is the second most-detected technology filed on that shelf; it does not mean Foxit and Zendesk are shortlisted against each other. The two are not even measured on the same surface. Zendesk is found on a help centre served to a browser, Foxit in a DNS record on the apex. A share computed across two kinds of evidence is a position in a taxonomy, not a measure of spend, seats or documents processed.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/framer-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Framer? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Framer the most? The United States leads with 11,075 domains, ahead of the United Kingdom (3,518), India (2,580), Germany (2,128) and the Netherlands (1,862). The Netherlands in fifth is worth a note: Framer was founded in Amsterdam, and its home market outranks France (1,495), Canada (1,437) and Australia (1,384) on a fraction of their populations. Brazil sits above all three as well, on 1,825 domains. Spain (737), the United Arab Emirates (623), Switzerland (604), Sweden (544), Italy (498) and Turkey (468) fill out the top fifteen. These counts cover the 45,833 domains we hold company detail for, not the full 58,661.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/framer-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Framer the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 8.97% (3,948 domains), followed by Technology, Information and Internet at 6.57% (2,891) and Design Services at 6.47% (2,849). Design Services in third place is the finding here, and it does not stand alone: Advertising Services adds 2,317 domains (5.27%) and Marketing Services another 2,145 (4.87%). Taken together, the design and marketing agency cluster is 7,311 domains, more than software and technology combined. IT Services and IT Consulting (2,277), Business Consulting and Services (2,041), Financial Services (1,632), Media Production (1,003) and Construction (862) follow. Percentages describe the domains we hold company detail for.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/framer-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Framer Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Framer only for small teams? Mostly, yes. 70.6% of the Framer domains we profile belong to companies with 1-10 employees, and the 11-50 band takes it to 92.05%, or 41,373 of the 44,949 domains carrying an employee band. That is the solo-founder and small-studio core. The tail above it is thin as a share and concrete in absolute terms: 2,613 domains at 51-200 employees, 620 at 201-500, and 164 across the three bands over 1,000. Razorpay, Urban Company, SunPower and Covisian all sit in that tail, and the detection is often on one host rather than the whole estate: Urban Company&apos;s is on investorrelations.urbancompany.com, Centific&apos;s on multilingualai.centific.com. These shares describe the domains we hold company detail for.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/framer-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Framer Market Share Among CMS &amp; Website Builders</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Framer&apos;s market share? Framer holds 0.38% of CMS and Website Builders and ranks #13 in the category on 58,661 domains. Everything above it in the category is in a different weight class. WordPress alone takes 62.27% on 9,519,706 domains, then Wix (1,297,463, 8.49%), Squarespace (1,017,426, 6.66%), GoDaddy Website Builder (710,312, 4.65%) and Webflow (262,281, 1.72%). In a category this old, share is a measure of accumulated stock, and Framer has had far less time to accumulate it. The number worth reading is direction: every one of those five sends Framer more domains than it takes back, 2,980 arriving against 404 leaving.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/froala-editor-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Froala Editor? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States is 16,476 of the companies we can place, an order of magnitude ahead of the United Kingdom at 1,611. Belgium at 1,338 and South Korea at 1,069 rank higher than their share of the web would suggest, and both of those are platform effects rather than national preferences.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/froala-editor-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Froala Editor the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Government Administration leads at 8.22%, then Restaurants at 5.55% and Religious Institutions at 3.68%. That is not a combination any editor wins on its merits, and the explanation is below.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/froala-editor-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Froala Editor Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>59.06% of the companies we can size have 10 employees or fewer and 22.48% have 11 to 50. Froala is a paid commercial editor, so that skew is not about price sensitivity. It is about who the buyer is: the licence is usually held by the platform vendor, and what we detect is that vendor&apos;s customers, most of whom are small.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/froala-editor-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Froala Editor Market Share Among WYSIWYG Editors</image:title>
      <image:caption>Froala is first in the WYSIWYG Editors category at 30.25% of 189,196 domains, ahead of TinyMCE (27.67%) and CKEditor (20.73%). Read that rank with the mechanism in mind. Froala is matched on the fr-view and fr-box classes it leaves in published content; TinyMCE and CKEditor are matched on the editor script loading. A page written in Froala keeps matching forever, while a page written in TinyMCE only matches where the editor itself is served. The four leaders are genuinely close, but they are not measured the same way.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fullstory-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use FullStory? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use FullStory the most? The United States dominates with 5,802 of the 10,277 domains we matched to a company record, more than the other fourteen countries in the table combined. The United Kingdom follows at 719, Australia at 485, and Canada at 446. FullStory is the most US-concentrated tool in this category by a wide margin, well ahead of both Microsoft Clarity and Hotjar, which is what a US-headquartered platform sold on enterprise contracts rather than self-serve signups tends to look like. Europe is thin by comparison: France at 162, Germany at 107, Spain at 85, and the Netherlands at 65.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fullstory-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use FullStory the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 9.97%, well clear of Technology, Information and Internet at 6.28%, Retail at 5.3%, and Financial Services at 4.78%. That is a much sharper peak than the free tools in this category show, where the leading vertical does not clear 5%, and it is the clearest industry signal on the page. Add the three technology categories together and software, internet, and IT services account for 1,927 of the 9,398 records where we know the industry, a little over a fifth of the base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fullstory-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>FullStory Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is FullStory only for small businesses? 55.38% of the 9,938 domains where we know headcount have 1-10 employees, and 78.3% have 50 or fewer. That skew is real, and it is what a domain count does rather than what FullStory sells: a two-person agency and Target each get one row. The other end of the curve is where the contracts are. 1,051 domains belong to companies above 200 staff and 90 to companies of 10,001 or more, a group that includes Target, Lowe&apos;s, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Netflix, Intuit, Autodesk, Itau Unibanco, and Qantas.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/fullstory-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>FullStory Market Share Among Heatmaps &amp; Session Recording</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is FullStory&apos;s market share? FullStory holds 1.62% of Heatmaps &amp; Session Recording and ranks 6th of 34 tracked tools, behind Microsoft Clarity at 53.63%, Hotjar at 26.93%, Crazy Egg at 7.42%, Contentsquare at 1.94%, and Lucky Orange at 1.64%. Share of domains is the wrong yardstick for this product. Clarity, Hotjar, and Crazy Egg are free or entry-priced, so they spread across hundreds of thousands of small sites, while FullStory is a paid contract sold to product and engineering teams. The comparison that means something commercially is Contentsquare, the other enterprise-priced platform in the category, and Contentsquare sits 5,124 domains ahead.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gatsby-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Gatsby? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 5,609 matched companies, or 32.81% of those with a known country, followed by the United Kingdom at 9.33% (1,595) and Australia at 8.13% (1,390). Germany and France follow at 4.75% and 4.29%. The Australian share runs notably above the corpus norm.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gatsby-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Gatsby the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 9.99%, followed by IT Services and IT Consulting (7.55%), Technology, Information and Internet (4.33%), Construction (3.63%) and Financial Services (3.29%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gatsby-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Gatsby Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Gatsby has a more professional base than most open-source frameworks. Companies of 1 to 10 employees are 53.96% of matched customers and 11 to 50 a further 28.63%, but 51 to 200 takes 10.13% and organisations above 1,000 employees 2.54%. That mid-market weighting reflects the agency-built marketing sites Gatsby was widely adopted for.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gatsby-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Gatsby Market Share Among Static Site Generators</image:title>
      <image:caption>Gatsby holds 2.71% of the Static Site Generators category and ranks 3rd of 26 tracked technologies, behind Next.js (66.60%) and Astro (26.13%) and narrowly ahead of Hugo (2.61%). Third place understates the direction of travel: the same two technologies above it are where Gatsby&apos;s departing sites are going.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gb-parents-smartphone-ban-opinion-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GB Parent Opinion on Kids&apos; Smartphone Ban 2024: 52% of 11-15 Parents Oppose</image:title>
      <image:caption>When the UK government floated a smartphone sales ban for under-16s in April 2024, 52% of parents with 11-15-year-olds opposed it — more than double the 25% who supported. Parents argued that the benefits of equipping kids with a reachable device outweigh the disadvantages of online exposure.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gb-social-media-platforms-by-age-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GB Social Media Platforms by Age 2024: Snapchat +49pp for Young Voters</image:title>
      <image:caption>Two platforms where Gen Z dominates: Snapchat (+49pp gap vs 25-49) and TikTok (+30pp). Facebook is the only platform where 25-49-year-olds lead by 16 percentage points. The political implication, in the pre-UK-election context: young voters were potentially most exposed to AI-generated and viral political content during the campaign.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gen-z-millennial-social-activities-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>UK Social Media Activities by Generation 2024: Gen Z +14pp on Influencer Likes</image:title>
      <image:caption>The two largest behavioral gaps between UK Gen Z and millennials are liking influencer content (+14pp) and sharing influencer content (+7pp). These are exactly the behaviors that drive creator-economy growth. Branded company posts get shared at the same rate by both cohorts — earned social proof through creators is the channel, not corporate posts.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gen-z-uk-ad-recall-channels-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>UK Gen Z Ad Recall Channels 2024: Video Portals (47%) Pass TV (40%)</image:title>
      <image:caption>For the first time in this Statista dossier series, digital video portals (47%) and social media (46%) have both passed TV (40%) for Gen Z ad recall. Less than half of UK Gen Z watch traditional TV at all. The strong video gaming channel (28%) is often overlooked — in-game advertising reaches roughly the same proportion of UK Gen Z as brand websites.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gen-z-uk-age-cohort-2023.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>UK Gen Z Age Cohort Sizes 2023: Bimodal Peaks at 12 and 26</image:title>
      <image:caption>UK Gen Z is bimodal: the oldest cohort (age 26) is the largest single-year group at roughly 887,000 people, with the youngest end (age 12) close behind at 849,000. The smallest groups sit in the middle (ages 17-19, around 788,000-795,000). A 13-year-old and a 26-year-old share little besides age range — lifecycle, period, and cohort effects diverge sharply within the same generation.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gen-z-uk-cost-of-living-social-networks-2023.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>UK Gen Z Cost-of-Living Crisis Content 2023: 69% Turn to TikTok</image:title>
      <image:caption>When UK Gen Z wants information about the cost-of-living crisis, 69% turn to TikTok — more than Instagram (49%) or YouTube (46%). For news organizations still treating TikTok as a young people&apos;s &apos;fun app&apos;, this number should reframe the strategy entirely. Seven in ten UK Gen Zers find useful content on TikTok about an issue traditionally covered by newspapers and television.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gen-z-uk-digital-media-users-2023.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>UK Gen Z Digital Media Users 2023: 12.7M Online, 5.3M Podcast Listeners</image:title>
      <image:caption>12.7 million UK Gen Z are internet users, and 97% of them watch digital video. The podcast number (5.3 million, or 42% of UK Gen Z internet users) is the surprise — more than half of UK Gen Z does not listen to podcasts. For audio advertisers, that&apos;s a useful corrective to the &apos;Gen Z = podcast generation&apos; narrative.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gen-z-uk-fashion-online-stores-2023.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>UK Gen Z Online Fashion Retailers 2023: Amazon 41%, SHEIN 23% Beats ASOS</image:title>
      <image:caption>Amazon (41%) dominates UK Gen Z fashion shopping, but the more telling number is SHEIN (23%) overtaking ASOS (21%). ASOS revenues fell from £4 billion in 2022 to £2.9 billion in 2024, while SHEIN claimed enough UK market share to file for an IPO at a ~$70 billion valuation in July 2024.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gen-z-uk-life-priorities-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Gen Z UK Life Priorities 2024: 48% Choose Success vs 28% Nationally</image:title>
      <image:caption>Asked to rank what matters most in life, UK Gen Z places significantly more emphasis on being successful (48% vs 28% nationally) and advancing their career (23% vs 13%) than older cohorts. The popular narrative of Gen Z as anti-work doesn&apos;t match the polling data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gen-z-uk-most-important-issues-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Most Important Issues for UK Gen Z 2024: 55% Cite Cost of Living</image:title>
      <image:caption>55% of UK Gen Z named &apos;rising prices, inflation, and cost of living&apos; as the most important issue facing the country. The economic cluster (housing, poverty, economy, unemployment) dwarfs every other concern. Climate change (30%) and environment (27%) rank BELOW crime (32%) and unemployment (36%) — a meaningful inversion of the typical Gen Z stereotype.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gen-z-uk-personal-finances-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Gen Z UK Personal Finance Attitudes 2024: 33% Worry About the Future</image:title>
      <image:caption>UK Gen Z is simultaneously financially anxious and financially confident in digital tools. 33% worry about their financial future, while 29% would conduct all financial transactions exclusively via smartphone — a number that has roughly tripled in the last six years.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gen-z-uk-social-media-apps-reach-time-2023.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>UK Gen Z Social Media Apps 2023: TikTok Wins 118 Min/Day Despite 38% Reach</image:title>
      <image:caption>Instagram has the highest reach among UK Gen Z (53%), but TikTok dominates daily time — 118 minutes per day, nearly 4x Instagram&apos;s 29 minutes. Snapchat is the dark horse: 45% reach but 80 minutes per day, the second-highest engagement. Reach-first and time-first social strategies lead to different platform choices.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genai-adoption-concerns-organizations-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Top GenAI Adoption Concerns 2024: 53% Fear Greater Risk Exposure</image:title>
      <image:caption>53 percent of cybersecurity professionals fear GenAI adoption will open their organization to greater risks. 37 percent worry it won&apos;t be done strategically. 32 percent cite past incorrect information from GenAI and 30 percent don&apos;t trust its recommendations. Only 12 percent worry about workflow slowdowns — implying the efficiency gains are broadly accepted even among skeptics.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genai-adoption-status-brands-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Brand GenAI Adoption Status 2024: 30% Running Pilot Projects</image:title>
      <image:caption>In a survey conducted in September and October 2024, about 30 percent of marketers said their organizations were implementing initial generative AI solutions, including pilot projects. Around 27 percent had solutions in place and were evaluating effectiveness, while 21 percent reported no formal adoption strategy. Only 2 percent said company policy prohibited GenAI use.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genai-cybersecurity-threat-concerns-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GenAI Cybersecurity Threat Concerns 2024: 47% Fear Adversarial Capabilities</image:title>
      <image:caption>Global business and cyber leaders rank adversarial capabilities (phishing, malware, deepfakes) as the top GenAI threat at 47 percent. Another 22 percent flag data leaks and PII exposure through GenAI. Supply chain, IP, and system security concerns sit at 17 percent. Deepfakes are no longer a curiosity — they are a Board-level risk.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genai-cybersecurity-workplace-uses-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Top GenAI Capabilities Used in Cybersecurity Workplaces 2024</image:title>
      <image:caption>56 percent of cybersecurity professionals use GenAI to augment operational tasks, 49 percent for report writing and incident reporting, 47 percent for threat intelligence, 43 percent for threat hunting, and 41 percent for policy simulations. Adoption is concentrated in reporting and analysis, not active autonomous defense. That follows the same pattern as developer adoption: AI wins the authoring phase first.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genai-device-shipments-by-segment-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GenAI Device Shipments 2024: 240M Smartphones, 54.5M PCs</image:title>
      <image:caption>Gartner forecast 240 million generative AI smartphones and 54.5 million generative AI PCs shipping worldwide in 2024. Nearly 295 million AI-capable personal devices entering the market in a single year — a hardware reset that rhymes with the mobile-internet transition of the late 2000s.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genai-marketing-challenges-organizations-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Biggest GenAI Marketing Challenges 2024: Reliability Tops at 35%</image:title>
      <image:caption>In a survey conducted in September and October 2024, about 35 percent of marketers worldwide cited concerns about the reliability of generative AI — including hallucinations — among the biggest challenges to using it in marketing. Lack of skills and training (30%) and security risks (29%) followed. Limited or poor-quality data and limited budgets tied at the bottom, at 18 percent each.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genai-service-rankings-may-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Generative AI Service Rankings, June 1, 2026: ChatGPT Still #1, Gemini Reclaims #4</image:title>
      <image:caption>ChatGPT held the #1 generative AI ranking on June 1, 2026 — unbroken since at least Feb 23, 2026, roughly 98 days. Claude is locked at #2 and Perplexity at #3. Google Gemini reclaimed #4 from DeepSeek (now #5) in late May. Character.AI sits at #6, GitHub Copilot at #7, and Grok/xAI slipped to #8. Doubao (ByteDance), which first entered the top 10 in May, held its place into June at #10.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genai-smartphone-share-2025-2029.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GenAI Smartphone Share of Shipments: 30% in 2025 to 57% by 2029</image:title>
      <image:caption>GenAI-capable smartphones are forecast to climb from 30 percent of worldwide shipments in 2025 to 57 percent by 2029, a 27-percentage-point swing. The majority-AI crossover happens sometime between 2027 and 2028.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genai-smartphone-shipments-2023-2028.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GenAI Smartphone Shipments 2023-2028: 51M to Forecast 912M (17x)</image:title>
      <image:caption>Generative AI smartphone shipments grow from 51 million units in 2023 to a forecast 912 million in 2028, a 17x increase in five years. The 2026 tipping point (688 million units) is when GenAI smartphones become the default tier rather than a premium one.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genai-social-media-benefits-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Top GenAI Social Media Benefits 2024: Efficiency Leads at 38%</image:title>
      <image:caption>As of May 2024, around 38 percent of marketers cited increased efficiency among the benefits of using generative AI for social media marketing. Easier idea generation followed at 34 percent, with increased content production and enhanced creativity tied at 33 percent. Reduced costs (32%) ranked just behind, showing that speed and ideation — not just savings — drive GenAI&apos;s appeal.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genai-social-media-challenges-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Top GenAI Social Media Challenges 2024: Authenticity Tops at 43%</image:title>
      <image:caption>As of May 2024, around 43 percent of marketers said maintaining authenticity was a challenge when using generative AI for social media marketing. Maintaining the value of human creativity ranked second at 40 percent, followed by ensuring content resonates (35%) and keeping up with AI advancements (33%). Labeling GenAI content and overcoming internal resistance were the least-cited challenges.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genai-traffic-share-similarweb-2025-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GenAI Web Traffic Share 2025–2026: ChatGPT 87%→57%, Gemini 6%→25%</image:title>
      <image:caption>ChatGPT&apos;s share of generative AI web traffic fell from 87% in early 2025 to 56.72% by March 2026 — a 30-point drop in 12 months. Google Gemini surged from 6% to 25.46% over the same window, the largest share gain by any AI chatbot we&apos;ve tracked. Anthropic&apos;s Claude grew from 1.4% to 6.02%, the third-largest gainer. The pattern: ChatGPT still leads, but the AI chat market is rapidly diversifying.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/generative-ai-market-growth-2021-2031.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Generative AI Market Growth 2021-2031: 85% Peak in 2024, 20% by 2031</image:title>
      <image:caption>The global generative AI market grew 85% year-over-year in 2024 — the highest single-year growth rate for any segment in the Statista AI dossier — and is forecast to decelerate to 20.09% by 2031, according to Statista Market Insights. Generative AI is the only AI segment with no contraction year in the eleven-year series; the lack of a 2022 dip reflects that GenAI revenue was almost zero before ChatGPT&apos;s November 2022 launch. The 64.91-percentage-point forecast deceleration is the steepest in the dossier — but the segment is still growing 20% annually from a $442 billion base by 2031.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/generative-ai-market-size-europe-2020-2031.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Europe Generative AI Market 2020-2031: $11.77B in 2024 to $137B Forecast</image:title>
      <image:caption>Europe&apos;s generative AI market reached $11.77 billion in 2024 and is forecast to grow to $137.28 billion by 2031, according to Statista Market Insights — adding $125.51 billion over seven years. Europe runs essentially parallel to the United States at near-identical absolute dollar levels: Europe $11.77B vs. US $12.26B in 2024, Europe $137B vs. US $143B in 2031. Europe holds roughly 31% of the global generative AI market versus 32% for the US — the &apos;EU is behind on AI&apos; narrative does not show up in this revenue dataset.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/generative-ai-market-size-forecast-2020-2031.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Generative AI Market Forecast 2020-2031: $5.5B to $442B</image:title>
      <image:caption>The generative AI segment of the AI market is projected to grow from roughly $5.5 billion in 2020 to $442 billion by 2031 — an 80x expansion. The 2024 market size of $37.87 billion is forecast to rise by $404.2 billion over the 2024-2031 period. GenAI growth rates peak in 2024 (+85%) and taper to ~20% by 2031 as the base gets larger.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/generative-ai-market-size-us-2020-2031.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>US Generative AI Market 2020-2031: $12.26B in 2024 to $143B Forecast</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States generative AI market reached $12.26 billion in 2024 and is forecast to grow to $143.15 billion by 2031, according to Statista Market Insights — an 11.7x expansion adding $130.89 billion over seven years. The US accounts for roughly 32-33% of global generative AI revenue across the forecast period, neither growing nor shrinking its share of the worldwide market. By 2031, the US GenAI market alone will be more than twice the size of the entire global GenAI market in 2025.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genesys-cloud-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Genesys Cloud? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use the Genesys Cloud web chat widget the most? Australia leads, and not narrowly: 346 of the 1,066 enriched companies, against 211 for the United States. Spain is third at 63, the United Kingdom fourth at 45 and New Zealand fifth at 40. Australia and New Zealand together supply 386 companies, more than the United States. That is an unusual shape for an American-headquartered platform, and we are reporting it rather than explaining it: detection data records where a widget is embedded, not why.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genesys-cloud-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Genesys Cloud the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries embed the Genesys Cloud web chat widget? Financial Services at 6.99% and Utilities at 6.47% lead, followed by Hospitality (4.90%), Hospitals and Health Care (4.28%), Insurance (4.28%), Telecommunications (4.07%), Restaurants (3.75%) and Government Administration (3.65%). Those are the sectors that run large inbound contact centres, so the result is the expected one. Financial Services, Insurance, Utilities, Telecommunications and Government Administration account for 25.46% of the enriched base between them.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genesys-cloud-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Genesys Cloud Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size organisations embed the widget? There is no dominant band, which is unusual on a profile this size. 1-10 employees is the largest at 29.54%, but 51-200 takes 17.34%, 11-50 13.61%, 201-500 13.31% and 1,001-5,000 12.10%. Above 500 employees sits 26.22% of the enriched base: 93 companies at 501-1,000, 120 at 1,001-5,000, 19 at 5,001-10,000 and 28 at 10,001+. Read the 1-10 row carefully. Our firmographic match runs on the registered domain, and the domains here are mostly self-service subdomains of larger institutions, so that band is likelier to be an enrichment miss than a genuine population of five-person contact centres.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/genesys-cloud-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Genesys Cloud Market Share Among Live Chat &amp; Messaging</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Genesys Cloud&apos;s market share? 0.07% of the Live Chat &amp; Messaging category, ranking 65th, as of September 2026. The profile previously claimed 2.51% and 8th place under the retired Genesys id; that framing has been removed. Both numbers mislead in the same way. A share of a live-chat category measures how many websites embed one particular widget, and this widget is a minor surface of a contact-centre platform whose real work &amp;mdash; inbound voice, routing, workforce management &amp;mdash; leaves no trace on a web page. The rank is a fact about chat embeds. It is not a ranking of Genesys.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/geodirectory-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use GeoDirectory? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use GeoDirectory the most? GeoDirectory adoption is globally distributed. The United States leads with the largest share, followed by India, the UK, and Australia. The plugin&apos;s broad geographic reach reflects its multilingual WordPress compatibility and the universal need for local business directories. Emerging markets show particularly strong representation, as small businesses and municipal governments build local listing platforms, based on our analysis of 1,262 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/geodirectory-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use GeoDirectory the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use GeoDirectory? The industry distribution is highly diverse, reflecting GeoDirectory&apos;s role as a general-purpose directory tool. IT services, construction, real estate, and advertising services appear among the top verticals. No single industry dominates above 10%, confirming GeoDirectory&apos;s horizontal appeal for any organization building location-based listing platforms, based on our enriched data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/geodirectory-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GeoDirectory Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use GeoDirectory? GeoDirectory serves predominantly small organizations. Micro-businesses (1-10 employees) make up the majority of users, consistent with the WordPress plugin&apos;s free entry point and self-hosted nature. Mid-sized companies and enterprises appear occasionally, typically running GeoDirectory as part of municipal or regional listing platforms, based on our analysis of 1,262 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/geodirectory-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GeoDirectory Market Share Among Forum &amp; Community</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is GeoDirectory&apos;s market share? GeoDirectory holds a 0.98% share of its category, ranking 6th among tracked technologies. The directory plugin market is fragmented, with no single solution dominating. GeoDirectory&apos;s positioning as a free WordPress plugin with premium add-ons gives it a different go-to-market from SaaS directory platforms, based on our analysis of 50M+ domains at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/getresponse-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use GetResponse? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use GetResponse the most? Poland leads with 1,170 enriched companies (32.2%), and that is the whole story of this platform in one number: no other technology in our Email Marketing category has Poland anywhere near the top, let alone in first place. The United States is second at 668 companies (18.4%), with Germany (292) and Italy (289) tied at 8.0%, then the United Kingdom (4.6%) and Spain (4.3%). Together, EU member states account for 60.3% of the enriched company base, and English-speaking markets for only 26.9%, reflecting GetResponse&apos;s Gdansk headquarters and historically strong EU presence. Percentages are shares of the 3,633 domains where we have a company country on file.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/getresponse-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use GetResponse the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Business Consulting and Services leads at 5.9% of GetResponse&apos;s enriched customer base, followed by Professional Training and Coaching (5.02%) and Retail (4.38%), with Advertising Services just behind at 4.35%. That mix tells a clear story: GetResponse&apos;s core users are consultants, coaches, and marketers who run email-driven businesses. IT Services (3.3%) and Wellness and Fitness (3.15%) add further weight to the knowledge-commerce and online coaching profile.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/getresponse-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GetResponse Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is GetResponse only for small businesses? Overwhelmingly, yes. Our analysis of 3,787 enriched companies shows 60.9% have 1-10 employees, and when combined with 11-50 employees, 87.0% are small businesses. That said, our detection data includes some genuinely large organizations: Grant Thornton&apos;s Polish practice, Selena Group, CUCKOO International, and Sinclair College all use GetResponse for specific marketing programs. These are departmental deployments, not company-wide platforms.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/getresponse-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GetResponse Market Share Among Email Marketing</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is GetResponse&apos;s market share? GetResponse holds 0.18% of the Email Marketing market, ranking #22 among tracked platforms based on our monthly crawl of 28.2M domains and 7,900+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. That puts it well behind category leaders like MailChimp (21.24%) and Klaviyo (16.78%). GetResponse claims 350,000+ customers in 183 countries (per its official about page), and Latka&apos;s SaaS database reports 100K paying customers. The gap between 7,315 detected domains and 100K+ customers means most users rely on email-only plans or subdomains that don&apos;t leave detectable footprints on public websites.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/getsitecontrol-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Getsitecontrol? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States leads with 1,075 of the companies we can place, and the United Kingdom is unusually close at 564 — roughly two to one, where the rest of this category runs six or eight to one. Then Australia (226), Canada (217) and Brazil (213). This is the most internationally balanced base in the category.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/getsitecontrol-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Getsitecontrol the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 6.55%, then Retail Apparel and Fashion at 2.93% and Hospitality at 2.87%. Commerce-weighted, but less sharply than Zotabox, and with hospitality appearing where the rest of the category shows agencies or publishers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/getsitecontrol-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Getsitecontrol Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>51.17% of the companies we can size have 10 employees or fewer, 27.77% have 11 to 50 and 12.12% have 51 to 200. That last band is roughly three times what Zotabox and BDOW show. Getsitecontrol reaches further up-market than the rest of this category, which is what being platform-agnostic buys you.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/getsitecontrol-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Getsitecontrol Market Share Among Popups &amp; Lead Capture</image:title>
      <image:caption>Getsitecontrol is eleventh of the 64 technologies in Popups &amp; Lead Capture at 2.1% of 427,401 domains. Its position in the ranking understates what it is: one script tag with no platform requirement, competing against plugins that only work on WordPress and apps that only work on Shopify. Its footprint is smaller but it is the only one of the four that can be installed anywhere.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ghost-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Ghost? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Ghost the most? The United States leads with 35.5% of companies whose country we know (1,505), followed by the United Kingdom at 10.5% (444), Germany at 5.6% (236), France at 4.1% and India at 3.9% (164). This concentration makes sense given Ghost&apos;s English-language origins and its appeal to tech-forward markets. English-speaking countries account for 52.7% of the base. India&apos;s presence in the top five is notable and unusual in this category; several of our largest Ghost detections are Indian technology companies running product blogs.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ghost-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Ghost the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads Ghost adoption at 8.99%, followed closely by Technology, Information and Internet at 8.04% and IT Services and IT Consulting at 7.00%. Combined, these three technology-adjacent sectors represent 24.03% of Ghost&apos;s user base, the highest technology concentration of any platform in this category, ahead of even Sanity. That signals strong product-market fit with engineering teams running developer blogs, changelogs and product newsletters.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ghost-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ghost Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Ghost only for small businesses? Almost entirely, and more so than any other platform in this category. 74.3% of Ghost users are micro-businesses with 1–10 employees, and another 17.68% have 11–50, 91.98% below fifty employees. What sets Ghost apart is the top end: just 2 organisations with 10,001+ employees run it, 0.04% of the base, and none of the fifty largest companies we detect on Ghost is a household-name multinational. Where every other platform here has some enterprise tail, Ghost genuinely does not. It is a platform for independent publishers, startups and small media teams, and the data says so unambiguously.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ghost-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ghost Market Share Among CMS &amp; Website Builders</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Ghost&apos;s market share? Ghost holds 0.06% of the CMS and website-builder category, ranking #50 of the 750 platforms we track in it. That looks modest against WordPress (64.17%), Wix (8.72%) or Squarespace (6.84%), but the comparison is the wrong one: Ghost is not competing to be a general website builder. Against the publishing- and developer-oriented platforms it actually overlaps with, it sits mid-pack, ahead of Prismic (8,120), DatoCMS (4,172), Contentful (3,892) and Strapi (2,847), behind Sanity (28,129) and roughly level with Storyblok (9,361).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/github-pages-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use GitHub Pages? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 9,023 matched organisations, or 32.54% of those with a known country. India follows at 9.93% (2,754), then the United Kingdom at 8.13% (2,254), Brazil at 4.64% and Canada at 4.50%. The Indian and Brazilian shares both run well above the corpus norm, which is characteristic of developer-adopted free tooling rather than enterprise procurement.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/github-pages-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use GitHub Pages the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 15.59%, followed by IT Services and IT Consulting (11.42%), Technology, Information and Internet (7.77%), Business Consulting and Services (2.94%) and Information Technology &amp; Services (2.54%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/github-pages-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GitHub Pages Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Organisations with 1 to 10 employees are 79.11% of matched companies and 11 to 50 a further 15.47%, so 94.58% have fewer than 50 staff. Companies above 1,000 employees account for 0.45%. GitHub Pages is free for public repositories, which removes the buying threshold that shapes commercial platform distributions.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/github-pages-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GitHub Pages Market Share Among PaaS</image:title>
      <image:caption>GitHub Pages holds 2.99% of the PaaS category and ranks 7th of 41 tracked technologies, behind Amazon Web Services (39.98%), Vercel (16.64%) and Netlify (6.60%). The category groups general-purpose cloud with specialist static hosting, and GitHub Pages serves only static sites published from a repository, so its share reflects a narrower remit rather than a competitive position.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/givewp-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use GiveWP? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use GiveWP the most?The United States leads with 53.43% of identified customers, followed by the United Kingdom (10.03%), India (5.99%), Australia (4.20%) and Canada (4.19%). Italy (3.74%), Spain (3.22%) and Germany (2.75%) give it a real European tail.That spread is wider than the US-dominated pattern we see across most fundraising software, and it follows from what GiveWP is: a self-hosted plugin has no country-by-country payment onboarding to complete before an organisation can install it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/givewp-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use GiveWP the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use GiveWP the most?Non-profit organisations lead at 30.86%, followed by civic and social organisations (8.32%), non-profit organisation management (4.94%) and religious institutions (4.68%). Taken together, close to half of all identified GiveWP organisations are explicitly charitable.That is an unusually pure signal. Most technologies we profile scatter across construction, IT services and retail, because most software is horizontal. GiveWP&apos;s distribution reads as a straight description of the product&apos;s purpose, which is the strongest evidence that its detections are what they claim to be.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/givewp-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GiveWP Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size organisations use GiveWP?Small ones, decisively. 67.93% of identified domains belong to organisations with 1-10 staff and another 21.57% have 11-50, so roughly nine in ten of the organisations we can identify have fewer than fifty people. Out of 20,707 identified organisations, only 58 have more than 10,000 staff.This is the clearest small-organisation skew we measure in any category, and it is the product working as designed: a plugin costs a licence rather than a percentage-plus-platform-fee contract, and a two-person charity can install one.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/givewp-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GiveWP Market Share Among Donations &amp; Fundraising</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is GiveWP&apos;s market share?GiveWP holds 28% of the donation and fundraising category and ranks #1 of the 54 tools we track. Second is Patreon on 21,307 domains, then Donorbox (6,565), Ko-fi (6,393) and Buy Me a Coffee (5,806).Read that ranking with the category&apos;s shape in mind. The tools below GiveWP are mostly hosted services that a creator or charity links out to, while GiveWP is software installed on a site the organisation already owns. They show up in the same category because they collect donations, but they are different purchases, and a small charity that wants donations to arrive on its own domain has few alternatives to a plugin.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/givewp-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GiveWP Usage Statistics 2020-2026: 31,478 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>How has GiveWP adoption changed over time?GiveWP first appears in our records in August 2020 on 1,693 domains and grows steadily through the following years, reaching 18,323 domains by April 2025. Our current crawl detects it on 31,478 domains, up from 27,614 in June 2026 and 30,828 in July.Counts either side of that gap are not a like-for-like series: the set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly discovered ones added, and our detection signals widen over time. Inside the current window growth is modest and steady at 2.1% between July and August 2026, which is what a mature plugin in a small category looks like.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/global-ai-business-adoption-rate-2017-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Global AI Business Adoption 2017-2024: From 20% to 72% in Seven Years</image:title>
      <image:caption>Global AI adoption in businesses jumped from 20 percent in 2017 to 72 percent in 2024 — a 3.6x expansion. The curve isn&apos;t smooth: 2020 (50%) and 2022 (50%) were both years of stalled or slight retreat, often attributed to budget uncertainty and the gap between early-experiment cohorts and broader rollout. The 17-point spike from 55% (2023) to 72% (2024) is the steepest single-year jump in the series — driven by generative AI moving from pilots into production functions. Cross-reference this with the deployed-vs-exploring gap by country: the 72% headline still hides large differences in how much of that AI use is actually in production.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/global-device-share-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Global Device Share of HTTP Requests in 2026: Desktop Leads at 59.11%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Cloudflare Radar data shows desktop generated 59.11% of global HTTP requests over the 90-day window from January 20 to April 20, 2026, with mobile at 40.86% and other devices at 0.03%. This contradicts session-weighted survey data that regularly places mobile above 60% — the difference reflects that request-weighted data structurally favors desktop, where a single session can trigger 10x more asset requests than a lean mobile visit.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/global-it-spending-total-2012-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Global IT Spending 2012-2026: $3.66T to Forecast $6.16T</image:title>
      <image:caption>Global IT spending nearly doubled from $3.66 trillion in 2012 to a forecast $6.16 trillion in 2026. The curve flattens through the 2013-2020 period before breaking upward in 2021 as enterprises shifted to cloud-heavy architectures; the 2024-2026 acceleration reflects AI-driven data center demand.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/global-mobile-share-90-day-trend-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Global Mobile HTTP Traffic Share Declined 2 pp Over 90 Days in Q1 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Global mobile share of HTTP requests fell from 41.47% (week of January 19) to 39.45% (week of April 20) — a 2.0 percentage point decline over 90 days. Desktop share correspondingly rose from 58.51% to 60.52%. The trend runs counter to the widely-cited narrative that mobile is linearly gaining ground; in request-weighted data, mobile has actually plateaued and slightly reversed in Q1 2026.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/global-privacy-control-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Global Privacy Control? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries support GPC the most? The United States leads GPC adoption, driven by CCPA compliance requirements that legally recognize the GPC signal. English-speaking markets (US, UK, Australia, Canada) dominate, followed by European markets where GDPR alignment makes GPC implementation attractive. The US concentration is higher than typical for privacy technologies, reflecting the California-specific legal mandate, based on our analysis of 74,372 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/global-privacy-control-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Global Privacy Control the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries implement GPC? GPC adoption is highly horizontal. No single industry dominates above 15%. Retail, technology, and media lead, but the signal appears across all sectors. This broad distribution confirms GPC&apos;s role as a baseline privacy technology rather than a vertical-specific compliance tool, based on our enriched data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/global-privacy-control-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Global Privacy Control Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies implement GPC? GPC adoption spans all company sizes, but micro-businesses (1-10 employees) make up the majority, based on our analysis of 74,372 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. This reflects GPC&apos;s nature as a server-side header that hosting platforms and CDNs can implement in bulk. Many small sites inherit GPC support from their infrastructure provider rather than configuring it individually.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/godaddy-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use GoDaddy? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use GoDaddy the most? Which countries use GoDaddy the most? The United States dominates with 53.3% of all enriched customers (51,095 companies), reflecting GoDaddy&apos;s American roots and marketing focus. The United Kingdom follows at 9.6% (9,188), then Germany at 8.0% (7,671) and India at 8.0% (7,646). Together, English-speaking countries account for over 65% of the user base, based on our enriched company data., based on our data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/godaddy-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use GoDaddy the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use GoDaddy? Construction is the top industry at 4.97%, followed by Business Consulting (4.31%) and IT Services (3.92%). The distribution is strikingly flat: no single industry exceeds 5%, making GoDaddy a genuinely horizontal platform that serves everyone from contractors and medical practices to restaurants and real estate agents, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/godaddy-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GoDaddy Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use GoDaddy? Is GoDaddy only for small businesses? Practically, yes. 84.9% of GoDaddy customers have 1-10 employees based on our analysis of 52,605 enriched companies, and 94.5% have fewer than 50 people. That makes GoDaddy one of the most micro-business-concentrated hosting platforms we track. Still, large organizations like PwC, Ford, Toyota, and the NBA use GoDaddy for specific subdomains and internal tools., based on our data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/godaddy-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GoDaddy Market Share Among Web Hosting</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is GoDaddy&apos;s market share? GoDaddy holds 45.04% of the web hosting category on 4,378,121 domains, ranking #1. The margin is the story: Hostinger is second at 12.26% and IONOS third at 6.56%, so GoDaddy is larger than the next three combined. Note that this measures detectable hosting signals, which favours providers whose infrastructure announces itself.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-ads-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Google Ads? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>United States leads global adoption of Google Ads with 12,499 active deployments. The country distribution highlights where Google Ads sees strongest market traction.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-ads-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Google Ads the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail is the industry with the highest share of Google Ads adoption, at 8.1% of all customers. The distribution reflects which sectors find Google Ads most useful.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-ads-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Ads Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>55.2% of Google Ads customers are companies with 1-10 employees. This distribution reveals which company segments rely on Google Ads most.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-ads-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Ads Market Share Among Ad Networks</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Google Ads&apos;s market share? The Google Ads tag holds 1.11% of the advertising networks category on 51,211 domains, ranking #13. That figure will look low against expectations, and the reason is definitional rather than substantive: Google&apos;s advertising instrumentation is split across several separately-detected technologies, and this row is one of them.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-adsense-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Google AdSense? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Google AdSense the most? The United States leads with 40,181 matched companies, followed by India (17,717) and Brazil (12,105). The United Kingdom (10,289), France (8,749) and Germany (7,407) come next, then Spain (5,504), Canada (4,764) and Italy (4,498). India placing second, ahead of every European market, is unusual for an ad product and fits a platform whose core users are small independent publishers. These are counts drawn from the 181,943 companies we could match, not from the full detected base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-adsense-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Google AdSense the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Technology, Information and Internet leads at 4.55%, with IT Services and IT Consulting (4.22%) and Advertising Services (4.12%) close behind. The telling part is further down the table: Online Audio and Video Media (2.85%), Book and Periodical Publishing (2.73%) and Media Production (2.35%) all make the top ten. Three media and publishing categories in ten is a shape no other ad tag in our data has. No industry clears 5%, so AdSense stays horizontal across a very long tail of publishers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-adsense-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google AdSense Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Google AdSense only for small sites? Mostly, yes. 72.6% of matched companies have 1-10 employees and another 18.4% have 11-50, so nine in ten sit under fifty people. Everything from 201 employees upward accounts for just 3.61%, and the 10,001+ bracket is 0.25%, or 421 companies. Large organisations do turn up: United Airlines, Intuit, Hertz and Veolia all serve AdSense code somewhere in their web estate, typically on a content section or microsite rather than the main domain. Shares describe the 181,943 matched companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-adsense-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google AdSense Market Share Among Ad Networks</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Google AdSense&apos;s market share? Google AdSense holds a 14.68% share of the Ad Networks category and ranks #2 of the 282 technologies we track there. DoubleClick Floodlight sits above it on 1,436,200 domains (31.1%), but the two do different jobs: Floodlight is an advertiser-side conversion tag, while AdSense fills publisher inventory, which makes AdSense the largest publisher-facing network in the category by domain count. Microsoft Advertising (344,173 domains) and Pinterest Ads (316,487) follow. Alphabet&apos;s Google Network segment, which includes AdSense, generated $29.79 billion in 2025 (Alphabet Q4 2025 earnings release). Rankings come from our monthly crawl.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-analytics-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Google Analytics? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Google Analytics the most? The United States leads with 1,950,816 domains, followed by the United Kingdom (515,743), Brazil (302,795), India (266,544), Australia (253,759) and Canada (250,579). What is notable is how flat the tail is — France (245,067), the Netherlands (233,612), Spain (208,840) and Germany (177,473) all sit within a narrow band. A tool this close to universal stops having a geographic profile of its own and simply mirrors where the web is.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-analytics-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Google Analytics the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use Google Analytics? Retail leads at 4.3% of enriched domains, followed by Construction (4.04%), IT Services and IT Consulting (3.39%), Real Estate (3.15%) and Advertising Services (3.03%). The distribution is the flattest on this site — no industry exceeds 4.5% — which is exactly what you would expect from a tool that has become default infrastructure. You find it in construction firms, medical practices and nonprofits as readily as in tech companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-analytics-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Analytics Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Google Analytics only for small businesses? Micro-businesses are the overwhelming majority. 63.23% of enriched Google Analytics domains belong to companies with 1-10 employees and another 23.72% to companies with 11-50, based on our analysis of 6,325,382 enriched companies. That said, the enterprise tier is real and deep: Tata Consultancy Services, Deloitte, IBM, Microsoft, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, AT&amp;T, Saudi Aramco and United Parcel Service all run it. With a base this size, even a small percentage of very large companies is tens of thousands of organisations.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-analytics-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Analytics Market Share Among Web Analytics</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Google Analytics&apos;s market share? Google Analytics holds a 64.26% share of the web analytics category, ranking #1 on 10,942,935 domains, based on our monthly crawl of 29.9M live domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. The gap is the story: its nearest measured rival is Cloudflare Browser Insights at 11.25%, which is not really a competing choice — Cloudflare enables it automatically for sites already on its network. After that the field drops away sharply to Site Kit (3.62%), WordPress.com Stats (2.63%) and Snowplow Analytics (2.23%). No deliberately-chosen alternative reaches 4%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-cloud-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Google Cloud? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 48.59% of enriched Google Cloud domains, the highest US concentration of the three large clouds: AWS sits at 41.76% and Azure at 29.99%. Part of that is a single large American cluster described in the industry section below. The United Kingdom (5.65%) and Brazil (5.64%) are effectively tied for second, and Japan at 3.08% ranks higher here than on either of the other two cloud profiles.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-cloud-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Google Cloud the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Read the Insurance row carefully. It is one customer, not 7,752. Insurance leads the table at 15.48%, more than double the next industry, and when we read the domains they are overwhelmingly individual State Farm agent websites, each a separate domain with its own company record. 96.7% of them are served from Google Cloud Storage on the same deployment.Remove that cohort and Insurance leaves the top ten altogether. The ranking becomes Software Development 7.49%, Technology and Internet 6.46%, IT Services 6.10%, Real Estate 4.49%. That second list is the better description of who builds on Google Cloud.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-cloud-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Cloud Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>90.55% of enriched Google Cloud domains belong to companies under 50 staff and 1.13% to companies above 1,000. We tested whether that was an artifact of the large small-business cluster on this list by recomputing it with that cohort removed, and it barely moved: 67.82% under ten staff becomes 66.80%. The skew is real, not a by-product of one customer&apos;s estate.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-cloud-quarterly-revenue-2020-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Cloud Quarterly Revenue Hit $24.8 Billion in Q2 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Google Cloud earned 24.8 billion U.S. dollars in the second quarter of 2026, up 82 percent year over year and an acceleration on Q1 2026&apos;s 63 percent. The segment has now grown in every quarter since Q1 2020 without a single sequential decline, and the first half of 2026 alone brought in more revenue than the whole of 2024.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-cloud-revenue-2017-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Cloud Revenue Reached $58.7 Billion in 2025</image:title>
      <image:caption>Google Cloud generated 58.7 billion U.S. dollars in 2025, up almost 36 percent on the previous year. The segment has grown more than fourteenfold since 2017, when it brought in just over 4 billion dollars, making it the fastest-compounding line item in Alphabet&apos;s reporting.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-font-api-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Google Font API? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States is 27.89% of the enriched companies we can place, then the United Kingdom 7.84%, Brazil 5.73%, India 5.60% and France 4.75%. Germany is eleventh at 3.28%, behind the Netherlands and Spain, which is not where Europe&apos;s largest economy normally sits in a web technology table. That gap is the most interesting number on this page and it is covered below.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-font-api-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Google Font API the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>There is no dominant vertical, which is the point. Construction leads at 4.18%, then IT Services and IT Consulting 3.85%, Retail 3.70%, Business Consulting 3.23% and Real Estate 3.16%. Nothing reaches 5%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-font-api-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Font API Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>66.07% of the companies we can size have 10 employees or fewer and 22.35% have 11 to 50. A free CDN link with no account, no key and no bill has no reason to skew large, and it does not. The 9,544 companies above 10,000 employees are a rounding error against a base of 5.9 million sized companies, and most of them appear through a secondary property rather than a main site.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-font-api-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Font API Market Share Among Font Services</image:title>
      <image:caption>Google Fonts holds 56.03% of the Font Services category, first of 24. The runner-up, Font Awesome at 29.66%, is an icon set rather than a typeface service, as are Twemoji, Bootstrap Icons and Ionicons. Counting only actual webfont services, Google holds roughly 88% of that market, Adobe Fonts about 10%, and nobody else reaches 3%. This is the least contested position we publish.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-forms-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Google Forms? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Google Forms the most? The United States leads with 37.5% of all enriched companies, but Google Forms reaches 40+ countries. India comes in second at 12.3%, followed by the United Kingdom (4.3%) and Brazil (4.2%). English-speaking countries make up roughly 45% of the user base. Latin America and South Asia show strong adoption too, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-forms-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Google Forms the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Non-profit Organizations lead at 4.39%, followed by IT Services (3.83%) and Software Development (3.18%). The distribution is remarkably flat: no single industry exceeds 5%. That makes Google Forms one of the most horizontally adopted form tools in our database. Education-related verticals (Education Administration, Higher Education) combine for nearly 5%, reflecting the tool&apos;s deep roots in academic settings, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-forms-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Forms Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Google Forms only for small businesses? Mostly. 79.1% of Google Forms customers have 1-10 employees, based on our analysis of 6,365 enriched companies. That&apos;s a higher micro-business concentration than most form builders. But it&apos;s not exclusively small: MIT, UNDP, Publicis Groupe, and the Toronto District School Board all use it. The tool wins on being free and frictionless, even inside large organizations.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-forms-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Forms Market Share Among Form Builders</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Google Forms&apos; market share? Google Forms holds 0.32% of the Form Builders market, ranking #9 in the category. That&apos;s well behind WordPress-native plugins like WPForms (10.21%) and Gravity Forms (6.76%), based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. The low detectable share is misleading, though. Most Google Forms embeds live on Google&apos;s own infrastructure, not on customer domains.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-iaas-market-share-2017-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google&apos;s Share of the Global IaaS Market Nearly Tripled Since 2017</image:title>
      <image:caption>Google held 9.0 percent of the global infrastructure as a service market in 2024, up from 3.3 percent in 2017. Its share has risen in every single year of the period without exception — the only one of the top three vendors that can claim an unbroken climb. Amazon fell from 51.8 to 37.7 percent over the same years while Microsoft rose from 13.3 to 23.9 percent.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-maps-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Google Maps? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Google Maps the most? The United States dominates with 332,829 companies (28.06%). Brazil is second at 89,414 (7.54%), ahead of the United Kingdom at 85,611 (7.22%) and India at 67,932 (5.73%). Spain, Germany, Australia, Canada and France each contribute between 3% and 4.3%. Brazil&apos;s second place is the standout and reflects the size of its small-business web presence.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-maps-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Google Maps the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Construction leads at 5.17%, followed by Retail (4.76%), Medical Practices (4.74%) and Real Estate (4.37%). The distribution is unusually flat: no single industry exceeds 6%, making Google Maps one of the most horizontally adopted technologies we measure. What the leaders share is not a sector but a requirement that a customer physically arrive somewhere.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-maps-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Maps Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Google Maps only for small businesses? Mostly, yes. 65.36% of Google Maps companies have 1-10 employees and 88.4% have fewer than 50, based on 1,082,128 companies with a published size band. The embed is overwhelmingly a small-business tool. Enterprise users above 10,001 employees are just 0.17% of the base, but that is still 1,794 organisations, including Bank of America, FedEx, Kaiser Permanente and State Farm.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-maps-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Maps Market Share Among Maps &amp; Geolocation</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Google Maps&apos; market share? Google Maps holds 77.9% of the Maps &amp; Geolocation category and ranks #1 of 66 tracked technologies, on 1,782,166 domains. Leaflet is a distant second at 232,303 (10.15%), making Google roughly 7.7x its nearest competitor and larger than the whole remainder of the category several times over. Very few categories we measure are this one-sided.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-maps-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Maps Usage Statistics 2005-2026: 1.8M Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Google Maps detection runs from 5 domains in July 2005 through 137,268 in January 2015 and 855,808 in January 2020, to a recorded peak of 2.72 million in March 2025. It currently stands at 1,782,166 and has risen in each of the last three months. Because the crawled domain population turns over every month, with dead domains dropping out and newly registered ones coming in, comparisons across long spans reflect that turnover as well as changes in adoption.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-pay-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Google Pay? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries show a Google Pay marker most? The United States leads at 44.1%, followed by the United Kingdom at 17.5% — the highest UK share of the six payment profiles — then Australia at 9.3%, Canada at 8.0% and Germany at 6.2%, across 168,509 enriched companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-pay-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Google Pay the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 18.51%, with Retail Apparel &amp; Fashion at 9.69%, Manufacturing at 3.78%, Food &amp; Beverage at 3.74% and Wellness &amp; Fitness at 2.93% — within a fifth of a point of Visa, Mastercard and Amex on every line, because the same storefronts carry all four markers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-pay-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Pay Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>78.7% of companies with a Google Pay marker have 1-10 employees — the steepest small-business skew of the six — with 16.22% at 11-50 and 3.65% at 51-200. The curve belongs to Shopify&apos;s merchant base rather than to Google Pay&apos;s user base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-pay-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Pay Market Share Among Payment Processing</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Google Pay&apos;s market share? Google Pay holds 9.33% of the Payment Processing category with 768,809 domains, ranking 7th. The number counts checkout markup, not wallet transactions. Its top seven entries — PayPal, Apple Pay, Shop Pay, Visa, Mastercard, American Express and Google Pay — account for 89.09% of all 8.24 million domains in Payment Processing, and are very largely the same Shopify storefronts counted seven times. Stripe, the processor actually moving the money on most of them, ranks 8th at 2.62%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-tag-manager-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Google Tag Manager? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Google Tag Manager the most? The United States dominates with 32.0% of enriched customers, but Google Tag Manager&apos;s footprint is genuinely global, spanning well over 100 countries. The United Kingdom (8.5%) and Brazil (5.2%) follow, with India, Australia, Canada, and France each near 4%. Together the main English-speaking markets (US, UK, Canada, Australia) account for roughly 49% of the enriched user base, based on our company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-tag-manager-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Google Tag Manager the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use Google Tag Manager? Retail is the dominant industry at 4.31%, followed closely by Construction (4.01%) and IT Services and IT Consulting (3.39%). The long tail is significant, no single industry exceeds 4.4%, making Google Tag Manager a genuinely horizontal platform serving every vertical from consulting to restaurants, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-tag-manager-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Tag Manager Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Google Tag Manager? Micro-businesses are its overwhelming core. With 62.4% of Google Tag Manager customers having 1-10 employees, and another 24.0% in the 11-50 band, based on our analysis of nearly 6 million enriched companies, the platform dominates the smallest business segment. Yet enterprise clients including Tata Sons, Amazon, IBM, Bank of America, and DHL prove Google Tag Manager scales from solo founders to Fortune 500 operations, based on our data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-tag-manager-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Tag Manager Market Share Among Tag Management</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Google Tag Manager&apos;s market share? Google Tag Manager holds a 98.51% share of the tag management market, ranking #1 in the category by a wide margin. Its nearest competitors sit far behind: Adobe Experience Platform Launch (0.73%), Tealium (0.27%), and Matomo Tag Manager (0.22%). This near-total dominance reflects GTM&apos;s free pricing and tight integration with the wider Google marketing stack, based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-translate-api-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Google Translate API? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Google Translate API the most? The United States leads with 24,992 companies (32.1%) of enriched profiles, followed by the United Kingdom at 7,512 (9.6%). Brazil and Spain rank third and fourth with 5,270 and 5,072 companies respectively. India rounds out the top five with 4,490 companies. Unlike many US-dominated SaaS tools, Google Translate API shows strong adoption across non-English-speaking markets, with Brazil, Spain, Germany, France, and Italy all ranking in the top eight.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-translate-api-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Google Translate API the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Real Estate dominates the industry breakdown at 10.03% of enriched companies, more than double the next-largest vertical. This makes sense: property listings need multilingual support for international buyers, and Google Translate API is the quickest way to add automated translations. Education (Primary/Secondary and Administration combined) accounts for 6.79%, reflecting schools and districts serving multilingual communities. Government Administration at 2.91% underscores the API&apos;s adoption by public-sector organizations that must provide services in multiple languages.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-translate-api-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Translate API Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Google Translate API only for small businesses? The data shows a clear small-business skew, but it&apos;s not exclusive. 74.5% of companies using Google Translate API have 1-10 employees, and when combined with the 11-50 bracket, 86.9% are small businesses. However, the 10,001+ employee segment accounts for 760 companies (1.03%), including major enterprises like Boeing, Medtronic, and Schneider Electric. The API&apos;s generous free tier (500,000 characters per month) makes it accessible to solo developers and small teams, while the pay-as-you-go pricing at $20 per million characters scales for enterprise usage.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-translate-api-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Translate API Market Share Among Translation &amp; Localization</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Google Translate API&apos;s market share? Google Translate API holds 3.37% of the Translation &amp; Localization market, ranking #10 overall in the category. That ranking is slightly misleading, though, because many tools above it (like hreflang tags and meta language declarations) aren&apos;t active translation services. Among actual translation APIs and widget-based services, Google Translate API is effectively the #1 provider by domain count, with 158,303 active domains tracked by TechnologyChecker.io across our monthly crawl of 29.6M domains.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-workspace-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Google Workspace? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Google Workspace most? The United States accounts for 43.39% of enriched domains, then the United Kingdom (7.78%), India (6.11%), Canada (4.97%), Australia (4.21%) and Brazil (4.09%). That spread is wider than most business software we track, which fits a product sold self-serve by credit card rather than through country sales teams.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-workspace-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Google Workspace the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>No single industry dominates, which is itself the finding. Advertising Services leads on 4.54%, then Business Consulting (3.81%), IT Services (3.67%) and Software Development (3.57%). Nothing else clears 3.5%. Email is horizontal infrastructure, so the distribution looks like the distribution of small businesses generally rather than a vertical Google has won.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-workspace-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Workspace Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Google Workspace for small businesses? Overwhelmingly. 70.51% of domains belong to companies with 1 to 10 staff and another 21.22% to companies with 11 to 50, from 2,649,059 enriched companies. Under 2% employ more than 200. Uber, Airbnb, Randstad and G4S are all here, but they are the exception in a base built on very small organisations.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/google-workspace-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Google Workspace Market Share Among Email &amp; Webmail</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Google Workspace&apos;s market share? It holds 43.91% of the email and webmail market and ranks #2 of 25, behind Microsoft 365 on 45.33%. The pair control 89.24% between them. Third place is Apple iCloud Mail at 4.2%, which is a consumer product appearing on business domains, so the real contest has exactly two entrants. Figures come from our crawl at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gorgias-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Gorgias? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Gorgias the most? The United States leads at 53.3%. Australia comes in second at 11.2%, punching well above its weight given it&apos;s only 1-2% of global internet traffic. The UK (9.9%) and Canada (5.9%) follow. France at 2.9% is the only non-English market in the top five, likely because Gorgias was co-founded by Romain Lapeyre, who&apos;s French. English-speaking countries account for over 80% of the user base, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gorgias-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Gorgias the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 16.4%, and Retail Apparel and Fashion sits right behind at 13.1%. Those two alone are 29.5%. Add wellness, personal care, food and beverage, sporting goods, and luxury goods, and consumer-facing verticals cross 47% of all Gorgias customers. That&apos;s not a horizontal helpdesk. It&apos;s a tool for brands that ship physical products to people&apos;s doorsteps. No single vertical exceeds 17%, so it&apos;s not a one-industry tool either, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gorgias-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Gorgias Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Gorgias only for small businesses? Mostly, yes. 62.6% of Gorgias customers have 1-10 employees, and another 25% have 11-50, based on our analysis of 9,688 enriched companies. That&apos;s 87.6% with 50 or fewer employees. But the long tail includes recognisable retail names like Forever 21, Tupperware, Toys R Us and Canva, generally running Gorgias on a storefront rather than across company-wide support operations.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gorgias-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Gorgias Market Share Among Live Chat &amp; Messaging</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Gorgias&apos;s market share? Gorgias holds 0.77% of the live chat category on 22,757 domains, ranking #17 — and the number is close to meaningless without its context. Gorgias sells an ecommerce helpdesk built around Shopify, and its industry concentration proves the focus: retail and fashion are 32.7% of its domains. It is not competing for the general live chat market that WhatsApp and Tawk.to occupy.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/government-ai-readiness-index-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Government AI Readiness Index 2025: US Leads at 87.2</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States tops the 2025 Government AI Readiness Index with a score of 87.2, followed by the United Kingdom (77.64), France (77.27), the Netherlands (75.57), and China (75.55). The index measures a government&apos;s capacity to implement AI across public services — healthcare, education, transportation, and administration. The US lead of nearly 10 points over #2 is the largest gap in the top 15.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/greenhouse-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Greenhouse? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Greenhouse the most? The United States accounts for 505 companies, 85.4% of the enriched base — the most US-concentrated technology in this refresh batch. The United Kingdom (21) and Canada (13) follow, and nothing else reaches five. Greenhouse&apos;s structured-hiring methodology, with scorecards and interview kits, grew out of the US technology hiring culture of the 2010s, and the detected footprint suggests it has travelled very little beyond it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/greenhouse-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Greenhouse the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>This table needs a caveat before it needs a reading. Veterinary Services appears to lead at 11.62%, but those 64 domains are one veterinary practice group&apos;s clinic fleet, not a sector adopting Greenhouse. They share a near-identical stack — WordPress on 98.4%, Google Tag Manager on 98.4%, and the UserWay accessibility widget on 96.9% — which is a corporate template deployed across clinic sites that recruit centrally. Excluding it, Software Development leads at 7.8%, followed by IT Services (5.26%), Technology and Internet (4.9%), Hospitals and Health Care (4.9%) and Financial Services (4.17%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/greenhouse-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Greenhouse Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Greenhouse? 11-50 employees is the largest band at 34.53%, followed by 51-200 (28.21%) and 1-10 (22.56%), based on 591 enriched companies. Roughly 14.7% employ more than 200 people, and just 0.17% exceed 10,000. Structured interviewing — the practice Greenhouse encodes — becomes valuable once a company hires often enough for consistency to matter, which is the 11-200 range where two-thirds of this base sits.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/greenhouse-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Greenhouse Market Share Among HR &amp; Recruitment</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Greenhouse&apos;s market share? Greenhouse holds 1.16% of the HR &amp; Recruitment category on 716 domains, ranking #14 of 77. The HR &amp; Recruitment category is partitioned by payroll jurisdiction rather than genuinely contested: WP Job Openings (19,192 domains) is a free WordPress plugin with no HR system behind it, Rippling (7,983) is 78.3% United States, Personio (2,330) is 76.3% German and Teamtailor (3,600) is 47.7% Nordic. Greenhouse&apos;s genuine comparison is Lever (1,845 domains), the other US growth-stage applicant tracking system, which our detection currently finds on more than twice as many domains. Both sit alongside payroll platforms rather than competing with them. Note also that our count captures only customers whose job board is on their own domain.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gsap-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use GSAP? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>United States leads global adoption of GSAP with 537,130 active deployments. The country distribution highlights where GSAP sees strongest market traction.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gsap-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use GSAP the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Construction is the industry with the highest share of GSAP adoption, at 4.5% of all customers. The distribution reflects which sectors find GSAP most useful.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gsap-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GSAP Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>65.3% of GSAP customers are companies with 1-10 employees. This distribution reveals which company segments rely on GSAP most.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/gsap-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>GSAP Market Share Among JavaScript Libraries</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is GSAP&apos;s market share? GSAP holds a 3.17% share of the JavaScript libraries market, ranking #9, based on our monthly crawl of 29.9M live domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. The rows above it are near-universal utilities rather than rivals — jQuery (18.51%), core-js (12.13%), jQuery Migrate (9.86%), jQuery UI (5.64%) and Swiper (4.83%). GSAP is the highest-ranked library in the category that does one specialised job, which makes 2,687,296 domains a more impressive number than the rank alone suggests.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/handlebars-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Handlebars? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Where do companies use Handlebars? The United States leads with 39,273 domains, followed by the United Kingdom (6,976), Germany (4,719), Canada (4,630), Australia (3,808) and Spain (3,487). The US share is unusually dominant — better than five to one over the next market — which fits a library that spread through the Node.js and Express ecosystem rather than through a hosted platform with its own geographic footprint.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/handlebars-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Handlebars the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use Handlebars? Real Estate leads at 8.8% of enriched Handlebars domains, almost tied with Retail at 8.51%, then Retail Apparel and Fashion (3.07%), Insurance (1.94%) and Food and Beverage Services (1.77%). That top-two concentration is much sharper than the flat spreads elsewhere in this category — property listings and product catalogues are exactly the repeated-structure, data-driven pages a logic-less template engine is built for.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/handlebars-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Handlebars Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Handlebars only for small businesses? By domain count it mostly is: 64.99% of enriched Handlebars domains belong to companies with 1-10 employees and 20.74% to companies with 11-50. The enterprise presence is real but small in share — PwC, Bank of America, HSBC, Allianz, SAP, Microsoft, Siemens, AstraZeneca and Novo Nordisk all run Handlebars on production domains, and organisations with 10,001+ employees hold a low single-digit percentage of domains. Both facts matter: the volume is small teams, the weight is a handful of very large ones.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/handlebars-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Handlebars Market Share Among JavaScript Libraries</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Handlebars&apos;s market share? Handlebars holds a 0.25% share of the JavaScript libraries market, ranking #40, based on our monthly crawl of 29.9M live domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. That rank is lower than its reputation suggests, and the reason is the category it sits in: jQuery (18.51%), core-js (12.13%) and jQuery Migrate (9.86%) ship on a large fraction of the entire web. Handlebars is a specialised templating engine measured against universal utilities. Its closest true peer is Mustache, which it extends.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hbm-revenue-share-of-dram-2023-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>HBM Revenue Share of DRAM: 8% in 2023 to 30% in 2025</image:title>
      <image:caption>High-bandwidth memory (HBM) captured 30 percent of DRAM revenue in 2025 on just 10 percent of output. That is a 3x revenue-per-bit premium over standard DRAM. Revenue share quadrupled from 8 percent in 2023 — faster adoption than any DRAM generational shift in the past two decades.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hcaptcha-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use hCaptcha? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use hCaptcha the most? hCaptcha has the most European customer base of any major CAPTCHA provider. The United States accounts for just 27.2% of enriched customers, the lowest US share in this category, followed by Germany (11.5%), the United Kingdom (8.9%) and France (8.7%), with the Netherlands (3.7%), Canada (3.6%), Australia (3.5%) and Brazil (3.1%) behind, spread across 195 countries in total. English-speaking markets are only 43.2% of the base. Germany and France together nearly match the United States, which no other product here comes close to, and it is the clearest evidence that the privacy-first positioning is doing real commercial work under GDPR.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hcaptcha-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use hCaptcha the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use hCaptcha? The spread is broad and flat, with no industry above 6%. Retail leads at 5.98%, followed by Construction (4.07%), IT Services and IT Consulting (3.5%), Business Consulting and Services (2.68%), Retail Apparel and Fashion (2.59%) and Software Development (2.35%). Retail plus Retail Apparel and Fashion together reach 8.57%, and that concentration is not accidental: hCaptcha is the challenge that ships inside Shopify&apos;s checkout, which puts it on a large number of online stores by default rather than by deliberate selection.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hcaptcha-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>hCaptcha Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is hCaptcha only for large enterprises? No, and the distribution says the opposite of what the notable-companies list suggests. 64.9% of hCaptcha companies have 1-10 employees and 86.6% have 50 or fewer, while only 0.38% employ more than 10,000, based on our analysis of 63,299 enriched companies. The recognisable names further down this page are the top of a very long tail, not the centre of it. That shape is what a free tier of 100K requests a month produces: broad adoption among small sites that want bot protection without Google&apos;s data collection, with an enterprise business layered on top.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hcaptcha-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>hCaptcha Market Share Among Bot Detection &amp; CAPTCHA</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is hCaptcha&apos;s market share? hCaptcha holds a 3.44% share of the bot detection and CAPTCHA market, ranking #4 of 32 tracked products, based on our monthly crawl of 28.2M domains at TechnologyChecker.io. Ahead of it sit reCAPTCHA (65.26%), Cloudflare Bot Management (26.04%) and Cloudflare Turnstile (3.68%). The gap to Turnstile is now only 12,329 domains and closing, having been far wider a year ago. That is the number to watch: hCaptcha and Turnstile make almost the same pitch, privacy-first verification without Google, and they are separated by less than a quarter of a point of share.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/healow-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Healow? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Healow the most? The United States dominates with 98.5% of all customers, reflecting the platform&apos;s focus on U.S. Healthcare regulations (HIPAA, Meaningful Use). Only 4 countries have detected usage, making Healow one of the most geographically concentrated platforms we track at TechnologyChecker.io. The 2 UK detections and single Puerto Rico detection are outliers. This is a U.S.-only platform in practice.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/healow-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Healow the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries use Healow? Medical Practices dominate at 63.75%, followed by Hospitals and Health Care (26.54%). The long tail is minimal, 90% of customers are in healthcare verticals, making Healow one of the most industry-specific platforms we track at TechnologyChecker.io. Wellness services (3.2%), mental health care (0.65%), and nonprofits (0.65%) account for most of the remaining 10%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/healow-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Healow Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Healow only for small medical practices? Small practices are the core, 67.2% of Healow customers have 1-10 employees, based on our analysis of 403 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. Another 19.4% have 11-50 employees, meaning 86.6% are small independent practices. However, enterprise health systems like Intermountain Health (10,001+ employees) prove the platform scales to large hospital networks as well.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/healow-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Healow Market Share Among Live Chat &amp; Messaging</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Healow&apos;s market share? Healow holds a 1.7% share of the chatbots market, ranking #10 in the category. A niche player behind Smooch (21.74%) and Say what (14.23%), based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. Healow is categorized among chatbots due to its AI-powered patient engagement features, but it functions more as a healthcare-specific patient portal and scheduling platform.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/heap-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Heap? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States dominates Heap&apos;s customer base at 68.6% (3,821 companies), a concentration well above the typical 50-55% US share seen in many SaaS categories. The United Kingdom follows at 5.4% (351 companies), with Australia at 4.6% (301 companies) and Canada at 3.6% (237 companies). English-speaking markets together account for over 82% of all Heap customers. European adoption remains modest, with France (71), Netherlands (59), and Germany (52) showing limited penetration. Poland (42) and Brazil (39) round out the top regions, suggesting early-stage international expansion.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/heap-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Heap the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 9.23% (521 companies), confirming Heap&apos;s positioning as a product analytics tool favored by tech teams. Construction (5.33%) and Technology, Information and Internet (5.33%) tie for second place, followed by Insurance (15.05%) and Non-profit Organizations (3.49%). Unlike many analytics tools, Heap shows unusually broad industry distribution. No single vertical exceeds 9%, and the top 10 industries together account for less than 43% of the total base. This points to a genuinely horizontal platform.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/heap-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Heap Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Heap&apos;s customer base is dominated by small businesses. 64.6% of companies using Heap have 1-10 employees, and adding the 11-50 range brings that to 81.8% with fewer than 50 employees. This is somewhat unexpected for a product analytics platform that prices at enterprise levels. The likely explanation: many of the 1-10 employee detections are early-stage startups and product-led growth companies that adopt Heap during their growth phase. At the enterprise end, 122 companies with 10,001+ employees use Heap, representing 1.83% of the enriched base, and including names like Northwestern Mutual, Liberty Mutual and Carrier.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/heap-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Heap Market Share Among Product Analytics</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Heap&apos;s market share?Heap holds 3.73% of the product analytics category and ranks #5 of the 16 tools we track, on 9,803 domains, behind PostHog (45.59%), Amplitude (28.08%), Mixpanel (10.5%) and Pendo (6.65%). Heap was acquired by Contentsquare in 2023, and its detected base is the smallest of the five while being by far the most vertical: insurance alone accounts for 15.05% of the companies we can identify behind its domains.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/heap-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Heap Usage Statistics 2013-2026: 9,803 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>How has Heap adoption changed over time?Heap first appears in our records in April 2013 on 3 domains and reaches 9,992 by March 2025. Our current crawl detects it on 9,803 domains, up from 8,142 in June 2026 and 8,957 in July.Counts across that gap are not like-for-like, because the set of domains we crawl turns over every month, with dead sites dropping out and newly discovered ones added, and our detection signals widen over time. Heap is the one product in this category whose current figure sits close to its earlier high rather than well above it, and inside the current window it is growing 9.4% a month.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hello-bar-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Hello Bar? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries rely on Hello Bar the most? The United States leads with 1,570 of the enriched companies we can place, followed by the United Kingdom (245), Canada (167), India (163) and Brazil (146).An earlier version of this section described Brazil as a close second at 28.4% of customers. On current data Brazil is fifth and accounts for a small share; the US lead is decisive.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hello-bar-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Hello Bar the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries adopt Hello Bar most frequently? Retail leads at 4.59%, followed by Advertising Services (4.14%), Wellness and Fitness Services (3.44%) and Software Development (3.44%).No industry passes 5%. Hello Bar is a general-purpose notification bar rather than a vertical product, and the table reflects that.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hello-bar-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Hello Bar Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Hello Bar mainly a small business tool? Yes. 57.8% of the 3,266 enriched companies employ 10 people or fewer and another 26.06% employ 11-50, so roughly 84% are under 50 people. About 5.4% employ more than 200.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hello-bar-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Hello Bar Market Share Among Popups &amp; Lead Capture</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Hello Bar&apos;s current market position? Hello Bar holds a 1.24% share of the popup and lead capture category and ranks #15 of the 60 tools we track. Popup Maker leads at 27.32%, followed by POWR (12.52%), Privy (8.85%) and Mailmunch (8.19%).An earlier version of this page ranked Hello Bar against a mobile app-install meta tag rather than a popup tool. That row is not part of this comparison.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hello-bar-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Hello Bar Usage Statistics 2010-2026: 5.3K Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>How has Hello Bar&apos;s adoption changed over time? Our long-run detection history runs from November 2010 to a peak of 12,188 active domains in March 2025. Our current live crawl detects 5,318, up from 4,792 when that measurement began in June 2026.Those two numbers come from different measurement systems and the gap between them - roughly 0.39x across the join - is the largest in this batch. It should not be read as Hello Bar losing seven thousand sites. What we can say from a single consistent measurement is narrower: Hello Bar has added domains in each month of the live series, and it is the smallest of the long-established tools in its category.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/helpcenter-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use HelpCenter? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries adopt HelpCenter the most? The United States dominates with 48.2% of all customers (80 companies), followed by Australia at 10.8% (18 companies) and Canada at 7.2% (12 companies), based on our analysis of 170 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. These three markets account for two-thirds of adoption, reflecting mature e-commerce spaces where self-service support is standard. European adoption is growing, the UK (6%), France (4.2%), and Germany (3.6%), but emerging markets show minimal presence. The 52% non-US adoption rate is higher than typical US-based SaaS, suggesting the product found traction among international Shopify stores.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/helpcenter-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use HelpCenter the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries rely on HelpCenter most? Direct-to-consumer retail dominates. Retail leads at 17.5% (24 companies), followed by Retail Apparel and Fashion (9.5%) and Manufacturing (8.8%), based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io. Add Personal Care Product Manufacturing (5.1%) and Sporting Goods (3.7%), and 38% of customers sell physical products to consumers, primarily through Shopify stores. What&apos;s missing is telling: no SaaS companies, no financial services, no healthcare providers. HelpCenter isn&apos;t a general-purpose knowledge base; it&apos;s a DTC e-commerce support tool.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/helpcenter-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>HelpCenter Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use HelpCenter? HelpCenter shows extreme micro-business concentration. 80.4% of customers have 1-10 employees (135 companies), with another 13.1% in the 11-50 range, based on our analysis of 170 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. No customers exceed 500 employees in our dataset. This positions HelpCenter as a &quot;starter tool&quot; for founder-led businesses rather than an SMB platform. The 94% churn rate (1,765 previously-used vs. 101 active) suggests companies outgrow single-feature knowledge bases as they scale past 20-50 employees and consolidate into helpdesk suites.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/helpcenter-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>HelpCenter Market Share Among Documentation &amp; Knowledge Base</image:title>
      <image:caption>What&apos;s HelpCenter&apos;s actual market position? HelpCenter commands 1.19% of the Knowledge Base market and ranks as the category leader with 101 active installations, based on our crawl of over 50 million domains at TechnologyChecker.io. Context matters here: the Knowledge Base category is small and specialized, with only 172 total detections across all tracked technologies. The platform&apos;s nearest competitor, MyKnowledgeBase, holds 0.6% market share with 51 domains. Many businesses skip standalone knowledge bases entirely, opting instead for helpdesk suites like Zendesk or Intercom that bundle documentation with ticketing and live chat.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/heroku-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Heroku? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Heroku the most? Of the 476 domains matched to a company record, 272 are in the United States, 34 in the United Kingdom and 26 in Canada, followed by Australia with 20 and France with 11. Below that every country is in single digits: Spain and Sweden have 7 each, India 6, Italy and Mexico 5, then Switzerland, the Netherlands, Norway, Colombia and Brazil with 4 apiece. At those sizes one company estate moves a country several places, so use the ordering at the top and ignore the gaps further down.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/heroku-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Heroku the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 10.84% of industry-resolved domains, which is 48 of them. Then Advertising Services (34, 7.67%), Technology, Information and Internet (32, 7.22%) and Professional Training and Coaching (32, 7.22%). The counts are the honest unit here. No industry on this page is backed by more than fifty domains, so each percentage describes a few dozen companies, and small differences between adjacent rows mean nothing at all.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/heroku-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Heroku Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Heroku only for small companies? Largely, yes. Of the 467 matched domains with an employee band, 260 (55.67%) sit in the 1-10 bracket and another 119 (25.48%) in 11-50, so four in five are under fifty people. The enterprise end is thin enough to count by hand: 6 domains at companies of 10,001+ employees, 3 at 5,001-10,000 and 9 at 1,001-5,000. Those bands include honda.com, harvard.edu and northwestern.edu, and a detection there is one hostname inside a very large estate, not a company-wide standard.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/heroku-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Heroku Market Share Among PaaS</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Heroku&apos;s market share? It holds 0.03% of the PaaS category and ranks #23 of 41 ranked technologies in it. The scale gap is the whole story: Amazon Web Services is detected on 936,363 domains (39.98%) and Vercel on 389,653 (16.64%), against Heroku&apos;s 675. Read the ranking with one caveat. Every row in this category is found with a different instrument, and Heroku&apos;s is among the narrowest here, so the position understates the platform relative to rows detected from signals that are harder to hide. That caveat might be worth a few places in the ranking. It is not worth the gap between 675 domains and 936,363.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hetzner-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Hetzner? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Hetzner the most? Germany dominates at 63.2% (7,273 companies), which is one of the strongest single-country concentrations of any host we profile. Austria adds 4.47% and Switzerland 1.62%, giving a DACH total of 69.3%. The United States is second overall at 4.81% and Finland appears at 1.37%, tracking Hetzner&apos;s Helsinki region.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hetzner-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Hetzner the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 9.05%, followed by Software Development at 6.37% and Business Consulting at 4.91%. Adding Technology/Internet (3.39%) and Information Technology &amp; Services (2.26%), technical trades account for more than a fifth of the matched base, a far higher concentration than mass-market hosts record. Construction (3.4%) and Retail (3.33%) make up the non-technical tail.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hetzner-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Hetzner Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Hetzner only for small businesses? Very largely, yes. 68.29% of Hetzner companies have 1-10 employees and 21.53% have 11-50, so 89.8% are under 50 staff, based on 9,805 companies with a published size band. Above 1,000 employees there are only 81 companies in the entire matched set. Hetzner&apos;s unmanaged, price-led product is bought by technically self-sufficient teams rather than through enterprise procurement.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hetzner-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Hetzner Market Share Among Web Hosting</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Hetzner&apos;s market share? Hetzner holds a 0.2% share of the global web hosting category and ranks #25 of 70, on 19,374 domains, against GoDaddy at 45.04% and Hostinger at 12.26%. That global comparison is not the useful one. With 63.2% of its matched companies in Germany, Hetzner is best measured against the German market, where it is the #7 host we detect, behind IONOS (219,147 German domains), ALL-INKL (97,854), GoDaddy (84,875), Plesk (21,639), Mittwald (21,054) and One.com (11,109).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/highest-earning-creators-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Highest-Earning Content Creators 2025: MrBeast Tops at $85 Million</image:title>
      <image:caption>MrBeast (Jimmy Donaldson) was the highest-earning creator worldwide in 2025 with an estimated $85 million, ahead of Dhar Mann ($56 million) and a tie between Jake Paul and Matt Rife ($50 million each). The ranking shows how a small group of top creators now command earnings rivaling traditional celebrities.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/highest-roi-social-platforms-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Highest-ROI Social Media Platforms 2025: Facebook Tops at 54% of Marketers</image:title>
      <image:caption>During a September 2025 survey among marketers in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia, over half of respondents included Facebook among the social media platforms delivering the highest return on investment (ROI). Instagram and YouTube followed, mentioned by 43 and 33 percent of participants respectively.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/highlevel-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use HighLevel? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use HighLevel the most? The United States leads by a wide margin with 40,020 domains among the 64,439 companies we could enrich. The United Kingdom follows on 4,097, Canada on 3,616 and Australia on 3,504. After those four the numbers fall away sharply: Mexico 530, the Netherlands 505, Spain 492, India 487, Brazil 476, Germany 468, Italy 348, South Africa 344. HighLevel&apos;s reseller ecosystem grew out of North American agency communities and the geography still reflects that.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/highlevel-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use HighLevel the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Advertising Services leads at 6.86% (3,912 companies), with Marketing Services a fraction behind at 6.83% (3,897). Together those two are 13.69% of the enriched base, and they are largely the resellers themselves running HighLevel on their own sites. Business Consulting and Services (6.00%), Wellness and Fitness Services (5.71%) and Construction (5.39%) follow, and those are the client side: consultants, gyms and contractors whose lead capture an agency operates for them.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/highlevel-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>HighLevel Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is HighLevel only for small businesses? Very nearly. 76.22% of enriched companies have 1-10 employees and another 19.47% have 11-50, so 95.69% sit under fifty people. Only 30 companies in the set have more than 10,000. This is the agency model showing through in the firmographics rather than a separate finding: the sites we detect are the agencies&apos; clients, and an agency&apos;s book is mostly local service businesses. The large organisations that do appear, such as Crozer Health and Challenger Motor Freight, are typically detected on one campaign or recruiting subdomain rather than company-wide. These percentages describe the enriched subset, not all 109,442 domains.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/highlevel-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>HighLevel Market Share Among Marketing Automation</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is HighLevel&apos;s market share? HighLevel holds 8.91% of the Marketing Automation category and ranks #2 of 415 technologies we track in it, on 109,442 detected domains, based on our monthly crawl. HubSpot is far ahead at 583,796 domains and 47.55%, more than five times HighLevel&apos;s footprint. Below HighLevel the category fragments quickly: Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement (49,175 domains, 4.00%), WonderPush (34,319, 2.80%), RD Station (30,034, 2.45%) and Kliken (26,373, 2.15%). One caveat on the ranking: share here counts domains, and HighLevel&apos;s domain count runs high relative to its account count because agencies deploy it across client sites they do not own.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hostinger-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Hostinger? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries drive Hostinger&apos;s growth? India leads with 19.7% of all Hostinger customers, followed closely by Brazil at 18.9% and the United States at 12.9%, based on our analysis of 38,515 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. Emerging markets dominate: India, Brazil, and developing economies account for over 45% of the user base. English-speaking countries represent just 20.6% of customers. A sharp contrast to platforms like Squarespace or Shopify, reflecting Hostinger&apos;s strength in price-sensitive regions with growing digital economies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hostinger-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Hostinger the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries rely on Hostinger the most? IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 5.63%, followed by Advertising Services (4.68%) and Business Consulting (4.30%), based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io. The long tail matters: no single industry exceeds 6%, making Hostinger a genuinely horizontal platform. It serves freelancers, agencies, and small businesses across every vertical from retail to education to real estate. A reflection of budget hosting&apos;s universal appeal.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hostinger-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Hostinger Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies choose Hostinger? The data is unambiguous: Hostinger serves micro-businesses. 83.74% of customers have 1-10 employees, and another 10.53% fall in the 11-50 range, based on our analysis of 38,515 enriched companies at TechnologyChecker.io. Only 0.07% are enterprise-scale (10,001+ employees). Notable exceptions like Pfizer and McGill University use Hostinger for specific subdomain projects, staging environments, research sites, campaign microsites, rather than primary corporate hosting.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hostinger-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Hostinger Market Share Among Web Hosting</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Hostinger&apos;s market share? Hostinger holds 12.26% of the web hosting category on 1,192,207 domains, ranking #2 behind GoDaddy (45.04%). It is comfortably ahead of IONOS (6.56%) and OVH (4.39%), and the three of them together still do not reach GoDaddy.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hotjar-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Hotjar? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Hotjar the most? The United States leads with 64,268 domains, ahead of the United Kingdom at 22,321, Australia at 12,718, and the Netherlands at 12,400. The European weighting is the part worth noticing. Hotjar was founded and headquartered in Malta, and the United Kingdom, Netherlands, France, Spain, Italy, Germany, Poland, and Belgium together contribute 63,056 domains, which almost exactly matches the United States on its own. That is a wider European base than the US-headquartered tools in this category carry. The percentage beside each row is that country&apos;s share of all 223,684 companies we matched to a record, including the ones whose country we could not resolve, so the rows deliberately do not add up to 100%. Read the counts for magnitude.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hotjar-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Hotjar the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail is the largest single vertical at just 5.12%, with Software Development at 4.52% and Advertising Services at 4.19% behind it. That is a flat distribution. Nothing clears 5.2%, and the top ten industries together account for only 33.44% of enriched deployments, which makes Hotjar a horizontal purchase bought wherever somebody owns a conversion rate rather than a tool with a home vertical. The closest thing to a cluster is agency-side work: Advertising Services at 4.19%, IT Services and IT Consulting at 4.02%, and Business Consulting at 2.25% together reach 10.46%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hotjar-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Hotjar Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Hotjar only for small businesses? Mostly, and that is the pricing model working as designed. Companies with 1 to 10 staff account for 49.45% of the 213,958 deployments where we know headcount, another 29.14% sit at 11 to 50, and only 8.54% employ more than 200. A free entry tier and a self-serve checkout produce exactly this curve, and it is close to what we see for Microsoft Clarity, the other free-to-start tool in the category. The enterprise tail is real but thin: 758 deployments belong to organisations with more than 10,000 staff, among them Wipro, Ford, Lockheed Martin, and Veterans Affairs. Read the table as a domain count, where a global manufacturer and a two-person agency each contribute one row.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hotjar-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Hotjar Market Share Among Heatmaps &amp; Session Recording</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Hotjar&apos;s market share? Hotjar holds 26.93% of Heatmaps &amp; Session Recording and ranks 2nd of 34 tracked tools, behind Microsoft Clarity at 53.63%. The drop below it is steep too: Crazy Egg is 3rd at 7.42%, and Hotjar&apos;s 433,037 domains are more than three times its 119,369. The gap above is the one that is moving. Clarity is free with no session limit while Hotjar meters its free tier, and our migration data shows a net 3,013 domains moving from Hotjar to Clarity since March 2026. Read the Contentsquare row differently from the rest: at 1.94% it looks like a small rival, but it owns Hotjar, and the two brands together account for 464,163 detected domains.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hubspot-chat-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use HubSpot Chat? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use HubSpot Chat the most? The United States dominates with 19,476 companies (about 41% of enriched customers), followed by the United Kingdom (5,055) and Australia (2,430). Together the four core English-speaking markets account for roughly 61% of the user base, while France, Germany, and the Netherlands lead a long European tail, based on our analysis of 47,639 enriched companies.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hubspot-chat-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use HubSpot Chat the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 11.2%, and combined with IT Services (10.7%) and the broader Technology, Information and Internet category (4.1%), tech firms make up roughly a quarter of all HubSpot Chat users. Advertising and marketing agencies add another 6.4%. No single non-tech industry exceeds 4%, which marks HubSpot Chat as a horizontal tool weighted heavily toward B2B software and services, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hubspot-chat-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>HubSpot Chat Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is HubSpot Chat only for small businesses? Mostly. 37.5% of companies using HubSpot Chat have 1-10 employees and another 36.5% have 11-50, so about 74% sit under 50 staff, based on 46,566 size-classified companies at TechnologyChecker.io. That tracks with the product&apos;s free-with-CRM distribution. Larger deployments exist (Manpower, Otis, Arizona State University), but they usually run the widget on a marketing or help subdomain rather than across every property.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hubspot-chat-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>HubSpot Chat Market Share Among Live Chat &amp; Messaging</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is HubSpot Chat&apos;s market share? HubSpot Chat holds 2.81% of the live chat category on 82,739 domains, ranking #10. It is a bundled tool rather than a chosen one: the chat ships free inside HubSpot&apos;s CRM, so its footprint tracks CRM adoption rather than anyone evaluating chat widgets. That is also why its customers are larger than the category norm — only 37.16% have 1-10 employees.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hubspot-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use HubSpot? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use HubSpot the most? The United States leads with 135,708 domains, ahead of the United Kingdom (30,854) and Australia (15,442). Canada (13,810) and Germany (11,874) follow, and Europe is broad rather than narrow: France (10,281), the Netherlands (8,460), Spain (6,559), Italy (4,346), Switzerland (3,587), Sweden (3,433) and Belgium (3,269) all sit in the top 15. India (5,723), Brazil (5,274) and Mexico (3,849) lead outside Europe and North America. These counts cover the 319,898 domains we match to a company record, not the full 583,796 detected.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hubspot-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use HubSpot the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 8.71%, followed by IT Services and IT Consulting (7.06%) and Advertising Services (4.75%), across the 319,898 domains matched to a company record. HubSpot&apos;s B2B technology and professional-services skew is clear: Business Consulting and Services (4.30%), Financial Services (4.00%) and Technology, Information and Internet (3.82%) fill out the top six. No single vertical passes 9%, which is what a horizontal platform looks like. See how HubSpot compares by industry in our marketing automation industry breakdown.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hubspot-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>HubSpot Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is HubSpot only for small businesses? Small companies dominate it but do not define it. 43.01% of matched HubSpot domains belong to companies of 1-10 employees and 76.59% to companies of 50 or fewer, across the 319,898 domains we match to a company record. The band worth watching is 51-200 employees at 15.35%. Enterprise is present but thin: 782 domains (0.25%) belong to companies of 10,001+ employees, among them Ford, Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Cardinal Health. Remember these are domains rather than accounts, so a large company running HubSpot on several properties is counted several times.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hubspot-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>HubSpot Market Share Among Marketing Automation</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is HubSpot&apos;s market share? HubSpot holds 47.55% of the Marketing Automation category and ranks #1 of the 415 tools we track there, on 583,796 domains. Second place goes to HighLevel at 8.91% (109,442 domains), then Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement at 4.00% (49,175), WonderPush at 2.80% (34,319) and RD Station at 2.45% (30,034). The gap is the story: HubSpot runs on more than five times as many domains as the second-placed tool, and on more than twice the next four combined. Figures come from our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies here at TechnologyChecker.io. We analysed the wider competitive picture in our marketing automation market share report.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hubspot-platform-migration-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>HubSpot Migration by Platform 2026: Wins MailChimp, Loses Klaviyo</image:title>
      <image:caption>Across six marketing automation platforms, HubSpot gained 19,016 companies and lost 15,512, a net of +3,504 (1.23:1). The MailChimp corridor drives the entire net gain: 11,866 companies switched to HubSpot versus 4,714 leaving (a 2.5:1 win). Klaviyo is the largest drain, pulling 3,741 companies away versus only 671 arriving (5.6:1 against HubSpot) as e-commerce brands leave for commerce-native email. HighLevel is the fastest-rising threat, taking 1,522 companies with 96% of those moves in the last three years.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hubspot-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>HubSpot Usage Statistics 2005-2025: 121K Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Since its 2006 founding, HubSpot grew to over 119,741 active domains by January 2025, based on our detection data here at TechnologyChecker.io. Between 2019 and 2024, it more than quintupled its active user base as inbound marketing became the dominant B2B growth strategy. Recent data shows a dip to 102,644 active domains by mid-2025.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hugo-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Hugo? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Hugo the most? The United States leads with 2,771 detected companies, but the shape behind it is the interesting part. The United Kingdom (1,375) and Germany (1,357) are effectively level in second and third, and Germany on its own outweighs France (731) and the Netherlands (519) combined. Add Switzerland (271), Spain (213), Belgium (194), Italy (178), Poland (148), and Norway (145) and the European entries in our top fifteen come to 5,131 companies, close to double the United States figure. That makes Hugo the most European tool in this category by some margin. Outside Europe and North America the largest markets are India (386) and Australia (380), with Canada at 476 and Brazil at 243.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hugo-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Hugo the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 14.48% with IT Services and IT Consulting almost exactly level at 14.11%, and together those two verticals are 28.6% of every Hugo company we can classify. Add Technology, Information and Internet (6.59%) and Information Technology and Services (3.58%) and the developer-facing share passes 38%. Nothing else is close: Business Consulting and Services (2.75%), Computer and Network Security (2.4%), and Retail (2.23%) trail far behind. This is the sharpest buyer signal on any profile in the category. Hugo is not a horizontal website tool that developers happen to like, it is a developer tool, and the customer it implies is a different person from the one buying a hosted site builder.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hugo-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Hugo Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Hugo only for small teams? Mostly, yes. 77.39% of the Hugo companies we can size have 1-10 employees and another 15.5% sit in the 11-50 band, so more than nine in ten sit at fifty people or fewer. That is what a command-line tool with no hosted product and no sales motion looks like: adoption happens one developer at a time. The tail above it is thin but real, with 563 companies in the 51-200 band, 147 in 201-500, and 21 at 10,001 employees or more. At that end Hugo almost always sits on a documentation or developer subdomain rather than the primary site.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hugo-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Hugo Market Share Among Static Site Generators</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Hugo&apos;s market share? Hugo holds a 2.61% share of the Static Site Generators category and ranks fourth of 26 tracked generators, behind Next.js (731,970 domains), Astro (287,180), and Gatsby (29,767). The gap to Gatsby is roughly a thousand domains, close enough that the two can trade places on ordinary month-to-month movement. Two caveats belong with that ranking. Every count in this category is a floor, because these tools are only visible when the pages they build say so. And the counts are not measured on equal footing: a Hugo site announces itself in exactly one line of its page source, while a JavaScript framework leaves several separate fingerprints in a page, so part of the distance between 731,970 and 28,690 is how much each tool reveals about itself rather than how many sites run it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/human-only-mobile-share-by-country-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Mobile&apos;s Real Share: Human-Only Device Split by Country, May 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Filtering out automated traffic changes the picture sharply. Among human visitors, mobile is the majority almost everywhere: Bangladesh 77.9%, Nigeria 70.0%, the Philippines 69.6%, Japan 67.8%, and India 66.8%. Even the markets this report calls &apos;desktop-heavy&apos; sit close to an even split once bots are removed — Germany 48.0%, the Netherlands 47.4%, the United States 47.0%, and Finland 41.7% — far above their blended request-weighted figures of 22–30%. Iran remains a desktop outlier even among humans at 18.0% mobile, consistent with VPN/proxy routing. Globally, human-only mobile share is 54.9% — a majority — versus 40.4% for all bot-inclusive traffic.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/hyperscale-data-centers-worldwide-2015-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Hyperscale Data Centers Worldwide 2015-2025: 259 to 1,297 (5x Growth)</image:title>
      <image:caption>The number of hyperscale data centers worldwide reached 1,297 by the end of Q3 2025, up from just 700 in 2021 and 259 in 2015. The count has roughly doubled every four years as cloud and AI providers race to add capacity. Hyperscale facilities are the largest single-operator sites, run mainly by Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Meta, and a handful of others.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ibm-cloud-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use IBM Cloud? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use IBM Cloud the most? The United States holds 465 of the 1,275 companies we could place, 36.47%, which leaves 810, 63.53%, outside it. The United Kingdom is second on 148 (11.61%) and Australia third on 93 (7.29%), then France 61 (4.78%), Sweden and Germany level on 59 each (4.63%), Canada 39 (3.06%), New Zealand 28 (2.2%), Spain 27 (2.12%) and Brazil 26 (2.04%). The fifteen countries listed cover 1,094 of the 1,275, 85.8%. Two clusters sit inside that: the nine European countries in the list carry 429 companies, 33.65%, and Australia with New Zealand carries 121, 9.49%. The named detections agree. Orange, Danone and GEODIS in France, ING Group and Rabobank in the Netherlands, AON, Diageo and Intertek in the United Kingdom, Intesa Sanpaolo in Italy, E.ON in Germany, DSV in Denmark, Primark in Ireland, Petrobras and Santander&apos;s Brazilian group in Brazil, Yes Bank in Mumbai, RBC and Bell Canada in Canada. Sixteen of the 34 companies named on this page, 47.06%, are American, and that list is ordered by LinkedIn following rather than by country.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ibm-cloud-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use IBM Cloud the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Advertising Services leads at 96 of the 1,251 companies with a recorded industry, 7.67%, ahead of Financial Services at 55 (4.4%) and Hospitality at 49 (3.92%). Read the single rows and you would call this an agency product, which it is not. Group the related labels and the real concentration appears: Financial Services, Banking and Insurance together are 139 companies, 11.11%, while IT Services and IT Consulting with Software Development is 79, 6.31%. The twelve labels shown cover 521 companies, 41.65%, so 730 of the 1,251, 58.35%, sit outside them and are spread thinly. Advertising Services is also the row to treat with the most caution. Two things can put a label that high and this page cannot separate them. One is straightforward account setup. The other is a counting effect: we count domains, and an organisation that verifies several domains contributes several rows behind a single account. That label is broad on LinkedIn as well, covering agencies, media firms and marketing services businesses of very different kinds.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ibm-cloud-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>IBM Cloud Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use IBM Cloud? The distribution is close to flat, and that is the finding. 51-200 employees is the largest band at 259 of the 1,281 companies with a headcount on file, 20.22%, and 1001-5000 is level with it at 258, 20.14%. Nothing else reaches 15%: 201-500 is 188 (14.68%), 10001+ is 170 (13.27%), 501-1000 is 132 (10.3%), 11-50 is 106 (8.27%), 5001-10000 is 88 (6.87%) and 1-10 is 80 (6.25%). Grouped, 445 companies, 34.74%, employ 200 or fewer, and 516, 40.28%, employ more than 1,000. On the domain basis, 124 of the 1,405 domains, 8.83%, belong to organisations with 8,000 or more employees. This is not the shape an enterprise-only product produces, and the mechanism is why: publishing a TXT record to verify a domain is free and takes one DNS edit, so it records that an account exists at any tier, from a trial upward. The 34 companies named further down all sit in the 10001+ band because that table is ordered by LinkedIn following, not because the base is.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ibm-cloud-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>IBM Cloud Market Share Among Cloud Infrastructure</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is IBM Cloud&apos;s market share? IBM Cloud holds 0.18% of our Cloud Infrastructure category and ranks 8th of the 19 technologies in it, on 1,405 domains. Read that as a count of domains carrying a marker and nothing else. The category is dominated by Amazon S3 on 659,040 domains and 86.13%, then DigitalOcean Spaces (41,623, 5.44%), Google Cloud Storage (26,268, 3.43%) and Alibaba Cloud (18,768, 2.45%). Those rows are found in asset URLs on the pages we crawl, so a domain joins them the moment one image or script is served from a bucket. IBM Cloud joins on a DNS record a company publishes once per domain, and only when it sets up an account. Two surfaces, one shared denominator. The gap to 7th is 0.01 of a percentage point, HPE GreenLake at 0.19%, which is a second reason not to read the ordering as a market position. Docker, 6th on 0.5%, is the one row above IBM Cloud that we match the same way, on its own domain verification record.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ideasoft-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Ideasoft? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Ideasoft the most? Turkey accounts for 97.9% of companies whose country we know, the highest single-country concentration of any platform in this category. Nothing else reaches half a percent. Istanbul and Ankara dominate the city distribution. Ideasoft is a domestic Turkish platform in the fullest sense, and its global ranking should be read as a statement about the size of its home market rather than about the product.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ideasoft-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Ideasoft the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 22.74%, one of the highest retail concentrations in this category, followed by Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing (4.1%), Food and Beverage Manufacturing (3.81%) and Manufacturing (3.11%). The manufacturing cluster is the signature: furniture, food and general manufacturers account for over 11% of the base between them, which maps directly onto Turkey&apos;s domestic industrial sectors and onto the named customers below.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ideasoft-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ideasoft Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Ideasoft? 53.76% have 1-10 employees and another 30.26% have 11-50, putting 84.02% under fifty people. That 1-10 share is the second-lowest in this category after Magento, which means Ideasoft&apos;s base skews meaningfully larger than the typical hosted platform&apos;s, with 9.68% in the 51-200 band. Combined with an older age profile, 18.05% founded in the 2000s, this is a platform serving established Turkish businesses rather than new entrants.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ideasoft-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ideasoft Market Share Among Ecommerce Platforms</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Ideasoft&apos;s market share? Globally it holds 0.03% of the ecommerce platform category at #70. That ranking is an artefact of measuring a national platform on a global scale. In Turkey, where 97.9% of its merchants are, Ideasoft is an established commerce provider with a base of recognisable domestic brands. The comparison that matters is with ikas, the newer Turkish platform, which is roughly twice its size in our data and has a markedly younger customer base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ikas-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Ikas? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use ikas the most? Turkey accounts for 94.0% of companies whose country we know, with the United States at 1.4%, Germany at 1.2% and everything else below half a percent. English-speaking markets total 1.9%. Istanbul and Ankara are the leading cities by a wide margin. This is, in our data, a Turkish platform with a small diaspora presence, and any analysis that treats its global share as its market position will be wrong.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ikas-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Ikas the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 15.22% with Retail Apparel and Fashion a strong second at 9.45%, together 24.67%, a commerce concentration second only to PrestaShop and Shopify in this category. Food and Beverage Services (5.84%), Personal Care Product Manufacturing (5.3%) and Textile Manufacturing (5.1%) follow. That last pair is distinctive and distinctly Turkish: cosmetics and textiles are major domestic manufacturing sectors, and their producers are selling direct through ikas.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ikas-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ikas Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use ikas? 62.0% have 1-10 employees and another 23.53% have 11-50, putting 85.53% under fifty people. A notable 10.24% sit in the 51-200 band, higher than most hosted platforms in this category. The age profile is the standout: 45.23% were founded in the 2020s and 33.12% in the 2010s, making this the youngest merchant base we measure. ikas is growing with a cohort of new Turkish businesses rather than converting established ones.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ikas-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ikas Market Share Among Ecommerce Platforms</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is ikas&apos;s market share? Globally ikas holds 0.05% of the ecommerce platform category, ranking #36. That number is close to meaningless on its own, because ikas does not compete globally: 94.0% of its merchants are Turkish. The right way to read it is that ikas has built a base of 3,540 stores almost entirely within one national market, competing there against Shopify, WooCommerce and the local incumbent Ideasoft rather than against the category as a whole.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/imperva-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Imperva? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Imperva the most? The United States leads with 42.87% of enriched customers, a much lower concentration than most enterprise software we track. The United Kingdom (10.22%) and Australia (5.37%) follow, and Spain (3.73%) ranks ahead of both France and Germany. English-speaking countries account for 64.3% of the base, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/imperva-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Imperva the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Insurance is the dominant industry at 6.92%, followed by Financial Services (5.54%) and Retail (3.14%). The long tail matters here, because no single industry exceeds 7%, which makes Imperva horizontal infrastructure rather than a vertical product. Group the regulated finance verticals together, though, and insurance, financial services and banking reach 15.13% combined, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/imperva-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Imperva Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Imperva only for large enterprises? No, and the spread is wider than the category would suggest. 58.11% of Imperva customers have fewer than 50 employees, across our analysis of 15,860 enriched companies with a size on record, which reflects the self-serve cloud tier it has sold since the Incapsula years. At the other end, 12.17% employ more than 1,000 people, and that is where the banks, insurers and airlines in the company list sit.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/imperva-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Imperva Market Share Among WAF &amp; DDoS Protection</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Imperva&apos;s market share? Imperva holds a 12.01% share of the WAF &amp; DDoS Protection market, ranking #3 behind Sucuri (38.49%) and DDoS-Guard (37.79%), based on our monthly crawl of 50M+ domains and 40K+ tracked technologies at TechnologyChecker.io. Both leaders concentrate on small-site protection, so a rank built on domain count understates where Imperva actually competes.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/influencer-campaign-success-metrics-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>How Marketers Measure Influencer Campaign Success in 2025</image:title>
      <image:caption>Among marketers worldwide in 2025, 25.8 percent said engagement or clicks were the main way they measured influencer campaign success, narrowly ahead of content type or category (25.1 percent). Views or reach (21.8 percent) and sales (20.7 percent) trailed, showing that hard revenue metrics still rank below engagement proxies for most teams.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/influencer-marketing-agencies-2015-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Influencer Marketing Companies Worldwide: 190 to 6,939 (2015-2025)</image:title>
      <image:caption>The number of influencer marketing companies worldwide rose from roughly 190 in 2015 to a forecast 6,939 in 2025, a 19 percent increase over 2024 alone. The count of specialist agencies and platforms has grown more than 36-fold in a decade, reflecting how the discipline matured into its own industry.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/influencer-marketing-focus-areas-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Influencer Marketing Focus Areas 2026: AI Creator Matching Tops at 27%</image:title>
      <image:caption>Asked which area would be their main influencer marketing focus in 2026, 26.89 percent of marketers worldwide chose AI creator matching, ahead of social commerce (19.33 percent) and AI content generation (12.04 percent). Two of the three leading priorities are AI-driven, signaling where budgets and tooling are heading.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/influencer-marketing-market-size-2015-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Influencer Marketing Market Size 2015-2025: $1.7B to $32.55B</image:title>
      <image:caption>The global influencer marketing market grew from $1.7 billion in 2015 to an estimated $32.55 billion in 2025, more than tripling since 2020. The market has expanded almost 20-fold over the decade, with the steepest acceleration coming after 2020.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/infor-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Infor? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Infor the most? The United States holds 820 of the 1,553 companies we could place, 52.80%, ahead of Canada on 106 (6.83%), the United Kingdom on 76 (4.89%), Germany on 73 (4.70%) and Sweden on 58 (3.73%). Then Australia 54 (3.48%), the Netherlands 50 (3.22%), France 47 (3.03%), Norway 39 (2.51%), New Zealand 23 (1.48%), Italy 21 (1.35%), Switzerland 16 (1.03%), Belgium 13 (0.84%), Austria 13 (0.84%) and India 11 (0.71%). The shape worth naming is Nordic. Sweden and Norway together are 97 companies, 6.25% of the 1,553, which puts them ahead of Germany, and that is an unusual weighting for a US-headquartered ERP vendor. Two caveats before reading the table. Country here is the headquarters on the company record, not where the software runs. And because a verification record is published once at a group apex, a manufacturer that buys centrally appears once, under its head office, rather than once per plant or subsidiary, which pushes weight toward the countries where head offices sit rather than toward the countries where the plants are.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/infor-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Infor the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Wholesale leads at 9.46% of the 1,511 companies with a recorded industry, 143 companies, ahead of Food and Beverage Manufacturing on 80 (5.29%), Manufacturing on 78 (5.16%), Machinery Manufacturing on 76 (5.03%) and Construction on 72 (4.77%). Then Industrial Machinery Manufacturing 64 (4.24%), Wholesale Building Materials 58 (3.84%), Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing 52 (3.44%), Hospitals and Health Care 36 (2.38%) and Retail 34 (2.25%). Motor Vehicle Manufacturing (33, 2.18%) and Oil and Gas (32, 2.12%) sit just under the ten shown. Group the labels that describe the same kind of business and the table gets much sharper than any single row makes it look. Wholesale, Food and Beverage Manufacturing, Manufacturing, Machinery Manufacturing, Industrial Machinery Manufacturing, Wholesale Building Materials, Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing and Motor Vehicle Manufacturing come to 584 companies, 38.65% of the 1,511. Close to four in ten of the organisations we can classify either make something or move it. Construction at 72 (4.77%) sits next to that block for a related reason, since it buys the same project, materials and equipment problem from the other side.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/infor-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Infor Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Infor? A mid-market centre with a genuine enterprise tail, and the distribution shows both. 410 of the 1,551 companies with a size band, 26.43%, employ 51 to 200 people, the largest band in the table, with 11-50 second on 283 (18.25%) and 201-500 third on 257 (16.57%). Widen it one step and 51 to 500 employees is 667 companies, 43.00% of the 1,551, against 430 companies, 27.72%, at fifty or fewer. The top of the table is heavier than it is on most profiles: 294 companies, 18.96% of the 1,551, employ more than a thousand people, split across 194 at 1,001-5,000 (12.51%), 47 at 5,001-10,000 (3.03%) and 53 at 10,001+ (3.42%). Now set that against the named table, where 38 of the 50 organisations shown sit in the 10,001+ band, because that list is ordered by LinkedIn following and shows the top of the base rather than its centre. The centre is a distributor, food producer or machine builder of one to five hundred people running its orders, inventory and production scheduling on a CloudSuite edition, and that is a different buyer, on a different budget, from the ones in the logo table.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/infor-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Infor Market Share Among ERP</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Infor&apos;s market share? Infor holds 1.39% of ERP and ranks 3rd of 17 in that category, on 1,646 domains. Both figures rest on a row we already know is wrong, so read the rest of this paragraph before quoting either. ServiceNow leads the category on 89,589 domains and 75.42%. Its detection rule matched s_giq, a variable that belongs to Adobe AppMeasurement rather than to ServiceNow, which produced 92,335 stored detections against roughly 2,024 real ones. We corrected the rule on 2026-09-06, the re-crawl behind it has not landed yet, and the ERP category page is held out of our index until it does. Two things follow and both change how this rank reads. First, Infor&apos;s 1.39% is divided by a category total inflated by roughly 87,500 phantom domains, so the share understates Infor&apos;s real position by a wide margin. Second, the ordering changes shape. Once ServiceNow drops to roughly 2,024, Odoo on 25,473 domains (21.44%) stands alone at the top, and ServiceNow and Infor sit about 378 domains apart instead of 87,943 apart. Third place in that corrected table is a near-tie for second, not a distant third. Below Infor the category thins out fast: NetSuite on 678 domains (0.57%), ERPNext on 463 (0.39%) and Track Hospitality Software on 229 (0.19%). Do not quote 1.39% or 3rd of 17 as a clean reading until the re-crawl lands.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/insider-one-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Insider One? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Insider One the most? Among the 7,182 domains we can match to a company, the United States leads with 2,806 (39.1%), followed by the United Kingdom (566), Brazil (359), India (355) and Turkiye (242). The tail is where this product differs from its peers: Spain (211), Canada (208), Australia (207), France (181), Netherlands (168), Mexico (99), Indonesia (95) and Colombia (58) all register. Insider One was founded in Turkey and built its base across emerging markets before expanding, and the detected footprint still reflects a genuinely multi-regional customer list rather than a US-plus-Europe one.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/insider-one-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Insider One the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 8.77%, followed by Restaurants (6.67%) and Hospitality (3.18%). Adding Retail Apparel and Fashion (2.24%) and Food and Beverage Services (2.07%), the consumer-facing cluster reaches roughly 23% of matched companies. Restaurants at second place is unusual for a customer data platform and reflects Insider One&apos;s strength in app-and-web engagement for quick-service and delivery brands, where push, SMS and on-site personalisation drive repeat orders. The remainder is a thin tail, with Individual and Family Services (2.69%), Technology and Internet (2.52%) and IT Services (2.36%) all clustered closely below.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/insider-one-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Insider One Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Insider One? The distribution has a long small-business tail — 61.02% have 1-10 employees and 20.87% have 11-50 — but the enterprise end is what distinguishes it. 1.01% have 10,001+ employees, three to ten times the rate we see on comparable tools in this refresh batch, and a further 2.67% sit in the 1,001-5,000 band. Based on 7,182 enriched companies. That enterprise weighting matches the named customer list — Samsung, IKEA, Toyota, Adidas, Vodafone, Singapore Airlines — and the multi-market deployment pattern that produces more domains than customers.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/insider-one-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Insider One Market Share Among Customer Data Platform</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Insider One&apos;s market share? Insider One holds 4.69% of the Customer Data Platform category on 12,495 detected domains, ranking #6 of 68. Ahead of it sit Segment (69,596) and Adobe Experience Platform Identity Service (69,593), separated by three domains, then mParticle (21,362), Rudderstack (19,331) and Lotame (16,620). Note that these are not all the same kind of product: Segment and Rudderstack are event-routing pipelines, while Insider One is a customer engagement and personalisation platform that happens to hold customer data to do its job. It competes more directly with Braze and Bloomreach than with anything in the top three.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/instagram-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Instagram? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries embed Instagram the most? The United States leads with 6,612 enriched companies, and Brazil is a clear second on 2,190, ahead of India (1,166), the United Kingdom (825) and Germany (714). Brazil&apos;s placing is the notable one, since it outranks every European market on this list. Thailand (354), Indonesia (310) and Argentina (195) also appear, giving the embed a broader non-Anglophone spread than the named company list on its own suggests.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/instagram-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Instagram the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Retail leads at 5.74%, ahead of Spectator Sports (3.33%), Advertising Services (2.90%) and Non-profit Organizations (2.73%). Nothing passes 5.8%, which makes this a very flat spread: Wellness and Fitness (2.57%), Real Estate (2.47%), Restaurants (2.47%) and Construction (2.17%) all sit within a point of each other, and education appears twice, as Primary and Secondary (2.08%) and Higher Education (1.94%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/instagram-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Instagram Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is the Instagram embed a small-business thing? Largely. 63.25% of the 19,145 enriched companies have 1-10 employees, and adding the 11-50 band covers 84.75% of them. The large organisations that do appear are mostly institutional rather than corporate: universities, school districts and state agencies make up most of the recognisable names in the list below, with consumer brands such as Wegmans, Asus and Keurig Dr Pepper beside them.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/instagram-embed-companies-by-country-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Companies Using Instagram by Country 2026: US Leads</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States leads business adoption of Instagram by a wide margin, with 4,624 detected company websites — far ahead of Brazil (945) and the United Kingdom (627). This is the reverse of consumer usage, where India leads the world with 480 million Instagram users but ranks only fourth for business adoption (583 sites). Where people use Instagram and where businesses put it on their websites are two different maps.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/instagram-embed-companies-by-size-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Companies Using Instagram by Size 2026: 69% Are Tiny</image:title>
      <image:caption>Of the 13,383 companies TechnologyChecker matched to firmographic data, 68.76 percent of those using Instagram on their websites have just 1-10 employees, and nearly 85 percent have fewer than 50. Fewer than 4 percent have more than 1,000 employees — confirming that using Instagram on a company site is overwhelmingly a small-business signal, even though recognizable enterprises also do it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/instagram-users-by-age-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Instagram Age Demographics 2025: 63% of Users Are Under 35</image:title>
      <image:caption>As of July 2025, the largest Instagram age group worldwide is 25-34 year-olds at 33.3 percent, followed by 18-24 year-olds at 29.7 percent. Together, under-35s make up roughly 63 percent of the global Instagram audience, confirming the platform&apos;s continued skew toward younger users. Only 8.8 percent of users are aged 55 or older.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/instagram-users-by-country-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Instagram Users by Country 2025: India Leads With 480 Million</image:title>
      <image:caption>India has the largest Instagram audience in the world with 480.55 million users as of October 2025 — more than double the United States in second place at 181.75 million. Brazil ranks third with 147 million, followed by Indonesia at 107.6 million and Japan at 63.2 million.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/instagram-users-worldwide-2019-2028.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Instagram Users Worldwide 2019-2028: Climbing Toward 1.8 Billion</image:title>
      <image:caption>Statista&apos;s user model estimates the global Instagram user base grew from roughly 870 million in 2019 to about 1.47 billion in 2025, and projects continued growth to a peak of around 1.8 billion users by 2028 after nine consecutive years of annual increases. This user-model figure is deliberately more conservative than the 3 billion monthly-active-user milestone Meta reported in 2025 — the two metrics count different things.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/intercom-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Intercom? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Intercom the most? The United States dominates at 45.8% of all customers, with Intercom present in 120+ countries. The UK (8.5%) and Canada (3.9%) round out the top three. English-speaking countries account for over 58% of the user base, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/intercom-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Intercom the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development is the top industry at 17.79%, followed by Technology, Information and Internet (8.64%). Combine the tech-adjacent verticals and over 32% of Intercom&apos;s customer base is in software and technology. But no single vertical exceeds 18%. Intercom is a horizontal platform with a clear tech lean.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/intercom-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Intercom Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Intercom only for startups? Not quite, but small teams are its core. 57.7% of Intercom customers have 1-10 employees, based on our analysis of 48,404 enriched companies. Micro-businesses make up most of the install base. That said, PwC, Adobe, and American Express all use it too, so it clearly works at enterprise size.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/intercom-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Intercom Market Share Among Live Chat &amp; Messaging</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Intercom&apos;s market share? Intercom holds 4.15% of the live chat category on 122,348 domains, ranking #6. Share by domain count undersells a paid product in a category led by free and bundled tools: WhatsApp, Re:amaze, Tawk.to and joinchat sit above it and none of them is a comparable purchase. Among paid customer-messaging platforms Intercom is the largest here.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/internet-shutdown-duration-ranking-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Iran&apos;s 87-Day Blackout in Context: Long, But Not the Longest on Record</image:title>
      <image:caption>Iran&apos;s nationwide internet shutdown ran 87 consecutive days, from February 28 to May 26, 2026, by Cloudflare Radar&apos;s traffic record — the longest single event in our quarterly outage tracker. It is not, however, the longest national-scale blackout on record. Jammu &amp; Kashmir endured 213 days of absolutely no internet from August 2019 before 2G was partially restored in January 2020 (and 552 days before full 4G returned). Set against Sudan&apos;s 36-day 2019 blackout and Iran&apos;s own 24-day January 2026 shutdown, the 2026 event is exceptional but part of a worsening pattern, not an outlier without precedent.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/invision-power-board-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Invision Power Board? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Invision Power Board the most? Among the minority we can identify, the United States leads with 195 companies, 37.5% of the enriched base, followed by the United Kingdom (44), France (28), Brazil (25), Germany (22) and Poland (21). Absolute numbers are small because enrichment is only 17.3% — most Invision boards are enthusiast communities with no company behind them. Norway (13), Sweden (9) and Russia (9) in the top ten point to the same European hobbyist base that legacy forum software has retained.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/invision-power-board-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Invision Power Board the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 10.25%, but the more characteristic entry is second: Computer Games at 7.74%, the highest gaming concentration in this refresh. Adding Technology and Internet (7.29%), IT Services (3.87%), Spectator Sports (3.64%) and Entertainment Providers (2.73%), the picture is of gaming clans, hobby communities and fan forums. Invision&apos;s paid licence and app ecosystem made it the choice for communities that wanted more polish than phpBB offered without vBulletin&apos;s enterprise pricing, and gaming communities were its natural constituency.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/invision-power-board-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Invision Power Board Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size companies use Invision Power Board? Among identifiable owners, 59.53% have 1-10 employees and 23.34% have 11-50, so 82.9% sit under 50 people. Only 0.43% exceed 10,000. Read that against the 17.3% enrichment rate: more than four in five Invision installations have no company record at all, because they are hobbyist boards rather than businesses. The named corporate users the vendor cites — Zeiss, Kaspersky Lab, Gibson Brands, HTC — are real but atypical of the installed base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/invision-power-board-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Invision Power Board Market Share Among Community &amp; Comments</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Invision Power Board&apos;s market share? Invision holds 1.06% of the Community &amp; Comments category on 3,001 domains, ranking #6 of 63. Livefyre (227,094 domains, 80.11%) nominally leads the category, but Adobe discontinued the service in 2017 — those detections are abandoned script tags rather than a competing product. Among live products, Disqus (13,033), XenForo (7,881), phpBB (6,550) and Discourse (3,760) sit above it, and vBulletin (2,154) below. Invision and vBulletin are the two commercial PHP forums of the same generation, and Invision has fared better: it is 39% larger by footprint, carries 4% churn against vBulletin&apos;s 9.9%, and has a slightly less historic customer base.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/invoca-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Invoca? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Invoca the most? The United States accounts for 15,370 of the 15,587 enriched companies with a country on file, which is 98.6% and makes Invoca the most geographically concentrated platform in our Call Tracking category. Canada is a distant second at 137 companies. For comparison, CallRail&apos;s US share is 88.6%. Invoca has effectively no footprint outside its home market, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/invoca-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Invoca the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Insurance dominates at 44.82%, more than three times the next entry, Law Practice (13.88%). Add Legal Services (6.33%) and insurance plus legal reach 65% of the base. Nothing else in our Call Tracking category comes close to that concentration; CallRail&apos;s largest vertical is 12.31%. Invoca isn&apos;t a horizontal call tracking product, it&apos;s an insurance and legal lead-routing tool that happens to sit in this category, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/invoca-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Invoca Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Isn&apos;t Invoca an enterprise platform? The contract is, the detection isn&apos;t. 65.53% of domains running Invoca have ten or fewer employees and 92.2% have 50 or fewer, based on our analysis of 15,323 companies with employee data on file. Only 1.93% exceed 1,000 staff. The most likely reading is that Invoca lands as a national contract and then deploys across an agent or franchise network, so one enterprise buyer produces hundreds of small-business detections.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/invoca-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Invoca Market Share Among Call Tracking</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Invoca&apos;s market share? Invoca holds a 14.12% share of the Call Tracking market and ranks #2 of the 43 platforms we track, behind CallRail (39.85%) and ahead of CallTrackingMetrics (12.81%). Second place understates how different the position is. Invoca sells conversation intelligence to enterprise marketing teams, so it competes on a smaller number of much larger contracts, based on our monthly crawl of 29.9M active domains at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/invoca-usage-statistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Invoca Usage Statistics 2012-2026: 23,770 Active Websites</image:title>
      <image:caption>Invoca entered our detection history in October 2012 and stayed small for a decade: 13 domains in January 2016, 120 by 2018, 529 by 2022. The real move came later. Between January 2024 and April 2025 our history shows it going from 1,890 to 8,735 active domains, a 4.6x expansion inside fifteen months and the steepest run in this category. Note the gap in the chart. The series joins our long-run history through July 2025 to our current crawl from June 2026, so the step across that break is coverage, not adoption.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ionos-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use IONOS? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use IONOS the most? Germany dominates with 35.2% of all customers, reflecting IONOS&apos;s European heritage (formerly 1&amp;1, founded in Germany). The United Kingdom (17.9%) and Spain (15.1%) round out the top three. Together, European markets account for over 78% of the user base, while the US represents just 12.6%, based on our enriched company data, based on our data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ionos-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use IONOS the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries rely on IONOS most? Business Consulting and Services is the dominant industry at 6.23%, followed by Construction (4.9%) and Retail (3.5%). The long tail is significant, no single industry exceeds 6.3%, which makes IONOS a genuinely horizontal platform serving diverse sectors rather than concentrating in specific verticals, based on our enriched company data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ionos-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>IONOS Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is IONOS only for small businesses? Yes, overwhelmingly so. With 90.5% of IONOS customers having 1-10 employees based on our analysis of 100,000 enriched companies, the platform is the go-to choice for micro-businesses and solopreneurs. Only 0.16% are enterprise organizations (1,000+ employees), making IONOS distinctly SMB-focused, based on our data at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ionos-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>IONOS Market Share Among Web Hosting</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is IONOS&apos;s market share? IONOS holds 6.56% of the web hosting category on 637,254 domains, ranking #3 behind GoDaddy (45.04%) and Hostinger (12.26%). Read the ranking regionally rather than globally: within Germany, IONOS is the incumbent, and its 219,630 German domains are the largest single-country concentration of any host in this table.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ip-api-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use ip-api? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States dominates with 9,746 of the companies we can place, more than nine times India in second (1,038), then the United Kingdom (785) and Canada (639). That is a far more US-concentrated profile than ipapi.co&apos;s, which has India close behind the US, and it is the clearest difference between two products that otherwise look identical.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ip-api-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use ip-api the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 12.52%, then Technology and Internet at 6.71%, Advertising Services at 5.77% and Retail at 5.66%. That is a more developer-weighted profile than ipapi.co&apos;s, where no industry clears 7%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ip-api-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ip-api Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>49.25% of the companies we can size have 10 employees or fewer and 32.2% have 11 to 50. The free endpoint needs no account at all and is capped at 45 requests a minute per IP, which is generous for a small site and unusable for a large one, and the distribution follows that cap.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ip-api-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ip-api Market Share Among Visitor Identification</image:title>
      <image:caption>ip-api is fourth in Visitor Identification at 10.27%. The category name oversells it: this is an IP geolocation lookup, and it sits alongside device fingerprinting and B2B company resolution products that do entirely different jobs. Its actual competitor is ipapi.co (41,649 domains), with MaxMind (4,744) as the paid alternative. Our category listing pages at 50 rows, so we state the rank without a total.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ipapi-co-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use ipapi.co? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States leads with 5,312 of the companies we can place, then India at 1,968, the United Kingdom (1,430), Brazil (907), Germany (757) and Australia (729). India in second place is unusually high and fits a free developer API with no signup: the barrier to trying it is zero everywhere, so distribution tracks where developers are rather than where budgets are.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ipapi-co-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use ipapi.co the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>There is no dominant vertical. IT Services and IT Consulting leads at 6.06%, then Software Development 5.65%, Technology and Internet 4.19% and Retail 3.81%. Nothing reaches 7%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ipapi-co-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ipapi.co Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>53.86% of the companies we can size have 10 employees or fewer and 27.9% have 11 to 50. The free tier allows roughly a thousand lookups a day with no account, which is enough for a small site permanently and not enough for a large one, so the size distribution is close to a direct read of that limit.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ipapi-co-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ipapi.co Market Share Among Visitor Identification</image:title>
      <image:caption>ipapi.co is second in Visitor Identification at 14.42%, behind FingerprintJS. That ranking is worth reading carefully, because the category mixes three unrelated businesses: device fingerprinting (FingerprintJS, ClientJS), IP geolocation lookups (ipapi.co, ip-api, MaxMind) and B2B company resolution (Leadfeeder, Zoominfo, Leadinfo). ipapi.co competes with the second group only. Note also that our category listing pages at 50 rows, so we state the rank without a total.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/ireland-data-center-electricity-share-2015-2023.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Ireland Data Center Electricity Share 2015-2023: 5% to 21% (4.2x Growth)</image:title>
      <image:caption>Ireland is the world&apos;s most data-center-dependent national grid. Data centers consumed 21 percent of Ireland&apos;s national electricity in 2023, up from 5 percent in 2015 — a 4.2x increase in eight years. The growth came from an attractive tax environment and strong digital infrastructure, and it has triggered national debates about whether data center siting moratoriums are necessary.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/it-budget-allocation-na-europe-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>IT Budget Allocation in North America &amp; Europe 2025 by Segment</image:title>
      <image:caption>Hardware and software projects tie at 19 percent each of 2025 IT budgets in North America and Europe. Hosted/cloud projects take 15 percent, IT labor 13 percent, and managed services 10 percent. Facilities and power sits at 9 percent, a line that will expand as AI workloads reshape data center energy demand.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/it-services-market-total-revenue-2016-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Global IT Services Market Revenue 2016-2030: $863B to Forecast $1.82 Trillion</image:title>
      <image:caption>The worldwide IT services market is forecast to reach $1.82 trillion by 2030, up from roughly $863 billion in 2016 — a 2.1x expansion. In 2024, IT outsourcing alone generated $542.4 billion, other IT services $406.2 billion, and business process outsourcing $394.5 billion. Growth is consistent across every sub-segment.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jamf-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Jamf? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Jamf the most? The United States accounts for 4,770 of the 8,135 organisations we could locate, 58.64%, ahead of the United Kingdom on 621 (7.63%) and Australia on 389 (4.78%). Australia in third is the row worth pausing on: it sits above Germany&apos;s 370 and carries 1.64 times Canada&apos;s 237, which inverts the ordering we see on most profiles. English-speaking countries hold 6,073 organisations between them, 74.65% of the located base, based on our enriched company data.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jamf-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Jamf the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development takes the largest single label at 11.38% of the 7,923 organisations with a recorded industry, followed by Higher Education (7.67%), Financial Services (7.17%) and IT Services and IT Consulting (6.88%). The real leader is education, and the chart hides it across three rows: Higher Education, Primary and Secondary Education (5.38%) and Education Administration Programs (3.81%) come to 1,336 organisations, 16.86%, well clear of Software Development&apos;s single-label lead.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jamf-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Jamf Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Jamf only for large enterprises? Close to it, and this chart runs the opposite way to almost everything else we publish. 30.42% of the 8,050 organisations that report a headcount employ more than 1,000 people, 7.49% employ more than 10,000, and only 8.02% employ ten or fewer. On most profiles that last figure runs between 50% and 65%: Debian is 65.25%. The mass here sits in the middle and above, 51-200 at 21.94%, 1001-5000 at 18.43% and 201-500 at 16.46%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jamf-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Jamf Market Share Among Productivity &amp; Collaboration</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Jamf&apos;s market share? Jamf holds 2.35% of Productivity &amp; Collaboration and ranks 10th of the 43 technologies in that category, on 8,866 domains. Atlassian leads on 133,558 domains and 35.46% share, with Zoom (11.76%), DocuSign (10.12%) and Kakao (9.29%) behind it. Read that ranking as filing rather than competition: the category holds video calls, e-signature, chat and device management side by side, and nothing ranked above Jamf in it manages a device. Atlassian is detected on 52.81% of these same domains, which is not what a competitor looks like. Based on our monthly crawl at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jekyll-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Jekyll? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>The United States accounts for 802 matched companies, 33.56% of the geographic base, with the United Kingdom at 11.34% and Germany at 7.99%. India (5.82%) and France (4.90%) follow. The distribution is flatter than most of this category, which fits a tool distributed through GitHub rather than through a hosting company&apos;s regional marketing.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jekyll-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Jekyll the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Software Development leads at 26.22%, followed by IT Services and IT Consulting (18.65%), Technology, Information and Internet (9.60%), Information Technology &amp; Services (4.06%) and Computer and Network Security (3.66%).</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jekyll-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Jekyll Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>76.52% of matched Jekyll companies employ 1 to 10 people and 16.07% employ 11 to 50. Only 88 organisations in the entire matched set have more than 200 employees. This is the size distribution of a tool with no licence, no dashboard and no sales motion: it spreads because one engineer chose it, and it stays because nothing forces a review.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jekyll-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Jekyll Market Share Among Static Site Generators</image:title>
      <image:caption>Jekyll holds 0.69% of Static Site Generators and ranks 5th, behind Next.js (731,970 domains), Astro (287,180), Gatsby (29,767) and Hugo (28,690). The gap to the leaders is real but the measurement is not symmetrical: Next.js and Astro ship runtime artefacts that a production build cannot remove, while Jekyll is identified almost entirely by a generator meta tag that themes routinely strip. Treat 7,537 as the number of Jekyll sites that did not turn the tag off.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jivochat-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use JivoChat? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Where is JivoChat actually used? Among the 11,775 domains we could match to a company record, Brazil leads by a distance with 3,859 — close to four times the United States (996) — ahead of Türkiye (889) and Russia (824). The United Kingdom (443), India (306) and Mexico (239) follow. On that table JivoChat reads as a Latin American product with a long international tail, and Russia, the country the vendor was founded in, is only fourth. The co-occurrence data disagrees, and it is measured on a wider base. Yandex.Metrika, the Russian analytics standard, runs on 50.31% of JivoChat domains (17,965) — and that share is taken across the full detected set of 35,744, not across the 11,775 matched companies. 1C-Bitrix, a Russian CMS, adds another 11.23% (4,010 domains). Half of JivoChat&apos;s detected base runs Russian analytics while only 824 matched companies sit in Russia. The two figures do not contradict each other; they count different populations. Matching a domain to a company needs a resolvable public company record, which Russian-language small sites are far less likely to have than a Brazilian retailer with a LinkedIn page, so the country table systematically under-counts exactly the cluster the stack data makes obvious. The vendor&apos;s own asset host, code.jivo.ru, points the same way. Two cautions on these counts. They are matched domains, not customers and not revenue. And the country is read from the company record rather than from the domain, so it carries enrichment error — polibatam.ac.id, an Indonesian polytechnic, is filed under the United Kingdom in our data. The Russian-language cluster beyond Russia itself is visible in the tail: Belarus (179), Ukraine (175) and Kazakhstan (114) add 468 matched companies between them.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jivochat-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use JivoChat the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which industries run JivoChat? No single one, particularly. Retail leads at 8.96% (931 matched companies), then IT Services and IT Consulting at 5.8% (602), Software Development at 3.26% (339), Real Estate at 2.88% (299) and Advertising Services at 2.8% (291). The entire top ten comes to 34.8% of matched companies, which is a flat distribution by the standards of this corpus. A flat industry curve is what a horizontal, self-serve tool looks like. Anyone with a website and customers to answer can install it, and nothing in the product pulls one vertical harder than another. It also means there is no vertical for a rival to attack: displacing JivoChat is a price-and-language argument rather than a workflow one. As with country, industry is read from the matched company record, so this describes 11,775 domains rather than all 35,744.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jivochat-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>JivoChat Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>What size of business runs JivoChat? Overwhelmingly the smallest. Among matched companies with an employee band on record, 51.43% have 1–10 employees and 28.45% have 11–50 — 79.9% under fifty people. Mid-market, meaning 51 to 500 employees, accounts for 17.11%. Everything from 1,001 employees upwards comes to 1.44%, with just 23 matched companies in the 10,001+ band. That distribution is what a generous free tier produces, and it is also part of why the churn ratio on this page is high. A one-person shop that installs a free chat widget and abandons it two quarters later is a common event, and a rule that matches the widget actually loading registers the abandonment within a crawl or two. The enterprise names elsewhere on this page are the exception this chart should be read against, not a correction to it.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jivochat-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>JivoChat Market Share Among Live Chat &amp; Messaging</image:title>
      <image:caption>JivoChat holds 1.16% of the Live Chat &amp; Messaging category, ranking #14. The largest technology in the same category is WhatsApp Business Chat.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/joomla-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Joomla? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Joomla the most? Germany leads at 24.8% of companies whose country we know (39,254 of them), an unusual #1 position in our dataset, where the US typically dominates. The United States ranks second at 13.4%, followed by Italy (6.5%), the United Kingdom (5.6%), the Netherlands (5.1%) and France (4.8%). Europe accounts for 68.4% of the entire Joomla base, the highest European concentration of any platform in this category, while English-speaking markets account for only 23.4%, the lowest. This reflects the strong German-language open-source community and European public-sector procurement rules favouring self-hosted software.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/joomla-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Joomla the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Construction is the top industry at 5.65%, followed by Business Consulting and Services (3.92%), Retail (3.73%), IT Services and IT Consulting (3.07%) and Medical Practices (3.01%). The long tail is significant: no single industry exceeds 6%, indicating Joomla serves as a general-purpose CMS rather than a vertical-specific solution.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/joomla-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Joomla Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Joomla only for small organizations? Mostly. 71.12% of Joomla sites we can size have 10 or fewer employees, with another 19.02% at 11–50, putting 90.14% under fifty people. But the remaining 9.86% is a meaningfully larger institutional tier than the hosted builders carry, Joomla has nearly three times Squarespace&apos;s proportion at 51+ employees, and the 212 organisations at 10,001+ include the World Health Organization, U. S. Bank, MediaTek, Malaysia&apos;s Ministry of Health and Kenya&apos;s Teachers Service Commission, all of which chose Joomla for open-source licensing and self-hosting.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/joomla-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Joomla Market Share Among CMS &amp; Website Builders</image:title>
      <image:caption>What is Joomla&apos;s market share? Joomla holds a 1.5% share of the CMS and website-builder market, ranking #6, behind hosted builders like Wix (8.72%) and Squarespace (6.84%) and just ahead of Duda (1.45%). Once the second-largest CMS after WordPress, Joomla now sits in a small open-source tier alongside Drupal (1.07%), it still leads Drupal by roughly 64,000 domains, as both lose ground to no-code alternatives. Based on our monthly crawl of 28M+ domains at TechnologyChecker.io.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jotform-customers-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Which Countries Use Jotform? Top 10 Markets in 2026</image:title>
      <image:caption>Which countries use Jotform the most? The United States dominates with 5,415 companies, 56.9% of the enriched base and the highest US concentration in this refresh batch. The United Kingdom (652), Canada (473) and Australia (389) follow, so English-speaking markets account for roughly 73%. India (272) and Germany (272) tie for fifth. That weighting is consistent with a product whose strongest verticals are US healthcare and US construction, both of which have regulatory and licensing structures that make forms a domestic concern.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jotform-customers-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>What Industries Use Jotform the Most?</image:title>
      <image:caption>Jotform has the most sharply defined vertical profile in this refresh batch. Medical Practices leads at 7.53% and Hospitals and Health Care adds 4.34%, so healthcare totals 11.87% — roughly double the next sector. Construction follows at 6.5%. Then a long tail: IT Services (3.1%), Real Estate (3.04%), Financial Services (2.89%) and Advertising Services (2.62%). The healthcare concentration is not incidental. Jotform offers HIPAA-compliant forms on its paid tiers, and intake, consent and referral forms are exactly the workflow a small practice needs and cannot build itself.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/jotform-customers-by-size.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Jotform Customers by Company Size</image:title>
      <image:caption>Is Jotform only for small businesses? Mostly, though the mid-market is well represented. 60.59% of matched companies have 1-10 employees and 26.18% have 11-50, so 86.8% sit under 50 people, based on 9,517 enriched companies. That enrichment rate — 76.8% of detected domains match a company record — is among the highest in our index, and it tells you these are real registered businesses rather than hobby sites. Organisations with 10,001+ employees account for 0.2%.</image:caption>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/dns-statistics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dns-statistics/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dns-statistics/02-nxdomain-returned-mail.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 nxdomain returned mail</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dns-statistics/03-encrypted-dns-envelopes.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 encrypted dns envelopes</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dns-statistics/04-dns-hosting-hubs.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 dns hosting hubs</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/operating-system-market-share</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/chart-01-four-headline-numbers.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 01 four headline numbers</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/chart-02-global-share-donut.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 02 global share donut</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/chart-05-linux-vs-chromeos-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 05 linux vs chromeos 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/01-two-rulers-disagree.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 two rulers disagree</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/chart-03-desktop-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 03 desktop share</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/chart-07-bot-vs-human-ratio.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 07 bot vs human ratio</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/02-reclassified-bucket.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 reclassified bucket</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/chart-06-linux-decomposition.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 06 linux decomposition</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/chart-04-mobile-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 04 mobile share</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/chart-08-android-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 08 android by country</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/03-world-os-divide.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 world os divide</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/chart-09-server-os-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 09 server os share</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/04-server-racks-regional.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 server racks regional</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/chart-10-debian-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 10 debian by country</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/chart-11-server-os-by-industry.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 11 server os by industry</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/operating-system-market-share/05-pick-the-right-cut.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 pick the right cut</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share/01-search-referral-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 search referral share</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share/02-browser-family-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 browser family share</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share/03-windows-vs-android-flip.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 windows vs android flip</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share/04-os-share-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 os share by country</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share/05-microsoft-365-vs-workspace.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 microsoft 365 vs workspace</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share/06-source-contradiction.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 source contradiction</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share/07-azure-vs-google-cloud.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 azure vs google cloud</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share/08-crawler-share-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 crawler share 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share/09-crawler-share-yoy.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>09 crawler share yoy</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share/12-crawl-exchange.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>12 crawl exchange</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share/10-crawl-to-refer-search.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>10 crawl to refer search</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share/11-crawl-to-refer-ai.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>11 crawl to refer ai</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-vs-microsoft-market-share/13-choosing-a-stack.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>13 choosing a stack</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/amazon-web-services-aws-logo-cover.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>amazon web services aws logo cover</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/aws-reinvent-signage.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>aws reinvent signage</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/statista/aws-quarterly-revenue-growth-2014-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>aws quarterly revenue growth 2014 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/aws-revenue-growth-reacceleration.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>aws revenue growth reacceleration</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/statista/aws-quarterly-net-sales-2014-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>aws quarterly net sales 2014 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/statista/amazon-net-sales-by-segment-2006-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>amazon net sales by segment 2006 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/aws-market-share-cloud-competition.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>aws market share cloud competition</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/statista/cloud-infrastructure-vendor-share-quarterly.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cloud infrastructure vendor share quarterly</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/statista/microsoft-azure-revenue-growth-quarterly.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>microsoft azure revenue growth quarterly</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/statista/enterprise-public-cloud-adoption-2017-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>enterprise public cloud adoption 2017 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/aws-azure-adoption-depth-vs-reach.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>aws azure adoption depth vs reach</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/aws-outposts-private-cloud-adoption-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>aws outposts private cloud adoption 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/statista/private-cloud-platform-usage-2017-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>private cloud platform usage 2017 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/aws-small-business-customer-base.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>aws small business customer base</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/aws-detected-domains-by-country-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>aws detected domains by country 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/statista/iaas-market-size-2015-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>iaas market size 2015 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/statista/saas-market-size-2015-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>saas market size 2015 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/aws-outage-concentration-risk.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>aws outage concentration risk</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/statista/technologies-shaping-cyber-threats-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>technologies shaping cyber threats 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/amazon-web-services-aws-statistics/statista/cybersecurity-skill-gaps-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cybersecurity skill gaps 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/google-cloud-statistics-report</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-cloud-statistics-report/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-cloud-statistics-report/05-google-cloud-brand-banner.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 google cloud brand banner</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-cloud-statistics-report/statista/google-revenue-distribution-by-segment.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>google revenue distribution by segment</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-cloud-statistics-report/statista/cloud-infrastructure-vendor-share-quarterly.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cloud infrastructure vendor share quarterly</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-cloud-statistics-report/01-commitment-jars.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 commitment jars</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-cloud-statistics-report/statista/enterprise-public-cloud-adoption-2017-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>enterprise public cloud adoption 2017 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-cloud-statistics-report/02-multi-cloud-islands.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 multi cloud islands</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-cloud-statistics-report/statista/private-cloud-platform-usage-2017-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>private cloud platform usage 2017 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-cloud-statistics-report/statista/public-cloud-services-used-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>public cloud services used 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-cloud-statistics-report/03-marketplace-grid.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 marketplace grid</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-cloud-statistics-report/statista/google-cloud-marketplace-categories.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>google cloud marketplace categories</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-cloud-statistics-report/04-ratio-gauge.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 ratio gauge</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/web-analytics-tools</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/13-collection-methods.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>13 collection methods</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/11-evaluation-criteria.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>11 evaluation criteria</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/01-google-analytics-4.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 google analytics 4</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/02-cloudflare-web-analytics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 cloudflare web analytics</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/03-yandex-metrica.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 yandex metrica</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/04-plausible.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 plausible</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/15-plausible-migrations.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>15 plausible migrations</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/05-posthog.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 posthog</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/16-adobe-decline.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>16 adobe decline</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/07-matomo.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 matomo</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/08-fathom-analytics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 fathom analytics</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/09-umami.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>09 umami</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/14-finding-card.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>14 finding card</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-analytics-tools/12-decision-flow.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>12 decision flow</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/ai-crawler-list</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-list/ai-crawler-list-bot-directory.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler list bot directory</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-list/ai-crawler-archive-poster.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler archive poster</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-list/03-three-types-of-ai-crawler.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 three types of ai crawler</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-list/04-87-ai-bots-62-user-agents.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 87 ai bots 62 user agents</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-list/05-why-ai-crawlers-visit.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 why ai crawlers visit</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-list/06-missing-from-directory.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 missing from directory</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-list/07-control-tokens-never-crawl.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 control tokens never crawl</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-list/08-no-user-agent-iceberg.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 no user agent iceberg</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-list/09-ai-crawler-traffic-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>09 ai crawler traffic share</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-list/ai-crawler-allow-block-cheat-sheet.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler allow block cheat sheet</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-list/02-selective-blocking.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 selective blocking</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-list/10-self-disclosure.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>10 self disclosure</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/tiktok-statistics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-statistics-cover.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok statistics cover</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-global-audience-reach.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok global audience reach</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-users-worldwide-2000-2040.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok users worldwide 2000 2040</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/social-platform-mau-2022-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>social platform mau 2022 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-penetration-by-country-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok penetration by country 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-web-footprint-app-first.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok web footprint app first</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-website-detection-firmographics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok website detection firmographics</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-in-app-purchase-revenue-2018-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok in app purchase revenue 2018 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-quarterly-downloads-2018-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok quarterly downloads 2018 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-downloads-by-country-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok downloads by country 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/average-video-views-by-platform-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>average video views by platform 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-creator-economy-earnings.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok creator economy earnings</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/highest-paid-tiktok-stars-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>highest paid tiktok stars 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-marketer-platform-choice.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok marketer platform choice</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-accounts-removed-by-reason.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok accounts removed by reason</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-us-ban-uncertainty.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok us ban uncertainty</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-ban-creator-alternatives-us-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok ban creator alternatives us 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/tiktok-statistics/tiktok-ban-support-by-party-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>tiktok ban support by party 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/hubspot-statistics-trends-insights-and-hubspot-market-share</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/hubspot-statistics-trends-insights-and-hubspot-market-share/hubspot-emblem-cover.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>hubspot emblem cover</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/hubspot-statistics-trends-insights-and-hubspot-market-share/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/hubspot-statistics-trends-insights-and-hubspot-market-share/hubspot-revenue-financial-growth.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>hubspot revenue financial growth</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/hubspot-statistics-trends-insights-and-hubspot-market-share/hubspot-marketing-automation-market-share-card.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>hubspot marketing automation market share card</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/hubspot-statistics-trends-insights-and-hubspot-market-share/hubspot-active-domains-growth-card.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>hubspot active domains growth card</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/hubspot-statistics-trends-insights-and-hubspot-market-share/hubspot-company-size-card.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>hubspot company size card</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/hubspot-statistics-trends-insights-and-hubspot-market-share/hubspot-wordpress-overlap-card.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>hubspot wordpress overlap card</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/hubspot-statistics-trends-insights-and-hubspot-market-share/hubspot-notable-enterprise-companies.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>hubspot notable enterprise companies</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/hubspot-statistics-trends-insights-and-hubspot-market-share/hubspot-user-reviews-sentiment.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>hubspot user reviews sentiment</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/hubspot-statistics-trends-insights-and-hubspot-market-share/hubspot-awards-recognition.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>hubspot awards recognition</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/firefox-market-share</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/firefox-market-share/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/firefox-market-share/01-firefox-fourth-browser-lineup.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 firefox fourth browser lineup</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/firefox-market-share/02-firefox-flat-line-trend.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 firefox flat line trend</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/firefox-market-share/03-firefox-flat-line-illusion.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 firefox flat line illusion</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/firefox-market-share/04-nobodys-default.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 nobodys default</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/firefox-market-share/05-firefox-desktop-vs-mobile.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 firefox desktop vs mobile</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/firefox-market-share/06-firefox-europe-globe.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 firefox europe globe</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/firefox-market-share/07-firefox-losing-linux.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 firefox losing linux</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/firefox-market-share/08-gecko-last-independent-engine.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 gecko last independent engine</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/firefox-market-share/09-firefox-what-to-do-mindmap.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>09 firefox what to do mindmap</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/https-adoption</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/https-adoption/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/https-adoption/01-https-bot-gap.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 https bot gap</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/https-adoption/02-https-unencrypted-inverted.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 https unencrypted inverted</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/https-adoption/03-denominator-problem.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 denominator problem</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/https-adoption/04-https-denominator-comparison.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 https denominator comparison</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/https-adoption/05-broken-tls-certificates.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 broken tls certificates</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/https-adoption/06-https-country-compression.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 https country compression</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/https-adoption/07-https-wealth-myth.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 https wealth myth</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/https-adoption/08-china-https-outlier.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 china https outlier</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/https-adoption/09-https-plateau.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>09 https plateau</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/https-adoption/10-post-quantum-gap.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>10 post quantum gap</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/webflow-to-nextjs</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/webflow-to-nextjs/00-cover.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 cover</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/webflow-to-nextjs/01-why-migrate.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 why migrate</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/webflow-to-nextjs/webflow-vs-nextjs-comparison.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>webflow vs nextjs comparison</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/webflow-to-nextjs/infographic-1.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>infographic 1</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/webflow-to-nextjs/infographic-3.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>infographic 3</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/webflow-to-nextjs/infographic-2.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>infographic 2</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/webflow-to-nextjs/infographic-5.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>infographic 5</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/webflow-to-nextjs/infographic-4.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>infographic 4</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/webflow-to-nextjs/infographic-6.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>infographic 6</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/webflow-to-nextjs/02-migration-path.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 migration path</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/webflow-to-nextjs/03-challenges.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 challenges</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/webflow-to-nextjs/04-choose-partner.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 choose partner</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/webflow-to-nextjs/infographic-7.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>infographic 7</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/ai-crawler-statistics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-statistics/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-statistics/ai-crawler-take-vs-give-back.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler take vs give back</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-statistics/ai-crawl-purpose-donut-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawl purpose donut 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-statistics/ai-crawl-trend-movers-12-week.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawl trend movers 12 week</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-statistics/most-crawled-platforms-detection.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>most crawled platforms detection</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-statistics/search-crawls-can-cite-you.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>search crawls can cite you</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-statistics/ai-crawler-vs-search-bot-comparison.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler vs search bot comparison</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-crawler-statistics/ai-crawler-three-rules-playbook.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler three rules playbook</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/bot-traffic-statistics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/bot-traffic-statistics/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/bot-traffic-statistics/01-extraction-gap.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 extraction gap</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/bot-traffic-statistics/02-operator-league.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 operator league</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/bot-traffic-statistics/03-busiest-bots.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 busiest bots</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/bot-traffic-statistics/06-ai-crawl-training-vs-search.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 ai crawl training vs search</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/bot-traffic-statistics/04-bot-traffic-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 bot traffic by country</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/bot-traffic-statistics/05-humans-vs-bots-browser.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 humans vs bots browser</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/bot-traffic-statistics/07-crawler-block-rate.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 crawler block rate</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/bot-traffic-statistics/08-good-vs-bad-bots.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 good vs bad bots</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-uk</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-uk/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-uk/02-three-sources.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 three sources</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-uk/10-radar-vs-statcounter.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>10 radar vs statcounter</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-uk/01-mobile-share-by-traffic-type.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 mobile share by traffic type</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-uk/03-device-trend-2025-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 device trend 2025 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-uk/04-uk-vs-world.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 uk vs world</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-uk/05-uk-os-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 uk os share</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-uk/06-uk-browser-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 uk browser share</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-uk/08-uk-internet-speed.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 uk internet speed</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-uk/09-mobile-first-design.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>09 mobile first design</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-uk/07-mobile-first-takeaway.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 mobile first takeaway</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/certificate-authority-market-share</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/certificate-authority-market-share/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/certificate-authority-market-share/01-lets-encrypt-detection.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 lets encrypt detection</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/certificate-authority-market-share/02-one-ca-four-numbers.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 one ca four numbers</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/certificate-authority-market-share/03-market-flip-2015-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 market flip 2015 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/certificate-authority-market-share/05-free-vs-paid.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 free vs paid</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/certificate-authority-market-share/06-short-lived-certs.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 short lived certs</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/certificate-authority-market-share/07-ct-detection-flow.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 ct detection flow</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/chrome-market-share</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chrome-market-share/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chrome-market-share/chart-01-headline-stats.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 01 headline stats</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chrome-market-share/chart-02-global-share-donut.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 02 global share donut</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chrome-market-share/chart-03-os-breakdown.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 03 os breakdown</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chrome-market-share/chart-04-apple-iphone-vs-mac.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 04 apple iphone vs mac</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chrome-market-share/chart-05-country-ranking.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 05 country ranking</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chrome-market-share/chart-06-mobile-vs-desktop.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 06 mobile vs desktop</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chrome-market-share/chart-07-chromium-engine.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chart 07 chromium engine</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chrome-market-share/06-test-the-outlier.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 test the outlier</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/technology-detection-methods</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-detection-methods/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-detection-methods/02-detection-methods-overview.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 detection methods overview</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-detection-methods/01-frontend-detection.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 frontend detection</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-detection-methods/03-backend-detection.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 backend detection</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-detection-methods/10-signal-migration-data.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>10 signal migration data</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-detection-methods/05-fetch-vs-browser-detection.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 fetch vs browser detection</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-detection-methods/04-crawl-at-scale.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 crawl at scale</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-detection-methods/07-confidence-scoring.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 confidence scoring</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-detection-methods/06-enrichment-bloom.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 enrichment bloom</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-detection-methods/09-job-postings-stack-signals.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>09 job postings stack signals</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-detection-methods/08-gtm-plays.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 gtm plays</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/instagram-user-statistics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-user-statistics-cover.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram user statistics cover</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-three-ways-to-count-users.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram three ways to count users</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-emerging-market-street-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram emerging market street 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-penetration-by-country-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram penetration by country 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-gender-split-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram gender split 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-daily-use-photo-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram daily use photo 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-daily-use-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram daily use 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-engagement-by-format-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram engagement by format 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-revenue-estimates-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram revenue estimates 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-smb-product-photography-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram smb product photography 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/facebook-pixel-vs-instagram-embed-footprint.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>facebook pixel vs instagram embed footprint</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-features-to-connect.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram features to connect</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-statistics-data-driven-intro.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram statistics data driven intro</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-2026-numbers-reports-get-wrong.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram 2026 numbers reports get wrong</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-three-ways-to-count-users-card.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram three ways to count users card</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/biggest-social-networks-2025-mau-card.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>biggest social networks 2025 mau card</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-growth-trajectory-2019-2028-card.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram growth trajectory 2019 2028 card</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-users-by-country-2025-card.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram users by country 2025 card</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-age-demographics-2025-card.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram age demographics 2025 card</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-gender-flip-global-vs-us-card.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram gender flip global vs us card</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-daily-active-users-time-spent-card.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram daily active users time spent card</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/instagram-user-statistics/instagram-best-performing-content-formats-card.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>instagram best performing content formats card</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/data-center-market-statistics-ai</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/data-center-market-statistics/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/data-center-market-statistics/ai-data-center-market-segment-2034-forecast.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai data center market segment 2034 forecast</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/data-center-market-statistics/nvidia-data-center-revenue-65x-growth.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>nvidia data center revenue 65x growth</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/data-center-market-statistics/ai-data-center-demand-cloud-concentration.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai data center demand cloud concentration</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/data-center-market-statistics/cloud-infrastructure-footprint-hyperscalers.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cloud infrastructure footprint hyperscalers</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/data-center-market-statistics/europe-data-center-power-colocation-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>europe data center power colocation share</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/data-center-market-statistics/data-center-investment-supercycle-winners.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>data center investment supercycle winners</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/safari-market-share</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/safari-market-share/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/safari-market-share/01-safari-second-browser-lineup.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 safari second browser lineup</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/safari-market-share/02-safari-share-decline-trend.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 safari share decline trend</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/safari-market-share/03-safari-share-by-country-globe.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 safari share by country globe</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/safari-market-share/04-browser-market-share-breakdown.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 browser market share breakdown</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/safari-market-share/05-safari-mobile-vs-desktop.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 safari mobile vs desktop</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/safari-market-share/06-safari-by-country-device-grid.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 safari by country device grid</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/safari-market-share/apple-os-vs-safari-share-comparison.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>apple os vs safari share comparison</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/safari-market-share/safari-vs-chrome-ios-macos-comparison.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>safari vs chrome ios macos comparison</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/safari-market-share/why-safari-keeps-market-share-mindmap.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>why safari keeps market share mindmap</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/ai-in-marketing-statistics-use-cases</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-in-marketing-statistics-use-cases/ai-in-marketing-statistics-cover.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai in marketing statistics cover</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-in-marketing-statistics-use-cases/ai-marketing-scaling-faster-than-trust.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai marketing scaling faster than trust</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-in-marketing-statistics-use-cases/ai-marketing-tools-deployment-gap.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai marketing tools deployment gap</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-in-marketing-statistics-use-cases/ai-tools-deployed-live-websites-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai tools deployed live websites 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-in-marketing-statistics-use-cases/marketing-platforms-running-ai-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>marketing platforms running ai 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-in-marketing-statistics-use-cases/ai-marketing-roi-workflow-automation.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai marketing roi workflow automation</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-in-marketing-statistics-use-cases/ai-marketing-high-roi-use-cases.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai marketing high roi use cases</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-in-marketing-statistics-use-cases/ai-search-crawlers-brand-visibility.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai search crawlers brand visibility</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-in-marketing-statistics-use-cases/ai-crawler-traffic-share-q2-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler traffic share q2 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-in-marketing-statistics-use-cases/ai-marketing-2026-playbook-process.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai marketing 2026 playbook process</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/influencer-marketing-statistics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/influencer-marketing-statistics/influencer-marketing-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>influencer marketing 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/influencer-marketing-statistics/influencer-data-three-sources.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>influencer data three sources</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/influencer-marketing-statistics/influencer-marketing-roi.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>influencer marketing roi</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/influencer-marketing-statistics/ai-influencer-creator-collaboration.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai influencer creator collaboration</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/influencer-marketing-statistics/how-to-apply-influencer-marketing.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>how to apply influencer marketing</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/social-media-advertising-marketing-insights</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/social-media-advertising-marketing-insights/social-media-advertising-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>social media advertising 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/social-media-advertising-marketing-insights/social-media-market-leaders-brand-value.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>social media market leaders brand value</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/social-media-advertising-marketing-insights/social-advertising-three-data-lenses-mindmap.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>social advertising three data lenses mindmap</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/social-media-advertising-marketing-insights/social-advertising-pixel-tracking-web.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>social advertising pixel tracking web</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/social-media-advertising-marketing-insights/social-advertising-attention-vs-budget.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>social advertising attention vs budget</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/social-media-advertising-marketing-insights/social-media-marketing-funnel-benefits.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>social media marketing funnel benefits</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/social-media-advertising-marketing-insights/global-social-media-audience-growth.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>global social media audience growth</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/social-media-advertising-marketing-insights/meta-owned-social-platforms.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>meta owned social platforms</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/social-media-advertising-marketing-insights/social-advertising-2026-playbook-process.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>social advertising 2026 playbook process</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/eu-ecommerce-three-data-views-mindmap.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>eu ecommerce three data views mindmap</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/eu-online-retail-456b-and-climbing.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>eu online retail 456b and climbing</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/eu-b2c-ecommerce-revenue-2020-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>eu b2c ecommerce revenue 2020 2030</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/eu-ecommerce-penetration-rate-2020-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>eu ecommerce penetration rate 2020 2030</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/eu-ecommerce-users-2020-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>eu ecommerce users 2020 2030</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/eu-ecommerce-users-251m-to-310m-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>eu ecommerce users 251m to 310m 2030</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/eu-ecommerce-sales-by-device-2020-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>eu ecommerce sales by device 2020 2030</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/mobile-share-uneven-germany-france-italy.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>mobile share uneven germany france italy</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/ecommerce-revenue-by-country-2017-2029.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ecommerce revenue by country 2017 2029</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/ecommerce-users-by-country-2017-2029.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ecommerce users by country 2017 2029</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/ecommerce-penetration-rate-by-country-2017-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ecommerce penetration rate by country 2017 2030</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/eurostat-online-purchases-by-country-2023.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>eurostat online purchases by country 2023</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/cross-border-ecommerce-share-by-country-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cross border ecommerce share by country 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/ecommerce-platform-leaderboard-flips-europe.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ecommerce platform leaderboard flips europe</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/france-prestashop-beats-shopify-3-6-to-1.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>france prestashop beats shopify 3 6 to 1</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/ecommerce-share-enterprise-revenue-eu-2016-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ecommerce share enterprise revenue eu 2016 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/ecommerce-revenue-share-companies-by-country-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ecommerce revenue share companies by country 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/manufacturing-enterprises-online-selling-by-country-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>manufacturing enterprises online selling by country 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/sme-ecommerce-sales-eu-2014-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>sme ecommerce sales eu 2014 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/sme-ecommerce-sales-by-country-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>sme ecommerce sales by country 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/sme-b2b-b2g-ecommerce-sales-eu-2014-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>sme b2b b2g ecommerce sales eu 2014 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/no-single-checkout-serves-all-europe.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>no single checkout serves all europe</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/europe-ecommerce-payment-methods-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>europe ecommerce payment methods 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/credit-card-market-share-europe-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>credit card market share europe 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/ecdb-payment-methods-top-10-eu-markets-2023.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ecdb payment methods top 10 eu markets 2023</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/a2a-payments-europe-2016-2030.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>a2a payments europe 2016 2030</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/delivery-preferences-europe-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>delivery preferences europe 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/two-day-delivery-expectations-by-category-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>two day delivery expectations by category 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/out-of-home-delivery-challenges-europe-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>out of home delivery challenges europe 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/online-shopping-frequency-by-category-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>online shopping frequency by category 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/cross-border-product-categories-europe-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cross border product categories europe 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/charts/europe-cart-abandonment-reasons-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>europe cart abandonment reasons 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/most-used-shopping-technologies-europe-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>most used shopping technologies europe 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/most-useful-shopping-technologies-europe-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>most useful shopping technologies europe 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/statista/luxury-ecommerce-factors-europe-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>luxury ecommerce factors europe 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/shopping-most-ai-crawled-web-vertical.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>shopping most ai crawled web vertical</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/e-commerce-in-europe-statistics/ecommerce-ai-crawler-allow-block-comparison.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ecommerce ai crawler allow block comparison</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/open-source-ai-adoption</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/open-source-ai-adoption/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/open-source-ai-adoption/01-open-vs-closed.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 open vs closed</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/open-source-ai-adoption/02-supply-vs-deployment.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 supply vs deployment</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/open-source-ai-adoption/stanford/stanford-github-ai-projects-2011-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>stanford github ai projects 2011 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/open-source-ai-adoption/stanford/stanford-huggingface-models-datasets-2022-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>stanford huggingface models datasets 2022 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/open-source-ai-adoption/04-agents-flooding-supply.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 agents flooding supply</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/open-source-ai-adoption/03-structural-invisibility.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 structural invisibility</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/open-source-ai-adoption/open-source-ai-invisible-to-detection-causes.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>open source ai invisible to detection causes</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/open-source-ai-adoption/open-source-ai-momentum-timeline-2025-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>open source ai momentum timeline 2025 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/ai-market-size-statistics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-market-size-statistics/cover-global-ai-market-spiral.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cover global ai market spiral</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-market-size-statistics/section-market-growth-trajectory.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>section market growth trajectory</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-market-size-statistics/infographic-forecast-disagreement.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>infographic forecast disagreement</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-market-size-statistics/infographic-forecast-range.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>infographic forecast range</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-market-size-statistics/section-unicorn-births-growth.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>section unicorn births growth</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-market-size-statistics/section-global-adoption-network.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>section global adoption network</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-market-size-statistics/section-segments-portfolio.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>section segments portfolio</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-market-size-statistics/diagram-segments-2024-2031.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>diagram segments 2024 2031</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-market-size-statistics/section-workforce-upskilling.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>section workforce upskilling</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-market-size-statistics/section-generative-ai-explosion.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>section generative ai explosion</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-market-size-statistics/section-forecast-vs-deployment.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>section forecast vs deployment</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-market-size-statistics/diagram-five-takeaways.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>diagram five takeaways</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-market-size-statistics/diagram-source-attribution-chain.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>diagram source attribution chain</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/claude-statistics-insights</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/claude-statistics-insights/claude-cover.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>claude cover</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/claude-statistics-insights/02-claudebot-vs-gptbot-monthly-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 claudebot vs gptbot monthly 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/claude-statistics-insights/claude-2026-ten-key-numbers.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>claude 2026 ten key numbers</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/claude-statistics-insights/anthropic-revenue-growth-2024-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>anthropic revenue growth 2024 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/claude-statistics-insights/anthropic-series-g-largest-private-tech-round.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>anthropic series g largest private tech round</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/claude-statistics-insights/claude-model-release-cadence-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>claude model release cadence 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/claude-statistics-insights/claude-searchbot-debut-may-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>claude searchbot debut may 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/claude-statistics-insights/05-genai-rankings-may-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 genai rankings may 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/claude-statistics-insights/06-crawl-to-referral-ratios.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 crawl to referral ratios</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/claude-statistics-insights/claude-code-developer-adoption-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>claude code developer adoption 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/claude-statistics-insights/claude-code-2-5b-revenue-nine-months.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>claude code 2 5b revenue nine months</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/claude-statistics-insights/ai-crawl-patterns-by-country-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawl patterns by country 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/claude-statistics-insights/claude-usage-scale-mobile-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>claude usage scale mobile 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/claude-statistics-insights/ai-leaders-strategic-decisions-claude-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai leaders strategic decisions claude 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/ecommerce-turkey-statistics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/seedream/turkey-ecommerce-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>turkey ecommerce hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/seedream/turkey-ecommerce-growth-staircase.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>turkey ecommerce growth staircase</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/seedream/turkey-ecommerce-global-ranking.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>turkey ecommerce global ranking</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/seedream/turkey-ecommerce-retail-share-growth.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>turkey ecommerce retail share growth</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/napkin/sector-hierarchy.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>sector hierarchy</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/seedream/turkey-ecommerce-demographics-bullseye.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>turkey ecommerce demographics bullseye</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/seedream/turkey-ecommerce-day-night-clock.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>turkey ecommerce day night clock</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/seedream/turkey-ecommerce-campaign-peak.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>turkey ecommerce campaign peak</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/napkin/campaign-calendar.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>campaign calendar</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/seedream/turkey-ecommerce-regional-concentration.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>turkey ecommerce regional concentration</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/napkin/payment-flow.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>payment flow</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/seedream/turkey-ecommerce-purchase-drivers-magnet.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>turkey ecommerce purchase drivers magnet</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/seedream/turkey-ecommerce-market-leader-podium.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>turkey ecommerce market leader podium</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/seedream/turkey-ecommerce-quick-commerce.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>turkey ecommerce quick commerce</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/turkey-ecommerce-statistics/seedream/turkey-ecommerce-cloudflare-radar-pulse.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>turkey ecommerce cloudflare radar pulse</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics-cover.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>gen z uk social media statistics cover</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/uk-gen-z-digital-native-coming-of-age.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>uk gen z digital native coming of age</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/napkin-uk-generations-population-hierarchy-2023.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>napkin uk generations population hierarchy 2023</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/uk-gen-z-financial-anxiety-smartphone.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>uk gen z financial anxiety smartphone</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/uk-gen-z-night-bus-phone-glow.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>uk gen z night bus phone glow</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/uk-mobile-time-spent-per-day.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>uk mobile time spent per day</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/uk-gen-z-mobile-first-social-media.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>uk gen z mobile first social media</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/napkin-gen-z-social-media-platforms-tier-list.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>napkin gen z social media platforms tier list</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/gen-z-content-creator-economy-influence.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>gen z content creator economy influence</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/uk-gen-z-fast-fashion-haul-resale.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>uk gen z fast fashion haul resale</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/uk-gen-z-ad-recall-video-beats-tv.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>uk gen z ad recall video beats tv</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/uk-gen-z-pick-and-mix-ethics-shopping.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>uk gen z pick and mix ethics shopping</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/napkin-uk-gen-z-shopping-pick-and-mix-cycle.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>napkin uk gen z shopping pick and mix cycle</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/shein-temu-uk-fast-commerce-surge.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>shein temu uk fast commerce surge</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/vinted-uk-secondhand-fashion-recommerce.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>vinted uk secondhand fashion recommerce</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/napkin-uk-children-smartphone-progression.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>napkin uk children smartphone progression</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/uk-parents-smartphone-ban-debate.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>uk parents smartphone ban debate</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/gen-alpha-uk-ai-chatgpt-kids.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>gen alpha uk ai chatgpt kids</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/uk-ai-crawlers-reading-content.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>uk ai crawlers reading content</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/napkin-uk-ai-bot-traffic-share-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>napkin uk ai bot traffic share q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/napkin-uk-ai-crawl-purpose-breakdown.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>napkin uk ai crawl purpose breakdown</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/uk-mobile-os-majority-reversal-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>uk mobile os majority reversal 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/uk-ai-crawler-share-yoy-2025-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>uk ai crawler share yoy 2025 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/uk-bot-traffic-data-centre-aisle.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>uk bot traffic data centre aisle</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/gen-z-uk-social-media-statistics/uk-gen-z-marketer-takeaways.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>uk gen z marketer takeaways</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/technology-trends</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-trends/generated/featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-trends/statista/technologychecker-data-callout.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>technologychecker data callout</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-trends/generated/agentic-ai-concept.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>agentic ai concept</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-trends/generated/memory-heart-concept.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>memory heart concept</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-trends/generated/nuclear-datacenter-concept.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>nuclear datacenter concept</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/mobile-internet-usage-by-country</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-internet-usage-by-country/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-internet-usage-by-country/01-global-split.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 global split</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-internet-usage-by-country/02-top10-mobile.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 top10 mobile</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-internet-usage-by-country/03-top10-desktop.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 top10 desktop</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-internet-usage-by-country/04-timeseries.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 timeseries</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-internet-usage-by-country/05-mom-shifts.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 mom shifts</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-internet-usage-by-country/06-factors-note.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 factors note</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/mobile-internet-usage-by-country/07-saas-implications.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 saas implications</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/most-reliable-internet-by-country</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-reliable-internet-by-country/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-reliable-internet-by-country/02-reliability-vs-speed-note.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 reliability vs speed note</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-reliable-internet-by-country/01-tcp-reset-types.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 tcp reset types</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-reliable-internet-by-country/07-speed-misleads-note.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 speed misleads note</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-reliable-internet-by-country/08-build-reliable-apps.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 build reliable apps</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/search-engine-market-share</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/search-engine-market-share/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/search-engine-market-share/search-market-two-questions.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>search market two questions</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/search-engine-market-share/traditional-search-value-loop.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>traditional search value loop</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/search-engine-market-share/why-publishers-block-ai-crawlers.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>why publishers block ai crawlers</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/dnssec-adoption</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dnssec-adoption/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dnssec-adoption/01-how-dnssec-works.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 how dnssec works</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dnssec-adoption/02-adoption-reality.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 adoption reality</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dnssec-adoption/03-signing-gap.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 signing gap</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dnssec-adoption/04-trend-line.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 trend line</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dnssec-adoption/05-country-leaders.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 country leaders</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dnssec-adoption/06-barriers-note.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 barriers note</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dnssec-adoption/07-worth-it-note.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 worth it note</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dnssec-adoption/08-saas-signal-note.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 saas signal note</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/ecommerce-marketplace-market-share</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ecommerce-marketplace-market-share/ecommerce-marketplace-market-share-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ecommerce marketplace market share q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ecommerce-marketplace-market-share/global-marketplace-traffic-rankings-overview.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>global marketplace traffic rankings overview</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ecommerce-marketplace-market-share/q1-2026-marketplace-rankings-three-categories.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>q1 2026 marketplace rankings three categories</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ecommerce-marketplace-market-share/marketplace-vs-ecommerce-platform-traffic-models.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>marketplace vs ecommerce platform traffic models</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ecommerce-marketplace-market-share/marketplaces-spanning-multiple-categories-venn.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>marketplaces spanning multiple categories venn</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ecommerce-marketplace-market-share/regional-marketplace-dominance-us-de-id-br.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>regional marketplace dominance us de id br</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/marketing-technology-statistics-martech</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/martech-cover-new.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>martech cover new</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/martech-market-size-revenue-2021-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>martech market size revenue 2021 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/martech-mergers-acquisitions-2020-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>martech mergers acquisitions 2020 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/martech-consolidation-acquisition-lifecycle-flowchart.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>martech consolidation acquisition lifecycle flowchart</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/marketing-analytics-market-share-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>marketing analytics market share 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/martech-platforms-deployed-organizations-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>martech platforms deployed organizations 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/marketing-budget-distribution-segment-2017-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>marketing budget distribution segment 2017 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/martech-professional-responsibilities-seniority.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>martech professional responsibilities seniority</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/cmo-skills-priorities-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cmo skills priorities 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/martech-perception-platform-owners-stakeholders.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>martech perception platform owners stakeholders</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/martech-organizational-priorities-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>martech organizational priorities 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/martech-leading-challenges-cmos-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>martech leading challenges cmos 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/martech-shelfware-root-causes-fishbone.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>martech shelfware root causes fishbone</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/ai-marketing-section.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai marketing section</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/ai-trends-impacting-marketing-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai trends impacting marketing 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/martech-platforms-utilizing-ai-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>martech platforms utilizing ai 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/confidence-evaluating-ai-martech-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>confidence evaluating ai martech 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/ai-desired-outcomes-marketers-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai desired outcomes marketers 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/marketing-automation-market-size-2023-2032.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>marketing automation market size 2023 2032</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/marketing-automation-market-share-providers-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>marketing automation market share providers 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/automation-areas-marketers-use-most-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>automation areas marketers use most 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/b2b-marketing-automation-goals-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>b2b marketing automation goals 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/b2b-marketing-automation-challenges-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>b2b marketing automation challenges 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/ai-effective-uses-marketing-automation-b2b.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai effective uses marketing automation b2b</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/cloud-saas-revenue-by-region-2021-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cloud saas revenue by region 2021 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/saas-annual-expenditures-worldwide-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>saas annual expenditures worldwide 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/saas-industries-by-funding-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>saas industries by funding 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/saas-emerging-trends-impact-2023.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>saas emerging trends impact 2023</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/cdp-industry-revenue-2020-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cdp industry revenue 2020 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/cdp-funding-by-region-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cdp funding by region 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/cdp-vendors-worldwide-2016-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cdp vendors worldwide 2016 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-technology-statistics/statista/cdp-employees-by-region-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cdp employees by region 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/chatgpt-statistics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chatgpt-statistics/chatgpt-statistics-cover.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>chatgpt statistics cover</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chatgpt-statistics/01-key-highlights.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 key highlights</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chatgpt-statistics/04-traffic-engagement.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 traffic engagement</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chatgpt-statistics/world-wide-visits-chatgpt.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>world wide visits chatgpt</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chatgpt-statistics/17-conversion-rate-seer.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>17 conversion rate seer</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chatgpt-statistics/06-crawl-data.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 crawl data</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chatgpt-statistics/12-dual-platform.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>12 dual platform</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chatgpt-statistics/08-enterprise-adoption.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 enterprise adoption</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/chatgpt-statistics/13-enterprise-sectors.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>13 enterprise sectors</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/web-traffic-statistics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/web-traffic-statistics-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>web traffic statistics q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/bot-traffic-split-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>bot traffic split q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/bot-vs-human-traffic-trend-2019-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>bot vs human traffic trend 2019 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/bot-traffic-overtaking-humans-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>bot traffic overtaking humans 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/ai-crawler-rankings-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler rankings q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/ai-crawler-purpose-shift-training-scraping.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler purpose shift training scraping</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/applebot-surge-ai-crawlers.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>applebot surge ai crawlers</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/robots-txt-blocking-arms-race.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>robots txt blocking arms race</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/robots-txt-ai-crawler-blocking-rates.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>robots txt ai crawler blocking rates</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/security-threats-credential-stuffing-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>security threats credential stuffing q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/email-threat-categories-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>email threat categories q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/ddos-attack-breakdown-l3-l7-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ddos attack breakdown l3 l7 q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/protocol-adoption-tls-http3.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>protocol adoption tls http3</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/http-version-adoption-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>http version adoption q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/certificate-trends-lets-encrypt.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>certificate trends lets encrypt</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/web-traffic-implications-saas-teams.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>web traffic implications saas teams</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/web-traffic-statistics/web-traffic-trends-watching-next.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>web traffic trends watching next</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/dmarc-adoption-statistics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dmarc-adoption-statistics/dmarc-adoption-statistics-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>dmarc adoption statistics q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dmarc-adoption-statistics/email-authentication-pass-rates-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>email authentication pass rates q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dmarc-adoption-statistics/email-auth-yoy-comparison-2025-vs-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>email auth yoy comparison 2025 vs 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dmarc-adoption-statistics/spf-authentication-fragility.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>spf authentication fragility</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dmarc-adoption-statistics/email-encryption-in-transit-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>email encryption in transit q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dmarc-adoption-statistics/email-tls-version-distribution-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>email tls version distribution q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dmarc-adoption-statistics/email-spoof-rate-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>email spoof rate q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dmarc-adoption-statistics/arc-forwarding-authentication-loss.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>arc forwarding authentication loss</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/dmarc-adoption-statistics/dmarc-maturity-requirements.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>dmarc maturity requirements</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/http-protocol-adoption</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/http-protocol-adoption/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/http-protocol-adoption/01-protocol-landscape.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 protocol landscape</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/http-protocol-adoption/02-90day-trend.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 90day trend</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/http-protocol-adoption/03-quic-plateau.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 quic plateau</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/http-protocol-adoption/04-country-ranking.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 country ranking</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/http-protocol-adoption/05-datacenter-paradox.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 datacenter paradox</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/http-protocol-adoption/06-tls-correlation.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 tls correlation</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/http-protocol-adoption/07-https-vs-http1.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 https vs http1</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/http-protocol-adoption/08-performance-tax.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 performance tax</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/http-protocol-adoption/09-sales-signal.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>09 sales signal</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/http-protocol-adoption/10-key-takeaways.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>10 key takeaways</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/internet-outage-report-insights</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/internet-outage-report-insights/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/internet-outage-report-insights/01-q1-overview.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 q1 overview</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/internet-outage-report-insights/10-monthly-breakdown.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>10 monthly breakdown</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/internet-outage-report-insights/02-iran-shutdown.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 iran shutdown</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/internet-outage-report-insights/03-aws-middle-east.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 aws middle east</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/internet-outage-report-insights/12-aws-sla-gap.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>12 aws sla gap</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/internet-outage-report-insights/04-cuba-blackouts.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 cuba blackouts</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/internet-outage-report-insights/05-other-disruptions.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 other disruptions</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/internet-outage-report-insights/06-pattern-analysis.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 pattern analysis</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/internet-outage-report-insights/07-cause-breakdown.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 cause breakdown</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/internet-outage-report-insights/11-duration-by-cause.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>11 duration by cause</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/internet-outage-report-insights/08-business-impact.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 business impact</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/internet-outage-report-insights/09-resilience.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>09 resilience</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/ai-adaption-trends-data-insights</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-adaption-trends-data-insights/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-adaption-trends-data-insights/01-four-layer-model.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 four layer model</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-adaption-trends-data-insights/02-domain-gold-rush.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 domain gold rush</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-adaption-trends-data-insights/03-chatgpt-global-rank.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 chatgpt global rank</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-adaption-trends-data-insights/04-bot-ecosystem.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 bot ecosystem</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-adaption-trends-data-insights/07-meta-crawler-surge.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 meta crawler surge</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-adaption-trends-data-insights/05-genai-rankings.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 genai rankings</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-adaption-trends-data-insights/08-deepseek-rocket-rise.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 deepseek rocket rise</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-adaption-trends-data-insights/09-gemini-crown-falling.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>09 gemini crown falling</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-adaption-trends-data-insights/06-gtm-insights.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 gtm insights</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ai-adaption-trends-data-insights/10-production-gap-bridge.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>10 production gap bridge</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>robots txt ai crawlers blocking q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/ai-crawler-disallow-rankings-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler disallow rankings q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/ai-crawl-to-refer-ratio-comparison.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawl to refer ratio comparison</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/ai-bot-traffic-share-breakdown.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai bot traffic share breakdown</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/ai-crawler-purpose-breakdown.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler purpose breakdown</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/ai-crawler-industry-targeting.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler industry targeting</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/ai-crawler-blocking-trends-q1-2026.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler blocking trends q1 2026</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/ai-crawlers-allowed-vs-blocked.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawlers allowed vs blocked</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/complete-ai-crawler-user-agents-list.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>complete ai crawler user agents list</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/common-robotstxt-mistakes.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>common robotstxt mistakes</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/robotstxt-vs-firewall-enforcement.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>robotstxt vs firewall enforcement</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/llmstxt-vs-robotstxt-comparison.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>llmstxt vs robotstxt comparison</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/ai-crawler-decision-framework.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler decision framework</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/ai-crawler-benchmarks-dashboard.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai crawler benchmarks dashboard</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/robots-txt-ai-crawlers-blocking-report/multi-signal-technology-detection.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>multi signal technology detection</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share/01-big-three-traffic.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 big three traffic</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share/02-extended-ecosystem.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 extended ecosystem</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share/03-regional-cloud-map.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 regional cloud map</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share/03a-na-stronghold.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03a na stronghold</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share/03b-europe-sovereignty.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03b europe sovereignty</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share/03c-asia-mobile.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03c asia mobile</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share/04-workload-regions.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 workload regions</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share/04b-useast1-gravity.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04b useast1 gravity</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share/04c-google-global.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04c google global</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share/05-geographic-dna.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 geographic dna</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share/06-region-count.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 region count</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share/07-yoy-growth.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 yoy growth</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/cloud-provider-traffic-share/08-what-numbers-mean.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 what numbers mean</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/12-june-refresh-cover.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>12 june refresh cover</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/15-june-reversals.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>15 june reversals</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/06-methodology.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 methodology</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/18-dns-method-source.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>18 dns method source</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/01-power-map-overview.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 power map overview</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/02-ai-race-rankings.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 ai race rankings</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/03-facebook-dominance.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 facebook dominance</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/04-ecommerce-rankings.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 ecommerce rankings</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/05-shopee-paradox.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 shopee paradox</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/07-gaming-rankings.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 gaming rankings</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/08-brazil-news.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 brazil news</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/09-stripe-infrastructure.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>09 stripe infrastructure</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/10-static-categories.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>10 static categories</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/11-forever-number-one.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>11 forever number one</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/13-forever-number-one-64-weeks.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>13 forever number one 64 weeks</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/16-infrastructure-inversion.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>16 infrastructure inversion</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/14-gemini-climb-trajectory.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>14 gemini climb trajectory</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/most-popular-technologies-by-category/17-new-categories.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>17 new categories</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/salesforce-statistics-trends-insights-and-salesforce-market-share</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/cover-salesforce.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>cover salesforce</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/01-executive-summary.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 executive summary</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/03-revenue-financial.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 revenue financial</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/salesforce-revenue-growth-timeline.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>salesforce revenue growth timeline</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/04-market-position.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 market position</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/salesforce-crm-market-share-comparison.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>salesforce crm market share comparison</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/05-growth-trends.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 growth trends</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/06-company-analysis.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 company analysis</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/salesforce-company-size-distribution-pyramid.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>salesforce company size distribution pyramid</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/salesforce-industry-distribution-breakdown.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>salesforce industry distribution breakdown</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/salesforce-geographic-distribution-countries.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>salesforce geographic distribution countries</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/07-migration-trends.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 migration trends</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/salesforce-net-migration-by-platform.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>salesforce net migration by platform</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/08-tech-stack.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 tech stack</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/09-notable-companies.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>09 notable companies</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/10-ai-agentforce.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>10 ai agentforce</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/salesforce-agentforce-ai-key-metrics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>salesforce agentforce ai key metrics</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/salesforce-agentic-web-readiness-gap.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>salesforce agentic web readiness gap</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/11-reviews.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>11 reviews</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/salesforce-g2-reviews-praise-complaints.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>salesforce g2 reviews praise complaints</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/salesforce-statistics/12-recommendations.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>12 recommendations</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights/01-monthly-ssl-issuance.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 monthly ssl issuance</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights/02-ca-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 ca market share</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights/03-top-issuing-cas.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 top issuing cas</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights/04-lets-encrypt-risk.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 lets encrypt risk</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights/05-ca-by-tld.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 ca by tld</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights/06-rsa-vs-ecdsa.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 rsa vs ecdsa</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights/07-certificate-duration.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 certificate duration</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights/08-validation-levels.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 validation levels</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights/09-wildcard-certs.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>09 wildcard certs</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights/10-expiration-patterns.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>10 expiration patterns</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights/11-entry-types.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>11 entry types</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights/12-ct-tech-detection.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>12 ct tech detection</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/ssl-certificate-transparency-report-insights/13-https-seo.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>13 https seo</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/google-analytics-4-migration-insights</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-analytics-4-migration-insights/00-featured-hero.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>00 featured hero</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-analytics-4-migration-insights/01-ga4-adoption-gap.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>01 ga4 adoption gap</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-analytics-4-migration-insights/02-abandonment-reasons.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>02 abandonment reasons</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-analytics-4-migration-insights/03-migration-flow.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>03 migration flow</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-analytics-4-migration-insights/04-seo-complaints.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>04 seo complaints</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-analytics-4-migration-insights/05-ga4-users.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>05 ga4 users</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-analytics-4-migration-insights/06-alternatives.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>06 alternatives</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-analytics-4-migration-insights/07-action-steps.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>07 action steps</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-analytics-4-migration-insights/08-g2-reviews.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>08 g2 reviews</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/google-analytics-4-migration-insights/09-future-trends.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>09 future trends</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>marketing automation report market share trends</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/1.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>1</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/2.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>2</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/marketing-automation-market-growth-explosion.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>marketing automation market growth explosion</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/long-tail-bifurcated-market-adoption.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>long tail bifurcated market adoption</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/regional-market-dynamics-comparison.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>regional market dynamics comparison</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/platform-leaderboard-race-competition.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>platform leaderboard race competition</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/highlevel-agency-distribution-model.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>highlevel agency distribution model</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/highlevel-explosive-growth-timeline.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>highlevel explosive growth timeline</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/rising-challenger-platforms-overview.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>rising challenger platforms overview</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/linkedin-match-rate-platform-ranking.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>linkedin match rate platform ranking</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/platform-company-size-distribution.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>platform company size distribution</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/platform-industry-specialization-map.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>platform industry specialization map</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/industry-specific-automation-patterns.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>industry specific automation patterns</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/hubspot-vs-salesforce-enterprise-battle.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>hubspot vs salesforce enterprise battle</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/platform-migration-patterns-flow.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>platform migration patterns flow</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/marketing-automation-roi-returns.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>marketing automation roi returns</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/invisible-marketing-future-outlook.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>invisible marketing future outlook</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/marketing-automation-report-market-share-trends/strategic-insights-framework.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>strategic insights framework</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/companies-using-n8n</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/companies-using-n8n.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>companies using n8n</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/companies-using-n8n/1.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>1</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/companies-using-n8n/n8n-ai-workflow-orchestration.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>n8n ai workflow orchestration</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/companies-using-n8n/n8n-vs-zapier-comparison.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>n8n vs zapier comparison</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/builtwith-alternatives</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/builtwith-alternatives.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>builtwith alternatives</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/builtwith-alternatives/1.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>1</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/builtwith-alternatives/2.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>2</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/builtwith-alternatives/6.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>6</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/builtwith-alternatives/7.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>7</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/builtwith-alternatives/3.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>3</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/builtwith-alternatives/8.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>8</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/builtwith-alternatives/4.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>4</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/builtwith-alternatives/5.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>5</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/builtwith-alternatives/9.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>9</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>shopify analytics trends insights</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/1.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>1</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/2.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>2</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/statista/ecommerce-platforms-worldwide.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ecommerce platforms worldwide</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/3.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>3</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/statista/us-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>us market share</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/4.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>4</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/statista/stores-by-country.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>stores by country</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/5.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>5</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/statista/revenue-2015-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>revenue 2015 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/statista/revenue-by-segment.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>revenue by segment</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/6.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>6</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/b2b-commerce-growth.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>b2b commerce growth</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/statista/quarterly-gmv.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>quarterly gmv</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/statista/us-gmv.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>us gmv</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/statista/net-income-2020-2024.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>net income 2020 2024</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/statista/market-cap-2015-2025.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>market cap 2015 2025</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/7.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>7</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/traffic-conversion-rates.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>traffic conversion rates</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/8.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>8</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/statista/stores-by-category.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>stores by category</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/app-ecosystem-overview.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>app ecosystem overview</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/top-apps-installs.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>top apps installs</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/technology-stack-adoption.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>technology stack adoption</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/shop-pay-growth.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>shop pay growth</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/statista/shop-app-downloads.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>shop app downloads</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/social-marketing-channels.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>social marketing channels</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/social-platform-adoption.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>social platform adoption</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/store-characteristics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>store characteristics</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/shipping-logistics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>shipping logistics</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/shopify-plus-enterprise.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>shopify plus enterprise</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/themes-design-branding.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>themes design branding</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/theme-adoption-ranking.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>theme adoption ranking</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/migration-trends-flow.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>migration trends flow</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/bfcm-performance-growth.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>bfcm performance growth</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/bfcm-shopping-frenzy.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>bfcm shopping frenzy</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/user-demographics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>user demographics</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/linkedin-merchant-analysis.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>linkedin merchant analysis</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/ai-renaissance-features.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai renaissance features</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-analytics-trends-insights/shopify-dominance-conclusion.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>shopify dominance conclusion</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/technology-lookup-software-industry-statistics-insights</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-lookup-software-industry-statistics-insights.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>technology lookup software industry statistics insights</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-lookup-software-industry-statistics-insights/technology-lookup-concept.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>technology lookup concept</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-lookup-software-industry-statistics-insights/technographics-market-growth.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>technographics market growth</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-lookup-software-industry-statistics-insights/technographic-adoption-impact.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>technographic adoption impact</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-lookup-software-industry-statistics-insights/web-technology-market-share.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>web technology market share</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-lookup-software-industry-statistics-insights/1.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>1</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-lookup-software-industry-statistics-insights/sales-playbook-strategy.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>sales playbook strategy</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-lookup-software-industry-statistics-insights/ai-powered-detection.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>ai powered detection</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-lookup-software-industry-statistics-insights/technographic-use-cases.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>technographic use cases</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-lookup-software-industry-statistics-insights/technology-detection-methods.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>technology detection methods</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/technology-lookup-software-industry-statistics-insights/future-outlook-technographics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>future outlook technographics</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/why-saas-companies-switch-crms</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/why-saas-companies-switch-crms.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>why saas companies switch crms</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/why-saas-companies-switch-crms/crm-failure-rates-switching-cycle.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>crm failure rates switching cycle</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/why-saas-companies-switch-crms/crm-switch-productivity-impact.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>crm switch productivity impact</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/why-saas-companies-switch-crms/crm-switching-reasons-breakdown.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>crm switching reasons breakdown</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/why-saas-companies-switch-crms/crm-stay-versus-switch-comparison.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>crm stay versus switch comparison</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/why-saas-companies-switch-crms/saas-crm-market-growth-timeline.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>saas crm market growth timeline</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/why-saas-companies-switch-crms/crm-platform-churn-comparison.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>crm platform churn comparison</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/why-saas-companies-switch-crms/6-ai-crm-switching.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>6 ai crm switching</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/why-saas-companies-switch-crms/7-early-warning-signs.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>7 early warning signs</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/why-saas-companies-switch-crms/breaking-crm-switching-cycle.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>breaking crm switching cycle</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/blog/shopify-migration-insights-analytics</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-migration-insights-analytics.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>shopify migration insights analytics</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-migration-insights-analytics/1.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>1</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-migration-insights-analytics/2.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>2</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-migration-insights-analytics/3.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>3</image:title>
    </image:image>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/blog/shopify-migration-insights-analytics/4.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>4</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/authors/mehmet-suleyman</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/team/mehmet-suleyman-ceo.jpg</image:loc>
      <image:title>Mehmet Suleyman</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/authors/elif-arslan</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/team/elif-arsan-cmo.jpg</image:loc>
      <image:title>Elif Arslan</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/authors/david-thomson</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/team/david-thomson-cto.jpg</image:loc>
      <image:title>David Thomson</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/authors/sophie-clarke</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/team/sophie-clarke-pm.jpg</image:loc>
      <image:title>Sophie Clarke</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/authors/emma-davies</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/team/emma-davies-cs-lead.jpg</image:loc>
      <image:title>Emma Davies</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/authors/emre-elbeyoglu</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/team/emre-elbeyoglu-contributor.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>Emre Elbeyoglu</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://technologychecker.io/about</loc>
    <image:image>
      <image:loc>https://technologychecker.io/images/about/team-hand-drawn.webp</image:loc>
      <image:title>team hand drawn</image:title>
    </image:image>
  </url>
</urlset>
